Added: 5 years ago
From: 7dc
Views: 305,951
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (476)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Shermans in the film seem to be either 17-pounder armed "Firefly" M4s, or perhaps 105mm armed Israeli "Super Shermans." Anyone know which? I can't recall...

  • CONTINUATION OF THE SECOND COMMENT

    The scene with the Polish paratroopers massacred while still in air was also cut. The viewer does not see how a paratrooper gives his life to recuperate one of the few supplies landing near them, to obtain few useless head covers. And the viewer would appreciate the irony of the situation when the German general offers a chocolate to the surrendering British officer, and as the latter is reluctant to accept, he says: “It is excellent. It is British.”

  • CONTINUATION OF THE PREVIOUS COMMENT

    Occasionally the statements issued by Lou Diamond Phillips or his guests are wrong.

    Much more useful to the viewer would be the uncut version of a movie, especially when the “censor” seems to don’t understand what he’s doing.

    Because of the cuts, the viewer does not know that the captured Allied plans were real and the Germans soon realized that they were real and acted accordingly, waiting ready at the supply dropping points or paratroop reinforcements.

  • The movie was recently offered on The Military Channel.

    It is understandable that the Military Channel has to self-sustain with advertise during their late night weekend movies, but the interviews and comments from Lou Diamond Phillips should not steal actual footage time from the real movies.

    In a serious enterprise like “A Bridge Too Far” every scene is there with a reason, and if the movie’s director wanted it there, it should be there.

    CONTINUED IN THE FOLLOWING COMMENT

  • I know know why they call it that In tf2

  • it was an great movie? its stil an awsome movie @7dc

  • "Most devastating battle of World War 2?" Maybe for the western allies, however Stalingrad was the most devastating battle EVER.

  • @deltasword1994: Right you are.... as savage as the fighting was in the ETO (and it was, according to many Germans who had served in both places), the battles were smaller in scale, and didn't cost as much in men and material lost as did the titantic battles in the east. The war between Germany and the USSR in the east was so large as to defy imagination. Dr. Richard Overy's book "Blood Upon the Snow," is a good introduction to it.

  • Unlike many movies these days, this movie has an actual All-Star Cast!

  •  I just love that typical english reaction, hilarious XD

  • this is by far the movie with the best actors i have ever heard off! Michael Caine, Sean Connery, Gene Hackman, Anthony Hopkins and others!!!

  • nazi's should have won :(

  • Comment removed

  • Wow, I had forgotten having seen this film. It's a hoot seeing all those actors so young!

    We have precious few of the combatants that survived, alive today.

  • Looks like the longest trailer I've ever seen xD

  • my grandfather is one of these men! got letters and picture too!

  • One of the great British war films. I just cannot bring myself to watch it though, Operation Market Garden is very sad and depressing

  • here's a nice quote. "we're saving you?"*camera pans to the right showing a hole in the wall* "or should you be saving us?"

  • R,I.P staff sargeant Patrick Riches killed in arnhem and posthumorously awarded the george cross for defending the wounded my grandfather

  • @greggyinfantry "Posthumorously" ? Indeed, you englishmen are the true masters of sneaky humour.

  • I thought the siege of Stalingrad was the most bloodiest WW2 battle.

  • @MysteriousPinkFlufff You could say Operation Market GHarden Was the bloodiest battle of Europe, while Starlingrad was that of the eastern front

  • @MysteriousPinkFlufff

    Ooperation market garden - 30 000 losses on both sides

    Battle of Stalingrad - 2 000 000 losses on both sides

  • I never realized such a massive operation had taken place in my own country!!

  • It still is a great movie, i remember when i first saw it!

  • Don`t forget the enormous losses of the RN in the Med. And they won. Italian landings.

  • Without a doubt one of the greatest war movies ever made.

  • Don't know which had the better cast...this or the longest day...

  • SSSCCCHAWWNN KONNARYYY....

  • One of the best cast line-ups of all time. Shame the film didn't turn out so good. I mean, it was good, but could've been a lot better.

  • Hurrah~ It's an old school version of Expandable~!

