i do think your mostly right ...the UK ending was way better and our ending ruined the show but beside those facts i think our cast was better i mean john simm is great sure but jason omara harvey keitel and even gel moren...i also think we did a better job creating the show ...if abc didnt change the day it would still be on...but remember there has been an anoucement Ted Turners TNT may pick up the show and act as if the last show never happened..feel free to disagree
no way!! uk version was way better. harvey keitel doesn't even come close to phil glenister as gene hunt and john simm would act the socks off that omara bloke any day of the week. it was a totally unique idea set around our TV shows of the 70's and our music and fasion. your version is just a word for word, scene for scene rip off with no real substance or identity of it's own. keitel is a great actor, but in this he isn't convincing at all. it's a pale imitation of the original, our version!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wut ever first of all im british and my dads american but harvey keitel was way better so was omara we as in my dads side USA had a way better cast.....but im glad i dont talk with that stupid british word BLOKe i mean come on DUDE(american term for man)wen ur talkin to a half american with no british accent speak noramlly>>>>bloke, wut in the world
why would I use the word "dude"? I'm not from California and I don't surf so I'll stick with bloke, youth, chap and geezer! sorry but you are wrong about keitel. don't get me wrong, he's an awesome actor but he's too old for that role and he can't measure up to the real gene hunt (phillip glenister). the american version makes me mad cos it's just a blatent rip off shot with those glossy desperate housewives cameras! it's total GARBAGE(american term for rubbish). sort it out geezer!!!
dude, if you do not know the Manc Lion, then you have not watched the true Life on Mars. Harvey Keitel is good, but he ain't nothing compared to the original!
If it wasn't for that fact that he traveled back into time I wouldn't really like this show as much. I give the show a B- as it is but if you took away the time tavel thing Id only give it a C- the stories are good just not done all that well. I can't see this show lasting more than a few seasons.
Original is without the best by far... i don't know why they have to remake everything.... are americans that dumb they can't watch a show based in another country
I dont usually judge a tv proram before watching it but to be honest that looks like they just nicked the script of the original and got new people to read it because they have accents.
I'm not saying they can't remake it but they could at least come up with a vaguely new story, surely...???
My sympathies to those having to watch this US version instead of the original - the UK one is funny. Sam and Gene are the central driving force and these 2 are not in the same league as John Simm and Philip Glenister!
Get hold of the BBC original if you want to see how it should be with the real Sam Tyler and Gene Genie!
I never thought Id say this - but original Gene Hunt kicks the living bejeeeeeeezus out of Keitels! Harvey was a good choice 15 yrs ago - but damn, why not just hire my grandpa you man united loving french bender poof nancy boys!
I must go now to find the equivilent of the northern sea in wiskey. Later Girls!
The UK version is way better, but once the US version starts getting original about halfway through the series, things get much better. :) I like it!
dominicrusho 1 year ago
so, any americans seen the ashes to ashes finale yet?
douboymk2 1 year ago
John Simm was so good in the UK version.
gyrate4 1 year ago 2
hate to break it to you, philip glenister is a god. i don't reckon this guy would even make a disciple.
CrAzYFeRaLcHiLd 1 year ago
theres only one gene hunt, and its not this one.
imooreory 2 years ago 6
Amen to that!
Kuguaari 2 years ago
I felt they were both good in their own way.
Avengerholic 2 years ago 3
As an american i have seen both versions of the series and without a doubt of honesty i can say the british version was way better
KingDT2007 2 years ago 12
i do think your mostly right ...the UK ending was way better and our ending ruined the show but beside those facts i think our cast was better i mean john simm is great sure but jason omara harvey keitel and even gel moren...i also think we did a better job creating the show ...if abc didnt change the day it would still be on...but remember there has been an anoucement Ted Turners TNT may pick up the show and act as if the last show never happened..feel free to disagree
shinnman1796 2 years ago
no way!! uk version was way better. harvey keitel doesn't even come close to phil glenister as gene hunt and john simm would act the socks off that omara bloke any day of the week. it was a totally unique idea set around our TV shows of the 70's and our music and fasion. your version is just a word for word, scene for scene rip off with no real substance or identity of it's own. keitel is a great actor, but in this he isn't convincing at all. it's a pale imitation of the original, our version!!!
moddave78 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wut ever first of all im british and my dads american but harvey keitel was way better so was omara we as in my dads side USA had a way better cast.....but im glad i dont talk with that stupid british word BLOKe i mean come on DUDE(american term for man)wen ur talkin to a half american with no british accent speak noramlly>>>>bloke, wut in the world
shinnman1796 2 years ago
why would I use the word "dude"? I'm not from California and I don't surf so I'll stick with bloke, youth, chap and geezer! sorry but you are wrong about keitel. don't get me wrong, he's an awesome actor but he's too old for that role and he can't measure up to the real gene hunt (phillip glenister). the american version makes me mad cos it's just a blatent rip off shot with those glossy desperate housewives cameras! it's total GARBAGE(american term for rubbish). sort it out geezer!!!
moddave78 2 years ago 3
@shinnman1796 are you ill?
