Point # 3 said that the dust from the collapse was too small to be caused from a buidling collapsing. Bullshit. How the hell would YOU know? Have you ever collapsed a 110 story building before? Has anyone on the planet earth? NO. Not before that day, has that type of building have a jet fly into it, and collapse. NOW WE KNOW what the dust "should" look like if something like that ever happens again. Jesus, let's hope not.
There is no demolition explosions. 40 thousand gallons. High temperature = Weak iron. Pancake collapse demonstrate good STATIC construction, but can`t support thousands of MOVING materials and this is what beat the design FOR STATIC CALCULATIONS. No son demoliciones, las columnas se debilitaron por alta temperatura y cuando se doblan comienzan a recibir miles de toneladas EN MOVIMIENTO que vencen todos los cálculos para resistir CARGAS ESTATICAS....por eso cada piso se rompe ordenadamente.
This is the dumbest one I have seen so far. Ever think the high rate of cancer came from the asbestos in the towers? Of course not, that would make too much sense, so it must have been nukes! LOL.....get a life
4. melted skin? how about a plain blowing up?! the fire would surely melt your face off
5. nothing can be vaporized acorrding to modern physics, plus the action of a falling tower is similar to a volcano. the iron dust is like the volcanic dust which can kill and burn very easly (yes, iron burns)
6. metal takes time to cool off, and if isolated can stay boiling for mounths
7.there was not high cancure rate, check your facts
8.and for the last fucking time there was no explotion it was a colapse!
1. yes nano-nuclear bombs were created in the 50's, so what?
2. how the hell did they mesure the emp during the explotion? ( which wasn't an explotion the only fire was from the air plain fuel) and even if they mesured it afterwards the level of radioactive radiation would kill many near ground zero because of cunsure in the last 10 years.
3. you need extremly high powered explotion to create iron dust? how about a plain blowing up?
It's not a nuke or anything that would leave high radioactivity. The technology used to bring down the WTC looks more-and-more like an advanced explosive placed between the floors, and set-off with precise timing and control. Whatever explosive and application was used, it had to release enough energy to vaporize steel and concrete in midair. <---- PLANES DON"T DO THAT! What created the creators and destruction of the sub-basements, if the cement turn to dust and the steel vaporized?
@macdaddylives Get the hell out of here. Thousands upon thousands of people saw that second plane. It wasn't CGI, it wasn't fake, it was real. You need to stop with this nonsense and realize what happened and stop harming those who relive this day everyday from the missing seat at the dinner table.
No tim Reed Read what I wrote please I logged and to fell a tree you weaken it on one side the point of impact on a building would make that the weak point thi would fall in that direction also if you werent to "notch a tree and try to just cut straight through it it will pinch your saw because it leans in that direction,its the same principle of psychics,The 3 buildings went straight down and one was not hit by a plane!.I am 20+yr Ironworker,I worked on tallest bldg in NC I know how their built
I need to say this you attacked me I missed a little detail sorry man do some research,put it this way I have logged as well,you cut a notch on the heavy or downhill side weakening the tree/(structure) wouln't you think the building would fall toward the weak side you might have nissed the details of psychics bud
An ALUMINUM aircraft ever consider the force of stomping an alumin can with a rubber boot Ever done any Ironwork,you talkin to someone who has built skyscrapers,who knows the properties of steel you know nothing of any details of this so why dont you do yourself ,your family,our country a favor please and learn!
With any kind of nuclear device there would be a high level of Ionizing radiation that would be thrown into the atmosphere causing FALLOUT! The entire city of New York would be a dead zone. Just ask the Manhattan project scientist Louis Alexander Slotin. OH YEAH he died after BRIEF exposure to the same kind of hard radiation that your micro-nuke would put out. No explosion necessary.
I don't have time to argue with those of you who ridicule alternate explanations such as this or nanothermite but will tell you this what we know scientifically is at least 50 yrs behind what a certain "few" know.Instead of wasting time proving your ignorance spend it by learning something and then offer up some intelligence.I'm an ex Ironworker jet fuel LMAO fire did not bring down the 3 buildings
@Ancientmirrors1 No it was not just the jet fuel. I just might have had something to do with getting hit by a 300,000 lb jet aircraft traveling at 500 mph. You may have missed that little detail.
@azar783402 Then if you believe anything else than the US was caught with it's pants down by a bunch of Arabs you sir are a twat of the highest order.
My fucking god are all you that believe this ...touched...is the nicest way I could put it. Never mind the fact that if "micronukes" were used the radiation alarms at the closest nuclear power plants would have gone off...as well as the ones in Canada..this is by far the stupidest shit I have seen in months!
@RedneckR0nin STupidist shit you say, how do you explain this /watch?v=dzm2wfiXdW4 watch it turn to dust. Just because your brain is limited and not opened minded, doesn't mean there isn't much cletherer people than you or technology. Just watch the video I sent and your know some truth.
@benjyboba First it is doesn't mean their isn't much more clever people than you...grammar counts man. If you calculate the stored energy being released by the collapse initiation on both WTC 1 and 2 the exert force coming down was equal to the bomb in Hiroshima. This is however not something I am even going to attempt to explain to you 400 characters at a time. If you want pm me and I will show you the equations and mathematics and you can work it out. Nuclear bombs?/..PLEASE
@RedneckR0nin There is videos showing the steel turn to dust, i've seen it myself so i know something was done desite any mathimatical claim of any kind. Did you know a thunderstorm got the power of 4 maybe 10 nuclear bombs.
@benjyboba Looks like what it is, its debris falling. I dont see the bottom turning to dust. First of all the video is poor quality, and second, well thats just oneof the stupidest "theories" so far. Funny how truthers keep coming up with all these expainations that get dumber every year
@pitt15220 Not on this video but look for the spire turning to dust. I can't be assed to post the link but it was massive and in order to fall directly down it should have toppled over. Something was done to cause what i've seen. There is a lot of very inteligent truthers out there. some are dumb but same as official idiots ive seen on video, not being able to answer a real simple question or maybe ignoring information instead.
@benjyboba If the rest of the truthers were more civilized, like you seem to be. It might be possible to have a "constructive" arguement, instead of going into name calling and all that kids bullshit. Its no secret, I dont believe the theories that our own government is twisted enough to kill its own. I'm really trying to understand these theories, and see things in another light.
@pitt15220 I dont think its about the government killing people, you have to look at all the data and it apears to be buisness related. The abspestos problem was needed to be sorted. If insurance company didnt insure the building for that sort of problem then maybe it was cheaper to demolish it and claim terrorist insurance, an alternative way to claim. Governments do lie, everytime they have an election, they dont do what they say they will. they are only puppets and buisness runs everything.
@Brolin555666 Yes, santa in your head. Take more of your prozac, drink more of your beer and gp back to sleep.
Or get off the information trans, watch WTC The third truth (2 parts), confont the danger, go out to wake up others before evaporated of nukes like B1, B2, B7.
Anyone who thinks this was done by some jet fuel and planes hitting the towers is a complete fucking idiot. And no plane hit Building 7. The buildings didn't "pancake" they were BLOWN UP. AND NOT BY ARABS.
They did the same thing at Chernobyl..Dumped thousands of tons of damp soil and sand on the reactor core to soak up the radiation ....only difference is...Chernobyl was an accident.... and 9/11 was a fuckin lie !!
This is true. The used very low yield atomic demolition munitions ADM's. Wikipedia it. 50 meters radiation, cleaned up with dump trucks of dirt. Thousands of sick clean up crew dying from radiation sickness.
@oOBunnyackOo oh but you did correct yourself. In your first post you said "to generate EMP impulses you need a nuclear explosion ABOVE THE ATMOSPHERE" ...when I corrected you in your error, you made another post mentioning the "Thermosphere". Please pay attention to your own postings. lol
Keep "googling" on how Electromagnetic pulse's work. You have a bit to learn still.
