theres a big difference when roddick beat federer in 2003 toronto and this. federer beat himself on this one, he made like 6 unforced errors just in the two games on this video. In 2003, Roddick actually beat Federer straight up. I wish that andy would come back.
to all the people that didnt know, roger had mono at the time of this match he lost alot of weight due to his sickness, just goes to show you the difference between roddick on his game and federer off his game, roddick can barely beat him
Roddick's problem has always been his rather one-dimensional game. He's improved a lot on adding more depth and variety to his repertoire but it still pales in comparison to Federer and probably always will. Nadal too started off very one-dimensional, he recognized and admitted this very early on and worked his ass off to add more aspects to his game.
I was so angry when he lost to davydenko in the next round after working so hard to beat roger, it wouldve great to see him win a tournament in which he beat federer, that hasnt happened in 7 yrs unfortunately.
If Federer "just didn't care about this tournament" then why did he win the second set (6-4) and gave a really close match? He would've just played lazily and let Roddick win all three.
Great win. I think he's playing the best tennis of his life right now, and I really think he will win another slam. He was heartbreakingly close at Wimbledon.
Roddick looked utterly drained emotionally after this one, he lost for the first time in his career against Davydenko in the very next match in the semis but I think this victory meant more for him than the title
Babolat should make midsize racquets. Roddick would beat Federer more often. Midplus racquets lack control that's why Sampras and Federer use midsize!!
@thisislaser "2 hand backhand is for ball pushers who want to run all day"?
loll, people use 2 handed backhand for more strength/power. and there are some players who are mad fast with 2 handed backhand so they don't use that much energy.
in fact, in any case, strength really has nothing to do with it. tennis is mostly about positioning.
@misterlonely1446 midplus tennis racquets are built for the purpose of ball pushing. Midsize racquets are for ball strikers who want to win. control is everything ball pushing is evil.
@splendid1000 Nadal has improved his game and won the US open, but he still has to run a lot. He's also left handed, if he wasn't he'd never win with that style. He has to wear down opponents because he can't hit clean winners.
You can tell this took a LOT outta Andy. It would have been so fun to see him play Nadal for the title... It seemed Andy put everything he had into beating Roger and he didn't have enough reserves to play the rest of the tournament.
i think his time to win a gnother grand slam is soon based on wimbleton. He was more desrving than fed to win in my opinion. But if he keeps at it he wil win
All I think about regarding this match was how Roddick followed this up by losing to Davydenko in the very next round; a guy he was 5-0 against at the time!
Roddick sure played excellent in the Wimby final. He could have had it if he kept it together in the 2nd set. His couch has done excellent, but needs to work on Andy's mental game, definitely.
he's always mentally strong now. if he wasnt he would not have made it 7-6, 3-6, 14-16 after what everyone calls a choke in the 2nd set. he made it despairingly close. that showed how mentally tough he is
Good point. Yeah, after that 2nd set it must have been hard to get it together. But you could really tell during some points throughout that match that he cracked under pressure...you don't really see any of that from Federer .. . so there's a difference.
I agree, but I think he has trouble when he's close to winning. It's almost like he doesn't believe he can beat Federer. He's a master of staying in a match after defeat, and when it looks like he's not doing well, but when he's a couple shots away from winning, (against Federer, at least) he can't hold it together.
i love watching tennis because no matter who you root for, you can always get along with other fans and its so easy to like any player. its a shame if you talk crap on players
His coach has done fine, roddick could not of done better really, he should of won and i really wanted him to, but it was his fault in the 2nd set he has 4 set points
Andy Roddick deserved and needed this win big time. all those loses since he beat Federer in Canada in 2003 just had to weigh on him. i can think of at least 2 other matches between them that Roddick should've won.
nadal,murray,roddick are d only players capable of beating federer at wimbledon, , ,i wud hav put djokavic in der but his injuries always let him down. . .
root who you want for, i dont care, i just hate it when people say 'i like federer and nadal because there the best'. It's ok if you just like watching them play and they have that something that appeals to you.
