@1983rafan Cannot be compared. Today there are more than 70 players in the world that could beat Fischer. Chess has developed a lot since the coming of the computer. Kasparov is a whole different category than Fischer, he would beat him every time because Fischer wouldn't have any useful reply to anything.
@SuperSmilingSmiley I disagree people adapt, and people blunder. Fischer would win on occasion even if Kasparov was the stronger player. Furthermore, you need to look at people's skills for the time period they are in. They can only push the game so much from their starting information, the next generation of geniuses can push it farther because they start way ahead with all the new information.
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
Fischer is undoubtedly the best and most accomplished American player of all time. However, I have my doubts that he would've been able to defeat either Karpov (and he certainly would not have defeated Kasparov) even in his prime.
@Reshik33 I'm not Kasparov or Karpov, and I don't have goals or ambitions like those of Kasparov or Karpov. Realize that the rule you just stated does not apply to me, when I'm on youtube commenting on who was better historically speaking - _ -
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD dude stop dissin' fischer..=) guy was 20 years ahead of his time..he knew everything that was writen in chess books in his time.If he lived in era of garry he would have had exactly same theoretical knowledge and since they are both calculating geniouses(190+ IQ) that means they are pretty much same strenght..
@was1swill I'm dissing Fischer? Wow, my bad, I apologize if ranking a player #2 or 3 all-time is a diss.
Kasparov reached a rating of 2851 at his peak. There's not much argument, amongst either professionals or amateurs, that that qualifies him as the best player of all time (ahead of Fischer).
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD i actually think Karpov could have beat Fischer because of his pure positional play. Kasparov vs Fischer would have been amazing though
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD With all respect for Fischer, but he wasn't at the same level as Karpov. Also he didn't have the help of 10s of strong grandmasters, nor the resources as Karpov got from the Kremlin!
@Phyle9 There's not much doubt in my mind Karpov would've beaten Fischer when they were due to play for the World Championship in 1975. You gotta keep in mind that Fischer had basically disappeared, and presumably stopped playing chess for THREE YEARS after he won it all in 1972.
No matter how good you are a 3-year absence is going to set you back significantly. And Karpov was already an extremely strong player to begin with. It's the same story with Kasparov.
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD Yeah, Fischer was good. And i mean REALLY good! But not as good as the American media hyped him, like he was the number 1 chess god of all time ;-)
They just bombarded him as a moviestar. He wasn't as good as the russians, and that's why he didn't play in 1975. He was mainly afraid of himself (as Karpov stated in an interview) cause he thought worldchampions weren't allowed to lose a single game. Which is of course unrealistic in chess. He also knew how strong Karpov was....
@Phyle9 Yes, there is a noticeable difference in perception of Fischer in the US compared to elsewhere. B/c of the American media, to the amateur public, Fischer was an invincible chess god. And somehow his "disappearance" just added to his mystique. To the rest of the world, he was prodigious, brilliant, visionary, and all that, but he was by no means invincible or even the best ever. There is a difference between a man who defends his title for 2 decades (Kasp.) and one who doesn't at all.
it is true that Spassky played with a psychological disadvantage - I will not deny that.
Fischer blundered horribly in game 1 and forfeited game 2 by default. So.. well.. Actually I don't care that much - it just struck me that you don't believe in Fischer's genius.
I have done extensive analysis of the games. Your capital letters does not change my opinion.
My guess is that you are some kind of russian nationalist and therefore needs to believe in Spasskys superiority.
It is true, however, that Spassky could have won the match - by declining Fischers absurd demands. But that is the only way he could have won. I'm sorry, but you stand alone with your opinion. Everyone (including Gazza) thinks that Bobby was 'towering over the competition' (Gazza's words).
