ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket. i must say unlucky india
ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket.
Im confused... how on earth would this be a safe? The bail was struck of by the fielder when the batsman was not past the line. And just putting this out, Go Australia :)
lol, it's funny cause at 0:12 you can clearly see the bails leaving the stumps before the ball is anywhere near it... he didn't uproot a stump after he kicked the bails off, therefore it's not out, lucky break for the pakis, tough luck for the indians
The right decision would be not out. The wicket was broken before the ball in hand got there. In that circumstance the wicket is considered down. To effect a run out thereafter a stump needs to be removed from the ground. This is clearly stated in the laws of teh game.
As no stumps were removed the wicket was broken illegally before the ball so not out is the right decision.
From an unbiased Australian perspective, that certainly looked out to me... However, the benefit of the doubt MUST go to the batsman, so you can all stop complaining. When a decision is even a 1% uncertainty, then the batsman is Not Out. Hence, I am okay with the decision. Read the rulebook!
Pause at around 0:12 and look veeeeeery carefully. Though you cannot see the foot, the bail is clearly dislodged BEFORE the fielder hits the stump with the ball. Unfortunate, but "not out" is indeed the correct decision.
Just Now I watch this Video. Its NOT OUT. As per cricket rule, once the bills are jumped from the stumps, the next action stumps should be fell down to the ground. then only its approveed a wicket. Here stumps are still alive. So, its not out. I am an Indian. Whatever it is india is won the match.. I am Happy
i m relly sorry to say that it is NOT OUT !! i am a neutral not with Pak and not even with INDIA but i noticed the stumps were uprotten by the foot first!! u can clearly see that!! so the hands with ball not broke the stumps , it is not out!! i might be wrong but as the angle is around 40-45 so i cant make a good decision. however not out it is !!
If one bail is off, it shall be sufficient for the purpose of putting the wicket down to remove the remaining bail, or to strike or pull any of the three stumps out of the ground.
What isn't clear from this video is the state of both bails. one has clearly been dislodged - but what about the other ? - if it was intact he is out - if not he is not out.
@Robafest: Please provide us with the law that states that it's out if the bails are dislodged by the ball and feet at the same time. I can't seem to find that!
Lol im aussie so dont get into ANOTHER india v pakistan thing here, but truthfully, it wasn't out, he took the bails off with his foot PRIOR to his hand with ball in it, so, no, it wasnt out
I know nothing of the particular match, but I think this should have been given not out, the stumps broken by anything but the ball or ball carrying hand then need to be uprooted for a runout. The angle is not perfect but it looks like the foot is what breaks the stumps. At around 48 seconds you can see a stump past the fielders but the hands are not knocking it out of place, they arrive later.
It was out If wicket stump would have uprooted.Bcoz it is very clear that stumps were already hit by his leg before he hit his hands.It is just my opinion.
look at th pace there bro.good shree u bowl ur heart out .keep on bowling quick & aggressive.....................kick all candy ass in the field.........
NOT OUT... watch again Sreesanth's own foot broke the stumps watch between 0:12-0:13 bails are off still his hand did not touch the wicket. But his foot hits the middle stump... which not visible at that time but visible at watch 0:17-0:22. It was good decision NOT OUT :)
In the event that a player accidentally removed the bails from the stumps without using the ball or a hand holding the ball then he is required to remove a stump from the ground whilst holding the ball. Technically this should have been given not out. Given the nature of how far the player was from his crease, however, he probably shouldn't have been given not out anyway although the possibility that the Indian player was attempting to cheat should not be ignored.
Not out. Clearly not out. The bale is not going in the way it should be if it was disturbed by the fielder's hand with the ball. Bale is going to left, rather than up or right or even towards the camera.
rule says that if u have the ball in ur hand then u can knock the bails from any part of ur body....it doesn't matter.....just that the u shud be touching the ball!!! when a wicketkeeper does a run out or stumping then does he touches the ball to the stump?? !!?? no......bcoz the ball stays on his gloves and doesn't come in contact with the stump !!! once jhonty rhodes jumped on the stumps (his whole body was involved) to run out a batsmen
You are incorrect. Read Law 28 - 1.(v), which clearly states the wicket has to be broken by the hand, or arm of the hand, which is holding the ball (either arm can break the wicket if the ball is held in both hands together). By the way, what decision did the umpire give, because it seems Sreesanth broke the wicket with his foot (12 seconds). DId he give him out?
that wasn't out, he hit the stumps with his foot, dislodged the bails, than hit the stumps with the ball, quite lucky that the indian players covered Taufel's view.
yup....he is out for sure.....even though the bails r off the stumps b4 the actual ball contact, he did uproot them.... thr r many cases previously of bails dropping and then batsman getting run out being uprooted.......please know your game b4 posting here.......it misleads people
ididnt see this match and i hate both of these teams but when sreesanths hands get to the stumps the bails are in the air. he mustve stepped on the stumps first cos the bails are in the air already when his hands touch the stumps. i dont even know what the rule is when that happens but u can clearly see that is what happens
i would just like to point out that if the bails are knocked off by a player its not out, the only way this could be out is if he were to pull out the stump or for atleast 1 bail to still be in contact with the wickets.