Was that his wife, brooklyn decker?
datzvietxnxmze13 1 month ago
theres a big difference when roddick beat federer in 2003 toronto and this. federer beat himself on this one, he made like 6 unforced errors just in the two games on this video. In 2003, Roddick actually beat Federer straight up. I wish that andy would come back.
AustinCrawford1 1 month ago
Roddick is so happy he beat Federer while he had Mono. lol. It's still a win, so good for him.
4Ventus 2 months ago
Big deal, Roger had mono at the time, and Andy lost to shitty Davidenko in the next round.
izm64 2 months ago
The antidote against poison!
Rus6ATP 2 months ago
to all the people that didnt know, roger had mono at the time of this match he lost alot of weight due to his sickness, just goes to show you the difference between roddick on his game and federer off his game, roddick can barely beat him
abcjc1 5 months ago
i bet the whole time he was serving for the match his camp was thinking "how is he going to fuck up another match point"
JayK1225 5 months ago
andy roddick is a very good, but hes a poor returner of serve now. hes days are gone just like hewitt
rashy123456 7 months ago
Andy Proposed to Brooklyn earlier this same day! so cute!!!
dntforgetme 7 months ago
@dntforgetme Really?
mrlufernandovc 3 months ago
lol took him enough years to do this...
hattrickster33 8 months ago
@hattrickster33 beat him in 2003 toronto. yes 5 years to do it AGAIN
cj397 7 months ago
@cj397 yea he pretty much has to play his best tennis +10% to even stand a chance
hattrickster33 6 months ago
Brooklyn was happy for her hubby beating federer. :))
TheCloud0999 10 months ago
In Miami Roddick makes miracles....
LINAZAS 11 months ago
Big deal, he beat him in a best of three sets. Beat him in a best of five at a slam. Not happening.
AmericanIdiotTN4 11 months ago
Roddick's problem has always been his rather one-dimensional game. He's improved a lot on adding more depth and variety to his repertoire but it still pales in comparison to Federer and probably always will. Nadal too started off very one-dimensional, he recognized and admitted this very early on and worked his ass off to add more aspects to his game.
Swordsman808 1 year ago
GO RODDICK!
TheHAMMER77777 1 year ago
I love the reaction of Andy. he doesn't know how to react :D
Minkki82 1 year ago
inner andy says..
why now and not back in the wimbledon final ? xD damn it!!!!!!!!
ricochetlaugh 1 year ago
@ricochetlaugh haha
ismac123 1 year ago
@ricochetlaugh
lol this was before the 2009 wimbledon final
1996913 10 months ago
this is reaaaaally sweet to see
lanceloter 1 year ago
I was so angry when he lost to davydenko in the next round after working so hard to beat roger, it wouldve great to see him win a tournament in which he beat federer, that hasnt happened in 7 yrs unfortunately.
Currymastuh 1 year ago
me too
lanceloter 1 year ago
this is when roger was sick(illness), 2008 was a down year for him
abcjc1 1 year ago
federer was being shankerer here. disgusting match.
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
If Federer "just didn't care about this tournament" then why did he win the second set (6-4) and gave a really close match? He would've just played lazily and let Roddick win all three.
aznking01010 1 year ago
Great win. I think he's playing the best tennis of his life right now, and I really think he will win another slam. He was heartbreakingly close at Wimbledon.
tuckatangent 1 year ago 2
Good win.
IKnowWereYouSleep 1 year ago
I was so happy when Andy won this match, he served better than ever. Congrats A-Rod winning Miami 2010 ;-)
ARoddick1985 1 year ago
Fed would never let roddick beat him u stupid retard. But it's funny cuz fed hates this tourny. But ya roddick finally beat him lol
TheAgassi21 1 year ago
@TheAgassi21 federer only tried like 1% in that 3rd set lol and still managed 3 games at 3-6.
