I have alot of respect for the SAS. To me they are surely in the top 3 best SF in the world. However me being an American i have to stick with my Delta, Seals, Rangers, AF Pararescue and Force Recon. Much respect from the USA!
@Warismyfuture Pfft, we all know that the Aussie SASR is the best. It is evident in the fact that the CIA has sent the SASR on missions before the wars even started. In Vietnam, the CIA sent an Australian Army soldier with Special Forces training (presumably SASR) named Barry Petersen to train a local village to disrupt the viet cong. He was there way before the Americans and Aussies were. He was eventually marked on the hit list of the CIA when he refused orders to turn the ...
@Warismyfuture villagers into assassins. He was believed to have commanded his own personal army of 1300 soldiers, he was also annointed as a demi-god. In Afghanistan and Iraq, before the war on terror even started, the CIA got the SASR to conduct reconnaissance missions to gather intel on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. The reasons that were stated why they chose the SASR were that they are one of the most efficient SF in the world, the best in recon and better than the American SF
The Military and American politicians (Gen PETREUS, CLINTON ANS OBAMA) write in secret documents published by Wikileaks that: "The British soldiers are just cowards, drunkards, homosexuals. Ravines Rabbits in their bases paying the Taliban out of cowardice. The U.S. removed Sangin to the British, and control of Helmand. "
The Military and American politicians write in secret documents published by Wikileaks that: "The British soldiers are just cowards, drunkards, homosexuals. Ravines Rabbits in their bases paying the Taliban out of cowardice. The U.S. removed Sangin to the British, and control of Helmand. "
Bet you havent served a single day in your countries military,nothing but a Youtube keyboard warrior,If you had you'd have alot more respect for the British Army and thier proffessionalism ,read "Attack State RED" Col Kemp or Get your arse on the BBC I Player and watch "OUR WAR -10 YEARS IN AFGHANISTAN- AMBUSHED" and then try and call British soldiers Cowards,
The French Army has nothing half the Calibre of the British Squaddie-your nothing but a Troll
Gen Petreus was a jumped up,arrogant,disrespectful twat and ended up eating his words, after deploying to Sangin with over twice the number of troops the British had,they lost large numbers of troops, in Oct 2010 the equivalent of 1 marine died a day,also sadly lost 9 men over just a 4 day period,at one stage was even losing ground the British army had previously held and deployed back into bases British soldiers once occupied
@GrandeurFrancaise alright u yank, the british are sooooo much better than your shi*ty army. youve killed so many hostages and civilians......and you shoot so many british tanks cause your abit retarded
Sorry but how can you slag off one of the most famous and respected special forces oufits in the world when your own countries most famous army regiment (the foriegn legion) is made up of mostly of bloody eastern European mercinaries and not Frenchmen lol, run along boy
@GrandeurFrancaise This reminds me of a riddle: How many french soldiers does it take to effectively defend Paris? Noone knows, it's never been attempted. ;)
@GrandeurFrancaise I love the fact that you call us Brits retarded when you yourself can't even spell. I marvel at your courage for representing your countries Intelligence Quota. The irony is unrivaled :)
@fatbelly123456 owh really? then how u gonna explain SAS sent 8 SAS army and killed more than 200 taliban? thats the ratio of 8 : 200...do the math mr taliban...
used to using contingency planning and generalizations of their enemy target's. Anyone who would be able to strategically get them in a position where they are at disadvantage would most likely be able to eliminate all SAS operatives. They are a far cry from the invincible, elite super-commandoes, that people make them out to be.
To all the people who think the sas are SUPER soldiers capable of anything, you should check your reality concerned perception. While they may be a part of the worlds elite class fighting outfit, they are far from the overestimates that people believe them to be. They are just experienced, over trained, veteran's with acess to none-standard equipment along with specialized training in different skills. Any force that is capable of unconventional warfaren will outwit them because they are
no one thinks they are invinceible but they are the fittest best trained best equipped millitary unit on the face of the planet.
what do you mean by unconventional warfare? if you are talkin about terrorist organizations that is what the sas was formed to combat and that is what the sas do best this has been proven on many occasions and no one is well trained enough to outwit the sas the only way to beat them is to catch them off guard and that would be an achievement
think of it like this..every one run but theres running and then theres Olympic runners...anyone can shoot a gun and fight...then theres the SAS (same for other special forces)
My apologies. My first comment did not appear for some reason, so it just jumps straight into the battle royal line, so several lines before that are missing.
"fluteinthebum" is so stupid idiot he don't respect the youtube and he is came from Cote 'd Ivoire Africa, he is a gay monkey who also infected by HIV/AIDS he loves to suck big cocks he loves also to pissed his mouth because he is a garbage and you all youtube users we must unite and fight this stupid idiot ignorant fucking gay name "fluteinthebum" who always commenting negative in youtube what he did is a demons work.. FUCK THAT GAY MONKEY! PIG!
by the way thekria. it want the americans it was the britsh that invaded india and all ure pish countries. america was barley a country then. by fuck but, we have done it again. keep hittin and runnin, its all u muslim fuckin fagotts can do
It's not like the SAS are Gods though, 'cause they don't always succeed in all their operations, even on the Homelands (well, home nations anyway).
The I.R.A, for example, killed more SAS than any other para-military and the SAS where easily founded out by them. There are other occasions but that's the best example. They are an excellent force, yeah, but they're not perfect.
the s.a.s had to take part in "the det" or "14th intelligence unit" was an intelligence unit operating in ireland it was all about surveillance. this was not part of the special service. it was only when northen ireland came in that they decided it was a regiment career requirement to take part in. they were'nt aloud to b soilders in there full potential. All you heard about was there failures never all there successes!
Seriously man were you get your facts The SAS are the best in the world its fact not opinion. And I have never heard of the SAS ever failing so were you have heard about the IRA killing SAS is definitely questionable its most likely typically IRA bullshit coming back from killing innocent people and claiming they were SAS or killing a copper as he is walking home and claiming him as a SAS very rarely would a unprofessional force kill these boys they are the best and are feared by all terroists
You've got a lot to learn, they wouldn't really be special operations forces if they went about giving details about their missions, in fact, the SAS have been around since WW2 and the world only heard about them during the Embassy incident. You have to be really dumb, for want of a better word, to think that in it's 70-80 years in operation, they never suffered losses both tactically and in human lives. And you also clearly don't know terrorists, you think suicide bombers are afraid of the SAS?
You have to be really dumb to type some of the things you have I never disputed the time the SAS has been in operation even though everyone nearly knows they were formed in the WW2 from a commando unit. Your being ridiculous course the SAS have lost soldiers but they have always done the job I was stating that Ive never heard of them fail. The missions these men do are perilous which most over countries wouldnt even attempt so yes there the best and you have allot to learn before you comment
and i was stating that you never heard of them fail because they never tell anyone if they failed. for all we know they might only have succeeded in the embassy and the other high profile missions, the other, at a guess, 200 or so missions we dont know about could have went either way. i think its safe to assume that britain has more specialized forces than the SAS, just like America would have more than Delta.
Yes of course Special Forces try to conceal there activities etc but in some cases it isnt possible such as the embassy siege. And yes if you do want to know the IRA which are terrorists are scared of the SAS it was known throughout the times of the troubles cause the SAS hunted them down and laid traps for them and the IRA werent used to fighting soldiers were they are ready and waiting there style of fighting was shooting a soldier or copper whilst his back turned or going home from work
actually there have been numorous daylight raids against police and army barracks and many shootouts between the IRAs and the UDR and Brit army, tghe most recent as nasarene (spelling plz) barracks nd even these vids detail a barracks attack. i recommend reading the Provisional IRA book by Eamonn Mallie, the PIRA almost seem neccisary, although they were terrorists, the Brit army, UDR and the countless Loyalist and Unionist paramilitarys killing republicans indiscrimatly were terrorists too.
