This is stupidity. Most of the jet fuel was burning on the other side of the tower, not the impact zone. People don't jump from almost 1,300 feet in the air if they're all comfy cozy. They had no idea the buildings would collapse. They jumped to their deaths because it was unbearable to be up there.
The Windsor Tower was not under construction, as they say here. Its construction was completed in 1979. Moreover, the structure of Windsor was made of concrete, much more resistant to fire than steel of the Twin Towers. I hope the rest of the information in this documentary of which I have no idea, will be more accurate.
How is this Dario Fo, Nobel Prize winnder and all, qualified to speak about technical matters of the towers collapsin? He is an Italian satirist, playwright, theater director, actor and composer, nothing more, nothing less. He is not an engineer nor was he involved or knows any more details than those details which are available to the public. Still cannot imagine why his "voice" needs to be in this video supposedly dealing with the true investigation of 9/11.
The truth is if you believe in the OS and keep pushing that bs you are pissing on the people who died that day and all of the ones to die in future attacks. And guess what that may be me or you. Don't be so brain dead you douchebag, understand geopolitics, history, and do some actual research looking up his sources.
If you don't do that, you are a waste of oxygen so just stop spewing this OS bull.
@webmaster4435 Actual reaserch?! Main subject around this "debate" is burning of an EMPTY office building. Notice the word "empty". Now, what did those two plains hit?
An empty office building in downtown New York?
In not one single point does this Italian ACTOR say that papper,books, wooden desks, chairs, wall interior bur at certain temperature.
Again their claims are wrong and a person who uses his/hers brain corectly will notice what their true aim and goal is, these people are trash.
Set a papper on fire, see what happens, and then try to convince me that what these people are doing is the "real" science. I'm not trying hard at all it was quite easy with me limited knowlege to debunk these theories in 10 seconds into watching this "investigation".
@webmaster4435 And you belive in a documentary that had 0 facts straight, tell me that I should stop being braindead?! Sorry to burst your bubble but this is fake, Easter bunny is fake and sorry Santa isn't real too, fairy tales that exist in reality arent true. But I'm sadend that you feel that I'm waste of oxygen. Open your eyes not everything you see on TV has to be 100% correct.
The ONLY things debunked here is what you were told.it's so weak and the government hid all this info in their poor report they distributed months later.
All the key acts that PROVE this was an inside job were not written about or covered.
ALL you foold who continue to belive Osama Bin Laden did this, need to stop being spoon fed liesand see the truth.
I think the reason some still belive what they were 'told' happened is because MOST cannot comprehend that a country could DO this to it's own citizens.
The sad truth is THEY DID.!!!!!!!!!!!
I am not easily fooled and the facts and evidence shown demonstrates the odds of these collapses and attacks happening the way you were told is a about 1000-1.
Karma will bring this out in the end.
Those responsible won't get away with their cowardly actions either.
Wisdor tower did not fall because it did not sustain a large impact of a plane, Im sure the WTC if caught on fire would do the same thing. But due to the impacts on 9/11 it severely crippled both towers setting there own fate.
@pocomedy "Wisdor tower did not fall because it did not sustain a large impact of a plane, Im sure the WTC if caught on fire would do the same thing. But due to the impacts on 9/11 it severely crippled both towers setting there own fate."
Absolutely right, and crap like that is the reason nobody takes the truth movement seriously.
People who don't believe 9/11 was an inside job please tell me why? There is so much evidence that it was, the list of evidence is so overwhelming that one would have to write a 5000 page paper just to cover all of it! Why do you feel an urge to protect the Elites?
@Kmost213 "People who don't believe 9/11 was an inside job please tell me why? There is so much evidence that it was, the list of evidence is so overwhelming that one would have to write a 5000 page paper just to cover all of it! Why do you feel an urge to protect the Elites?"
@Kmost213 What evidence are you pointing on?! An empty disgarded building that wasn't even built, or an office building that had all kinds of stuff .....
These all are actors and a movie that is fictatious in every way and you are apperantly beliveing it, I guess you belive that Sanata claws and Easter Bunny is also real huh?
@Kmost213 Tell me, why would people from different places of the world meet at an airport , steal an plane and commit suicide ? How could America arrange this ? IF America would ask somebody to do it, they asked one would go to the media. IT would be a way harder hit fo the americans if they would know 100 percent that america wanted to kill thousands of people. america would just collaps.
Was the Windsor Tower hit by a plane? No? Then how can it be compared to the WTC? More than half of the support columns in each of the WTC buildings were severed by the impacts of the planes. How many support columns were severed in the Windsor Tower?
BTW, the Windsor Tower was built in 1979 so whatever was "under construction" was not related to the structure of the building...
Re: Paul Craig Roberts...Who cares what an economist thinks about the collapse of the WTC? This video is a joke.
@MDkid1 wikipedia "operation northwoods" this is nothing new. Look at how the world has changed since 911.....look at the patriot act....look at the defense budget, gone from 290 billion in 2000 to 700 billion today....during the whole of the 1990s the budget was stuck at around 290 to 300 billion and now its more than double. Money and oil my friend money and oil. Remember "the love of money is the root of all evil" This has been going on really for a long time.
@edwardstim They didn't need to take down the WTC and kill 3,000 people to get the Patriot Act passed or increase the defense budget. One plane crashing into an empty field probably would've had the same effect. The pentagon crash by itself certainly would have. The deadliest act of terrorism on American soil, up until 9/11, was the OK City bombing, which killed 168 people. The Pentagon crash alone killed 189. Taking out the WTC was totally unnecessary.
@KayBeeEee1983 There is too make for me to say on here. The patriot act has nothing to do with stopping terrorism, neither does the airport security. I'll give you an example, Heathrow Airport. The head of security admitted on a BBC documentary that he security staff couldn't tell what a bomb looked like, and had no real chance of stopping such devices from getting through. On that same documentary a scientist show how easy it was to make a bomb from readily available chemicals that fits inside
@KayBeeEee1983 what about to invade the middle east. Have you read PNAC document have you read mearshimer and Walt paper on the Israel lobby? Have you seen the fox news reports on post 911 israeli spy arrests never again mentioned?
@KayBeeEee1983 "They didn't need to take down the WTC and kill 3,000 people" Yes they did, the attack had to be traumatic in the American psyche. For the last 10 years whenever any law regarding security is pushed they only have to mention 9/11 and it will be passed. Also, a plane crash into an empty field or the crash on the Pentagon alone wouldn't vindicate the invasions of Afghanistan or Iraq.
@manniman82 The Pentagon crash alone would've been the worst terrorist attack on US soil in history. Remember the Oklahoma City bombing? That was the previous record holder and it was pretty traumatic.
@KayBeeEee1983 Anyway, the reasons they did this is the last question that can be answered, what we can state though is that official story CANNOT be true...
@manniman82 The "official" story is more likely true than the "truth"er story. Controlled demolition and missile into the Pentagon ideas are laughably idiotic. What CANNOT be true about the "official" story?
@KayBeeEee1983 There is no truther story. We only know that the planes COULD NOT have brought down the towers, that it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon, that Norad's response was not according to protocol. Any theory i.e: controlled demolition or missile into Pentagon, it is just that, a theory at best but I would call it speculation. What is not speculation is that the Towers could not have collapsed due to the planes alone, it is and engineering fact...
@manniman82 "We only know that the planes COULD NOT have brought down the towers"
truthers are just like religious people. Their brains are simply not capable of understanding the immensity of the forces involved with the WTC plane crashes and collapses. Just as religious people don't believe in evolution because their brains are incapable of understanding the huge span of time that life has been on Earth.
@manniman82 "it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon"
Here's another way that truthers are like religious people. When truthers look at evidence, they absorb the evidence that coincides with their preconceived notions, and disregard the evidence that contradicts them. Just as religious people read the bible and absorb what they like and ignore the contradictions.
In this case, you're ignoring the 100+ people who were stuck in traffic and SAW a plane hit the Pentagon.
@KayBeeEee1983 Again, I base my opinions on facts and science not on beliefs or mass propaganda.
As for the eye witnesses, well I can't explain those accounts if in fact they are true but it shouldn't impede a proper independent investigation into the event.
@manniman82 "As for the eye witnesses, well I can't explain those accounts if in fact they are true"
You didn't even know there were 100+ eyewitnesses at the Pentagon, did you? XD
"I base my opinions on facts and science not on beliefs or mass propaganda."
Loose Change and Zero are stereotypical propaganda. They aim to manipulate their audience by creating an emotional response and only provide select evidence, all to further a specific political agenda.
@KayBeeEee1983 Actually the fact that people that question the official story are called unpatriotic and other names suggests that it is you that is manipulated by an emotional response.
Also, if a new investigation, a proper independent investigation, answers the important questions, is scientifically sound and ALL available documents (includes black boxes, recording tapes, eye witnesses, ect) are taken into account then I would approve with the conclusions.
@manniman82 "Actually the fact that people that question the official story are called unpatriotic and other names suggests that it is you that is manipulated by an emotional response."
