The engine looks great but i think it needs to render its shadows a little better....and not trying to start a console war or anything but i think it works a little better on ps3 (for now at least) because compare the mountain in 1:20 on xbox and 1:23 on ps3...because you can see tht the trees on the mountain rendered a bit more on the ps3 than xbox, but we all know pc will be dominating this engine....
I think a mix of photo realistic graphics (as seen in Avatar and Happy Feet) and more interaction and feedback as in the Wii and Natal. And it would be cool to have gyros that add force to wiimote.
i will not buy and no download this game this game do not deserve that . this is yust crysis 1 mission pack and it goes for consoles fuck from epic game they made console garbage. Crysis is becoming myth.sry for spelliNG
CryEngine 3 on the consoles looks like absolute shit- and looks like PC titles we had 5 or 6 years- Come on, we expected this from EA or some other big company sell out but not Crytek which pioneered Real Time lighting and graphics engines with the Original Far Cry which brought real time lighting and photo realism graphics before Half Life 2 and Doom 3 and was the first to bring Dynamic Super Realism with its Cry Engine 2 Crysis technology- now they are going backwards...wtf...
Don't worry, just like CryEngine 2, CryEngine 3 is scaleable. So consoles will probably have medium quality textures and polygons with no filters. High end PC gamers will still have the option to choose Ultra High 8x AA, 16xAF. Just be thankful Crysis 2 isn't coming to the Wii. I would like to see a more powerful Wii thought, that would be a kick-ass gaming experience. I guess we just have to wait.
Hard core PC gamers hate the fact crytec is developing for consols because consols are about 6 years behind in graphics so crysis 2 will only look as good on PC as it's weakest link being the 120$ poor noob 360 which is uber gay cause I put 2000$ into my pc and I need another awsome game from crytech that it deserves
Well, the pc engine is obviously more tweaked and full of features the console version of the engine can't do =So pc version will look ALOT better than console versions.
@GoodDay2YouSir Fortunatly you couldn't be more wrong about that... while the two console version will not look as good, the PC version of cryengine 3 is much more to date and will look FANtASTIC.
haha yea thats pretty much the name :P direct ( x box 360 ) and i think ps3 is open gl anway it doesnt matter :P i was just bored so i wanted topost a comment XD
You know all the hype, and when the game is release on the pc, you won't need a super rig to play it on. I play crysis and warhead on pci cards just fine and i am talking about a 2400 or 8400gs at that. lol
Well from what i could make of it they looked exactly the same except the ps3 looked like it had the contrast turned up a bit higher and a lower frame rate on a few occasions.
You dont even know what your talking about . a gtx 295 can run this perfectly with no lag with the original engine. So with this engine it will be like a fart.
im strictly a pc gamer but on the topic of xbox 360 vs ps3 i have to say ps3 has the upper hand look at 1:16 onwards you can see the xbox 360 is having problems with shadows (as well as the falling tree part) there are lots of shadows jumping up in places and if you look accros to the mountain no trees are rendered there but on the ps3 side its shadows arent glitched and if you look accros to the mountain some small trees are being rendered it has a logner view distance
I'm gonna have to say that PS3 looks better..I'm not a fan boy for either one..except for that PC will always be better..but I do like the PS3 better for some reason..although I have all 3 and play them all :D
When it got to the part in the woods with the waterfall for PS3..(right after they were shooting the water for 360)...the waterfall looked so real lol
PC is allways better than xbox360 or ps3... crysis 2 will be released march 2010(PC,360,ps3) then all ppl can see that the pc have better graphics.....
its may have dx 11 support then because the cards goming out verry soon....
I think everyone knows that a PC is waaay more powerful, in fact a 360 aint powerful at all.
But it doesnt have to be, when a game is developed for a specific system like the ps3 or 360 it still looks great since they (games) are generally pretty well optimized.