BrotherTree1 1 year ago
Roddick looked utterly drained emotionally after this one, he lost for the first time in his career against Davydenko in the very next match in the semis but I think this victory meant more for him than the title
andrewblastoff 1 year ago
Babolat should make midsize racquets. Roddick would beat Federer more often. Midplus racquets lack control that's why Sampras and Federer use midsize!!
thisislaser 2 years ago
wtf you know nothing about tennis if roddick would play better with midsize rackets he would play this rackets but he play diffrent than federer
dmx19999994 1 year ago
Also 2 hand backhands suck. Everyone must change to one handed backhand now!!
thisislaser 1 year ago
@thisislaser Why/
XHiddenCyberX 1 year ago
@XHiddenCyberX You have more reach with a onehand backhand. 2 hand backhand is for ball pushers who want to run all day.
thisislaser 1 year ago
@thisislaser two handed backhands are for ball pushers?? rofl ya right
Flareknife 1 year ago
@thisislaser "2 hand backhand is for ball pushers who want to run all day"?
loll, people use 2 handed backhand for more strength/power. and there are some players who are mad fast with 2 handed backhand so they don't use that much energy.
in fact, in any case, strength really has nothing to do with it. tennis is mostly about positioning.
misterlonely1446 1 year ago
@misterlonely1446 midplus tennis racquets are built for the purpose of ball pushing. Midsize racquets are for ball strikers who want to win. control is everything ball pushing is evil.
thisislaser 1 year ago
@thisislaser
Nadal would beg to differ
splendid1000 1 year ago
@splendid1000 Nadal has improved his game and won the US open, but he still has to run a lot. He's also left handed, if he wasn't he'd never win with that style. He has to wear down opponents because he can't hit clean winners.
thisislaser 1 year ago
damn....its too bad that federer exists...roddick would have won soo many more grand slams.
uNiteDStaTesofPOP 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its Ok, Fed made him suffer again at Wimbledon final following year :D
Mirren81 2 years ago
woah what a rare moment in history.. Roddick beat Federer???
xxx0ox0 2 years ago 3
You can tell this took a LOT outta Andy. It would have been so fun to see him play Nadal for the title... It seemed Andy put everything he had into beating Roger and he didn't have enough reserves to play the rest of the tournament.
Galactic123 2 years ago
Andy did beat nadal at a tournament a a month or two earlier
cj397 2 years ago 2
i think his time to win a gnother grand slam is soon based on wimbleton. He was more desrving than fed to win in my opinion. But if he keeps at it he wil win
paulxtreme 2 years ago 19
@paulxtreme lol
atavisticinhere 1 year ago
@atavisticinhere he will win 1 more slam i know tony roach and a few coaches he is still mentally staken after 2009
paulxtreme 1 year ago
oh i wish if i had watched this on live .. it seems that it was a great match ..
and i like how the crowd was so excited and exciting !
stillalive1231 2 years ago
federer took off after he lost, he only cries in front of people if he loses/wins a final
skateboardbassplayer 2 years ago 5
All I think about regarding this match was how Roddick followed this up by losing to Davydenko in the very next round; a guy he was 5-0 against at the time!
baronvg 2 years ago
en ingles por favor.
lostalex77 2 years ago
Roddick sure played excellent in the Wimby final. He could have had it if he kept it together in the 2nd set. His couch has done excellent, but needs to work on Andy's mental game, definitely.
U2kie 2 years ago 6
he's always mentally strong now. if he wasnt he would not have made it 7-6, 3-6, 14-16 after what everyone calls a choke in the 2nd set. he made it despairingly close. that showed how mentally tough he is
Deadeye287 2 years ago 14
Good point. Yeah, after that 2nd set it must have been hard to get it together. But you could really tell during some points throughout that match that he cracked under pressure...you don't really see any of that from Federer .. . so there's a difference.