Not out unfortunately - broke up the stumps and therefore flew the bails with his foot before his hands got there. I mean practically it should be out, but technically, it is not.
The ball MUST be there at the moment of impact and the bails coming off. Sure, he had full control of the ball, brought his hands to where the wicket was with the ball & the batsman was way out of the crease - but on the technically it should not be out - which kinda sucks really! So get a big black dog up ya :-)
guys it's not out ok.... robafest... shhh your wrong, the real rules say if the bails are broken before before the the run out happends the feilder must remove the stump from the groud with the ball in his hands...... so there ya go
thats not out look at frames 12 and before...the stumps were broken before the fielder with the ball hit the wicket..seems the stumps were knocked by the other fielder
fuck u pakis for evaluating the defeat at the hands of indians..even if sreeshanth used his dick to dislodge the bails, thats still his fuckin dick and not urs....he fuckin dislodged you out of the tournament..so stop crying and let misbah practice harder to perfect the scoop shot...lol
Don't really care, but its obvious at 0:11 that the stumps break before the ball makes contact, seemingly from the foot of the player. They had to pull the stump out to get this run out.
the description of the video misses the point of the argument. This has nothing to do with Uthappa's legs at all, He didnt even touch the stumps. Its the fact that sreesanth uprooted the bails with his foot before the ball hit the stumps, so he must now remove a stump completely which he didnt. If this is out, then you could hold a ball in your hand and kick the stumps with your legs, which is not allowed.
u say Tafel had a good look? at 0.47/8 the indinan players have blurrred his view of the stumps and to Robafest tryngstate the rulesof stump breaking.
The MCC handbook on the laws of cricket for 2009 STATE: Law 28.1.IV- A fielder with his arm or hand, PROVIDING the ball is held in the hand of the arm touching the wicket then the batsman is clearly OUT BUT! if this is not the case as it is hear then what taufel should have done is gone to the 3rd umpire for a better idea and a 3 way view camera
Mr uploader, u worked so hard to upload the video but u forgot the main point of arguement...this runout was never about uthapa , the query is about sreesanth dislodging the bails with his foot before he hit stumps with ball. uthapa is nowhere near stumps but its a NOTOUT becoz sreesanth rattled stumps wid his foot ....watch ur video carefully :)
Between 0:11 - 0:12 you can see bail coming off while his hands are good few inches away from the wickets. It was his left foot removing bails first. That jangli should have worked out arms rather than ass muscles.
who ever says it's out is dumb and do not know what cricket is.
Sreesanth kicked the bail off b4 his hands toched the stumps, and sreesanth was too dumb that he didn't take the stump out of the ground... plus, who cares india won the freakin match!!!!!! :D
end of the day the umpire has given him out and his call is the final say.There have been plenty of blatant outs in the past given not out, it happens.move on.....its life
Quite clearly that idea Sreesanth hits the stumps with his left leg first. Freeze on 12 secs. The bail is off and it looks out. BUT, his left leg is not in view and neither is the final stump. Freeze on 14 secs and you can clearly see that the third stump is nowhere to be seen BECAUSE he hit it with his foot which is quite clear if you freeze it on 15 secs.
you guys need to get widescreen tv, the first front on shot clearly shows the bails off from his legs hitting the stumps - on wide screen tv you can see it easily. not out...
there is no rule about ball and feet, the rule says the ball must be in the hand and you can hit the stump with anything below the elbow.
hey all who say that it is not out dont be kiddish......first he knocked the stumps with the ball in his hand ....after that he could even can uproot the stumps and can enjoy nothing wrong in this its absolutely OUT !
He knocked the stumps with his foot, not with the arm/hand(s) holding the ball as required by the rules. He COULD have uprooted a stump following that to get the batsman out, but all three stumps were standing at the end.
It should have been not out; there's no ambiguity here.
"the rules states if the ball is in the fielder's hand and the stumps get knocked down at the same time by the ball and the feet, it's still out."
IF its at the same time, clearly was not as the bails moved BEFORE the ball gets there... and i don't know the exact wording of the rules but that doesn't sound right to me anyway... i mean why would they bother writing that in the rules? if the ball is there at the same time then of course its out because the ball still makes identical first contact
In no way could this be given out, as the bail had broken away from the stumps before the ball (Or the hand carrying the ball) made contact with the stumps.