@oOBunnyackOo ... some of what you just said is correct. Nice job..and nice to see you correct yourself.., but please continue reading about EMP's and how they work. I can tell you don't know much about the subject.
@oOBunnyackOo okay Mr. Clueless. You do not have to set off an EMP device ABOVE the atmosphere! There are more than 1 layer of atmosphere, so which layer are you talking about!?! If you're talking about all layers, than you'll be in outer space! You do not need to be this high up!
@oOBunnyackOo ???? Above the atmosphere ? If you go above the atmosphere you'll be in outer space. Good luck setting off the EMP impulse in outer space, while hitting ONLY the WTC buildings lol
comon. i come in here unbiased and watch that collapse for the millionth time and all i can think is = a fucking plane doesnt do that to a building... to the WORLD TRADE CENTER. period. who were they trying to kid??? but kid us they did, and kids we are... be scared.
Dimitri Khalezov is an ex-officer of the Soviet Nuclear Intelligence and expert in Nuclear demolition. He said the US had the plan to bring the WTC down by thermonuclear detonation since the 70/80`s .. cuz this would have been the only save way. If this happened, it would explain the high Tritium Level after 9/11 and the molten engine blocks of the cars around...
Even the smallest nukes generate a kiloton of exothermic expansion which manifests as a blinding flash of light brighter than a thousand suns and a thunderous supersonic bang which would be heard 30 miles away. The Towers were demolishd with tens of thousands of small conventional charges detonated in a sequential downward wave which pulverized the concrete into clouds which expanded outwards by 2 times the width of the building. The EMP from any nuke would have fried all electronics in NY.
If there was so much heat that steel and concrete and building contents were, as you say, vaporized, how did so much paper escape? It was everywhere on the ground. Why were the people caught up in the dust cloud not burned?
@144000V Too bad for your theory, then, that NOT EVERYTHING turned to dust - or perhaps you didn't notice them carting hundreds of thousands of tons of steel & other debris from the site over the following 8 months?
Oh STOP with all the BS theories already that have ZERO evidence. They used nano-thermite to cut the steel. You can even see it on the original video. Check out ae911truth(dot)org for the facts, not the fantasy..
@TruthandPassion The steel wasn't pulverized, the concrete was. There may very well have been other hi-tech explosives in something like ceiling tiles. 911truth(dot)org has one possible scenario they came up with along those lines, though many others are possible. The thermite was just used to cut the steel, but the pulverization was explosives, you can see the squibs go off~20 floors ahead of the collapse/demolition wave in many videos of the event.
@Massaricossudo No need 4 "sorry". I don't discount Khalesov by any means, I'm just going on the scientific evidence I've see proven, and that which I've worked out myself (via conservation of energy, i.e. the official story is a lie). It does not mean DK is wrong.
BTW it's not a dis to call him a "conspiracy theorist" for his ideas. It absolutely WAS a conspiracy, only the details differ, which is really a moot point. The main thing is to convince those responsible that We The People KNOW...
All we need is some shame of the USG. And to blow up those buildings into needs a lot of energy, which can only be explained by the nukes.... And Dimitri's explanation is not about ideas... he is an eyewitness... much different than any of the conspiracy theorists....
@Massaricossudo We need a lot more than shame we need convictions. Unfortunately the depth of USG involvement would warrant REVOLUTION which is why the evidence was summarily (and very illegally) destroyed." It's not what you know, it's what you can prove", like in the movie Training Day. The problem with nukes is high radiation, as well as the yields I have heard postured, stuff like 150 kT. Watch the HE squibs going off below the collapse/blast wave. Conventional HE is much easier/clandestine.
The evidence just can't be destroyed.... The videos prove it all, and they r ALL official... But shame it something you have to be born with.... Will ever any fucking israeli jew hv any shame?.... I haven't seen any of them with any sham... Look what they r doing to the Palestinians for so long... They just don't give a shit... Soon the only solution will be to NUKE israel....
@Massaricossudo Yeah, but in order to convince people beyond a reasonable doubt requires phycal evidence, nearly all of which was quickly shuttled off to blast furnaces in China. It's like the guy who got caught on video stabbing someone, who says "that ain't me" and his attorney describes how the mole on his face was really a shadow;- without physical evidence fingerprints and the murder weapon it is very hard to convince the jury he absolutely did it.
Actually, above any evidence is an eyewitness (Dimitri Khalezov), and there is STILL plenty of physical evidence (Sears towers, and the UN building have the same nuclear devices), and the hole is still there, which I can bet with that there is still PLENTY of evidence, and even confessions (Larry Silverstein on TV, what a dumb ass). Americans are indeed waking up.... one at a time... We ought to pray for justice... It's ALL dirty politics now....
@Massaricossudo Yeah, and it's funny how all the eyewitness accounts of anomalous evidence was ignored. S. Jones has thermite evidence conclusively in the dust at very high levels, (and the binder verified by EPA early on), as well as it on video streaming out of the tower but as both a scientist and someone who plays with thermite, I have a problem with that kind of heat MONTHS later. Even insulated in fiberglass it would cool off in days at best. I'm reading DK's theory now 2 judge 4 myself..
@Massaricossudo Yeah, and it's funny how all the eyewitness accounts of anomalous evidence was ignored. S. Jones has thermite evidence conclusively in the dust at very high levels, (and the binder verified by EPA early on), as well as it on video streaming out of the tower but as both a scientist and someone who plays with thermite, I have a problem with that kind of heat MONTHS later. Even insulated in fiberglass it would cool off in days at best. I'm reading DK's theory now 2 judge 4 myself..
Respond to this video...PS Conclusive proof, such as confessions and a REAL investigation would probably be cause for a revolution, and like many Americans I am VERY well-armed.....
Unfortunately THEY are much better armed than all of us together. A peaceful march to the White House would be advisable. Things just got way too far.... Imagine what they are planning for the next False Flag...
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
Many years ago I knew that the second plane was complete BULL SHIT just looking at the video (have could it just dive in the Tower with no resistance), but I didn't know to prove it like Dimitri Khalezov did.... And please notice that Alex Jones is still selling the planes BULL SHIT story..... Could he be considered a desinfo agent? People like Alex Jones and Richard Gage are getting rich, and famous... isn't that the American Dream... None of them are organizing a huge protest.
@Massaricossudo 2nd plane complete bullshit? What was it, a hologram? My dad was in a nearby office building and saw it as it happened. I'm not saying it was a bone-stock commercial plane full of terrorists. If you can fill a building with bombs, how hard can it be to swap a regular plane for a structurally-modified one containing God-knows what?
Then you father, who certainly didn't see any plane, works for either the CIA, mossad, or MI-6... Because there CERTAINLY wasn't any second plane, and I doubt there wasn't any plane at all... And you haven't watched any of the Dimitri Khalezov's videos. Please do so, since you will free your heart from such hatred.
@Massaricossudo My dad is too loose-lipped to be trusted by any shadowy gov't agency. I guess he and all the other eyewitnesses have had mind-control nano-bots injected into their blood streams when they were getting "vaccinated" for all those childhood diseases that no longer exist.
And what about the ones that didn't see shit? Will truth be decided by a voting poll? Well I guess the US is democracy, right? Everything could be decided by votes... I vote for NO PLANES because the video digital manipulation of the planes is obvious and clear, I just didn't know how to prove it like Dimitri Khalezov did.
@Massaricossudo It's easy to miss something moving at 800+ ft/sec unless you know exactly where and when to look. You still seriously think my dad is a CIA, et.al. operative???????
I KNOW it wasn't a few Arabs with razor knives, and that "pancaking" due to some pussy fires is total BS. As long as we all agree that the "official" version was a lie, that's all that really matters; and an independent investigation needs to be launched. And many people in gov't need to be lynched.
