98% genes are the same between human and chipz. It means 98% protein are the same. But, missing 1 protein is enough for fatal disease. 2% genes, is a huge difference!
Why it can prove evolution?
My PC's parts are resisters and caps. and around 30 chips, compare my PC and my VCD player, my be 98% parts are the same! So, My PC is evolve from my VCD player?
I don't know much, I admit it. So you are educated and you know so much, I hope you can show me how to create a live cell from inorganic. If you cannot, I cannot believe random and non-purpose driven chem. reactions can result in life, else, your brain reasoning processes is not better than "random processes". Don't take out something from a live cell, and create so call Man-made life to fool me. Thanks.
There is absolutely no controversy within the scientific community whether evolution is true or false, it's a fact. Period. It's not only supported by biologists, but also by geology, genealogy, paleontology and also by medicine, ecology, agriculture etc. Evolution ties all these fields together. Nothing makes sense without it.
It's the only thing that should be taught at school not both. Because we as grown ups, teachers, parents should teach our children what's true and tested.
"There is absolutely no controversy within the scientific community"
Just because evolutionist stop school teaching any theory to doubt about evolution. There is not discussion but autocracy.
The fact is evolution is not proven. From time to time, evolutionist say I find a missing link... but still, there are missing links. The latest fossil of the trace of a "Fish" left on mud overthrow previous conjecture about fish evolution... You call this PROVEN?
@alfredjan27 If you want to see a fossil of each evolutionary step, you simply won't find it. Because fossilization only happens on rare conditions. They know this. But it doesn't require that we find all transitional fossils. Bear in mind that evolution is not only proven by looking at bones and draw conclusions from it. It's proven on many fields of science and I can give you a few of them.
@alfredjan27 Like geology, like I mentioned before. The deeper we found fossils, the more gradual changes we see. For instance the whale. They found so many transitional fossils with it's gradual changesit they could trace it back to it's land dwelling mammal ancestor. Look it up!
@alfredjan27 Evolution is also proven in genetics and molecular biology. A few examples, we share 98% of the same DNA with the chimpanzees. A large chunk of that DNA is "junk". We possess DNA to grow a tail, but it's simply "switched" off. How do you explain that? Why would we have that redundant DNA if we don't use it? Evolution explains this very well: because our ancestors are apes with tails. Through time and evolution, we lost the need to grow a tail. Oh and newsflash: we're apes too.
All the motor car are designed. They share 99% similar materials. Their engine are similar May I said my sunny is evolve to BMW?
Why evolution stop now? why no chimpanzees evolve to another transactional species?
98% is the genomic divergences between human and chipz. Not the whole DNA sequence. Chipz have 24 pair chromosomes, How can we compare 2 seq. in difference size? You said something you don't have evidence. superstition? 迷信?
@alfredjan27 It took you 6 months to come back with this bullshit analogy? You're comparing machines that are man made that can't reproduce on itself naturally with living beings? You obviously don't understand evolution, genetics, DNA, natural selection, biology or even nature in the first place. I'm not even going to educate you. You're a grown man, do your own research (what you should've done the past 6 months). Check out what REAL scientists (not pastors, priests etc) say about it. Goodbye.
I don't know much, I admit it. So you are educated and you know so much, I hope you can show me how to create a live cell from inorganic. Don't take out something from a live cell, and create so call Man-made life to fool me. Thanks.
Creationism should never be taught at school, because it's simply not science at all. Creationism starts with a pre-assumption of what the facts are which can't be tested. That is not how science works. Simply put, what's not testable or observable, is not science. Evolution is, because it is tested and observed numerous times. We mortals "don't" see it happen, because it takes millions of years to see any significant changes.
They can't proof evolution is true either, besides keep promoting (or brainwashing) it as a fact. You can believe it if you want to, but it doesn't make this theory a fact.
I only know that a building cannot exist without the works of builders. NOTHING in the world just exists somehow without the work of some people.
Well I can agree with that i don't like hype non sense/bs or propaganda. But still you can rule out anything cause WE dont KNOW we want to think we know but we don't & who knows when we ever will know maybe thats what death is, transition, who knows!
