Europeans unlike Americans don't have infants circumcised and don't have the death penalty either. Every culture has idiotic customs, but I'll give Americans a break, in some third world counties they cut off female genitalia, that's worse.
I have the best perspective of all. I was uncircumcised for 44 years til this past March. Benefits: Not embarrassed or feeling "odd" around the gym or hot tub parties, No odor, Less sensitivity = longer sex time, no premature ejaculation and no oversensitivity = less recovery time to perform again. I would have been more active in sports but everyone laughed at me as a kid so I did not dress out. I am much happier and so is the Mrs. It did not hurt that bad either. Get it done!!
This is not "genital mutilation" or "torture" in any way when performed via sterile and safe surgical methods. It is an essential part of the Jewish faith, and they are entitled to their faith. A baby can't choose for himself, therefore, that right to make choices regarding the child's health remains with the mother/parents. There are many health benefits to circumcision, and it is by no means morally wrong. When I have children, I want to be able to choose what I deem best for my son's health.
whatever you say, it smell bad. even u wash it, after 2 hours, the smell is there again. well, if people wants to be uncircumcized then everyone is free. remember, if u have a gf, if her vigina smells so bad like a rotten dead rat, that means she just had sedx with uncircumcized man.
My theory: Circumcision increases intelligence by integrating infant's penis tip sensations with early associations of sight, sound, touch, sense of self, and thinking that would otherwise be largely delayed until adolescence. The purpose of the foreskin seems to be to create a separate state of mind beginning in adolescence when the penis is often erected involving an urgency to intercourse and joyful reward for following through. Evolution valued making more babies over intelligence.
oh how i love a goo rant. BULL SHIT!!!!!! this vid is full of shit i myself have just been circumcised and in can say it aint all bad i need to wait for it to heal but after that sex will be better cause me jed will actually be out fuck forseskin its cleaner without it so your argument there is balls ill agree that people should be able to decide weather to have it done or not but chicks dig it way more cause its smoother so bam another one of your arguments blown out the water...f.t forseskin!
@seyxlondon you do feel most of it dumb ass. when men are circumcised they still have their inner foreskin. atleast i do. and they feel a ton of pleasure. maybe some cut men dont. but i do.
@seyxlondon you think men cant feel it? Your a complete dumbass. Every circumcised man i know loves getting head and has incredible sex. dont be an ignorant fool. Yes circumcision takes away the gliding motion and keeps the glans exposed, thats why im restoring to gain it all back. Because yes you take away glans sensitivty if you get cut, that sure as hell doesnt mean you dont love sex. Dont be an idiot. Its the most common procedure in the US and majority of men arent complanin or itd be gone
What a bunch of ignorant crap--cut men have lost the majority of their penile nerves, nearly all of the specialized nerves, and up to 3/4 of their penile sensations and sensitivity.
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL
@Tandykane Ignorant crap? I just fucking told you yes circumcision takes away the gliding and glans sensitivty? Wtf is wrong with you? You did nothing to rebut my point. What is ignorant about my statement? Are you a man? have you ever gotten head? Yes they can feel it you ignorant fool. And yes circumcised men love sex, i know plenty, and i am one. What a moron
You forgot to also mention that not only the glans loses sensitivity, there is the loss of the majority of penile nerves, nearly all of the specialized nerves and up to 3/4 of the entire sensation and sensitivity.
No one is claiming that ALL sensation is lost--just most of it.
@Tandykane ask any many restored men how their new foreskin feels and they will tell you it feels 90% as good as the original. they had it all 3 ways. I dont agree with RIC...it should be the babies choice. Quit being ignorant when you arent restored and you dont know me. I know about circumcision dumb ass. You can get back the glans sensitivity like i just said, you can get back the gliding which feels incredible. The 20,000 nerves is not as significant as you think it is spread over an area
@Tandykane Okay. You can be ignorant. Ive seen and listened to many men say its 90% the same restored. Your an idiot and you havent done it. You forget it is the synergistic co-operation of the glans, inner mucusa and frenular delta strech that produce the great amounts of pleasure. Stretch j receptors. heard of em? Circumcised men can take adavatage of it because they need slack skin.
Do a little read up and see what men on forums say. men reports 70-90% feeling back im not going to argue....
Funny, you cite the frenular delta which is removed in the majority of circumcisions and the stretch receptors which are always removed. So with these missing, how does restoration negate the loss of these?
Read Taylor, and then you will understand what circumcision REMOVES.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
@Tandykane hmm well the frenulum is usually removed, but the delta is the sensitive skin along the underside of the inner skin with its base at the junction of inner and outer skin. Even Ron Low, the inventer of the TLC tugger, explains the stretch receptors can be used once you have slack skin. And 1000s of men say the same. I know what circumcision removes dumb ass. It's pretty obvious too if you look at a uncut penis with a cut one. Are you even a guy? Are you even circumcised.-- Its 70-90%.-
Thanks for the anecdotes, but unfortunately there are anecdotes that claim the opposite.. and I prefer logic and evidence over anecdotes. Perhaps you might wish to read:
The Frenular Delta: A New Preputial Structure by Ken McGrath
Understanding Circumcision, edited by Denniston et al
"explains the stretch receptors can be used once you have slack skin."