  • looks great

  • Yay for Holland :)

  • this a great film and one of the only ones... where the germans win

  • A strenuous attempt to replicate the magic of "The Longest Day" and, of course, one even based on another Cornelius Ryan source, but just as assuredly a disappointing imitation of it....

  • to transity 3- a few comments down - the word ur looking for is irony

  • An all-star cast in what was, and still is,a great war movie .

  • americans will be stay the same in propaganda art.

  • this is what i like in movies...real explosions, sets and props, none of this CGI nonsense

  • Very, very fine film. I associated with some of the characters, which can't be said for war films with casts this large.

    Tragicomedy at its finest, really. This battle played out so badly for the Allies, it was sad and funny at the same time.

  • I wish Speilberg and Hanks would remake this movie. It would be so damn awesome!

  • @JDubs878 There's no cast that could compete with the original cast, this movie has some of the best actors in history.

  • @masterchef2244

    I agree the cast of big name actors in this movie would be nearly impossible to duplicate in a remake, but I don't think its necessary to do so. Just like Band of Brothers where the actors were pretty unknown but the result was amazing, the same can be done here.

    As a kid I loved this movie, but as I grew up I began to notice that not everything was as realistic as it could be. That's why it'd be great to have Speilberg do a remake to make it as real and gritty as he did with SPR

  • @JDubs878 Nah, this movie is fine the way it is. I wish someone would remake the Battle of the Bulge, and use A LOT of armor. Or how about an honest movie about Kasserine Pass.

  • Epic trailer!

  • Too bad it has a sudden end :(

  • @stevinatornl thats probobly my Fav too- i watch this whenever i get to ssick for school. I jsut lay on the couch and watch this all day

  • I mean unrealistic based on action, none of the ambushes shown in this video were helpfull for Germans, also its funny how Germans almost always miss while Americans are accuruate as hell.

  • Yeah great movie, but unrealistic as hell.

  • yeea i live near nijmegen. but this movie was not shot there, it was taken a few kilometers further up the river, cause they could not block the nijmegen bridge for this movie. still love this movie!

    and all thanks for the brave men who truly fought these battles. they gained our freedom!

  • SEAN CONNERY!!! ya, rock on!

  • ''Greatest Battles of WW2''?

    My ass...KURSK > Market Garden

  • @milanTHErocker

    kursk was for fags hiding in tanks. Market Garden was for real men

  • @MustNotRead are you fucking retarded?

  • Gentlemen, I like to think of this as one of those American western films. The paratroops, lacking substantial equipment, always short of food- these are the besieged homesteaders. The Germans, well naturally they're the bad guys. Thirty corps, we my friends are the cavalry- on the way to the rescue!" what a line!

  • @GeoJnr92: Edward Fox - that guy practically stole the movie with that line. I wish he'd have done more action roles, he had a great deal of magnetism and charisma in them.

  • This is a very good movie. Funny enough movies from that era where higly unrealistic. And this movie is a great exception. It is even more realistic than modern day WWII movies. Haha.

  • This movie is made in Deventer. Thats where i lives

  • Stalingrad and Kursk were the two most devastating battles of World War 2.

    And btw, does anyone know what happened after Market Garden?

  • @EvilFingers They crossed the Rhine

  • @buildingeverything No, the Battle of the Bulge.

  • @EvilFingers The crossed the Rhine after Market Garden too, he never asked for what happened right after :P

  • @buildingeverything The Allies didnt cross the Rhine River until 1945, because of the Ardenne Offensive that the Germans Launched in December 1944, which is the Battle of the Bulge, and if the Allies had actually crossed the Rhine, the Ardenne Offensive wouldve undoubtedly be canceled to deal with the Threat of the Allies pouring into Germany and WW2 wouldve been over way before May 8 1945.

  • @EvilFingers /facepalm

    You really didn't get my replay didn't you...

  • @buildingeverything Youre not being specific in your reply

  • @EvilFingers

    After market garden fell flat the US managed to capture the first major German city, Aachen, while continuing the Battle of the Hurtgen Forest and also began driving the Germans out of Lorraine but until Wacht am Rhine (the Battle of the Bulge) was launched in December the other Allies were mainly besieging the Siegfried Line or clearing the channel coastlines, the Allies didn't get across the Rhine until March 1945 when they captured the Ludendorff Bridge at Remagen

  • @snakes3425 Finally, someone that actually knows his/her History and Thank You.