The video description is totally wrong and misleading.
I think this was the 20/20 world cup. Judging by this clip, India should have been knocked out as it looks like the bail came off before the ball was in contact with the stumps. Even if the other bail was on, since there doesn't seem to be footage benefit should have gone to the batsman so Pak won it and India were knocked out!
To be fair, 2 other indians were blocking the umpires view, so as soon as he saw the bails dislodged, he thought it was out. No one would of realised Sreesanth kicked the stumps first (aside from himself and his other team-mates). The view of the stumps was pretty much blocked out from both the batsmen and the umpire.
this is for all those idiots that fink it has to be touche dby da ball,,,,
when a wicket keeper stops a ball at the stumps and has it in his hands and then hits the bails off, based on your logic the wicket keeper would have to throw the ball not put his hands to the stumps. so fink it through it dosent matter what part of the body hits the stumps AS LONG AS THE PERSON HAS THE BALL!!
Now i'm English so completely objective here. As mentioned at 0:11, the bails move before the ball has made contact with the stumps. Hence, if Santh had removed the stump from the ground then he would have been out.
The ball does need to be dislodged with the hand and not the feet also.
Well the rule states that u need to take off the bails with the hand holding the ball or hit ur hand holding the ball on the wicket so hard that the bails come off ... there is no such rule that you hit the wicket with ur foot while holding the ball, this is not baseball but cricket ... one of the example is when ball was thrown at Wasim Akram and he accidently stepped back and knocked the bails, what he did was took the wicket out and touch the ball with it, and this is real rule of cricket ;)
Absolutely clear - not out. The left bail begins to move at 0:12, well before his hands touch anything. He undoubtedly kicked the stumps before he broke them with his hand. Once the bails came off, he would need to pull up a stump to effect the run out.
Very interesting video. Lots of more such excitement and action will happen in the upcoming ICC T20 World Cup in England. Hoping to be there with Pepsi's First Ball ka Captain.
the ball has to hit the stumps his hands were covering the ball and he clearly kicked it the bails were of the stumps b4 the ball in his hands hit the stumps. it is not out
Does it matter if it was out or not? The score board says 141 - 6, Pak was obviously doomed to lose the match unless the guy who got out is some kind of superstar, which is highly unlikely since he is batting at the 5 or 6 position
100% OUT.........Ball in hand and hit the wicket.... I don't know whats the fuss here? every paki peace of shyt will say that. its 100% out without question asked...
ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket. i must say unlucky india
hamidaliraja 1 year ago 39
ppl who know cricket can see that he hit the stupms with his foot first; so it was not out. also it seems he even didnt touch the ball with the wicket.
hamidaliraja 1 year ago 2
Im confused... how on earth would this be a safe? The bail was struck of by the fielder when the batsman was not past the line. And just putting this out, Go Australia :)
Christopha33 1 year ago
Not out! if you pause it at around 0:12 the bails are off and he hasn't hit the stumps with the ball! Anyway can't change the decision now!
Shappers87 1 year ago 3
SAFE! NOT OUT!
KILL4N4IN 1 year ago 5
agree with abhimanc09 ...its out!!
kalpentllc 1 year ago
lol, it's funny cause at 0:12 you can clearly see the bails leaving the stumps before the ball is anywhere near it... he didn't uproot a stump after he kicked the bails off, therefore it's not out, lucky break for the pakis, tough luck for the indians
cantworkitout 1 year ago
The right decision would be not out. The wicket was broken before the ball in hand got there. In that circumstance the wicket is considered down. To effect a run out thereafter a stump needs to be removed from the ground. This is clearly stated in the laws of teh game.
As no stumps were removed the wicket was broken illegally before the ball so not out is the right decision.
razzletastic 1 year ago 5
pakistan won this match
ahmedjamal786 1 year ago
out bey saaley
sriramzworld 1 year ago
pakistani guys..dont attack..lol..looks like the foot broke the stumps but..seem like thats not even an arguement here so..i must be wrong..
lastroach 1 year ago
dats not out mate!!!! stumps broken by bowlers legs!!!!!!!
gihandealwis 1 year ago
i think that is NOT OUT!!
jamie2096 1 year ago
the ball didn't touch the wickets. His hands did
stephen98841272 1 year ago
From an unbiased Australian perspective, that certainly looked out to me... However, the benefit of the doubt MUST go to the batsman, so you can all stop complaining. When a decision is even a 1% uncertainty, then the batsman is Not Out. Hence, I am okay with the decision. Read the rulebook!