One example is GTA4, looks and runs good on consoles, but plays like shit on PC =)
any normal 700-1000 dollar rig can run this, it looks exactly the same if not worse than the hp mod. So please don't say " OMG THEY ARE USING FREAKING 3 WAY 295's" because it is not that impressive.
Definitely not a console. Those are mainstream gaming machines pre built for a low price, PCs are expensive because they can outdo consoles. Consoles play at resolutions of 1280x720 while PCs can play up to 2560x1600
Whats with the Xbox360 and PS3 logos at the bottom al the time, Neither the 360 or the PS3 has enough grunt to run Cryenggine 2, now how are they gonna hande cryengine 3. This is probably DX11 @ work, so if neither of these 'next gen' consoles can handle a 2-year old game, how are they gona handle something which is alot more sophisticated?
BTW I own a 360, and it's great, at least it was until I got my PC(HD3870 OC'd, C2Q Q9300, 2GB RAM) and thats old stuff but it outperforms both the 360&PS3
I've played games in DX 10.1, assassins creed(yes, it does support it unofficially), TC HAWX etc. It looks great and performs very well but it doesnt look like this. DX 10.1 is nothing like DX11. It looks like regular DX10, but it performs better. I think DX10.1 is like 'The DX10 we've always wanted'. BTW can anyone tell me if Battlefield Bad Company 1 or 2 is coming out on PC?
The main reason why Crysis wouldn't run on the consoles is because of it's highly advanced textures alongside the other effects the cryengine 2 was capable of if you had a good enough PC.
Cryss FTW, trust me, it's better than any normal shooter out there. Of course, if you're into roleplay then be it, but try this game out, it certainly got me into the fps genre
you get a significant performance increase running crysis under this engine. it would be impossible to pull it off like this on a 360 otherwise. while not as powerful as the tech5 engine, it's still impressive.
Did Crysis take the gaming to a new level ? No, it took the graphics to a new level NOT the gameplay as many hyped it to, and terefore many people got disappointed when it came out.
Will CryEngine3 take the console gaming to a new level? Hell no, it'll make the graphics better for sure, but taking the gameplay to a new level needs to be done by pixies and santa.
So don't expect the world to change just because graphics gets enhanced.
And for the record: A discussion usually starts with someone who states his or her opinion and from there, people agrees or disagrees, which leads to other statements.
Haha :P No man, I think it's good you are taking this subject to discussion. Then people can see that just because graphics get's better, it doesn't mean that the gameplay follows.
its amazing how I enjoyed zelda on the n64 back in the day. Graphics were not really that important back then... Now I pay attention to a game's graphics and make an opinion on the gameplay afterwards.... Besides halo 3 lol
OH damn go away I cant hear the discussion for the thounds time. No the graphic doesnt take the gameplay to a new level, but the engine makes things possible which were impossible before it. Just look on the huge levels in crysis
it looks gross here.
turgore 4 months ago
1º- PC
2º- PS3
3º- XBOX 360
GustavoRodrigo15 9 months ago
@GustavoRodrigo15 why ?
turgore 4 months ago
Comment removed
jeabreg 10 months ago
@jeabreg Right you are, input lag and bad controls due to iffy framerates.
teckim 10 months ago
Cryengine 3 will ofc be better on pc, but i think for console gamers, it will still provide a very good experience!
Claudiosantosv1 1 year ago
Crysis 2 will be a must buy for my PS3
exon576 1 year ago
i think cryengine 2 looks the same and if you set it to very high then it looks like cryengine 3
bringingbettergaming 1 year ago
The engine looks great but i think it needs to render its shadows a little better....and not trying to start a console war or anything but i think it works a little better on ps3 (for now at least) because compare the mountain in 1:20 on xbox and 1:23 on ps3...because you can see tht the trees on the mountain rendered a bit more on the ps3 than xbox, but we all know pc will be dominating this engine....
iwhbyd11 1 year ago
My Geforcee Fx5200 can render this without a lag...
