@silharima Thank you for your kind words, but I'm not Philip Larkin. I'm Tom O'Bedlam and I read everything in the SpokenVerse channel. I hope yopu will listen to a few more.
@SpokenVerse Well, you have out-Larkin'd the original! And I still enjoyed the reading immensely. I'm already subscribed to your channel, so I ought to have recognized this one -- but let's just blame absent-mindedness.
I think I agree with you that Larkin's despair was a fruit of his selfishness: he reminds me of Horace, who also never married (but had a collection of pornography even Augustus envied).
This is a fine reading, it does justice to the piece.
Setting the poem in this typeface however seems to me actually to slightly improve on Larkin:- it foregrounds a power in the poem Larkin hasn't made as explicit as he might have.
I hope you have turned it into a poster somewhere - it deserves at least that.
I channeled Mr. Larkin for a fleeting moment while reading the paragraph that begins "We feel a sense of reward if others are surviving and prospering --" misreading, as I reached the last sentence, "Nothing could be more odious." -- heheh ...
A marvelous reading! Nothing compares to hearing a poem delivered by its author.
silharima 11 months ago
@silharima Thank you for your kind words, but I'm not Philip Larkin. I'm Tom O'Bedlam and I read everything in the SpokenVerse channel. I hope yopu will listen to a few more.
SpokenVerse 11 months ago
@SpokenVerse Well, you have out-Larkin'd the original! And I still enjoyed the reading immensely. I'm already subscribed to your channel, so I ought to have recognized this one -- but let's just blame absent-mindedness.
silharima 11 months ago
I think I agree with you that Larkin's despair was a fruit of his selfishness: he reminds me of Horace, who also never married (but had a collection of pornography even Augustus envied).
This is a fine reading, it does justice to the piece.
Setting the poem in this typeface however seems to me actually to slightly improve on Larkin:- it foregrounds a power in the poem Larkin hasn't made as explicit as he might have.
I hope you have turned it into a poster somewhere - it deserves at least that.
thallassocracy 1 year ago
That's my painting - The Dead Poet , a portrait i did for the owner. You can see it at my web site petertartaglia "forget it jake, it's chinatown"
tyrelcorp2004 1 year ago
@tyrelcorp2004 Yes, there's a link in the notes. If you want me to remove it, I will.
SpokenVerse 1 year ago
not at all! i enjoyed seeing it again. pete t
tyrelcorp2004 1 year ago
@tyrelcorp2004 how did you get a link in there? can you let me know how?
tyrelcorp2004 1 year ago
joseph brodsky once said that he was a "biological determinist"
but, what I think it means is that man's love has to be greater than his in built love. the genetic code makes its little love a necessity
this love is, to me at least, inherently a sham
bluecliff03 1 year ago
Nice!
SelfishMonologues 1 year ago
I channeled Mr. Larkin for a fleeting moment while reading the paragraph that begins "We feel a sense of reward if others are surviving and prospering --" misreading, as I reached the last sentence, "Nothing could be more odious." -- heheh ...
liz1060 1 year ago