my question is this: how can a human breed with a so called hominoid? hominoids and humans should have different amounts of chromosomes so it makes no sense. sorry lloyd but at least that part of your idea should be wrong
@zwiguy9494 As the story is told, they did have intercourse, and the offspring was found and dug up. And not to mention, of course its impossible to mate with monkeys, but technically we dont know what would happen if we had sex with a bigfoot.
When Sitchin wrote his books, only "specialists" could read the Sumerian language, but sources such as the 2006 book "Sumerian Lexicon" have made the language more accessible to non-experts. I am not saying he was 100% right. But I am saying for every PHD there is an equal and opposite PHD. To say he was COMPLETELY wrong, means your brainwashed by the young turks who still hold zeal over anthropology.
I have no doubt that, in the fullness of time, historians will consider Zecharia Sitchin vastly more correct than any mainstream pundit in alive at this moment. Why? Because modern scholars endure years of intense training to consider the work of prior scholars sancrosanct, which turns out a virtual army of close-minded sycophants who, ultimately, will be dismissed as the laughable fools they are.
How about you actually look up what the proper scholars at universities say about Zecharia Sitchin, that he doesn't know ANY ancient Sumerian AT ALL, and simply makes it up!
@GnosticHumanist Why do you think so?? When the early translators came upon passages that could have been and should have been interpreted the way Sitchin interpreted them, they had no conceivable frame of reference for such terminology. Sitchin rightly jettisoned the nonsense and translated the texts more like they were actually written, calling an alien an alien, so to speak, and this gross offense to modern academic sensibilities is what classic scholars considera sacrilege to their mindset.
I don't think you quite understoof what I just said: all actual proper scholars of the Sumerian language point out that Sitchin doesn't know ANYTHING about it and he simply makes it all up!
@GnosticHumanist How could he not know ANYTHING. He studied it longer than most people while he was alive. No, You Sir, misunderstood what I said. I asked "Why do you think so" Why would say he didn't know ANYTHING. listen, they shoehorned it to fit into their own restricted world views, and because this nonsense was created by "experts" of that time, modern experts have inevitably been brainwashed by their education process to believe that no other translation is needed, much less preferable.
Simple. Does Sitchin actually have ANY education in ancient languages? NO. NONE.
This coupled with the fact that those with PhDs and professorships on the topic point out that his translations are just entirel6y made-up garbage, shows that you've fallen for the work of a charlatan.
Then again it seems you WANT to believe this nonsense, and don't actually care about reality.
Lloyd Pye is correct...many want so badly to be wrong because arrogant scientists/atheists are too arrogant to believe that they are not the highest form of intelligent life in the universe. I am not religious at all; I just understand that what we now call aliens, ancient civilizations used to call gods.
If the Hominoids were completely covered with hari, why was their skin dark? Apes, and all other hair-covered animals today have very pale skin due to a lack of melanin-producing cells. This makes sense as hair-covered skin would not be exposed to Ulta-violet Rays from the Sun. His theory that the hybrid decendants of the hominoid had darker skin is not biologically consistent.
@GnosticHumanist Anyone who says Zecharia Sitchin is a fraud or mistaken in his translations of Sumerian texts, or anything in that vein, is busily grinding a heavily worn axe. They base all of their complaints on the fact that in certain key areas of the Sumerian writings, he deviates markedly from the "classical" translations, the vast majority of which were completed before 1947, before the terms "UFO" or "alien" came into common usage.
and if the african human alien miner hybrid was engineered to be less intellegent that fully explains why neanderthal had 100cc larger brain that "humans"....and explains why celtic people have larger that average skulls...
and explains why whites and asians, having been backcrossed onto pure early humans, are much more intelligent races that blacks today...
no racism intended!!!!1 its just the truth of things...
so acurately explains genetic varation and differences in the various human races...the part where he mentions that there were 4 early hominids ect...interesting enough there are 4bloodtypes.and the sumarian writings saying that an engineering of alien and african ape to mine gold explains the out of africa theory which seemed like 100%bullshit to me. it wasnt AFRICANS that left africa it was RH- hybrids that left and interbred with neanderthal in europe & asia.
@ 5:10 he's talking about the leaps that humans made in the Fertile Crescent. I imagine some over simplistic dreamer in 10,000 years, looking back at the technological progress that we made between 1700-1900 and 1970-present, and saying it was impossible. ‘Only gradual steps could lead to such improvements, say the Darwinists’ they would claim. Yeah, looking through tinted glasses that give a more interesting (not in my opinion) explanation than the amazing achievements of evolution.
@dxn283 those are leaps made in ideas, equipment produced, therefore culture. This theory is talking about the leaps made in physical attributes. Ones which are simply impossible in terms of evolution in the timescale currently told by the experts. Not the same thing at all.
Someone plz correct me. If humans have 46 chromosomes and every other humanoid has/had 48, how is it possible that this prehuman woman gave birth to hybrid children???? humans and he could not breed same as humans and apes cannot breed.
Very good question! And why did a hominid that was completely covered with hair have dark skin? Apes,and all other hair-covered animals have very pale skin due to the lack of their skin being exposed to UV Rays, thus no need to produce melanin.