Well I never ruled that out thats the thing, I've taken this into consideration too! But... my beleives have been changing and i'm confused in what to beleive in. I think it's really a mixture of things. By creationism what are you speaking of exactly just to be sure?
That's is what I think school's policy should be. Teach kids BOTH theories, then they can choose which one to believe, instead of only one theory is allowed. That is not education, that is indoctrination.
By creationism, I myself believe the biblical 6000 years young earth creation.
進化論是假說，創造論是迷信。
fovoen 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
進化論是迷信。
Onaivara 4 weeks ago
非鳥類恐龍有羽毛的化石証據都已經出土了，這些所謂專家，真夠outdate.
fovoen 2 months ago
hallo 各位相信进化论的猿人后代你们好。。。噢噢，别误会了我的祖先是人不是猿人，所以我们有点不同，啊对了，要蕉吗？吃蕉吧你们~~~~ 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。。。
ZZYY86 5 months ago
Comment removed
ZZYY86 5 months ago
@isamu135
98% genes are the same between human and chipz. It means 98% protein are the same. But, missing 1 protein is enough for fatal disease. 2% genes, is a huge difference!
Why it can prove evolution?
My PC's parts are resisters and caps. and around 30 chips, compare my PC and my VCD player, my be 98% parts are the same! So, My PC is evolve from my VCD player?
alfredjan27 1 year ago
@alfredjan27
@isamu135
It took 6 minutes to read your post and reply.
I don't know much, I admit it. So you are educated and you know so much, I hope you can show me how to create a live cell from inorganic. If you cannot, I cannot believe random and non-purpose driven chem. reactions can result in life, else, your brain reasoning processes is not better than "random processes". Don't take out something from a live cell, and create so call Man-made life to fool me. Thanks.
alfredjan27 1 year ago
進化論信徒認為有過渡生物, 但為何今天沒有過渡生物出現, 進化或者突變停止.
進化是真的話, 我們今日應該會見到有進化中的過渡生物
原始的活化石腔棘魚仍存在, 今天他們仍然是"原始", 但為了適者生存, 腔棘魚早應該進化成過渡生物,! 顯示進化在他們身上沒有出現.
果蠅的生命週期奇短, 在實驗室有一直有養活大量果蠅, 但是沒有實驗室出現自然進代成另一種過渡生物品種的進化果蠅
alfredjan27 1 year ago 2
mygodzilla 11 months ago
@alfredjan27 你條撚樣有書唔好好讀，係度搞風搞雨，怪力亂神！
orphanrafe 9 months ago
2/2
There is absolutely no controversy within the scientific community whether evolution is true or false, it's a fact. Period. It's not only supported by biologists, but also by geology, genealogy, paleontology and also by medicine, ecology, agriculture etc. Evolution ties all these fields together. Nothing makes sense without it.
It's the only thing that should be taught at school not both. Because we as grown ups, teachers, parents should teach our children what's true and tested.
isamu135 1 year ago
@isamu135
"There is absolutely no controversy within the scientific community"
Just because evolutionist stop school teaching any theory to doubt about evolution. There is not discussion but autocracy.
The fact is evolution is not proven. From time to time, evolutionist say I find a missing link... but still, there are missing links. The latest fossil of the trace of a "Fish" left on mud overthrow previous conjecture about fish evolution... You call this PROVEN?
alfredjan27 1 year ago
@alfredjan27 If you want to see a fossil of each evolutionary step, you simply won't find it. Because fossilization only happens on rare conditions. They know this. But it doesn't require that we find all transitional fossils. Bear in mind that evolution is not only proven by looking at bones and draw conclusions from it. It's proven on many fields of science and I can give you a few of them.
isamu135 1 year ago
@alfredjan27 Like geology, like I mentioned before. The deeper we found fossils, the more gradual changes we see. For instance the whale. They found so many transitional fossils with it's gradual changesit they could trace it back to it's land dwelling mammal ancestor. Look it up!
isamu135 1 year ago
@alfredjan27 Evolution is also proven in genetics and molecular biology. A few examples, we share 98% of the same DNA with the chimpanzees. A large chunk of that DNA is "junk". We possess DNA to grow a tail, but it's simply "switched" off. How do you explain that? Why would we have that redundant DNA if we don't use it? Evolution explains this very well: because our ancestors are apes with tails. Through time and evolution, we lost the need to grow a tail. Oh and newsflash: we're apes too.
isamu135 1 year ago
@isamu135
All the motor car are designed. They share 99% similar materials. Their engine are similar May I said my sunny is evolve to BMW?