@Massaricossudo True, we need an insider to blow the full whistle. But we R getting divided over specific details, when the real 1st step is 2 get an unbiased investigation launched. The main thing is to convince the public of inconsistencies and unexplained evidence, then let the details fall where they may. It's not important AT THIS POINT whether it was nukes or HE, only that we were lied to and want real answers, whatever they end up being. We should not B divided and conquered.
Nukes? Bullbiscuits! Pure disinfo with no hard data to back it up, most likely intended to get the "truth community" bickering amongst themselves, and thus distracted. Where are the isotopes produced by fission? The neutrons? The gamma radiation? No equipment picked up anything, apart from minor contamination from Americium 241 from the thousands of pulverized smoke detectors in the WTC. Come on people, don't put up crap like this without hard evidence.
Only 4" of concrete were poured over each corrugated steel floor pan. DO NOT VIEW WTC as concrete. IT IS STEEL.
Controlled Demolition INC. designed & implemented plan for emergency demolition using UNDERGROUND nukes. Plan was approved 1968 before towers were built. Mechanical pulverization of core was accomplished using technology perfected during OPERATION PLOWSHARES.
Only needed 3 150 KTON nukes to create 3 football field size cavities and the pulverization.
Why the fuck do you think they called it Ground Zero? What do people call the center of nuclear explosions, Ground Zero! They put the shit in your face and you still don't or won't get it. All you bitches who refuse to accept the truth will get no quarter from me in the form of forgiveness when this reality fall on it's face. You will look at the place you can't go and see me there staring back at you. Remember, I tried to help you because I love each and every one of you. Nuff said.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 3 hours before the actual collapse?
@ctcole77 Try looking up Field Mc'Connell, retired US Fighter Pilot. I think he answers your questions. I live in Northern Ireland and watched the whole day live. I have supervised blasting operations at Quarries many times. I had many questions on how the first tower fell as it did. Then the second tower done exactly.....the same. Then Building 7? It was just too much. There were many remarks and witness statements on the live coverage, seem to have been cut out.
@ctcole77 NORAD was never ordered to intercept. it didn't. Dick Cheney did order the fighters to stand down. That asian guy who worked for him testified about this. Remember? The firefighters were told by someone that WTC7 was coming down. those are dumb questions that assume false things.
We can talk conspiracies all day but the bottom line is regardless of who knew & how, mankind is its own worst enemy. We can only blame the human race for horrible sh!t like this. Not to sound too hippie-ish or anything but we can change the world by starting off with changing ourselves as people. GOD didn't sacrifice his only son so years later we could kill in masses. Come on people, we all say "I wish or I would do or I believe it's cause blah blah blah". Stop being stupid and wise up.
The Question is did some of the people that worked in the WTC notice that some special ranked People came in there and lied by saying: "fixing technical error's" and actually placed a micronuke?
ground zero - the place where a NUCLEAR bomb explodes, where the most severe damage happens (Longman's Advanced American English Dictionary, 2000, ISBN 0 582 31732 0)
It sounds unbelievable, but it seems the only possible explanation for the achievement of the observed energy potential to be. The huge dust clouds, the disappearance of the concrete floors and the enormous heat, which was still measured after a month.
The Sears Tower and the World Trade Centers 2 towers were build with the nuclear demolition feature. Why? Operation plowshare. Some stupid bastard thought they could demolish buildings quickly without irradiating the entire area forever. Turns out they were wrong and operation plowshare got buried but not before they installed this feature in a couple if buildings so some corporation could get some dollars.
Nuclear? EMP? I don't think so. I was there!!! Where is your evidence of an electro-magnetic pulse? The ionization would have knocked out all electronics and specifically radio in the area. The radio was working fine as evidenced by Howard Stern's complete coverage of this cowardly attack by radical islam.
i don't think it was a gravitational collapse i think it is pretty well known that they used thermite (just like almost all demolitions) to take the buildings down. So when people like the one that posted this video say totally ignorant things like this and retards like you believe it, it only takes away from the real debate and those who really want the truth.
And yes, conventional fire is the best explanation - there was hundreds of thousands of tons of flammable materials in those towers, plus unlimited oxygen. Why *wouldn't* they continue to burn?
OTOH no conspiracy-theory explanations - thermite, nukes - can explain the fires burning that long because those did NOT have unlimited fuel, and would have cooled within hours.
@Denierbud11 u know that dosent really help the "official" story either because you're admitting that the collapse of the towers appears to be like a volcano erupting? ...but there were definately no explosives used...lol it seems the real benefactor of this attack was the american military supply corporations (halliburton and lockheed martin) and israel as we are now helping them fight the muslims in the mid east... i bet after another ten years we'll finally win this endless war... lol
@Denierbud11 u know that dosent really help the "official" story either because you're admitting that the collapse of the towers appears to be like a volcano erupting? ...but there were definately no explosives used...lol it seems the real benefactor of this attack was the american military supply corporations (halliburton and lockheed martin) and israel as we are now helping them fight the muslims in the mid east... i bet after another ten years we'll finally win this endless war... lol
Gravity is too weak a force to cause a steel-famed structure to totally disintegrate. And if fires can shred steel-framed structures, the demolition professionals would be out of business. There was no volcanic eruption at the WTC on 9/11/2001. So then, to suspect that either nukes or some other preloaded with explosive material gismos were used is a reasonable guess.
What is unreasonable is the official conspiracy theory. It's like a slice of Swiss cheese for its many holes.
the steel framed structures did not disintegrate -- why do truthers lie? this is such an absurd notion --- the buildings collapsed, fire and structural damage can do that --- if it was nuclear, why did the NYPD helicopters report the walls of the building were bowing out?
Dimitri is 100%. You need an attention span to understand, that's all. *** FULL Dimitri Khalezov amazing 911 documentary interview (2 parts). Sped up by 20%. Copy to your address bar: ... watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
Dimitri is 100%. You need an attention span to understand, that's all. *** FULL Dimitri Khalezov amazing 911 documentary interview (2 parts). Sped up by 20%. Copy to your address bar: ... watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
@jwperry If you can go over all the evidence, watch all the videos and look at all the pics of the Towers being demolished and STILL believe it is a gravitational collapse ... then no, YOU my friend are absolutely retarded!
Please see my channel (click my name to the left) to watch an amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov (Part 1 & Part 2). He leaves no stone unturned about all events on 911. I made edits to his original 26 part interview (4.5 hours long) ... list of edits are listed under both videos. This interview will blow your mind.
@shasha1873 i'm glad you brought this up .... do a Google on "911 rescue workers radiation" and spend time reading the various stories and read about the lawsuites filed by the rescue workers over developing radiation-based illnesses and the # of rescue workers now dead from radiation sickness. If you really want to know the truth about 9/11, Dimitri Khalezov provides it ... remain skeptical but just continue researching on these lines and it'll become very clear to you. Good luck.
I see General Demetre's interview is getting some attention. Nice to see this idea/theory floating YT again.
The other tower constructed with the same demolition plan, the Sear's Tower (recently renamed). Unfortunatly is also has the same anit-human owner as the tower's had. Larry Satan, oops Silverstein. Plus now that Mossad's man Rahm is the King Pin in Chicago, watch for another False Flag, this time the nuclear 'evidence' will be "played out" in all its terror, w/ the MSM leading the way.
I agree on the use of the HAARP array for a massive 'natural' attack on the US but it will be the Madrid Fault Line that will be targeted (according to some it has already started) and not the tower. I still think the tower is doomed, I just think the psychopathic ruling elite will use it for 'terrorist' purposes, to usher in WWIII and the "official' North American Union. The latest culling of the human heard has only just begun.
This guy gets the ball and runs out of bounds with it. Many true facts here but the use of nukes was to vaporize steel and denature concrete in the basement. Every thing else was set up with thermi(a)tes back in the late 1960's during construction. Except the retriggering. That overrode the original use and intent. All records were cleared out before detonation. But they still know what they did.