The vast majority of people don't call people who question the "official" story unpatriotic. That just further shows what a seriously warped perception of reality you have. They call you a nutjob, stupid, a loser, a waste of oxygen, but not unpatriotic.
@KayBeeEee1983 I knew that there were eye witnesses to the Pentagon crash. Why do you assume I didn't know: just because I knew of those witnesses doesn't impede me from not believing, in general, the official story. It doesn't contradict that, overall, I don't believe the official story. I can ask you the same about people that heard explosions in WTC but I'm sure you, on the other hand, would invent some pseudo explanation for that...
@manniman82 "Why do you assume I didn't know: just because I knew of those witnesses doesn't impede me from not believing, in general, the official story."
Forget the official story. You said you don't believe a plane hit the pentagon. You're blatantly disregarding 100+ eyewitnesses, yet you're more apt to trust the people inside the WTC who said they heard explosions. This is why people laugh at you. Do you understand why? Do I have to explain it to you?
@manniman82 "I can ask you the same about people that heard explosions in WTC but I'm sure you, on the other hand, would invent some pseudo explanation for that... "
Did it ever occur to you that these explosions were just loud noises? Imagine, if you can, that a plane just hit the building you were in and you felt the building move so much that you thought it was going to topple over. When you're fleeing for your life, ANY loud noise is going to sound like an explosion to you.
@KayBeeEee1983 "Bullshit, if that were true you would've said that already and you would've explained WHY the towers couldn't have collapsed from the planes."
You want me to come on an internet site and flash my "badge" even before we start a discussion? You're ridiculous. You want to explain all the reasons why it is IMPOSSIBLE that the crashes caused the collapse?
@KayBeeEee1983 Anyway I'm done with you. You're prooving, without a shadow of a doubt, that America actually deserves to be lied to. We're too stupid, too gullible. Dogma and propaganda is too powerfull for the average American such as yourself. If you don't help progress at least don't block it... It's the least you can do!
@manniman82 And you're proving that truthers have no integrity whatsoever. You proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that truthers disregard evidence that contradicts their opinion. You trust people who say they heard explosions in the WTC, but ignore the 100+ people who SAW A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON. You're a complete joke.
@KayBeeEee1983 The only reason I bother with you is because the quicker people finally realize that the official 9/11 report IS NOT AN OPEN, INDEPENDENT, UNBIASED INVESTIGATION the quicker we can get this over with. Also the more time passes, the least likely it is that any new investigation will occur. Why are you opposed to any such investigation? Did you read the official report? Don't tell me that you call that a complete investigation for an event such as 9/11...
@manniman82 "Why are you opposed to any such investigation?"
It's unnecessary. We know the government knew terrorists were potentially planning to hijack planes and slam them into buildings. That's why NORAD had drills for it. But Bush didn't MAKE it happen. If he did, there wouldn't have been drills for it, and he would've acted more heroically on 9/11. He would've shot down at least one of the planes to make the Bush Admin look like heroes. Instead, they looked like incompetent buffoons.
@manniman82 "I finished my second year of Civil engeneering at Concordia University, Montreal, Canada."
LOL. Bullshit, if that were true you would've said that already and you would've explained WHY the towers couldn't have collapsed from the planes. Also, if that were true you would know that the planes certainly could have brought the towers down. You're just a trolling liar, like almost every truther is.
@KayBeeEee1983 Now if the collapse of the towers cannot be scientifically explained by the planes alone it logically means that something else occurred that we are not aware of. Like I said, there is no official truther story on what happened, only the real people who did this know what really happened. What we demand is a thorough independent investigation but the government doesn't want one and, obviously, the American public like you are so gullible.
@KayBeeEee1983 I've heard of dumb Americans before when I was abroad but didn't really believe it but I now fully understand what they are referring to. It's not so much dumb, unintelligent but more like "indoctrinated" into believing what the tube says. We were shoved the same lie thousands of times so much so that it becomes our reality. Get out of your comfort zone and ask the questions. Don't tell me that you genuinely believe that fairy tale? You're indoctrinated but not brain dead I hope!
@manniman82 "We were shoved the same lie thousands of times so much so that it becomes our reality."
Those lies have been coming from the truth movement. You've heard them say that a plane didn't hit the pentagon so many times that you believe it even in the face of 100+ eyewitnesses who claim they saw a plane. Watch a few documentaries that weren't put out by the truth movement. Ones with actual experts in the fields they talk about. Why is this video interviewing a playwright about physics?
@KayBeeEee1983 Just like there are experts that agree with the official story there as many that don't believe that it happened like that. For the last time, A PROPER INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CAN AND WILL KILL ALL DOUBT on what happened on 9/11. The official report IS NOT A COMPLETE AND INDEPENDENT investigation.
@manniman82 You need to go read my comments on part 1 because I'm not repeating it. The only fairy tale that is believed is the same one you believe....that a team of ninjas rigged 1,300 foot towers, obviously covertly. Impossible. Explosives not going off after jetliners crash into the rigged building? Impossible. According to you, we believe what we hear on TV (which is inaccurate in and of itself) as opposed to you, who believes what you hear on youtube videos, and conspiracy sites. Right.
@hamberg42 Prove what beyond a reasonable doubt? that the official explanation can't be true? Sure: ae911truth . org/
You'll have to research that site and follow the links and if you would have read my previous links you would have researched more on the claims they make (which are proven) and you wouldn't be asking me this. I won't spoon feed prepackaged info with a bias like CNN does, if you want the truth find out by yourself or remain ignorant. The choice is yours...
@manniman82 "The only fairy tale that is believed is the same one you believe....that a team of ninjas rigged 1,300 foot towers, obviously covertly. Impossible."
Prove it. The only thing that is impossible a symmetrical global collapse of 3 buildings caused by 2 airplanes.
@hamberg42 I think you meant to reply to WallStwizkid...
BTW there was plenty of opportunities to rig the buildings, I'm aware of these: there was an unprecedented major power outage 2 weeks before 9/11. Missing security tapes of the days before 9/11 have shown 3 vans coming at the same time of night in the underground parking lot (for 11 days) and departing before dawn. Their purpose is unknown (no repairs scheduled, ect). There was elevator maintenance a year before...plenty of opportunities.
@WallStwizkid BTW when the airliners crashed and exploded, the fuel caught on fire as well? But wait the official fairy tale says that both towers collapsed due to fires caused by the fuel...Only three buildings have ever collapsed due to office fires: you guessed it WTC1-2 and 7. BTW, Building 7 wasn't hit by plane...
This is what you believe: youtube . com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
and this is why you believe the official fairy tale: youtube . com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4
@WallStwizkid And just to let you know, youtube video are a great way to get informed. Like any other media, it is up to the user to verify sources, which I always do.
youtube . com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs
^^At least watch it and verify the information, this is my only goal...
@manniman82 Indoctrination - Churchill said the easiest way to rule a nation is through its music - the typical rythm of music in America is 96 beats per sec - which has been defined by NLP as "believe everything 'I' say"
it is creasy to think that still today on YOUTUBE,some people still comment on the fact that fire did bring those tours down and swearing to gods ,insulting others who believe this guy for example from labotories who ran tests that did not work,,,!!!????...WTF...!!!!who are those blind assholes...!!!!paid to harras truth movements maybe.facts are there,before our eyes.the world was fooled....!!!!
the truth is growing stronger. building 7 is the key. adverts on television promoting an independent enquiry from next month onwards to air around new york.
a government can be overthrown. the truth is growing stronger. building 7 is the key. adverts on television promoting an independent enquiry from next month onwards to air around new york.
@iChallengeUtoThink Simple motive: insurance fraud. More complex motive: covering up who really committed the attack as well as covering up other crimes of the elite and the Federal gov't.
Re 911 Conspiracy nuts as Bill Maher says "The problem is that the people with the most ridiculous ideas are always the people who are most certain of them."
why do the offical guys always go on about the outer facade being load bearing ? thats just fucked up ,therev are other vids that show the outer facade warping and they go "see there is the steel buckling and bending ...so is this where they got it from the NIST vid ....yeah and whats the score with the U.L. logo with the arrow flying into the cirlce ,thats a bit distasteful if they where involved with explaining this,fuckers
So 2 towers came down so SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTH / and both EXACTLY the same??? and then building 7 came down also so SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTH?? just from fire HHmmmmm , sounds fishy, its AMAZING how NORAD gets controlled by DICK CHEANY in 2001 ,and cant protect the skies on 911, BUT, BUT for the past 50 years B4 911 they would be in the skies in 2 minutes if a plane goes off course <<<<<< strange ??
@ZIONISTMAN1 The intact structures below the crash were designed to resist 3-5x their own mass. The only way such a symmetric collapse (implosion, really) could occur is by some simultaneous severing of the buildings' core structures. Here are peer-reviewed, forensic-evidence based articles now published in reputable scientific journals: journalof911studiesDOTcom/ ..... peace.