Not sure why your telling me this as we were talking about the SAS but anyways Ive never defended any paramilitary. But the British army are not terrorists and if you believe that bloody Sunday rubbish your simply looking for some reason for killing British troops. I assure you that bloody Sunday was the IRAs fault how do I know this cause I know well one of the paras that went in that day he swears on his kids lifes that they were shooting at gunmen not civilians regardless of what they say.
Ever heard of collusion, allowing people to murder others? The UDR, the main force in the British forces posted in Northern Ireland, allowed paramilitaries to kill innocents. The British Army has killed just as many innocents as the British Army and yes rapists and car jackers and drug dealers dont count as innocents. There are many places the IRA had to be the police simply because the RUC (Royal Ulster Constabulatory) refused to police them, I'm talking about 25% of Belfast.
The sad truth is the IRA dont fight for Ireland no more its full of gangsters etc they may of had cause when they began as the British were in there country but now they kill for their own gains not Irelands. The fact is Ireland is independent they have their own country now so why they still fighting its ridiculous the people in northern Ireland want to be British not Irish the same as the republicans dont want to be British so to be honest the whole IRA cause is contradicting.
That's because the real IRA, sdorry, the True IRA (PIRA) have laid down their weapons. The Real IRA aren't the IRA at all, yes, they are gangsters and they are fighting for their own greed if anything. Ireland is not independant. It is part of the Great Briain. It flys a Union Jack. Maybe you didn't notice? And no, the people in Northern Ireland do not want to be British. Half do, the other half dont. well, it's more like 55/45 pro-union, but look at Irelan and it's more like 15/85 pr0-union.
First of all what part of Ireland are you living in because south does not have British flag's they have the green white orange flag and they are an independent nation.
The thing is that the Irish dont have claim to northern Ireland the British ruled Ireland for nearly the whole duration of the empire existed the Irish left their lands to fight for others countries instead of their own its no good making out its their country now should we have the Romans returning to Britain claiming Britain as theres its totally ridiculous you have a country so whats the problem history isnt a good cause to take lifes or we would all be at war.
They wouldn't have a problem with being British of it wasn't for the fact that Britain treated them like shit for almost 800 years. They weren't allowed to pray, own horses, belong to a religion. They're homes were just given to the highest bidder from the plantations when they were killed by the redcoats. Maybe you should look at it this way: the reason the Irish are called the Niggers of Europe is because they were. And guess who the KKK was? The True IRA is the Black Panthers of Ireland.
Dont be ridiculous the IRA regardless if its the IRA the real IRA or I cant believe its not the IRA they still all kill innocent people. And once again you dont read what I have wrote I said the IRA had cause when they began but they all turned into murdering killers. And thats not correct at all northern Ireland has more pro British then pro republican and that is fact and what you on about Ireland doesnt fly the union jack northern Ireland dose because its part of Britain whats wrong with that
well, maybe you should learn to read. i didnt say that there are more pro-republican than pro-unionist in Northern Ireland, I said in Ireland as a whole. why do you think Northern Ireland was created in the first place? the 6 counties in Northern Ireland also just happened to be the 6 counties in ALL of Ireland to have a protestant majority. Northern Ireland was set up to give a massive minority a massive majority, and dats fact.
That first sentance didnt make much sense could you rephase?
to add, i know the RIRA (that is not the True IRA) is a bunch of thugs and stuff, and you keep saying that the IRA killed innocent people you may aswell stop with that arguement because so did every other faction in Northern Ireland.
There is no point trying to prove something to me when I know more about it than you and I dont mean that like you are ignorant i mean it like you need to live in Ireland to fully understand the history behind the Troubles, it was a long time coming.
well actually I was applying for the northern Ireland police force so yes i did need to know allot about the troubles its part of the requirement. Ok all paramilitarys are bad including all IRAs and the unionist ones as well but if the IRA apply tactics like they are there are of course going to be groups forming against them so if anything the IRA have dug a bigger hole for themselves proving they arent better in any way. By the way the British dont gun down innocent civilians on purpose fact
Yeah but they break the rules and do it anyway. Maybe not on purpose, but they've shot many innocents on purpose believing them to be IRA men, who are almost never armed out of service, and they receive no visual of a weapon, but shoot anyway. Almost always they turn out to be civilians. Many of these incidents have occured within a mile of me, the British army killed more innocents than the IRA and thats a fact. The only innocents the IRA killed were killed by complete accident...
... and despite the warnings that the IRA always issued before a bombing, telling where the bomb is going to be and what time to not be near it, the Army felt it was better to leave the bombs unchecked, and thus economic targets became killings because of British Army collusion.
Again you get it wrong. The UVF was set up to combat Home Rule, back in the 20s and the PIRA was set up in the 50s although didnt act notably until the 70s. The Troubles were started by the UDA after they bombed...
... a power plant and tried to frame the IRA. Fact is that the IRA was really put into action because of the Bloody Sunday incident, the burning Catholics out of homes by the Protestants (although in retaliation of the Catholic retaliation towards Bloody Sunday), led by a UDR (Ulster Defence Regiment) charge into Catholic areas while leaving the Protestant rioters to follow them into the Catholic Areas.
The Brit army was welcome in Catholic areas, people offered them tea ffs, but...
... once they put internment on, arrest without warrant or trial, and arrested 497 catholics out of 500 people arrested, then they weren't welcome and the IRA ended up defending the areas. Seriously I recommend reading the Provisional IRA book it's a really good source on this subject.
yeah as i have said they had cause in the beginning but what youre talking about there was before the second world war its way to far back in history to still be fighting bout it today so it had nothing to do with the current government and more importantly nothing to do with the poor soldiers and policemen getting gunned down for no reason and it simply isnt worth the death and suffering they put on their own people and others think its time for everyone to grow up Ireland is independent
What Im talking about was right up until 2001 and there is still paramilitary violence even today and I mean today as right now there is riots going on in North Belfast because of the Orange Marches, which is like a big fuck you to catholics, going through a catholic area.
Stop with the saying poor policemen and soldiers fact is the soldiers posted in Northern Ireland's biggest threat to their lives was the IRA and the biggest threat to the people's lives shouldnt have been the British Forces
Where do you think Ireland is independant? Look up any map of Britain and guess what? Northern Ireland is in it and yes, Northern Ireland is part of Ireland but the British can't see that. I'm having to correct you almost every time you comment now it's getting really bad but I can't blame you for that the Troubles aren't exactly something you learn in your history class you just get told the IRA done this and that but not what the Army did and the RUC and UDR and the UVF and the LVF and the UDA
You must be joking im sick of hearing bout the IRA side of the problem. As I have said you have no claim to northern Ireland no more its a pointless loss of life if you go back in history you could lay claim to most land should America give their land back to its true owners no didnt think so. You never have to correct me cause unlike you i alwayslook at both sides of the story but in this case the Irish are as much to blame as the British no point in fighting cause as the saying goes itshistory
Unlike me, you look up both sides of the story? Well, since we're only talking about the IRA (one side of the story), lets discuss the Loyalist paramilitaries then. For example, the Shankill Butchers, or maybe even Johnny 'Maddog' Adair, or the C18, or the burning of Ardoyne?
The other side of the story killed over 200 people and only 12 IRA members yet it claimed "if you cant kill an IRA member, kill a fenian (derogitory term for Catholics, equal to nigger) " That's the other side to this.
And ok then say we did give back northern Ireland tomorrow what would happen to the people who want to be British they would still be fighting as there being forced to be part of something they dont want to which your complaining about in the first place the IRA would claim a huge victory and it would prove to the world murdering people is the right way to solve problems as I say the IRA have made it impossible for northern Ireland to ever be the same again sorry but thats the way things are
Then the Republic would annex Northern Ireland. That was the agreement between the ROI and Britain, if the British couldn't maintain Northern Ireland, then the Republic would send their army across the border and for most of the 70s they had a massive force of tanks and APCs waiting to cross the border. The pro-Brits had nothing to combat them except a few submachine guns.