Nuclear.... (SIZED)....Explosions....There where no nuclear....SIZED...explosions at the WTC on 9/11....So we now have...Dumb....&....dumber.....and....dumbest!!!....Three different truthers three different fantasy's...you guys need to pick one story then stick to it...your herting the movement!!!
@buck65100 it's called searching for truth., you are the DUMBEST because you have no interest in the truth, you are afraid of the truth. Go back to your TV and stay numb.
@blite13 Your searching for truth? Did you see the the title of this video? Congratalations you just made the list!! So now we have ..dumb & dumber....and bumbest....and....down right stupid!!!! Now put your dunce hat on and go stand in the corner!!!
@buck65100 if you are going to call someone dumb or stupid, it's best if you spell it right, got it? Now go back to your lego and TV and get your PROGRAMMING for the day, cheers.
@joecanukk I just found this info too, it lead me to this video, good job exposing this shit. Check out the patent for inventing the artificial cloud patent, he works for Shell Oil....Ronald M. Bass
Senior Staff Engineer
Deepwater Research & Development
Shell International Exploration ......this guy "invented" the artificial cloud maker using HAARP. I can send you all the patents from HAARP
@blite13 Its all out there in the open . But I dont want to miss "american idol" ...Check out the CBC two part report on haarp . Please send the info on the haarp patents ...this system needs to be exposed for what it is .... Also if you arent aware of DR Judy Wood . she presents some great evidence on Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation.
Truthers are the sheeple...Truthers you are being lied to...your leaders are laughing at you well they count there money....you will never hear what you wan't to hear...the truth is here....prove that there is a bomb under willis tower (sears tower)you call yoursellfs truthers then you spread lies..you guy's are so stupid its funny...it's like your being dumb on purpose ...you guy's are very entertaining...what colour is the sky in your little fantasy world???
mini nukes are bombs. so just say bombs people. there is no need to complicate things. once enough sheeple wake up and truth is restored. then let's tell more about what type of explosives were used..
@kousoulides It's important that people understand how the towers were demolished, otherwise you are deluged with questions or comments like "How did they put all those bombs in the building without anyone noticing?" or "Too many people would know about the bombs and couldn't keep it a secret." Nuclear charges placed under the towers at the time they were built makes it simple to answer these questions. It's the ONLY satisfactory answer for their collapse. None of this nano-thermite nonsense.
@fignewtonist Listen, I know the whole story. mininuke were used for the simple reason that they do not explode with fire. or an airplane crash. they were not put underneath the buildings at the time they were built. mininukes are very sophisticated devices. They were put by mossad agents during a "renovation" to the building in each floor in the above floors and of-course used a bigger amount at the basement.
WRONG. I the U.S. government and the U.S.S.R. government and a frightened herd of engineers know nukes were put in the basementSSS during construction. Please do not fog information transfer with noise. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. Then talk and get all the respect in the world. The Mossad agents were doing mayhem outside.
Esoteric directed energy, been around for decades. DEWDROP (Directed Energy Weaponized) fill in the blanks yourself.
kworld01 20 hours ago
Point # 3 said that the dust from the collapse was too small to be caused from a buidling collapsing. Bullshit. How the hell would YOU know? Have you ever collapsed a 110 story building before? Has anyone on the planet earth? NO. Not before that day, has that type of building have a jet fly into it, and collapse. NOW WE KNOW what the dust "should" look like if something like that ever happens again. Jesus, let's hope not.
Holymakinaw 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no demolition explosions. 40 thousand gallons. High temperature = Weak iron. Pancake collapse demonstrate good STATIC construction, but can`t support thousands of MOVING materials and this is what beat the design FOR STATIC CALCULATIONS. No son demoliciones, las columnas se debilitaron por alta temperatura y cuando se doblan comienzan a recibir miles de toneladas EN MOVIMIENTO que vencen todos los cálculos para resistir CARGAS ESTATICAS....por eso cada piso se rompe ordenadamente.
Reeenzor 3 weeks ago
This is the dumbest one I have seen so far. Ever think the high rate of cancer came from the asbestos in the towers? Of course not, that would make too much sense, so it must have been nukes! LOL.....get a life
pitt15220 4 weeks ago
its ok i know your a truther they dont like truthers
hier222 1 month ago
4. melted skin? how about a plain blowing up?! the fire would surely melt your face off
5. nothing can be vaporized acorrding to modern physics, plus the action of a falling tower is similar to a volcano. the iron dust is like the volcanic dust which can kill and burn very easly (yes, iron burns)
6. metal takes time to cool off, and if isolated can stay boiling for mounths
7.there was not high cancure rate, check your facts
8.and for the last fucking time there was no explotion it was a colapse!
tacoandpie 1 month ago
@tacoandpie Your wasting your time on these idiots. Nothing anyone says can make them see how crazy they really are.
pitt15220 4 weeks ago
are you fucking kidding me?
1. yes nano-nuclear bombs were created in the 50's, so what?
2. how the hell did they mesure the emp during the explotion? ( which wasn't an explotion the only fire was from the air plain fuel) and even if they mesured it afterwards the level of radioactive radiation would kill many near ground zero because of cunsure in the last 10 years.
3. you need extremly high powered explotion to create iron dust? how about a plain blowing up?
tacoandpie 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's not a nuke or anything that would leave high radioactivity. The technology used to bring down the WTC looks more-and-more like an advanced explosive placed between the floors, and set-off with precise timing and control. Whatever explosive and application was used, it had to release enough energy to vaporize steel and concrete in midair. <---- PLANES DON"T DO THAT! What created the creators and destruction of the sub-basements, if the cement turn to dust and the steel vaporized?
Born2Flesh 1 month ago
Comment removed
Born2Flesh 1 month ago
Miniature nukes? Is this a joke?
TheNYLibertarian 2 months ago
DEW weapons nothing less nothing more! Nukes cause radiation folks!
itsanillusion100 2 months ago
there were no bloody planes..wake up...
boadicea2 2 months ago
@boadicea2 If there were no planes how did I see them when I was there?
killakidnaruto 2 months ago
@killakidnaruto here is your answer watch?v=rSzPn9rsPcY
macdaddylives 2 months ago
@macdaddylives Go fuck yourself. I knew a person on that plane, you think I fucking imagined all that?
Get fucked for yourself you cunt.
killakidnaruto 2 months ago
@killakidnaruto watch and think twice /watch?v=q3v4QUQpYjc
/watch?v=i6eMq5Rit1w
Threeam89 1 month ago
@Threeam89 Why the fuck should I think twice?
killakidnaruto 1 month ago
@macdaddylives Get the hell out of here. Thousands upon thousands of people saw that second plane. It wasn't CGI, it wasn't fake, it was real. You need to stop with this nonsense and realize what happened and stop harming those who relive this day everyday from the missing seat at the dinner table.
timoteoman13 2 months ago 2
No tim Reed Read what I wrote please I logged and to fell a tree you weaken it on one side the point of impact on a building would make that the weak point thi would fall in that direction also if you werent to "notch a tree and try to just cut straight through it it will pinch your saw because it leans in that direction,its the same principle of psychics,The 3 buildings went straight down and one was not hit by a plane!.I am 20+yr Ironworker,I worked on tallest bldg in NC I know how their built
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
I need to say this you attacked me I missed a little detail sorry man do some research,put it this way I have logged as well,you cut a notch on the heavy or downhill side weakening the tree/(structure) wouln't you think the building would fall toward the weak side you might have nissed the details of psychics bud
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
@Ancientmirrors1 ? Surely you're not comparing a modern, mostly-empty skyscraper to a TREE - are you?
TimReed22222 2 months ago
An ALUMINUM aircraft ever consider the force of stomping an alumin can with a rubber boot Ever done any Ironwork,you talkin to someone who has built skyscrapers,who knows the properties of steel you know nothing of any details of this so why dont you do yourself ,your family,our country a favor please and learn!
