If you understand the data processing methods of both sensors, you will not take a decision after this video.
CMOS has an extra feature: high speed video capturnig (my Fuji HS10 is able to record video with 1000 FPS). If you still want to record fast moving objects, high speed will serve you well (of course, resolution won't be high, but in 60 FPS mode 720p is still available).
Because of different data processing method, you can't find CCD cameras with high frame rate in this price category.
CCD is better video quality but more expensive to make and consume more power. CMOS had jello effect even with less shaking than this video but I don't know why manufactures proudly ad. CMOS sensor on photos/video products (maybe battery last longer?)
depends on the type of shooting you do. There are still shots, motion, pan, dolly, forklift, interviews, action scenes, sports scenes, fashion footage .... This type of sensor can be used only if you make panoramic shots fixed or slow. (Of course I'm talking about serious shooting) for amateur footage is excellent. bad if you need to add post-production elements in the action scenes, almost impossible to do stable links.
I have cmos camera, and this is not a fake video. BUT! If you take high resolution videos, you don't shake your digicam like this. If you do this test with higher framerate (up to 1000 FPS, as for CCD digicams this is technologically unreachable) all edges will be as sharp as it could be. Last but not least there's no man, who takes vids like you.
If you understand the data processing methods of both sensors, you will not take a decision after this video.
CMOS has an extra feature: high speed video capturnig (my Fuji HS10 is able to record video with 1000 FPS). If you still want to record fast moving objects, high speed will serve you well (of course, resolution won't be high, but in 60 FPS mode 720p is still available).
Because of different data processing method, you can't find CCD cameras with high frame rate in this price category.
ktkdiabl0 1 month ago
CCD is better video quality but more expensive to make and consume more power. CMOS had jello effect even with less shaking than this video but I don't know why manufactures proudly ad. CMOS sensor on photos/video products (maybe battery last longer?)
dvh065 2 months ago
depends on the type of shooting you do. There are still shots, motion, pan, dolly, forklift, interviews, action scenes, sports scenes, fashion footage .... This type of sensor can be used only if you make panoramic shots fixed or slow. (Of course I'm talking about serious shooting) for amateur footage is excellent. bad if you need to add post-production elements in the action scenes, almost impossible to do stable links.
trewio 4 months ago
I have cmos camera, and this is not a fake video. BUT! If you take high resolution videos, you don't shake your digicam like this. If you do this test with higher framerate (up to 1000 FPS, as for CCD digicams this is technologically unreachable) all edges will be as sharp as it could be. Last but not least there's no man, who takes vids like you.
ktkdiablo 5 months ago