Added: 2 years ago
From: spacevidcast
Views: 190,253
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (433)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL why does it show them at 23 feet below sea level when on the Pad!! omg.. they're next to the ocean - if they were -23 feet , they'd be permanently flooded!

  • Such a shame our government cut the fund for NASA. I live in Florida and I go at least twice a year to Ksc. Is a great experience, educational. The IMAX hubble 3d is fun. And hands down for the shuttle launch simulation..

  • lift off

    geil wies ie das betonen

  • i love the space shuttle atlantis!!!!the best!!!!!!

  • Atlantis is my favorite space shuttle of the fleet, but I like them all in addition to Atlantis. Too bad I'll never get to see a space shuttle launch in person now that the space shuttles have been retired, but maybe in the future I could go to KSC and see Space Shuttle Atlantis on display.

  • NASA

    F

    A

    K

    E

    R

    S

    2011 Nasa sent men 220 miles from earth

    1969 the pretended to send men 240,000 miles from earth

    NASA FAKE SCIENCE

  • @DeadJesus100 When you're older and wiser one day (many decades into the future for you unfortunately), and you realize how fucked up you are, how ignorant you are and how often you make a fool of yourself (every time you troll YouTube, at least), you will have the opportunity to redeem yourself for polluting the Web with your Neanderthal views by committing suicide and thankfully ridding the human gene pool of your corruption.

    Until then, please shut the fuck up.

    Thank you, that is all.

  • @AvatarAlphaOmega i am older than you flagfucker

    Stop believing in the lies of the US NWO Government idiot

  • GoPro Hero cam xD

  • just wow... 

  • Space shuttle Atlantis travels 280 miles into space in 2011

    LOL Nasa Liars FAKED THE MOON LANDINGS

    240,000 miles away in 1969

    Nasa Nazi Disney Fairy Tales

    Nasa is dying

    FUCK NASA

    

  • I swear, the sound of the SSMEs starting up has got to be one of the most beautiful sounds in the world.

    Poof.... WOOOOSH... ROOOOOOAAAAAARRRR.

    Hehe. :)

  • AWESOME views!! Lovin' it!!

  • five russians disliked this cause they didnt go to the moon first

  • @TToadTv but they had Sputnik in the 50's.

  • @Mspsychapussycat but didnt go to the moon SO WHAT NOW!!!

  • @TToadTv .............................D­AMIT!

  • @TToadTv Calm down man, just havin a little fun.

  • @TToadTv the brainwashed flagfucker

    No man has ever been to the moon

    Nasa can only go 300 miles into space in 2011

    how far do you think they went in 1969?

    Nasa is a crock of horseshit

  • @DeadJesus100 And you can prove that? cause your a top secret Anti NASA Communist right? ya

  • @TToadTv yes idiot, even nasa admits it has not been further than 400 miles since 1973

    Flagfucker

  • @DeadJesus100 O did you get that off your TOP SECRET NASA website

  • @TToadTv you do realise that americans will rely on russia to be taken to the international space station... HULK SMASH!

  • @zerker12568901 Lol American astronauts have to hitch hike into space next time

  • @TToadTv HAHAHAA!! Those old grudges!!

  • reeeal cool watching videos about space

  • How could anyone not like this video??

  • Anyone know of any good child friendly space stuff? I really want my kids to see some stuff on space but this stuff wont keep their attention.

  • It's Monday! Which seat can I take?

  • It becomes space junk dahdahwah

  • So once the Shuttle departs from the main tank what happens to the tank, does it get manoeuvred back to earth with some built in controls or does it fall back to earth with a tracking device to find its location?

  • @DahDahWahWahDah It does'nt become space junk. It has a tumble valve in it that vents remaining oxygen to help break it up while re-entering the atmosphere. If going to station most of it burns up and the big pieces fall into the Pacific ocean.

  • Why is the altitude -23 feet before launch?

  • @ageetarz Because its 23 feet below sea level. :)

  • hëy_Ãñý_gûýs_wáñt_tÔ_chÂt_wîth­_mÊ

  • Just to see those engine fire then boom its lift off. God I wish I had seen a launch. Great stuff USA

  • excellent quality video.

  • What are the compounds that hold the two pieces together @ 12:42?