lolo lol
devilmaycry316619 1 year ago
cry engine 2 looks better imo
Zanith50 1 year ago
I think a mix of photo realistic graphics (as seen in Avatar and Happy Feet) and more interaction and feedback as in the Wii and Natal. And it would be cool to have gyros that add force to wiimote.
theknowbody 1 year ago
i will not buy and no download this game this game do not deserve that . this is yust crysis 1 mission pack and it goes for consoles fuck from epic game they made console garbage. Crysis is becoming myth.sry for spelliNG
gamer3386 2 years ago
@gamer3386
you're such an idiot, its not the game
its only to show what teh engine can do.
get your head out of your ass.
solidsnakejt 2 years ago
Thank you =)
teckim 2 years ago
@teckim
those people are annoying, not doing research on anything and always talking shit before thinking...lol
solidsnakejt 2 years ago
@solidsnakejt this engine can do shit xD
gamer3386 2 years ago
CryEngine 3 on the consoles looks like absolute shit- and looks like PC titles we had 5 or 6 years- Come on, we expected this from EA or some other big company sell out but not Crytek which pioneered Real Time lighting and graphics engines with the Original Far Cry which brought real time lighting and photo realism graphics before Half Life 2 and Doom 3 and was the first to bring Dynamic Super Realism with its Cry Engine 2 Crysis technology- now they are going backwards...wtf...
illmagnified 2 years ago 3
Don't worry, just like CryEngine 2, CryEngine 3 is scaleable. So consoles will probably have medium quality textures and polygons with no filters. High end PC gamers will still have the option to choose Ultra High 8x AA, 16xAF. Just be thankful Crysis 2 isn't coming to the Wii. I would like to see a more powerful Wii thought, that would be a kick-ass gaming experience. I guess we just have to wait.
webmessia 1 year ago
Hard core PC gamers hate the fact crytec is developing for consols because consols are about 6 years behind in graphics so crysis 2 will only look as good on PC as it's weakest link being the 120$ poor noob 360 which is uber gay cause I put 2000$ into my pc and I need another awsome game from crytech that it deserves
GoodDay2YouSir 2 years ago 10
Well, the pc engine is obviously more tweaked and full of features the console version of the engine can't do =So pc version will look ALOT better than console versions.
teckim 2 years ago 3
lets hope
luck111 2 years ago
@GoodDay2YouSir Fortunatly you couldn't be more wrong about that... while the two console version will not look as good, the PC version of cryengine 3 is much more to date and will look FANtASTIC.
HACKSHED 1 year ago
ps3 and 360 got DX9 custom build for consoles but i have 2 say 4 playing crysyis on a console it looks pretty dam good
alltimegamer247 2 years ago
as far as i know i thought the ps3 was built on open gl?
aaronplayesdrums 2 years ago
i think dx9 is for 360 idk about the ps3 sory
alltimegamer247 2 years ago
haha yea thats pretty much the name :P direct ( x box 360 ) and i think ps3 is open gl anway it doesnt matter :P i was just bored so i wanted topost a comment XD
aaronplayesdrums 2 years ago
i think this will be the first real challenge for consoles (graphically speaking)
riveraluciano 2 years ago
You know all the hype, and when the game is release on the pc, you won't need a super rig to play it on. I play crysis and warhead on pci cards just fine and i am talking about a 2400 or 8400gs at that. lol
Great video tho, the visuals does look better.
MysteryRidahz 2 years ago
but what resolution and what graphical quality?
ScrewFearMe 2 years ago
answer to description :
definitely (is that the wrong spelling btw?)