I haven't really been following,but.... how did we go from disproving evolution to cyrptoids? All he is doing is talking about are other species on the planet
What a shame those rustics raped the poor thing! If not for their confused, brazen sexual whims the world would never know the infamous Valuev (for those who aren't into boxing, the
@LeoInterHyenaem i know. it is so disturbing that they were having sex with a sasquatch or whatever you determine her to be. imagine how sad she was to be kept there prisoner, but then having all those nasty men having sex with her? its like my ancestors. they were looked at as chattel, used to work till they died, yet the "master" would creep out of his wife's bed at night and have sex with his "chattel" ... what does that say about the person who behaves that way..?
prove me wrong if you can, but i have found that all this reptilian b.s. is merely symbolic, if you ask me, it points to ophiucus (serpenterius) constellation, the 13th zodiac sign, which has tons of hermetic, astrological, mathematical, psychological significance.
@VredesStal Science has no obligation to answer any questions. I get tired of people saying that as if science is some kind of service to them. Science is composed of scientists, who are people. Scientists pursue things they are interested in. If Llyod Pye is interested in his theories, he should pursue a PhD and get funding to research it himself or if you want answers, do it yourself.
this is the best series i have seen in a long time. thanks. too bad though there are so many immature idiots writing stupid comments here. thank you for posting this. its very amazing to those of us who are adult enough to want to learn, research life, and our planet. i can't believe someone would actually write their wife is an ape. i hope your wife reads that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal You say, "Again theres certainly no guarantee that Pye is 100% correct... " and that is the only thing correct that you have said. In the end, assuming that there is an end to this out-of-tune Pye Parade and this alleged "DNA analysis is complete, then will you (YOU) be in any position to draw any conclusions? Using what measure will you be able to decide if he is "correct", and if so, by what degree will you make your conclusions?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal Carl Sagan once said something that is very relevant to this discussion: "The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses". It is humorous for you to speak of "interesting questions" and "compelling arguments" when you have demonstrated a compete lack of understanding of the topic altogether. How on Earth could you know where to begin on any of this and be in the position of sufficient knowledge to make such a judgement?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal There is no connection between shattering my ego and whether people take you seriously. That statement does not make sense. You do not have the education to know what such questions might be, and whether they have been answered long ago or remain on the horizon. that is the whole point of having an education in science. That Pye may be interesting to you is simply a testament to the type of people he attracts--those who do not know any better. Charisma without content is quackery.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal I did not answer my own question when I quoted you (below). I used it to explain how much BS is being floated here by using some anonymous "geneticist" (who is?), and some "study" (which is?). This kind of logic is laughable. How can you expect to say the things you are saying, continuing to talk at a content level of information sub-university science, and expect to be taken seriously? As I have said, asking questions that have not been answered is fine, but understand the content.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal Yes, I quoted what you said, "At the end of this presentation, Lloyd Pye discusses a letter he recieved from an anonymous source who claimed to be a geneticist. This "source" referenced a published study that the human Y-chromosome (which is passed only from fathers to sons) does not have any of the same homologues that are seen on other primate Y-chromosomes. This is indicative that the Y-DNA seen in human males might have come from elsewhere else." Which "geneticist"? "study"?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal Why have you not read the articles that I have sent you and why are you still obsessing on issues that were resolved a long time ago? Why don't you know this? I don't understand how it is that you can hope to understand when you have never taken a science course in your life and you refuse to do so now. You refuse to understand what science accepts without any basis for your skepticism. I would understand if you had questions that demonstrated an understanding, but you don't.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal First off, are you comparing Pye to Hawking? If so, against what metric? SH is a brilliant man, respected as one of, if not, the, top mind of the 21st Century. And Pye? He is not recognised by any scientific organization anywhere on the planet. The comparison is a non sequitur and is moot. Tell me where he has ever been published that is respected as a credible scientific journal. Tell me what faculty position he sits on? Which university does he do research at? Come on.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@VredesStal And so why is there not a single scientist living on Planet Earth willing to agreed with you, while they dismiss Pye as a crackpot? The logic of what you have just said about human evolution is nonsensical, and you predicate a position of Pye's that he claims is based on an "anonymous source", as if that is science? Come on....seriously. "This is indicative that the Y-DNA seen in human males might have come from elsewhere else"....and the evidence for this statement is what? BS!
@VredesStal i've watched all the documentaries i could find on human origins/starchild, i like the guy, he seems to really believe what he says is true, the fact is, he presents his case and theory well and its his "sincerity and tone of voice" that makes it seem "plausible", those DNA results are paramount to his case, without tangible scientific evidence, there will be no change in mainstream thinking
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@midnightmorning Instead of watching kooky videos on the subject of human evolution, why wouldn't you get an education, a legitmate one, from a credible university? Just because this guy convinces you that he "believes", is not a good enough reason to ACCEPT. Why would anyone accept a theory that is not supported by scientific evidence? Why is there no evidence, not a single word of it, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals? How about, because none exists.
why do so many people think these theories are so wacky but accept this?
Christianity:
The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
@midnightmorning - thanks! I wish I had written it, but I didn't... no idea who did, but it sums it up nicely, and best of all, COHERENTLY; no flowery language or symbolism & allegory, just the 'facts', as they claim them to be. It shows just how preposterous it all is! It's nothing but a control system.
@Triplexity So your gonna believe a trnascript between david icke and some dude who claims too see sitchin, and several other people shape shift into lizard people and talk about disinforming people?