triplebettslord 1 year ago
It was out.Never mind because india still win
BaljitSingh7 1 year ago
Pause at around 0:12 and look veeeeeery carefully. Though you cannot see the foot, the bail is clearly dislodged BEFORE the fielder hits the stump with the ball. Unfortunate, but "not out" is indeed the correct decision.
keda1981 1 year ago
Just Now I watch this Video. Its NOT OUT. As per cricket rule, once the bills are jumped from the stumps, the next action stumps should be fell down to the ground. then only its approveed a wicket. Here stumps are still alive. So, its not out. I am an Indian. Whatever it is india is won the match.. I am Happy
chinnaprabaharan 1 year ago
it is clearly not out. he hit the wicket with his foot by accident first..the bails were clearly off before he hit the wicket!
ND18A 1 year ago
where's the controversy he's out by a country mile
Bearsir 1 year ago
that was not out becz if u focus on his feet he touch the wicket and fall the wills before touching the ball
choripaychori 1 year ago
What's wrong in it??????
Saipavanpilot1 1 year ago
i m relly sorry to say that it is NOT OUT !! i am a neutral not with Pak and not even with INDIA but i noticed the stumps were uprotten by the foot first!! u can clearly see that!! so the hands with ball not broke the stumps , it is not out!! i might be wrong but as the angle is around 40-45 so i cant make a good decision. however not out it is !!
mr123mrs 1 year ago
look at the foot of the person who is hitting the ball...his foot is between the stumps...
TheAli987 1 year ago
Did anyone else notice that the last ball was bowled at 90.2 mph? I never knew Sreesanth could touch the 90s, or its a malfunctioning speedometer.
write2pras84 1 year ago
itz out guyz
leo1991leo1 1 year ago
hhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm.....OUT!
Jibran382 1 year ago
law 28 states : 2. One bail off
If one bail is off, it shall be sufficient for the purpose of putting the wicket down to remove the remaining bail, or to strike or pull any of the three stumps out of the ground.
What isn't clear from this video is the state of both bails. one has clearly been dislodged - but what about the other ? - if it was intact he is out - if not he is not out.
tcsr229 1 year ago
it was not out one of the players was in the way of the umpire and so the umpire couldn't give it!!
3lliot968 1 year ago
I'm and Australian supporter and that definitely looks not out.
Gazzaismad 1 year ago
@Robafest: Please provide us with the law that states that it's out if the bails are dislodged by the ball and feet at the same time. I can't seem to find that!
dannyralph 1 year ago
Lol im aussie so dont get into ANOTHER india v pakistan thing here, but truthfully, it wasn't out, he took the bails off with his foot PRIOR to his hand with ball in it, so, no, it wasnt out
oscarwyatt69 1 year ago
It was an out bitches
you can just see
khuntsahil 1 year ago
NOT OUT
ssarfrazz 1 year ago
I know nothing of the particular match, but I think this should have been given not out, the stumps broken by anything but the ball or ball carrying hand then need to be uprooted for a runout. The angle is not perfect but it looks like the foot is what breaks the stumps. At around 48 seconds you can see a stump past the fielders but the hands are not knocking it out of place, they arrive later.
senluijr 1 year ago 2
@senluijr : you should be out of your head, its clear out
satishdan 1 year ago
thats.......not out
mrpikrik 1 year ago
heehee we won
p54786 1 year ago 15
It was out If wicket stump would have uprooted.Bcoz it is very clear that stumps were already hit by his leg before he hit his hands.It is just my opinion.
fahadDaar 1 year ago
n0t out.........
ch0rabali 1 year ago
I can see wat the pakistan supporters are talking about: he does hit the stumps with his foot before he hits the stumps with the ball
On the other hand it is really the same concept as if the wind blew the bails off after the bater has hit it
I think its a 50 50
CountKinsky 1 year ago
its not out! the bails are off before he even touched the stumps with the ball !!!
macman4575 1 year ago
guys i'm an Indian . it's not out look at Sreesanth's Left foot.
bijumik 1 year ago
What purpose does this video serve??
Coldbloodedkiller09 1 year ago
look at th pace there bro.good shree u bowl ur heart out .keep on bowling quick & aggressive.....................kick all candy ass in the field.........
RITEONFIRE 1 year ago
NOT OUT... watch again Sreesanth's own foot broke the stumps watch between 0:12-0:13 bails are off still his hand did not touch the wicket. But his foot hits the middle stump... which not visible at that time but visible at watch 0:17-0:22. It was good decision NOT OUT :)
shahzadafzal 1 year ago
NOT OUT
SnoddyD123 1 year ago
In the event that a player accidentally removed the bails from the stumps without using the ball or a hand holding the ball then he is required to remove a stump from the ground whilst holding the ball. Technically this should have been given not out. Given the nature of how far the player was from his crease, however, he probably shouldn't have been given not out anyway although the possibility that the Indian player was attempting to cheat should not be ignored.