But the stretch receptors are in the ridged band and the frenulum which are removed with most circumcisions, so precisely which stretch receptors do you believe are activated?
@Tandykane You fucking idiot. There are stretch receptors and fine touch receptors in the inner skin too. You aren't even a guy. You are dramatizing this. Yes a lot what taken from cut men but they still have a lot. Do some research on restoring cause you obviously have no idea about it. I can ask many restored men what their penis feels like after restoration. You can't speak because you aren't circumcised or restored. Shut the fuck up you sound like an ignorant fool.
I am not denying that restoration does not return some of the sensations to the cut penis. but one should stick to the facts and logic when they are stating the degree of this restoration.
@Tandykane it restores A LOT. I know that wasnt our arguement, but thats all i was saying. I KNOW about circumcision, I KNOW what it does. I DO believe infants should have a choice, AND I KNOW the usual effects of lifetime Circumcision. It is a very subjective topic because you may have one guy who can feel poorly, or not be satisfied, while some not cut so bad and have large amounts of satisfaction. Either way, restoration brings a lot to nearly all back and should be taught until this is GONE.
@Tandykane So you are saying 1/3 of all men in the US dont like being circumcised yet it isnt on the news or the word is not very common? 52 men were not polled you dumbass. Everyone ive ever known doesnt talk about circumcision like a huge debate. And if they were dissatisfied it would be widespread and they would not have their sons cut. 52% in 1999, BullS. It doesnt say in that report either
@openwidesky Never stopped me from getting head, and most girls don't even realize unless I tell them. And who cares if they are that ignorant you should teach them or move on to the next lol.
@Mrjonnie1000 Oh, by the way, "I saw a program that bla bla bla proves my point somehow" Really just makes you sound like you can't do your own research and form your own opinion. hitler used to put out smear campaigns against the jews that you would hear on radio programs and such, would you beleive what you heard on THOSE programs? come on, do some research of your own. look up real demographics and statistics instead of trusting the history channel to do all the work for you.
@Mrjonnie1000 wow, didn't you even read what i said? the areas that HAVE the medical technology to circumsized properly also had the MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY to fight deseases like that! and possibly condoms, but I dont' live in africa and i'm pretty sure you don't either! So before you go around insulting people get your facts straight and actually read their comment. Look up those demographics again, and do your own little test by researching how many of those areas have medical treatment centers.
@Mrjonnie1000 HIV has ABSOLUATLY nothing to do with not being cicumsized! it has to do with AFRICA. why don't YOU do some research and figure out that africa itself whether you are cicumsized or not is "rif" with HIV. and the Tribes that had circumsized men probably also had the MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY to do so! Thus having the MEDICAL attention people need is the reason behing the decline in HIV! Before you start to talk about this stuff, go to college and take a medical class of ANY type!
@DrOpSxOn3r sure, if you are gross pig and don't understand how to clean yourself. I would hope that most people can and can teach their children how to clean themselves. It is no harder then teaching your teenage child that they now have to use deoderent every morning. or teaching a child that they need to wipe their butt when they go to the bathroom, as long as your parents know what the hell they are doing not being circumsized no longer has the negative hygenic affect it used to.
Circumcision best way to beat AIDS ,say scientists ...this article was published Indian Express dated 11 may 2008,Modelling suggests male circumcision could avert up to 5.7 million new HIV infections and three million deaths over 20 year.
Alhamdulillah It was made Cumpolsury 1400 hundred years ago Hazrat Mohammed (PBUH)
Felt a bit ill reading most the comments below. Anyway, as an uncut and gay male, I can't abide to touch cut men and their ugly freak-dicks. I draw a thick line precluding the dating of such men.
Fortunatley, here in the UK, I am not burning all my bridges here. I may be wrong, but I can't see how cut men can have ANY pleasure. It makes me feel queasy...
The video is well put together, but seriously dude, we know it's not about hygiene.. The reason why males are circumcised is because: THEY ARE NOT WORTHY OF PLEASURE!!
@SeanJohn03691 at least spell it correctly LOL. BTW how are they better? That's how we're suppose to look, if we were meant to be like that we would have been born circumcised. BUT it's ok, we all have out opinions.
Everytime I see this brought up, I'm forced to remember I'm cut. *Sigh* Well, at least I can take solace in the fact that a cut cock looks just a smidge nicer...hardly seems worth it, though...
I've been chopped. It's much better without. You can delay ejaculation for longer + the orgasm (when it happens) is exactly the same. You are entitled to your opinion but I think men are better off without it.
@22Yeller You have no idea what you are talking about. And I'm guessing you don't have sex very often if you are worried about ejaculating to quickly. Sex feels better with a foreskin..... How can you not be for that? Oh and it feels a loooooooooot better.