The IRA brought equality. That's the simple fact. It took force to achieve more in 30 years than 800 years of peace.
so what your saying is that if Britain left northern Ireland the Irish republic would begin forcing occupation upon the pro British left in northern Ireland with tanks and apcs not sure Ireland has much of a army in any sense of the word. But anyways Britain has tanks etc but they dont use them on IRA etc so how could the Irish republic subdue the pro brutish inhabitance with tanks etc it would be the same as the troubles but reversed. Your being ridiculous pointless trying to discussthiswithyou
Oh sorry I forgot that the UDA had tanks my bad. What would unionist locals do? Throw bricks at tanks? I was thinking the same thing from a while back because you clearly know nothing about the Troubles I feel like I'm talking to the average Brit who feels the IRA attacked them when they probably have never had an Army rifle in their face. Only the Brits seem to believe they are the ones in the right. Every other country in the world says Ireland for the Irish it's simple.
your joking only the Irish think there the innocent ones and they have no blame sounds like Im taking to a average idiot who wants a good reason for the IRA to butcher people we own northern Ireland sorry but thats life you dont like it tough thats the way it is and always will be you havent a army to attack with and if you did you know the British army could destroy all the military on Ireland you wouldnt stand a chance so Im sorry for your bruised pride but give up will you.
If its an all out battle royal your looking for then the SAS would win. But they have lost men to the IRA. Just because they are better trained and equipped does not make them invulnerable. This talk is pointless anyway. The IRA are gone, extinct, finished, deceased, whatever. All thats left are 'dissidents'. Idiots who have no idea what happened and just want to glorify themselves. They can claim to be whoever they want, it doesn't make it true.
Howevor, you can not expect to conquer a country(which involves plenty of killing innocents) and not expect retaliation. No innocents deserve to be killed, whatever their affiliations.
The worst of it, though is that the entire movement ceased to be a real fight for freedom and just became a bloody religious feud, between catholics and protestants, were everyone was just instantly, despite the fact that their had been many Irish revolutionaries of both religions. Neither the Irish nor British 'people are to blame however. The blame rests on long dead monarchs and polititions. And governments in the recent past.
We know what the Unionist groups did. Perhaps you fail to see that if people in N.I are willing to fight against oppression from Eire.
In fact the majority of people don't want to be apart of Eire. They don't give a flying fuck about geographical issues. Its not hoe the world works I am afraid. Its what the people there want and how far they are wiling to go.
Northern Ireland chose to be British through the force Unionist groups put into it to remain so.
The thing is the majority of people in northern Ireland want to be British so they have that right so how come the IRA who supposedly fought to rid of oppression now want to impose it upon people it doesnt make sense the sad truth is northern Ireland will always be British from now on if they did most of their fighting democratically then this may of come true but murdering people gunning down policemen who are just going to work they made it impossible for Ireland to be whole again.
what majority? it's like 55% thats not a majority thats an above average. 45% of the people of Northern Ireland is still alot of people and again you are only going on polls and ballots that were boycotted by the pro-republicans because they know they wouldnt win because Northern Ireland is a state that was set up to give a pro-union majority that doesnt exist.
What you're saying is that the most legitimate claim doesnt count and that only the voice of sectarianism does...
... because it's simple: protestants hated catholics because most Irish were catholics, and vice-versa. Fact is, Britain didnt and does not have an agenda in Ireland. What you are saying is that just because there is slightly more pro-brits than pro-republicans in Northern Ireland, Britain has a right to treat the Irish like shit for 700 years and the Irish aren't allowed to do shit back. If you ask my opinion, if the pro-brits want to be British, why dont they just fuck off to Britain then?
wait on you dont believe everything on the internet do you anyone could make a website and state figures about deaths etc. But anyways a minuet ago you were saying the SAS keep to themselves so now they are giving us body counts of their dead now yes or come on and no I havent looked at those websites cause I respect any soldier but still you havent answered the last comment I said that of course they have lost men but I stated I have never heard of them failing etc
Well the first SAS mission wasnt a failure at all they took substantial losses but they did do the mission which was to destroy as many aircraft as they sat on the airstrip as possible which they did. And bravo 2 zero werent a failure they were told to search and destroy and basically cause any damage towards Iraqi forces which once again they did on a massive scale. You seem to be confusing failure with taking losses which isnt true along as the job is done you have succeeded.
So yes you agree the first mission was a success. and bravo 2 zero was successful if you want to know there is a video on YouTube of the bombing run on the scud which was painted by the SAS on the ground thats destroying a scud. Plus they also destroyed various equipment used for the scuds.
I guess you don't know what a Pyrass victory is, and I don't know where you are getting your info about Bravo Two Zero because during the mission the Scuds were not destroyed.
Hence why the SAS soldiers were asked what they were doing there. If the Scuds were blown up the answer to that question kinda would've been obvious.
Not necessarily they could of had a more important objective and any enemy captive will be integrated for as much information as possible not just one area of their mission they will ask who sanctioned it etc. But it is fact they blew up scuds there is a video of it on this website cant tell you its name but I swear its on. And by the way they were told to find the scuds and paint them for airstrikes not personally destroy them but as I say they did.
The Scuds were never blown up. They found markers that they believed would lead them to the scuds, but because it was night and the temperature was below freezing they decided to wait until the next day when they were compromised.
They never painted the scuds, they didn't have any communications at all during the mission due to Mcnabb not relizing they had brought faulty equipment
I assure you some scuds were destroyed by the SAS in desert storm positive 100% no doubt at all. Its sods law I wont find it like type in on Google history of bravo 2 zero and its on the first website I think. But as I say their goal was changed during the mission from making as much havoc in the Iraqi army as possible to locating scuds which I assure you they did destroy scuds during the mission.
you idiot one sas could wipe out 20 ira infact in iraq one sas soldier killed 20 taliban with a knife and you think the ira could kill sas like that bullshit
It doesnt matter how good you are, an SAS caught off guard staring down a 3 year old with an AK-47 is going to die plain and simple, there are no heroes on a battlefield, what could be the best soldier could be dead purly by luck/unluck
@Snagprophet lol i was thinking the same thing as soon as a Taliban soldier sees a SAS soldier the Taliban soldier will run away or kill himself or just get shot right in the head by the SAS soldier
@GrandeurFrancaise oh look its a yank......shut it ok your specail forces are as good as sh*t, u tried 2 save a british hostage and u used a grenade and killed her !!!
and by the way we donn,t need ur fucking second hand aircrafts who can only bomb innocent people. We ll crush ur chocklate cream soldiers with only ak 47 and u ll see in coming years.
A) who said i was american?. B) i don't agree with any war even though iv'e been to one,have you? C) "we learned your language"?what ENGLISH originates in pakistan now does it?,well done fool. D)your country does buy our aircraft and as of second hand weapons,arent ak47s from russia?you wont be crushing any one with an ak47 thats why you plant ied at roadsides like little girls
oh and E) "and by the way we donn,t need ur fucking second hand aircrafts who can only bomb innocent people. We ll crush ur chocklate cream soldiers with only ak 47 and u ll see in recent years" i know thats what you deleted cos how can you see in recent years haha "youll see" is future "recent years" is past dumb fuck,you sure you can load your magazine into the breach of your ak now brain box haha
these britans donn,t learn anything from history. They can never win war from brave people of afghanistan if you donn,t believe me you will see in coming years.
yeah,why you speaking english and looking at our spec ops?why you lot plague every corner in the uk with a shop?if your country is so comfortable why dont u all stay put?cos its a shit hole thats why,and your second hand aircraft are no match for u.k. and u.s. now are they,not including the "brave people" in tiny teams taking out whole platoons of desert rats
These were not us who enter in ur country first.You came in subcontinent before 300 years ago u learned our language. u sick people destroyed our culture.We donnot forget our revenge its in our blood so now we ll fuck ur country like what u sick people r doing in afghanistan now.
