There are no blackholes guys, it was just a theory or a concept. No one ever really discovered and studied blackholes in real life. Just imagine that not even light can escape. We have died long ago perhaps billions of years. Such non-sense guys. The only thing that the so called blackholes exist is because of the funds that the Government provides. The best example of this is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
actually everything you see there would be frozen as when you enter the event horizon all time stops for that object but the object that is in there is actually falling in while the third person observer sees everything frozen in time
@ZvloHD u wouldnt see anything because it's scape velocity is greater than the speed of light so light couldnt reach ur eyes... and if u saw things freezing in time the what if u kept looking at stuff going in... how would they pile up?
You people don't know wht ur talking about. Cameras would be obliterated before they obtained any useful information, and it would take thousands or even millions of years to get one to a black hole. Not that it would be possible with our current technology, anyway.
Black holes are invisible because when light crosses it's event horizon, it is sucked into the black hole also.
Everything outside the black holes orbit it like a normal star.
U wouldn't bump into anything in a black hole, because t
this is fake obv not scientist say it has the most gravatational force n nuffink is in there well how do they know if a camera never been in there there never a 100 percent sure dnt listen enjoy the little things in life
I wish that N.A.S.A. , could send the first camera, into a black hole.... but they shure couldnt send a human in there, because they would get deformed, and squished, and squeezed to death.... not a pleasent way to die ey?
@knifer4life27 the camera would be obliterated so fast anything that could have been seen would not be visible, remember black holes are literal holes in spacetime where not even light can escape its unthinkable gravity.
what the fuck is with youtube and simulation videos always having that loading thing on them the whole way through? only videos of specific animations or simulation videos do that stupid loading thingo all the time
this is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo real. there for, is a matter falles "sucked" in a black hole, it breaks to small atoms befor being sucked, so it is invisble to see in 0:20
You would not be able to see anything because to create a picture would take light from the object, or reflecting off the object, neither of which would escape.
if u could see something going into a blackhole, u would never be able to see it go all the way to the event horizon because the time dialation would make it appear to be slowing down and would eventually stop at the event horizon
Not a too realistic one - matter slowly spiraling downward will have to accelerate according to physics in order to maintain this slow pace of falling. Also it will be expanded to a circular ring of matter by the sheer forces... just as a hint. ;-)
That's what gravitational time dilation does. According to relativity, it actually would accelerate as it approached the center, but only from its point of view; it would appear to slow down from outside the black hole. If we could see the object beyond the event horizon, it would continue to appear to slow down and would take an infinite amount of time to reach the singularity.
So as far as relativity is concerned, this is probably pretty accurate.
Actually now that I look at it again I guess you are right - actually the matter accelerates during spiraling down, I just did not recognize it because afterwards it gets superposed by the effect you describe of course. I guess when I checked it it was just the time when it had the same speed as the surrounding matter. Still I think that the matterpacket would actually forced into a ring... ;-)
actually guys, this video of matter getting sucked into a black hole is very inacurrate. This never happens. Just go to wikipedia like I did and learn what really happens to matter when in the gravitational pull of a black hole.
what happens is that when u were observing it u would see an event horizon and the image to you and only u wud appear unique and stuck at the centre of the black hole this will be the same for others obseving too, this is because the light being reflected back at that close to a black hole would be held back and there would just be an image unique to your own inertial reference fram e in the black hole
Well my boyfriend must of left that comment coz i didnt do it.. but i do agree coz i remember watching some our world doc or something and it said that.. and i thought it was really werid. So ERM ... NO YOURSELF!
look... while the object gets closer to the center of the black hole it reaches the speed of light and time might even stop for that object but it still gets sucked in and after its gone it doesnt emit any light. so u cant tell me that you still see it after its gone.
It means, to find the energy of an object, multiply it's mass by the speed of light squared. E, being energy, =, i should hope you know, m, being mass, c, being light, and when 2 is right against mc, it means squared.
"E" is energy and it equals to all matter (MC2). ALL matter equals to energy. So, knowing that, it becomes only a "matter" of figuring which matter particles contain the most energies.
NOTE: Many ppl think that spoon bending is a psychic exercise, but REALLY, it deals purely in matter manipulation, by tapping into the common energies btween the conscious person and the inanimate metal spoon. Catching the impulse & twisting metal as if it were a paperclip (quickly). It works, too, btw!
Notice how the little blob slows down and turns a bit red, then fades away. as it gets closer gravity pulls harder on the photons (light) coming from the matter giving the illusion the matter is slowing down. slow so much it would seem to stop moving. the gravity would eventually pull so hard it effects lights wavelength, thus turning it red(called redshift). then gravity will pull the light inward.
Note its not actually what is happening, just what we perceive to be happening.
"you just said because they investigated it...it has merit.....that makes no sense"
Wait...what?
You think that the world's top physicists would investigate something that has NO merit? Then why investigate it? And how could they conclude that the LHC is unlikely to create micro black holes if they didn't carry out an inquiry into the matter in the first place?
You're beginning to sound like a troll, so I'm off.
Actually it does. Its just that they are so small that they would evaporate in 10-43 seconds. The Tevaton at Fermilab also can do this as well as cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
no...it doesn't...a micro black hole...to be a black hole...would need an energy of 10^19 GeV....the LHC only goes up to 14 TeV...and cosmic rays can only get up to a few 100 TeV....
it is calculated that you would need a particle collider with a diameter of 1000 light years to achieve this kind of energy
"Although the Standard Model of particle physics predicts that LHC energies are far too low to create black holes, some extensions of the Standard Model posit the existence of extra spatial dimensions, in which it would be possible to create micro black holes at the LHC at a rate on the order of one per second."
Giddings, Steven B. and Thomas, Scott D. (19 June 2001),
This is correct. It hasn't been proven either way as Quantum Gravity hasn't been perfected. Until that time, all possibilities must be explored. I don't know about you, but I think the possibility of manufacturing black holes on Earth, no matter how remotely small the possibility, should be investigated...
I doubt that the LHC will do anything untoward, its all scaremongering by the media. But they spent a large amount of time and money on researching the issue, so clearly it has merit.
