bhangi batsman aaj tak kbi india k liye nai khela.. sachin is not a match winnner.. he's soo shit... never ever played well in second inning when india( gay hind) needs him...
This little rat had already deserted the sinking ship, complaining of a toe inflammation! hahahahaha
but Indian cricketers returned today.....leave aside spectators, even the relatives stayed away and the glum chootiyaahs could be seen getting into their cars all alone! hahahahaha
You said a short biography of the 'Master Blaster', but 'Master Blaster' is Viv Richards, Sachin is 'The Little Bunny'. Sorry, I mean 'The Little Master', 'The Little Bunny' is what Jimmy Anderson calls him.
@Hashuism lol. Anderson has dismissed Tendulkar seven times in Test matches. Seven times in 263 balls at an average of 20.7. Three of those are in India before you say anything. Sachin Tendulkar is James Anderson's Test match bunny. Nobody has dismissed Tendulkar more times, including Murali, McGrath, Warne, Lee, Wasim etc I don't hate Sachin at all, he's one of cricket's all time greats, I was just pointing out that he is James Anderson's bunny, which is a fact. edit copy, edit paste.
lol who ever think brian lara is better then tendulkar are full of shit, but hey let me show you the figures to shut all of you up
Tendulkar ODI 18,111 runs 453 games, 100/50 48/95
Brian lara ODI 10,405 runs 299 games, 100/50 19/63
theirs a 7,706 runs difference between tendulkar has played 154 games more then lara so if lara had to catch up in those 154 games he would have to get 50 100's and 54 half centuries do the maths if you dont beleive, for him to catch up it is impossible!
@BlueKiaser 50 ODI centuries....noone else has ever done that....0nly ever 200 in ODI's...99 International Centuries...Over 15,000 runs....Want me to Continue? Just accept it, he is the master.You're just a deluded, ignorant Australian who has too much pride to accept that he is wrong.
ODI's did not exist during Bradman's era, so ODI figures mean NOTHING when comparing. Tests and First Class cricket was all that was available.
Bradman's career spanned about 20 years and Tendulkar's has spanned about 21 years.
Tendulkar has missed more Tests than Bradman did. When not playing Test cricket, Bradman played First Class cricket often against his Australian bowlers.
Bradman's First Class runs: 28067 avg: 95.14 including 117 centuries. Read & Weep!
Aravinda de Silva is better than Sachin. Don't just look at runs/stats, look at quality of batsmanship and the attitude. Aravinda could match Sachin stroke for stroke and Wasim Akram said he was the most dangerous batsman to bowl to. So who really could read swing, seam and different conditions better? Aravinda. Who was able to continue his natural aggressive game and still be a champion for his team? Aravinda. And who was the better big match "when it matters most" player? Aravinda.
we got the world cup even before 1983. a ten years before that. in 1973 when the God was born. Thanks for playing for India. We dont need cups, we are blessed to have you on our side.
we got the world cup even before 1983. a ten years before that. in 1973 when the God was born. Thanks for playing for India. We dont need cups, we are blessed to have you on our side.
i am a pakistani.....but i along with thousands of other pakistani just loves sachin tendulkar......he is uncomparable.......even greater than bradman...!!
@BlueKiaser and man u talking about match winning performance and all that now tell me... what punter has with those great players support with him... his performance is getting down ... from period of 1995 to 1999 his avg is 44 , now after all those great players retirement his from 2007 his avg is just 40 ... what has he done so , 2-0 loss to india 2 time, 2-1 and 3-1 loss to asshes, now out in WC that too in QF lols.. win is far off thing not even reached finals... lols...
@BlueKiaser if other performing well with u that always reflect in ur perfomance thats why punter avg that much if would had played for any avg team than his avg would had been never more then 45 same with bradman he always got well support from others if he would ever had faced any team stronger than his own and had played in todays circumstances he would had avg above 60.... u can see from last 4 yrs sachin avg is 75+, when the team is performing well... and winning...
@36pratham Again, I do not see the statistics and history supporting your belief that batsmen perform better in good teams. Tendulkar's worst batting average calendar years were 2003 - 2006, in which time India had Sehwag, Laxman, Dravid, Ganguly, Kumble.
Ponting's worst form was in 2001 with 77 runs scored in 10 innings. Australia won 4 of those 6 matches. Australia was at full strength with Hayden, Waughs, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath ???
Check these crappy opinions before wasting my time.
@BlueKiaser lols just 10 inngs u call it bad form... form is considered on the basis of season not inngs.. have some brain the reason for ponting that poor performance was not form.. the reason was he cant play spin well he was always harbhajan bunny... didnt even scored 20 runs in whole series... everyone knows how he sucks on indian pitches... just see ponting performance form 1996 to 1999 his avg less than 45, and see his avg from 2008 to 2011 its 40....
@36pratham Once again your opinions are not backed by facts and statistics.
1. 5 of those 10 innings were played against England, so spin & Harbie can not be the soul blame.
2. Ponting was Harbie's bunny up until 2001 only. During 2001, Harbie took most of the Indian wickets, so if Ponting was in poor form, it stands to reason that Harbie would have got him out. After that 2001 tour, Ponting's record against Harbie is good, especially in India.
3. Ponting's performance is form not team related.
@BlueKiaser dude sachin has never played that bad continously for 3 , 4 years... yes in 2003 his avg was just 17 but he played just 5 matches that year...and next year his avg climbed to 92.... and the reason was injury... if u know that he played the full 2003 wc with broken finger but still was the highest run scorer of that WC....
@36pratham So what. I'm not arguing Ponting is better than Tendulkar. I am defending Bradman when idiots like yourself think Tendulkar is better than Bradman, and then use ridiculous excuses for Bradman's domination like Bradman was only successful because he played in a good team. You have NO data to support this pathetic opinion. Ponting's example is poor. There is no correlation between Ponting's form and Australia's form. You are WRONG again. Tendulkar's best years were in a poor India era.