You hate americans but you use an american based website...You hairy pieces of garbage...You are the killers of the innocent. How many women and children are victims of your "revenge" attacks. We don't need to kill ourselves to get laid but you all chase your virgins to allah. Get a clue dude...Not everyone can have a million virgins waiting for them.
He will find out the only virgin will be his virgin ass when satan is climbing on it after he blows himself up along with innocent people of his own kind.:)
Im English and i wont have you say that about our american brothers the uk and usa are fucking pakistan up the arse right now it wont be long before we have just about enough of you and your petty religion and deside to wipe you of the face of the earth for england and its kingsmen and for america
Vikingodin...I think you just became my favorite person in the ENTIRE world. Thank you for telling that scum bag off the way he should have been. Where/ when did you serve?
only missions not the existence of them,you can apply to join em after 3 years in the forces,although most guys go from parachute regiment and other elite units,the SBS must be fuckin tough they have a 90% failure rate to join
SB only accept applications from The Royal Marine Commando Units... ( M&AWC etc...) All other applicants need not apply. Just thought i'd let you know.
I may be outta date now fella.. It was back in the late unpleasantness for me... (1984 >) They only recruited, as far as I was aware from RM. May have changed now... haha... Everything else has, including my waisteline ffs! haha!
90% fail rate in all uk sf,not just sbs soz,also to be eligible sbs for selection, a candidate must be male, and must have have served in the military for at least 18 months and have 3 years left to serve.and its first i heard when you said what you said :)
Lt. Col. Robert Blair Mayne DSO. 11/01/1915 - 14/12/1955 SAS Superman in the flesh! Read the book - SAS WARRIOR.
strongarmofthepaw 7 months ago
S.A.S - Speed . Agression. Suprise
und33dwarrior 8 months ago
I have alot of respect for the SAS. To me they are surely in the top 3 best SF in the world. However me being an American i have to stick with my Delta, Seals, Rangers, AF Pararescue and Force Recon. Much respect from the USA!
Warismyfuture 8 months ago
@Warismyfuture Pfft, we all know that the Aussie SASR is the best. It is evident in the fact that the CIA has sent the SASR on missions before the wars even started. In Vietnam, the CIA sent an Australian Army soldier with Special Forces training (presumably SASR) named Barry Petersen to train a local village to disrupt the viet cong. He was there way before the Americans and Aussies were. He was eventually marked on the hit list of the CIA when he refused orders to turn the ...
daaskapital1 7 months ago
@Warismyfuture villagers into assassins. He was believed to have commanded his own personal army of 1300 soldiers, he was also annointed as a demi-god. In Afghanistan and Iraq, before the war on terror even started, the CIA got the SASR to conduct reconnaissance missions to gather intel on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. The reasons that were stated why they chose the SASR were that they are one of the most efficient SF in the world, the best in recon and better than the American SF
daaskapital1 7 months ago
Where is this from ?
Britishpara 8 months ago
the british cowards have paid the taliban........
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
Comment removed
funkyfenman 8 months ago
@funkyfenman BECAUSE WE WANT TO SEE HOW POOR ARE YOU AND THE WRONG WAY TO MAKE WAR OPERARION.
OUR NUCLEAR SUBMARINE HAS CRASCED YOUR MISERABLE HMS ASTUTE
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
In 2007 over a 6 month period one British infantry Regt fought toe to toe with the Taliban, they sadly 9 brave men died but 1018+ Taliban was killed,
It was the Taliban who was taught a lessson gobshite,now run along your starting to look stupid
funkyfenman 8 months ago
@funkyfenman
RETARDED BROKEN IN ASS. BRITISH HOOLIGAN
WHICH HONPUR FIGHITING AGAINS SE GOATS FUCKETS TALIBANS?
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
@funkyfenman HAVE YOU ENDED THE MONEY TO PAY TALIBANS?
HAVEN'T KEEP YOU THE MONEY OF THE IRON SOLD AFTER THE SCRAPPING OF HMS ARK ROYAL?
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Military and American politicians (Gen PETREUS, CLINTON ANS OBAMA) write in secret documents published by Wikileaks that: "The British soldiers are just cowards, drunkards, homosexuals. Ravines Rabbits in their bases paying the Taliban out of cowardice. The U.S. removed Sangin to the British, and control of Helmand. "
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
BRITISH RETARDED AND BROKEN IN ASS
BRITISH ARE SO NSTUPID THAT THEY KILL TOGHETAR FOR THE WC...AHAHAHAH
LIKE THEY DONE IN THE HMS ASTUTE SUBMARINE AHAHAHAQAHAH
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
UK = USED KONDOMS
SAS = SODOMITICS ANALED IN SHITHOLE
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
@funkyfenman Our most famous unit is the SEALS or green berets (they are equally famous) not this "foreign legion" you blabber on about!
Awesomechild96 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Military and American politicians write in secret documents published by Wikileaks that: "The British soldiers are just cowards, drunkards, homosexuals. Ravines Rabbits in their bases paying the Taliban out of cowardice. The U.S. removed Sangin to the British, and control of Helmand. "
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
Bet you havent served a single day in your countries military,nothing but a Youtube keyboard warrior,If you had you'd have alot more respect for the British Army and thier proffessionalism ,read "Attack State RED" Col Kemp or Get your arse on the BBC I Player and watch "OUR WAR -10 YEARS IN AFGHANISTAN- AMBUSHED" and then try and call British soldiers Cowards,
The French Army has nothing half the Calibre of the British Squaddie-your nothing but a Troll
funkyfenman 8 months ago
@funkyfenman Sorry for You....is sad know the true....
I've written only what said by Gen Petreus and others.
He has written only the true into secret documents.
Do you remembar what said by uk parliament regardinfìg the crimes of uk soldiers like the bloody sunday?
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
To be honest Bloody Sunday wasnt the British Armies finest hour,but everything that day wasnt black and white,
Dont go down the IRA route,I Served in N/Ireland and will shoot you down in flames
funkyfenman 8 months ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
Gen Petreus was a jumped up,arrogant,disrespectful twat and ended up eating his words, after deploying to Sangin with over twice the number of troops the British had,they lost large numbers of troops, in Oct 2010 the equivalent of 1 marine died a day,also sadly lost 9 men over just a 4 day period,at one stage was even losing ground the British army had previously held and deployed back into bases British soldiers once occupied
the only things the british lacked was numbers
funkyfenman 8 months ago
COWARDS AND CRIMINALS
SAS ARE THE CRIMINALS THAT HAVE KILLED WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN BLOODY SUNDAY
THE PARLIAMENT UK has apologized, shame of cowardice of SAS
GLORY AND HONOUR TO THE IRISH MEN
VIVA IRA
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise alright u yank, the british are sooooo much better than your shi*ty army. youve killed so many hostages and civilians......and you shoot so many british tanks cause your abit retarded
TheBritishRAF 1 year ago
@TheBritishRAF Go do your homework!
Hi USA! Hope to be back later in the year!
UKPatriotsFan 11 months ago
long live the IRA THEY SENT THE s a s back to england in WOODEN BOXES
fatbelly123456 1 year ago
@fatbelly123456 go die
threadgoldc 1 year ago
@fatbelly123456
more like they where sending their kit back in wooden boxes, they dont need their weapons for rookies like the ira
ira = i ran away
benjsy 1 year ago 3
@benjsy
SAS
SODOMITIC
ANALED
SHITHOLE
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
Sorry but how can you slag off one of the most famous and respected special forces oufits in the world when your own countries most famous army regiment (the foriegn legion) is made up of mostly of bloody eastern European mercinaries and not Frenchmen lol, run along boy
funkyfenman 9 months ago
@funkyfenman BRITISH ARE SO RETARDED THAT THE MOST PART OF THE SOLDIERS KILLED WAS MADE BY THE SAME UK.....