  • BEST EPIC TRAILER EVER

  • Comment removed

  • great trailer, great actors, great movie 

  • Actually the most 'devastating' battle of WWII was probably Stalingrad but this is still a very fine film.

  • @Shadowman4710 I myself consider stalingrad more of a campaign, but yes we may never deny it was indeed a battle, a very prolonged battle over a small city that took almost as much time as the germans did getting there. I would pesonaly say that Kursk would the most "devastating" battle of the Second World War. But if you would include long battles, (or relativley quick), you should, or may consider the Battle of Berlin the Siege of Leningrad,if you include seiges, or the battl-sorry, no space

  • @tromuniapp: one could fairly say that, to the soldier or civilian who died, or whose family was killed, that battle was the most devastating of WWII.

  • @Shadowman4710 True... so Occident centered vision, isn't it?

  • @nickie2011 This is going to be true of all movies made before the collapse of the Soviet Union. It's only been since the 90's that western historians (such as Steven Glantz) have had access to the Red Army files. "Stalingrad" (a German film) is an excellent introduction to the Eastern Front (if told from the German point of view). Another good film is Sam Peckinpah's "The Iron Cross" (1977) which again, is from the German point of view, although it is in English. Forget "Enemy At the Gates."

  • @Shadowman4710 oh yeah

  • @Shadowman4710 Forget WWII all together. WWI was nothing short of mass genocide...

  • It would be funny if the allies won in the movie. I've never seen the movie but it looks like the kind of movie with the good guys winning in the end. We lost operation market garden.

  • i live like an hour from Arnhem

  • @milaroos

     you're so awesome, can i touch u ??

  • I bought this DVD at pearl harbor eight years ago, I just found it in the attic yesterday, man it was the first WWII film I've seen!! Real special to me.

  • Not bad as a 70' propaganda movie.

  • OK commander,..... without the sarcasm. Give me your "take", on this !

  • it's a goooood flick!

  • Nowhere near as realistic as Band of Brothers.

  • @Cool2BCeltic true but this movie was filmed back in 70 and band of brothers 2001, in this movie they use 50 milion dollars and band of brothers 120 milion dollars, and ofcourse you cant compare tech in 70' and in the 2000

  • @Cool2BCeltic yeah and 1o years from now some other series will be more realistic than Brothers...and realilsm isnt always for the best anyways. Anyways, Brothers as great as it is, only takes into account one company whereas Bridge is looking at the battle to a greater degree.

  • @555paint @Cool2BCeltic

    I hate to rain on anybodies parade, but they are both perfect examples of allied ( western+Israeli ) propoganda.

    WHEN the "west" finally get wise to american imperialism and there PR machine ( Hollywood ), [ both run by zionism ]. The citizens of this planet are going to have to undergo a, cheap, 'off the shelf',' no frills', "this is a recession you know !", re-education program.

    It's not going to be very pretty.

  • @011258stooie OK good luck getting back to your home planet.

  • @555paint

    Do you have the bottle, commander ?

  • @555paint

    Hmmmmm....thought so. Another gutless, hit and run, ghostly keyboard warrior.

  • @011258stooie: Are you f*cked in the head or just plain stupid ?

  • @gazzavc

    Do you have anything construcive to say about the video, or the statment that I made ?

  • @Cool2BCeltic

    Brothers forcues entirly on Easy Company's experiences during the war in Europe but doesn't go into much detail on larger events like the Breakout from Normandy, Operation Market Garden (focuing primarily on Einhoven and Easy company's exploits while leaving out the other parts of the Operation) Crossing the Rhine, the Rhur Pocket. A Bridge Too Far focused enterily on Market Garden and the events surrounding it same way longest day focused soley on D-Day

  • music is dumb film is cool

  • that movie fill of stars

  • Heilige Maria, voll der Gnaden! That scene when Robert Redfort and his men cross the Waal at Nimwegen is absolutely terrific!

  • omg I'm gonna slap myself because I didnt watch this movie and then I'm gonna download it and watch cause it have AMAZING trailer

  • I love the scene where Elliot Gould walks onto a little road, and start walking towards the camera, and gradually a bunch of other soldiers join them and walk towards the bridge. SO COOL!