@36pratham You highlight Pontings poorer years of averages of 45 ('96-'99) and 40 ('08-'11). I hope you also realise Tendulkar average < 40 for first 4 years of Test cricket and <45 for 4 years of '05-'08.
But having said that, I think it's irrelevant. I don't believe Bradman, Tendulkar or Ponting's averages are improved by their team's performance. Quite the opposite, when they bat well, the team has more chance of winning.
@BlueKiaser i guess u trying hard but this thing is its better instead of arguing we should stop and enjoy cricket.... for u australians its bradman for we indian its sachin ... to me bradman is great i never say he is lower than sachin but a guy who has never scored against great bowlers never played against team which is stronger than his own team, just hit 6 sixes in his whole carrier can never be best... he belongs to league of lara sachin...
2. Australia lost against teams during Bradman's era, so obviously, Bradman did play against teams stronger than his own on occassion. And this argument is irrelevant unless you believe A Flower > Tendulkar.
3. Bradman was respected for his lack of 6's, because he chose to hit the ball along the ground so he couldn't get caught. Seriously, if lack of sixes is your reason, then your argument is pathetic.
now after gap of almost 1 year.. they played against aus this is the only series bradman played against SA .... after this SA played against aus in 1935 and even without bradman... australia thrashed this minnow..4-0..... and these are the great SA bowlers bradman faced...
@BlueKiaser everyone were playing just there 2nd series.... just 12, 13 odd matches thay had played wow how great bowlers bradman faced lols.... they were even worst than bangladeshi bowleres...
@36pratham I never said Bradman faced great bowlers against South Africa.
My conditions for a GREAT bowler is a bowling average less than 25 runs per wicket and more than 50 Test wickets. Right now, Dale Steyn is the ONLY great test bowler currently playing test cricket.
Bradman faced Verity, Bowes, Bedser ... Great bowlers.
Bangladesh have never had a Great bowler. Bangladesh are minnows.
South Africa were NOT Minnows.
When Tendulkar played Sri Lanka in the 90's, they were MINNOWS!
@BlueKiaser larwood just played 21 matches bowl avg 28 , out 21 just 14 against aus... while bradman played just 7, 8 matches against him.... even zimbabwe heath streak bowling avg is 28....
now no bowler of that era has played 40 or 50 + matches... that u can call tham good and other than bowes and verity no one has bowling avg less than 25..
lol u call thes bowlers who played 14, 20 matches great lols... in todays era in 1st 20 , 30 matches players dont even became permanent member lols
@36pratham Bedser, Bowes, Verity ... Great bowlers. I bet if I could be bothered, I would find that Bradman has played a greater percentage of his Test Career against teams containing at least one great bowler, given a great bowler is avg less than 25 runs and more than 50 wickets.
You admit Bowes was good, no mention of Verity or Bedser. As I have said previously, you are IGNORANT of Bradman's era. I am fluent of both Bradman and Tendulkar's era.
@BlueKiaser i guess enough time wasted u had made great effort u not able to proove ur bradman great and all these shows how much he was over hyped , the thing is its better not to compare 2 legends of diffrent its offcourse an insult a legend to say anyone lower.... batter take its bradman for u its sachin for us.. be happy and let us live happily...
@36pratham I struggle to think of one thing you have argued in Tendulkar's defence or attack of Bradman which I have not shown to be utter rubbish. You are delusional if you think Bradman is over hyped, when he is widely respected by the vast majority of the cricketing world to be the Greatest ever batsmen. Only somebody ignorant of cricket history and Bradman's era would think Tendulkar is better.
On many, many situations I have proven your ignorance of Bradman's era.
@BlueKiaser and 1 thing i wan ask i always used lara and sachin both but u always talked about sachin why not lara this shows u just jealous of sachin and his achivements i gues sachin is the only man who has always stood when it comes to playing against australia and challnged that team.......
@36pratham Lara supporters generally accept Bradman was better. You entered in to this debate where I have defended Bradman against "Tendulkar is greater than Bradman" posts.
Tendulkar supporters are the only ones delusional and fanatical enough to not be able to accept that Tendulkar may not be the best ever batsmen. You are a great example of these type of Tendulkar Brain sufferers.
@36pratham WRONG! AGAIN! Tendulkar's average for last 4 yrs is about 63. Tendulkar has averaged 75+ during the last 2 years. ... because batting has never been easier.
Tendulkar's average for last 10 matches = 82.35. Kallis's = 100.53, Sangakkara = 78.21, Samaraweera = 77.60
Select batsmen scoring > 1000 Test runs in a calendar year and average > 70 runs. You get 29 records. 12 unique players from 2000 on and only 11 prior to 2000.
Sobers, Bradman & Ponting the only 3 to avg > 100.
@lltrinida ya lara is among the best batsmen and in same league of sachin and kallis ,his 375 and 400 make him the great but not the best.. 1st of all sachin is far ahead of lara in odis.. in test matches sachin has the avg of 56 or 57 and it has never dropped below 55 while lara has avg of 52, and if u leave lara avg in SL he always have low avg playing outside WI like 33 in india, 36 in NZ , 41 in aus , sachin has avg of 59 against aus, infact sachin has avg of 50+ against all the nations...
@lltrinida except pak (40 avg ) and SA against which both lara and sachin have same 46.. and another thing is if u see its really difficult to mainatin same after 130 tests punter and dravid are examples till 130 tests sachin and dravid had same avg even some use to say dravid is better in tests but , now u can see the diffrence clearly...may be lara realised that and quit at the right time...
A good batsman is defined by his ability to handle pressure, and Sachin is one such batsman who crumbles under pressure. However, he will play for his personal records to create a benchmark for others to chase his records down, albeit with great difficulty. But does that make him the best of the best? Absolutely not! Simply because cricket is a game where you have to be a good team player, and here is where Ponting steals the show as a master batsman, champion and captain of Australian team!!
@IronManu77ponting avg.in tests after the retirement of mcgrath and warne is only41.His avg in both forms of the game has dropped to a great extent.In the previous years he enjoys his batting with no pressure what so ever as their are no. of match winner present in the team.Ponting is one of the biggest asshole cricket has ever seen with no ethics or sportsmanship.(Latest eg his spat with umpire aleem dar).