  • @DeepAbsentia The two support arms in the front don't carry any thrust loads. Only yaw loads (keeps the orbiter's nose from shifting left or right). The larger supports in the background (near center of the shot) are 17" liquid hydrogen and oxygen feedlines with a ball-and-socket type of attachment. They have small pyrotechnics that detonate when it's time for the orbiter and tank to separate.

  • @spacevidcast That's cool.. thanks man.

  • @spacevidcast 40 years later and Nasa can only go 300 miles into space

    NASA FAKED THE MOON LANDINGS

    HEIL NAZI NASA

  • Science FTW!

  • In a simulation i could get the shuttle into a perfect 110 MIle high orbit, traveling at 9000mph and still had 1k of fuel to spare in the external tank. If i ever get to do it for real i'll be beyond myself!

  • @Doctor699 I'm pretty sure that 9,000 mph isn't fast enough to stay in orbit. That's why the shuttle gets up to 17,500 mph. Anything less than mach 25 in low earth orbit and you're coming back down.

  • @baillou2 yea your right, my mistake, sorry. :P

  • Simply Amazing footage., Its a bit overwhelming to think in the vastness of space and the achievements the human race has acomplished in the past decades of space exploration., My respects to the crews of Apollo 1, SS Challenger and SS Columbia. Their sacrifice will never be forgotten and their memory lives on with each new discovery.

  • absolutely breathtaking. i get giddy every time i watch this video, just the start where the shuttle engine's ignite and then converge almost makes me pass out from awesomeness. Add to that the speed which is uncomprehending.

    (watch the Nasa TV upload here on youtube as well, it's in even more HD)

  • THIS IS AMAZING AND RIVETING. GOING TO SPACE IS MIND BOGGLING. WOULD LOVE TO GO.

  • I know the mains use really REALLY cold fuels, but thats the first time I've noticed them frost over on start! :-)

  • @Hollywood115F16 They frost over on pretty much every firing, including tests.

  • @spacevidcast Yeah. 6000+ degree exhaust and a cold exterior, seperated by only a thin level of material...that is amazing technology! Im sure there is an easy reason why, but its a shame that the Orbiter cant be built from the same materials. Would probably be alot lighter

  • @Hollywood115F16 The orbiter is made of an aluminum alloy. The nozzles have the copper inner lining and use brazed stainless steel tube formed into the nozzle shape with cooling passages designed into the tube-wall. Copper and steel are heavier than aluminum. If there were a way to make a new shuttle orbiter of the same shape and design as the current fleet, it wouldn't be much lighter than Endeavour, the lightest and newest of the three. Discovery's the oldest, but lighter than Atlantis

  • @spacevidcast Thank you for the information, cleared up all of my questions. The STS has its flaws, and its time has come and gone, but its still going to be sad to see them retire

  • There is Trying to Asian brides "busizz4me.info"

  • Great video, this is the best qulitly yet

  • The YouTube video can record up to 15 minutes long !!!!!!

  • When those rockets go full throttle at lift of ...thats pure POWER!

  • GO STS !

  • Happy Anniversary!!

  • Funny how when you see an object moving in space the camera ACCIENTALY seems to blur, NASA dont want anyone to know about anything.

  • @addsarino There's nothing to know about. There is some ice, there's a bit of debris from the separation, but aside from that, there's nothing suspicious, shady, sketchy, or peculiar about the view of space. And I'm saying that regardless of the number of foil hats in America.

  • @spacevidcast but the cam blurered, how can we belive that??

  • @spacevidcast Wow you really are Nasa's best friend aren't you! lol And let me guess..anything suspicious seen in the skies that no one can claim what it is, moves at speeds that have never ever been seen on this planet etc...is just...a weather balloon right? In a strong breeze? lol C'mon. this is 2010. There are a lot of stupid and ignorant people walking this Earth. You have a reputable youtube channel, don't start dumbing down your viewers. Keep up the good work!

  • @spacevidcast Ps I meant to add..there are lots of ignorant people...but lots know these days what is going on. We aren't cavemen anymore, we can think..and know there is more to this universe than just us. How foolish it is to think so otherwise.

  • @jlebesis If it were something of concern, other space agencies would be interested, and investigating this phenomenon too.