The Rockefellers built the Trade Center and we all know that the Illuminati has been planning a New World Order for over 200 years and 9/11 was planned long before it happened.Is it possible that thermite could have been placed near the steel columns when the building was actually constructed and designed in such a way the the fuses could be easily installed at any point in future time?For instance,a maze of capped off electrical pipe that leads to the thermite charges throughout the structures
I think that that is what most people want, I.m not nere to debate,fallout curse or any of that guff but I believethat a new and complete,and NON-PARTISAN investigation is definately and sorely needed if for nothing but to shut up the conspriracy buffs or to show to some people you should not take someone at their word just based on blind faith or thinking that it is not even remotely possible that you may have been lied to.This is owed to all americans, Let the chips fall where they may. Peace.
hsa been totally not willing to investigate and report other key facts tell me that it is either through some type of omission or comission that would make anyone feel we were not told everything. I I were the goverment and maintained the fact that pentagon was hit by an airplane controled by terrorist I would be willing to show more than just 5 frames of video that only raises more questions. I don't place blame on anyone or anybody, But people just want ALL the facts not just some or stories.
Let me correct you on something my friend, it's not that I am insecure nor do I feel the need to be in control of anything other than my life, but I will say to you that why is anyone who ask questions or even looks at the possibilty tha there may be more than one account to this story. Most npeople have eyes but they refuse to see, only believing what suits them. If you look at the pictures and the way that things were distorted in the official report,lack of funding, no main stream media that
How convenient that after the 11th of september that was never mentioned publicly again, Wake up people this wreaks of cover-up. No matter how much evidence comes out, some people are going to believe 911 was an inside job and some won't, A man convinced against his will is still of the same opinion after all that is their right as an American,OH i'm sorry,I forgot, we are losing those to as a result of these attacks. Unless we want to lose all of our rights, we need to wake up to the bullshit.
WE are in trouble if it is even remotejy possible that 19 nobodies could slip thought a trillion dollar military and intelligence infrastructure to pull of the most devastating attack on U.S soil in the history nation of the,what a waste of tax dollars. If people cannot see that 911 was in some way assisted, they are in denial, Free fall speeds, severe lack of plane wreckage at the Pentagon and Shanksville, and not to mention rumsfelds press conference on the 10th of 2 trillion dollars missing
@peeper63 'WE are in trouble if it is even remotejy possible that 19 nobodies could slip thought a trillion dollar military and intelligence infrastructure to pull of the most devastating attack on U.S soil in the history nation ' HAHA - and therein lyes the exact reason why we have so many conspiracists - because we can't bear the idea that '19 nobodies' managed to kill 3000 people so easily. You've inadvertedly exposed the reason why you are a conspiracist - fear of not being in control.
even though the towers were not engulfed in flames, they both had 28 thousand gallons of jet fuel burning inside of them. on top of that, the force of the impact cracked the structure. the steel expanded and weakened then collapsed. the force from the top of the towers collapsing forced the rest of the towers to collapse. And how dare you all say 9-11 is a hoax. you should all be killed. your disrespecting all of the people that lost their lives that day
@nbenton92 Those who lost loved ones are amongst those seeking answers. How dare you paint us as being disrespectful to the victims, we are seeking a thorough investigation into 9/11 not just a simulation of whether the official theory was even possible (NIST simulation). In doing this, we are trying to confirm who their killers were to keep them from doing so again. We should be killed for this you say?
Troll on. The evidence and facts reside with the truth movement.
@nbenton92 -- SO questioning official government-sponsored lies, fraud, crimes and cover-up that resulted in the violent deaths of 3000+ people, used as pretext to launch yet more unprovoked wars of aggression resulting in over a million killed, is DISRESPECTFUL to those who the gov. killed? YOU are naive & misinformed, utterly disrespectful of the citizen's duty to seek the truth and hold gov. officials accountable. Your gullibility is the reason America has become a corporate Police State.
@tomicabt I think Wikileaks was created most likely by the CIA.
Asange has stated he feels 9/11 conspiracies are stupid, yet he is dishing out classified info regarding the war that was started due to 9/11.
watch?v=P0sK4TjcUd4
Asange is a shill in my books. 9/11 comment = red flag.
Quite a few advantages to this. They use him to gain our trust but he will only leak info that coincides with the NWO agenda aka Iran and other rogue nations that havn't been infiltrated by the UN/CFR aka NWO.
This is not how you make a documentary. You must have people from both sides of the debate and put forward a complete argument. This is just a one sided joke. Very very poor.
@WillShakespeare2007 its not really a documentary, its blatantly persuasive. think of it like this, if the bush administration were on trial, this could serve as the prosecutors perspective.
@BeLiketheSquerrl - I don't think they can expect anyone to take it seriously when they are not presneting both sides of the argument. Also they fail to tell you that the "expert" Dario Fo (Nobel Prize winner) is in fact an actor that won the Nobel prize for literature. He owns and runs a theatre in Italy. How on on earth can they suggest he is an expert of engineering? I have just directed my first TV documentary and we hired experts from both sides.
@WillShakespeare2007 Presenting both sides of the argument? The official story of 9/11 is available on the government's website why would he repeat it?
He is simply showing you his findings, and instead of pointing out an example of why you feel he is incorrect you are only able to attack him in a manner unrelated to 9/11.
Many people have responded with 9/11 debunked videos etc. All of which have been debunked by the truth movement if you take the time to research each individual claim.
@BeLiketheSquerrl People who believe this INSANITY of the US government or the Mossad attacking the US on 911 are suferring from a similar delusional paranaoia suffured by Jared Lee Loughtner prior to his shooting spree.These thoughts are so bizzare as to suggest preliminary indications of schizophrenia and possible proclivity to violence.Peolple who post this craziness should be tracked.
@WillShakespeare2007 Many professionals have attempted to defend the official conspiracy theory. All have been proven incorrect/fraudulent. This includes the 9/11 Commission who's own members called it a coverup, NIST who were forced to admit that they cannot explain free fall speeds, Popular Mechanics who were also shown to make fraudulent statements, avoid certain arguments, and attack straw man arguments such as cellphones being used (avoiding mentioning the Olson fraud at that!).list goes on
@99Eternal I did not "attack" the guy I pointed out he is not qualified to comment on engineering. He is a theatre actor. Listen to yourself, so popular mechanics are in on the conspiracy as well are they? The only "expert" we can trust are Italian stage actors because the government has got to everyone else. Serious do you realize how mental that sounds? And as a professional documentary maker I can tell you that if you want to be taken seriously you need to present both sides of an argument.
@WillShakespeare2007 I wouldn't dare speculate to which degree Popular Mechanics are involved, but they have, undeniably, been shown to be mis-information in regards to their statements surrounding 9/11.
Again, i know what you mean, ideally the documentary would present any arguments. But to ignore the multitudes of factual information that debunkers have attempted to debunk and professional organizations have attempted to support but failed, would be ignorant. The arguments can be looked up.
@99Eternal Well glad you agree as my original comment was simply on this documentary and not 9/11 itself. It is a subject that I do not have huge amounts of time to research and for me the more important question is what threat does Islam represent to myself and my families freedoms.
I think 9/11 needs a documentary with a champion from the "truth" movement and a champion that accepts popular view. This allows the viewer to see ALL expert testimony and evidence and make up their own mind.
@WillShakespeare2007 I agree. I encourage you to research whenever you may have time. There is alot of mis-information out there though. Alot of elaborate "debunked" sites that are very convincing, however they have all been shown to be fraudulent as far as I have found. To me the smoking gun is the controlled demolition aspect, and the nanocomposite explosive residues, as well as live nanocomposite explosives as found in dust samples by the leaders of the demolition scene.
@99Eternal your not suggesting the twin towers were brought down via CD? That's not a controlled demo. There collapse was the opposite of controlled. lobsided, uneven and messy leading to the destruction of surrounding buildings.
@parttimelaver The term controlled demolition means that you have control over how the demolition occurs. You can create a messy demolition to make it look like an accident, in fact this is easier than a clean demolition. You can clearly see a perfectly symmetrical wave on all sides of the towers from certain angles, and you cannot explain that nor the presence of nano thermate, residue as well as undetonated, live nanothermate.
@jmpriestly The massive destruction of two buildings of roughly a million tons each crashing down beside it at 32ft per second squared should be enough toi destroy the building.
@caligula212 - People should checkout 9 11 missing links to find out what really happened. I got the whole documentary and some extra vids featured in the first playlist on my channel.
WTC7 is the biggest give away that this was a inside job. The American public will burn down government buildings when the finally tell the truth this year. Look it up. They will announce 9/11 as inside job this year.
@smasila , yeah, I have been thinking that as well. Kind of strange how all the people like Geraldo, and even a lot of policitans like Cynthia McKinney and Judge Nap are starting to come out and say it as well. I personally think they are purposely holding off the economic collapse to time it at the same time so when the whole shit house goes up in flames they will use the police state to clamp down on us and keep us in 'order'. Welcome to the NWO.
I DO TOO A guy in a CAVE AND 19 HIJACKERS I AGREE THAT IS A conspiracy GOVERNMENT PLANTS ON YOU TUBE ARE RIGHT THE GOVERNMENT NEVER LIES YEP I FEEL YOU!!!!!!!!!THERE IS NO WAY THAT WAS A MISSLE WENT INTO THE PENTAGON ISRAEL DIDN'T BENEFIT FROM 911 THE GUYS CAUGHT UNDER THE GEORGE WASHINTON BRIDGE WERE SET UP JUST GOOGLE "MOSSAD CIA 911 THANX GOOD LOOKIN OUT!!!!!!!!!!!
