Magnet Experiment : Oppsite repel, like charges attract

[mishigreene]

he plays a shell game damn  This "negro science"

[mishigreene]

he plays a shell game damn

[mishigreene]

Just another Bill Gaede idiot clone.

[massimunex]

you are confusing yourself :( I for real thought u were just trolling

[YogiFromEU]

How does your approach work with 3 magnets, and not only 2?

[Rozettados25]

@YogiFromEU That’s A Good Question Sorry for the wait I have a another YouTube channel "my02cent" I'm having issues with this channel I will get back to you

[dty2dty2]

Sorry man, your logic error happened at 1:50. You had a 'like charges repel' scenario, with an 'A' and a blank, yet you wrote 'B' on the blank side (after a slight hesitation). All you have shown is that if you write 'B' on the blank side instead of the A written on that side in the original repulsion scenario, then all subsequent results look different from the standard. You can now write 'A' on all faces and conclude that 'likes both repel and attract'!

[Rozettados25]

@dty2dty2 "Sorry man, your logic error happened at 1:50" You Misinterpreted that third magnet is the control magnet for the Inverse rule. The Fourth magnet is the only magnet subject to Opposite Repel the other 3 magnets are subject to Opposite attract.

I didn’t make a mistake watch again you will see that I intended to label the forth magnet "Opposite repel" The inverse rule allow me to accurate label the.

[Rozettados25]

@Nab00o I’m glad you like it have you watched the Part 2 video yet?

[Nabo00o]

I cannot agree with you but I want to thank you because you helped me to look further in what the 'attraction' really is.

Can something occur from nothing? I don't believe so. There has to be 'something' which causes the force, something that acts in all fields....

[Nabo00o]

I do believe you are wrong sir. Every energy transformation principle we know about works on opposites. If we want the power of water motion we need height difference. If two objects moving relative to each other have different speeds, then there is potential kinetic energy between them.

Magnetic field potential, electric, gravity..... its all based on opposites.

"It is the contrasts that makes an image".

So I'm not so sure about your alternative to the common understanding of attraction...

[Rozettados25]

@Nabo00o "magnets, and magnetic field value are subjects to the inverse rule. The inverse is a type of conditional sentence in formal logic. Any conditional sentence has an inverse: the contrapositive of the converse. The inverse of is thus . For example, substituting propositions in natural language for logical variables, the inverse of the conditional proposition "If it's raining, then Sam will meet Jack at the movies." is "If it's not raining, then Sam will not meet Jack at the movies.".

[Nabo00o]

@Rozettados25

I think you are mixing philosophical ideas about what polarity and contrasts are with what potential and polarity on magnets are.

It still comes down to this: To have a force, you need two potentials of different values.

Two heights....

Two intensities of EM fields....

Saltwater pressure needs two different salt solutions....

Gas pressure needs two different pressures etc...

[Rozettados25]

@Nabo00o Magnets Only have attractive and Repulsive fields Attractive =X Repulsive =Y This is the accept way that it works X attract Y and Y attract X/ X repels X and Y repels Y. Inverse rule... X repels Y and Y repels X/ X attract X and Y Attract Y. Accept way that it works... South attract North and North attract South / South repels South and North repels North. Inverse rule... South repels North and North repels South / South attract South and North Attract North.

[Nabo00o]

Hehe, now you messed with my mind.... I'll have to get back to this :D

[neutronuiumalcamist]

move over dr michio kaku !!..

this man iz a genius !!..

just proves that you can learn many new and intresing thoery's !!..

[Amepz1]

LOL to the part with the phone ring.