U2kie 2 years ago 2
I agree, but I think he has trouble when he's close to winning. It's almost like he doesn't believe he can beat Federer. He's a master of staying in a match after defeat, and when it looks like he's not doing well, but when he's a couple shots away from winning, (against Federer, at least) he can't hold it together.
That being said, I'm a huge Roddick fan.
someleetguy 2 years ago
i love watching tennis because no matter who you root for, you can always get along with other fans and its so easy to like any player. its a shame if you talk crap on players
element754 2 years ago 3
is this court US OPEN
twinterrors44 2 years ago
Sony Ericsson open
Frostythelol 2 years ago
Roddick did good wimbledon he shouldve won
Oblivassassin10 2 years ago 2
and Federer is the King of the Kings (-;
SonicLeRebelle 2 years ago
ano, but its nice to go for the underdog sometimes (:
Linfiled09 2 years ago
nadal is the baseline king and roddick
serve king lol
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
His coach has done fine, roddick could not of done better really, he should of won and i really wanted him to, but it was his fault in the 2nd set he has 4 set points
Strikerking8 2 years ago 2
yup like uhhh larry!!!!
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
andy roddick stupid assshole 7-5 6-7 6-7
6-3 14-16 in the third set when it stands
6-2 in the tiebreak he has played served
volley
gewooneerlijk 2 years ago
Andy Roddick deserved and needed this win big time. all those loses since he beat Federer in Canada in 2003 just had to weigh on him. i can think of at least 2 other matches between them that Roddick should've won.
chupacabra012 2 years ago 2
nadal,murray,roddick are d only players capable of beating federer at wimbledon, , ,i wud hav put djokavic in der but his injuries always let him down. . .
partyboy4life1986 2 years ago
still roger ownz roddick everybody knows that :D go roger!!!
Zeppelin1994fan 2 years ago
but u have to admit roddick has improved
liampimp12341234 2 years ago 2
i actually hate federer fans. they only support him because he wins
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago 4
what a bullshit, Federer is just the best tennisplayer when it comes down to technique. and he has the craziest plays ever
Wtmrschn 2 years ago 2
ok, i'll rephras it again
people root for federer because he's the best. admit it.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago
so ill root 4 the worst then...o.O
fluid1992 2 years ago
root who you want for, i dont care, i just hate it when people say 'i like federer and nadal because there the best'. It's ok if you just like watching them play and they have that something that appeals to you.
EscapedC0nvict 2 years ago
Very true nowadays. But I have to admit Federer works hard. I'm a Roddick fan myself
Andywantscandy24 2 years ago
Or because there are swiss people in the world...
alwaysskate 2 years ago
Lol a little less crappy
PassionNTennis 2 years ago
Roddick relies too much on his serve..dats why he does not win against the tope players anymore...
anthony0126 3 years ago
well of course his game isnt that strong anymore...but he beat federer, nadal and djokovic last year!
11Capitano 3 years ago 3
djokovic was easy this year. "AAAAHHH I'M BURNING TOO MUCH HEAT AAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!"
perconteluz 2 years ago 6
You are a dumbass.
RobT89 2 years ago
i'm a dumbass? wow... i bet u dont know shit bout tennis
perconteluz 2 years ago
Great match from Andy, Roger was playing very well until that last game.
kataisa3 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Federer needs to use a bigger head size tennis racquet.
quest8899 3 years ago
LOL @ the old guy on the right at 3:32. his laugh looks so evil
ROFL
seyoum85 3 years ago
loooooooooooooooooooooooooool
kalafeh 3 years ago
JAAJAJJAAJAJAJJAJA
is true!!!!
he is a demmon
joelguzzetti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don;t like Andy. Roger should have won.
Lets go Roger Federer!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nepatriots77 3 years ago
Haha.. great stuff.. :D
ASpancake 3 years ago
it's actually 2 for 17.
Etownmu 3 years ago
lol
joelguzzetti 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fed lost. Andy did not win. Nuff said.
CleckleysProof 3 years ago