I personally like david icke, but Sitchin is very well onformed, yeah he made errors in translating, but Sumerian is a dead language, try and find NYONE who can fully trnalsate it without error
@Triplexity Sitchin works for the NWO? Under what evidence? Im pretty sure the royal families of the banks (rockefellers, rothschilds, etc) dont want the 12th planet, and your origins, and that theres Aliens flying around space. to be known by the public
This story is not correct. According to modern current history based an ARCAIM archeological discovery in Siberia, Sumerian civilization was derived from ancient Aryan (Vedic) not the other way.
Makes me think of the Russian boxer, Nikolai Valuev.. hit him up and you'll know what I mean. This story gets more flesh to the bones after gazing upon that man. Freaky!
It is true that DNA of human are different from apes. But how did he came to the QUANTUM LEAP CONCLUSION that therefore "Aliens" genetically engineered human DNA from the ape DNA. This is worse than PSEUDO SCIENCE . Its pure speculation/boloney.
Its not his(Mr. Pye) conclusion, its the conclusion of Mr. Stichens life work translating sumerian written history. Is the study of ancient language pseudo science? (?) There is no 'agreement' in science. Science is a history of wrong moves, eventually rectified.
You have to embrace the thinking that the UFO phenom is real... and that the potential for intervention on this world is real.. I'm not blind to any of the evidence.
The smoking gun for genetic intervention are the number of chromes, ours dont match with primates. We cant be directly related, hence the genetic manipulation theory. Are there glitches in this video, yes - but put together from 6k old writings (or older) I think its pretty convincing.
don't forget that modern science is only 500 years old. It would be unwise to believe everything they say. They're all afraid of loosing their authority in science.
He contradicts himself. If they were able to reproduce with the big foot female, that means they are not of other specie therefor they must be considered as humans too, therefor theres a conection between them and us, and not like he says. The documentqary is good but he fucks it up here
Their chromosome count would have remained the same in that case. But, it didnt. Human beings have less than primates. Our entire existence goes against evolution. We are a combination of animal and alien DNA.
No. Interspecies breeding is possible, especially if the species are similar enough. Mules are the usual example, being the offspring of horses and donkeys (I think). The offspring of these offspring are rarely able to reproduce themselves (though miracle of miracles sometimes they can).
Still, when he starts pulling this vast cosmology from the sumerian texts, he's lost me.
IN 12 years of gov run education i only had 2 teachers with 3/4 the amount of enthuseasem of Lloyd Pye, sad realy,,but the gov gets what the gove pays 4!!!
if niberu comes through agen that will be a big big bowl of shut the fuck up to all of pop sciance, you have to realize science is 90%wrong,, untell it is write,lol if we look at the best science of 50/100/300 years ago it gets inacuret quick, i never belived in evolution of man, just never set write with me. and we mess with dna now,so?
everyone here is so corrupted they cant consider that maybe the things we are told our whole lives is a lie... for instance religion. this guy has a point and its just as good as anything else we have been told
"Take my word", "Go with me on this" (I have no evidence but just trust in me), Reminds me of the Snake in the Jungle Book. Here is an idea. How about extracting a sample of DNA from the Grand Children? I mean the Skull is interesting for sure, but if the Grand Children are still living, then where is the DNA?
Exactly! It is a stretch of the imagination isn't Frog1234567891011? This guy takes a bunch of half ass, psudo-science theories and then attempts to weave together this mess? I think he is only interested in selling his book; which sounds to me like, is a collection of already express opinions and stories, we have heard a hundred times before. How about a creative thought?
I more than agree. What really get's me, though, is when he mentions the grandchildren. Hybrids like mules and ligers are steril. The definition of a species is when two members of the same species interbreed they are able to have nonsteril offspring. So, either the story is complete BS (which is where I'm leaning) or Kvet's mother is human.
the story is legit up untill the grandchildren part which he mixed up, and dont get up on his ass about it we all make little mistakes he doesn't know EVERYTHING
Everyone speaks of a missing link. Where is the evolution link? Where are the chips/ apes of today learning farming mining the basics of civilzation. Or just any example of intellegnce of any species making civilization
I grew up in the soviet union and i did hear from local documentaries about this story. There was a woman like he describes. Not to mention, that I have read or watched the evidence for most of his anthropologycal research...most of it I can say was rather well documented.. so no reason to claim he is a scam..
if you read sumerian mythology, the planet they call nibiru is actually the planet saturn. look up saturnus or the god saturnus and it will explain that maybe this planet is the key to our past.
@Antisyzygy yea i have read alot about all this b.s. over the past year , don't know what to believe, it seems that everyone has the answer with no evidence. planet nibiru could simply be mythology. I looked all over sumerian mythology, i see no mention of an alien race creating us. it seems like this guy is merely interpreting things in his own way. saturn has lots of occult symbolism, as above so below, besides that i have found nothing.
@Antisyzygy there is only a theory that perhaps once saturn was closer to us at some point, no real evidence as far as i know. you really have to ask yourself, at the end of the day, does it matter? i say no, just live your life in peace and let positiveness cure our fears.
@maximusTLP Saturn is a gas giant. It is absolutely massive compared to Earth and well, composed of gas, meaning it has no surface to walk upon and has pressures which would crush you into a sardine can. It would have similar properties if it was closer to the sun. Its been in its orbit for millions of years, which is longer than humans have been around by thousands of magnitudes. The evidence can be proven easily by mathematics.