I'm cut, and I'm THANKFUL for it! Uncut dicks are usually so nasty! They look like ant-eater snouts or elephant trunks! YUCK! It doesn't matter if they're clean, 80% of uncut guy's dick stink. *shivers* Cut is better, cause you last longer, and it's cleaner, and it's prettier! Cut is GOOD!
@valefor188 Yeah right. Cut is good. When I had mine, I chose my own style of cut - a V-Cut - just to expose the head, no foreskin was thrown. I still have the nerves, the clean-look and extra rubbing studs on the sides of my penis. I am totally THANKFUL too. My friends think of having a V-Cut, too.
Unfortunately circumcision is done in God's name. There are attempts to justify it on health grounds using data collected from a group of Kenyan males and relating to the transmission of the AIDS virus by prostitutes (not exactly a fair sample group).
There is also a feeling that it is somehow more sanitary. Although to make the penis sanitary can be accomplished easily with soap and water.
I was circumcised at a time when it was done to all English males without reference to religion. Regrets
Yeah I'm pretty mad I was cut its difficult to get over. I've always wondered what its like. And yeah you dont cut off a girls breasts to prevent breast cancer as a kid so how is it right to be circumcised? Is it really that much better not to be though?
I am afraid it is. remember Circumcision has only one real purpose and that is to reduce sensetivity of the penis in other words to reduce pleasure. In order to prevent masturbation, because it was seem as an evil thing, the fact os it doesn't prevent masturbation but it does reduce the pleasure. by around 70% to 80% depending on how much highly sensetive nerves are removed in circumcision, average around. 20000 highly sensetive nerve receptors cells are removed in circumcision. It is sick.
circumcision is done for prevention of STDs and other stuff. a man dat is circumsied is less likey (30 40%) to catch a disease than the one who anit.... but now circumsion is less common because people are practiing safe sex wid condoms.. so do ur reseach and stop teaching nonsense about its done to decrease masturbation humans have been circumsing each other since egypt and thats where civalisation started. if u dont want to be circumsied thats fine but dont teach utter rubbish
@Buddylovebabi Circumcision is the removal of the prepuce or foreskin. Some women choose to have this done as it exposes the clitoris more and increases sexual pleasure.
you are so right. i'm glad that foregen.org gives me hope!
For those that didn't want to be cut, foregen is working to regenerate everything lost to circumcision including the foreskin, ridged band, frenulum, and 20,000 nerve endings
@tehphilgreg If you take away all feeling from a man's penis, he can last indefinitely. Circumcising reduces sensitivity so it's feasible that men last longer.
Conversely, that means taking away a lot of pleasure. Not just for the man, but for his partners. The circumcised penis dries out and chafes the vagina and its hard and infrequent thrusts make it harder for the woman to orgasm.
Bottom line: there are better ways to get a man to last longer in bed than cutting off part of his penis.
"does that mean that when you cut off the foreskin you can last longer? and that's a serious question" Actually the Scandinavians found circumcised men suffer from PE MORE often than normal men--the specialized nerves of the foreskin provide more feedback allowing one to adjust.
@seyxlondon actually you keep most of those in the inner foreskin....which you still have. in addition to the glans. second, the 20,000 endings are spread evenly over the entire penis....completely different than a clitoris
@xE4syComp4nyx no you dont. I know about the inner skin because i belong to a forum with men who dont. I have a 5.5 inch long penis, and many men would kill to have all my foreskin, i have 3 inches of inner foreskin and im restoring so i can get slack skin and actually USE it haha. And i can keep my glans covered and moist.. Which yes does increase glans sensitivity. That is true. Unless your circumcision was messed up really bad, you can still restore and get back what you lost.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
statisically men who are circumsized have a reduced risk of stds in males in an uncircumcised male the risk of a uti is 1 in 100 in a circumcised male the risk is 1 in 1000 this is in a book called your babys first year week by week there are way more benefits than that too
But how in the world does cutting off a tiny piece of skin even protect against STDs. The only thing this does is make cleaning of the penis more managable but in the end what does this circumsized person really lose?
@ultimatelionhearttv "what does this circumsized person really lose?" - Most of the sensitivity in their penis! I'd rather spend a second or two in the shower, retracting my foreskin, than be partially emasculated! The foreskin is a double layered structure that has an area, in the adult, of 12-15 square inches. The evidence for STD protection is contradictory and plagued by junk science. The only sure protection is abstinence or the use of condoms. This is preferable to genital mutilation.
The reduced risk of infections is documented by the AMA but only in the first year. All other benefits receive no credence by the AMA. This aspect is NOT a reason to perform ANY surgery, but only something to consider if you yourself are contemplating the procedure for yourself. As the AMA states "There are no indications to recommend circumcision in the neonatal period". We need to consider that the boy may not want this done to him. I know I didn't want it but I was not asked.