  • @jlebesis We don't 'know' that there is intelligent life beyond Earth. The odds of us being the only planet out of trillions in the universe to harbor life is just arrogant and yeah, foolish. But that brings up an issue. See Fermi paradox and Drake equation.

  • @addsarino If there is something suspicious then send your own fucking rocket up there and demostrate to the worl what is it that NASA has been "Hiding"!

  • @addsarino You're a blithering idiot.

  • I used to watch these launches on tv then go out into my front yard to see it go up when I lived in Deltona, FL.

  • can they at least keep their voices down next time =D =D =D i need to hear the bass and roar of the liquid hydrogen mixing with liquid oxygen ignited........

  • Well, it would be cool if we hear sound from comms from shuttle crew and mission control/kenedy firing room without NasaTV guy.. He's pain in ass... And who needs explanations about space shuttle terms after 133 flights and huge database on Internet... Some humans are so lazy..

    But, for spacevidcast crew, nice job... :)

  • youtube.com/watch?v=R-_T0fT7zH­s

  • WOW ive watched it like twice.

  • Complimenti!! Davvero un gran bel video.

  • CooL

  • too sweet

  • 2011

  • @surfsup79 the year is getting close after 2 more months than its jan 1st 2011

  • we will have space ships in the future later shuttles may not be around anymore thers might be shuttles but it be different

  • @mquiroz90 You're actually right,the NASA and other Spacial Agencies are hiring the best Scientists and Engineers to do research about how a Space ship would be created,i believe that in 10 years from now,we will find the proper technology to build these machines,but it will cost a lot more and this will require more than simple astronauts to operate,a new era of Space exploration will see the light soon.

  • @WarrenAch TERRORIST izlam why do block me?

  • the altitude and speed is pretty awesome.

  • Comment removed

  • it was soooo cool to view the launch from the causeway :) wish i could go again

    i filmed the launch from the causeway with a canon HD hf-s10 camera, you guys are welcome to go to my page and see it

  • there goes the last and coolesr space shuttle ever i salute you

  • I don't care if it happens at four o'clock in the moring our time, I'm going to watch the last space shuttle mission launch live -- that's just too important to miss.

  • gostaria de saber ok acontece com os 3 foguete logo depois que eles se separam da nave

  • saw it live on TV, saluated when launched

  • I was there for this launch, it was a perfectly beautiful day. The experience was unlike anything else.

  • Thanks for this video. I saw part of the latest (and last?) Atlantis launch on the BBC. Spent my lunch hour tracking a video like this down. Well worth it!

  • @mattr297 yesterday iwatch the last atlantis launch

  • look at that its just wonderful to see that people can build that kind of aircraft.

  • Comment removed

  • this is amazing!!!

  • Good luck guys we saw you goin up from the Bahamas : )

  • I was just wondering, when the external tank separates from the shuttle. How come it falls back to earth, and the shuttle stays in space ?

  • @6t5r6t Because when the orbiter releases the tank they are in an elliptical orbit. The orbiter does burns to circularize its orbit to stay in space. When the tank gets on the low side of its elliptical orbit, gravity pulls it in.

  • @mach25man Thanks :) I searched the internet and couldn't find an answer. An amazing piece of engineering, such a shame it's retiring :(

  • @mach25man Technically, isn't gravity always at work to pull in an orbital object? My understanding is that when the tank gets to a low orbit, it interacts with the upper atmosphere where friction slows it down. It need lose less than 100 mph for its orbit to decay completely.

  • @peakman2006 Correct. On the low part of the orbit the friction is part of it. Also there is a tumble valve in the tank which vents un-used fuel to help the tank tumble to help break it up.

  • LELAND MELVIN!

  • What happens to the primary reservoir? It just roams forever in low earth orbit?

  • @Mendelevium146 gravity

  • @lespaulplayer09 at this altitude and this speed its in orbit

  • @Mendelevium146 no but they eventutually will crash back down to earth. the ist has to come down a bit for the shuttle then theshuttle uses its thrusters to push it back up into an orbit where it wont just get pulled down by earth. you really underestimate gravity's power. it all eventually comes down if its within range and all that space trash will fall back down

  • the space shuttle looks better than it did years ago technology

  • the space shuttle looks better than it did years ago technology

  • 17000 mph

  • whoa! this video is so High Definition!