@nj12qwaszx You are an asshole, and let me name a few more assholes in Indian cricket team: Sreesanth who loves to cry on the field in front of an audience, also gestures at batsmen with provocative symbols; Harbhajan Singh - need not say much about him; Gautam Gambhir - who likes to bump into bowlers shoulders and then cuss at them; the writing is on the wall for your Indian team, I am Indian origin by the way, and find Indians to be the biggest backstabbers in the world, so fuck off India!!!
@IronManu77 son of a bitch,bastard,.retarded racists on what basis you can call indians as backstabbers.Does an indian raped your mother and then refused to own you as your child.Is that the reason asshole?
@IronManu77 ha ha lols that punter till 2007 i rate him as the one of the best batsmen in league of sachin and lara but now he is now just good like those of ganguly... he always played with the great infact best team in the world look at his avg after retirement of great players in 2007 his avg 38 , in 2008 47 , 2009 36 , 2010 38 he is just an avg player now when the situation really demanded from him, while sachin was the lone warrior during 90s for india... punter is a looser..
@36pratham lolz to you too, that Sachin, lolz, he plays only for records, and it is funny how he gets out he believes that there is an agenda against him, lolz again. Also, 0 world cup victories for Sachin, I am not sure what you mean by lone warrior. The only innings i remember him playing well was Sharjah back in late 90s, but Punter has always raised his game on the big tournaments,...e.g. 2003 World Cup final where he hammered 140* against India. Ponting is the best, Sachin a loser!! :)
Om Shri Ganeshay Namaha. If you are going throgh troubles, chant sankata nashan Ganesha stotra 3 times a day. The power of lord Ganesha will wipe away your sorrows.
@36pratham Everywhere? Oh except for the stats, the bowler friendly pitches back then and the lackluster competition Sachin competes against. It's harder to be a hero these days because the top teams are evenly matched, that's why I can appreciate a standout like Sachin. But you can't compare him with Don. Don was twice as good in terms of stats. 3 times as good in terms of centuries made and twice the hero in a nation that was floundering in depression as opposed to a fledgling economic monster
@Pigroota wt stats below i prooved many things about stats but u cant understand anything lols... and u mean to say sachin didnt played in tough conditions..thats funny did bradman played on tough conditions he just played in 2 countries aus and eng... he never played great spinners great asian turning tracks i hope u know punters avg in india its in 20s lols... and why u say of these days y u forgot period of 1990s when sachin was the lone warrior for india..
aussies won't give up,wouldn't they........ highest score in odis ever on this planet-sachin more than 14000 test runs 30000 first class runs 17550 odi runs 50 centuries in tests 46 in odis overall more than 30000 international runs overall 96 international centuries 60 man of matches in odi's and 13 in test 14 man of series in odi's and 4 in tests Tendulkar has scored over 1000 runs in a calendar year in ODIs 7 times, and in 1998 he scored 1894 runs next time hold your tongue auss
friends Donald Bradman is best ever batsman we know that but at that time cricket matches are only between australia and west indies and all runs of bradman are scored against west indies only but sachin scored runs against all the world teams that the fact
@goruitft you are incorrect. bradman played against england , sth africa , new zealand ect. who do you think the bodyline series was against? im sorry but do some research!
@goruitft Tendulkar against the world - especially against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh! Look it up. He's played more against these 2 worst teams than anyone else. Besides, Don scored most of his runs against England, not Windies! England was the best team in the world at the time, not to mention the fact that pitches were more conducive to bowling, not batting. There was no heavy roller, lots of grass. Batsmen have luxuries these days. Oh and did I mention Bodyline? Don is god compared to Sachin.
@goruitft Wanna compare stats? If Don played the same number of tests as Sachin he would have 150 centuries to his name. How many does Sachin have? 50? hahaha, Sachin is nothing compared to Don. Oh, and averages? Don is 40, yes FORTY ahead of the next best player. Sachin is another 10 behind that. Puts things in perspective no? I like Sachin, he is good for the game, but you parochial Don critics don't know what you are talking about, so just shut up and don't even bother comparing them
@Pigroota dude its not sachin its don who played against minnows through out his carrier... 1st of all zimbabwe was not a minnow other then aus they were tough for all teams specially at there home just like NZ they are worst now thats why india had not played against them from long time.. he has just played 7 matches against Bang, about bradman ind , SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh , they were just like ireland or nambia of today..
You either have a poor memory, or forget the lies you tell.
Read your comment @Pigroota (1 month ago). Use Find "he has just played 7 matches against Bang, about bradman ind , SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh"
Your excuses for Bradman's dominance are pathetic. SA beat England in previous 2 serious during the time you declare them as minnows. W R O N G !!!
@BlueK dude i will again say the same thing india and WI were new to international who debuted even after bradman debut... and SA was minnow who did not play much during bradman period as u know there was gap 1914-20 after that play ver less cricket infact in between years they use to skip also... they were just like bangladesh of todays period... even bangladesh has also beaten west indies 2-0, and they are regularly beating teams in odis also...
@36pratham Don't be stupid. Prior to Bradman's Test career, South Africa had played 58 Tests and won 11 of those. During Bradman's Test career of 52 matches, South Africa played 37 international test matches.
Bradman played against SA in '31/32. SA's series prior to this they won against England and they also won their next series after Bradman's against NZ.
Comparing SA vs Bangladesh is just as pathetic as Bradman vs Tendulkar.
@BlueKiaser lols i didnt asked u about few bad inngs its about 2 , 3 years after the retirement of all these players ponting never reached 50 again.... lols u talking about sachin 1st 4 years... lols u talking about 16 , 17 yrs old kid how many get chance even to play in test cricket at this age... but still his avg was 41 in 1990 and 1992.... and 1993 it was 91..... ponting debuted at age of 21 , even ur great bradman debuted at age of 20...