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
With any kind of nuclear device there would be a high level of Ionizing radiation that would be thrown into the atmosphere causing FALLOUT! The entire city of New York would be a dead zone. Just ask the Manhattan project scientist Louis Alexander Slotin. OH YEAH he died after BRIEF exposure to the same kind of hard radiation that your micro-nuke would put out. No explosion necessary.
Mauler85 2 months ago
I don't have time to argue with those of you who ridicule alternate explanations such as this or nanothermite but will tell you this what we know scientifically is at least 50 yrs behind what a certain "few" know.Instead of wasting time proving your ignorance spend it by learning something and then offer up some intelligence.I'm an ex Ironworker jet fuel LMAO fire did not bring down the 3 buildings
Ancientmirrors1 2 months ago
@Ancientmirrors1 No it was not just the jet fuel. I just might have had something to do with getting hit by a 300,000 lb jet aircraft traveling at 500 mph. You may have missed that little detail.
MGCAUSTIN4 2 months ago
Utterly moronic
kangtimelord 2 months ago
Most truther logic is quite sad and depressing but this one made me laugh, thank you!
Spindry96 2 months ago
Micro nukes!?!? Yeah, now I've heard everything.
MGCAUSTIN 2 months ago
@MGCAUSTIN *Hear a nerd voice with this lol* AHAH But they have them on Call of Duty!!!!!!!!!
Mauler85 2 months ago
@azar783402 Then if you believe anything else than the US was caught with it's pants down by a bunch of Arabs you sir are a twat of the highest order.
Geemonster69 3 months ago
My fucking god are all you that believe this ...touched...is the nicest way I could put it. Never mind the fact that if "micronukes" were used the radiation alarms at the closest nuclear power plants would have gone off...as well as the ones in Canada..this is by far the stupidest shit I have seen in months!
RedneckR0nin 3 months ago
@RedneckR0nin I really can't stand conspiracy chumps.
They should be lined up and shot.
Geemonster69 3 months ago
@RedneckR0nin STupidist shit you say, how do you explain this /watch?v=dzm2wfiXdW4 watch it turn to dust. Just because your brain is limited and not opened minded, doesn't mean there isn't much cletherer people than you or technology. Just watch the video I sent and your know some truth.
benjyboba 1 month ago
@benjyboba First it is doesn't mean their isn't much more clever people than you...grammar counts man. If you calculate the stored energy being released by the collapse initiation on both WTC 1 and 2 the exert force coming down was equal to the bomb in Hiroshima. This is however not something I am even going to attempt to explain to you 400 characters at a time. If you want pm me and I will show you the equations and mathematics and you can work it out. Nuclear bombs?/..PLEASE
RedneckR0nin 1 month ago
@RedneckR0nin There is videos showing the steel turn to dust, i've seen it myself so i know something was done desite any mathimatical claim of any kind. Did you know a thunderstorm got the power of 4 maybe 10 nuclear bombs.
benjyboba 1 month ago
@benjyboba Looks like what it is, its debris falling. I dont see the bottom turning to dust. First of all the video is poor quality, and second, well thats just oneof the stupidest "theories" so far. Funny how truthers keep coming up with all these expainations that get dumber every year
pitt15220 4 weeks ago
@pitt15220 Not on this video but look for the spire turning to dust. I can't be assed to post the link but it was massive and in order to fall directly down it should have toppled over. Something was done to cause what i've seen. There is a lot of very inteligent truthers out there. some are dumb but same as official idiots ive seen on video, not being able to answer a real simple question or maybe ignoring information instead.
benjyboba 3 weeks ago
@benjyboba If the rest of the truthers were more civilized, like you seem to be. It might be possible to have a "constructive" arguement, instead of going into name calling and all that kids bullshit. Its no secret, I dont believe the theories that our own government is twisted enough to kill its own. I'm really trying to understand these theories, and see things in another light.
pitt15220 3 weeks ago
@pitt15220 I dont think its about the government killing people, you have to look at all the data and it apears to be buisness related. The abspestos problem was needed to be sorted. If insurance company didnt insure the building for that sort of problem then maybe it was cheaper to demolish it and claim terrorist insurance, an alternative way to claim. Governments do lie, everytime they have an election, they dont do what they say they will. they are only puppets and buisness runs everything.
benjyboba 3 weeks ago
Oh ya, nuke. How about ufos? Or santa?
Brolin555666 3 months ago
@Brolin555666 Yes, santa in your head. Take more of your prozac, drink more of your beer and gp back to sleep.
Or get off the information trans, watch WTC The third truth (2 parts), confont the danger, go out to wake up others before evaporated of nukes like B1, B2, B7.
ludmilalloyd 3 months ago
You freaks are retarded.
usgp1 3 months ago
Anyone who thinks this was done by some jet fuel and planes hitting the towers is a complete fucking idiot. And no plane hit Building 7. The buildings didn't "pancake" they were BLOWN UP. AND NOT BY ARABS.
Prancer1231 3 months ago
@alexjones67 Mossad/CIA/Zionists/Neocons did it with the help of our government.
Prancer1231 3 months ago
@alexjones67 do you maybe want to talk about the towers with me in a private message?
FSCzitterdFSC 3 months ago
WELL, WHAT DO WE HAVE HERE, FOLKS?! ANOTHER CONSPIRACY CITIZEN HERE TO EMBARASS THEMSELF ALONG WITH THE OTHER 7 BILLION CONSPIRACY RETARDS!!!???
malcolmmorin 3 months ago
One of the best video on youtube !! nice 1 spooked..
Emin7 3 months ago
They did the same thing at Chernobyl..Dumped thousands of tons of damp soil and sand on the reactor core to soak up the radiation ....only difference is...Chernobyl was an accident.... and 9/11 was a fuckin lie !!
Emin7 3 months ago
this is such a great post.. n1 and ty
Emin7 3 months ago
anybody know the music ? PLEASE ;)
Emin7 3 months ago
This is true. The used very low yield atomic demolition munitions ADM's. Wikipedia it. 50 meters radiation, cleaned up with dump trucks of dirt. Thousands of sick clean up crew dying from radiation sickness.
tropophyte 3 months ago
@tropophyte u know it
Emin7 3 months ago
Are you retarded?
MrRocodromo 3 months ago
@oOBunnyackOo oh but you did correct yourself. In your first post you said "to generate EMP impulses you need a nuclear explosion ABOVE THE ATMOSPHERE" ...when I corrected you in your error, you made another post mentioning the "Thermosphere". Please pay attention to your own postings. lol
Keep "googling" on how Electromagnetic pulse's work. You have a bit to learn still.
fox2 4 months ago
@oOBunnyackOo ... some of what you just said is correct. Nice job..and nice to see you correct yourself.., but please continue reading about EMP's and how they work. I can tell you don't know much about the subject.
fox2 4 months ago
@oOBunnyackOo okay Mr. Clueless. You do not have to set off an EMP device ABOVE the atmosphere! There are more than 1 layer of atmosphere, so which layer are you talking about!?! If you're talking about all layers, than you'll be in outer space! You do not need to be this high up!
Please go back and check your sources.
fox2 4 months ago
@oOBunnyackOo ???? Above the atmosphere ? If you go above the atmosphere you'll be in outer space. Good luck setting off the EMP impulse in outer space, while hitting ONLY the WTC buildings lol
fox2 4 months ago
THERMATE
username7046 4 months ago
It happens under my sheets when alone.
nowhere991 4 months ago
comon. i come in here unbiased and watch that collapse for the millionth time and all i can think is = a fucking plane doesnt do that to a building... to the WORLD TRADE CENTER. period. who were they trying to kid??? but kid us they did, and kids we are... be scared.
gomachols 4 months ago
nuclear is the only thing that can turn steel into dust.period
144000V 4 months ago
1:44 this is not nuclear .. this is thermate :O
65465468 4 months ago
Comment removed
65465468 4 months ago
Dimitri Khalezov is an ex-officer of the Soviet Nuclear Intelligence and expert in Nuclear demolition. He said the US had the plan to bring the WTC down by thermonuclear detonation since the 70/80`s .. cuz this would have been the only save way. If this happened, it would explain the high Tritium Level after 9/11 and the molten engine blocks of the cars around...