The LHC DOES have the POTENTIAL to creat micro-holes, its just highly unlikely and even if it did, they'd vanish almost instantly.
you just said because they investigated it...it has merit.....that makes no sense....especially when their conclusion was that it couldn't...again...cosmic rays cannot even create black holes and they have much more energy
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why does the LHC wants to make a black hole. The LHC are villains and they want to destroy the world on purpose, why would they do this. On October 21st 2008 it collapsed into a micro black hole to give us a good look of how the big bang begin but by the time it sucks up the earth It'll probably be the 22nd century by then.
lol....it never "collapsed" it just had minor problems with the computers which were repaired shortly after....and micro black hole ? what the f***....the probability of a black hole is 10.000.000 to 1....do you really think it will happen ?if so give me reasons why you think that
if this is a vid of a black hole and it workings its wrong
if balck holes exist ( atleast we think its a black hole what we investigate ) than the things sucked into it are compressed so much due to the gravitational pressure which grows the closer you go. this compression is so huge that the object sends out energy in the form off a blinding flash ( that is what has been seen to happen to an object going into ( what we think ) a black hole ) to bad we cant go investigate it
wow. wat exactly comes out on the other side. just to think of that makes me wonder soo much about the universe nd what we dont know abou it cause its fukin huge like 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 times bigger than the milky way lol
ok to all you hobby physicists saying black holes are PROVEN do a little research into "dark energy stars".
it is an alternative theory to what some describe as "black holes". it is an arguably feasible theory which is slowly gaining more attention in theoretical physics and making some question your "proven" theory of black holes.
remember it's called THEORETICAL PHYSICS for a reason.
well, i researched and didn't find any matches for "dark energy stars". and million of scientists are saying the theory is correct that there is "a blackhole and it DOES attract anything that travels near it" its pretty much you and a couple of other people that belive you Vs me and millions of Astrologists.
they both study the universe so there isn't much difference. ai know how to use the internet. and i used wikipedia to search for your dark energy star. no matches were found.
Well if you want me to explain it then- Its only detected by machines that can notice the difference in gravitational pull in the universe- unless the thing filming it is a piece of Clever machinery then i doubt this is real. :)
ok, those of you saying we don't have proof, it's true, but it's close enough. you shouldn't go flaming on me because I made a mistake, I thought we had proof, but now that I've thought about it we obviously don't, but still, those of you who deny it are either ignorant or jsut want attention, though Idk why I rly care, it's possible they don't exist. though, saying it doesn't exist is like saying the LHC is gonna destroy the Earth
saying black holes dont exist is like saying that water makes me inmortal, it does not
watch?v=l8yN77SpreQ watch that and i hope you learn a little more :) (this is not a evil comment) just helping you get the whole picure. black holes exist but we dont know alot about them , we know they suck up stuff and light and on but we dono were it goes? does it evaperate? does it tranfer to another dimension? who knows. no one i suppose. exept the aliens maybe
I never said black holes don't exist, I said it's possible that they don't, but an extremely low chance that they don't exist. I wonder if they'll ever prove white holes to exist or not...?
there is 0% chance they dont exist why are you even saying that there is a chance they dont omg , we already have fucking proof of it jesus why do you even argue when ur so clearly wrong?
oh my god, random aggression! we don't truly have proof, there's a chance they don't exist, black holes are still completely theoretical, we haven't given full proof that black holes exist, because we can't see them. open your mind.
okej but lets say black holes dont exist, well call them.. white holes, now, these white holes suck down material correct? dont even fucking say no because it is and if ud take 20 min of your time, watch a science show or anything ud know that they SUCK FUCKING MATERIAL (and light and.. shit) 2. why do you presist on being wrong?
one more thing. why did you decide to make a big deal out of it? I mean seriously, it's a little matter of... well it isn't opinion, it's fact. we don't have true proof of black holes because we've never seen them, we only know where they are by studying their stars orbiting them, and the way they affect light. it's still all completely theoretical. and think of this, perhaps nothing can be proven? maybe everything here is just in our imaginations, and I'm talking to myself. nothing is real....
we can't see black holes wetawd, why do you think they coined the name 'black hole' for them? all we can see is their accretion disk. my god you're ignorant
Ok, dumbass, here's the deal. I didn't say they don't exist, I said there's a chance they don't exist, don't blow shit out of proportion. Second, we don't have any cold hard evidence, it's all theoretical. And if we do have proof, please, enlighten me.
One CANNOT see light or any form of matter falling into a black hole when the matter/light has passed beyond the event horizon.
Why?
Because even light cannot escape the grasp of the huge gravity field generated by the black hole. Why do you think that a singularity is called a black hole?
black holes exist in many areas. mainly in the center of glaxaies. what do u think is in the middle and giant star? dont be ignorant to facts and what u believe if true. do some research pal
well acculy.. Gas is in the star but the galaxies things are correct ( Stars may blow up and become black holes or dust that forms other suns but not inside them when they are switched on :d
well u made ur sentence say " black holes are inside giant stars" so you just typed wrong? :D anyway, black holes are awesome.. i wonder what purpuse they have in the universe.
no that is not what i said. i said black holes are at the center of galakies. then i asked what do you think is in the middle i giant star? i wasnt sayin that there is a star in the middle of a black hole i was askin does this dude think that there is a giant star at the center of galaxies. i didnt type it wrong, you read it wrong.
"black holes exist in many areas. mainly in the center of glaxaies. what do u think is in the middle and giant star? " and in the center of galaxies = big black hole, jerk
dude you fucking misinterpreted what i said again. stop trying to make yourself look smart because you are failing. when i asked what do you think is in the middle i was trying to make the dude look like an idiot because he said black holes dont exist. know what youre talking about before you say shit.
u could just say, I typed And instead of a you know. seriusly not even me fails at that spelling. and i truly suck, and no, im not trying to look " smart" why would i prove.. shit to random ppl who think they are smart on youtube, when what they have is just.. basic knowlage. like me
im watching vids to, right now, beyond einstine acculy but its easyer to type in a 10x10 window instead of this shit, so just add me if not, dont reply to this .
Hm, we're facing the same problem with this dannes22. He seems to want to argue with me too, saying he 'knows' we'll have colonized other planets and will have evolved. Strange that he's the only one on Earth that actually 'knows' that'll happen. Either he's the smartest guy in the universe, or he's the dumbest wannabe. Help me choose this, its hard to decide!
lol alot of ppl in science videos, future world (program on discovery channel)and more. know this, just loook. how many year have we been in the space program, now 2014 were are sending stuff (base parts) to the moon, how long do you think it will take (i estemate 50-200 years) until, we have a base on another planet) i mean just LISTEN TO WHAT IM TYPING RIGHT NOW : 100 years to get to the moon? you think we whont get to another planet in the next oh i dono, thousands of years? hm.