Why is this man so jolly? [Dario Fo]This is tragic.He is ecstatic .I believe the US is suffering from mass hysteria.And it goes on and on.We all saw the planes hit the towers. The planes were like torpedoes.Of course the towers collapsed.There is a logical explanation for the towers collapsing,and it was not the US government,it was the terrorists.The terrorists have the americans going against our own government, and they are laughing.We need to stand strong,together[americans].GOD BLESS U.S.
@jasmineblue22 Well said! This idiot is pointing out the Madrid building didnt collapse. THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO IMPACT!! Even a 6year old can understand this!!!!!
Why is everyone still saying that these buildings collapsed by fire. They were hit by aircraft traveling at over 500mph. They designed the buildings to take the hit from a 707 in "landing configuration"; which means the plane would be flying slow about 140 to 180 knots which is pretty standard for most commercial aircraft. If this was the actual case and not a terrorist attack, then yes, I believe those buildings could've taken a hit from a 767 going at most 200 knots. Not 450 knots.
@mdogpjm Have you compared the sizes of the planes? with actual fuel compared they appear reasonably close the speed of plane could be key? But who would land into the world trade center?
@choprast Nist hired a company to simulate the collapse of the twin tower by building a couple of wtc floors, set it on fire in furnaces (higher temerature for a longer time) and they increased the weight of what the upper floors would weight, and waited for hours upon hours with increasing temperature, the floors did not collapse and the floors did not sag.
They just came up with a theory because they can't be aus anymore come on come to the real world whose gnna be working on a case for 5-6years with the help of 100-1000 of workers
"It is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the WTC Buildings is false"
Paul Craig Roberts of the US Treasury under Ronald Reagon pwhen was this said?? and is it on camera somewhere eg where was the original soiurce spoken??
The twin towers is seriously debatable. But WTC 7, it was hit by huge large chunks of debris form the plane. But you can see the cracks run up the side. Scary cause it looks like a real proffesional job. The military uses wires that are actually TNT. Imagine that's what that security company put in instead of real cables!
@AIMANALI building 7 was the only 1 of the 3 that was a free fall---in a free fall every floor falls simultaneously. towers 1 and 2 did not free fall. they fell from the top down. and they didn't collapse in under ten seconds. they both took at least 15 (I think tower one took about 20).
@AntnyDsmn So where does that leave us. Actually even 20 seconds for that mass to fall is CRAZY. I remember many times looking up at WTCs and thinking damn this is a huge building. I am from NY
9/11 was the biggest comedy show- a little sad, but comical. I mean aside from getting millions of people to use fiat currency, 9/11 was another example of just how easily it is to herd millions of stupid people using govt propoganda
WW1, the Soviet Revolution, WW2, The Korean War against "Communism", The destruction and repopulation of East Timor, The "Vietnam" War in Cambodia, Laos and the rest of Indo China, The Gulf "War", the "Wars" against Afghanistan and Iraq, and soon to come, the "war" against Iran, Pakistan, Venezuala and the rest of the civilized world. It's been a hell of a century, literally.
You're government hasn't lied to you before? You're shocked about 9/11? Kennedy, Watergate, Tonkin, WMD's..get it
@Grasuuuuu what you think thousands of people wouldnt see a fucking bomb in there building and people were probably there like twenty for seven so how the hell could any one put one there
@az61999 Say all you want about how supposedly impossible it was to wire the building. Tell me why forty some witnesses wanting to testify about explosions were not even contacted. Tell me why the one witnesses recounting evidence about explosions had has his info taken down in private and deep-sixed in the final report.
This is stupidity. Most of the jet fuel was burning on the other side of the tower, not the impact zone. People don't jump from almost 1,300 feet in the air if they're all comfy cozy. They had no idea the buildings would collapse. They jumped to their deaths because it was unbearable to be up there.
WallStwizkid 4 months ago
Am I the only one annoyed at the audio being out of sync?? This is the 3rd version of this video I've tried on Youtube, all out of sync.
talaxian1 4 months ago
The Windsor Tower was not under construction, as they say here. Its construction was completed in 1979. Moreover, the structure of Windsor was made of concrete, much more resistant to fire than steel of the Twin Towers. I hope the rest of the information in this documentary of which I have no idea, will be more accurate.
ninichenielche 4 months ago
How is this Dario Fo, Nobel Prize winnder and all, qualified to speak about technical matters of the towers collapsin? He is an Italian satirist, playwright, theater director, actor and composer, nothing more, nothing less. He is not an engineer nor was he involved or knows any more details than those details which are available to the public. Still cannot imagine why his "voice" needs to be in this video supposedly dealing with the true investigation of 9/11.
USMCSRIG 5 months ago
9/11 was an absolute inside job,
kebabrullemums 5 months ago
People who say that this is true then they piss on every one of the victims died in those plane crash's
MrPainkiller1988 5 months ago
@MrPainkiller1988
Haven't we heard this arguement before.
The truth is if you believe in the OS and keep pushing that bs you are pissing on the people who died that day and all of the ones to die in future attacks. And guess what that may be me or you. Don't be so brain dead you douchebag, understand geopolitics, history, and do some actual research looking up his sources.
If you don't do that, you are a waste of oxygen so just stop spewing this OS bull.
webmaster4435 5 months ago
@webmaster4435 Actual reaserch?! Main subject around this "debate" is burning of an EMPTY office building. Notice the word "empty". Now, what did those two plains hit?
An empty office building in downtown New York?
In not one single point does this Italian ACTOR say that papper,books, wooden desks, chairs, wall interior bur at certain temperature.
Again their claims are wrong and a person who uses his/hers brain corectly will notice what their true aim and goal is, these people are trash.
MrPainkiller1988 4 months ago
@MrPainkiller1988 I'm sorry, you're claiming office furniture and paper made this fire worse, LOL. You are trying SO hard dude.
thamnosma 4 months ago
@thamnosma And you think it didn't?!
Set a papper on fire, see what happens, and then try to convince me that what these people are doing is the "real" science. I'm not trying hard at all it was quite easy with me limited knowlege to debunk these theories in 10 seconds into watching this "investigation".
MrPainkiller1988 4 months ago
@webmaster4435 And you belive in a documentary that had 0 facts straight, tell me that I should stop being braindead?! Sorry to burst your bubble but this is fake, Easter bunny is fake and sorry Santa isn't real too, fairy tales that exist in reality arent true. But I'm sadend that you feel that I'm waste of oxygen. Open your eyes not everything you see on TV has to be 100% correct.
In this case not even 0.1%.
MrPainkiller1988 4 months ago
God Rest Their Souls"()" (very sad)
AlyssaAddicts 5 months ago
Great documentary. However, the video is out of sync!
musiclover3928 5 months ago
read their lips, they say something else than the voice in the video it's a fake video
dpodbereschi 5 months ago
@dpodbereschi Hey idiot....it's slightly out of sync. You can even see that on many HD TV shows. Get a grip.
thamnosma 4 months ago
What a lie, people on the screen say something else, it is a different voice that narrates parts of the story
dpodbereschi 5 months ago
I understand that the jet fuel might not burn hot enough, but to put it simply, THE BUILDING WAS HIT BY A FUCKING PASSENGER AIRLINER!!!
TheSchoolOfFool 6 months ago
why is the scientist always smiling
CadmanFooty 6 months ago 2
The ONLY things debunked here is what you were told.it's so weak and the government hid all this info in their poor report they distributed months later.
All the key acts that PROVE this was an inside job were not written about or covered.
ALL you foold who continue to belive Osama Bin Laden did this, need to stop being spoon fed liesand see the truth.
paymydues 6 months ago
I think the reason some still belive what they were 'told' happened is because MOST cannot comprehend that a country could DO this to it's own citizens.
The sad truth is THEY DID.!!!!!!!!!!!
I am not easily fooled and the facts and evidence shown demonstrates the odds of these collapses and attacks happening the way you were told is a about 1000-1.
Karma will bring this out in the end.
Those responsible won't get away with their cowardly actions either.
Peace.............................
paymydues 6 months ago
Settle it all. Build the WTC again and crash a drone in to it.
creativenameisnotava 6 months ago
@creativenameisnotava Exactly :)
architecturalabdabs 6 months ago
whats the song at 9th minute
PewPewPlasmagun 7 months ago
Wisdor tower did not fall because it did not sustain a large impact of a plane, Im sure the WTC if caught on fire would do the same thing. But due to the impacts on 9/11 it severely crippled both towers setting there own fate.
pocomedy 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pocomedy "Wisdor tower did not fall because it did not sustain a large impact of a plane, Im sure the WTC if caught on fire would do the same thing. But due to the impacts on 9/11 it severely crippled both towers setting there own fate."
Absolutely right, and crap like that is the reason nobody takes the truth movement seriously.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
Why is the sound always out of synch on the best evidence? Vote up if you notice this too.