Please if you may. Watch the entire movie Whose body, whose rights there is a history of circ. reliable info. It divided into 6 pieces, please watch them if you may and if you wish send me a comment. Whose body, whose rights
I'm so glad you posted this. The foreskin is every bit as vital to a male's full sexual experience as the clitoral hood and labia minora are to a female's. In fact they are the SAME tissue until three months' gestation.
Foreskin feels REALLY good. HIS body, HIS decision.
lose the 4skin, lose the labia
zJohnnyRingoz 2 months ago
Europeans unlike Americans don't have infants circumcised and don't have the death penalty either. Every culture has idiotic customs, but I'll give Americans a break, in some third world counties they cut off female genitalia, that's worse.
paralogos 4 months ago
I have the best perspective of all. I was uncircumcised for 44 years til this past March. Benefits: Not embarrassed or feeling "odd" around the gym or hot tub parties, No odor, Less sensitivity = longer sex time, no premature ejaculation and no oversensitivity = less recovery time to perform again. I would have been more active in sports but everyone laughed at me as a kid so I did not dress out. I am much happier and so is the Mrs. It did not hurt that bad either. Get it done!!
jperry58 6 months ago in playlist operations
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not "genital mutilation" or "torture" in any way when performed via sterile and safe surgical methods. It is an essential part of the Jewish faith, and they are entitled to their faith. A baby can't choose for himself, therefore, that right to make choices regarding the child's health remains with the mother/parents. There are many health benefits to circumcision, and it is by no means morally wrong. When I have children, I want to be able to choose what I deem best for my son's health.
dennalilly 8 months ago
whatever you say, it smell bad. even u wash it, after 2 hours, the smell is there again. well, if people wants to be uncircumcized then everyone is free. remember, if u have a gf, if her vigina smells so bad like a rotten dead rat, that means she just had sedx with uncircumcized man.
TierraCorta 9 months ago
@TierraCorta You smell your own penis? What the hell? You smell other mens penises? Rofl
turtleshellshocker 8 months ago
@turtleshellshocker ha ha. u r funny. (laughing). Well, i just want to leave my comment as it is. Have a wonderful day ahead.
TierraCorta 8 months ago
Not only am i happy that I am not circumsized but I am going to fight against this culture as long as there are religious f****** writing dum shit
seshu240cc 11 months ago
@seshu240cc haha idiot
xE4syComp4nyx 11 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx u must be one of those F___ religious mofus,
seshu240cc 11 months ago
HEY EVERYBODY; LET ME TELL YOU A LITTLE SECRET; It's hoax; a Jewish hoax. It's also they, who snuff out most of pleasure, from human kind. Nuff said.
sainttuber 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My theory: Circumcision increases intelligence by integrating infant's penis tip sensations with early associations of sight, sound, touch, sense of self, and thinking that would otherwise be largely delayed until adolescence. The purpose of the foreskin seems to be to create a separate state of mind beginning in adolescence when the penis is often erected involving an urgency to intercourse and joyful reward for following through. Evolution valued making more babies over intelligence.
joefriendly 1 year ago
It's my body, it's my decision, persuading me will never change my mind.
Lyronx 1 year ago
oh how i love a goo rant. BULL SHIT!!!!!! this vid is full of shit i myself have just been circumcised and in can say it aint all bad i need to wait for it to heal but after that sex will be better cause me jed will actually be out fuck forseskin its cleaner without it so your argument there is balls ill agree that people should be able to decide weather to have it done or not but chicks dig it way more cause its smoother so bam another one of your arguments blown out the water...f.t forseskin!
lewisbmth 1 year ago
Good luck getting head if you're not circumcised. A lot of bitches simply won't go down if it's hooded. They think it's filthy.
openwidesky 1 year ago
@openwidesky Well whats the point getting head if you don't feel most of it anyway...
seyxlondon 1 year ago 11
@seyxlondon you do feel most of it dumb ass. when men are circumcised they still have their inner foreskin. atleast i do. and they feel a ton of pleasure. maybe some cut men dont. but i do.
xE4syComp4nyx 1 year ago
@seyxlondon you think men cant feel it? Your a complete dumbass. Every circumcised man i know loves getting head and has incredible sex. dont be an ignorant fool. Yes circumcision takes away the gliding motion and keeps the glans exposed, thats why im restoring to gain it all back. Because yes you take away glans sensitivty if you get cut, that sure as hell doesnt mean you dont love sex. Dont be an idiot. Its the most common procedure in the US and majority of men arent complanin or itd be gone
xE4syComp4nyx 11 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
What a bunch of ignorant crap--cut men have lost the majority of their penile nerves, nearly all of the specialized nerves, and up to 3/4 of their penile sensations and sensitivity.
Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss 2 0 07 BJU INTERNATIONAL
Tandykane 11 months ago
@Tandykane Ignorant crap? I just fucking told you yes circumcision takes away the gliding and glans sensitivty? Wtf is wrong with you? You did nothing to rebut my point. What is ignorant about my statement? Are you a man? have you ever gotten head? Yes they can feel it you ignorant fool. And yes circumcised men love sex, i know plenty, and i am one. What a moron
xE4syComp4nyx 11 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
You forgot to also mention that not only the glans loses sensitivity, there is the loss of the majority of penile nerves, nearly all of the specialized nerves and up to 3/4 of the entire sensation and sensitivity.