@BlueKiaser u talk about sachin worst years were from 2003 to 2007 but sachin avg in 2004 was 91and 2007 55.... so u cant say its worst... if same would had happened to ponting i woudnt had said the same..like in 1 year his avg was just in 30s if it would had climbed to 50 or 60 + atleast , but 3 times avg in 30s and not even once touched 50....
@BlueKiaser ohk u told me to accept andy flower greater than sachin i would have surely accepted if his avg would be better than sachin in odis and if he his avg vs aus would be atleast 50+ not 14.... andy flower avg against.. england just 33 .. his avg against sri lanka... is just 38... while sachin avg is not less than 40 against any country....
@36pratham My reference to Andy Flower was in relation to your argument about how hard it is for batsmen to score in weak teams. If your theory is correct, then Andy Flower is a better batsmen than Tendulkar. You can't have it both ways. If you are going to defend Tendulkar and say his average would be better if he played in a better team, then surely Andy Flower's would be far far better than Tendulkar's. Your argument, not mine.
@BlueKiaser sachin best came in india poor era....
ohk... sachin best came 1997 to 2002... well u comparing a 24- 30 year person who is 8, 9 years experianced in cricket... and this is the period when any criciketer reaches his peak according to all greats and experts... u comparing it to a 37-38 year old cricketer who is playing from last 21 years..
@36pratham One minute you tell me that Ponting only performed well when Australia was a strong team, next minute you defend Tendulkar and say Tendulkar performed well due to his age and experience. Well sunshine, using your argument, Ponting's peak form between '02-'06 was due to his age and experience and nothing to do with the team he played in.
You just continue to make up pathetic excuses for Tendulkar that have absolutely no statistical evidence or correlation. Admit it, Bradman is best.
@BlueKiaser quite simply, sachin is the best batsmen in the history of the game. Bradman played during the World War 2 Period. seriously? the game has changed almost completely since then. the type of bowlers that sachin has faced and the type of games sachin has been involved in is totally different to what Bradman faced. c'mon mate, just face it. Sachin has been playing right throughout the greatest era of cricket and has dominated parts of it. Bradman trained with cavemen for goodness sake.
@Moeine93 Tell me these "dominated parts" of cricket by Tendulkar? Tendulkar has been rated the ICC Best Test Batsmen for < 13% of his batting career. Is that what you mean by "dominated parts". He "dominated" Test cricket for <13% of his career. That's a pretty poor statistic for the "best batsmen in the history of the game".
As usual, just another Bradman Denier suffering Tendulkar Brain.
@BlueKiaser sometimes statistics don't tell the whole story. Yes, Bradman may have an average of 99 or whatever it is. he played in an era where the ODI game wasn't even invented nor was the T20 format. and my goodness the type of bowlers back then were not good enough to clean the shoes of bowlers in this 90's and 00's generation. Tendulkar is the best batsmen of all time, this is from a neutral point of view. As a Pakistan fan, it's not easy to admit it. but dude he really is the greatest ever
@BlueKiaser you aussies just do not give up lol. fact: the bowlers Bradman faced were nothing compared to even average bowlers of Tendulkars era, nevermind the best bowlers. the only thing Bradman has to hold with his name is his average. nothing else. when will you realise that Cricket advanced and has changed almost totally since when he played. if you love statistics so much, Bradman played 20 years of cricket and couldn't gain half of what Tendulkar gained. in a terrible era of cricket.
@Moeine93 I can tell you know virtually nothing about Bradman and his era. This is why you generalise with opinions like only Bradman's average and poor bowlers of Bradman's era.
In Bradman's 20 years of cricket, he missed 8 international Test Matches. Tendulkar has missed 14. Bradman has scored more first class runs than Tendulkar.
Bradman dominated his era like no other batsmen in cricket history. Tendulkar has not dominated his era. Tendulkar is one of many with a 50+ test avg ATM.
@BlueKiaser How has Tendulkar NOT dominated? The only 200 in an ODI, Ranked best ODI and Test Batsman, 50 centuries....you saying that he knows nothing about Bradman, well you obviously know nothing about the little master. And what you said about Dale Steyn being the only good bowler is bullshit. Cricket has come on so much since Bradmans day.
@CiTyOfGoD96 Dale Steyn is currently the only great test bowler playing. My definition of a great bowler is one who has taken at least 50 wickets and has a bowling average < 25runs per wicket. Go to cricinfo and look at best bowling averages and you'll find this (except they use min 2000 deliveries instead of my 50 wickets criteria). They list 72 bowlers. Dale Steyn the only current one on the list.
Please quantify your ranked best ODI and Test batsmen. Not according to ICC.
@CiTyOfGoD96 Tendulkar supporters have stated that Tendulkar has dominated and I have questioned this and asked for evidence and examples. Bradman dominated. If Bradman's the benchmark, then Tendulkar has NOT dominated. My comments are comparative to Bradman, given that's my argument. It is Tendulkar supporters stating Tendulkar is the greatest ever and better than Bradman. So do you honesty believe that Tendulkar has dominated more than Bradman. Of course he hasn't. Unless you're delusional.
@36pratham Really? Haha, he obviously cannot face the truth. It is funny how all Australians think Bradman is the best, but the rest of the world can accept that Tendulkar is the true master...
@BlueKiaser i didnt continue debate with u because u are psycho who dont have any other work just surfing where can bash sachin nothing else......
other than variety there no other good bowler he faced veirty was ohk good but not at all great.... his avg became less than 25 just becuase of his avg against minnows india....
@BlueKiaser only left is bedser he was good but it debuted in 1946 so he played very less match against bradman...... so in all he just played against only 1 good bowler verity thats it.... lols....
@BlueKiaser Australia and South Africa had both had about 10 months since their last series.
That's the way it was with international test cricket in that era. They did not have jets
what ever the reason is the thing is aus and england were regular into cricket while SA use to play very less sometimes gap of more than 1 year sometimes gap of 2 years and sometimes even 3.......
yeh his avg is slightly better thanks to his team who supported him very well and great bowlers because of which he has so many nout outs and he has great avg.....
