the difference between a weak and strong atheist is that a weak atheist doesnt believe god exists but still thinks about god as a thing and have feelings as if a god could be real. a strong atheist believes there was never a god in the first place.
pretty good you were fair in some areas, then you throw in your beliefs which opens new discussions. really i think this defintion of a weak atheist is bullshit and seems agnostic, you know the entire LACK shit, they call it weak I call it bullshit. they have this definition so people won't tell them "we don't know for sure their could be a god" which is true and to say otherwise makes you stubborn and dense, so thus the new defintion weak atheist. Bullshit!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ummm agnostics and weak athiests should just commit to one or the other. I mean, how much of a vagina can you be? "I dont know what side to take because i dont wanna be wrong."-agnostics Grow a pair already!
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I hope you're kidding! Calling agnostics a vagina is all you have? Maybe some people say they are agnostic because the whole (a)theism debate is as bogus as arguing who's more powerful, Zeus or Thor? There is no point without evidence. And while I agree with the idea that the lack of evidence IS evidence for the atheists, which is why I don't BELIEVE in a god, I still can not say that factually there is no god. Which makes agnosticism the only LOGICAL choice.
the difference between a weak and strong atheist is that a weak atheist doesnt believe god exists but still thinks about god as a thing and have feelings as if a god could be real. a strong atheist believes there was never a god in the first place.
JesusManPowerKick 1 month ago
pretty good you were fair in some areas, then you throw in your beliefs which opens new discussions. really i think this defintion of a weak atheist is bullshit and seems agnostic, you know the entire LACK shit, they call it weak I call it bullshit. they have this definition so people won't tell them "we don't know for sure their could be a god" which is true and to say otherwise makes you stubborn and dense, so thus the new defintion weak atheist. Bullshit!
BruceGiron 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ummm agnostics and weak athiests should just commit to one or the other. I mean, how much of a vagina can you be? "I dont know what side to take because i dont wanna be wrong."-agnostics Grow a pair already!
hip2hate 4 years ago
you suck it is ignorant to believe that you have to commit totally to theism or athiesm.
xclumsyangelx 4 years ago
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I hope you're kidding! Calling agnostics a vagina is all you have? Maybe some people say they are agnostic because the whole (a)theism debate is as bogus as arguing who's more powerful, Zeus or Thor? There is no point without evidence. And while I agree with the idea that the lack of evidence IS evidence for the atheists, which is why I don't BELIEVE in a god, I still can not say that factually there is no god. Which makes agnosticism the only LOGICAL choice.
AmnRyanChase 4 years ago 2
Nice points. Similar to my position. Existance of God is improbable to me but I do not discount its possibility.
AzureDrag0n1 4 years ago
Maybe this is splitting hairs, but Theists don't say that God is magic.
mandalovesmambo 5 years ago