XenoBloke 7 months ago
People who don't believe 9/11 was an inside job please tell me why? There is so much evidence that it was, the list of evidence is so overwhelming that one would have to write a 5000 page paper just to cover all of it! Why do you feel an urge to protect the Elites?
Kmost213 8 months ago 17
@Kmost213 There's no evidence whatsoever, you lying douchebag.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kmost213 "People who don't believe 9/11 was an inside job please tell me why? There is so much evidence that it was, the list of evidence is so overwhelming that one would have to write a 5000 page paper just to cover all of it! Why do you feel an urge to protect the Elites?"
Because there's no real evidence.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@Kmost213 because all of the theories have been debunked lol...
pinkycheeks 6 months ago
@Kmost213 What evidence are you pointing on?! An empty disgarded building that wasn't even built, or an office building that had all kinds of stuff .....
These all are actors and a movie that is fictatious in every way and you are apperantly beliveing it, I guess you belive that Sanata claws and Easter Bunny is also real huh?
MrPainkiller1988 5 months ago
@Kmost213 answer this why would the U.S. government kill it's own people?
luckmanprod 4 months ago
@Kmost213 Tell me, why would people from different places of the world meet at an airport , steal an plane and commit suicide ? How could America arrange this ? IF America would ask somebody to do it, they asked one would go to the media. IT would be a way harder hit fo the americans if they would know 100 percent that america wanted to kill thousands of people. america would just collaps.
oxawn 1 month ago
Italian stupid fart!
6530517 8 months ago
Was the Windsor Tower hit by a plane? No? Then how can it be compared to the WTC? More than half of the support columns in each of the WTC buildings were severed by the impacts of the planes. How many support columns were severed in the Windsor Tower?
BTW, the Windsor Tower was built in 1979 so whatever was "under construction" was not related to the structure of the building...
Re: Paul Craig Roberts...Who cares what an economist thinks about the collapse of the WTC? This video is a joke.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
just shows how fucking dumb people are, part 2 and each of the following parts views decrease dramatically
Elektr0House 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Elektr0House "part 2 and each of the following parts views decrease dramatically"
That's true for every video on youtube that's divided into multiple parts...
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
but WHY kill your own people and destroy your own city landmarks?
MDkid1 8 months ago
@MDkid1 wikipedia "operation northwoods" this is nothing new. Look at how the world has changed since 911.....look at the patriot act....look at the defense budget, gone from 290 billion in 2000 to 700 billion today....during the whole of the 1990s the budget was stuck at around 290 to 300 billion and now its more than double. Money and oil my friend money and oil. Remember "the love of money is the root of all evil" This has been going on really for a long time.
edwardstim 8 months ago
@edwardstim They didn't need to take down the WTC and kill 3,000 people to get the Patriot Act passed or increase the defense budget. One plane crashing into an empty field probably would've had the same effect. The pentagon crash by itself certainly would have. The deadliest act of terrorism on American soil, up until 9/11, was the OK City bombing, which killed 168 people. The Pentagon crash alone killed 189. Taking out the WTC was totally unnecessary.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 There is too make for me to say on here. The patriot act has nothing to do with stopping terrorism, neither does the airport security. I'll give you an example, Heathrow Airport. The head of security admitted on a BBC documentary that he security staff couldn't tell what a bomb looked like, and had no real chance of stopping such devices from getting through. On that same documentary a scientist show how easy it was to make a bomb from readily available chemicals that fits inside
edwardstim 8 months ago
@edwardstim What does any of that have to do with anything I wrote?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 what about to invade the middle east. Have you read PNAC document have you read mearshimer and Walt paper on the Israel lobby? Have you seen the fox news reports on post 911 israeli spy arrests never again mentioned?
MrAlecaf 7 months ago
@MrAlecaf What are you responding to?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 "They didn't need to take down the WTC and kill 3,000 people" Yes they did, the attack had to be traumatic in the American psyche. For the last 10 years whenever any law regarding security is pushed they only have to mention 9/11 and it will be passed. Also, a plane crash into an empty field or the crash on the Pentagon alone wouldn't vindicate the invasions of Afghanistan or Iraq.
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 The Pentagon crash alone would've been the worst terrorist attack on US soil in history. Remember the Oklahoma City bombing? That was the previous record holder and it was pretty traumatic.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Anyway, the reasons they did this is the last question that can be answered, what we can state though is that official story CANNOT be true...
manniman82 7 months ago 2
@manniman82 The "official" story is more likely true than the "truth"er story. Controlled demolition and missile into the Pentagon ideas are laughably idiotic. What CANNOT be true about the "official" story?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 There is no truther story. We only know that the planes COULD NOT have brought down the towers, that it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon, that Norad's response was not according to protocol. Any theory i.e: controlled demolition or missile into Pentagon, it is just that, a theory at best but I would call it speculation. What is not speculation is that the Towers could not have collapsed due to the planes alone, it is and engineering fact...
manniman82 7 months ago 2
@manniman82 "We only know that the planes COULD NOT have brought down the towers"
truthers are just like religious people. Their brains are simply not capable of understanding the immensity of the forces involved with the WTC plane crashes and collapses. Just as religious people don't believe in evolution because their brains are incapable of understanding the huge span of time that life has been on Earth.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@manniman82 "it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon"
Here's another way that truthers are like religious people. When truthers look at evidence, they absorb the evidence that coincides with their preconceived notions, and disregard the evidence that contradicts them. Just as religious people read the bible and absorb what they like and ignore the contradictions.
In this case, you're ignoring the 100+ people who were stuck in traffic and SAW a plane hit the Pentagon.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Again, I base my opinions on facts and science not on beliefs or mass propaganda.
As for the eye witnesses, well I can't explain those accounts if in fact they are true but it shouldn't impede a proper independent investigation into the event.
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "As for the eye witnesses, well I can't explain those accounts if in fact they are true"
You didn't even know there were 100+ eyewitnesses at the Pentagon, did you? XD
"I base my opinions on facts and science not on beliefs or mass propaganda."
Loose Change and Zero are stereotypical propaganda. They aim to manipulate their audience by creating an emotional response and only provide select evidence, all to further a specific political agenda.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Actually the fact that people that question the official story are called unpatriotic and other names suggests that it is you that is manipulated by an emotional response.
Also, if a new investigation, a proper independent investigation, answers the important questions, is scientifically sound and ALL available documents (includes black boxes, recording tapes, eye witnesses, ect) are taken into account then I would approve with the conclusions.
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "Actually the fact that people that question the official story are called unpatriotic and other names suggests that it is you that is manipulated by an emotional response."
The vast majority of people don't call people who question the "official" story unpatriotic. That just further shows what a seriously warped perception of reality you have. They call you a nutjob, stupid, a loser, a waste of oxygen, but not unpatriotic.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 "create an emotional response",
"They call you a nutjob, stupid, a loser, a waste of oxygen, but not unpatriotic."
I rest my case...
manniman82 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@manniman82 "create an emotional response",
"They call you a nutjob, stupid, a loser, a waste of oxygen, but not unpatriotic."
I rest my case..."
I said people call you those things, not the so-called "propaganda" videos.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 I knew that there were eye witnesses to the Pentagon crash. Why do you assume I didn't know: just because I knew of those witnesses doesn't impede me from not believing, in general, the official story. It doesn't contradict that, overall, I don't believe the official story. I can ask you the same about people that heard explosions in WTC but I'm sure you, on the other hand, would invent some pseudo explanation for that...
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "Why do you assume I didn't know: just because I knew of those witnesses doesn't impede me from not believing, in general, the official story."
Forget the official story. You said you don't believe a plane hit the pentagon. You're blatantly disregarding 100+ eyewitnesses, yet you're more apt to trust the people inside the WTC who said they heard explosions. This is why people laugh at you. Do you understand why? Do I have to explain it to you?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@manniman82 "I can ask you the same about people that heard explosions in WTC but I'm sure you, on the other hand, would invent some pseudo explanation for that... "
Did it ever occur to you that these explosions were just loud noises? Imagine, if you can, that a plane just hit the building you were in and you felt the building move so much that you thought it was going to topple over. When you're fleeing for your life, ANY loud noise is going to sound like an explosion to you.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 "Bullshit, if that were true you would've said that already and you would've explained WHY the towers couldn't have collapsed from the planes."
You want me to come on an internet site and flash my "badge" even before we start a discussion? You're ridiculous. You want to explain all the reasons why it is IMPOSSIBLE that the crashes caused the collapse?
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "You want me to come on an internet site and flash my "badge" even before we start a discussion?"
No, I just want you to back up the claims of fact you make.
"You want to explain all the reasons why it is IMPOSSIBLE that the crashes caused the collapse?"