LIKE THE SAILORS KILLLED IN THE HMS ASTUTE SUBMARINE
BRITISH RETARDED HAW CAN YOU NAMED ASTUTE A SUBMARINE THAT HAS LOST THE LARGHER PART OF IT'S LIFE STRANDED?
GrandeurFrancaise 8 months ago
@GrandeurFrancaise This reminds me of a riddle: How many french soldiers does it take to effectively defend Paris? Noone knows, it's never been attempted. ;)
TheGnolla 8 months ago
@TheGnolla Nah, the French did pretty good in 1914 at the Battle of the Marne (1st Marne).
Klendathue 7 months ago
@GrandeurFrancaise I love the fact that you call us Brits retarded when you yourself can't even spell. I marvel at your courage for representing your countries Intelligence Quota. The irony is unrivaled :)
Dougalls07 8 months ago
@fatbelly123456 owh really? then how u gonna explain SAS sent 8 SAS army and killed more than 200 taliban? thats the ratio of 8 : 200...do the math mr taliban...
kookahjoon 1 year ago
thats why iraq ,afghanistan,taliban are never ending story......
antimasonics 1 year ago
thats how muc respect rommel commanded unlike modnist who unlike rommel suck the asses of their politicla leader he was a real leader
a soilders leader not a slef glorified heor glory seeking commander like todays he lead on his wits ability and the loyalty of his men
not many commanders come even close to his leadership
the heardset in equals is desert warfer no hiding place clear skys and total war
the hardest of tactical abilites harder than junkle warfare harder than artic warfare
delpha3110 2 years ago
the sas were formed to give a bit of violence to the greta field man rommel
for the lrdg
are you tough enogh
delpha3110 2 years ago
@delpha3110 the LRDG were 90% kiwis =) rommel feared us kiwis
WRH90059 1 year ago
sas terrorising terrorists since ww2
danemreg 2 years ago 5
used to using contingency planning and generalizations of their enemy target's. Anyone who would be able to strategically get them in a position where they are at disadvantage would most likely be able to eliminate all SAS operatives. They are a far cry from the invincible, elite super-commandoes, that people make them out to be.
KurdishKlansman 2 years ago
To all the people who think the sas are SUPER soldiers capable of anything, you should check your reality concerned perception. While they may be a part of the worlds elite class fighting outfit, they are far from the overestimates that people believe them to be. They are just experienced, over trained, veteran's with acess to none-standard equipment along with specialized training in different skills. Any force that is capable of unconventional warfaren will outwit them because they are
KurdishKlansman 2 years ago
no one thinks they are invinceible but they are the fittest best trained best equipped millitary unit on the face of the planet.
what do you mean by unconventional warfare? if you are talkin about terrorist organizations that is what the sas was formed to combat and that is what the sas do best this has been proven on many occasions and no one is well trained enough to outwit the sas the only way to beat them is to catch them off guard and that would be an achievement
youvegotmoobs 2 years ago
think of it like this..every one run but theres running and then theres Olympic runners...anyone can shoot a gun and fight...then theres the SAS (same for other special forces)
englandforever 1 year ago
@englandforever
Thank you.
orgo1968 1 year ago
@KurdishKlansman You talk about over training of the SAS.
Have you served in the 22nd?
What is non standard about an M16 and a Browning 9mm?
Do you know what you are talking about?
Unconventional is not true. Well practised and refined is true.
orgo1968 1 year ago
Long live the SAS, death to the IRA and Al-Quada.
MuscleBeatsImport 2 years ago 60
@MuscleBeatsImport
GOD BLESS THE I.R.A. 's HEROES
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise grow up. get off this video, you dont see us on IRA videos saying god bless the queen.
TotaIChaos 1 year ago
@TotaICha
THAT OLD SLUT SIPHILITIC OF ELIZABET?
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise yeah the one who fucked the IRA
TotaIChaos 1 year ago
@TotaIChaos LIKE TAMPAX CHARLES?
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
Oh man, after watching this video I knew people would be bitching at eachother
zakdagger 2 years ago 3
Rambo @ 0:09
ForgeOracle 2 years ago
My apologies. My first comment did not appear for some reason, so it just jumps straight into the battle royal line, so several lines before that are missing.
TheBronzeAlchemist 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"fluteinthebum" is so stupid idiot he don't respect the youtube and he is came from Cote 'd Ivoire Africa, he is a gay monkey who also infected by HIV/AIDS he loves to suck big cocks he loves also to pissed his mouth because he is a garbage and you all youtube users we must unite and fight this stupid idiot ignorant fucking gay name "fluteinthebum" who always commenting negative in youtube what he did is a demons work.. FUCK THAT GAY MONKEY! PIG!
Rgrodi 2 years ago
Who Dares Wins.
Dragon22873 2 years ago
A bloke called "Al" died during the time "andy mcnabb" was serving with 14th intel. "the det"
1dealsin 2 years ago
by the way thekria. it want the americans it was the britsh that invaded india and all ure pish countries. america was barley a country then. by fuck but, we have done it again. keep hittin and runnin, its all u muslim fuckin fagotts can do
kaltik12 2 years ago
It's not like the SAS are Gods though, 'cause they don't always succeed in all their operations, even on the Homelands (well, home nations anyway).
The I.R.A, for example, killed more SAS than any other para-military and the SAS where easily founded out by them. There are other occasions but that's the best example. They are an excellent force, yeah, but they're not perfect.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
nobodys perfect, but that doesnt make them any less then the best speical forc ein the world
FRAFPDD 2 years ago
Actually the SAS were not allowed to kill IRA terrorists because of the rules of engagement. Less than 3 SAS men lost their lives.
00000Dean00000 2 years ago 3
the s.a.s had to take part in "the det" or "14th intelligence unit" was an intelligence unit operating in ireland it was all about surveillance. this was not part of the special service. it was only when northen ireland came in that they decided it was a regiment career requirement to take part in. they were'nt aloud to b soilders in there full potential. All you heard about was there failures never all there successes!
1dealsin 2 years ago
Seriously man were you get your facts The SAS are the best in the world its fact not opinion. And I have never heard of the SAS ever failing so were you have heard about the IRA killing SAS is definitely questionable its most likely typically IRA bullshit coming back from killing innocent people and claiming they were SAS or killing a copper as he is walking home and claiming him as a SAS very rarely would a unprofessional force kill these boys they are the best and are feared by all terroists
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
You've got a lot to learn, they wouldn't really be special operations forces if they went about giving details about their missions, in fact, the SAS have been around since WW2 and the world only heard about them during the Embassy incident. You have to be really dumb, for want of a better word, to think that in it's 70-80 years in operation, they never suffered losses both tactically and in human lives. And you also clearly don't know terrorists, you think suicide bombers are afraid of the SAS?
