Added: 4 months ago
From: illuminatitv
Views: 2,072
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Congratulations, you won a debate with a moron. The answer is that all abortions come with a risk of harm to the woman having them. So, a woman using abortion as a form of birth control is acting irrationally. That woman should use other forms of birth control that are much more safe for her.

  • I love this guy. (nohomo)

  • I'm a man and I get abortions all the time. It really is fun.

  • I suspect that the reason your friend was squeamish about multiple abortions was because he was either squeamish about abortions period, or didn't want to look like an unrepentant 'baby-killer' in front of a well-known Internet conservative. I, however, have no such qualms. Abortion as birth control is fine by me. Your argument is invalid. Good day.

  • .It's a simple answer- YES. you have no right on other people's bodies nor their life

    I think you call this kind of questions in English- "smart ass questions" don't you? cause it's very easy going to the other extreme and ask you why don't you go against masturbation too

    the logic behind this video is that since this fellow talked to someone who allegedly couldn''t answer his question that means that anyone who supports abortion is a stupid dilettante. That's not the way to make a case

  • @LibertyProjectIL you are entirely correct, the parent has no right to end the unborn child's life prematurely. It's no longer their sperm or egg, and killing it is murder. A sperm is not a new human being until it successfully joins with an egg. This is well documented, therefore masturbation is not illegal, because it is not murder.

  • The problem with watching Milton Friedman too often is that afterwards when hearing demagoguery instead of arguments it just really pisses you off thinking about the 5 minutes you have waisted on such stupid video instead of watching Milton or Ronnie or Maggie or someone who doesn't play mind games with any random dumb ass. You have some really nice videos but this one is stupid in my opinion and aint gonna convince anyone whatsoever

  • @LibertyProjectIL i think he make a great point! so can u answer the question?

  • (cont.)

    That was my ideological opinion. In reality I wouldn't suggest it. We need to compromise with the pro-lifers. I used to be one, and I understand their argument, even though I no longer agree with it.

    We can use condoms and other forms of birth control, and it pisses people off less, so why not?

  • sweet, honest debate. As much as I disagree with almost everything Molotov says, I love how the comments are open.

    For the most part I agree with that pitiable dude, even though I don't think that was the right place for such a discussion.

    With pure logic (and no sensitivity to societal pressure) I think unlimited abortions before the nervous system develops is fine, assuming the taxpayer doesn't have to foot the bill.

  • I really like a lot of what you say, but do you also agree with Ron Paul's view of Iran getting nuclear weapons?

  • WHY would you ruin ya boys cookout like that? Everytime someone grabs a burger with a side of liberal agenda, someone has to toss Molotov of common sense. ;) Great vid. I love the responses these vids get. Sometimes I wonder if libs and commies get so angry with Molotov and "common sense," that they shake furiously and scream, "MOLOTOV' as if his name were Khan. I bet the guy at the cookout did. . .

  • Personal responsibility is paramount in this discussion as well - a woman who had been raped should be able to choose for herself {or even in the event of a malformed child} but for not being accountable for promiscuous sex?! Naaah!

  • "rape and incest"... Poor excuse.. Why kill the child for the crime of the father?? Why not give the child up for adoption?

  • @HIGHLANDERxMCLAMBIE Child? Just abort it early when its just a mass of cells.

  • Woman get abortions for many reasons, but off the top of my head a woman who is pro-choice would want to minimally reduce the number of abortions she might have to have because they can be extremely painful, extremely expensive, and if done incorrectly extremely harmful to the woman.

    So why would someone want to avoid pain, money loss, and increased risk of lasting bodily harm??

  • And guess what Mr. Molotov... the same logic can be used against pro-lifers. If even one abortion occurs at any point, for any reason including ectopic and other medical reasons...that's murder according to you.

    My wife had to abort her pregnancy recently. Yep. Ectopic. So, I ask you... what's the difference in a 1st trimester abortion due to whatever medical condition vs. millions done by choice? After all, it's all "murder", isn't it? Even just one abortion?

  • @jtnoodle - You're obviously too stupid from indoctrination to understand what he's talking about.

  • @thomaserossi Not exactly a well thought out retort on your part. You need to be a bit more thorough in your response for me to take you seriously.

  • made up story, thumbs down

  • I am always amazed how fast rape and incest come up when talking about abortion. We all know that over 99% of abortions are just last ditch birth control. The simple easy way to solve this little excuse tactic would be to require the police report at the abortion clinic. I think you should have to go before a judge in a courtroom before having an abortion. Under age women would be required to turn thier abusers. Of course that would protect women instead of row v wade.

  • lol well said

  • You know my answer to rape is actually a question itself. So does the baby, oops I mean fetus, should be punished for the crime of rape? Just something to ponder.

  • At 2:15: 'B-B-BUT, BUT, RAPE...'

    Dialogue became irrelevant — can't get pregnant through the pooper.

  • Comment removed

  • You are not invited to my BBQ. XD

  • Seems to me that this is a very personal decision for the woman (and man) involved. The gubmt should not be involved in these very personal decisions. Both the woman and man have to go through this and live with their decision. Legislating this sort of thing is not in the constitution.

  • A friend of mine had a child that was born under 4. Her preacher convinced her not to have the abortion the child "Lived" For 78 hoers and knew only Paine. Today she regrets not having the abortion

  • I can Answer that actually. The only time abortion should be allowed is under theirs 4 situations.

    1. Rape.

    2. Incest.

    3. the Child is putting the mothers life at risk and theirs not other choice

    And

    4. The child has a sever berth defect that the child's life is going to be a short pain filled existence.

  • @agamimnon423 Yea, because a human with severe defects are worth less than normal humans.

  • @TheHossUSMC Defects that allow you to only live in pane for your pref existence Yes. Its not a life worth living. I'm not talking like down syndrome or mentile retardation. I'm talking a defect that twists your body so that nearv endings are exposed to air. the only sensation you know from the moment your brought into the world is searing pain. And As I said in my second post I had a friend that experienced such a berth. Her choice to have the child has left her a broken shell.

  • "180"movie.com is a good answer

  • Like everyone else here is saying, the "why" is that one abortion is unhealthy, but each successive one gets exponentially dangerous and unhealthy and many women die after several abortions and/or lose the ability to have kids later on.

  • Abortion as a form of birth control is both inefficient and unhealthy. While I would never advise someone to use abortion as their primary form of birth control it's their right I guess.

    I wish I had friends to debate abortion about ;_;

  • You nail it every time dude.... so glad to see you back with a vengeance.

  • Why is using abortion as your only form of birth control asinine? Because pregnancy isn't the only risk associated with unprotected sex. Abortion in no way protects against any STDs. Unless you want AIDS, herpes, or whatever but don't want babies. In which case... feel free, I guess?

  • Because multiple abortions can cause long term medical problems.

    There, stupid question answered.

  • agreed

    

  • I really liked this argument. Very good video. I'm still a pro-choicer (I don't consider it murder, but i do consider it morally wrong...killing an animal, for example), but I will prob. use this argument against those people similar to the guy you described.

  • Brilliant! Absolute genius! Of course you knew that.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more