Of course! Do you expect people to just take your word for it? Are you insane?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Anyway I'm done with you. You're prooving, without a shadow of a doubt, that America actually deserves to be lied to. We're too stupid, too gullible. Dogma and propaganda is too powerfull for the average American such as yourself. If you don't help progress at least don't block it... It's the least you can do!
manniman82 7 months ago 2
@manniman82 And you're proving that truthers have no integrity whatsoever. You proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that truthers disregard evidence that contradicts their opinion. You trust people who say they heard explosions in the WTC, but ignore the 100+ people who SAW A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON. You're a complete joke.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 The only reason I bother with you is because the quicker people finally realize that the official 9/11 report IS NOT AN OPEN, INDEPENDENT, UNBIASED INVESTIGATION the quicker we can get this over with. Also the more time passes, the least likely it is that any new investigation will occur. Why are you opposed to any such investigation? Did you read the official report? Don't tell me that you call that a complete investigation for an event such as 9/11...
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "Why are you opposed to any such investigation?"
It's unnecessary. We know the government knew terrorists were potentially planning to hijack planes and slam them into buildings. That's why NORAD had drills for it. But Bush didn't MAKE it happen. If he did, there wouldn't have been drills for it, and he would've acted more heroically on 9/11. He would've shot down at least one of the planes to make the Bush Admin look like heroes. Instead, they looked like incompetent buffoons.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@manniman82 "the Towers could not have collapsed due to the planes alone, it is and engineering fact..."
Where'd you get your engineering degree?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 I finished my second year of Civil engeneering at Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Where did you get your degree from?
manniman82 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@manniman82 "I finished my second year of Civil engeneering at Concordia University, Montreal, Canada."
LOL. Bullshit, if that were true you would've said that already and you would've explained WHY the towers couldn't have collapsed from the planes. Also, if that were true you would know that the planes certainly could have brought the towers down. You're just a trolling liar, like almost every truther is.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Now if the collapse of the towers cannot be scientifically explained by the planes alone it logically means that something else occurred that we are not aware of. Like I said, there is no official truther story on what happened, only the real people who did this know what really happened. What we demand is a thorough independent investigation but the government doesn't want one and, obviously, the American public like you are so gullible.
manniman82 7 months ago 4
@KayBeeEee1983 I've heard of dumb Americans before when I was abroad but didn't really believe it but I now fully understand what they are referring to. It's not so much dumb, unintelligent but more like "indoctrinated" into believing what the tube says. We were shoved the same lie thousands of times so much so that it becomes our reality. Get out of your comfort zone and ask the questions. Don't tell me that you genuinely believe that fairy tale? You're indoctrinated but not brain dead I hope!
manniman82 7 months ago 13
@manniman82 "We were shoved the same lie thousands of times so much so that it becomes our reality."
Those lies have been coming from the truth movement. You've heard them say that a plane didn't hit the pentagon so many times that you believe it even in the face of 100+ eyewitnesses who claim they saw a plane. Watch a few documentaries that weren't put out by the truth movement. Ones with actual experts in the fields they talk about. Why is this video interviewing a playwright about physics?
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 Just like there are experts that agree with the official story there as many that don't believe that it happened like that. For the last time, A PROPER INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CAN AND WILL KILL ALL DOUBT on what happened on 9/11. The official report IS NOT A COMPLETE AND INDEPENDENT investigation.
manniman82 7 months ago
@manniman82 "For the last time, A PROPER INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION CAN AND WILL KILL ALL DOUBT on what happened on 9/11. "
Ha! Bullshit. If that investigation didn't come out with the answers you wanted you would whine and bitch about how it was improper in some way.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@manniman82 You need to go read my comments on part 1 because I'm not repeating it. The only fairy tale that is believed is the same one you believe....that a team of ninjas rigged 1,300 foot towers, obviously covertly. Impossible. Explosives not going off after jetliners crash into the rigged building? Impossible. According to you, we believe what we hear on TV (which is inaccurate in and of itself) as opposed to you, who believes what you hear on youtube videos, and conspiracy sites. Right.
WallStwizkid 4 months ago
@WallStwizkid Missing security tapes of WTC: coto2 . wordpress . com/2011/08/01/the-missing-security-tapes-for-the-world-trade-center/
Most of the 9/11 commission is based on revelations done under torture: globalresearch . ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13307
Dozens of first responders that heard bombs in the seconds prior to the collapse, research buddy.
One of millions building 7 skeptics: youtube . com/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I&feature=player_embedded
manniman82 4 months ago
@manniman82 Prove your statements with facts beyond a reasonable doubt thanks.
hamberg42 4 months ago
@hamberg42 Prove what beyond a reasonable doubt? that the official explanation can't be true? Sure: ae911truth . org/
You'll have to research that site and follow the links and if you would have read my previous links you would have researched more on the claims they make (which are proven) and you wouldn't be asking me this. I won't spoon feed prepackaged info with a bias like CNN does, if you want the truth find out by yourself or remain ignorant. The choice is yours...
manniman82 4 months ago
@manniman82 "The only fairy tale that is believed is the same one you believe....that a team of ninjas rigged 1,300 foot towers, obviously covertly. Impossible."
Prove it. The only thing that is impossible a symmetrical global collapse of 3 buildings caused by 2 airplanes.
hamberg42 4 months ago
@hamberg42 I think you meant to reply to WallStwizkid...
BTW there was plenty of opportunities to rig the buildings, I'm aware of these: there was an unprecedented major power outage 2 weeks before 9/11. Missing security tapes of the days before 9/11 have shown 3 vans coming at the same time of night in the underground parking lot (for 11 days) and departing before dawn. Their purpose is unknown (no repairs scheduled, ect). There was elevator maintenance a year before...plenty of opportunities.
manniman82 4 months ago
@WallStwizkid BTW when the airliners crashed and exploded, the fuel caught on fire as well? But wait the official fairy tale says that both towers collapsed due to fires caused by the fuel...Only three buildings have ever collapsed due to office fires: you guessed it WTC1-2 and 7. BTW, Building 7 wasn't hit by plane...
This is what you believe: youtube . com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
and this is why you believe the official fairy tale: youtube . com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4
manniman82 4 months ago
@WallStwizkid And just to let you know, youtube video are a great way to get informed. Like any other media, it is up to the user to verify sources, which I always do.
youtube . com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs
^^At least watch it and verify the information, this is my only goal...
manniman82 4 months ago
@manniman82 Indoctrination - Churchill said the easiest way to rule a nation is through its music - the typical rythm of music in America is 96 beats per sec - which has been defined by NLP as "believe everything 'I' say"
sankhyasutra 1 week ago
Too many bullshits in the mouth of the novelist!
13rdp 8 months ago
@joshuakloo is this true? how do you know?
hobbsbd822 8 months ago
it is creasy to think that still today on YOUTUBE,some people still comment on the fact that fire did bring those tours down and swearing to gods ,insulting others who believe this guy for example from labotories who ran tests that did not work,,,!!!????...WTF...!!!!who are those blind assholes...!!!!paid to harras truth movements maybe.facts are there,before our eyes.the world was fooled....!!!!
MrPhattdirty 9 months ago
we should indict dick cheney
BlueReishiMan 9 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
the truth is growing stronger. building 7 is the key. adverts on television promoting an independent enquiry from next month onwards to air around new york.
rememberbuilding7 (dot) org/video-gallery/
reubz1 9 months ago
we will never find out what happend on 9/11 as long as there is such thing as a goverment there will not be the truth.
Drummer1Bodhran1 9 months ago
a government can be overthrown. the truth is growing stronger. building 7 is the key. adverts on television promoting an independent enquiry from next month onwards to air around new york.
rememberbuilding7 (dot) org/video-gallery/
reubz1 9 months ago
@reubz1 Overthrow a democratic republic? smart... And you consider yourself a patriot, i assume?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@iChallengeUtoThink Simple motive: insurance fraud. More complex motive: covering up who really committed the attack as well as covering up other crimes of the elite and the Federal gov't.
mackbk718 9 months ago
Building 7 was the home of the CIA and financial records that they needed to get rid of.
KQH8 10 months ago
Yes the building burned for 20 consecutive hours.But was it hit by a FUCKING PLANE. NO
MrLebowski1980 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Re 911 Conspiracy nuts as Bill Maher says "The problem is that the people with the most ridiculous ideas are always the people who are most certain of them."
caligula212 10 months ago
Inside job. And they got away with it.
HumanRaceOfYourKnees 11 months ago
King Bush and his Neocons
Born2Flesh 11 months ago
why do the offical guys always go on about the outer facade being load bearing ? thats just fucked up ,therev are other vids that show the outer facade warping and they go "see there is the steel buckling and bending ...so is this where they got it from the NIST vid ....yeah and whats the score with the U.L. logo with the arrow flying into the cirlce ,thats a bit distasteful if they where involved with explaining this,fuckers
reksub10 11 months ago
The same people who owned the WTC now own the Sears Tower in Chicago. Rahm Emnaual is one of the groups running dogs.
wwefanworld 11 months ago
The rockefellers are to be hung, all of them
kebabrullemums 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building 7 fell because it's deisel was lit!
ZIONISTMAN1 1 year ago
So 2 towers came down so SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTH / and both EXACTLY the same??? and then building 7 came down also so SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTH?? just from fire HHmmmmm , sounds fishy, its AMAZING how NORAD gets controlled by DICK CHEANY in 2001 ,and cant protect the skies on 911, BUT, BUT for the past 50 years B4 911 they would be in the skies in 2 minutes if a plane goes off course <<<<<< strange ??