No one is claiming that ALL sensation is lost--just most of it.
And one can never get this loss back.
Tandykane 11 months ago
@Tandykane ask any many restored men how their new foreskin feels and they will tell you it feels 90% as good as the original. they had it all 3 ways. I dont agree with RIC...it should be the babies choice. Quit being ignorant when you arent restored and you dont know me. I know about circumcision dumb ass. You can get back the glans sensitivity like i just said, you can get back the gliding which feels incredible. The 20,000 nerves is not as significant as you think it is spread over an area
xE4syComp4nyx 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xE4syComp4nyx
"The 20,000 nerves is not as significant as you think it is spread over an area"
Since this is the majority of the penile nerves, and nearly all of specialized ones, this statement makes no sense.
Tandykane 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
"The 20,000 nerves is not as significant as you think it is spread over an area."
Considering that these 20,000nerves are the majority of the penile nerves and nearly all of the specialized nerves, this assertion is not logical.
And since "restoring" does not replace these nerves, it is not reasonable to state that restoration brings back 90% of the lost sensation.
Tandykane 10 months ago
@Tandykane Okay. You can be ignorant. Ive seen and listened to many men say its 90% the same restored. Your an idiot and you havent done it. You forget it is the synergistic co-operation of the glans, inner mucusa and frenular delta strech that produce the great amounts of pleasure. Stretch j receptors. heard of em? Circumcised men can take adavatage of it because they need slack skin.
Do a little read up and see what men on forums say. men reports 70-90% feeling back im not going to argue....
xE4syComp4nyx 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
Funny, you cite the frenular delta which is removed in the majority of circumcisions and the stretch receptors which are always removed. So with these missing, how does restoration negate the loss of these?
Read Taylor, and then you will understand what circumcision REMOVES.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
Tandykane 10 months ago
@Tandykane hmm well the frenulum is usually removed, but the delta is the sensitive skin along the underside of the inner skin with its base at the junction of inner and outer skin. Even Ron Low, the inventer of the TLC tugger, explains the stretch receptors can be used once you have slack skin. And 1000s of men say the same. I know what circumcision removes dumb ass. It's pretty obvious too if you look at a uncut penis with a cut one. Are you even a guy? Are you even circumcised.-- Its 70-90%.-
xE4syComp4nyx 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
Thanks for the anecdotes, but unfortunately there are anecdotes that claim the opposite.. and I prefer logic and evidence over anecdotes. Perhaps you might wish to read:
The Frenular Delta: A New Preputial Structure by Ken McGrath
Understanding Circumcision, edited by Denniston et al
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2001
Tandykane 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
"explains the stretch receptors can be used once you have slack skin."
But the stretch receptors are in the ridged band and the frenulum which are removed with most circumcisions, so precisely which stretch receptors do you believe are activated?
Tandykane 10 months ago
@Tandykane You fucking idiot. There are stretch receptors and fine touch receptors in the inner skin too. You aren't even a guy. You are dramatizing this. Yes a lot what taken from cut men but they still have a lot. Do some research on restoring cause you obviously have no idea about it. I can ask many restored men what their penis feels like after restoration. You can't speak because you aren't circumcised or restored. Shut the fuck up you sound like an ignorant fool.
xE4syComp4nyx 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
I am not denying that restoration does not return some of the sensations to the cut penis. but one should stick to the facts and logic when they are stating the degree of this restoration.
Tandykane 10 months ago
@Tandykane it restores A LOT. I know that wasnt our arguement, but thats all i was saying. I KNOW about circumcision, I KNOW what it does. I DO believe infants should have a choice, AND I KNOW the usual effects of lifetime Circumcision. It is a very subjective topic because you may have one guy who can feel poorly, or not be satisfied, while some not cut so bad and have large amounts of satisfaction. Either way, restoration brings a lot to nearly all back and should be taught until this is GONE.
xE4syComp4nyx 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
I would agree to "a lot", but not agree to "nearly all", as the majority of nerves are still missing, and can never be gotten back.
Tandykane 10 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
"US and majority of men arent complanin or itd be gone
This survey indicated there are 52 million men in the US that are dissatisfied with their circumcision.
A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood
T. Hammond, BJU International (83, Suppl. 1), p. 85-92, January, 1999 circumcised intact
Satisfied 38% 78%
Dissatisfied 20% 3%
Ambivalent 41% 17%
Tandykane 11 months ago
@Tandykane So you are saying 1/3 of all men in the US dont like being circumcised yet it isnt on the news or the word is not very common? 52 men were not polled you dumbass. Everyone ive ever known doesnt talk about circumcision like a huge debate. And if they were dissatisfied it would be widespread and they would not have their sons cut. 52% in 1999, BullS. It doesnt say in that report either
xE4syComp4nyx 11 months ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
Don't you know what a poll is?