    Very neat!

  • well a top fuel dragster can do it in 4. what's amazing about this is that it goes UP haha

  • I FLIPPING LOVE THIS SH*T!!!

  • Divide by zero and cross focus more pineapples.

  • Hello!

    Kár hogy lassan az űrepülőprogram nemsokára a multé.Remek video grat.Nasa.

  • I WANNA GO TO SPACE SO BAD XD

  • @DemosMX yeah.

  • How much fuel was used in this operation do you think?

  • Comment removed

  • Plus the ISS, Few thousand tonnes.

  • oOo Number time :D Well the main tank holds 539,400 US gal, and about half is used by T+30. The orbiter weighs ~240,000 lbs. at liftoff, total gross weight is ~4.4 million lbs, with total thrust ~6.8 million lbs! Or look at it this way, the shuttle must reach about 17,180 mph (7.68 Km/sec) or about Mach 23 to reach orbit and be free of atmospheric drag.

    Consider too that over 4 million sensors are collecting data every second for analysis. I'm guessing she doesn't run any form of WinOS ;)

  • @iSahand 534,900 gal of fuel in the external tank (LOX and H2) and 435,000 pounds of solid fuel in the boosters.

  • Guys, I sincerely don't think this is entirely in favor for the human kind

  • I think I'm in love. This is gorgeous.

  • 17,000 Mph ................ Oh My God Wat The Heck? Cars On Highways Are Not Even 100Mph And They Look Fast If U Watch Them Pass , Nascaar Is Like 200mph And They Are Fast ... 17,000. Imagin That , I Want To Go To A Launch Before I Die.

  • Its because there isnt any air resisting the shuttle. It'll be a lot different at such a high altitude.

  • @juniorelsonero

    OkAy MaN

  • So Beautiful, So Unbelievable. Von Braun was a genius.

  • to cool

  • nice were did you get the cool countown clock from

  • why don't you guys shut the f*** up and let us watch the launch...

  • @svinehunden We did. As we mentioned in the first 60 seconds of this video, as soon as the clock starts counting down from T-9 minutes we turn it over to NASA TV for their commentary exclusively. You didn't hear a word from us for most of the video. But thanks for playing.

  • lol

    and sorry... ;)

    but i don't care who talks. just wanted to watch the launch and hear the sound without any talk... too bad...

  • @svinehunden Alas, I don't believe NASA makes that an option. We can mute the sound completely but you'll want to hear the SSMEs and SRBs light up. NASA speaks over all of it, but that is official NASA PAO speaking.

  • thanks for the answers :)

    is the whole thing edited when you get it or can you do that?

    i'll like to see a professional recording from a single camera with the sound from it's position... know what i mean... like if i was there :D

  • @svinehunden It is switched live, so the camera angles and audio you're hearing are exactly what you would see if you were watching it live on our site or on NASA TV. We do have single camera replays available, however, since the audio always has PAO on it, you get that on the replays too. They don't send clean audio from NASA as far as I know.

  • too bad...

  • @svinehunden why don't you fuck ur mom that nazihooker

  • What an astonishing piece of machinery.. such a damn shame they're retiring it.

    Thanks for the huge NASA budget Obama.....

  • @X6insane6X

    Way to make that amazing piece of machinery a political bent. The Shuttle is old, outdated, and a pain to keep running anymore. Picture it like a workhorse truck you have had since the 80s, but it's gotten to that stage that it seems that the more you fix, the more breaks. You've dropped the block already, you've swapped the transmission more than a few times, and some of the parts you need aren't even being manufactured anymore(Atlantis suffers hardest from this...)

  • fuck obama!

  • I hate obama for those of you who are interested in space obama cancelled the man made space program no more space for us. :(

  • It's a good thing that they are ending the space shuttle missions. They are getting too old and dangerous.

    Anybody know what Nasa's next space craft will be???

  • Obama just cancelled their next space craft Ares. Shuttles are in their prime . They are not dangerous. Both accidents were caused by Mgt. The orbiters perform flawlessly every mission.

  • They were good in their prime in the 80s and 90s, but they are now almost 30 years old. And for a spacecraft, even a jet liner, that is old.

    So does NASA have any other ideas regarding space travel?