@BlueKiaser and u talk about match winning.... of kallis... tell me why he has just 1 match winning knock against australia.... and that too in 2009 when now australia is most weak team compare to there previous 20 years team......
see this kack kallis is SA 4th or 5th bowler and his avg is 32.... while indian main strike bowler bowling avg zaheer khan is 31.94.... lols i hope ur brain will get something now.....
its bowlers that win test matches now batsman dumbo....
thats why in 1 match brian lara scored 351 and still WI lost.....
see this jack kallis is SA 4th or 5th bowler and his avg is 32.... while indian main strike bowler bowling avg zaheer khan is 31.94.... lols i hope ur brain will get something now.....
its bowlers that win test matches now batsman dumbo....
thats why in 1 match brian lara scored 351 and still WI lost.....
if he would had get the kind of team india is now or if he would had get the kind of team ponting or bradman got his avg would be atleast 10 + to his current avg.....
@36pratham I don't believe that, but even if Tendulkar's average was at least 10+ better than his current average, it would still be over 30runs less than Bradman's.
Bradman is the Greatest batsmen ever and you continue to show your delusional ignorance and lack of respect to cricket's history.
and about SA of bradman period... yeh offcourse they were minnow of that period just like bangladesh... even bangladesh.. has beaten west indies zimbabwe...
and dont talk about how much SA played during bradman era and all that just say how much SA played when bradman 1st time played against SA because bradman just played in 1 series against SA in 1931.....
cricket again started in 1920 , while SA played after gap of 2 years in end of 1921
than gap of more than 1 year... in 1924 in june...
than after a gap of more than 3 years in 1927 dec... lols who wont call tham minnow.... now...
than against gap of almost 2 years in 1929....
than against after gap of almost 2 years in 1930 dec... and finally then won 1 match lols... i am sure if bangladesh plays like that against 1 team continously they will surely won atleast 1 match... but dont forget thay had beaten wi and zim
@BlueK only murli lols.. what u talking about man what about akram , ambrose, walsh, mcdormot, mcgrath, warne, pollock, donald etc.... lols... u can say anyting just to proove ur bradman greats lols.... what a fanatic u are....
dude even gough, caddick,lee, akhtar, anderson vetori are better bowlers than those club lever bowlers that bradman faced.... u can rate him best but not me who never played any team stronger than his own team.. and who hit just 6 sixes in his whole carrier..
@36pratham You don't even know what bowlers Bradman faced. If you had read some history or made any effort to look at Bradman's records and playing era you would be naming those bowlers.
It is much easier to live in denial.
You chose not to read and learn about Bradman's era because you would have to face up to the reality of Bradman being a greater batsman than your pin-up boy.
Using Bradman's 6 sixes ... your arguments are seriously getting shamefully pathetic now.
@BlueKiaser and if zim is minnow to u then eng is also minnow of bradman period, yes now zim is minnow but from last 8 or 10 yes india had not played against zim and suring 2000 yeh zim was weak but not minnow thats why india use to loose series to zimbabwe... head to head just like australia i quite strong to eng simmilarly india was strong to zim but still they were not minnow....
@BlueKiaser just like don has 150+ against minnows like SA"
& "only against 1 established team eng against whome his avg is 61"
lols when did i said that i think ur eyes are weak go to a doctor...
bradman avg against england is 82 and it was only establish team of that period as weak to aus so offcourse not a a strong team.... so no one can say did bradman ever scored against any good strong team....
@Pigroota can u give such teams even test status offcourse not with such teams bradman made his avg that much high... eng and aus were only establshed teams that time among 2 eng were already at 2nd lols.. how can that team be strong or even if it was strong lets say then bradman just scored only against 1 strong team... lols.. then how can that batsmen be all time great... he throughtout his life played mostly in eng and aus never in played turning asian wickets , never played odis...
@Pigroota now use ur brain and think urself without being bias erase strong teams like aus,pak, SA,sl and think if sachin had played against teams like bangladesh ,nambia, ireland mind u he has avg of 136 against bang just like don has 150+ against minnows like SA ,ind offcourse more then 150 and only against 1 established team eng against whome his avg is 61 but playing with all advantages like without any pressure , no hectic schdule, less cricket (no odis).....
@goruitft It's bad enough for one Tendulkar Brain fanatic to make a false statement, but to then have 2 more give him a thumbs up just highlights how uneducated these Tendulkar supporters are.
Don Bradman scored over 28,000 first class runs at an average of 95. Almost 7,000 of those were international test runs against England, South Africa, India & West Indies. 447 of those runs were against West Indies.
Learn your history before embarrassing yourselves.
1 reason why India gets very few golds in the Olympics is bcoz Indians concentrate too much in cricket. I don't think its even in the Olympics & when you compare with China, which isn't much more developed, it just makes you think is there any use of India being too good in cricket. After all its just 1 game. Debate on this.
To achieve so much and be so humble, and always bringing out the kid in himself, it's amazing. If there's one sports star that young kids should look up to, it's him. Ponting, Tiger Woods, David Beckham? No Sachin Tendulkar is perfection.
ponting has played 100 matches less in odis than sachin and scored 4k runs less.He will surely hit those 4k in 100 matches.he has scored at the same rate as sachin.
sachin in 171 tests hits 14k runs and ponting in 145 tests hits 12 k runs
so whats so much of a diff between em i dont understand,moreover ponting won 3 world cups,captains the team and is a regular member of the aussie team which kicks out players if they dont perform.Ponting debut 95,sachin debut 89...
sachin fucking
chicolindo12345678 2 months ago
sachin bitch f
chicolindo12345678 2 months ago
sachine is not a pig but some r calling him as pig they are dog sons and mother fucker
anaghsasi 3 months ago
SACHIN PIG
chicagodesiz 3 months ago
@chicagodesiz arey paki lanjodaka
akhilsb143 2 months ago
bhangi batsman aaj tak kbi india k liye nai khela.. sachin is not a match winnner.. he's soo shit... never ever played well in second inning when india( gay hind) needs him...
