Origins of Man Bonus Evidence II Part 3

[womblewandering]

There is not a shred of evidence for evolution.

The pre-requisites for being an academic scientist are to be braindead and gutless.

[eyez1227]

they just discovered that t-rex had feathers. so this guy is wrong.

[doNOTvoteCAMPAIGN]

Absolutely fantastic that someone is ruffling the feathers of the old guard at last. At last! Thank you so very much for posting this valuable series. Peace. Smth

[sobes55]

classic cunt

[BOULDERDP]

@sobes55 LOL I like your no nonsense to-the-point metaphor. 

[5tonyvvvv]

@BOULDERDP "This engineered RNA" would break down do to the unstable conditions of it..similar to rats leaving a sinking ship..This artificial RNA..has ZERO chance of further evolving into a living cell.

Activated subunits are used along with templates taken from living sources..its not a geochemical relevant reaction.Intelligence created life not time and chance!!!, Information cant come from a primordial broth!

[BOULDERDP]

Creationist propaganda. What an idiot. At 8:30 Darwin did NOT have reservations about his theory, he had reservations about how his theory would be accepted. He had these reservations for 20 years before he wrote the book. Your making this too easy.

[sobes55]

@BOULDERDP thank you, this guy is a tool

[Amorphustruth]

Oh my god i remember being told this moth nonsense at school....AWWW i wish i had been armed with this knowledge then.

Love the way bow tie man explains this.

[JavierC1972]

The Peppered Moth example is indeed a pretty darn powerful one against Darwin's theory. I remember in the university the professor expounded upon the accepted theory of natural selection using the Peppered Moth phenomenon as the shining example. I had NO idea how wrong and flawed that example was until right now. Wow.

[mystisme]

this guy most be a stupiud creationist evolution can be very fast in some time or very slow it depens of many factors

[Misha980]

@mystisme I think you were referring to micro-evolution. Never have we observed a macro-evolution.

[mystisme]

@Misha980 i mean both of them could aplly but something the change can be fast or slow process look at bateries they change very fast even butterfly but to change over time for an eample to another kind of insect could take longer

[Amorphustruth]

@mystisme ...nonsense...complete and absolute.

[mystisme]

@Amorphustruth none sence? educate yourself bateria got a mutation thas why there is sras ,erv,sarm ect/why do you thing we have diferent mammelian cause the first commun source diferrenciate over time to give all kind of animals

[Amorphustruth]

@mystisme I am very well educated thanks, during the process I also learnt to think for myself ...and how to spell.

[mystisme]

@Amorphustruth lern??? so much for spelling.well at least i try to write in english wich is not my mother languages,i am french

[Amorphustruth]

@mystisme What the fuck are you talking about you french imbicile, stick to preaching about your own language...because i did not use 'lern' in any of my posts.

Your english writing and spelling is terrible, whoever told you it wasn't lied to you.

Also if i were you i would get my eyes checked, you seem to be partially blind too!

Won't be reading anymore of your replies 'cause you are clearly the worst kind of fool.

[mystisme]

@Amorphustruth i do not wonder why we call english square head you do not think rondfully dum dum

[sobes55]

@mystisme after having to read your shitty english over and over to comprehend its meaning, it appears you are both arguing the case for evolution against each other. your snail picking thumb is obviously embedded rather vividly in your own rectum, which would lead to such an oversight. if anyone is dum (spelt dumb you cretin) it certainly may be you, another conspiracy of french arrogance and unintelligence, that my theory squarepantalons

[mystisme]

as i say you re a scarehead you prouve it