I dig what you are saying, but I have to say that Spassky wasn't 'Blundering his games away' - he was crushed by a superior player. There is reason to criticize Fischer - but his brilliance is undeniable.
texaspete...'some who will remain nameless, like fischer for example'???? you are aware of what bollocks that is arent u? hardly remaining nameless to be named in the same sentence is it
Gary is class, a gentleman champion, role model & patron of the game > on and off the board - unlike some other people who shall remain nameless like bobby fischer for example.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah he sucks, Set up to destroy Fischers name, stole his glory, and Garry you cheated for the number 1 highest ratting, you piece of shit. yeah how could Garry be the best if his ratting was 2nd. so fuck you Russian cheats poor losers. u act like a little baby when you play chess
i would love to had seen kasparov vs fisher
tavogp 4 weeks ago
1.-KASPAROV
2.-FISHER
3.-LASKER
4.-KARPOV
booris31 5 months ago
FISCHER - CAPABLANCA - ALEKHINE
AXEL77ism 5 months ago
Fischer
Kasparov
Morphy
roulleteman7 9 months ago
@1983rafan Cannot be compared. Today there are more than 70 players in the world that could beat Fischer. Chess has developed a lot since the coming of the computer. Kasparov is a whole different category than Fischer, he would beat him every time because Fischer wouldn't have any useful reply to anything.
SuperSmilingSmiley 10 months ago
@SuperSmilingSmiley I disagree people adapt, and people blunder. Fischer would win on occasion even if Kasparov was the stronger player. Furthermore, you need to look at people's skills for the time period they are in. They can only push the game so much from their starting information, the next generation of geniuses can push it farther because they start way ahead with all the new information.
jilow 3 weeks ago
i was already to like it and add it to favorites if the band cake was the music track
tubertomp 10 months ago
1. Kasparov
2. Fischer
3. Karpov
NewVahan2 1 year ago
great song for the greatest of all times
x6801 1 year ago
Fischer did it by himself, he even locked out his seconds when a game had been halted for a night.
He founded modern chess and Garry was his first real follower.
Karpov had superior talent.
gorantrevise 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the past our teachers were always the grandmasters and worldchampions, nowadays our teachers are the computers. They play , solve and compose . So have a look at youtube.com :
/watch?v=mwYQRteeHbE
Moremover 1 year ago
kasparov is great chess player but karpov is the best he is a chess legend
rusia0071 1 year ago
Fischer is undoubtedly the best and most accomplished American player of all time. However, I have my doubts that he would've been able to defeat either Karpov (and he certainly would not have defeated Kasparov) even in his prime.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
Well well now, you've already broken the very first rule:
Never underestimate your opponent.
Reshik33 1 year ago
@Reshik33 I'm not Kasparov or Karpov, and I don't have goals or ambitions like those of Kasparov or Karpov. Realize that the rule you just stated does not apply to me, when I'm on youtube commenting on who was better historically speaking - _ -
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD dude stop dissin' fischer..=) guy was 20 years ahead of his time..he knew everything that was writen in chess books in his time.If he lived in era of garry he would have had exactly same theoretical knowledge and since they are both calculating geniouses(190+ IQ) that means they are pretty much same strenght..
was1swill 1 year ago
@was1swill I'm dissing Fischer? Wow, my bad, I apologize if ranking a player #2 or 3 all-time is a diss.
Kasparov reached a rating of 2851 at his peak. There's not much argument, amongst either professionals or amateurs, that that qualifies him as the best player of all time (ahead of Fischer).
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD i actually think Karpov could have beat Fischer because of his pure positional play. Kasparov vs Fischer would have been amazing though
KnightedMagi 1 year ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD With all respect for Fischer, but he wasn't at the same level as Karpov. Also he didn't have the help of 10s of strong grandmasters, nor the resources as Karpov got from the Kremlin!
Phyle9 1 year ago
@Phyle9 There's not much doubt in my mind Karpov would've beaten Fischer when they were due to play for the World Championship in 1975. You gotta keep in mind that Fischer had basically disappeared, and presumably stopped playing chess for THREE YEARS after he won it all in 1972.