How bout you listen to me for a change. We've been talking about colonizing other planets, yes? hm. Think about this, matey. Whether we'll be able to set up bases (which you must be INSIDE of to survive) is not truly colonizing. If we were to colonize a planet which had the capabilities to support our life without oxygen filled structures, THAT would be colonizing. If you built a base so that you could survive, its more of 'visiting' the planet for a few months or years, rather than living there
well acculy, plans have been to move "bad enviorment" industrys to mars (in the future ofc..) and warm it up so ye. collonising other planets = planned. and i saw this on future world, discovery channel
nice, but i still fail to see how thats going to help colonize the planet. Mars is warm enough, it doesn't need any bad industries. It's warmer than Earth. And besides, what good is heating Mars going to do? Its not like there is any frozen water to melt (thats on the moon). Heck, theres no sign of water left on Mars anyway. Only proof that there WAS water, was that they think they might have found ancient remains of a bacteria.
stingray, mars is not warmer than earth. that's one of its main problems. probably the 3 main problems with colonizing mars is water, atmosphere, and temperature. and they sent a probe to mars and dug up some ice, so yeah, they found water under the soil. well, technically ice, but still...
really? I thought they said that they found evidence for water, by finding fossilized bacteria, or something like that. thank you for the new information, mightyling. But would you agree that putting the global warming effects from Earth on Mars isn't going to help? We might cause the same negative effects, if not worse. Am I correct?
Admit I'm wrong? I don't remember hearing any solid proof of your insignificant information. Until we set foot on a planet that can be habitable without the use of human "environment bases", I will not agree with you. Perhaps it's time for you to admit YOUR wrong? You, nor I, nor anyone on this Earth knows we will colonize other planets. Period.
I might look it up, but the Discovery Channel does not have SOLID PROOF. If we haven't colonized planets YET, then its not PROVEN that we will! Until we step foot on a planet and can actually survive on it, theorys and plans from any scientist, t.v. channel or institution doesn't mean anything! They're called 'plans' for a reason. If they are planned, then that means it might NOT work. Not everything that is planned to work out fine does work out fine. Get my picture?
it is IMPOSSIBLE for them not to exist jesus fucking christ we have proof that they exist thats all im fucking saying how can you even argue with that?
theres tons of proof they do exist.. just awser this question: why do you argue with the existence of black holes, when your clearly wrong ( please tell me how they dont exist and evry scientist in the world. you'll even get a noble price)
LOL I wonder how many times people are gonna call you an idiot. we have proof of black holes. stars near the center of most galaxies move faster than they're supposed to, because of a black hole. a star wouldn't cause this, but a black hole spins about 99.9% the speed of light, which, in turn, would cause stars to orbit extremely fast near the center
Theoretical does /not/ mean inconclusive, contrary to what you might think. A scientific theory is a congregation of observable facts, to support an idea, and that can be tested to high accuracy. Scientific Laws are simply Theories that have been tested so rigorously, that they're accepted as fact, like the law of gravity.
Black holes do exist. We've located them by the tell-tale signature of X-ray emissions they give off. There's a ton of evidence; look it up!
Ha This footage is not real you cannot actually see the black hole because the light is bent into it from the gravity but if it were true the object would not appear to move at all until it is actually destroyed at the point of mass density and nothing will be able to pass through it just becuase of "spagittifacation" (steven hawking term for distorted to destruction) as well as the gravity is so strong the even the earth would be turn to the size of less than dust
well u cant really.. se the black hole. you se the material around it watch?v=l8yN77SpreQ just watch this ^^ it will explain it all :)short and informetive
My name is Austin and I attend at UCLA on my 2nd year. I major in astronomy. I believe the matter which fell into the center of the black hole disappeared and traveled to the other side. Its still not scientifically proven but many scientist believe it be a rip in time allowing certain objects travel through time.
Yeah. Black holes are basically just stars that collapse under they're own gravity and pull in any matter for tremendous distances. The gravity black holes enforce is unbelievable. Not even light escapes it. The only way we can truly see black holes is with the telescopes that read radiation signatures. Good thing to know our yellow dwarf won't do that. Bad thing to know that our yellow dwarf will expand into a red giant and consume all terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars).
Exactly, there isn't much of anything we can do to prevent man kinds extinction, unless we develope the technology to travel to habitable planets farther from our star.
Erm...not really burned man. When our Yellow Dwarf changes from the Main Sequence Stage to the next, which would make it a Red Giant, it will literally "consume" the terrestrial planets. Sure, it'll definatly burn the rock planets, but after that, it will swallow them up. Our planet, along with Mercury, Venus, and Mars, won't be here when our star is finally a Red Giant. I guess you could say our planets would be "part" of the Sun.
well it will get burned first hmm? we would burn to death first, but i saw a science program, its new not old rly, they sayed that the earth would change postiosion since its expanding but i mean we cant prove it until were there. so this is fucking pointless hm?
Well, the position of the Earth could change, but its not likely. Add in the equation of how fast the Sun would become a Red Giant...far faster than the Earth could move away from it. We'd be a part of the star well under an hour of it beginning to expand. This might be pointless, but it just made it so much more pointless for you to reply to my comment and say that, when it could have been ended at that point.
Well, we actually don't know if we would have colonized planets by then. We might not even be alive when our star expands. Its possible, however very unlikely. Oh, and about your talk of a blackhole...when your near a blackhole, your basically just...how do i say this in one simple word...Dead. I don't think time would stop, because time continues to go on, even as other things are destroyed in unimaginable ways. And they don't necessarily 'suck' up light...they use gravity, just like Earth.
they do suck light, but only in the eventhorizon , and we will have conolised another planet/with other star/ how many years did it take to send a man to the moon after we started the space program hmm?and u think we whont do anymore evolving in the coming.. thousands of years? hm?
Ah, one thing I've noticed about you: you like to say "hm". So do I! Hm...whether we've sent human beings to the Moon or not, does not state that we will definately be colonizing other planets. The best thing we can come to of a planet to survive on (thats like Earth with water and land) is far beyond our system.
lol they are even gona send out stuff 2014 i think it was to the moon " lunar base" we will conolise other planets. how long did it take us to get to the moon, think about that
It's nice and all that we might be able to colonize the moon, but the moon isn't a planet, is it? Admit it dude, we DON'T know that we'll colonize other planets. Never say something WILL happen, because we never know what could happen to prevent that. When we talk about colonizing other planets, we mean planets that contain the right supplies. We don't mean a place you can carry habitation 'bases' (like the lunar base). No planets in our solar sytem that we know of are habitable. Only moons.
lol, thats what I was saying. We'd truly be colonizing if we were able to survive on a planet without the use of technology, but obviously we need that tech to survive on the moon or any so far discovered planets in the solar system.