PARAPOUNARI 1 year ago
What about the weight of the top floors falling on the tower.
ZIONISTMAN1 1 year ago
@ZIONISTMAN1 The intact structures below the crash were designed to resist 3-5x their own mass. The only way such a symmetric collapse (implosion, really) could occur is by some simultaneous severing of the buildings' core structures. Here are peer-reviewed, forensic-evidence based articles now published in reputable scientific journals: journalof911studiesDOTcom/ ..... peace.
KillerCracker69 11 months ago
@ZIONISTMAN1 watch at 4:40
electricalel 10 months ago
The Rockefellers built the Trade Center and we all know that the Illuminati has been planning a New World Order for over 200 years and 9/11 was planned long before it happened.Is it possible that thermite could have been placed near the steel columns when the building was actually constructed and designed in such a way the the fuses could be easily installed at any point in future time?For instance,a maze of capped off electrical pipe that leads to the thermite charges throughout the structures
lute760 1 year ago
to parttimelaver from peeper, And remember I think a man convinced against his will is still of the same opinion and that is his,or hers right.
peeper63 1 year ago
I think that that is what most people want, I.m not nere to debate,fallout curse or any of that guff but I believethat a new and complete,and NON-PARTISAN investigation is definately and sorely needed if for nothing but to shut up the conspriracy buffs or to show to some people you should not take someone at their word just based on blind faith or thinking that it is not even remotely possible that you may have been lied to.This is owed to all americans, Let the chips fall where they may. Peace.
peeper63 1 year ago
hsa been totally not willing to investigate and report other key facts tell me that it is either through some type of omission or comission that would make anyone feel we were not told everything. I I were the goverment and maintained the fact that pentagon was hit by an airplane controled by terrorist I would be willing to show more than just 5 frames of video that only raises more questions. I don't place blame on anyone or anybody, But people just want ALL the facts not just some or stories.
peeper63 1 year ago
Let me correct you on something my friend, it's not that I am insecure nor do I feel the need to be in control of anything other than my life, but I will say to you that why is anyone who ask questions or even looks at the possibilty tha there may be more than one account to this story. Most npeople have eyes but they refuse to see, only believing what suits them. If you look at the pictures and the way that things were distorted in the official report,lack of funding, no main stream media that
peeper63 1 year ago
How convenient that after the 11th of september that was never mentioned publicly again, Wake up people this wreaks of cover-up. No matter how much evidence comes out, some people are going to believe 911 was an inside job and some won't, A man convinced against his will is still of the same opinion after all that is their right as an American,OH i'm sorry,I forgot, we are losing those to as a result of these attacks. Unless we want to lose all of our rights, we need to wake up to the bullshit.
peeper63 1 year ago
WE are in trouble if it is even remotejy possible that 19 nobodies could slip thought a trillion dollar military and intelligence infrastructure to pull of the most devastating attack on U.S soil in the history nation of the,what a waste of tax dollars. If people cannot see that 911 was in some way assisted, they are in denial, Free fall speeds, severe lack of plane wreckage at the Pentagon and Shanksville, and not to mention rumsfelds press conference on the 10th of 2 trillion dollars missing
peeper63 1 year ago
@peeper63 'WE are in trouble if it is even remotejy possible that 19 nobodies could slip thought a trillion dollar military and intelligence infrastructure to pull of the most devastating attack on U.S soil in the history nation ' HAHA - and therein lyes the exact reason why we have so many conspiracists - because we can't bear the idea that '19 nobodies' managed to kill 3000 people so easily. You've inadvertedly exposed the reason why you are a conspiracist - fear of not being in control.
parttimelaver 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JEWS!
I like Incogman.net
Xianman06 1 year ago
even though the towers were not engulfed in flames, they both had 28 thousand gallons of jet fuel burning inside of them. on top of that, the force of the impact cracked the structure. the steel expanded and weakened then collapsed. the force from the top of the towers collapsing forced the rest of the towers to collapse. And how dare you all say 9-11 is a hoax. you should all be killed. your disrespecting all of the people that lost their lives that day
nbenton92 1 year ago
@nbenton92 Those who lost loved ones are amongst those seeking answers. How dare you paint us as being disrespectful to the victims, we are seeking a thorough investigation into 9/11 not just a simulation of whether the official theory was even possible (NIST simulation). In doing this, we are trying to confirm who their killers were to keep them from doing so again. We should be killed for this you say?
Troll on. The evidence and facts reside with the truth movement.
99Eternal 1 year ago
@nbenton92 -- SO questioning official government-sponsored lies, fraud, crimes and cover-up that resulted in the violent deaths of 3000+ people, used as pretext to launch yet more unprovoked wars of aggression resulting in over a million killed, is DISRESPECTFUL to those who the gov. killed? YOU are naive & misinformed, utterly disrespectful of the citizen's duty to seek the truth and hold gov. officials accountable. Your gullibility is the reason America has become a corporate Police State.
starmanskye 1 year ago
Maybe Wikileaks would leak something on this matter...
tomicabt 1 year ago
@tomicabt I think Wikileaks was created most likely by the CIA.
Asange has stated he feels 9/11 conspiracies are stupid, yet he is dishing out classified info regarding the war that was started due to 9/11.
watch?v=P0sK4TjcUd4
Asange is a shill in my books. 9/11 comment = red flag.
Quite a few advantages to this. They use him to gain our trust but he will only leak info that coincides with the NWO agenda aka Iran and other rogue nations that havn't been infiltrated by the UN/CFR aka NWO.
99Eternal 1 year ago
9:58 LOOK AT WTC 6 on the left with the GAPING HOLE in the middle-BLOWN OUT FROM THE BASEMENT after one Tower supposedly fell in on it.
ALL BULLSHIT LIES. WTC 6 was DEMOLISHED ALSO.
look at a photo of wtc 6 from above AFTER the demolition of the buildings.
HOW MANY WTC BUILDINGS WERE DESTROYED ON 911? SEVEN COMPLETE BUILDINGS- 911 was an inside job.COMPLETELY!
WTC 6 LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE OKLAHOMA CITY DEMOLITION FOLKS.
cadu1995 1 year ago
9:58 LOOK AT WTC 6 on the left with the GAPING HOLE in the middle-BLOWN OUT FROM THE BASEMENT after one Tower supposedly fell in on it.
ALL BULLSHIT LIES. WTC 6 was DEMOLISHED ALSO.
look at a photo of wtc 6 from above AFTER the demolition of the buildings.
HOW MANY WTC BUILDINGS WERE DESTROYED ON 911? SEVEN COMPLETE BUILDINGS- 911 was an inside job.COMPLETELY!
cadu1995 1 year ago
This is not how you make a documentary. You must have people from both sides of the debate and put forward a complete argument. This is just a one sided joke. Very very poor.
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
@WillShakespeare2007 its not really a documentary, its blatantly persuasive. think of it like this, if the bush administration were on trial, this could serve as the prosecutors perspective.
BeLiketheSquerrl 1 year ago
@BeLiketheSquerrl - I don't think they can expect anyone to take it seriously when they are not presneting both sides of the argument. Also they fail to tell you that the "expert" Dario Fo (Nobel Prize winner) is in fact an actor that won the Nobel prize for literature. He owns and runs a theatre in Italy. How on on earth can they suggest he is an expert of engineering? I have just directed my first TV documentary and we hired experts from both sides.
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
@WillShakespeare2007 Presenting both sides of the argument? The official story of 9/11 is available on the government's website why would he repeat it?
He is simply showing you his findings, and instead of pointing out an example of why you feel he is incorrect you are only able to attack him in a manner unrelated to 9/11.
Many people have responded with 9/11 debunked videos etc. All of which have been debunked by the truth movement if you take the time to research each individual claim.
99Eternal 1 year ago
@BeLiketheSquerrl People who believe this INSANITY of the US government or the Mossad attacking the US on 911 are suferring from a similar delusional paranaoia suffured by Jared Lee Loughtner prior to his shooting spree.These thoughts are so bizzare as to suggest preliminary indications of schizophrenia and possible proclivity to violence.Peolple who post this craziness should be tracked.
caligula212 1 year ago
@caligula212 You didn't address one fact in this video or any claim made by truthers.
anewlow23 10 months ago
@WillShakespeare2007 Many professionals have attempted to defend the official conspiracy theory. All have been proven incorrect/fraudulent. This includes the 9/11 Commission who's own members called it a coverup, NIST who were forced to admit that they cannot explain free fall speeds, Popular Mechanics who were also shown to make fraudulent statements, avoid certain arguments, and attack straw man arguments such as cellphones being used (avoiding mentioning the Olson fraud at that!).list goes on
99Eternal 1 year ago
@99Eternal I did not "attack" the guy I pointed out he is not qualified to comment on engineering. He is a theatre actor. Listen to yourself, so popular mechanics are in on the conspiracy as well are they? The only "expert" we can trust are Italian stage actors because the government has got to everyone else. Serious do you realize how mental that sounds? And as a professional documentary maker I can tell you that if you want to be taken seriously you need to present both sides of an argument.