ukpaulian09 3 months ago
MOST FKN OVERRATED PLAYER SRSLY IJAZ BUTT N MOHAMMED HAFEEZN R 1000 TIMES BETTER... N IM INDIAN BTW
lmaorut 4 months ago
Comment removed
wickedrupak 3 months ago
@lmaorut ....bhosde mein jaaa....suar saala
Ijaz butt...naam se hi gaandu lagta hain...SACHIN k saath compare na kariyo
wickedrupak 3 months ago
@wickedrupak shakib shakib
lmaorut 3 months ago
This little rat had already deserted the sinking ship, complaining of a toe inflammation! hahahahaha
but Indian cricketers returned today.....leave aside spectators, even the relatives stayed away and the glum chootiyaahs could be seen getting into their cars all alone! hahahahaha
141cbc 4 months ago
You said a short biography of the 'Master Blaster', but 'Master Blaster' is Viv Richards, Sachin is 'The Little Bunny'. Sorry, I mean 'The Little Master', 'The Little Bunny' is what Jimmy Anderson calls him.
frobishero 5 months ago
@frobishero
wow same fag gonig around sachin's video and spamming! lol get a life idoit!
Hashuism 5 months ago
@Hashuism lol. Anderson has dismissed Tendulkar seven times in Test matches. Seven times in 263 balls at an average of 20.7. Three of those are in India before you say anything. Sachin Tendulkar is James Anderson's Test match bunny. Nobody has dismissed Tendulkar more times, including Murali, McGrath, Warne, Lee, Wasim etc I don't hate Sachin at all, he's one of cricket's all time greats, I was just pointing out that he is James Anderson's bunny, which is a fact. edit copy, edit paste.
frobishero 5 months ago
@frobishero Actually murali got sachin 8 times
akamathin 5 months ago
@Hashuism lol, you call me a fag, but you would get down on your knees and suck your little master's cock if he asked you to.
frobishero 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sachin tendulkar is my hero
TheSalman5555 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i m pakistani and i love sachin....his way of going to pavilian before umpire says something .the most pious cricketer in history of cricket
TheSarmadkhan 7 months ago
to rub the salt in the wounds runs averages
Tendulkar TEST 56.95 ODI 45.16
Brian LaraTEST 52.88 ODI 40.88
its actually harder to get a higher average the more games you play so hes alot better then lara!
dutchtouch123 7 months ago
lol who ever think brian lara is better then tendulkar are full of shit, but hey let me show you the figures to shut all of you up
Tendulkar ODI 18,111 runs 453 games, 100/50 48/95
Brian lara ODI 10,405 runs 299 games, 100/50 19/63
theirs a 7,706 runs difference between tendulkar has played 154 games more then lara so if lara had to catch up in those 154 games he would have to get 50 100's and 54 half centuries do the maths if you dont beleive, for him to catch up it is impossible!
dutchtouch123 7 months ago
Best man lara
Sajilbabu666 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
search kapilkiduniya on google and then follow the first link.......there u will find all info about this topic.....that was really useful
multicool007 8 months ago
you can say what you want. This man makes me cry everytime he plays for India
kingkongbundy1122 9 months ago
Sachin Tendulkar
chicolindo12345678 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser 50 ODI centuries....noone else has ever done that....0nly ever 200 in ODI's...99 International Centuries...Over 15,000 runs....Want me to Continue? Just accept it, he is the master.You're just a deluded, ignorant Australian who has too much pride to accept that he is wrong.
CiTyOfGoD96 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 Please do continue.
ODI's did not exist during Bradman's era, so ODI figures mean NOTHING when comparing. Tests and First Class cricket was all that was available.
Bradman's career spanned about 20 years and Tendulkar's has spanned about 21 years.
Tendulkar has missed more Tests than Bradman did. When not playing Test cricket, Bradman played First Class cricket often against his Australian bowlers.
Bradman's First Class runs: 28067 avg: 95.14 including 117 centuries. Read & Weep!
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
I am pakistani and i have to say sachin tendulkar is a legend
hadif786 9 months ago
Aravinda de Silva is better than Sachin. Don't just look at runs/stats, look at quality of batsmanship and the attitude. Aravinda could match Sachin stroke for stroke and Wasim Akram said he was the most dangerous batsman to bowl to. So who really could read swing, seam and different conditions better? Aravinda. Who was able to continue his natural aggressive game and still be a champion for his team? Aravinda. And who was the better big match "when it matters most" player? Aravinda.
cauldron555 9 months ago
Respect for Tendulkar from Pakistan.. the only gentleman
adnan2911 9 months ago
it looks as if the video is running at double the speed, but its God bat which is Blowing..
flyinganuj 9 months ago
CONGRATULATIONS GOD(SACHIN) FOR THE WORLD CUP!
Ronsuri 10 months ago
bhenchot @36pratham sachin is great n he is god
go fuck offff
ASHU210690 10 months ago
Tendulkar, Playing On 99.
India Needs 4 Runs Fr0m 1 Ball.
Akhtar B0wls To Tendulkar.
.
.
.
.
.Tendulkar Takes A Single N Completes His Century (:
joinbuddy22 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we got the world cup even before 1983. a ten years before that. in 1973 when the God was born. Thanks for playing for India. We dont need cups, we are blessed to have you on our side.
raghaa 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we got the world cup even before 1983. a ten years before that. in 1973 when the God was born. Thanks for playing for India. We dont need cups, we are blessed to have you on our side.
raghaa 10 months ago
@dhirajp16 "Sachin Tendulkar...greatest batsmen of all time!"
WRONG! Sir Donald Bradman is the greatest batsman.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
Sachin Tendulkar!
you're the greatest, the world has ever seen!
Ogerscherge 10 months ago
@Ogerscherge "Sachin TEndulkar! you're the greatest, the world has ever seen!"
WRONG! Bradman is.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
Sachin Tendulkar Facebook page facebook SachTendulkar
by true Fans of Sachin.