If you read what the actual Sumerian documents say, you will see that that this guy is handing out nothing but dis-information. Intriguing, yes, but it's not true. The creation story told here has nothing to do with what the Sumerians really believed. His source is from Sitchin - who is widely discredited by many historians and even by myself after doing my own research.
If you just view it as "Theory" and not religion/belief. No harm done right? But I'm sure there's some people who would watch this and fly off the handle...
Well, but you know what? Sitchin has been identified by David Icke and others as a disinformer, a misleader. When David talked to Sitchin about the reptilian symbolism in the ancient records, Sitchin warned him not to write about it. Watch, "The Reptilian Agenda."
@worryphree So your gonna believe a trnascript between david icke and some dude who claims too see sitchin, and several other people shape shift into lizard people and talk about disinforming people?
I personally like david icke, but Sitchin is very well onformed, yeah he made errors in translating, but Sumerian is a dead language, try and find NYONE who can fully trnalsate it without error
I would agree...Clearly an extreme variation on the norm.
Clearly a Hybrid. Clearly ugly enough to make a freight train take a dirt road & also has the weirdest looking combo of a lack of & as well a semblance of a *Forehead*.
Had a Tatar grandfather, Once on a hunt not far from St. Petersburg, it is said Valuev wrestled & killed a wild boar using only his hands and teeth. (YIKES!!!).
As long as these scholars keep their focus in Mesopotamia/Sumer and out of the Nile valley (where this first cosmogony, script, and civilization really originate)- they will be on a wild goose chase. (Which may be a good thing)
im sorry; not should be wrong, is wrong
zwiguy9494 4 weeks ago
my question is this: how can a human breed with a so called hominoid? hominoids and humans should have different amounts of chromosomes so it makes no sense. sorry lloyd but at least that part of your idea should be wrong
zwiguy9494 4 weeks ago
@zwiguy9494 As the story is told, they did have intercourse, and the offspring was found and dug up. And not to mention, of course its impossible to mate with monkeys, but technically we dont know what would happen if we had sex with a bigfoot.
TheHeretic333 4 weeks ago
When Sitchin wrote his books, only "specialists" could read the Sumerian language, but sources such as the 2006 book "Sumerian Lexicon" have made the language more accessible to non-experts. I am not saying he was 100% right. But I am saying for every PHD there is an equal and opposite PHD. To say he was COMPLETELY wrong, means your brainwashed by the young turks who still hold zeal over anthropology.
TheHeretic333 1 month ago
I have no doubt that, in the fullness of time, historians will consider Zecharia Sitchin vastly more correct than any mainstream pundit in alive at this moment. Why? Because modern scholars endure years of intense training to consider the work of prior scholars sancrosanct, which turns out a virtual army of close-minded sycophants who, ultimately, will be dismissed as the laughable fools they are.
TheHeretic333 1 month ago
@TheHeretic333
How about you actually look up what the proper scholars at universities say about Zecharia Sitchin, that he doesn't know ANY ancient Sumerian AT ALL, and simply makes it up!
GnosticHumanist 1 month ago
@GnosticHumanist Why do you think so?? When the early translators came upon passages that could have been and should have been interpreted the way Sitchin interpreted them, they had no conceivable frame of reference for such terminology. Sitchin rightly jettisoned the nonsense and translated the texts more like they were actually written, calling an alien an alien, so to speak, and this gross offense to modern academic sensibilities is what classic scholars considera sacrilege to their mindset.
TheHeretic333 1 month ago
@TheHeretic333
I don't think you quite understoof what I just said: all actual proper scholars of the Sumerian language point out that Sitchin doesn't know ANYTHING about it and he simply makes it all up!
GnosticHumanist 1 month ago
@GnosticHumanist How could he not know ANYTHING. He studied it longer than most people while he was alive. No, You Sir, misunderstood what I said. I asked "Why do you think so" Why would say he didn't know ANYTHING. listen, they shoehorned it to fit into their own restricted world views, and because this nonsense was created by "experts" of that time, modern experts have inevitably been brainwashed by their education process to believe that no other translation is needed, much less preferable.
TheHeretic333 1 month ago
@TheHeretic333
Simple. Does Sitchin actually have ANY education in ancient languages? NO. NONE.
This coupled with the fact that those with PhDs and professorships on the topic point out that his translations are just entirel6y made-up garbage, shows that you've fallen for the work of a charlatan.
Then again it seems you WANT to believe this nonsense, and don't actually care about reality.
GnosticHumanist 1 month ago
Lloyd Pye is correct...many want so badly to be wrong because arrogant scientists/atheists are too arrogant to believe that they are not the highest form of intelligent life in the universe. I am not religious at all; I just understand that what we now call aliens, ancient civilizations used to call gods.
ButterCookie1984 1 month ago
If the Hominoids were completely covered with hari, why was their skin dark? Apes, and all other hair-covered animals today have very pale skin due to a lack of melanin-producing cells. This makes sense as hair-covered skin would not be exposed to Ulta-violet Rays from the Sun. His theory that the hybrid decendants of the hominoid had darker skin is not biologically consistent.
jarrhaman 2 months ago
"Ugly enough to make a freight train take a dirt road" LOL!
jamiecoursey 3 months ago in playlist Human Origins: Lloyd Pye & Intervention Theories
What rubbish.