No matter how good you are a 3-year absence is going to set you back significantly. And Karpov was already an extremely strong player to begin with. It's the same story with Kasparov.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
@PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD Yeah, Fischer was good. And i mean REALLY good! But not as good as the American media hyped him, like he was the number 1 chess god of all time ;-)
They just bombarded him as a moviestar. He wasn't as good as the russians, and that's why he didn't play in 1975. He was mainly afraid of himself (as Karpov stated in an interview) cause he thought worldchampions weren't allowed to lose a single game. Which is of course unrealistic in chess. He also knew how strong Karpov was....
Phyle9 1 year ago
@Phyle9 Yes, there is a noticeable difference in perception of Fischer in the US compared to elsewhere. B/c of the American media, to the amateur public, Fischer was an invincible chess god. And somehow his "disappearance" just added to his mystique. To the rest of the world, he was prodigious, brilliant, visionary, and all that, but he was by no means invincible or even the best ever. There is a difference between a man who defends his title for 2 decades (Kasp.) and one who doesn't at all.
PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 1 year ago
Bl4ckR0ck@ You are definitely right about the third game of 1972 match as it was dead stalemate before Spasskies last move.
Faramarzrastin 1 year ago
Your political opinion does not interest me at all. I'm here for the chess.
Ruxistico 1 year ago
it is true that Spassky played with a psychological disadvantage - I will not deny that.
Fischer blundered horribly in game 1 and forfeited game 2 by default. So.. well.. Actually I don't care that much - it just struck me that you don't believe in Fischer's genius.
Ruxistico 1 year ago
I have done extensive analysis of the games. Your capital letters does not change my opinion.
My guess is that you are some kind of russian nationalist and therefore needs to believe in Spasskys superiority.
It is true, however, that Spassky could have won the match - by declining Fischers absurd demands. But that is the only way he could have won. I'm sorry, but you stand alone with your opinion. Everyone (including Gazza) thinks that Bobby was 'towering over the competition' (Gazza's words).
Ruxistico 1 year ago
I dig what you are saying, but I have to say that Spassky wasn't 'Blundering his games away' - he was crushed by a superior player. There is reason to criticize Fischer - but his brilliance is undeniable.
Ruxistico 1 year ago
I need to know the name of the song that accompany this video. Plz can any1 tell me?
Ruxistico 1 year ago
It is Rocky Movie OSD, i don't exactly remember which sequel, but i would bet IV.
auretd 1 year ago
thank you. I now know that it is called 'Going The Distance' and that it is composed by Bill Conti.
Ruxistico 1 year ago
is Kasparov the russian of Gaspar or Casper...?
IkiriRiri 2 years ago
texaspete...'some who will remain nameless, like fischer for example'???? you are aware of what bollocks that is arent u? hardly remaining nameless to be named in the same sentence is it
bigshot1973 2 years ago
para poly kalo,para poly kalo para poly kalo alla enas htan o champion paul morphy
arvas3 2 years ago
Gary is class, a gentleman champion, role model & patron of the game > on and off the board - unlike some other people who shall remain nameless like bobby fischer for example.
texaspete66 2 years ago
Fischer was the best, but even if Garry was better, there will always be an asterisk next to his name in the history books.
DBSwofford 2 years ago
I just finished reading his autobiography ("Unlimited Challenge").
Amazing story.
fatesofgreedom 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah he sucks, Set up to destroy Fischers name, stole his glory, and Garry you cheated for the number 1 highest ratting, you piece of shit. yeah how could Garry be the best if his ratting was 2nd. so fuck you Russian cheats poor losers. u act like a little baby when you play chess
dracotheslydrago 2 years ago
You show proof or you apologize.
Haltung 2 years ago 6
How did garry cheat for The number 1 rating?
VikingII 2 years ago
do you know what game chess is? probably never even saw a game in your life. Go back to maximum security prison loser
hamtuckey 2 years ago
αψογο βίντεο!μπράβο!
alekageorg 3 years ago