And I don't think a "rebuttal by assumption" can be considered a valid rebuttal.
In case you don't know it, the CDC says that the circumcision rate has dropped to ~32%
Tandykane 11 months ago
@openwidesky , getting head is still a pale imitation of what it's like to have a foreskin gliding over your penis.
PungiFungi 11 months ago
@openwidesky Never stopped me from getting head, and most girls don't even realize unless I tell them. And who cares if they are that ignorant you should teach them or move on to the next lol.
fourthborn 11 months ago
@fourthborn
yes, one should think of a foreskin as a shallow, ignorant woman filter.. :)
Tandykane 11 months ago
@openwidesky Hooded? Bitches? Lmfao, We know dogs love your unsensitive small penis. :)
turtleshellshocker 8 months ago
@turtleshellshocker One of these days, when you come out of your shell, you'll be shocked to know how little you know about this subject.
openwidesky 8 months ago
YEA Fleiss is the MAN!
chaoscraig5v7o 1 year ago
@Mrjonnie1000 Oh, by the way, "I saw a program that bla bla bla proves my point somehow" Really just makes you sound like you can't do your own research and form your own opinion. hitler used to put out smear campaigns against the jews that you would hear on radio programs and such, would you beleive what you heard on THOSE programs? come on, do some research of your own. look up real demographics and statistics instead of trusting the history channel to do all the work for you.
Buddylovebabi 1 year ago
@Mrjonnie1000 wow, didn't you even read what i said? the areas that HAVE the medical technology to circumsized properly also had the MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY to fight deseases like that! and possibly condoms, but I dont' live in africa and i'm pretty sure you don't either! So before you go around insulting people get your facts straight and actually read their comment. Look up those demographics again, and do your own little test by researching how many of those areas have medical treatment centers.
Buddylovebabi 1 year ago
your wrong about the cleanliness part
gamer123226 1 year ago
@Mrjonnie1000 HIV has ABSOLUATLY nothing to do with not being cicumsized! it has to do with AFRICA. why don't YOU do some research and figure out that africa itself whether you are cicumsized or not is "rif" with HIV. and the Tribes that had circumsized men probably also had the MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY to do so! Thus having the MEDICAL attention people need is the reason behing the decline in HIV! Before you start to talk about this stuff, go to college and take a medical class of ANY type!
Buddylovebabi 1 year ago
maby THE GUY THAT DID THIS IN THE USA HAVE THIS DONE TO HIS FUCKING PENIS HE CAN FUCK HIS MOM1
UnderSkull1 1 year ago
im cut and wish i was left natural WTF do they need to do this BULL SHIT surgery for......just let me be the way i was born idiots !!
jdmk20aek 1 year ago
wtf?
why is everyone saying this is better?
you know how many girls hate that shit?
and if you dont shower and shit it gets infected..thats fuckin gross
it looks fuckin retarded and most likely you aint getting none!
get circumcised..youll get head more and you'll last longer in bed..
i will FORSURE get my kid circumcised..
DrOpSxOn3r 1 year ago
@DrOpSxOn3r sure, if you are gross pig and don't understand how to clean yourself. I would hope that most people can and can teach their children how to clean themselves. It is no harder then teaching your teenage child that they now have to use deoderent every morning. or teaching a child that they need to wipe their butt when they go to the bathroom, as long as your parents know what the hell they are doing not being circumsized no longer has the negative hygenic affect it used to.
Buddylovebabi 1 year ago
@Buddylovebabi good luck with a nasty dick dude..
DrOpSxOn3r 1 year ago
get cut and use lube. it makes it that much better
guitarhero2211 1 year ago
Circumcision best way to beat AIDS ,say scientists ...this article was published Indian Express dated 11 may 2008,Modelling suggests male circumcision could avert up to 5.7 million new HIV infections and three million deaths over 20 year.
Alhamdulillah It was made Cumpolsury 1400 hundred years ago Hazrat Mohammed (PBUH)
MohammedAkbar1 1 year ago
Felt a bit ill reading most the comments below. Anyway, as an uncut and gay male, I can't abide to touch cut men and their ugly freak-dicks. I draw a thick line precluding the dating of such men.
Fortunatley, here in the UK, I am not burning all my bridges here. I may be wrong, but I can't see how cut men can have ANY pleasure. It makes me feel queasy...
drodga 1 year ago
The video is well put together, but seriously dude, we know it's not about hygiene.. The reason why males are circumcised is because: THEY ARE NOT WORTHY OF PLEASURE!!
All your Meissner corpuscles are belong to us!!!
Circumcisionisrape 1 year ago
I circumised myself a few days ago as my foreskin couldnt go all the way down, I hopw in the long run it is worth it
AbhiB 1 year ago
SURCUMSIZED PENISES ARE BETTER THEN UNCURCUMSIZED PENINES, period.