It was discovered that Sitchin doesn't even know ANY ancient Sumerian, he made the everything up.
This is pointed out by ACTUAL ancient Sumerian scholars who say that absolutely nothing of what Sitchin says is what is written in the ancient texts!
GnosticHumanist 4 months ago
@GnosticHumanist Anyone who says Zecharia Sitchin is a fraud or mistaken in his translations of Sumerian texts, or anything in that vein, is busily grinding a heavily worn axe. They base all of their complaints on the fact that in certain key areas of the Sumerian writings, he deviates markedly from the "classical" translations, the vast majority of which were completed before 1947, before the terms "UFO" or "alien" came into common usage.
TheHeretic333 1 month ago
and if the african human alien miner hybrid was engineered to be less intellegent that fully explains why neanderthal had 100cc larger brain that "humans"....and explains why celtic people have larger that average skulls...
and explains why whites and asians, having been backcrossed onto pure early humans, are much more intelligent races that blacks today...
no racism intended!!!!1 its just the truth of things...
MyBelowme 4 months ago
extremely well informed lecture!
so acurately explains genetic varation and differences in the various human races...the part where he mentions that there were 4 early hominids ect...interesting enough there are 4bloodtypes.and the sumarian writings saying that an engineering of alien and african ape to mine gold explains the out of africa theory which seemed like 100%bullshit to me. it wasnt AFRICANS that left africa it was RH- hybrids that left and interbred with neanderthal in europe & asia.
MyBelowme 4 months ago
@ 5:10 he's talking about the leaps that humans made in the Fertile Crescent. I imagine some over simplistic dreamer in 10,000 years, looking back at the technological progress that we made between 1700-1900 and 1970-present, and saying it was impossible. ‘Only gradual steps could lead to such improvements, say the Darwinists’ they would claim. Yeah, looking through tinted glasses that give a more interesting (not in my opinion) explanation than the amazing achievements of evolution.
dxn283 6 months ago
@dxn283 those are leaps made in ideas, equipment produced, therefore culture. This theory is talking about the leaps made in physical attributes. Ones which are simply impossible in terms of evolution in the timescale currently told by the experts. Not the same thing at all.
odela1 6 months ago
Someone plz correct me. If humans have 46 chromosomes and every other humanoid has/had 48, how is it possible that this prehuman woman gave birth to hybrid children???? humans and he could not breed same as humans and apes cannot breed.
tstein05 6 months ago
Very good question! And why did a hominid that was completely covered with hair have dark skin? Apes,and all other hair-covered animals have very pale skin due to the lack of their skin being exposed to UV Rays, thus no need to produce melanin.
jarrhaman 2 months ago
I haven't really been following,but.... how did we go from disproving evolution to cyrptoids? All he is doing is talking about are other species on the planet
sailornaruto39 7 months ago
See? Borat was telling the truth!
Illuminated512 7 months ago
I'm curious, if Valuev is the son, the grandson, or the great grandson of the alma.
LeoInterHyenaem 8 months ago
...hideous lump that held the title of the heavyweight quasi-champion of the world prior to receiving some spanking from Igbargimov and Haye).
LeoInterHyenaem 8 months ago
What a shame those rustics raped the poor thing! If not for their confused, brazen sexual whims the world would never know the infamous Valuev (for those who aren't into boxing, the
LeoInterHyenaem 8 months ago
@LeoInterHyenaem i know. it is so disturbing that they were having sex with a sasquatch or whatever you determine her to be. imagine how sad she was to be kept there prisoner, but then having all those nasty men having sex with her? its like my ancestors. they were looked at as chattel, used to work till they died, yet the "master" would creep out of his wife's bed at night and have sex with his "chattel" ... what does that say about the person who behaves that way..?
indibabs122275 8 months ago
Sounds crazy enough to be true.. Time will tell.
dtpchilli4life 11 months ago
prove me wrong if you can, but i have found that all this reptilian b.s. is merely symbolic, if you ask me, it points to ophiucus (serpenterius) constellation, the 13th zodiac sign, which has tons of hermetic, astrological, mathematical, psychological significance.
maximusTLP 11 months ago
@maximusTLP awesome theory. i like it!
indibabs122275 8 months ago
@VredesStal Science has no obligation to answer any questions. I get tired of people saying that as if science is some kind of service to them. Science is composed of scientists, who are people. Scientists pursue things they are interested in. If Llyod Pye is interested in his theories, he should pursue a PhD and get funding to research it himself or if you want answers, do it yourself.
Antisyzygy 11 months ago
The Dare Ialand Enigma is a novel concerning an alternative view of evolution see video book trailer
dltanner99 1 year ago
this is the best series i have seen in a long time. thanks. too bad though there are so many immature idiots writing stupid comments here. thank you for posting this. its very amazing to those of us who are adult enough to want to learn, research life, and our planet. i can't believe someone would actually write their wife is an ape. i hope your wife reads that.
indibabs122275 1 year ago
is a bullshit? your a bullshit aha you toad
bluefly28 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal You say, "Again theres certainly no guarantee that Pye is 100% correct... " and that is the only thing correct that you have said. In the end, assuming that there is an end to this out-of-tune Pye Parade and this alleged "DNA analysis is complete, then will you (YOU) be in any position to draw any conclusions? Using what measure will you be able to decide if he is "correct", and if so, by what degree will you make your conclusions?
