Added: 3 years ago
From: starrdreams
Views: 4,117
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Look I abandoned my car this winter with snow up to my knees. Endured temperatures of minus fifteen degees celcius. Watched America freeze and you expect the public to believe this Global warming bullshit.

  • What a load of scaremongering propaganda. I smell protection racket. There is nothing to deny. The warming was probably caused by the Grand Solar Maximum. The whole theory of man made global warming due the the producing of co2 should be rejected. There is no smokescreen we are all seaching out the truth. NO scientist can see into the future.

  • Again no proof and now, lets change the name to something we can actually prove. These jokers just want to control your life. The only danger, is the government getting to big and show who the boss really is.

  • john is a lying sack of bovine dung!!

  • Global bull shit!

  • Hey Holdren wait! Here is a better idea for a name. "Natural Cyclical Climate Change." Go on Holdren tell them about those polar ice core samples taken. The ones that show how CO2 gasses(greenhouse gasses) and temperatures have been rising suddenly then dropping gradually on a 50-60 year loop for the past 600 years.

  • Somebody should stop Amy Goodman from polluting the audible range with her scotch and cigarette ravaged voice. I'm so sick of hearing this communist cunt's gravel on WMNF, but they can't seem to get enough of her. How many times does her bullshit have to be totally destroyed in public before the tie-dies will realize that unlike Jerry Garcia, she has contributed nothing to society?

  • Hey everybody, according to science Earth has existed for 4.5 billion years. Do you really think our species is going to kill the planet? You are so STUPID if you think that. This planet isn't what's important, WE are. We SHOULD take care of the planet, but Mr. Holdren is suggesting that we MURDER 85% of the population. Before we start caring about the ecosystem of our 4.5 billion year old planet, lets start caring about each other first and stop wars and poverty.

  • it's all related to 12/21/2012. galactic alignment.

  • Comment removed

  • @dubasher No, solar influence is too weak to have such change in global climate as we have now.

  • starrdreams seems to be an ACORN/Obama Jugend bot gone haywire.

  • That is all what you know about climate change?

  • That's all knowledge on Climate Change you have ?

  • Better try to make arguments regarding scientific data on Climate Change.

  • So don't read media. And some blogs too.

    Try to read scientific news.

  • @starrdreams...if your doing your research in nothing but science magazines and other articles i suggest you look into the denialists point of view....anything related to the media can be and IS manipulated by our government....who do you think owns all these company's and why do you think there is only a single reporter willing to fight against these wacko's....because everyone has been bought out and our government has its own secret agenda that they will put into affect through manipulation.

  • @g3tThIs0rDiE If you read denialists blogs tell me - from where their data? From science? So you choose to believe that scientific resources which I use are manipulated and lie, but those you believe, are not manipulated and truth. How?

  • Obamas chief of science John Holdren advocated forced abortions, mass sterilization through food and water supply and mandatory bodily implants to prevent pregnancies on u.s.a citizens . This is no hobby of his he belives this is all ok .

  • We are talking about climate change science - not about who said what in 1970 s.

  • fuck this eugenisist dickhead

  • Very stupid argument, actually.

  • You never hear anything about the effects of depleted uranium used in munitions on people, birth defects. Poisoning the land and water wherever it is used for basically forever, I guess that would interfere with corporate war profits. It's all about control and only what gives them that control. Everything else is swept under the rug.

  • Wow, you said it, friend. He is dangerous just like those other egg-heads who create viruses that could wipe out all of humanity if let loose, just to see if they could do it.

    I just made a video about this nutjob. I invite everyone to watch it.

    Or not.

  • Who said you he is dangerous?

  • "Who said you he is dangerous?"

    --Is that English, or NewSpeak?

    I think I was responding to someone else. But he is dangerous, his ideas are dangerous, they are akin to what the Nazis said.

  • @NoGuff What kind of "his ideas are dangerous"?

  • "What kind of "his ideas are dangerous"?"

    --You obviously know nothing about John Holdren.

    Here, I'll list just a few:

    -There are too many people on Earth and we must reduce the population via drastic means.

    -Including forced abortions.

    -Including forced kidnapping of the children of single mothers.

    -Including secretly adding sterilizing agents to the food & water we consume.

    Need any others? I suggest you watch my video on Holdren and then let me know what you think.

  • @NoGuff Are you still living in the past? Today is the end of 2009.

  • "Today is the end of 2009"

    --Yes, and 2 weeks after "ClimateGate."

    Vindication for denial.

    I think you should also watch my other "Czars" video, it applies to "green" shit and "global warming."

  • John Holdren, son of a bitch, wants to force sterilization, have a baby tax and a world government to tax the shit out of everyone.