1ManArmy786 2 years ago
th difference between 360 an ps3 is clear.
ps3 is visually better than 360
cacassser 2 years ago
Well from what i could make of it they looked exactly the same except the ps3 looked like it had the contrast turned up a bit higher and a lower frame rate on a few occasions.
pelvist 2 years ago
Actually if you look at 1:20 you can see the difference in the trees draw distance for example
s3dnas 2 years ago
Both the console versions still look the same to me and i dont see any diference between the two in draw distance.
pelvist 2 years ago
Damn true
LamarsaElectro 2 years ago
i want to see a gtx 295 cry trying to run this
Feder147 2 years ago
You dont even know what your talking about . a gtx 295 can run this perfectly with no lag with the original engine. So with this engine it will be like a fart.
crotte56 2 years ago
If the 295 were to struggle running this then there is no way todays consoles could. It doesnt even look as good as the original crysis IMO.
pelvist 2 years ago 3
notice how the blue barrel pops out of nowhere :P
1:44
datoprdu 2 years ago 2
how come thats using the crysis warhead music ?
BTW, love the new gun for crysis 2 ;)
bigsnakedotcom 2 years ago
im strictly a pc gamer but on the topic of xbox 360 vs ps3 i have to say ps3 has the upper hand look at 1:16 onwards you can see the xbox 360 is having problems with shadows (as well as the falling tree part) there are lots of shadows jumping up in places and if you look accros to the mountain no trees are rendered there but on the ps3 side its shadows arent glitched and if you look accros to the mountain some small trees are being rendered it has a logner view distance
lorecan 2 years ago
That's f-ing amazing
Etherian1977 2 years ago
cryengine 2 looks better on pc.
Hotrod768 2 years ago 2
Omg ofc it does.......
teckim 2 years ago
I'm gonna have to say that PS3 looks better..I'm not a fan boy for either one..except for that PC will always be better..but I do like the PS3 better for some reason..although I have all 3 and play them all :D
oshaugh2209 2 years ago 2
When it got to the part in the woods with the waterfall for PS3..(right after they were shooting the water for 360)...the waterfall looked so real lol
oshaugh2209 2 years ago
Hmm i would choose for the
Frostbite engine
Used in Battlefield Bad Company
And in Battlefield 1943
Alirocks0 2 years ago
This video only shows the console versions, so we know nothing about what the engine is REALLY capable of ;D
henrysmfilms 2 years ago 9
esto que es el supuesto crysis para consolas . pos valla mierda de grafias jaja compraros una pc y esperaros a que saquen las GTX 350 xD saludos
xXxTr0xXx 2 years ago
perfect for the elder scrolls 5
dooshtoomun 2 years ago
I thought about the same ;) ....that would be a great game
Dindzr 2 years ago
PC is allways better than xbox360 or ps3... crysis 2 will be released march 2010(PC,360,ps3) then all ppl can see that the pc have better graphics.....
its may have dx 11 support then because the cards goming out verry soon....
xloggerx 2 years ago
I think everyone knows that a PC is waaay more powerful, in fact a 360 aint powerful at all.
But it doesnt have to be, when a game is developed for a specific system like the ps3 or 360 it still looks great since they (games) are generally pretty well optimized.
One example is GTA4, looks and runs good on consoles, but plays like shit on PC =)
/tcm
teckim 2 years ago
plays shit on pc.. not on mine
1ManArmy786 2 years ago
ofc it doesnt
teckim 2 years ago
Plays like shit on pc if u have a shit PC and have never heard of preventative maintenence.
It plays great on mine too.
pelvist 2 years ago
I just built a new PC, and now GTA4 looks fucking beautiful :)
Part of me wishes i could go into a 5 year coma, just to see what games are like in 2014
Diorama42 2 years ago 3
which pc did you build ?
malaguenabeni 2 years ago
any normal 700-1000 dollar rig can run this, it looks exactly the same if not worse than the hp mod. So please don't say " OMG THEY ARE USING FREAKING 3 WAY 295's" because it is not that impressive.
spartan1081990 2 years ago
Hahaha...why do you waste your time?