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal Carl Sagan once said something that is very relevant to this discussion: "The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses". It is humorous for you to speak of "interesting questions" and "compelling arguments" when you have demonstrated a compete lack of understanding of the topic altogether. How on Earth could you know where to begin on any of this and be in the position of sufficient knowledge to make such a judgement?
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal There is no connection between shattering my ego and whether people take you seriously. That statement does not make sense. You do not have the education to know what such questions might be, and whether they have been answered long ago or remain on the horizon. that is the whole point of having an education in science. That Pye may be interesting to you is simply a testament to the type of people he attracts--those who do not know any better. Charisma without content is quackery.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal I did not answer my own question when I quoted you (below). I used it to explain how much BS is being floated here by using some anonymous "geneticist" (who is?), and some "study" (which is?). This kind of logic is laughable. How can you expect to say the things you are saying, continuing to talk at a content level of information sub-university science, and expect to be taken seriously? As I have said, asking questions that have not been answered is fine, but understand the content.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal Yes, I quoted what you said, "At the end of this presentation, Lloyd Pye discusses a letter he recieved from an anonymous source who claimed to be a geneticist. This "source" referenced a published study that the human Y-chromosome (which is passed only from fathers to sons) does not have any of the same homologues that are seen on other primate Y-chromosomes. This is indicative that the Y-DNA seen in human males might have come from elsewhere else." Which "geneticist"? "study"?
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal Why have you not read the articles that I have sent you and why are you still obsessing on issues that were resolved a long time ago? Why don't you know this? I don't understand how it is that you can hope to understand when you have never taken a science course in your life and you refuse to do so now. You refuse to understand what science accepts without any basis for your skepticism. I would understand if you had questions that demonstrated an understanding, but you don't.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal First off, are you comparing Pye to Hawking? If so, against what metric? SH is a brilliant man, respected as one of, if not, the, top mind of the 21st Century. And Pye? He is not recognised by any scientific organization anywhere on the planet. The comparison is a non sequitur and is moot. Tell me where he has ever been published that is respected as a credible scientific journal. Tell me what faculty position he sits on? Which university does he do research at? Come on.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@VredesStal And so why is there not a single scientist living on Planet Earth willing to agreed with you, while they dismiss Pye as a crackpot? The logic of what you have just said about human evolution is nonsensical, and you predicate a position of Pye's that he claims is based on an "anonymous source", as if that is science? Come on....seriously. "This is indicative that the Y-DNA seen in human males might have come from elsewhere else"....and the evidence for this statement is what? BS!
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
Comment removed
midnightmorning 1 year ago
@VredesStal i've watched all the documentaries i could find on human origins/starchild, i like the guy, he seems to really believe what he says is true, the fact is, he presents his case and theory well and its his "sincerity and tone of voice" that makes it seem "plausible", those DNA results are paramount to his case, without tangible scientific evidence, there will be no change in mainstream thinking
midnightmorning 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@midnightmorning Instead of watching kooky videos on the subject of human evolution, why wouldn't you get an education, a legitmate one, from a credible university? Just because this guy convinces you that he "believes", is not a good enough reason to ACCEPT. Why would anyone accept a theory that is not supported by scientific evidence? Why is there no evidence, not a single word of it, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals? How about, because none exists.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
why do so many people think these theories are so wacky but accept this?
Christianity:
The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
tony93666 1 year ago
@tony93666 well put
midnightmorning 1 year ago
@midnightmorning - thanks! I wish I had written it, but I didn't... no idea who did, but it sums it up nicely, and best of all, COHERENTLY; no flowery language or symbolism & allegory, just the 'facts', as they claim them to be. It shows just how preposterous it all is! It's nothing but a control system.
tony93666 1 year ago
its his sincerity and tone of voice that makes his theory seem plausible
midnightmorning 1 year ago
@ Worryphree and Triplexity
You two make me laugh. Remember Beeker and Honeydew from the Muppets? Kinda like that.
MikeGleeson1 1 year ago
Science isn't as objective as people believe. They interpret things in a way which always fits the mainstream narrative of the time.
Castaril 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Triplexity video has been deleted
golubinja 1 year ago
@Triplexity So your gonna believe a trnascript between david icke and some dude who claims too see sitchin, and several other people shape shift into lizard people and talk about disinforming people?
I personally like david icke, but Sitchin is very well onformed, yeah he made errors in translating, but Sumerian is a dead language, try and find NYONE who can fully trnalsate it without error
Godsmack0Believe 1 year ago
@Triplexity Sitchin works for the NWO? Under what evidence? Im pretty sure the royal families of the banks (rockefellers, rothschilds, etc) dont want the 12th planet, and your origins, and that theres Aliens flying around space. to be known by the public
Godsmack0Believe 1 year ago
All I can say is ones mind open!
mobilechief 1 year ago
why does the video stop at 2:46
BePrepared2012 1 year ago
This story is not correct. According to modern current history based an ARCAIM archeological discovery in Siberia, Sumerian civilization was derived from ancient Aryan (Vedic) not the other way.
wlodzio47 1 year ago
Georgians and other Caucasians are direct Descendants of Sumerians
GeoTaoKlarjetMoschoi 1 year ago
Sumerians were Caucasians
GeoTaoKlarjetMoschoi 1 year ago
@GeoTaoKlarjetMoschoi Of course you right also Egyptian and ancient Greeks.
wlodzio47 1 year ago
Makes me think of the Russian boxer, Nikolai Valuev.. hit him up and you'll know what I mean. This story gets more flesh to the bones after gazing upon that man. Freaky!