SeanJohn03691 1 year ago
@SeanJohn03691 at least spell it correctly LOL. BTW how are they better? That's how we're suppose to look, if we were meant to be like that we would have been born circumcised. BUT it's ok, we all have out opinions.
ciciironwill27 1 year ago
Thanks a lot, jerk. >.>
Everytime I see this brought up, I'm forced to remember I'm cut. *Sigh* Well, at least I can take solace in the fact that a cut cock looks just a smidge nicer...hardly seems worth it, though...
MyOldName 1 year ago
Really, what's the point in boys getting circumsised??? Just for looks? That's dumb and pointless.
Inyoureyes911 1 year ago
I've been chopped. It's much better without. You can delay ejaculation for longer + the orgasm (when it happens) is exactly the same. You are entitled to your opinion but I think men are better off without it.
22Yeller 1 year ago
@22Yeller You have no idea what you are talking about. And I'm guessing you don't have sex very often if you are worried about ejaculating to quickly. Sex feels better with a foreskin..... How can you not be for that? Oh and it feels a loooooooooot better.
MyFace43 1 year ago
@MyFace43 I have had sex both with + without so I DO know what I'm talking about. I stand (pun intended) by every word of my original posting !!!!!!
22Yeller 1 year ago
I'm cut, and I'm THANKFUL for it! Uncut dicks are usually so nasty! They look like ant-eater snouts or elephant trunks! YUCK! It doesn't matter if they're clean, 80% of uncut guy's dick stink. *shivers* Cut is better, cause you last longer, and it's cleaner, and it's prettier! Cut is GOOD!
valefor188 1 year ago
@valefor188 what i want to know is...why are you talking about how pretty a dick is? O_O
skullythebloger 1 year ago
@valefor188 Why are you smelling guys dicks?
zipzap93 1 year ago 2
@valefor188 Yeah right. Cut is good. When I had mine, I chose my own style of cut - a V-Cut - just to expose the head, no foreskin was thrown. I still have the nerves, the clean-look and extra rubbing studs on the sides of my penis. I am totally THANKFUL too. My friends think of having a V-Cut, too.
rogerbvilla 1 year ago
Then why do so many males circumcised as adults enjoy sex the same or more after circumcision. Anti circiers should stop fretting and get a life.
petermelb 1 year ago
Unfortunately circumcision is done in God's name. There are attempts to justify it on health grounds using data collected from a group of Kenyan males and relating to the transmission of the AIDS virus by prostitutes (not exactly a fair sample group).
There is also a feeling that it is somehow more sanitary. Although to make the penis sanitary can be accomplished easily with soap and water.
I was circumcised at a time when it was done to all English males without reference to religion. Regrets
stacatto4 1 year ago
When we talk about insanity there is "circumcision" and then everything else!
CANVECVIDEO 1 year ago
Yeah I'm pretty mad I was cut its difficult to get over. I've always wondered what its like. And yeah you dont cut off a girls breasts to prevent breast cancer as a kid so how is it right to be circumcised? Is it really that much better not to be though?
mrspuffsitekick 1 year ago
i am not cut and i am happy my parents didnt cut me
deepsanjodholi 2 years ago 17
I am afraid it is. remember Circumcision has only one real purpose and that is to reduce sensetivity of the penis in other words to reduce pleasure. In order to prevent masturbation, because it was seem as an evil thing, the fact os it doesn't prevent masturbation but it does reduce the pleasure. by around 70% to 80% depending on how much highly sensetive nerves are removed in circumcision, average around. 20000 highly sensetive nerve receptors cells are removed in circumcision. It is sick.
seyxlondon 1 year ago 16
@seyxlondon
circumcision is done for prevention of STDs and other stuff. a man dat is circumsied is less likey (30 40%) to catch a disease than the one who anit.... but now circumsion is less common because people are practiing safe sex wid condoms.. so do ur reseach and stop teaching nonsense about its done to decrease masturbation humans have been circumsing each other since egypt and thats where civalisation started. if u dont want to be circumsied thats fine but dont teach utter rubbish
prince112233 1 year ago
@prince112233 The claim that it reduces STDs is just the latest in a long line of excuses.
Check out:
wwwDOTaskdrsearsDOTcom/html/1/t012000.asp
Replace DOT with .
The main reason in the US, and elsewhere in the English speaking world, WAS to curb
masturbation. Check out the circumcision videos on freedom0speech's channel, including the female circ' ones.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@seyxlondon I am circumcised, and I am perfectly happy. Also, many women choose to be circumcised as it increases pleasure for them.
HomeworkHelper1 1 year ago
@HomeworkHelper1 do you even realize what female cicumsisio is??? NO WOMAN would EVER CHOSE to be cicumsized!
Buddylovebabi 1 year ago
@Buddylovebabi Circumcision is the removal of the prepuce or foreskin. Some women choose to have this done as it exposes the clitoris more and increases sexual pleasure.
HomeworkHelper1 1 year ago
@seyxlondon excuse me but i was told that circumcision does promote sensitivity on the penis i didnt get circumcised though so i wouldnt know
erictsang3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seyxlondon
you are so right. i'm glad that foregen.org gives me hope!