    Sovereign Nations must take care of their own. This guy is a Nazi Utopian maniac. Who would be the Beneficiary to this one world $ystem? Follow the money.

  • Better read science news on Climate change - not some denialists blogs.

  • John Holdren, 1977: "... One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings ... "

    z o m b i e t i m e . c o m / j o h n _ h o l d r e n

  • So what? Today is 2009. Better try to make arguments on Climate Change scientific data

  • Obama man, Bush hater. Dismissed.

  • UFO Disclosure is crucial to science and technology and our future! Tell the truth about what really crashed near Roswell in 1947!

  • Good video, interesting points would like to here more on sun melting caps on Mars though and the snow falling from clouds that Canadian instruments detected last fall. Solar heating, time to drop the cultural in-fighting I think.

  • I recognize the name now - he's the president's new science advisor! He's the one that wants to put the sulfur back into the air!

  • Incorrect. Holdren only acknowledges that sulfate particles may used as a last ditch semi-solution to the problem. He will also tell you that the unforseen consequences makes such a decision extremely dangerous.

  • Any "warming" due to human activity could be attributed to humans putting surface stations next to exhaust fans, brick buildings, blacktop and concrete surfaces, etc. It's probably the only human activity that "causes" warming - of the thermometer, that is.

  • Please show me one case where people had to move because of rising water from global warming. And prove it was rising water and not land sinking due to tectonics.

  • Please try to do your homework.

  • It seems to me you are the one who needs to do your homework. Tectonic plates and volcanism raise and lower islands all the time. What do you think the Hawaiian Islands are doing? Or the Aleutians? The volcanic activity creates new islands and old ones are disappearing. That's clear observable science. The oceans are not rising by any significant amount. How does one measure 1 millimeter with any degree of accuracy when ocean waves are lapping the shore?

  • Search in Google these articles:

    "Rising Sea Levels Set To Have Major Impacts Around The World" (Mar. 11, 2009)

    "Sea Level Rise Due To Global Warming Poses Threat To New York City" (Mar. 16, 2009)

    "Sea level rise: It's worse than we thought" (July 1 2009)

  • Did you notice all the speculative words in those articles? "are expected" "chance" "Perhaps" "Perhaps" "Potential" "Could" "Possibly" You haven't shown me any proof of anyone having to move due to rising water.

    I checked out your articles, now how bout you checking out the iceagenow . com interview with Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner? The article is "Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud"

  • @anoniab Words such as "are expected" "chance" "Perhaps" "Perhaps" "Potential" "Could" "Possibly" are normal in the science.

  • One of monkey[species] to die might be us.

  • The problem is when believers are strong enough to force this believe or religion on non-believers, and want them to suffer to please their God, and based on utter nonsens.

    The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda.

    To see more of my arguments, google - > global warming is a religion

  • Better try read scientific news - not some blogs.

  • This guy is a stooge, like all leadership, who's patrons are the likes of the CFR and other notorious groups. The guy is a eugencists that toes the line for world government.

    Now don't think of this as conspiracy you look it up, I'll look into the science news and magazines who's patrons are the CFR, Carnegie, and Rothschild front companies. This stuff is stranger than fiction.

  • Global warming is a religion. Or is it a disease?

    Read the Skeptics Handbook on Global Warming -> google

  • Global warming is a process of changes in many parts of global climate system. How people deal with that - that another question. We can believe in it or not believe - that's our choice. To be skeptical is OK. But skepticism is not an answer - that's just position when you are not sure that some explanation explains everything. That's normal for both sides. But problem is when skeptical people thinks they have ONE answer to everything regarding climate change. There is no one answer.

  • Thanks for these videos and links!

    This guy is great, I hope he influences Obama into action ASAP.

  • this guy is a potential hero..! one to say it like it is and not being afraid.. luckily he is on board the Obama team .

  • This physicists isn't even attack the scientific models presented by the physicists who don't buy the anthropogenic induced climate change models, who just labeling them as 'global warmer deniers' and that they are paid by Exxon oil companies to attach the anthropogenic induced climate change model.

  • Thanks for posting :)

  • John was a classmate in San Mateo. Smartest kid in 3rd Grade on up to HS. Big Oil should be quaking in their boots.

  • It's great to hear that. I'm glad he's Obama's science adviser, now maybe something will actually get done. We've wasted eight years!

  • I'm glad as well :D

  • Me too. Finally real science will be a factor in public policy.

  • I would have to agree with John Holdren that the term "Global Warming" understates the disaster this planet is facing.

    That term implies that all we need concern ourselves with is an 85 degree day instead of a 84 degree day during the summer.

    I love the term "denialists". It is akin to the term "Gishers" that came out of the creation myth vice evolution science debates of the 1980's.

  • .

    Check description for links ->>

    .

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more