Travel through time, do you mean that due to the fact that time is being "warped" the amount of time on earth that passes say... 100 years... the matter that goes thru a black hole will have not aged?
My question may not makes sense but it's the only way i can interpret it.
This has been flagged as spam show
There are no blackholes guys, it was just a theory or a concept. No one ever really discovered and studied blackholes in real life. Just imagine that not even light can escape. We have died long ago perhaps billions of years. Such non-sense guys. The only thing that the so called blackholes exist is because of the funds that the Government provides. The best example of this is the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
pogpog28 3 months ago
if the redshift is real and not added in then thats sweet as hell. if its computerized color imaging then thats a bummer
swangooo 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What happens when the irresistible force meets the immovable object?
pogpog28 3 months ago
Comment removed
pogpog28 3 months ago
Too Bad!
MRmkay9876543210 4 months ago
Bro they then or me how ever you put it ah Im coming back home APS Dont it make you wont 2 die Go back 2 where its at? ha
MarkRipleysPage 5 months ago
actually everything you see there would be frozen as when you enter the event horizon all time stops for that object but the object that is in there is actually falling in while the third person observer sees everything frozen in time
ZvloHD 5 months ago
@ZvloHD u wouldnt see anything because it's scape velocity is greater than the speed of light so light couldnt reach ur eyes... and if u saw things freezing in time the what if u kept looking at stuff going in... how would they pile up?
davidsaso1234 4 months ago
Yup, that's how it happens last I checked.
synnr666 6 months ago
it should of have slowed down more before it disappeared on the visible spectrum due to gravitational redshifting
debunker1905 7 months ago
universes longest slide lol
NOMOETOE 8 months ago
(cont.) time would be greatly slowed and u would be ripped into individual atoms along with everything else that fell into a black hole.
Micool777 9 months ago
You people don't know wht ur talking about. Cameras would be obliterated before they obtained any useful information, and it would take thousands or even millions of years to get one to a black hole. Not that it would be possible with our current technology, anyway.
Black holes are invisible because when light crosses it's event horizon, it is sucked into the black hole also.
Everything outside the black holes orbit it like a normal star.
U wouldn't bump into anything in a black hole, because t
Micool777 9 months ago
this is fake obv not scientist say it has the most gravatational force n nuffink is in there well how do they know if a camera never been in there there never a 100 percent sure dnt listen enjoy the little things in life
Aerenmerksmw2 10 months ago
I wish that N.A.S.A. , could send the first camera, into a black hole.... but they shure couldnt send a human in there, because they would get deformed, and squished, and squeezed to death.... not a pleasent way to die ey?
knifer4life27 10 months ago
@knifer4life27 the camera would be obliterated so fast anything that could have been seen would not be visible, remember black holes are literal holes in spacetime where not even light can escape its unthinkable gravity.
McGiggitygoo 10 months ago
Same thing as a whirlpool.
halomaster22323 1 year ago
these nigger holes, stolling even light for only themselves. tsc tsc
hiorantakeshi 1 year ago
what the fuck is with youtube and simulation videos always having that loading thing on them the whole way through? only videos of specific animations or simulation videos do that stupid loading thingo all the time
super6plx 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@super6plx
WHETHER OR NOT YOU BELIEVE IN GOD,
HOLY SHIT PEOPLE , NEW AMAZING FUCKING DISCOVERY
GO TO YOUTUBE USER : XKUNX
NEW PLANET FOUND SEPTEMBER 29 2010 THAT SCIENTISTS SAY IS NEAR 100% CHANCE TO SUPPORT LIFE
WATER FOUND, TEMPERATURES THE SAME AS EARTH
THUMBS UP TO SUPPORT AND GET AWARENESS OUT THERE
THIS IS HOT STUFF
TribalRapper 1 year ago
this is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo real. there for, is a matter falles "sucked" in a black hole, it breaks to small atoms befor being sucked, so it is invisble to see in 0:20
BoyArmor 1 year ago
imagine (if possible) falling into a black hole and bumping into all that invisible junk
jeremyistwocool 1 year ago
I guess it doesn't matter anymore... lol
Blue2Scripter 1 year ago 4
@Blue2Scripter
Ha!! i get the joke.....
ShadowKNighT788 1 year ago
@Blue2Scripter lmao im so sad to find that funny :/
MEareCAT 1 year ago
I do not think there is no matter in the dark area of black holes, but gravity does not allow any light to reflect off of them to be seen.
AUX999 1 year ago
You would not be able to see anything because to create a picture would take light from the object, or reflecting off the object, neither of which would escape.
AUX999 1 year ago
if u could see something going into a blackhole, u would never be able to see it go all the way to the event horizon because the time dialation would make it appear to be slowing down and would eventually stop at the event horizon
brownie003 1 year ago
"african american" holes... not black holes you racists
stprimeflyer 1 year ago 111
@stprimeflyer lol
BLEACH43VER 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer lmfao!
MEareCAT 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer lmfao!
REDTEAM22003 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer It's not called racist (I know your joking) Racist is when you treat another race differently
MrNoSpoone 1 year ago
@MrNoSpoone Racism is the belief that one race is inherently superior to all others.
CharlieWhitesWig 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer or negro holes if you prefer :D
hardraver909 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer haha
holyawe2 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer <--- I gotta go with this guy, this video is RACIST AS HELL!
Inglorious891 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer you just made my day
Daavoid 1 year ago
@stprimeflyer how do u know its american? hmmmm
liamyloo 2 months ago
Toilet?
Edge3x 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Black Holes
Allah said: So verily, I swear by the (Al-Khunnas Al-Jware Al-kunnas)
Quran 81 v 15-16
The meaning of words
Al-Khunnas: the disappeared
Al-Jware: move swiftly
Al-kunnas: the sweeper
Tofy710 1 year ago
Not a too realistic one - matter slowly spiraling downward will have to accelerate according to physics in order to maintain this slow pace of falling. Also it will be expanded to a circular ring of matter by the sheer forces... just as a hint. ;-)
TheRobotMarvin 2 years ago
That's what gravitational time dilation does. According to relativity, it actually would accelerate as it approached the center, but only from its point of view; it would appear to slow down from outside the black hole. If we could see the object beyond the event horizon, it would continue to appear to slow down and would take an infinite amount of time to reach the singularity.