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
You have to be really dumb to type some of the things you have I never disputed the time the SAS has been in operation even though everyone nearly knows they were formed in the WW2 from a commando unit. Your being ridiculous course the SAS have lost soldiers but they have always done the job I was stating that Ive never heard of them fail. The missions these men do are perilous which most over countries wouldnt even attempt so yes there the best and you have allot to learn before you comment
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
and i was stating that you never heard of them fail because they never tell anyone if they failed. for all we know they might only have succeeded in the embassy and the other high profile missions, the other, at a guess, 200 or so missions we dont know about could have went either way. i think its safe to assume that britain has more specialized forces than the SAS, just like America would have more than Delta.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
Yes of course Special Forces try to conceal there activities etc but in some cases it isnt possible such as the embassy siege. And yes if you do want to know the IRA which are terrorists are scared of the SAS it was known throughout the times of the troubles cause the SAS hunted them down and laid traps for them and the IRA werent used to fighting soldiers were they are ready and waiting there style of fighting was shooting a soldier or copper whilst his back turned or going home from work
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
actually there have been numorous daylight raids against police and army barracks and many shootouts between the IRAs and the UDR and Brit army, tghe most recent as nasarene (spelling plz) barracks nd even these vids detail a barracks attack. i recommend reading the Provisional IRA book by Eamonn Mallie, the PIRA almost seem neccisary, although they were terrorists, the Brit army, UDR and the countless Loyalist and Unionist paramilitarys killing republicans indiscrimatly were terrorists too.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
Not sure why your telling me this as we were talking about the SAS but anyways Ive never defended any paramilitary. But the British army are not terrorists and if you believe that bloody Sunday rubbish your simply looking for some reason for killing British troops. I assure you that bloody Sunday was the IRAs fault how do I know this cause I know well one of the paras that went in that day he swears on his kids lifes that they were shooting at gunmen not civilians regardless of what they say.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
Ever heard of collusion, allowing people to murder others? The UDR, the main force in the British forces posted in Northern Ireland, allowed paramilitaries to kill innocents. The British Army has killed just as many innocents as the British Army and yes rapists and car jackers and drug dealers dont count as innocents. There are many places the IRA had to be the police simply because the RUC (Royal Ulster Constabulatory) refused to police them, I'm talking about 25% of Belfast.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
"The British Army has killed just as many innocents as the **British Army**"
**IRAs
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
Do not listen to that person the British army is one of the most organised armies in the world they have hearts there not terrorists
mastercheff1216 2 years ago
The sad truth is the IRA dont fight for Ireland no more its full of gangsters etc they may of had cause when they began as the British were in there country but now they kill for their own gains not Irelands. The fact is Ireland is independent they have their own country now so why they still fighting its ridiculous the people in northern Ireland want to be British not Irish the same as the republicans dont want to be British so to be honest the whole IRA cause is contradicting.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
That's because the real IRA, sdorry, the True IRA (PIRA) have laid down their weapons. The Real IRA aren't the IRA at all, yes, they are gangsters and they are fighting for their own greed if anything. Ireland is not independant. It is part of the Great Briain. It flys a Union Jack. Maybe you didn't notice? And no, the people in Northern Ireland do not want to be British. Half do, the other half dont. well, it's more like 55/45 pro-union, but look at Irelan and it's more like 15/85 pr0-union.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
First of all what part of Ireland are you living in because south does not have British flag's they have the green white orange flag and they are an independent nation.
mastercheff1216 2 years ago
The thing is that the Irish dont have claim to northern Ireland the British ruled Ireland for nearly the whole duration of the empire existed the Irish left their lands to fight for others countries instead of their own its no good making out its their country now should we have the Romans returning to Britain claiming Britain as theres its totally ridiculous you have a country so whats the problem history isnt a good cause to take lifes or we would all be at war.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
They wouldn't have a problem with being British of it wasn't for the fact that Britain treated them like shit for almost 800 years. They weren't allowed to pray, own horses, belong to a religion. They're homes were just given to the highest bidder from the plantations when they were killed by the redcoats. Maybe you should look at it this way: the reason the Irish are called the Niggers of Europe is because they were. And guess who the KKK was? The True IRA is the Black Panthers of Ireland.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
Dont be ridiculous the IRA regardless if its the IRA the real IRA or I cant believe its not the IRA they still all kill innocent people. And once again you dont read what I have wrote I said the IRA had cause when they began but they all turned into murdering killers. And thats not correct at all northern Ireland has more pro British then pro republican and that is fact and what you on about Ireland doesnt fly the union jack northern Ireland dose because its part of Britain whats wrong with that
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
well, maybe you should learn to read. i didnt say that there are more pro-republican than pro-unionist in Northern Ireland, I said in Ireland as a whole. why do you think Northern Ireland was created in the first place? the 6 counties in Northern Ireland also just happened to be the 6 counties in ALL of Ireland to have a protestant majority. Northern Ireland was set up to give a massive minority a massive majority, and dats fact.
That first sentance didnt make much sense could you rephase?
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
to add, i know the RIRA (that is not the True IRA) is a bunch of thugs and stuff, and you keep saying that the IRA killed innocent people you may aswell stop with that arguement because so did every other faction in Northern Ireland.
There is no point trying to prove something to me when I know more about it than you and I dont mean that like you are ignorant i mean it like you need to live in Ireland to fully understand the history behind the Troubles, it was a long time coming.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
well actually I was applying for the northern Ireland police force so yes i did need to know allot about the troubles its part of the requirement. Ok all paramilitarys are bad including all IRAs and the unionist ones as well but if the IRA apply tactics like they are there are of course going to be groups forming against them so if anything the IRA have dug a bigger hole for themselves proving they arent better in any way. By the way the British dont gun down innocent civilians on purpose fact
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
Yeah but they break the rules and do it anyway. Maybe not on purpose, but they've shot many innocents on purpose believing them to be IRA men, who are almost never armed out of service, and they receive no visual of a weapon, but shoot anyway. Almost always they turn out to be civilians. Many of these incidents have occured within a mile of me, the British army killed more innocents than the IRA and thats a fact. The only innocents the IRA killed were killed by complete accident...
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
... and despite the warnings that the IRA always issued before a bombing, telling where the bomb is going to be and what time to not be near it, the Army felt it was better to leave the bombs unchecked, and thus economic targets became killings because of British Army collusion.
Again you get it wrong. The UVF was set up to combat Home Rule, back in the 20s and the PIRA was set up in the 50s although didnt act notably until the 70s. The Troubles were started by the UDA after they bombed...
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
... a power plant and tried to frame the IRA. Fact is that the IRA was really put into action because of the Bloody Sunday incident, the burning Catholics out of homes by the Protestants (although in retaliation of the Catholic retaliation towards Bloody Sunday), led by a UDR (Ulster Defence Regiment) charge into Catholic areas while leaving the Protestant rioters to follow them into the Catholic Areas.
The Brit army was welcome in Catholic areas, people offered them tea ffs, but...
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
... once they put internment on, arrest without warrant or trial, and arrested 497 catholics out of 500 people arrested, then they weren't welcome and the IRA ended up defending the areas. Seriously I recommend reading the Provisional IRA book it's a really good source on this subject.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
yeah as i have said they had cause in the beginning but what youre talking about there was before the second world war its way to far back in history to still be fighting bout it today so it had nothing to do with the current government and more importantly nothing to do with the poor soldiers and policemen getting gunned down for no reason and it simply isnt worth the death and suffering they put on their own people and others think its time for everyone to grow up Ireland is independent
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
What Im talking about was right up until 2001 and there is still paramilitary violence even today and I mean today as right now there is riots going on in North Belfast because of the Orange Marches, which is like a big fuck you to catholics, going through a catholic area.
Stop with the saying poor policemen and soldiers fact is the soldiers posted in Northern Ireland's biggest threat to their lives was the IRA and the biggest threat to the people's lives shouldnt have been the British Forces
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
Where do you think Ireland is independant? Look up any map of Britain and guess what? Northern Ireland is in it and yes, Northern Ireland is part of Ireland but the British can't see that. I'm having to correct you almost every time you comment now it's getting really bad but I can't blame you for that the Troubles aren't exactly something you learn in your history class you just get told the IRA done this and that but not what the Army did and the RUC and UDR and the UVF and the LVF and the UDA
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
You must be joking im sick of hearing bout the IRA side of the problem. As I have said you have no claim to northern Ireland no more its a pointless loss of life if you go back in history you could lay claim to most land should America give their land back to its true owners no didnt think so. You never have to correct me cause unlike you i alwayslook at both sides of the story but in this case the Irish are as much to blame as the British no point in fighting cause as the saying goes itshistory
Squire19lUK 2 years ago 4
Unlike me, you look up both sides of the story? Well, since we're only talking about the IRA (one side of the story), lets discuss the Loyalist paramilitaries then. For example, the Shankill Butchers, or maybe even Johnny 'Maddog' Adair, or the C18, or the burning of Ardoyne?
