Added: 2 years ago
From: Bereleco
Views: 30,018
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyone have piano sheet?

  • I think you will find that it is Isobel Paraphrasing Marx and Engels

  • @dfserafine No, it's definitely Sarah not Isobel.

  • A great song, thougn I am wondering what this song has to do with Marx & Engels.

  • the outro sounds a bit like Erik Satie, sounds like autumn and it's beautiful!

  • my favorite B & S song.

  • @sunsplash1980 shhhh....(wispers) mine too.

  • queen anyone?

  • que dulce ahhhhhhhhh

  • Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful

  • this makes me sad.

  • At 1:45 Sarah paraphrases Marx and Engels in the background, singing: "The bourgeois, historically, has played a revolutionary part to end all feudal, idyllic relationships.

    It has resolved personal worth and, in place of freedom, is exploitation for profit alone.

    There is a spectre of the past in my bold assertion.

    We could learn much from the past."

    Sarah has written that she sings "destroyed" instead of "resolved," but I can't hear it - I think she's misremembering.

  • Interesting quote. And true - revolutions like the English "revolution" of 1641 and the French and American revolutions were definitely led by the affluent middle class and certain aristocrats (although this changed quickly in France and in America there were no aristocrats per se)and targetted monarchies and the organic feudal relationships kings had with even their poorest subjects...but I though Marx and Engels also praised this revolt as it would utimately lead to "communism" in the end.

  • @brutuscassius1 @brutuscassius1 You're right, I think: that's the point of real historical thinking--every revolution is praiseworthy, even a bourgeois one, since every tectonic shift in history is a shift toward progress--the bourgeois economic arrangement of life's bad, though the revolution that brought it about is good--only because the former's stagnant, the latter was change.

  • @falstaffswims: funny how the whigs (and perhaps by extension the modern neo-conservatives) and communists share a view of history as progess. Tories, traditional tories, focus instead on organic roots and attempt to move forward with reference to the past.

  • @LtBlue14 Perhaps she sings 'destroyed' live?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more