So as far as relativity is concerned, this is probably pretty accurate.
corpssnare 2 years ago
Actually now that I look at it again I guess you are right - actually the matter accelerates during spiraling down, I just did not recognize it because afterwards it gets superposed by the effect you describe of course. I guess when I checked it it was just the time when it had the same speed as the surrounding matter. Still I think that the matterpacket would actually forced into a ring... ;-)
TheRobotMarvin 2 years ago
It looks scary, I expected a screamer...
mettalx1 2 years ago
dymn!!!!!!! that's exactly what happens everyday in my toilet!!!!!!!! micro black hole!
Guatemalanfatkid 2 years ago 2
actually guys, this video of matter getting sucked into a black hole is very inacurrate. This never happens. Just go to wikipedia like I did and learn what really happens to matter when in the gravitational pull of a black hole.
PureInsanity00 2 years ago
what happens is that when u were observing it u would see an event horizon and the image to you and only u wud appear unique and stuck at the centre of the black hole this will be the same for others obseving too, this is because the light being reflected back at that close to a black hole would be held back and there would just be an image unique to your own inertial reference fram e in the black hole
DomhnallX50 2 years ago
precisely...
:)
PureInsanity00 2 years ago
wikipedia is just as inaccurate as this. seriously
ClubPenguinFan8 2 years ago 2
woah, I made this video yeaaars ago. Where did you find it man?
zeinin 2 years ago
I see this "black hole" every day when i draw off water in the toilet.
0GunnyBunny0 2 years ago 36
hahaha LMAO XD
wichinski 2 years ago
Yeah! LMFAO!!!
Carking18 2 years ago
In real life you wouldn't see it disappear because time would stop for that object
Marmitefrog 2 years ago
erm... no.
str0m 2 years ago
Well my boyfriend must of left that comment coz i didnt do it.. but i do agree coz i remember watching some our world doc or something and it said that.. and i thought it was really werid. So ERM ... NO YOURSELF!
Marmitefrog 2 years ago
look... while the object gets closer to the center of the black hole it reaches the speed of light and time might even stop for that object but it still gets sucked in and after its gone it doesnt emit any light. so u cant tell me that you still see it after its gone.
str0m 2 years ago
Yes it true
ukulel 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
E=mc2 in the center of black hole we woldnt se dispare object
ukulel 2 years ago
I'd like you to explain E=mc2 to me. I know its an answer, and I know Einstein worked on it - but explain exactly what it is.
paullnewlands 2 years ago
it basically says that energy and mass are both different manifestations of the same thing.
drone713 2 years ago
It means, to find the energy of an object, multiply it's mass by the speed of light squared. E, being energy, =, i should hope you know, m, being mass, c, being light, and when 2 is right against mc, it means squared.
kwongo1 2 years ago
"E" is energy and it equals to all matter (MC2). ALL matter equals to energy. So, knowing that, it becomes only a "matter" of figuring which matter particles contain the most energies.
NOTE: Many ppl think that spoon bending is a psychic exercise, but REALLY, it deals purely in matter manipulation, by tapping into the common energies btween the conscious person and the inanimate metal spoon. Catching the impulse & twisting metal as if it were a paperclip (quickly). It works, too, btw!
MarcusDarling4026 2 years ago
Notice how the little blob slows down and turns a bit red, then fades away. as it gets closer gravity pulls harder on the photons (light) coming from the matter giving the illusion the matter is slowing down. slow so much it would seem to stop moving. the gravity would eventually pull so hard it effects lights wavelength, thus turning it red(called redshift). then gravity will pull the light inward.
Note its not actually what is happening, just what we perceive to be happening.
technicalsuport 2 years ago
WOW, how scientific! did you use some kind of crazy physics theorem to create this pos? I'm so impressed!!!
JayDay111 2 years ago
"you just said because they investigated it...it has merit.....that makes no sense"
Wait...what?
You think that the world's top physicists would investigate something that has NO merit? Then why investigate it? And how could they conclude that the LHC is unlikely to create micro black holes if they didn't carry out an inquiry into the matter in the first place?
You're beginning to sound like a troll, so I'm off.
Jarls 2 years ago
no we can't create one...most physicists agree that even the LHC doesn't have enough energy to create one.
spike0804 2 years ago
Actually it does. Its just that they are so small that they would evaporate in 10-43 seconds. The Tevaton at Fermilab also can do this as well as cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere.
Jarls 2 years ago
no...it doesn't...a micro black hole...to be a black hole...would need an energy of 10^19 GeV....the LHC only goes up to 14 TeV...and cosmic rays can only get up to a few 100 TeV....
it is calculated that you would need a particle collider with a diameter of 1000 light years to achieve this kind of energy
spike0804 2 years ago
"Although the Standard Model of particle physics predicts that LHC energies are far too low to create black holes, some extensions of the Standard Model posit the existence of extra spatial dimensions, in which it would be possible to create micro black holes at the LHC at a rate on the order of one per second."
Giddings, Steven B. and Thomas, Scott D. (19 June 2001),
Research ftw.
Jarls 2 years ago
so...some exotic extensions might mean extra spatial dimensions which might mean its possible to create micro black holes
spike0804 2 years ago
This is correct. It hasn't been proven either way as Quantum Gravity hasn't been perfected. Until that time, all possibilities must be explored. I don't know about you, but I think the possibility of manufacturing black holes on Earth, no matter how remotely small the possibility, should be investigated...
Jarls 2 years ago
they have investigated....and they said no.
what is the problem? they are physicists..not...high school students or something..
spike0804 2 years ago
I doubt that the LHC will do anything untoward, its all scaremongering by the media. But they spent a large amount of time and money on researching the issue, so clearly it has merit.
The LHC DOES have the POTENTIAL to creat micro-holes, its just highly unlikely and even if it did, they'd vanish almost instantly.
Jarls 2 years ago
fail at logic...
you just said because they investigated it...it has merit.....that makes no sense....especially when their conclusion was that it couldn't...again...cosmic rays cannot even create black holes and they have much more energy
spike0804 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why does the LHC wants to make a black hole. The LHC are villains and they want to destroy the world on purpose, why would they do this. On October 21st 2008 it collapsed into a micro black hole to give us a good look of how the big bang begin but by the time it sucks up the earth It'll probably be the 22nd century by then.
mqg96 2 years ago
what the fuck are you talking about...
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago 2
Read my comment more carefully instead of lazilly and you'll find out!
mqg96 2 years ago
lol you still make no sense.
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago 2
lol....it never "collapsed" it just had minor problems with the computers which were repaired shortly after....and micro black hole ? what the f***....the probability of a black hole is 10.000.000 to 1....do you really think it will happen ?if so give me reasons why you think that
WhiVe87 2 years ago
i heard there was a massive overload in the golden superconductors that surrounds the rings that caused the LHC to shut down.
mrcresent 2 years ago
you heard wrong...there were never major problems....