The other side of the story killed over 200 people and only 12 IRA members yet it claimed "if you cant kill an IRA member, kill a fenian (derogitory term for Catholics, equal to nigger) " That's the other side to this.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
And ok then say we did give back northern Ireland tomorrow what would happen to the people who want to be British they would still be fighting as there being forced to be part of something they dont want to which your complaining about in the first place the IRA would claim a huge victory and it would prove to the world murdering people is the right way to solve problems as I say the IRA have made it impossible for northern Ireland to ever be the same again sorry but thats the way things are
Squire19lUK 2 years ago 4
Then the Republic would annex Northern Ireland. That was the agreement between the ROI and Britain, if the British couldn't maintain Northern Ireland, then the Republic would send their army across the border and for most of the 70s they had a massive force of tanks and APCs waiting to cross the border. The pro-Brits had nothing to combat them except a few submachine guns.
The IRA brought equality. That's the simple fact. It took force to achieve more in 30 years than 800 years of peace.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
so what your saying is that if Britain left northern Ireland the Irish republic would begin forcing occupation upon the pro British left in northern Ireland with tanks and apcs not sure Ireland has much of a army in any sense of the word. But anyways Britain has tanks etc but they dont use them on IRA etc so how could the Irish republic subdue the pro brutish inhabitance with tanks etc it would be the same as the troubles but reversed. Your being ridiculous pointless trying to discussthiswithyou
Squire19lUK 2 years ago 3
Oh sorry I forgot that the UDA had tanks my bad. What would unionist locals do? Throw bricks at tanks? I was thinking the same thing from a while back because you clearly know nothing about the Troubles I feel like I'm talking to the average Brit who feels the IRA attacked them when they probably have never had an Army rifle in their face. Only the Brits seem to believe they are the ones in the right. Every other country in the world says Ireland for the Irish it's simple.
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
your joking only the Irish think there the innocent ones and they have no blame sounds like Im taking to a average idiot who wants a good reason for the IRA to butcher people we own northern Ireland sorry but thats life you dont like it tough thats the way it is and always will be you havent a army to attack with and if you did you know the British army could destroy all the military on Ireland you wouldnt stand a chance so Im sorry for your bruised pride but give up will you.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
If its an all out battle royal your looking for then the SAS would win. But they have lost men to the IRA. Just because they are better trained and equipped does not make them invulnerable. This talk is pointless anyway. The IRA are gone, extinct, finished, deceased, whatever. All thats left are 'dissidents'. Idiots who have no idea what happened and just want to glorify themselves. They can claim to be whoever they want, it doesn't make it true.
TheBronzeAlchemist 2 years ago
Howevor, you can not expect to conquer a country(which involves plenty of killing innocents) and not expect retaliation. No innocents deserve to be killed, whatever their affiliations.
TheBronzeAlchemist 2 years ago
The worst of it, though is that the entire movement ceased to be a real fight for freedom and just became a bloody religious feud, between catholics and protestants, were everyone was just instantly, despite the fact that their had been many Irish revolutionaries of both religions. Neither the Irish nor British 'people are to blame however. The blame rests on long dead monarchs and polititions. And governments in the recent past.
TheBronzeAlchemist 2 years ago
We know what the Unionist groups did. Perhaps you fail to see that if people in N.I are willing to fight against oppression from Eire.
In fact the majority of people don't want to be apart of Eire. They don't give a flying fuck about geographical issues. Its not hoe the world works I am afraid. Its what the people there want and how far they are wiling to go.
Northern Ireland chose to be British through the force Unionist groups put into it to remain so.
At least they didn't bomb Eire.
BritGBM 2 years ago 3
Washburn, can i just ask, r u Northern Irish or from Eire? Either i havent read down far enough or u havent said
Fwaenebor 2 years ago
This entire argument betwwen the teo of you is childish and your ignorance in such a serious is insulting.
TheBronzeAlchemist 2 years ago
The thing is the majority of people in northern Ireland want to be British so they have that right so how come the IRA who supposedly fought to rid of oppression now want to impose it upon people it doesnt make sense the sad truth is northern Ireland will always be British from now on if they did most of their fighting democratically then this may of come true but murdering people gunning down policemen who are just going to work they made it impossible for Ireland to be whole again.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
what majority? it's like 55% thats not a majority thats an above average. 45% of the people of Northern Ireland is still alot of people and again you are only going on polls and ballots that were boycotted by the pro-republicans because they know they wouldnt win because Northern Ireland is a state that was set up to give a pro-union majority that doesnt exist.
What you're saying is that the most legitimate claim doesnt count and that only the voice of sectarianism does...
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
... because it's simple: protestants hated catholics because most Irish were catholics, and vice-versa. Fact is, Britain didnt and does not have an agenda in Ireland. What you are saying is that just because there is slightly more pro-brits than pro-republicans in Northern Ireland, Britain has a right to treat the Irish like shit for 700 years and the Irish aren't allowed to do shit back. If you ask my opinion, if the pro-brits want to be British, why dont they just fuck off to Britain then?
WashburnGoddess 2 years ago
You can google SAS soldiers killed and get 30 different links...
Crizzle789 2 years ago
wait on you dont believe everything on the internet do you anyone could make a website and state figures about deaths etc. But anyways a minuet ago you were saying the SAS keep to themselves so now they are giving us body counts of their dead now yes or come on and no I havent looked at those websites cause I respect any soldier but still you havent answered the last comment I said that of course they have lost men but I stated I have never heard of them failing etc
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
The very first SAS mission in history was a failure, and so was Bravo Two Zero.
Crizzle789 2 years ago
Well the first SAS mission wasnt a failure at all they took substantial losses but they did do the mission which was to destroy as many aircraft as they sat on the airstrip as possible which they did. And bravo 2 zero werent a failure they were told to search and destroy and basically cause any damage towards Iraqi forces which once again they did on a massive scale. You seem to be confusing failure with taking losses which isnt true along as the job is done you have succeeded.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
The first SAS mission was a Pyrass victory if you can even call it a victory.
Bravo Two Zero was a failure. The mission was to destroy scud missles which they did not do.
Crizzle789 2 years ago
So yes you agree the first mission was a success. and bravo 2 zero was successful if you want to know there is a video on YouTube of the bombing run on the scud which was painted by the SAS on the ground thats destroying a scud. Plus they also destroyed various equipment used for the scuds.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
I guess you don't know what a Pyrass victory is, and I don't know where you are getting your info about Bravo Two Zero because during the mission the Scuds were not destroyed.
Hence why the SAS soldiers were asked what they were doing there. If the Scuds were blown up the answer to that question kinda would've been obvious.
Crizzle789 2 years ago
Not necessarily they could of had a more important objective and any enemy captive will be integrated for as much information as possible not just one area of their mission they will ask who sanctioned it etc. But it is fact they blew up scuds there is a video of it on this website cant tell you its name but I swear its on. And by the way they were told to find the scuds and paint them for airstrikes not personally destroy them but as I say they did.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
The Scuds were never blown up. They found markers that they believed would lead them to the scuds, but because it was night and the temperature was below freezing they decided to wait until the next day when they were compromised.
They never painted the scuds, they didn't have any communications at all during the mission due to Mcnabb not relizing they had brought faulty equipment
Crizzle789 2 years ago
I assure you some scuds were destroyed by the SAS in desert storm positive 100% no doubt at all. Its sods law I wont find it like type in on Google history of bravo 2 zero and its on the first website I think. But as I say their goal was changed during the mission from making as much havoc in the Iraqi army as possible to locating scuds which I assure you they did destroy scuds during the mission.