Buggaton 1 year ago
Not out. Clearly not out. The bale is not going in the way it should be if it was disturbed by the fielder's hand with the ball. Bale is going to left, rather than up or right or even towards the camera.
bilalhidayat 1 year ago
rule says that if u have the ball in ur hand then u can knock the bails from any part of ur body....it doesn't matter.....just that the u shud be touching the ball!!! when a wicketkeeper does a run out or stumping then does he touches the ball to the stump?? !!?? no......bcoz the ball stays on his gloves and doesn't come in contact with the stump !!! once jhonty rhodes jumped on the stumps (his whole body was involved) to run out a batsmen
abhimamc09 1 year ago
@abhimamc09
You are incorrect. Read Law 28 - 1.(v), which clearly states the wicket has to be broken by the hand, or arm of the hand, which is holding the ball (either arm can break the wicket if the ball is held in both hands together). By the way, what decision did the umpire give, because it seems Sreesanth broke the wicket with his foot (12 seconds). DId he give him out?
massivesurfboard 1 year ago 70
that wasn't out, he hit the stumps with his foot, dislodged the bails, than hit the stumps with the ball, quite lucky that the indian players covered Taufel's view.
Afridi786 1 year ago
OUT!!!!!
torchwood496 1 year ago
My god, people are still not over this loss. wow
samirkapur 1 year ago
yea i agree
Yazza99roxdaworld12 1 year ago
omg he kicked it... tats not out man.. lol... Cheat to win eddy guerrero style :P
ba1achandar 1 year ago
Misbah was miles away, Sreesanth could have taken a nap n then taken the bails off, the idiot had to run through the stumps...
azzkickrrr 1 year ago
scuicide run.
negooog 1 year ago
these Pakistanis keep blowing themselves up over nothing
LickinMuhLips 1 year ago
probably not out
MrCummo02 1 year ago
dude....sreesanths foot actually disturbs the stumps...and even if it is out...get the fuck over it
11111sasuke11111 1 year ago
yup....he is out for sure.....even though the bails r off the stumps b4 the actual ball contact, he did uproot them.... thr r many cases previously of bails dropping and then batsman getting run out being uprooted.......please know your game b4 posting here.......it misleads people
liukang25 1 year ago
its out out out out out out out out out out
41600400 1 year ago
people who are saying that this is not out should get an eye-check-up done! :)
AkshatSharma25 1 year ago
ididnt see this match and i hate both of these teams but when sreesanths hands get to the stumps the bails are in the air. he mustve stepped on the stumps first cos the bails are in the air already when his hands touch the stumps. i dont even know what the rule is when that happens but u can clearly see that is what happens
spook707 2 years ago
not out
kanaya123 2 years ago
i would just like to point out that if the bails are knocked off by a player its not out, the only way this could be out is if he were to pull out the stump or for atleast 1 bail to still be in contact with the wickets.
Drummingnate96 2 years ago
Not out unfortunately - broke up the stumps and therefore flew the bails with his foot before his hands got there. I mean practically it should be out, but technically, it is not.
The ball MUST be there at the moment of impact and the bails coming off. Sure, he had full control of the ball, brought his hands to where the wicket was with the ball & the batsman was way out of the crease - but on the technically it should not be out - which kinda sucks really! So get a big black dog up ya :-)
artiebristles 2 years ago
not out- 0.11 you can see the bails coming off and he hasn't even touched the stumps with the ball yet. he would have known that as well!
8fimorris8 2 years ago
0.12 the bails are broken before his hands are anywhere near the stumps not out
stoner2816 2 years ago
not out, stumps were broken by foot, should have pulled a stump out of the ground and touched it with the ball for the wicket...
Toyjetski 2 years ago
though it was a not out.
Sreesanth's foot hit the stumps before the ball hit @ 0:12.
but umpire's decision is last decision. and India won.
kudos to India
mils2211 2 years ago
at 0:11 you can clearly see it is not out....sreesanth kicked the stumps and bails are off before he touched the stumps....
and please don't abuse....i am an indian too....but truth is that was not out.
bikkubadmash 2 years ago
Wait r u saying that this wasnt given out!? I mean hes frickin out by MILES!! n Simon Taufel's a great ump too; cant believe he blew this one!