WhiVe87 2 years ago
Kinda sounds like the probability of me winning the lottery lol ;)
OiiiMate 2 years ago
yeah, this was obviously cg, you wouldn't be able to see it happening anyways there is no light near a black hole.
scojomasta 2 years ago
if this is a vid of a black hole and it workings its wrong
if balck holes exist ( atleast we think its a black hole what we investigate ) than the things sucked into it are compressed so much due to the gravitational pressure which grows the closer you go. this compression is so huge that the object sends out energy in the form off a blinding flash ( that is what has been seen to happen to an object going into ( what we think ) a black hole ) to bad we cant go investigate it
draga1990 2 years ago
its called Astrophysical research. aactually,,
00Carly2012 3 years ago
wow. wat exactly comes out on the other side. just to think of that makes me wonder soo much about the universe nd what we dont know abou it cause its fukin huge like 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 times bigger than the milky way lol
liljetad 3 years ago
ok to all you hobby physicists saying black holes are PROVEN do a little research into "dark energy stars".
it is an alternative theory to what some describe as "black holes". it is an arguably feasible theory which is slowly gaining more attention in theoretical physics and making some question your "proven" theory of black holes.
remember it's called THEORETICAL PHYSICS for a reason.
2spacci1duro5 3 years ago
well, i researched and didn't find any matches for "dark energy stars". and million of scientists are saying the theory is correct that there is "a blackhole and it DOES attract anything that travels near it" its pretty much you and a couple of other people that belive you Vs me and millions of Astrologists.
Runies1 3 years ago
maybe you should google the difference between astrologists and astronomers as well as it seems you don't know the difference.
all you have to do is google dark energy stars.. i just tried and it brings up a wikipedia page and countless other articles.
good luck figuring out how to use the internet
2spacci1duro5 3 years ago
they both study the universe so there isn't much difference. ai know how to use the internet. and i used wikipedia to search for your dark energy star. no matches were found.
Runies1 3 years ago
Well if you want me to explain it then- Its only detected by machines that can notice the difference in gravitational pull in the universe- unless the thing filming it is a piece of Clever machinery then i doubt this is real. :)
00Carly2012 3 years ago
The biggest Black Hole found has the mass of 18 Billion times the Mass of our sun. Now,, we are talking big numbers.
RayetWolf 3 years ago
You cant actually see a black hole in real life- idiot.
00Carly2012 3 years ago
Care to explain it then to him instead of flaming him? Thank you.
dannes22 3 years ago
to much research in one night i will now sleep in stress. galaxy's collisions, how the melky way will end. how the world will end....to much!!!!
stunt509 3 years ago
ok, those of you saying we don't have proof, it's true, but it's close enough. you shouldn't go flaming on me because I made a mistake, I thought we had proof, but now that I've thought about it we obviously don't, but still, those of you who deny it are either ignorant or jsut want attention, though Idk why I rly care, it's possible they don't exist. though, saying it doesn't exist is like saying the LHC is gonna destroy the Earth
mightyling 3 years ago
saying black holes dont exist is like saying that water makes me inmortal, it does not
watch?v=l8yN77SpreQ watch that and i hope you learn a little more :) (this is not a evil comment) just helping you get the whole picure. black holes exist but we dont know alot about them , we know they suck up stuff and light and on but we dono were it goes? does it evaperate? does it tranfer to another dimension? who knows. no one i suppose. exept the aliens maybe
dannes22 3 years ago
I never said black holes don't exist, I said it's possible that they don't, but an extremely low chance that they don't exist. I wonder if they'll ever prove white holes to exist or not...?
mightyling 3 years ago
there is 0% chance they dont exist why are you even saying that there is a chance they dont omg , we already have fucking proof of it jesus why do you even argue when ur so clearly wrong?
dannes22 3 years ago
oh my god, random aggression! we don't truly have proof, there's a chance they don't exist, black holes are still completely theoretical, we haven't given full proof that black holes exist, because we can't see them. open your mind.
mightyling 3 years ago
wow ur just... gosh. your so.. fucking stupid. sorry for my language but 1. no its not all theoretical.2.this aint random :)
dannes22 3 years ago
okej but lets say black holes dont exist, well call them.. white holes, now, these white holes suck down material correct? dont even fucking say no because it is and if ud take 20 min of your time, watch a science show or anything ud know that they SUCK FUCKING MATERIAL (and light and.. shit) 2. why do you presist on being wrong?
dannes22 3 years ago
one more thing. why did you decide to make a big deal out of it? I mean seriously, it's a little matter of... well it isn't opinion, it's fact. we don't have true proof of black holes because we've never seen them, we only know where they are by studying their stars orbiting them, and the way they affect light. it's still all completely theoretical. and think of this, perhaps nothing can be proven? maybe everything here is just in our imaginations, and I'm talking to myself. nothing is real....
mightyling 3 years ago
YES im so sorry, me and evry scienttist /person in the world are wrong, your right.
havent seen them, haha ur hularius i mean.. do you even read what ur typing, now since it dont matther, dont fucking care to reply.
dannes22 3 years ago
we can't see black holes wetawd, why do you think they coined the name 'black hole' for them? all we can see is their accretion disk. my god you're ignorant
mightyling 3 years ago
Heard of x-ray ?
dannes22 3 years ago
Ok, dumbass, here's the deal. I didn't say they don't exist, I said there's a chance they don't exist, don't blow shit out of proportion. Second, we don't have any cold hard evidence, it's all theoretical. And if we do have proof, please, enlighten me.
mightyling 3 years ago
last thing
2spacci1duro5 (3 weeks ago) there is no proof you dumb ass... everything we know about black holes is completely theoretical.
nothing that far out in space can be proven until we have the means to travel there and conduct tests and see some pseudo-"tangible" evidence.
this was said to me, and it's completely correct
mightyling 3 years ago
One CANNOT see light or any form of matter falling into a black hole when the matter/light has passed beyond the event horizon.
Why?
Because even light cannot escape the grasp of the huge gravity field generated by the black hole. Why do you think that a singularity is called a black hole?
hermsen1977 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who the fuck came up with so much bullshit...black holes dont exsist in other words prove it
RunFlip 3 years ago
black holes exist in many areas. mainly in the center of glaxaies. what do u think is in the middle and giant star? dont be ignorant to facts and what u believe if true. do some research pal
weirdkid5 3 years ago
well acculy.. Gas is in the star but the galaxies things are correct ( Stars may blow up and become black holes or dust that forms other suns but not inside them when they are switched on :d
dannes22 3 years ago
i know this
weirdkid5 3 years ago
well u made ur sentence say " black holes are inside giant stars" so you just typed wrong? :D anyway, black holes are awesome.. i wonder what purpuse they have in the universe.
