Haha British cars.. I'd choose german and japanese all the way, Lotus isn't all that bad though but still british can never make a fun FWD car anyway so yeah..
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
They talk about the Blue Motion - good, but then why aren't all the Golfs (and Polo's and Passats) fitted with these specially eco friendly features? Apart from the GTI, and Passat R36?
People complain that people like TopGear quite an awful lot, and that they are completely unrealistic only testing overly priced cars. Yes, maybe, but they're far more interesting. When they test reasonably priced cars, they do things like try and drive them while sitting in the back. It's TopGear's JOB to be the most interesting show, and so is FifthGear. FifthGear, well, we're all right, just isn't as interesting.
Fifth gear is shockingly awful compared to Top gear. Firstly Fifth gear fail at being funny and secondly their presenters are crap. However one advantage of Fifth Gear over Top Gear is that they review 'affordable' cars, something which top gear lacks, but hey top gear wouldn't be as funny if they reviewed cars like protons or daewoo's!
@ross0tube fifth gear is real automotive journalism, top gear is just a comedy program thats staged and acted, FG is not intended to be funny, its intended to be informative, FG is intended for a more mature automotive enthusiast, TG is intended for all audiences and its focused on the anecdotes and fake stories of its presenters.
if your a real enthusiast or just interested in cars youll like FG, if your a childish enthusiast or just interested in watching something "funny" youll like TG.
@gggromay yeah, but what sucks is that FG try to make it seem funny or make non-funny jokes which are funny! thats what Jeremy Clarkson does, he knows how to make us interested and make us laugh, fg try to and fail! so just FG, give us info and goodbye all bad jokes ;-)
@gggromay FG is informative because they are just not funny...If you are a real enthusiast you will understand TG reviews.FG gives you all the boring information,TG gives you only the one you need...
Haha British cars.. I'd choose german and japanese all the way, Lotus isn't all that bad though but still british can never make a fun FWD car anyway so yeah..
Dimitri0809 3 months ago
BlueMotion pssshhh next thing is it will only be available to vegetarians...
W4TCH4W 4 months ago
No offence, but Top Gear was clearly titled with the future in mind.. Considering more and more cars have a SIXTH gear nowadays...
M0D3R8A 9 months ago
VW golf is still the benchmark for all hatchbacks
wazazone 9 months ago 3
@wazazone
Honda is way better imo.
Dimitri0809 3 months ago
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
miaoxuebeijing 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
miaoxuebeijing 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
miaoxuebeijing 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dimitri0809 Yes. I agree. VW's quality has been less than exceptional. My sister's Golf 6 had a bad tail light in just 2 weeks (less than 200 km). Small issue but reflects the overall quality. Her old POLO 2004's water bump went out at 50K km.
miaoxuebeijing 1 month ago
VW Golf V Stil RULES!!!
chain1989 10 months ago 2
I hate 3G! It took me 15 mins to load this stupid 5 min video!
sssukaPSN 11 months ago
They talk about the Blue Motion - good, but then why aren't all the Golfs (and Polo's and Passats) fitted with these specially eco friendly features? Apart from the GTI, and Passat R36?
AndersO1983 11 months ago
where's Mr.Clarkson?
AbRWillSuper 11 months ago
Comment removed
EnvyProjekt 1 year ago
both shows are very good, and supported in the same way, the presenters even know each other!
unrealharry 1 year ago 2
Top Gear=More interesting
Fifth Gear=More practical
AudiABTr8 1 year ago 77
@AudiABTr8 I watch them both!
stoeptegel50 11 months ago
People complain that people like TopGear quite an awful lot, and that they are completely unrealistic only testing overly priced cars. Yes, maybe, but they're far more interesting. When they test reasonably priced cars, they do things like try and drive them while sitting in the back. It's TopGear's JOB to be the most interesting show, and so is FifthGear. FifthGear, well, we're all right, just isn't as interesting.
epluribusunum0 1 year ago
No I really don't want to spend time in a car with you
zeonbub 2 years ago
What bloody car reviewer compares cars to ciabattas, crumpets, egg boxes and loaf's of bread!
ross0tube 2 years ago 2
@ross0tube its a metafor, he uses it just for example u twat, read a book penishead
Familjajote 1 year ago
Fifth gear is shockingly awful compared to Top gear. Firstly Fifth gear fail at being funny and secondly their presenters are crap. However one advantage of Fifth Gear over Top Gear is that they review 'affordable' cars, something which top gear lacks, but hey top gear wouldn't be as funny if they reviewed cars like protons or daewoo's!
ross0tube 2 years ago 4
@ross0tube fifth gear is real automotive journalism, top gear is just a comedy program thats staged and acted, FG is not intended to be funny, its intended to be informative, FG is intended for a more mature automotive enthusiast, TG is intended for all audiences and its focused on the anecdotes and fake stories of its presenters.
if your a real enthusiast or just interested in cars youll like FG, if your a childish enthusiast or just interested in watching something "funny" youll like TG.
gggromay 1 year ago 12
@gggromay
and if you're a car enthusiast full-stop.. you love both
dre32pitt 9 months ago 8
@gggromay yeah, but what sucks is that FG try to make it seem funny or make non-funny jokes which are funny! thats what Jeremy Clarkson does, he knows how to make us interested and make us laugh, fg try to and fail! so just FG, give us info and goodbye all bad jokes ;-)
Mishomtp 7 months ago
@gggromay you must be a very boring person.
mauwiewauwieeeee 4 months ago
@gggromay FG is informative because they are just not funny...If you are a real enthusiast you will understand TG reviews.FG gives you all the boring information,TG gives you only the one you need...
Vatabg 2 months ago
@gggromay and if you ever plan on getting laid I hope you don't talk to girls like that mister plod :S
aconroy8 3 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This bloke is an absolute idiot honestly, his GTI review was obvious hate of brand, and false info.
TheMegaCONARTIST 2 years ago