For those that didn't want to be cut, foregen is working to regenerate everything lost to circumcision including the foreskin, ridged band, frenulum, and 20,000 nerve endings
stkcarm5 1 year ago
@seyxlondon does that mean that when you cut off the foreskin you can last longer? and that's a serious question
tehphilgreg 1 year ago
@tehphilgreg If you take away all feeling from a man's penis, he can last indefinitely. Circumcising reduces sensitivity so it's feasible that men last longer.
Conversely, that means taking away a lot of pleasure. Not just for the man, but for his partners. The circumcised penis dries out and chafes the vagina and its hard and infrequent thrusts make it harder for the woman to orgasm.
Bottom line: there are better ways to get a man to last longer in bed than cutting off part of his penis.
Mystoksor 1 year ago
@tehphilgreg
"does that mean that when you cut off the foreskin you can last longer? and that's a serious question" Actually the Scandinavians found circumcised men suffer from PE MORE often than normal men--the specialized nerves of the foreskin provide more feedback allowing one to adjust.
Tandykane 1 year ago
@seyxlondon I HATE MY PARENTS!!!!!
KeshaIsHot808 1 year ago
@seyxlondon actually you keep most of those in the inner foreskin....which you still have. in addition to the glans. second, the 20,000 endings are spread evenly over the entire penis....completely different than a clitoris
xE4syComp4nyx 1 year ago
@xE4syComp4nyx
No, the 20,00 nerves are in the foreskin --and nearly all of the specialized nerves and that is the part that is chopped off--the glans has very few.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Volume 77, Pages 291-295,February 1996.
The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision
by J.R. Taylor, A.P. Lockwood and A.J. Taylor
Tandykane 1 year ago
@xE4syComp4nyx no you dont. I know about the inner skin because i belong to a forum with men who dont. I have a 5.5 inch long penis, and many men would kill to have all my foreskin, i have 3 inches of inner foreskin and im restoring so i can get slack skin and actually USE it haha. And i can keep my glans covered and moist.. Which yes does increase glans sensitivity. That is true. Unless your circumcision was messed up really bad, you can still restore and get back what you lost.
xE4syComp4nyx 11 months ago
That's the first thing that has made me regret losing my skin piece
Viewer8472 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
statisically men who are circumsized have a reduced risk of stds in males in an uncircumcised male the risk of a uti is 1 in 100 in a circumcised male the risk is 1 in 1000 this is in a book called your babys first year week by week there are way more benefits than that too
19chevyboy86 2 years ago
@19chevyboy86 if you wear a condom its 1:1
dave1233345 2 years ago 2
But how in the world does cutting off a tiny piece of skin even protect against STDs. The only thing this does is make cleaning of the penis more managable but in the end what does this circumsized person really lose?
ultimatelionhearttv 1 year ago
@ultimatelionhearttv "what does this circumsized person really lose?" - Most of the sensitivity in their penis! I'd rather spend a second or two in the shower, retracting my foreskin, than be partially emasculated! The foreskin is a double layered structure that has an area, in the adult, of 12-15 square inches. The evidence for STD protection is contradictory and plagued by junk science. The only sure protection is abstinence or the use of condoms. This is preferable to genital mutilation.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@19chevyboy86
The reduced risk of infections is documented by the AMA but only in the first year. All other benefits receive no credence by the AMA. This aspect is NOT a reason to perform ANY surgery, but only something to consider if you yourself are contemplating the procedure for yourself. As the AMA states "There are no indications to recommend circumcision in the neonatal period". We need to consider that the boy may not want this done to him. I know I didn't want it but I was not asked.
lochinvar00465 1 year ago
Very well said!
0213742300 2 years ago 2
Please if you may. Watch the entire movie Whose body, whose rights there is a history of circ. reliable info. It divided into 6 pieces, please watch them if you may and if you wish send me a comment. Whose body, whose rights
Cameronec 2 years ago 10
Thank you, I have watched it and loved it.
seyxlondon 2 years ago
Jewdoctors took mah foreskin :[ I WANT IT BACK NAO!
MrBlandMan 2 years ago 6
thre is a foreskin restoration procedure. google it.
hitoco9 2 years ago 5
omg i dont want it done now!!!!
MagicMoose18 2 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you for all the information!!
carlasue88 2 years ago
Thanks for speaking out and educating people!
aquarius1986 2 years ago 19
:) very informative video
thank U
flyeesha 2 years ago 7
I'm so glad you posted this. The foreskin is every bit as vital to a male's full sexual experience as the clitoral hood and labia minora are to a female's. In fact they are the SAME tissue until three months' gestation.
Foreskin feels REALLY good. HIS body, HIS decision.
TLCTugger 2 years ago 22
Beautifully said.
As more people wake up to what an abomination circumcision of children is many are speaking out against it. Thank you.
Bonobo3D 2 years ago 10
Comment removed
Bonobo3D 2 years ago