I tried EKF, UKF and SIR PF. A comparison can be seen on this paper (an extended version is under review for a journal):
N. Bellotto and H. Hu, People Tracking with a Mobile Robot: a Comparison of Kalman and Particle Filters, Proceedings of the 13th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA 2007), pp. 388-393, 29-31 August 2007, Würzburg, Germany
N. Bellotto and H. Hu, Computationally Efficient Solutions for Tracking People with a Mobile Robot: an Experimental Evaluation of Bayesian Filters, Autonomous Robots, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 425-438, 2010.
What's the degree of nonlinearity of your system model operator and observation operator?
mkhali5 4 years ago
There are more or less standard cartesian-polar conversions, including therefore trigonometric functions, squares, and so on.
Please see one of the recent papers in my homepage for more information.
belush 4 years ago
What's the order of your state and observation vectors?
mkhali5 4 years ago
5 for the state
2 for the legs observation with the laser
3 for the face observation with the camera
belush 4 years ago
did you try using EKF, EnKF, PF?
mkhali5 4 years ago
I tried EKF, UKF and SIR PF. A comparison can be seen on this paper (an extended version is under review for a journal):
N. Bellotto and H. Hu, People Tracking with a Mobile Robot: a Comparison of Kalman and Particle Filters, Proceedings of the 13th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA 2007), pp. 388-393, 29-31 August 2007, Würzburg, Germany
belush 4 years ago
journal version:
N. Bellotto and H. Hu, Computationally Efficient Solutions for Tracking People with a Mobile Robot: an Experimental Evaluation of Bayesian Filters, Autonomous Robots, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 425-438, 2010.
belush 1 month ago
Great work guys
decepto5 4 years ago