Tomaloma 1 year ago
Philip Glenister was a much better Gene Hunt.
With lines like:
"You so much as belch out of line and I'll have your scrotum on a barbed wire plate"
and
"This case is moving slower than a spastic in a magnet factory."
That half-wit yank shit stain can't beat the Manc Lion.
partaveitsi 2 years ago 4
See, it's exactly that point that shows this point.
We have DIFFERENT senses of HUMOR. You like that stuff, I like The Lonely Island. We're obviously different.
danwojo812 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dude it's Harvey Keitel man!! Friggin Harvey Keitel!! and who the hell is Manc Lion?
realMule 2 years ago
the manc lion is a nickname, manc is a term for someone from manchester, the city where the english version is set.
partaveitsi 2 years ago 2
dude, if you do not know the Manc Lion, then you have not watched the true Life on Mars. Harvey Keitel is good, but he ain't nothing compared to the original!
Zerrum 1 year ago 3
If it wasn't for that fact that he traveled back into time I wouldn't really like this show as much. I give the show a B- as it is but if you took away the time tavel thing Id only give it a C- the stories are good just not done all that well. I can't see this show lasting more than a few seasons.
davidscalling 2 years ago
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!!!!!!!!!!1
walters1992 2 years ago 2
load of Bollocks - fuck you very much
jaboet1 2 years ago
The original Gene Genie is so much better.
Go Glenister!
Trontador 3 years ago 10
Original is without the best by far... i don't know why they have to remake everything.... are americans that dumb they can't watch a show based in another country
msnowy 3 years ago 2
You're a fucking idiot.
We're here with shows like LOST, Grey's Anatomy, Southland, etc... Shows with great value to them.
And hell, you want to talk about shows "based in another country"...
Why is it that a show like our "The OC" was circuited internationally? So that even countries of foreign languages to our own dubbed it.
"without the best by far". A line like that really showcases your credibility.
TakeshiMomoshiro 2 years ago
original=better.
WaveOBabys 3 years ago 3
Harvey Keitel ain't Gene Hunt! Phil Glenister is the only one who can play DCI Hunt, and no I don't care about silly US ranks either. It's DCI!!!!
Ohyewildthong 3 years ago 3
Harvey Keitel aint Gene Hunt! Phil Glenister is the one and only! Damn yanks messing with our show
destructivedandy 3 years ago 4
I dont usually judge a tv proram before watching it but to be honest that looks like they just nicked the script of the original and got new people to read it because they have accents.
I'm not saying they can't remake it but they could at least come up with a vaguely new story, surely...???
scrabnsam 3 years ago
My sympathies to those having to watch this US version instead of the original - the UK one is funny. Sam and Gene are the central driving force and these 2 are not in the same league as John Simm and Philip Glenister!
Get hold of the BBC original if you want to see how it should be with the real Sam Tyler and Gene Genie!
girlyswot99 3 years ago 5
What? no! who the hell is this guy?
This has nothing on the UK one, and im not even a BBC fan, i normally hate their shows
filafel 3 years ago 2
You've got to be kidding me! ö
Do not tell me that the blonde woman is supposed to be Annie? ö
And this Sam and Gene come nowhere near the original version ö
Melleke1991 3 years ago
that gene hunt is shit the english versin is better he doent look like the penguin
playfulpaul1985 3 years ago 2
I never thought Id say this - but original Gene Hunt kicks the living bejeeeeeeezus out of Keitels! Harvey was a good choice 15 yrs ago - but damn, why not just hire my grandpa you man united loving french bender poof nancy boys!
I must go now to find the equivilent of the northern sea in wiskey. Later Girls!
KirksMerkin 3 years ago 4
complete rip off of the original, right down to the lines.
alilurie 3 years ago
Sure, but there's a lot different about it too. Nothing is completely original these days. Something made from scratch would likely be more formulaic.
I enjoyed the US version of the office, and hopefully this will be good too.
MrHoppyX 3 years ago
it's supose to be a rip off ot the original. that's why it's a "remake"
WaveOBabys 3 years ago
haha Mr White isn't happy!
19911995 3 years ago