HeRsHeYsKiSsz 2 years ago
guys it's not out ok.... robafest... shhh your wrong, the real rules say if the bails are broken before before the the run out happends the feilder must remove the stump from the groud with the ball in his hands...... so there ya go
lemo647 2 years ago
he hit it with his foot
tylerboyd11 2 years ago
clearly not out
CabBennett 2 years ago
it's not out, the fielder hit it with his hand
DemoDarby 2 years ago
wouldnt it have been a draw?
cheezie760 2 years ago
it is clearly not out...but the fact is if hi leg might not hve hit it was going to be definitely out...!!!
we agree the fact that mistakes happen!!!
vensoa007 2 years ago
it was out or not out??????
seeragill 2 years ago
He's not out...Out dislodged the bails with his feet before hitting the ball on the wickets
veilside5st 2 years ago
thats not out look at frames 12 and before...the stumps were broken before the fielder with the ball hit the wicket..seems the stumps were knocked by the other fielder
k310user 2 years ago
fuck u pakis for evaluating the defeat at the hands of indians..even if sreeshanth used his dick to dislodge the bails, thats still his fuckin dick and not urs....he fuckin dislodged you out of the tournament..so stop crying and let misbah practice harder to perfect the scoop shot...lol
snyperdoc 2 years ago
not out
souravkabir 2 years ago
NOT OUT!!!! that is final
he hit the stumps with his foot. this means he has to pull the stump out to get him out
chesalinko 2 years ago
no doubt its out...........
naveen3477 2 years ago
0:12 not out
kamiamm90 2 years ago
0:12 not out...coz bails come out becoz of his foot hit the stumps
kamiamm90 2 years ago
who cares it's one day cricket
Tyszkiewiczowie 2 years ago
look at sreesanths foot at 0:14
littlebritan 2 years ago
how many indians does it take to run a player out?! hahahhah
k847 2 years ago
not out..0.11 wicket is comming off before the ball hits it
frankpathirage 2 years ago
clearly... NOT OUT!
ph0ul 2 years ago
I would say NOT Out ... just my views.. I am not a cricket expert neither an umpire... just played international ICC level 3 cricket for 2 years...
SRA1182 2 years ago
OUT - SLAP - WAAAAAAAA !!
TheTattikarlo 2 years ago
Don't really care, but its obvious at 0:11 that the stumps break before the ball makes contact, seemingly from the foot of the player. They had to pull the stump out to get this run out.
gofrenzalgo 2 years ago
the description of the video misses the point of the argument. This has nothing to do with Uthappa's legs at all, He didnt even touch the stumps. Its the fact that sreesanth uprooted the bails with his foot before the ball hit the stumps, so he must now remove a stump completely which he didnt. If this is out, then you could hold a ball in your hand and kick the stumps with your legs, which is not allowed.
handsleep 2 years ago
whatever.....umpire is the king in the ground.....
robintt1990 2 years ago
hahahahaha not out!
redninja31 2 years ago
hahaha not out
btg091 2 years ago
u say Tafel had a good look? at 0.47/8 the indinan players have blurrred his view of the stumps and to Robafest tryngstate the rulesof stump breaking.
The MCC handbook on the laws of cricket for 2009 STATE: Law 28.1.IV- A fielder with his arm or hand, PROVIDING the ball is held in the hand of the arm touching the wicket then the batsman is clearly OUT BUT! if this is not the case as it is hear then what taufel should have done is gone to the 3rd umpire for a better idea and a 3 way view camera
MikeyKeogh 2 years ago
out
littlebritan 2 years ago
Mr uploader, u worked so hard to upload the video but u forgot the main point of arguement...this runout was never about uthapa , the query is about sreesanth dislodging the bails with his foot before he hit stumps with ball. uthapa is nowhere near stumps but its a NOTOUT becoz sreesanth rattled stumps wid his foot ....watch ur video carefully :)
AW41S 2 years ago
the ball didnt touch the wickets. his HANDS knocke the stumps off
MJforYOO 2 years ago
Clearly NOT out!
Between 0:11 - 0:12 you can see bail coming off while his hands are good few inches away from the wickets. It was his left foot removing bails first. That jangli should have worked out arms rather than ass muscles.
tommyboy745 2 years ago
not out. the only other part of you that can hit the stumps is your hand or glove from wicket keeper. feet dont count. not out.
singningwongho 2 years ago
not out he kicked the stumps probs
beeslay123 2 years ago
who ever says it's out is dumb and do not know what cricket is.