MrSuganindia 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my channel for 2011 cricket world cup swearing!!
ukemcee1 11 months ago
sexy
izazhsp 11 months ago
Sachin Tendulkar the best batsman of this sport... elegance, consistency he has it all..... A TRUE LEGEND!!!
and yes im a pakistani fan of sachin!!!
tahateekhan 11 months ago
i am a pakistani.....but i along with thousands of other pakistani just loves sachin tendulkar......he is uncomparable.......even greater than bradman...!!
silent007ish 11 months ago 2
@silent007ish "even greater than bradman"
WRONG!
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@BlueKiaser and man u talking about match winning performance and all that now tell me... what punter has with those great players support with him... his performance is getting down ... from period of 1995 to 1999 his avg is 44 , now after all those great players retirement his from 2007 his avg is just 40 ... what has he done so , 2-0 loss to india 2 time, 2-1 and 3-1 loss to asshes, now out in WC that too in QF lols.. win is far off thing not even reached finals... lols...
36pratham 10 months ago
@BlueKiaser if other performing well with u that always reflect in ur perfomance thats why punter avg that much if would had played for any avg team than his avg would had been never more then 45 same with bradman he always got well support from others if he would ever had faced any team stronger than his own and had played in todays circumstances he would had avg above 60.... u can see from last 4 yrs sachin avg is 75+, when the team is performing well... and winning...
36pratham 10 months ago
@36pratham Again, I do not see the statistics and history supporting your belief that batsmen perform better in good teams. Tendulkar's worst batting average calendar years were 2003 - 2006, in which time India had Sehwag, Laxman, Dravid, Ganguly, Kumble.
Ponting's worst form was in 2001 with 77 runs scored in 10 innings. Australia won 4 of those 6 matches. Australia was at full strength with Hayden, Waughs, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath ???
Check these crappy opinions before wasting my time.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@BlueKiaser lols just 10 inngs u call it bad form... form is considered on the basis of season not inngs.. have some brain the reason for ponting that poor performance was not form.. the reason was he cant play spin well he was always harbhajan bunny... didnt even scored 20 runs in whole series... everyone knows how he sucks on indian pitches... just see ponting performance form 1996 to 1999 his avg less than 45, and see his avg from 2008 to 2011 its 40....
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Once again your opinions are not backed by facts and statistics.
1. 5 of those 10 innings were played against England, so spin & Harbie can not be the soul blame.
2. Ponting was Harbie's bunny up until 2001 only. During 2001, Harbie took most of the Indian wickets, so if Ponting was in poor form, it stands to reason that Harbie would have got him out. After that 2001 tour, Ponting's record against Harbie is good, especially in India.
3. Ponting's performance is form not team related.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser dude sachin has never played that bad continously for 3 , 4 years... yes in 2003 his avg was just 17 but he played just 5 matches that year...and next year his avg climbed to 92.... and the reason was injury... if u know that he played the full 2003 wc with broken finger but still was the highest run scorer of that WC....
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham So what. I'm not arguing Ponting is better than Tendulkar. I am defending Bradman when idiots like yourself think Tendulkar is better than Bradman, and then use ridiculous excuses for Bradman's domination like Bradman was only successful because he played in a good team. You have NO data to support this pathetic opinion. Ponting's example is poor. There is no correlation between Ponting's form and Australia's form. You are WRONG again. Tendulkar's best years were in a poor India era.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@36pratham You highlight Pontings poorer years of averages of 45 ('96-'99) and 40 ('08-'11). I hope you also realise Tendulkar average < 40 for first 4 years of Test cricket and <45 for 4 years of '05-'08.
But having said that, I think it's irrelevant. I don't believe Bradman, Tendulkar or Ponting's averages are improved by their team's performance. Quite the opposite, when they bat well, the team has more chance of winning.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser Tendulkar's average for last 4 yrs is about 63.
lols dude u are wrong not me....in season 2008/9 his avg is 59, 09/10 its 84,season 2010 78, 2010/11 77.72...
its clearly above 70 in these 4 years.......
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham WRONG AGAIN IDIOT!!!
Straight from ESPNcricinfo for Tendulkar for Test period of last 4 years;
filtered 2007-2011 43 4102 214 63.10
That is, average 63.10.
I have just about had enough debating your pathetic opinions that I continually prove to be WRONG!!!
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
go and see check at cricinfo...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser i guess u trying hard but this thing is its better instead of arguing we should stop and enjoy cricket.... for u australians its bradman for we indian its sachin ... to me bradman is great i never say he is lower than sachin but a guy who has never scored against great bowlers never played against team which is stronger than his own team, just hit 6 sixes in his whole carrier can never be best... he belongs to league of lara sachin...
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham WRONG AGAIN!
1. Bradman did score against great bowlers.
2. Australia lost against teams during Bradman's era, so obviously, Bradman did play against teams stronger than his own on occassion. And this argument is irrelevant unless you believe A Flower > Tendulkar.
3. Bradman was respected for his lack of 6's, because he chose to hit the ball along the ground so he couldn't get caught. Seriously, if lack of sixes is your reason, then your argument is pathetic.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
now after gap of almost 1 year.. they played against aus this is the only series bradman played against SA .... after this SA played against aus in 1935 and even without bradman... australia thrashed this minnow..4-0..... and these are the great SA bowlers bradman faced...
bell just 16 matches lols... bowl avg 32...
morkel 16 matches bowling avg 45..
quinn just 12 matches 32 avg...
vincent 25 matches bowl avg 32...
mcmillan 13 matches... avg 34
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Why do I bother?
Australia and South Africa had both had about 10 months since their last series.
That's the way it was with international test cricket in that era. They did not have jets to fly them from one country to another.
Australia won 4-0 because they were the champs. Aust beat Eng 5-0 in '06-07, doesn't mean England were minnows. You IDIOT!
Current bowling averages for India's strike bowlers;
Khan 31.94
Sreesanth 35.16
Sharma 35.97
Harbhajan 31.85
YOU TWAT!