Squire19lUK 2 years ago
Dude you can watch the movie as well. By the second day they were busting balls trying to get out of iraq
Crizzle789 2 years ago
you idiot one sas could wipe out 20 ira infact in iraq one sas soldier killed 20 taliban with a knife and you think the ira could kill sas like that bullshit
mastercheff1216 2 years ago
from the evidence seen in Afghanistan, we've lost 200 normal soldiers vs the Taliban loosing about 200,000-ish.
So to them, our basic soldiers are elite, so the SAS must be like a God compared to a Taliban soldier.
Snagprophet 2 years ago 26
Andy Mcnab ( Ex --SAS ) was paid by the CIA to train the Mujahideen during Afghanistans conflict with Russia
Obiviously they've forgotten a few skills
nikon005 2 years ago 4
It doesnt matter how good you are, an SAS caught off guard staring down a 3 year old with an AK-47 is going to die plain and simple, there are no heroes on a battlefield, what could be the best soldier could be dead purly by luck/unluck
saltzr 2 years ago
Thats why the SAS are trained 'not' to rush in. Thats what sets them apart from normal marines :)
sticky1305 2 years ago
yes but they dont go swarming the battlefield with every other tom dick and harry and 3 year olds with ak's you fool
SCOTTISHPATRIOT85 2 years ago
@saltzr You are wrong.
How good you are is the point of the SAS.
No serving member of our forces would be stupid enough to be in the position you have outlined.
orgo1968 1 year ago
@Snagprophet i never hear about the Taliban casualties, where did you hear that ?
samosayoe 2 years ago
@samosayoe
Must have been on the news or something.
Snagprophet 2 years ago
@Snagprophet lol i was thinking the same thing as soon as a Taliban soldier sees a SAS soldier the Taliban soldier will run away or kill himself or just get shot right in the head by the SAS soldier
shoelase17 1 year ago
@Snagprophet all the british are dead in anal action
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@Snagprophet
4 ISLAMIC HEROES HAVE KILLED 200 UK FAGGOTS IN LONDON ATTACK
ISLAMICS ARE GOD COMPARATED TO BRITISH COWARDS
GrandeurFrancaise 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise
What's your problem?
If your going to insult the British do learn to spell. It's 'compared' not 'COMPARATED' .
MCPOCHRIS021 1 year ago
Comment removed
MCPOCHRIS021 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise no they killed 52. inbred muslim cunt. go and pray to allah even though he doesnt exist.
ampthilluk 1 year ago
@GrandeurFrancaise oh look its a yank......shut it ok your specail forces are as good as sh*t, u tried 2 save a british hostage and u used a grenade and killed her !!!
TheBritishRAF 1 year ago
@Snagprophet the taliban are war hardened fighters. but that goes to show you the power of the british and americans
xaaopbbx 1 year ago
@mastercheff1216 where did you hear that story ? sounds interesting
samosayoe 2 years ago
"Who Dares, Wins."
Excellent Motto
IbizaIsBurning 2 years ago 2
islam is the cancer of the world
bigchiefmingingbolok 3 years ago 9
FUCK U PAKI SCUM
BrutalMonkey1 3 years ago 7
what a bizarre character.
halfglassed 3 years ago
and by the way we donn,t need ur fucking second hand aircrafts who can only bomb innocent people. We ll crush ur chocklate cream soldiers with only ak 47 and u ll see in coming years.
THEKRIA 3 years ago
A) who said i was american?. B) i don't agree with any war even though iv'e been to one,have you? C) "we learned your language"?what ENGLISH originates in pakistan now does it?,well done fool. D)your country does buy our aircraft and as of second hand weapons,arent ak47s from russia?you wont be crushing any one with an ak47 thats why you plant ied at roadsides like little girls
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago 2
oh and E) "and by the way we donn,t need ur fucking second hand aircrafts who can only bomb innocent people. We ll crush ur chocklate cream soldiers with only ak 47 and u ll see in recent years" i know thats what you deleted cos how can you see in recent years haha "youll see" is future "recent years" is past dumb fuck,you sure you can load your magazine into the breach of your ak now brain box haha
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
these britans donn,t learn anything from history. They can never win war from brave people of afghanistan if you donn,t believe me you will see in coming years.
AFGHANISTAN PAKISTAN ZINDABAD
death to our enemies
THEKRIA 3 years ago
yeah,why you speaking english and looking at our spec ops?why you lot plague every corner in the uk with a shop?if your country is so comfortable why dont u all stay put?cos its a shit hole thats why,and your second hand aircraft are no match for u.k. and u.s. now are they,not including the "brave people" in tiny teams taking out whole platoons of desert rats
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago 3
These were not us who enter in ur country first.You came in subcontinent before 300 years ago u learned our language. u sick people destroyed our culture.We donnot forget our revenge its in our blood so now we ll fuck ur country like what u sick people r doing in afghanistan now.
U american bitches
THEKRIA 3 years ago
You hate americans but you use an american based website...You hairy pieces of garbage...You are the killers of the innocent. How many women and children are victims of your "revenge" attacks. We don't need to kill ourselves to get laid but you all chase your virgins to allah. Get a clue dude...Not everyone can have a million virgins waiting for them.
awsk8er02 3 years ago
He will find out the only virgin will be his virgin ass when satan is climbing on it after he blows himself up along with innocent people of his own kind.:)
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago 4
islam what a fucked up crazy stupied religion.
lewlew12345 3 years ago 6
Im English and i wont have you say that about our american brothers the uk and usa are fucking pakistan up the arse right now it wont be long before we have just about enough of you and your petty religion and deside to wipe you of the face of the earth for england and its kingsmen and for america
mastercheff1216 2 years ago 2
time will prove it who is gonna win.
THEKRIA 2 years ago
Comment removed
THEKRIA 3 years ago
Vikingodin...I think you just became my favorite person in the ENTIRE world. Thank you for telling that scum bag off the way he should have been. Where/ when did you serve?
awsk8er02 3 years ago
kosovo 1999,c company of the 3rd battalion of the parachute regiment (3 para),and yeah,that guy is seriously deluded.
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago
uh SHUT THE FUCK UP u muslims always crying about something. GOT FUCKING PROBLEMS HERE? THEN GO FUCK OFF HOME!
lewlew12345 3 years ago 10
SAS train in Wales night and day summer rain freezing temps always striving to perfect perfection
cymrucymreig 3 years ago
i'm impressed you found this WW2 footage. The SAS were top secret until the terrorist attack on the Iranian embassy.
Windrunner1 3 years ago
they still are top secret dude.
seamusmcmad 3 years ago
By which i mean that even their existance was denyed.
Windrunner1 3 years ago
only missions not the existence of them,you can apply to join em after 3 years in the forces,although most guys go from parachute regiment and other elite units,the SBS must be fuckin tough they have a 90% failure rate to join
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago
SB only accept applications from The Royal Marine Commando Units... ( M&AWC etc...) All other applicants need not apply. Just thought i'd let you know.
Cheers.
madeinenglandtribute 3 years ago
yeah i was on bout s.a.s,and paras if you read that bit,cheers
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago
Hi mate...
I may be outta date now fella.. It was back in the late unpleasantness for me... (1984 >) They only recruited, as far as I was aware from RM. May have changed now... haha... Everything else has, including my waisteline ffs! haha!
Cheers m8.
tommyplod 3 years ago 2
90% fail rate in all uk sf,not just sbs soz,also to be eligible sbs for selection, a candidate must be male, and must have have served in the military for at least 18 months and have 3 years left to serve.and its first i heard when you said what you said :)
VIKINGODIN 3 years ago
10% failure rate for sas selection hats how tough it is =)
timunknown 2 years ago
10% success rate. 90% Drop out.
wetbivybag 2 years ago 2
no you mean 10% success and 90% failure.
graymic 2 years ago
now i know what SAS stands for i was playing COD4 going wtf? no one teaches us about other countries to much just the name of the towns.
xxSickwithpainxx 3 years ago