Sreesanth kicked the bail off b4 his hands toched the stumps, and sreesanth was too dumb that he didn't take the stump out of the ground... plus, who cares india won the freakin match!!!!!! :D
captainhookhand 2 years ago
Haha it's funny because this video proves it was not out
davenavarroforpm 2 years ago
Not out! THe Fielders foot takes the bails off not the hand with the ball in.
dcnc20 2 years ago
end of the day the umpire has given him out and his call is the final say.There have been plenty of blatant outs in the past given not out, it happens.move on.....its life
cerebalAssasin1987 2 years ago
Quite clearly that idea Sreesanth hits the stumps with his left leg first. Freeze on 12 secs. The bail is off and it looks out. BUT, his left leg is not in view and neither is the final stump. Freeze on 14 secs and you can clearly see that the third stump is nowhere to be seen BECAUSE he hit it with his foot which is quite clear if you freeze it on 15 secs.
saamir9000 2 years ago
you guys need to get widescreen tv, the first front on shot clearly shows the bails off from his legs hitting the stumps - on wide screen tv you can see it easily. not out...
there is no rule about ball and feet, the rule says the ball must be in the hand and you can hit the stump with anything below the elbow.
kiasecto 2 years ago
not out!!!
usmanadz 2 years ago
0.48 its out
jerin123456 2 years ago 5
@jerin123456 I would have givin than not out actually! Watch 0.12 you can see another player knocking the bails off accidently with his foot.
freelynz 1 year ago
hey all who say that it is not out dont be kiddish......first he knocked the stumps with the ball in his hand ....after that he could even can uproot the stumps and can enjoy nothing wrong in this its absolutely OUT !
rvvenkyjalsa171 2 years ago 39
He knocked the stumps with his foot, not with the arm/hand(s) holding the ball as required by the rules. He COULD have uprooted a stump following that to get the batsman out, but all three stumps were standing at the end.
It should have been not out; there's no ambiguity here.
mss202 2 years ago
@rvvenkyjalsa171 the bail was already in the air before the ball made any contact...so it was sreesanths leg dat took off the bail...
vishwadeep055 1 year ago
@rvvenkyjalsa171 the bail was already in the air before the ball made any contact...so it was sreesanths leg dat took off the bail...
vishwadeep055 1 year ago
@rvvenkyjalsa171 the bail was already in the air before the ball made any contact...so it was sreesanths leg dat took off the bail...
vishwadeep055 1 year ago
which dumb ass cant see clearly it's out . see a very interesting vid at my profile.
anuj18 2 years ago 15
whatever it is.. india won the match...
talwarraja 2 years ago 48
they tied that match
kirankerai 1 year ago
Guys! it is clearly not out. Sreesanth touched middle stump with his foot before hitting with ball.
It is good video. Also good umpiring.
Thanks for nice video.
neutraldud 2 years ago
true. and if he wanted to get the batsman out, he should have uprooted the stumps.
marthi1989 2 years ago
but there's no way the ump could've even seen that...the second angle clearly shows that Taufel's view of the stumps is blocked by the fielders
HeRsHeYsKiSsz 2 years ago
stop crying
illkillyou33 2 years ago 4
not out.
freddrocks 2 years ago
not out the bails begin to come off before the ball hits the stumps
ots2ots 2 years ago
"the rules states if the ball is in the fielder's hand and the stumps get knocked down at the same time by the ball and the feet, it's still out."
IF its at the same time, clearly was not as the bails moved BEFORE the ball gets there... and i don't know the exact wording of the rules but that doesn't sound right to me anyway... i mean why would they bother writing that in the rules? if the ball is there at the same time then of course its out because the ball still makes identical first contact
Robafest 2 years ago 6
notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notout notoutnotout
jobnahi 2 years ago
yea the bails come off before the hands hit the stumps, so he clearly kicks em, so not out
russellhwk 2 years ago
100% NOT OUT.
In no way could this be given out, as the bail had broken away from the stumps before the ball (Or the hand carrying the ball) made contact with the stumps.
The video description is totally wrong and misleading.
Playtechy 2 years ago
I think this was the 20/20 world cup. Judging by this clip, India should have been knocked out as it looks like the bail came off before the ball was in contact with the stumps. Even if the other bail was on, since there doesn't seem to be footage benefit should have gone to the batsman so Pak won it and India were knocked out!
umyafzal 2 years ago
with the wicket keeper his glove can just hit the stumps with the ball in his hand and that is what happened
cholsey1 2 years ago
Well the umpires have the last say thats all that matters if its given out batsmen has to go
ratboy2342 2 years ago
cheating indians
truplaya147 2 years ago
oh shit wat drama lol it was 1 ball left and 1 run to win. but its not out lol
nikefitcr9 2 years ago
NOT OUT.
oortclouddomicile 2 years ago
anyway, india won hehhh!!! i dotn care about OUT or NOT OUT respect umpire
vanlal007 2 years ago
no doubt... it was out.... m playing in ICL n knw d rules..