SuperYesyesyo 4 months ago
Comment removed
SuperYesyesyo 4 months ago
Even the smallest nukes generate a kiloton of exothermic expansion which manifests as a blinding flash of light brighter than a thousand suns and a thunderous supersonic bang which would be heard 30 miles away. The Towers were demolishd with tens of thousands of small conventional charges detonated in a sequential downward wave which pulverized the concrete into clouds which expanded outwards by 2 times the width of the building. The EMP from any nuke would have fried all electronics in NY.
dreamdiction 5 months ago
If there was so much heat that steel and concrete and building contents were, as you say, vaporized, how did so much paper escape? It was everywhere on the ground. Why were the people caught up in the dust cloud not burned?
Gaelicfella2011 5 months ago
150 kiloton under each tower is the only thing that can turn everything to dust.
144000V 5 months ago
@144000V Too bad for your theory, then, that NOT EVERYTHING turned to dust - or perhaps you didn't notice them carting hundreds of thousands of tons of steel & other debris from the site over the following 8 months?
TimReed22222 5 months ago
Honestly this was the most believable one I've seen yet...
91noslenjc 5 months ago
Dimitri Khalezov explains 911... no more theories.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
what's the name of the audio track . It's chilling!
Great video.
Mozartmostly 5 months ago
Oh STOP with all the BS theories already that have ZERO evidence. They used nano-thermite to cut the steel. You can even see it on the original video. Check out ae911truth(dot)org for the facts, not the fantasy..
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 how does nanothermite pulverize 80,000 tons of steel into dust instantly? that makes no sense.
TruthandPassion 5 months ago
@TruthandPassion The steel wasn't pulverized, the concrete was. There may very well have been other hi-tech explosives in something like ceiling tiles. 911truth(dot)org has one possible scenario they came up with along those lines, though many others are possible. The thermite was just used to cut the steel, but the pulverization was explosives, you can see the squibs go off~20 floors ahead of the collapse/demolition wave in many videos of the event.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
LOL! There is nothing like wishful thinking.... Dimitri Khalezov is no conspiracy theorist.... sorry.. Reality is a bitch.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo No need 4 "sorry". I don't discount Khalesov by any means, I'm just going on the scientific evidence I've see proven, and that which I've worked out myself (via conservation of energy, i.e. the official story is a lie). It does not mean DK is wrong.
BTW it's not a dis to call him a "conspiracy theorist" for his ideas. It absolutely WAS a conspiracy, only the details differ, which is really a moot point. The main thing is to convince those responsible that We The People KNOW...
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
All we need is some shame of the USG. And to blow up those buildings into needs a lot of energy, which can only be explained by the nukes.... And Dimitri's explanation is not about ideas... he is an eyewitness... much different than any of the conspiracy theorists....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo We need a lot more than shame we need convictions. Unfortunately the depth of USG involvement would warrant REVOLUTION which is why the evidence was summarily (and very illegally) destroyed." It's not what you know, it's what you can prove", like in the movie Training Day. The problem with nukes is high radiation, as well as the yields I have heard postured, stuff like 150 kT. Watch the HE squibs going off below the collapse/blast wave. Conventional HE is much easier/clandestine.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
The evidence just can't be destroyed.... The videos prove it all, and they r ALL official... But shame it something you have to be born with.... Will ever any fucking israeli jew hv any shame?.... I haven't seen any of them with any sham... Look what they r doing to the Palestinians for so long... They just don't give a shit... Soon the only solution will be to NUKE israel....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yeah, but in order to convince people beyond a reasonable doubt requires phycal evidence, nearly all of which was quickly shuttled off to blast furnaces in China. It's like the guy who got caught on video stabbing someone, who says "that ain't me" and his attorney describes how the mole on his face was really a shadow;- without physical evidence fingerprints and the murder weapon it is very hard to convince the jury he absolutely did it.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Actually, above any evidence is an eyewitness (Dimitri Khalezov), and there is STILL plenty of physical evidence (Sears towers, and the UN building have the same nuclear devices), and the hole is still there, which I can bet with that there is still PLENTY of evidence, and even confessions (Larry Silverstein on TV, what a dumb ass). Americans are indeed waking up.... one at a time... We ought to pray for justice... It's ALL dirty politics now....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yeah, and it's funny how all the eyewitness accounts of anomalous evidence was ignored. S. Jones has thermite evidence conclusively in the dust at very high levels, (and the binder verified by EPA early on), as well as it on video streaming out of the tower but as both a scientist and someone who plays with thermite, I have a problem with that kind of heat MONTHS later. Even insulated in fiberglass it would cool off in days at best. I'm reading DK's theory now 2 judge 4 myself..
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Not mentioning the ones that were murdered like Barry Jennings (hopefully I got his name right). We will need a 5 million march to the White House...
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yeah, and it's funny how all the eyewitness accounts of anomalous evidence was ignored. S. Jones has thermite evidence conclusively in the dust at very high levels, (and the binder verified by EPA early on), as well as it on video streaming out of the tower but as both a scientist and someone who plays with thermite, I have a problem with that kind of heat MONTHS later. Even insulated in fiberglass it would cool off in days at best. I'm reading DK's theory now 2 judge 4 myself..
Snoep76239 5 months ago
Respond to this video...PS Conclusive proof, such as confessions and a REAL investigation would probably be cause for a revolution, and like many Americans I am VERY well-armed.....
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Unfortunately THEY are much better armed than all of us together. A peaceful march to the White House would be advisable. Things just got way too far.... Imagine what they are planning for the next False Flag...
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
Snoep76239 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Massaricossudo Yeah, 5 million people in one place. Good spot for another "terrorist" event. Poof! goes the opposition. What troubles me about Dimitri, is that he follows the "no planes" BS, my dad was there and saw the plane. A mass hypnosis machine? It's a little too X-files. I've found other errors in DK's rant too, I just don't trust anybody, because EVERYONE lies to some extent to further their own agenda.. Nuke or not doesn't matter. If it was CD, we were lied to in a BIG way...
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Many years ago I knew that the second plane was complete BULL SHIT just looking at the video (have could it just dive in the Tower with no resistance), but I didn't know to prove it like Dimitri Khalezov did.... And please notice that Alex Jones is still selling the planes BULL SHIT story..... Could he be considered a desinfo agent? People like Alex Jones and Richard Gage are getting rich, and famous... isn't that the American Dream... None of them are organizing a huge protest.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo 2nd plane complete bullshit? What was it, a hologram? My dad was in a nearby office building and saw it as it happened. I'm not saying it was a bone-stock commercial plane full of terrorists. If you can fill a building with bombs, how hard can it be to swap a regular plane for a structurally-modified one containing God-knows what?
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Then you father, who certainly didn't see any plane, works for either the CIA, mossad, or MI-6... Because there CERTAINLY wasn't any second plane, and I doubt there wasn't any plane at all... And you haven't watched any of the Dimitri Khalezov's videos. Please do so, since you will free your heart from such hatred.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo My dad is too loose-lipped to be trusted by any shadowy gov't agency. I guess he and all the other eyewitnesses have had mind-control nano-bots injected into their blood streams when they were getting "vaccinated" for all those childhood diseases that no longer exist.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
And what about the ones that didn't see shit? Will truth be decided by a voting poll? Well I guess the US is democracy, right? Everything could be decided by votes... I vote for NO PLANES because the video digital manipulation of the planes is obvious and clear, I just didn't know how to prove it like Dimitri Khalezov did.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo It's easy to miss something moving at 800+ ft/sec unless you know exactly where and when to look. You still seriously think my dad is a CIA, et.al. operative???????