ChrisSkills 1 year ago
The asteroid belt part is my favorite. I always find it interesting. As well as the Sumerian creation story.
Moorecore 2 years ago
It is true that DNA of human are different from apes. But how did he came to the QUANTUM LEAP CONCLUSION that therefore "Aliens" genetically engineered human DNA from the ape DNA. This is worse than PSEUDO SCIENCE . Its pure speculation/boloney.
danny3571 2 years ago
@sanny3571
Its not his(Mr. Pye) conclusion, its the conclusion of Mr. Stichens life work translating sumerian written history. Is the study of ancient language pseudo science? (?) There is no 'agreement' in science. Science is a history of wrong moves, eventually rectified.
You have to embrace the thinking that the UFO phenom is real... and that the potential for intervention on this world is real.. I'm not blind to any of the evidence.
I believe the 'Bigfoot ' eye wittnesses!
Why can't you?
PDSalling 2 years ago
The smoking gun for genetic intervention are the number of chromes, ours dont match with primates. We cant be directly related, hence the genetic manipulation theory. Are there glitches in this video, yes - but put together from 6k old writings (or older) I think its pretty convincing.
shadowpunk93 2 years ago
don't forget that modern science is only 500 years old. It would be unwise to believe everything they say. They're all afraid of loosing their authority in science.
noxiousq12 2 years ago
He contradicts himself. If they were able to reproduce with the big foot female, that means they are not of other specie therefor they must be considered as humans too, therefor theres a conection between them and us, and not like he says. The documentqary is good but he fucks it up here
bluenightwings 2 years ago
What makes you think Neanderthal and Homo Sapien didn't interbreed to become the Homo Sapien we are now?
w w w . livescience . com / history/090721-neanderthal-murder . html
Surah72 2 years ago
Their chromosome count would have remained the same in that case. But, it didnt. Human beings have less than primates. Our entire existence goes against evolution. We are a combination of animal and alien DNA.
tisdue 2 years ago
Where is proof of Neanderthal chromosome count being different than Homo Sapien?
We are not a combination of Animal and Alien DNA.
Surah72 2 years ago
Do your own research. Then you can have an opinion.
tisdue 2 years ago
Did. Got one.
Explanation is not proof.
The fact you cannot bring proofs to back up your opinion speaks volumes.
Surah72 2 years ago
No. Interspecies breeding is possible, especially if the species are similar enough. Mules are the usual example, being the offspring of horses and donkeys (I think). The offspring of these offspring are rarely able to reproduce themselves (though miracle of miracles sometimes they can).
Still, when he starts pulling this vast cosmology from the sumerian texts, he's lost me.
postindustrialist 2 years ago
This man is insane.
That is all.
TheWildMagic 2 years ago
IN 12 years of gov run education i only had 2 teachers with 3/4 the amount of enthuseasem of Lloyd Pye, sad realy,,but the gov gets what the gove pays 4!!!
if niberu comes through agen that will be a big big bowl of shut the fuck up to all of pop sciance, you have to realize science is 90%wrong,, untell it is write,lol if we look at the best science of 50/100/300 years ago it gets inacuret quick, i never belived in evolution of man, just never set write with me. and we mess with dna now,so?
DANTHETUBEMAN 2 years ago
everyone here is so corrupted they cant consider that maybe the things we are told our whole lives is a lie... for instance religion. this guy has a point and its just as good as anything else we have been told
RIBBERSMECK 2 years ago
"Take my word", "Go with me on this" (I have no evidence but just trust in me), Reminds me of the Snake in the Jungle Book. Here is an idea. How about extracting a sample of DNA from the Grand Children? I mean the Skull is interesting for sure, but if the Grand Children are still living, then where is the DNA?
jupy921 2 years ago
u rlly think those ugly ass guys had children? XD
frog12345667891011 2 years ago
Exactly! It is a stretch of the imagination isn't Frog1234567891011? This guy takes a bunch of half ass, psudo-science theories and then attempts to weave together this mess? I think he is only interested in selling his book; which sounds to me like, is a collection of already express opinions and stories, we have heard a hundred times before. How about a creative thought?
jupy921 2 years ago
Im married to a woman who is on first appearence completely human , but i am convinced after watching this that she is an ape.
No Shit.
corkagh 2 years ago 20
she must be one ugly mother fucker. And you must also be rather hideous to have married her.
pdderek 2 years ago
@corkagh have you not seen her before marriage or do you like apes? :-)
lianania 9 months ago in playlist Human origins
hey dawg, is it cool if i sleep with ur bigfoot?
albinoblood 2 years ago
if kvet is homonoid/human doesnt he contradict the possibility of a missing link by believing this story?
ricken12345 2 years ago
I more than agree. What really get's me, though, is when he mentions the grandchildren. Hybrids like mules and ligers are steril. The definition of a species is when two members of the same species interbreed they are able to have nonsteril offspring. So, either the story is complete BS (which is where I'm leaning) or Kvet's mother is human.