trwats 2 years ago
not out
at 11seconds the bails are removed when the ball is nt even touching the stumps
jealous indian bitch
HAMMYZ94 2 years ago
both bails were off the stumps when srisaanth hit da stumps......never mind .......forget past
AliLuvPak 2 years ago
gotta agree 100% not out
patrick2k8 2 years ago
To be fair, 2 other indians were blocking the umpires view, so as soon as he saw the bails dislodged, he thought it was out. No one would of realised Sreesanth kicked the stumps first (aside from himself and his other team-mates). The view of the stumps was pretty much blocked out from both the batsmen and the umpire.
nanotech96 2 years ago
this is the first india pakistan video i saw without any fight
MegaMusman 2 years ago
dats not out
loop582 2 years ago
THIs was not bloody out!!!!!!!!!
hairyhog69 2 years ago
jo v ho,at last in d final india won.....
9861232567 2 years ago
Clearly not out.... no doubt about it
khabora 2 years ago
all it is that pakistan is nothing but a bunch of bottom feeders.
whitehawk38 2 years ago
i think its not out!
marazaa 2 years ago
this is for all those idiots that fink it has to be touche dby da ball,,,,
when a wicket keeper stops a ball at the stumps and has it in his hands and then hits the bails off, based on your logic the wicket keeper would have to throw the ball not put his hands to the stumps. so fink it through it dosent matter what part of the body hits the stumps AS LONG AS THE PERSON HAS THE BALL!!
jmcc228 2 years ago
@gystav
thts only for wicket keeper not for fielder
osmanshoaib 2 years ago
i think thats not out bcz uthapa touchs the stumps its rite b4 the ball hit the stumps bail were shakkin
baigskt 2 years ago
im from pakistan but i think it was out but who cares india are out and pak are in semis
stephanieMcmahon3468 2 years ago
its cos they were in the way so he cudnt see
Bucc45 2 years ago
Yep, that is Not Out.
Now i'm English so completely objective here. As mentioned at 0:11, the bails move before the ball has made contact with the stumps. Hence, if Santh had removed the stump from the ground then he would have been out.
The ball does need to be dislodged with the hand and not the feet also.
greg19925 2 years ago
Well the rule states that u need to take off the bails with the hand holding the ball or hit ur hand holding the ball on the wicket so hard that the bails come off ... there is no such rule that you hit the wicket with ur foot while holding the ball, this is not baseball but cricket ... one of the example is when ball was thrown at Wasim Akram and he accidently stepped back and knocked the bails, what he did was took the wicket out and touch the ball with it, and this is real rule of cricket ;)
mobeenkhan2k2 2 years ago
It is out....
If u have the ball in your hand and u touch the stumb..It counts.
awwpakistan 2 years ago
Hahahaha. that was given out. we won the match.....
talwarraja 2 years ago
Clean Out ;)
IndianPride34 2 years ago
which bitch it was out..
redaag 2 years ago
Sorry... NOT OUT!!!!!
sportypaulos 2 years ago
game over..india won..jus get over it now
actionmancreation 2 years ago
Not out. Sorry. I really don't like Sreesanth as a man, he gave us the middle finger two years ago....
lubidog 2 years ago
it definitely is a not out if you see clearly the bails went off before sreesanths hand reached the stumps
amilkoul 2 years ago
Absolutely clear - not out. The left bail begins to move at 0:12, well before his hands touch anything. He undoubtedly kicked the stumps before he broke them with his hand. Once the bails came off, he would need to pull up a stump to effect the run out.
tonythekingfisher 2 years ago
it was out
shekharoberoi 2 years ago
Very interesting video. Lots of more such excitement and action will happen in the upcoming ICC T20 World Cup in England. Hoping to be there with Pepsi's First Ball ka Captain.
jesswalt01 2 years ago
the ball has to hit the stumps his hands were covering the ball and he clearly kicked it the bails were of the stumps b4 the ball in his hands hit the stumps. it is not out
ballsie12345 2 years ago
100n1% OUTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
BabbiBanger 2 years ago
good one
gangulymahesh 2 years ago
his feet hit the stups first and if i was the apire i will give it not out
sufayn2002 2 years ago
u r right i wa s a not out bt who cares
ronit227 2 years ago
Does it matter if it was out or not? The score board says 141 - 6, Pak was obviously doomed to lose the match unless the guy who got out is some kind of superstar, which is highly unlikely since he is batting at the 5 or 6 position
LOLMAN22 2 years ago
it was out but umpire was blind
cricketcracker420 2 years ago
100% OUT.........Ball in hand and hit the wicket.... I don't know whats the fuss here? every paki peace of shyt will say that. its 100% out without question asked...
Rahulioo 2 years ago
his hand touched the stumps At 00 .13 to 00.14
Thats out
bollyman123 2 years ago