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
@WillShakespeare2007 I wouldn't dare speculate to which degree Popular Mechanics are involved, but they have, undeniably, been shown to be mis-information in regards to their statements surrounding 9/11.
Again, i know what you mean, ideally the documentary would present any arguments. But to ignore the multitudes of factual information that debunkers have attempted to debunk and professional organizations have attempted to support but failed, would be ignorant. The arguments can be looked up.
99Eternal 1 year ago
@99Eternal Well glad you agree as my original comment was simply on this documentary and not 9/11 itself. It is a subject that I do not have huge amounts of time to research and for me the more important question is what threat does Islam represent to myself and my families freedoms.
I think 9/11 needs a documentary with a champion from the "truth" movement and a champion that accepts popular view. This allows the viewer to see ALL expert testimony and evidence and make up their own mind.
WillShakespeare2007 1 year ago
@WillShakespeare2007 I agree. I encourage you to research whenever you may have time. There is alot of mis-information out there though. Alot of elaborate "debunked" sites that are very convincing, however they have all been shown to be fraudulent as far as I have found. To me the smoking gun is the controlled demolition aspect, and the nanocomposite explosive residues, as well as live nanocomposite explosives as found in dust samples by the leaders of the demolition scene.
99Eternal 1 year ago
@99Eternal your not suggesting the twin towers were brought down via CD? That's not a controlled demo. There collapse was the opposite of controlled. lobsided, uneven and messy leading to the destruction of surrounding buildings.
parttimelaver 1 year ago
@parttimelaver The term controlled demolition means that you have control over how the demolition occurs. You can create a messy demolition to make it look like an accident, in fact this is easier than a clean demolition. You can clearly see a perfectly symmetrical wave on all sides of the towers from certain angles, and you cannot explain that nor the presence of nano thermate, residue as well as undetonated, live nanothermate.
99Eternal 1 year ago
@jmpriestly The massive destruction of two buildings of roughly a million tons each crashing down beside it at 32ft per second squared should be enough toi destroy the building.
caligula212 1 year ago
@caligula212 - People should checkout 9 11 missing links to find out what really happened. I got the whole documentary and some extra vids featured in the first playlist on my channel.
abe2517 1 year ago
Zero documentary crushes the OS. NIST did the investigation and was concealing evidence of secondary explosions.
thedawn090 1 year ago
WTC7 is the biggest give away that this was a inside job. The American public will burn down government buildings when the finally tell the truth this year. Look it up. They will announce 9/11 as inside job this year.
smasila 1 year ago
@smasila , yeah, I have been thinking that as well. Kind of strange how all the people like Geraldo, and even a lot of policitans like Cynthia McKinney and Judge Nap are starting to come out and say it as well. I personally think they are purposely holding off the economic collapse to time it at the same time so when the whole shit house goes up in flames they will use the police state to clamp down on us and keep us in 'order'. Welcome to the NWO.
facebookprogrammer 1 year ago
I DO TOO A guy in a CAVE AND 19 HIJACKERS I AGREE THAT IS A conspiracy GOVERNMENT PLANTS ON YOU TUBE ARE RIGHT THE GOVERNMENT NEVER LIES YEP I FEEL YOU!!!!!!!!!THERE IS NO WAY THAT WAS A MISSLE WENT INTO THE PENTAGON ISRAEL DIDN'T BENEFIT FROM 911 THE GUYS CAUGHT UNDER THE GEORGE WASHINTON BRIDGE WERE SET UP JUST GOOGLE "MOSSAD CIA 911 THANX GOOD LOOKIN OUT!!!!!!!!!!!
jimidee69 1 year ago
Much better than loose change.. makes no assumptions just lays down facts.
petepamf 1 year ago
Prove the truthers wrong: Build a WTC and fly a passenger airliner in it...
manoman0 1 year ago
@manoman0 a plane hopefullty with THEM in it! jejejejejej!
caligula212 1 year ago
@caligula212 lol
manoman0 1 year ago
Why is this man so jolly? [Dario Fo]This is tragic.He is ecstatic .I believe the US is suffering from mass hysteria.And it goes on and on.We all saw the planes hit the towers. The planes were like torpedoes.Of course the towers collapsed.There is a logical explanation for the towers collapsing,and it was not the US government,it was the terrorists.The terrorists have the americans going against our own government, and they are laughing.We need to stand strong,together[americans].GOD BLESS U.S.
jasmineblue22 1 year ago
@jasmineblue22 Well said! This idiot is pointing out the Madrid building didnt collapse. THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO IMPACT!! Even a 6year old can understand this!!!!!
caligula212 1 year ago
@caligula212 What part of the fact that the WTC were built to withstand 2 airliners hitting them did you not understand?
Emsworker68 1 year ago
jimidee69...Yeah man.I definitely hear ya...
bennekeb666 1 year ago
Why is everyone still saying that these buildings collapsed by fire. They were hit by aircraft traveling at over 500mph. They designed the buildings to take the hit from a 707 in "landing configuration"; which means the plane would be flying slow about 140 to 180 knots which is pretty standard for most commercial aircraft. If this was the actual case and not a terrorist attack, then yes, I believe those buildings could've taken a hit from a 767 going at most 200 knots. Not 450 knots.
mdogpjm 1 year ago
@mdogpjm what about the plane that hit building 7, oh right, there wasn't one...
mackbk718 1 year ago 16
@mdogpjm Have you compared the sizes of the planes? with actual fuel compared they appear reasonably close the speed of plane could be key? But who would land into the world trade center?
StoopidTwoofer 1 year ago
Rebuild part of the towers and test a plane crash!
ubertuberx5 1 year ago
What a piece of stinking Cr@p. The fatso is not a scientist he won Nobel prize in literature. We should test these theories at macca and madina.
choprast 1 year ago
@choprast Nist hired a company to simulate the collapse of the twin tower by building a couple of wtc floors, set it on fire in furnaces (higher temerature for a longer time) and they increased the weight of what the upper floors would weight, and waited for hours upon hours with increasing temperature, the floors did not collapse and the floors did not sag.
Xendrius 1 year ago
They just came up with a theory because they can't be aus anymore come on come to the real world whose gnna be working on a case for 5-6years with the help of 100-1000 of workers
cheatmaster786 1 year ago
Buildings 1 and 2 should have fallen like a tree in the forest. If the Authorised version is correct.
Jackthesmilingblack 1 year ago
"It is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the WTC Buildings is false"
Paul Craig Roberts of the US Treasury under Ronald Reagon when was this said?? and is it on camera somewhere eg where was the original source spoken??
a41dog 1 year ago
"It is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the WTC Buildings is false"
Paul Craig Roberts of the US Treasury under Ronald Reagon pwhen was this said?? and is it on camera somewhere eg where was the original soiurce spoken??
a41dog 1 year ago
This is more informative and detailed than loose change!
elfil76 1 year ago
The twin towers is seriously debatable. But WTC 7, it was hit by huge large chunks of debris form the plane. But you can see the cracks run up the side. Scary cause it looks like a real proffesional job. The military uses wires that are actually TNT. Imagine that's what that security company put in instead of real cables!
12GaugeLosAngeles 1 year ago
building 7 FREE fall also.....wait a minute what is going on. collapse is one thing but free fall
AIMANALI 1 year ago
@AIMANALI building 7 was the only 1 of the 3 that was a free fall---in a free fall every floor falls simultaneously. towers 1 and 2 did not free fall. they fell from the top down. and they didn't collapse in under ten seconds. they both took at least 15 (I think tower one took about 20).
AntnyDsmn 1 year ago
@AntnyDsmn So where does that leave us. Actually even 20 seconds for that mass to fall is CRAZY. I remember many times looking up at WTCs and thinking damn this is a huge building. I am from NY
AIMANALI 1 year ago
9/11 was the biggest comedy show- a little sad, but comical. I mean aside from getting millions of people to use fiat currency, 9/11 was another example of just how easily it is to herd millions of stupid people using govt propoganda
swu880 1 year ago
WW1, the Soviet Revolution, WW2, The Korean War against "Communism", The destruction and repopulation of East Timor, The "Vietnam" War in Cambodia, Laos and the rest of Indo China, The Gulf "War", the "Wars" against Afghanistan and Iraq, and soon to come, the "war" against Iran, Pakistan, Venezuala and the rest of the civilized world. It's been a hell of a century, literally.
You're government hasn't lied to you before? You're shocked about 9/11? Kennedy, Watergate, Tonkin, WMD's..get it
backtohali 1 year ago
i think that the towers were destroyed by bombs not from airplanes
Grasuuuuu 1 year ago
@Grasuuuuu what you think thousands of people wouldnt see a fucking bomb in there building and people were probably there like twenty for seven so how the hell could any one put one there
az61999 1 year ago
@az61999 Say all you want about how supposedly impossible it was to wire the building. Tell me why forty some witnesses wanting to testify about explosions were not even contacted. Tell me why the one witnesses recounting evidence about explosions had has his info taken down in private and deep-sixed in the final report.
nealkassanoff 1 year ago
Comment removed
caligula212 1 year ago