  • Let's not forget that Hitler made more or less the same logistical errors with the Battle Of The Bulge.

  • Typing mistake in the description.. it's "a" not "an"

  • der film ist cool

  • Gene Hackman's accent in this was appalling.

  • it was a god film

    

  • Why does everyone talk on why the allies lost here and y not how the Germans won

  • @TheOwie15 It's very simple and cleaver really, the Germans used what were esseentilly Guerrilla warfare tactic's to stall the advancing tanks. The unit's in the way were small but realised that the Brits were advancing on a two lane road that was raised from ground leavel too keep it dry and the land on eighter side was wooded and marshy so all they had to do was disable the lead tanks and shoot a few bullets and the brits were stalled. Though they were lucky the Brits ignored intell.

  • Continued..the plan was flawed from the start when they expected 30 CORPS ( or XXX CORPS ) to advance up a narrow highway / road and reach Arnhem. Plus also not landing the british para's closer to Arnhem ( the " jeep squadron " ) as they were blocked / ambushed initially and had to fight through; suffering casualties and using up ammo before they even reached the bridge ( and fatigued ). Regards.

  • Hi, also along with comments ref " why it failed ", the allies / allied leadership were overconfident due to their success at " Normandy D-Day " and a perception that the Germans were " psychologicaly " defeated / or would withdraw / retreat to defend Germany. Hence reports of armoured forces in the area were " ignored " or " diminished "; it was in a way their ( the Airborne forces ) " Crete ". Plus...continued next comment....

  • I have the soundtrack on LP.

  • Am I glad that I have that movie!

  • This is the most ridiculously awesome cast I've ever seen.

  • Sorry, that's not completly right either. They had intel from the french resistance and aireal pic's that showed some tanks. They were in such a rush to want this to happen they ignored it. Yes 1st airborne is the modern day Regiment. They never fought again during the 2nd world war due to there loses at this drop. All of the top decision makers were to blame. They wanted this to happen, so it did.

  • The Polish airborne was completly wiped out. The british 1st airborne never jumped again due to such heavy closes. And Montgomery who planed it said it failed because it was not fully equiped.

  • This is such an amazing novel, and movie for that matter.

  • this is the last great old fashioned wwii movie

  • Wow, I just learned that the bridge at Arnhem is now officially named the John Frost Bridge, in honor of John Frost (played by Anthony Hopkins) who defended the north end of it until he and his men were overrun. It took over thirty years until the official name change because Frost didn't want the honor. That was a fine man!

  • Such a great movie about a great tragedy!

  • We my friends are the cavalry

  • This is one of the best world war II movies

  • Great work Herr von Keiper! Thank you for posting these.

  • Great Film, sad . As a kid you view it as you want action in a film.When you get older you understand the real human cost as in this case the film based on real events. tactical planning seems that boats were over looked on this operation as a way of getting men arcoss rivers without using the bridges. 7 days madness for planning,I think blowing up/damaging Arnhem bridge in a air sortie would be better idea. It have stopped the german tanks - shows no fire air support except at the start

  • Best war movie EVER!

  • eacellent version of what really happened... i remember my dad telling me the story to this when i was a little girl.. he was there.. my hero.. my dad!! xxxxxxxxxxxx rip dad.. god bless xxxxx

  • Favourite moment is when the Germans advance on the beseiged and outnumbered paras and say they are there to talk about terms of surrender - meaning the surrender of the British, of course. The British officer replies 'I'm sorry, we don't have the facilities to accept your surrender!'

  • They should have just let Eisenhower handle the entire show. They would have made it to Germany much earlier. Market Garden was doomed from the very start.

  • @Aleancelo

    Eisenhower wasn't chosen as Supreme Commander for anything but his political abilities. He was there to rule on the plans put forth by others.

  • Look at the cast! wow

  • This film should be called:

    "An hour too long"

  • i can not find my copy of this movie im so mad

  • I've more respect for brave men who fight in battles like the real Arnhem or our boys in Iraq and Afghanistan than the over-paid wankers who play football that society now class as 'heroes'....Its a brilliant film, especially as a portrayal of how futile war really is though.