11harry13 2 years ago
the story is legit up untill the grandchildren part which he mixed up, and dont get up on his ass about it we all make little mistakes he doesn't know EVERYTHING
frog12345667891011 2 years ago
Everyone speaks of a missing link. Where is the evolution link? Where are the chips/ apes of today learning farming mining the basics of civilzation. Or just any example of intellegnce of any species making civilization
anthonyw713 2 years ago
Actually no, kvet was 50/50.
The so-called missing link wouldn't have any human. It's human that would have some of the missing link.
But.... there is no missing link.
But they will say, "We're still looking."
AzBirdDog 2 years ago
I grew up in the soviet union and i did hear from local documentaries about this story. There was a woman like he describes. Not to mention, that I have read or watched the evidence for most of his anthropologycal research...most of it I can say was rather well documented.. so no reason to claim he is a scam..
chernomo 2 years ago
what stray planet on the news is he talking about? i never saw anything like that.
blagevil 2 years ago
Try Google, the story may have come out before you were born. :-)
nikoguitarshow 2 years ago
is it? what about the pictures of reptillian hybrids? and the eyes that turn into rep. eyes??
DMCpro6944 2 years ago
that boxer?
LOL, yea i think you're right!
But damn...people were having sex with these things...ugh
kevkhalee 2 years ago
really? i will have to read up on that, because when i read about the sumerians they only identified 6 planets, saturn being the last one.
maximusTLP 2 years ago
if you read sumerian mythology, the planet they call nibiru is actually the planet saturn. look up saturnus or the god saturnus and it will explain that maybe this planet is the key to our past.
maximusTLP 2 years ago
@maximusTLP Saturn is a gas giant. Its uninhabitable. Maybe a moon of Saturn, but otherwise nope.
Antisyzygy 11 months ago
@Antisyzygy yea i have read alot about all this b.s. over the past year , don't know what to believe, it seems that everyone has the answer with no evidence. planet nibiru could simply be mythology. I looked all over sumerian mythology, i see no mention of an alien race creating us. it seems like this guy is merely interpreting things in his own way. saturn has lots of occult symbolism, as above so below, besides that i have found nothing.
maximusTLP 11 months ago
@Antisyzygy there is only a theory that perhaps once saturn was closer to us at some point, no real evidence as far as i know. you really have to ask yourself, at the end of the day, does it matter? i say no, just live your life in peace and let positiveness cure our fears.
maximusTLP 11 months ago
@maximusTLP Saturn is a gas giant. It is absolutely massive compared to Earth and well, composed of gas, meaning it has no surface to walk upon and has pressures which would crush you into a sardine can. It would have similar properties if it was closer to the sun. Its been in its orbit for millions of years, which is longer than humans have been around by thousands of magnitudes. The evidence can be proven easily by mathematics.
Antisyzygy 11 months ago
@Antisyzygy like i said, really doesn't matter.
maximusTLP 11 months ago
If you read what the actual Sumerian documents say, you will see that that this guy is handing out nothing but dis-information. Intriguing, yes, but it's not true. The creation story told here has nothing to do with what the Sumerians really believed. His source is from Sitchin - who is widely discredited by many historians and even by myself after doing my own research.
artistnyk 2 years ago
If you just view it as "Theory" and not religion/belief. No harm done right? But I'm sure there's some people who would watch this and fly off the handle...
TyrannyStudios 2 years ago
Well, but you know what? Sitchin has been identified by David Icke and others as a disinformer, a misleader. When David talked to Sitchin about the reptilian symbolism in the ancient records, Sitchin warned him not to write about it. Watch, "The Reptilian Agenda."
worryphree 2 years ago
@worryphree So your gonna believe a trnascript between david icke and some dude who claims too see sitchin, and several other people shape shift into lizard people and talk about disinforming people?
I personally like david icke, but Sitchin is very well onformed, yeah he made errors in translating, but Sumerian is a dead language, try and find NYONE who can fully trnalsate it without error
Godsmack0Believe 1 year ago
=OoO=
Re:-Karnivorious on Nikolay Valuev.
I would agree...Clearly an extreme variation on the norm.
Clearly a Hybrid. Clearly ugly enough to make a freight train take a dirt road & also has the weirdest looking combo of a lack of & as well a semblance of a *Forehead*.
Had a Tatar grandfather, Once on a hunt not far from St. Petersburg, it is said Valuev wrestled & killed a wild boar using only his hands and teeth. (YIKES!!!).
=OoO=
Casmige 2 years ago
interesting
shaworld 3 years ago
im so glad you speak english
Ben1607 3 years ago
Sumaria is the birth place of civilisation...
The Ananuki are the true gods of man.
Makes more sense the the shit they spout in the bible or koran.
vman996 3 years ago
WATCH: ZEITGEIST its thw best explaination on religion, but you are right the Annunaki are creators
jawsk9 3 years ago
Amen to that, but I'm not putting all my eggs in one basket. Interesting though and provocative.
TyrannyStudios 2 years ago
As long as these scholars keep their focus in Mesopotamia/Sumer and out of the Nile valley (where this first cosmogony, script, and civilization really originate)- they will be on a wild goose chase. (Which may be a good thing)
RudeBoy170 3 years ago