  • I dont think age matters as long as their taken care of. These orbiters except for their burnt re-entry marks on the outside look brand new on the inside. Built for 100 space missions, they have a pretty robust build to them. Jet liners are not taken care of anywhere close to the degree the orbiters are. Obama wants to turn it over to private enterprise. With that in mind, it will be another decade until we launch humans from this country.

  • So Russia will continue to use their Soyuz rockets to go to the ISS until America has got its act together?

  • Correct. And Nasa will buy seats from Russia to send US astronauts to ISS at a price of 50 million per seat.

  • Okay, thats not cheap. Cheers for the info by the way :)

  • The actual reason there retiring the space shuttle is because ever since the Columbia incident.

  • Well nasa new about the problems. And launced anyways.

    Just like with challenger. Thanks to them being sttuborn. Its there own fault.

  • i watched this at school today...

  • You might as well give the rest of the world credit in all the other ideas that came from the USA like cars, airplanes, computers, baseball, the light bulb etc.

  • AMERICAN MIGHT!! Weapons in Space. Y Que putos!!

  • I met the crew of this mission in Huntsville, at the George Marshall space flight center.

  • It shows altitude: -23 ft. Why negative? Can anyone tell me? I got this kind of measurement in physics problem but never seen in real scenario like this one. Anyone know?

  • @tx77015ls1

    LOL, most advanced machine ever created? Remove the word "ever" and oh stop that "US have it others don't" attitude. The brains behind that machine are from all over the world. Good that US have it, but don't brag.

  • Built by Rockwell USA here in the USA by Americans. No foreign parts on this baby.

  • @mach25man

    Indeed. I read about it too! An awasome 'product' made by us without a doubt. However, when I said remove 'ever' and 'don't show US have it attitude' I meant that those people who worked on it aren't just US born people. Furthermore, all techs aren't born in US. Either way, it is relative concept but ppl like to brag about things. When knowledge is infinite and it's everywhere, what's to brag about? That was my point. LOL

  • I dont see it as an attitude. There"s nothing wrong with showing a little pride. Good for him if he had something to do with it.

  • @mach25man

    Well you know how it is, words can't convey true human feelings. Perhaps if he had said that in a different way or maybe said face to face, this dilemma wouldn't have happened. I didn't take his 'attitude' seriuosly. It's just that I've seen ppl talk like that about religion, science, people and so on. You wonder why they do like that, when there are broader way of thinking. But no he has right to be proud. So am I, but not as 'only US can do' but rather as 'only human can do'. :D

  • I think only astronauts see the earth as one. Back on earth there is much division.

  • @mach25man

    On this vid's forum I don't think it would be proper to talk about concept such as 'seeing one'. But if you must, then you also have to understand, we humans aren't animals, we have the ability to think and go BEYOND THINKING. And by that I mean this: What we see as one or not one is in our mind. It is all about being wise (wisdom that is, the ability to decide what is right and wrong and do right thing regardless of it's usual appearance). So not only astronauts see earth as one.

  • Wow, I'm dont know much about philosophy or logic. You might as well be off in another world with those comments. Sorry ! This is a shuttle video. Right ?

  • @mach25man

    That's why I've said "i don't think it would be proper to talk about...". But no it has nothing to do w/ philosophy. If you say logic, then you are looking at at machine that put human logic (in engineering) to the test. Thinking broad always rewards one w/ broad things, be it concrete or abstract. That was the general idea. You can fire a rocket anytime but can't see how differently it flies each time until you think about it. (it's a loose, broken analogy but hope you understand).

  • @mach25man They orbit the Earth in 90 minutes.... they see it like I dream it. Someday......

  • @mindsoulbody

    It probably measures 0 from the height of the sea or something similar. So, if the launch pad is built in a valley lower than the sea, there's a negative value. I'm not entirely positive that this is the case here, but probably something like that.

  • @Thorsell

    Thanks dude. I had a similar thought but needed confirmation. You (and I) are probably right. :D

  • Pad A stands 48 feet above sea level so the statistics on this vid are not exact.

  • Agreed...not only americans that participated for this fabulous machine,german scientists,russians, and lots of other europeans/asians contributed to it...without von braun and his click,americans would have never left the earth....

  • @WarrenAch

    Indeed. You said it. :D