Evrything is connected '.'
dannes22 3 years ago
no that is not what i said. i said black holes are at the center of galakies. then i asked what do you think is in the middle i giant star? i wasnt sayin that there is a star in the middle of a black hole i was askin does this dude think that there is a giant star at the center of galaxies. i didnt type it wrong, you read it wrong.
weirdkid5 3 years ago
lol... we know.. whats inside.. a star... black holes, stars that colapse on they'r own gravity, Supernova = just a "smaller" star
dannes22 3 years ago
dude holy shit I KNOW
weirdkid5 3 years ago
then why the fuck did u botther asking me, lol
"black holes exist in many areas. mainly in the center of glaxaies. what do u think is in the middle and giant star? " and in the center of galaxies = big black hole, jerk
dannes22 3 years ago
dude you fucking misinterpreted what i said again. stop trying to make yourself look smart because you are failing. when i asked what do you think is in the middle i was trying to make the dude look like an idiot because he said black holes dont exist. know what youre talking about before you say shit.
weirdkid5 3 years ago
u could just say, I typed And instead of a you know. seriusly not even me fails at that spelling. and i truly suck, and no, im not trying to look " smart" why would i prove.. shit to random ppl who think they are smart on youtube, when what they have is just.. basic knowlage. like me
i barly pass school for crying out load.
dannes22 3 years ago
you barley pass school? gee you do fail.
weirdkid5 3 years ago
well.. math really i liked the physics part :) whats ur point, that me the only person in the world Barly made school, holy shit im a freak right?
dannes22 3 years ago
XD youre argument is invalid my friend.
weirdkid5 3 years ago
oh no :( why dont you just add my msn and argue with me? we are taking space (O_O) dingo__dingo @ hotmail . c o m
ill be waiting:)
dannes22 3 years ago
dude your actually gonna waste your time to argue with me? im trying to watch damn videos. you must have nothing better to do O.o
weirdkid5 3 years ago
im watching vids to, right now, beyond einstine acculy but its easyer to type in a 10x10 window instead of this shit, so just add me if not, dont reply to this .
dannes22 3 years ago
well i did. but you seem to be offline :/
weirdkid5 3 years ago
Hm, we're facing the same problem with this dannes22. He seems to want to argue with me too, saying he 'knows' we'll have colonized other planets and will have evolved. Strange that he's the only one on Earth that actually 'knows' that'll happen. Either he's the smartest guy in the universe, or he's the dumbest wannabe. Help me choose this, its hard to decide!
MTStingray 3 years ago
fart
weirdkid5 3 years ago
Hm, a wise decision indeed! lol
MTStingray 3 years ago
exactly
weirdkid5 3 years ago
lol
MTStingray 3 years ago
:D....
weirdkid5 3 years ago
lol alot of ppl in science videos, future world (program on discovery channel)and more. know this, just loook. how many year have we been in the space program, now 2014 were are sending stuff (base parts) to the moon, how long do you think it will take (i estemate 50-200 years) until, we have a base on another planet) i mean just LISTEN TO WHAT IM TYPING RIGHT NOW : 100 years to get to the moon? you think we whont get to another planet in the next oh i dono, thousands of years? hm.
dannes22 3 years ago
How bout you listen to me for a change. We've been talking about colonizing other planets, yes? hm. Think about this, matey. Whether we'll be able to set up bases (which you must be INSIDE of to survive) is not truly colonizing. If we were to colonize a planet which had the capabilities to support our life without oxygen filled structures, THAT would be colonizing. If you built a base so that you could survive, its more of 'visiting' the planet for a few months or years, rather than living there
MTStingray 3 years ago
well acculy, plans have been to move "bad enviorment" industrys to mars (in the future ofc..) and warm it up so ye. collonising other planets = planned. and i saw this on future world, discovery channel
dannes22 3 years ago
nice, but i still fail to see how thats going to help colonize the planet. Mars is warm enough, it doesn't need any bad industries. It's warmer than Earth. And besides, what good is heating Mars going to do? Its not like there is any frozen water to melt (thats on the moon). Heck, theres no sign of water left on Mars anyway. Only proof that there WAS water, was that they think they might have found ancient remains of a bacteria.
MTStingray 3 years ago
stingray, mars is not warmer than earth. that's one of its main problems. probably the 3 main problems with colonizing mars is water, atmosphere, and temperature. and they sent a probe to mars and dug up some ice, so yeah, they found water under the soil. well, technically ice, but still...
mightyling 3 years ago
really? I thought they said that they found evidence for water, by finding fossilized bacteria, or something like that. thank you for the new information, mightyling. But would you agree that putting the global warming effects from Earth on Mars isn't going to help? We might cause the same negative effects, if not worse. Am I correct?
MTStingray 3 years ago
cant admit your wrong huh? lol and then u change ur own opinion about it(comment bellow) wtf dude
dannes22 3 years ago
Admit I'm wrong? I don't remember hearing any solid proof of your insignificant information. Until we set foot on a planet that can be habitable without the use of human "environment bases", I will not agree with you. Perhaps it's time for you to admit YOUR wrong? You, nor I, nor anyone on this Earth knows we will colonize other planets. Period.
MTStingray 3 years ago
i've already sayed that i watched it on discovery channel, future worlds. look it UP
dannes22 3 years ago
I might look it up, but the Discovery Channel does not have SOLID PROOF. If we haven't colonized planets YET, then its not PROVEN that we will! Until we step foot on a planet and can actually survive on it, theorys and plans from any scientist, t.v. channel or institution doesn't mean anything! They're called 'plans' for a reason. If they are planned, then that means it might NOT work. Not everything that is planned to work out fine does work out fine. Get my picture?
MTStingray 3 years ago
Oh, and what opinion did I change?
MTStingray 3 years ago
nothing that .. was another dude with simiular name, sorry bout that
dannes22 3 years ago
ah, k
MTStingray 3 years ago
lol, he's telling me that black holes aren't at all theoretical, and that it's impossible for them to not exist, lolz... intervention time!
mightyling 3 years ago
Thinks knows everything. Yes, I know, lol. Well, you have three choices: A) Deal with him yourself, B) Ignore him, or C) Call in reinforcements (me).