  • This is one of my all time favourite moives.The things that made it so good are, the all star cast, great music score, great battle scences, famous lines, and a great depiciton of anit war. This is a great moive and i recommend it to anyone who likes war films.

  • the allies where unlucky too there was just an panzer force stationed near arnhem. a bunch of kingtigers shot the crap out of them!!!!

  • any more films made stating america defeated germany in workd war(not russia)

  • You don't land paratroopers on top of two elite Panzer divisions and relieve them by going up a SINGLE road that can be cut at any time.

  • @mariotrooper101 There were MANY reasons the entire operation was a travesty, it was just pure coincidence that the Germans rested 2 S.S. Panzer divisions and troops at Arnhem. Bad british intelligence, no radios working, over run drop zones for supplies, bad roads etc etc....

  • @TheMasterNo6 I know!!!!!! >:( I have the game (Close Combat: A Bridge Too Far) and the movie. Also, the British KNEW that there were tanks stationed in Arnhem but Monty didn't want to cancell it after at the effort he (and his troops) but into it already.

  • @mariotrooper101

    All that bad planning and rushing (plus some bad luck too), because 2 generals on the same side wanted to beat each other to reach Berlin.

    Y'all know who I'm talking about.

  • @AlexSDU plus all that rumors that "krauts" only had old men and boys... but as far as "bad planning" is concerned... it was a "deuce" again. better planning by the germans on d-day would probably crush the allied forces right on the beach. well... im glad how things happened...

  • ALLY

  • Not a great movie, but definitely watchable. Only minor complaints: (1) Sometimes it seemed like Allies and Nazis were literally sharing the town, like one block Allies, next one Nazis. In reality, each side would have had to establish their respective fronts, and (2) chicken shit R. O'Neill playing a general? One of the all time sucky actors.

  • ...wasn't so violent as Stalingrad but was hell just in 9 days allied casualties were over 17.000.. Stalingrad aside, Battle for Moscow (Oct 2, 41 - Jan 7, 42) casualties estimated around 400.000 German and 650.000 - 1.280.000 Soviets, Soviets defended the city., loosing minimum 10.000 people a DAY.

  • i can not identificate a tank in 1:44, i know, its some german tank in the film, but what type of tank is it in reality, maybe Leopard, i dont know, does anybody knows it? thx

  • @Lama006 It was actually a loaned Dutch army tank from the 1970s made to look like a German ww2 one.

  • @TheMasterNo6 It is actually a german made Leopard 1 tank (trying to go as a Tiger II), I don't know if it's the belgium army who loaned it out for the movie, fact is though that its a Leopard 1.

  • @GreenPCan Your right about the tank. I'm also sure it was the Belgium army that loaned it now come to think of it.

  • your grammar (it was an(a) great movie)

  • Saving prvate Ryan was fake, but it was a good movie, this was real, and in this briged, British Batallion lose angaist panzer elite of germans...

  • SAVING PVT RYAN NOT FAKE GUYS!!!!

  • @ebayman2 trollface.jpg

  • i think its the best war-movie ever... because it is a real story and anti-war. not like saving private ryan...

  • Holland was difficult to capture by the germans, and was hard to recapture by the allies...

  • kane looks young

  • "the most devastating battle of WW2"?

    Only if your a 3 year old. It was mickey mouse compared to Kursk, Stalingrad, Moscow, Kharkov or even Monte Cassino.

  • If you were on of the british soldiers in Arnhem you woudn't think operation Market Guarden was a mickey mouse.

    This operation wasn't so violent as Stalingrad but was hell just in 9 days allied casualties were over 17.000

  • @sherminatorize If it had succeeded the war could of ended in 1944 ad many lives could of been saved. It would also have chnged the hstory of the next 40 or 50 years in Europe had it come off. We would of reached Berlin before the Russians and so there would have been no partioned Berlin or Wall come too that. There may have been no cold war either.

  • @sherminatorize

    You see, the amazing thing about this movie is that there was no CGI in those days... that was all WWII aircraft and armor. That was the 82nd airbourne jumping en mass

  • @sherminatorize agreed and RESPECT and HONOR for red devils who lost about 8000 men :((((