Console kids know nothing of hardware that's why they buy consoles
corbono35 2 years ago 3
haha, I know I Know...
spartan1081990 2 years ago
who do you call console kid?
im not a kid and i play more on the PC.
And actually i know alot about hardware so yea, dont be an ass.
teckim 2 years ago
Well said.
pelvist 2 years ago
Here's whats funny about the video, theres no AA
tbsdrummer87 2 years ago
WOW at like 1:56 that looks real.
Milkshakman 2 years ago
There's just no way these vids are on a 360 OR a PS3.. that's incredible.
michaeld163 2 years ago
PC's, though costing a huge amount more than a 360 or PS3 can far surpass both of them.
Hell, this was probably made on a supercomputer, and I'm not exaggurating.
Milkshakman 2 years ago
Definitely not a console. Those are mainstream gaming machines pre built for a low price, PCs are expensive because they can outdo consoles. Consoles play at resolutions of 1280x720 while PCs can play up to 2560x1600
tbsdrummer87 2 years ago
What The FUck!??!?!?!
WHat Kind oF A SYSTEM DO THE FUCKING DEVELOPERS HAVE!!??!?!
A SKULL TRAIL x2?!?!!?
8 4870x2 or 295 GTX's?!?!?
Omg God....
10000 GB RAM!?!?!?
WTF!?
photon101203 2 years ago
2 gtx295 with 16gb ram cud run this
hellobooom 2 years ago
Lol the funny thing is video games are surpassing what can handle them.
Milkshakman 2 years ago
Not as cool as CE2 but it will be cool when PC footage of CE3 will be released.
PcGamer4ever1 2 years ago
the wather looke fucking awsome !!!
alex240390 2 years ago
WTF??!! :o Look at the falling water on 2:20 :O
Qbite 2 years ago
looks amazing on 360. even better on ps3. XD
farter1a2b3c 2 years ago
Whats with the Xbox360 and PS3 logos at the bottom al the time, Neither the 360 or the PS3 has enough grunt to run Cryenggine 2, now how are they gonna hande cryengine 3. This is probably DX11 @ work, so if neither of these 'next gen' consoles can handle a 2-year old game, how are they gona handle something which is alot more sophisticated?
BTW I own a 360, and it's great, at least it was until I got my PC(HD3870 OC'd, C2Q Q9300, 2GB RAM) and thats old stuff but it outperforms both the 360&PS3
Crixali17 2 years ago 3
DX 10.1 aka 11 i guess is what im turning up. gives about a 20-30% performance increase its quite weird i dont understand why ir does?
Barrowood0002 2 years ago
I've played games in DX 10.1, assassins creed(yes, it does support it unofficially), TC HAWX etc. It looks great and performs very well but it doesnt look like this. DX 10.1 is nothing like DX11. It looks like regular DX10, but it performs better. I think DX10.1 is like 'The DX10 we've always wanted'. BTW can anyone tell me if Battlefield Bad Company 1 or 2 is coming out on PC?
Crixali17 2 years ago
Hmm Its Name SUits it
"CRYENGINE"
Yep This Engine WIll MAke Any COnsole or latest PC CRY ...
photon101203 2 years ago
This is for consoles, so it ain't as good as CryEngine 2.
Danieldeng 2 years ago 6
Correct.
teckim 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not as cool as CE2 but it will be cool when PC footage of CE3 will be released
PcGamer4ever1 2 years ago
Not as cool as CE2 but it will be cool when PC footage of CE3 will be released
PcGamer4ever1 2 years ago 2
hmmm, nothing special ;]
neoonik16 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Not as cool as CE2 but it will be cool when PC footage of CE3 will be released
PcGamer4ever1 2 years ago
If this is Crysis then I'll jump off the bridge above Danube.
