Added: 2 years ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 17,766
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now Roger, only Davis Cup and Olympics (Singles) remain. You can do it.

  • Funny looking bak at the 08 french open final interview and then looking at this, sadness to happiness, so happy for him!!!! :)

  • Roger Federer Best. I love Roger

  • The main thing about this vid is Federer won, nadal got beaten by a better player and then that player got blitz by federer! case closed!

  • im a huge fed fan, but it deosnt work like that

  • Exactly the head to head is overrated Sampras has a losing record against Stich does that mean Stich is better then Sampras? Obviously the answer is no. Federer won this French Open fair and square and that's a fact.

  • Federer is the best tennis player ever, so HA mister nadal :-D

  • @ChirnefD you 12?

  • But Federer has won gold in doubles, so HA mister Nadal...

  • H2H record is overrated. At the end of day, only consistency and who gets to win the most slam titles that counts. no one in their freaking mind in 5 or 10 years would still be talking about h2h battles. Graf lost to Seles every time before the stabbing. Graf in the end benefited from Seles' absence and ended up winning the most slams by a tennis player ever. And who exactly remembers and says "hey didn't graf use to lose to seles a lot" when everytime graf's name brought into discussion? Never

  • ok let me ask you this...does all the other players who are now called the GREATEST have good win-loss record against all the other players while he was on tour..you cant take win-loss record against a single player as a criterian to find the greatest ever..its consistency tht matters..and also hiscompetitiveness on all the surface..

  • No, styles make fights. Federer has Soderling's number. Maybe he'll get him one day, but not in a slam.

    Soderling's the real deal, however, and he's proven that with his run at Wimbledon...

    ...which was also ended by Federer.

  • Yeah, before he learned the tips how to beat him, he would have won 17 slams and be about to reach his retirement year.

  • You are the best and i happy to see you win

  • u r simply the best..making 20 consecutive semifinals of with he reached 18 finals and won 14..i think its an incredible record...federer was consistent enough to reach the finals for the 4th time..take it tht way and you wil understand he deserves to win this title.

  • Very good argument and its one i think about alot too...we all know nadal is arguably the greatest player ever on clay and that rogers favourite tournament is wimbleton..although roger has never beaten rafa on rolland garros he has beaten more then once on clay ie madrid this yr..rafa needed everything he had to beat roger in auz 09 and wimbleton 08..i think no one can denounce rogers greatness but how we define the best ever is def a matter of opinion

  • Also i think Roger is the only player to be able to take Rafa to five sets in a grand slam final apart from the french open, I don't think Djokovic or Murray would be able to keep up with Nadal in a final

  • if you think that h2h matters in this kind of situacion then tell me.. nalbandian and balek are better than nadal? because they own him on head 2 head.. wtf ? murray own federer on h2h.. that means that he's better than him? i think murray is not even 1% of federer. in tenis it's all about consistency.. and federer have all that.. 20 straight semifinals or better .. say's all ! :)

  • well for me it's quite simple..

    It's 2009 fed after 10 years of professional career has won everything.He won everybody but one player opposed his dominance.But we don't know if nadal's best years are ahead of him or not.If they aren't i'm sorry but he is not the best player between the 2.If they are well i think that if he continues like he did the last 2 years 10 slams are not a difficult task for him.And then we will know for sure..

  • "i'm sorry but he is not the best player between the 2" and that's because i believe that only the best can stay at top of his game for a long period of time.If nadal stops at like 9 or 10 slams then sry but this isn't enough.And don't tell me about his 4 consecutive rg because he was born with that talent.

  • YOU ARE THE BEST

  • If Sampras, Agassi, McEnroe and Borg Courier, Safin, Nadal and Soderling have pronounced Federer as "The Greatest of All Time" then who are you, who are we to argue? Does Sampras have a Roland Garros title? Does Sampras have an Olympic medal of any color?
  • ROGER FEDERER IS THE GOAT!!!!=)

  • Nice try attention-seeker, but nobody cares about your attempts.

  • Roger deserves every single conquer he fights for...he is not just a special player...as a citizen he is also to be respected ! His attitude and his concern about his foundation in south Africa...he is an example of a human beeing still at such young age got the bless to look aroung and realize that the world needed more than his magic ability with the racquet...and so he was also endowed with a special feeling...that i hope could be captured for other top players at any sport !

  • Excellent comment

  • i would have been

  • he must have been elated when nadal lost

  • congrats RF. well deserved.

  • go paste your dick in yo moms pussy ha ha

  • what the fuck is ur problem? ur just another jackass on youtube who thinks he's all high and mighty because he can type some cuss words in the comment box. well guess what, ur really are no t as awesome as u think u are. my advice is that u keep ur comments to yourself and dont try to piss other people off.

  • i got one question for you..did you see anything scary in your comments after posting this "spam msg" on this video??

  • RF.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more