I KNOW it wasn't a few Arabs with razor knives, and that "pancaking" due to some pussy fires is total BS. As long as we all agree that the "official" version was a lie, that's all that really matters; and an independent investigation needs to be launched. And many people in gov't need to be lynched.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
No... What really matters is the truth... All we need is an eyewitness willing to talk....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo True, we need an insider to blow the full whistle. But we R getting divided over specific details, when the real 1st step is 2 get an unbiased investigation launched. The main thing is to convince the public of inconsistencies and unexplained evidence, then let the details fall where they may. It's not important AT THIS POINT whether it was nukes or HE, only that we were lied to and want real answers, whatever they end up being. We should not B divided and conquered.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
Nukes? Bullbiscuits! Pure disinfo with no hard data to back it up, most likely intended to get the "truth community" bickering amongst themselves, and thus distracted. Where are the isotopes produced by fission? The neutrons? The gamma radiation? No equipment picked up anything, apart from minor contamination from Americium 241 from the thousands of pulverized smoke detectors in the WTC. Come on people, don't put up crap like this without hard evidence.
bloggulator 5 months ago
@bloggulator
Yeah.. and the plane that dives in the tower is not BULL SHIT.... LOL!
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
google "nuclear-demolition-wikipedia"
The Answer
morpheus341 5 months ago
5 more seconds of this video you would have seen the steel spire columns turn to powder before your eyes.
truthbetoldni 5 months ago
Couple comment clarifications:
Only 4" of concrete were poured over each corrugated steel floor pan. DO NOT VIEW WTC as concrete. IT IS STEEL.
Controlled Demolition INC. designed & implemented plan for emergency demolition using UNDERGROUND nukes. Plan was approved 1968 before towers were built. Mechanical pulverization of core was accomplished using technology perfected during OPERATION PLOWSHARES.
Only needed 3 150 KTON nukes to create 3 football field size cavities and the pulverization.
StratusBlue 5 months ago
Why the fuck do you think they called it Ground Zero? What do people call the center of nuclear explosions, Ground Zero! They put the shit in your face and you still don't or won't get it. All you bitches who refuse to accept the truth will get no quarter from me in the form of forgiveness when this reality fall on it's face. You will look at the place you can't go and see me there staring back at you. Remember, I tried to help you because I love each and every one of you. Nuff said.
Daddyo930 5 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 3 hours before the actual collapse?
ctcole77 5 months ago
@ctcole77 Try looking up Field Mc'Connell, retired US Fighter Pilot. I think he answers your questions. I live in Northern Ireland and watched the whole day live. I have supervised blasting operations at Quarries many times. I had many questions on how the first tower fell as it did. Then the second tower done exactly.....the same. Then Building 7? It was just too much. There were many remarks and witness statements on the live coverage, seem to have been cut out.
truthbetoldni 5 months ago
@ctcole77 NORAD was never ordered to intercept. it didn't. Dick Cheney did order the fighters to stand down. That asian guy who worked for him testified about this. Remember? The firefighters were told by someone that WTC7 was coming down. those are dumb questions that assume false things.
TruthandPassion 5 months ago
We can talk conspiracies all day but the bottom line is regardless of who knew & how, mankind is its own worst enemy. We can only blame the human race for horrible sh!t like this. Not to sound too hippie-ish or anything but we can change the world by starting off with changing ourselves as people. GOD didn't sacrifice his only son so years later we could kill in masses. Come on people, we all say "I wish or I would do or I believe it's cause blah blah blah". Stop being stupid and wise up.
MHOK76 5 months ago
@spooked911
The Question is did some of the people that worked in the WTC notice that some special ranked People came in there and lied by saying: "fixing technical error's" and actually placed a micronuke?
Tarek701 5 months ago
ground zero - the place where a NUCLEAR bomb explodes, where the most severe damage happens (Longman's Advanced American English Dictionary, 2000, ISBN 0 582 31732 0)
tsbaurzhan 5 months ago
It sounds unbelievable, but it seems the only possible explanation for the achievement of the observed energy potential to be. The huge dust clouds, the disappearance of the concrete floors and the enormous heat, which was still measured after a month.
monzinator 5 months ago
The Sears Tower and the World Trade Centers 2 towers were build with the nuclear demolition feature. Why? Operation plowshare. Some stupid bastard thought they could demolish buildings quickly without irradiating the entire area forever. Turns out they were wrong and operation plowshare got buried but not before they installed this feature in a couple if buildings so some corporation could get some dollars.
Daddyo930 6 months ago
great backing track, care to share it ??
Emin7 7 months ago
what is the music? WTC were nuked.
1000fantomas 7 months ago
Nuclear? EMP? I don't think so. I was there!!! Where is your evidence of an electro-magnetic pulse? The ionization would have knocked out all electronics and specifically radio in the area. The radio was working fine as evidenced by Howard Stern's complete coverage of this cowardly attack by radical islam.
GreysAreHere 7 months ago
i don't think it was a gravitational collapse i think it is pretty well known that they used thermite (just like almost all demolitions) to take the buildings down. So when people like the one that posted this video say totally ignorant things like this and retards like you believe it, it only takes away from the real debate and those who really want the truth.
jwperry 7 months ago
1. True (at least, small enough to be carried in a backpack).
2. Dubious; where is the evidence for EMP?
3. Dubious; who says the dust particles were too small to be accounted for by collapse?
4. True, and also reported in many non-nuclear incidents. Nukes NOT required.
5. Bullshit; where is the evidence steel was vaporized?
6. True; and conventional underground fires are the BEST explanation for this.
7. Red herring; no medical professionals have, AFAIK, identified radiation as a cause.
TimReed22222 7 months ago
@TimReed22222
Just to your sixth point: Six MONTHS of -you say- conventional underground fires is the "best explanation"???
How will conventional fires take the materiel to burn half a year?
applecom1de 6 months ago
@applecom1de Actually, it was closer to 3 months.
And yes, conventional fire is the best explanation - there was hundreds of thousands of tons of flammable materials in those towers, plus unlimited oxygen. Why *wouldn't* they continue to burn?
OTOH no conspiracy-theory explanations - thermite, nukes - can explain the fires burning that long because those did NOT have unlimited fuel, and would have cooled within hours.
TimReed22222 6 months ago
what the hell is the strax sedan h-bomb
MrRickmowen 8 months ago
what the hell is the stax sedan h-bomb
MrRickmowen 8 months ago
Thank-you for your concise reporting of the TRUTH. Open your eyes, people!! Open your minds!! WAKEN UP!
MsChannigan 8 months ago
so was Mount St Helen's nuked ??
Denierbud11 9 months ago 4
@Denierbud11 u know that dosent really help the "official" story either because you're admitting that the collapse of the towers appears to be like a volcano erupting? ...but there were definately no explosives used...lol it seems the real benefactor of this attack was the american military supply corporations (halliburton and lockheed martin) and israel as we are now helping them fight the muslims in the mid east... i bet after another ten years we'll finally win this endless war... lol
guarasci12 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Denierbud11 u know that dosent really help the "official" story either because you're admitting that the collapse of the towers appears to be like a volcano erupting? ...but there were definately no explosives used...lol it seems the real benefactor of this attack was the american military supply corporations (halliburton and lockheed martin) and israel as we are now helping them fight the muslims in the mid east... i bet after another ten years we'll finally win this endless war... lol
guarasci12 5 months ago
@Denierbud11
Gravity is too weak a force to cause a steel-famed structure to totally disintegrate. And if fires can shred steel-framed structures, the demolition professionals would be out of business. There was no volcanic eruption at the WTC on 9/11/2001. So then, to suspect that either nukes or some other preloaded with explosive material gismos were used is a reasonable guess.
What is unreasonable is the official conspiracy theory. It's like a slice of Swiss cheese for its many holes.
LuciaMuse 5 months ago
@LuciaMuse
the steel framed structures did not disintegrate -- why do truthers lie? this is such an absurd notion --- the buildings collapsed, fire and structural damage can do that --- if it was nuclear, why did the NYPD helicopters report the walls of the building were bowing out?