MTStingray 3 years ago
it is IMPOSSIBLE for them not to exist jesus fucking christ we have proof that they exist thats all im fucking saying how can you even argue with that?
theres tons of proof they do exist.. just awser this question: why do you argue with the existence of black holes, when your clearly wrong ( please tell me how they dont exist and evry scientist in the world. you'll even get a noble price)
dannes22 3 years ago
LOL I wonder how many times people are gonna call you an idiot. we have proof of black holes. stars near the center of most galaxies move faster than they're supposed to, because of a black hole. a star wouldn't cause this, but a black hole spins about 99.9% the speed of light, which, in turn, would cause stars to orbit extremely fast near the center
mightyling 3 years ago
there is no proof you dumb ass... everything we know about black holes is completely theoretical.
nothing that far out in space can be proven until we have the means to travel there and conduct tests and see some pseudo-"tangible" evidence.
2spacci1duro5 3 years ago
Theoretical does /not/ mean inconclusive, contrary to what you might think. A scientific theory is a congregation of observable facts, to support an idea, and that can be tested to high accuracy. Scientific Laws are simply Theories that have been tested so rigorously, that they're accepted as fact, like the law of gravity.
Black holes do exist. We've located them by the tell-tale signature of X-ray emissions they give off. There's a ton of evidence; look it up!
sirkamon 3 years ago
watch this watch?v=l8yN77SpreQ
dannes22 3 years ago
the sun is not massive enough to be a blackhole sheezz -_-
jamezzter14 3 years ago
Ha This footage is not real you cannot actually see the black hole because the light is bent into it from the gravity but if it were true the object would not appear to move at all until it is actually destroyed at the point of mass density and nothing will be able to pass through it just becuase of "spagittifacation" (steven hawking term for distorted to destruction) as well as the gravity is so strong the even the earth would be turn to the size of less than dust
sessi249 3 years ago
Duh, this is a simulation xD And they can be seen, with X-rays
Tinyblade109 3 years ago
well u cant really.. se the black hole. you se the material around it watch?v=l8yN77SpreQ just watch this ^^ it will explain it all :)short and informetive
dannes22 3 years ago
My name is Austin and I attend at UCLA on my 2nd year. I major in astronomy. I believe the matter which fell into the center of the black hole disappeared and traveled to the other side. Its still not scientifically proven but many scientist believe it be a rip in time allowing certain objects travel through time.
Austindiaz19 3 years ago
Isnt a black hole actaully just a spherical collapsed star but jus impossibly dense?
mediageneration65 3 years ago
Yeah. Black holes are basically just stars that collapse under they're own gravity and pull in any matter for tremendous distances. The gravity black holes enforce is unbelievable. Not even light escapes it. The only way we can truly see black holes is with the telescopes that read radiation signatures. Good thing to know our yellow dwarf won't do that. Bad thing to know that our yellow dwarf will expand into a red giant and consume all terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars).
MTStingray 3 years ago
Yea, but what are you going to do eh?
mediageneration65 3 years ago
Exactly, there isn't much of anything we can do to prevent man kinds extinction, unless we develope the technology to travel to habitable planets farther from our star.
MTStingray 3 years ago
acculy earth whont be swallowed.. but it will be burned :) but thats.. far from now
dannes22 3 years ago
Erm...not really burned man. When our Yellow Dwarf changes from the Main Sequence Stage to the next, which would make it a Red Giant, it will literally "consume" the terrestrial planets. Sure, it'll definatly burn the rock planets, but after that, it will swallow them up. Our planet, along with Mercury, Venus, and Mars, won't be here when our star is finally a Red Giant. I guess you could say our planets would be "part" of the Sun.
MTStingray 3 years ago
well it will get burned first hmm? we would burn to death first, but i saw a science program, its new not old rly, they sayed that the earth would change postiosion since its expanding but i mean we cant prove it until were there. so this is fucking pointless hm?
dannes22 3 years ago
Well, the position of the Earth could change, but its not likely. Add in the equation of how fast the Sun would become a Red Giant...far faster than the Earth could move away from it. We'd be a part of the star well under an hour of it beginning to expand. This might be pointless, but it just made it so much more pointless for you to reply to my comment and say that, when it could have been ended at that point.
MTStingray 3 years ago
indeed but that will be a while, an Really long time... WERRY LONG TIME. we will have conolised other planets by then for shure.
And i rather have a blackhole, wounder what "happens" when you come near a black hole, maybe time stops? gravity - time? it sucks up light dont it?
dannes22 3 years ago
Well, we actually don't know if we would have colonized planets by then. We might not even be alive when our star expands. Its possible, however very unlikely. Oh, and about your talk of a blackhole...when your near a blackhole, your basically just...how do i say this in one simple word...Dead. I don't think time would stop, because time continues to go on, even as other things are destroyed in unimaginable ways. And they don't necessarily 'suck' up light...they use gravity, just like Earth.
MTStingray 3 years ago
they do suck light, but only in the eventhorizon , and we will have conolised another planet/with other star/ how many years did it take to send a man to the moon after we started the space program hmm?and u think we whont do anymore evolving in the coming.. thousands of years? hm?
dannes22 3 years ago
Ah, one thing I've noticed about you: you like to say "hm". So do I! Hm...whether we've sent human beings to the Moon or not, does not state that we will definately be colonizing other planets. The best thing we can come to of a planet to survive on (thats like Earth with water and land) is far beyond our system.
MTStingray 3 years ago
lol they are even gona send out stuff 2014 i think it was to the moon " lunar base" we will conolise other planets. how long did it take us to get to the moon, think about that
dannes22 3 years ago
It's nice and all that we might be able to colonize the moon, but the moon isn't a planet, is it? Admit it dude, we DON'T know that we'll colonize other planets. Never say something WILL happen, because we never know what could happen to prevent that. When we talk about colonizing other planets, we mean planets that contain the right supplies. We don't mean a place you can carry habitation 'bases' (like the lunar base). No planets in our solar sytem that we know of are habitable. Only moons.
MTStingray 3 years ago
well, to live on the moon, we'd also need a base, the atmosphere isn't good for us
mightyling 3 years ago
lol, thats what I was saying. We'd truly be colonizing if we were able to survive on a planet without the use of technology, but obviously we need that tech to survive on the moon or any so far discovered planets in the solar system.
MTStingray 3 years ago
Travel through time, do you mean that due to the fact that time is being "warped" the amount of time on earth that passes say... 100 years... the matter that goes thru a black hole will have not aged?
My question may not makes sense but it's the only way i can interpret it.
OhDaesuKG 3 years ago