StokaSR 2 years ago
LOVE YOU CRYTEK!!!
zedisgreat3 2 years ago
horrible slowdown and framerates, and i dont really see an improvement over crysis on my pc...
stoneddemonicpirate 2 years ago
The main reason why Crysis wouldn't run on the consoles is because of it's highly advanced textures alongside the other effects the cryengine 2 was capable of if you had a good enough PC.
Arkaha 2 years ago
That's why Cryengine 3 has toned down some stuff but improved some other stuff which equals "Crysis on shitty comp/Xbox 360/PS3"
dingumfCallofDuty 2 years ago 3
c.u.d.a.a.t.s. for xbox 360 and ps3 lol
jorge69696 2 years ago
gay shooters... u dont look at ambient visuals nobody does!
when they take this fukn awesome engine and programming an epic roleplay like oblivion, god..
polarkreis201 2 years ago
Cryss FTW, trust me, it's better than any normal shooter out there. Of course, if you're into roleplay then be it, but try this game out, it certainly got me into the fps genre
tarkinfish 2 years ago
dam is this directx11?
UndeadGunz 2 years ago
you get a significant performance increase running crysis under this engine. it would be impossible to pull it off like this on a 360 otherwise. while not as powerful as the tech5 engine, it's still impressive.
naryanr 2 years ago
it's on xbox360 ps3 and PC
Cobac 2 years ago 2
No, this video is of the console versions, not pc.
But the Game Engine is for all 3.
teckim 2 years ago
HOLY SHIT I just crapt my pants O.O
roberthdk 2 years ago
it looks very nice!! but i want to know the hardware of the testsystem ;)
mfg
Duebi21 2 years ago
it's xbox 360 and ps3 ;)
teckim 2 years ago
pf suck! ^^
wow1wow2 2 years ago
gulu moz suck
pfchiang4501 2 years ago
froz u suck, judas u too
wow1wow2 2 years ago
Did Crysis take the gaming to a new level ? No, it took the graphics to a new level NOT the gameplay as many hyped it to, and terefore many people got disappointed when it came out.
Will CryEngine3 take the console gaming to a new level? Hell no, it'll make the graphics better for sure, but taking the gameplay to a new level needs to be done by pixies and santa.
So don't expect the world to change just because graphics gets enhanced.
Tenkin89 2 years ago
This is only for discussion, no need to get excited ;)
But i agree with you.
teckim 2 years ago
Excited ? :S
And for the record: A discussion usually starts with someone who states his or her opinion and from there, people agrees or disagrees, which leads to other statements.
:)
Tenkin89 2 years ago
Yes you are right, sounded to me that you didn't like my " will it take console gaming to the next level?" statement =)
teckim 2 years ago
Haha :P No man, I think it's good you are taking this subject to discussion. Then people can see that just because graphics get's better, it doesn't mean that the gameplay follows.
Tenkin89 2 years ago
its amazing how I enjoyed zelda on the n64 back in the day. Graphics were not really that important back then... Now I pay attention to a game's graphics and make an opinion on the gameplay afterwards.... Besides halo 3 lol
Turk013 2 years ago
OH damn go away I cant hear the discussion for the thounds time. No the graphic doesnt take the gameplay to a new level, but the engine makes things possible which were impossible before it. Just look on the huge levels in crysis
marty5667 2 years ago
What did you mean with "OH damn go away I cant hear the discussion for the thounds time. " ?
Tenkin89 2 years ago
I would like to know aswell =D
teckim 2 years ago
I meant that i´m upset that i´ve to discuss this thousand times
marty5667 2 years ago
Yes it's booring, but also interesting.
teckim 2 years ago
Then don't discuss it ? Just stfu and gtfo.
Tenkin89 2 years ago
yeah but if you dont discuss, you´ll only read bad things on crysis
marty5667 2 years ago
No you won't. I love this game. I thinks it's well made. The whole concept is great, and I think is must have been a tough game to make.
Everything is new, and I hate people who complain when they aren't really thinking.
Tenkin89 2 years ago
i agree at all
marty5667 2 years ago