Denierbud11 5 months ago
steel-framed
LuciaMuse 5 months ago
Google "9/11 Cancers"
WTCnucleardemolition 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dimitri is 100%. You need an attention span to understand, that's all. *** FULL Dimitri Khalezov amazing 911 documentary interview (2 parts). Sped up by 20%. Copy to your address bar: ... watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
anthonyc31 9 months ago
Dimitri is 100%. You need an attention span to understand, that's all. *** FULL Dimitri Khalezov amazing 911 documentary interview (2 parts). Sped up by 20%. Copy to your address bar: ... watch?v=vNuKAdGlxFo
anthonyc31 9 months ago
I don't know if it was nuked, butit was surly an inside job with a coverup.
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
this is absolutely retarded.
jwperry 9 months ago
@jwperry If you can go over all the evidence, watch all the videos and look at all the pics of the Towers being demolished and STILL believe it is a gravitational collapse ... then no, YOU my friend are absolutely retarded!
luvmyctd 7 months ago
...and if my grandmother had wheels, she would be a wagon.
KarmaCollin 10 months ago
Please see my channel (click my name to the left) to watch an amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov (Part 1 & Part 2). He leaves no stone unturned about all events on 911. I made edits to his original 26 part interview (4.5 hours long) ... list of edits are listed under both videos. This interview will blow your mind.
anthonyc31 10 months ago
idiots making stupid videos................
shasha1873 10 months ago
sheeple
antonfilth 10 months ago
@antonfilth Dude, nuclear explosions give off radiation. There was none detected on that day.
shasha1873 10 months ago
@shasha1873 i'm glad you brought this up .... do a Google on "911 rescue workers radiation" and spend time reading the various stories and read about the lawsuites filed by the rescue workers over developing radiation-based illnesses and the # of rescue workers now dead from radiation sickness. If you really want to know the truth about 9/11, Dimitri Khalezov provides it ... remain skeptical but just continue researching on these lines and it'll become very clear to you. Good luck.
anthonyc31 6 months ago
I see General Demetre's interview is getting some attention. Nice to see this idea/theory floating YT again.
The other tower constructed with the same demolition plan, the Sear's Tower (recently renamed). Unfortunatly is also has the same anit-human owner as the tower's had. Larry Satan, oops Silverstein. Plus now that Mossad's man Rahm is the King Pin in Chicago, watch for another False Flag, this time the nuclear 'evidence' will be "played out" in all its terror, w/ the MSM leading the way.
iceisnice61 10 months ago
@iceisnice61 yea they will destroy the sears tower via what will seem to be a catastrophic natural disaster, though it will have been caused by HAARP
Roonoon2 10 months ago
@Roonoon2
Hi Roonoon
Thanks for the comment, how about this,
I agree on the use of the HAARP array for a massive 'natural' attack on the US but it will be the Madrid Fault Line that will be targeted (according to some it has already started) and not the tower. I still think the tower is doomed, I just think the psychopathic ruling elite will use it for 'terrorist' purposes, to usher in WWIII and the "official' North American Union. The latest culling of the human heard has only just begun.
iceisnice61 10 months ago
@iceisnice61
At least this time we will know who did it.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
Damn, this makes the thermite and missile theorists look smart...
fghjconner 10 months ago
This guy gets the ball and runs out of bounds with it. Many true facts here but the use of nukes was to vaporize steel and denature concrete in the basement. Every thing else was set up with thermi(a)tes back in the late 1960's during construction. Except the retriggering. That overrode the original use and intent. All records were cleared out before detonation. But they still know what they did.
HowardTLewisIII 11 months ago
"Polygraph" ...
watch?v=puVfsNBW5ms
WTCnucleardemolition 11 months ago
Look up Dr. Judy Wood for what really happened.
1971SuperLead 11 months ago
Nuclear.... (SIZED)....Explosions....There where no nuclear....SIZED...explosions at the WTC on 9/11....So we now have...Dumb....&....dumber.....and....dumbest!!!....Three different truthers three different fantasy's...you guys need to pick one story then stick to it...your herting the movement!!!
buck65100 11 months ago
@buck65100 it's called searching for truth., you are the DUMBEST because you have no interest in the truth, you are afraid of the truth. Go back to your TV and stay numb.
blite13 11 months ago
@blite13 Your searching for truth? Did you see the the title of this video? Congratalations you just made the list!! So now we have ..dumb & dumber....and bumbest....and....down right stupid!!!! Now put your dunce hat on and go stand in the corner!!!
buck65100 11 months ago
@buck65100 you can't even spell, what is congratalations? what is bumbest? yes, downright stupid is right. you clown.
blite13 11 months ago
@blite13 You found a typo... good for you!! congrat (U) lations on your epic win!! WINNING!!!
buck65100 11 months ago
@buck65100 if you are going to call someone dumb or stupid, it's best if you spell it right, got it? Now go back to your lego and TV and get your PROGRAMMING for the day, cheers.
blite13 11 months ago
U.S. Patent 4873928:
H.A.A.R.P
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors: Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Oct. 17, 1989
Filed: June 15, 1987
joecanukk 11 months ago
@joecanukk I just found this info too, it lead me to this video, good job exposing this shit. Check out the patent for inventing the artificial cloud patent, he works for Shell Oil....Ronald M. Bass
Senior Staff Engineer
Deepwater Research & Development
Shell International Exploration ......this guy "invented" the artificial cloud maker using HAARP. I can send you all the patents from HAARP
blite13 11 months ago
@joecanukk
U.S. Patent 4999637:
Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth
Inventors: Bass; Ronald M., Houston, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 12, 1991
Filed: May. 14, 1987
blite13 11 months ago
@blite13 Its all out there in the open . But I dont want to miss "american idol" ...Check out the CBC two part report on haarp . Please send the info on the haarp patents ...this system needs to be exposed for what it is .... Also if you arent aware of DR Judy Wood . she presents some great evidence on Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation.
joecanukk 11 months ago
This is great!!.. dumb and dumber don't agree where the nukes where placed..I know maybe it was droped from the ENOLA GAY 2...Buffoons.
buck65100 11 months ago
Truthers are the sheeple...Truthers you are being lied to...your leaders are laughing at you well they count there money....you will never hear what you wan't to hear...the truth is here....prove that there is a bomb under willis tower (sears tower)you call yoursellfs truthers then you spread lies..you guy's are so stupid its funny...it's like your being dumb on purpose ...you guy's are very entertaining...what colour is the sky in your little fantasy world???
buck65100 11 months ago
mini nukes are bombs. so just say bombs people. there is no need to complicate things. once enough sheeple wake up and truth is restored. then let's tell more about what type of explosives were used..
kousoulides 11 months ago
@kousoulides It's important that people understand how the towers were demolished, otherwise you are deluged with questions or comments like "How did they put all those bombs in the building without anyone noticing?" or "Too many people would know about the bombs and couldn't keep it a secret." Nuclear charges placed under the towers at the time they were built makes it simple to answer these questions. It's the ONLY satisfactory answer for their collapse. None of this nano-thermite nonsense.
fignewtonist 11 months ago
@fignewtonist Listen, I know the whole story. mininuke were used for the simple reason that they do not explode with fire. or an airplane crash. they were not put underneath the buildings at the time they were built. mininukes are very sophisticated devices. They were put by mossad agents during a "renovation" to the building in each floor in the above floors and of-course used a bigger amount at the basement.
kousoulides 11 months ago
WRONG. I the U.S. government and the U.S.S.R. government and a frightened herd of engineers know nukes were put in the basementSSS during construction. Please do not fog information transfer with noise. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. Then talk and get all the respect in the world. The Mossad agents were doing mayhem outside.
HowardTLewisIII 11 months ago
@fignewtonist nanothermite was part of the retriggering apparatus.
HowardTLewisIII 11 months ago