Why evolution stop now? why no chimpanzees evolve to another transactional species?
98% is the genomic divergences between human and chipz. Not the whole DNA sequence. Chipz have 24 pair chromosomes, How can we compare 2 seq. in difference size? You said something you don't have evidence. superstition? 迷信?
alfredjan27 1 year ago
@alfredjan27 It took you 6 months to come back with this bullshit analogy? You're comparing machines that are man made that can't reproduce on itself naturally with living beings? You obviously don't understand evolution, genetics, DNA, natural selection, biology or even nature in the first place. I'm not even going to educate you. You're a grown man, do your own research (what you should've done the past 6 months). Check out what REAL scientists (not pastors, priests etc) say about it. Goodbye.
isamu135 1 year ago
@isamu135
It took 6 minutes to read your post and reply.
I don't know much, I admit it. So you are educated and you know so much, I hope you can show me how to create a live cell from inorganic. Don't take out something from a live cell, and create so call Man-made life to fool me. Thanks.
alfredjan27 1 year ago
1/2
Creationism should never be taught at school, because it's simply not science at all. Creationism starts with a pre-assumption of what the facts are which can't be tested. That is not how science works. Simply put, what's not testable or observable, is not science. Evolution is, because it is tested and observed numerous times. We mortals "don't" see it happen, because it takes millions of years to see any significant changes.
isamu135 1 year ago
really hate those guys made up evidences to support their presumed idea of evolution
newtestube 2 years ago
and where's your proof in what you believe in?
emkplayboy6 2 years ago 2
They can't proof evolution is true either, besides keep promoting (or brainwashing) it as a fact. You can believe it if you want to, but it doesn't make this theory a fact.
I only know that a building cannot exist without the works of builders. NOTHING in the world just exists somehow without the work of some people.
newtestube 2 years ago
I'm not promoting anything from either sides i beleive in what i beleive in so you getting all offensive is very typical of an ignorant person.
emkplayboy6 2 years ago
LOL
Right away you say I am an ignorant person, that tells me something.
I don't get offensive, I just don't waste time believe in non sense, or any kind of propaganda.
newtestube 2 years ago
Well I can agree with that i don't like hype non sense/bs or propaganda. But still you can rule out anything cause WE dont KNOW we want to think we know but we don't & who knows when we ever will know maybe thats what death is, transition, who knows!
emkplayboy6 2 years ago
question
If we cannot rule anything out, then why are we ruling creationism out?
newtestube 2 years ago
Well I never ruled that out thats the thing, I've taken this into consideration too! But... my beleives have been changing and i'm confused in what to beleive in. I think it's really a mixture of things. By creationism what are you speaking of exactly just to be sure?
emkplayboy6 2 years ago
That's is what I think school's policy should be. Teach kids BOTH theories, then they can choose which one to believe, instead of only one theory is allowed. That is not education, that is indoctrination.
By creationism, I myself believe the biblical 6000 years young earth creation.
newtestube 2 years ago
see the last past yourself..
You'll find it
Plz don't say things like this before you've already watched the whole set.
aaronars3 1 year ago
科學角度?收皮吧
mygodzilla 2 years ago 2
冇學識、冇教養、冇邏輯
it seems that you're that guy
aaronars3 1 year ago
唔好持住自己係基督徒就以為自己高人一等
你依家彈幾舊無証據ge指控想點?
又英文又中文x_x
打英文出來學識就好高?
係咪想話所有夠膽出聲基督教係錯ge都係冇學識、冇教養、冇邏輯
以你角度來睇係ge
同樣
以我角度你地都係
都係嗰句
收皮啦
mygodzilla 11 months ago