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlueKiaser
geaorge geary just 15 matches bowl avg 29...
hammond 85 matches.. bowl avg 37 , 83 wickets...
tate 39 matches bowl avg 26 , just 20 matches against aus...
farnes 15 matches bowl avg 28..
bowes now he is the good one 22 avg but just 15 matches and just 6 against australia...
tildeysley 7 matches bowl avg 32...
u ausies talk about larwod everytime he was the best , just because of his speed lols...there are many speedsters in this era..
36pratham 2 weeks ago
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser now just tell me where did i lie....i provided rt. stats...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser everyone were playing just there 2nd series.... just 12, 13 odd matches thay had played wow how great bowlers bradman faced lols.... they were even worst than bangladeshi bowleres...
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham I never said Bradman faced great bowlers against South Africa.
My conditions for a GREAT bowler is a bowling average less than 25 runs per wicket and more than 50 Test wickets. Right now, Dale Steyn is the ONLY great test bowler currently playing test cricket.
Bradman faced Verity, Bowes, Bedser ... Great bowlers.
Bangladesh have never had a Great bowler. Bangladesh are minnows.
South Africa were NOT Minnows.
When Tendulkar played Sri Lanka in the 90's, they were MINNOWS!
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser and what eng bowlers u talking about....
geaorge geary just 15 matches bowl avg 29...
hammond 85 matches.. bowl avg 37 , 83 wickets...
tate 39 matches bowl avg 26 , just 20 matches against aus...
farnes 15 matches bowl avg 28..
bowes now he is the good one 22 avg but just 15 matches and just 6 against australia...
tildeysley 7 matches bowl avg 32...
u ausies talk about larwod everytime he was the best , just because of his speed lols...there are many speedsters in this era..
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser larwood just played 21 matches bowl avg 28 , out 21 just 14 against aus... while bradman played just 7, 8 matches against him.... even zimbabwe heath streak bowling avg is 28....
now no bowler of that era has played 40 or 50 + matches... that u can call tham good and other than bowes and verity no one has bowling avg less than 25..
lol u call thes bowlers who played 14, 20 matches great lols... in todays era in 1st 20 , 30 matches players dont even became permanent member lols
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Bedser, Bowes, Verity ... Great bowlers. I bet if I could be bothered, I would find that Bradman has played a greater percentage of his Test Career against teams containing at least one great bowler, given a great bowler is avg less than 25 runs and more than 50 wickets.
You admit Bowes was good, no mention of Verity or Bedser. As I have said previously, you are IGNORANT of Bradman's era. I am fluent of both Bradman and Tendulkar's era.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser i guess enough time wasted u had made great effort u not able to proove ur bradman great and all these shows how much he was over hyped , the thing is its better not to compare 2 legends of diffrent its offcourse an insult a legend to say anyone lower.... batter take its bradman for u its sachin for us.. be happy and let us live happily...
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham I struggle to think of one thing you have argued in Tendulkar's defence or attack of Bradman which I have not shown to be utter rubbish. You are delusional if you think Bradman is over hyped, when he is widely respected by the vast majority of the cricketing world to be the Greatest ever batsmen. Only somebody ignorant of cricket history and Bradman's era would think Tendulkar is better.
On many, many situations I have proven your ignorance of Bradman's era.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser and 1 thing i wan ask i always used lara and sachin both but u always talked about sachin why not lara this shows u just jealous of sachin and his achivements i gues sachin is the only man who has always stood when it comes to playing against australia and challnged that team.......
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Lara supporters generally accept Bradman was better. You entered in to this debate where I have defended Bradman against "Tendulkar is greater than Bradman" posts.
Tendulkar supporters are the only ones delusional and fanatical enough to not be able to accept that Tendulkar may not be the best ever batsmen. You are a great example of these type of Tendulkar Brain sufferers.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@36pratham WRONG! AGAIN! Tendulkar's average for last 4 yrs is about 63. Tendulkar has averaged 75+ during the last 2 years. ... because batting has never been easier.
Tendulkar's average for last 10 matches = 82.35. Kallis's = 100.53, Sangakkara = 78.21, Samaraweera = 77.60
Select batsmen scoring > 1000 Test runs in a calendar year and average > 70 runs. You get 29 records. 12 unique players from 2000 on and only 11 prior to 2000.
Sobers, Bradman & Ponting the only 3 to avg > 100.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
Brian Lara is the greatest ever....ok maybe don bradman....but sachin tendulkar?!!!!? never.
lltrinidaddy 11 months ago
@lltrinida ya lara is among the best batsmen and in same league of sachin and kallis ,his 375 and 400 make him the great but not the best.. 1st of all sachin is far ahead of lara in odis.. in test matches sachin has the avg of 56 or 57 and it has never dropped below 55 while lara has avg of 52, and if u leave lara avg in SL he always have low avg playing outside WI like 33 in india, 36 in NZ , 41 in aus , sachin has avg of 59 against aus, infact sachin has avg of 50+ against all the nations...
36pratham 11 months ago
@lltrinida except pak (40 avg ) and SA against which both lara and sachin have same 46.. and another thing is if u see its really difficult to mainatin same after 130 tests punter and dravid are examples till 130 tests sachin and dravid had same avg even some use to say dravid is better in tests but , now u can see the diffrence clearly...may be lara realised that and quit at the right time...
36pratham 11 months ago
A good batsman is defined by his ability to handle pressure, and Sachin is one such batsman who crumbles under pressure. However, he will play for his personal records to create a benchmark for others to chase his records down, albeit with great difficulty. But does that make him the best of the best? Absolutely not! Simply because cricket is a game where you have to be a good team player, and here is where Ponting steals the show as a master batsman, champion and captain of Australian team!!
IronManu77 11 months ago
@IronManu77ponting avg.in tests after the retirement of mcgrath and warne is only41.His avg in both forms of the game has dropped to a great extent.In the previous years he enjoys his batting with no pressure what so ever as their are no. of match winner present in the team.Ponting is one of the biggest asshole cricket has ever seen with no ethics or sportsmanship.(Latest eg his spat with umpire aleem dar).
nj12qwaszx 11 months ago
@nj12qwaszx You are an asshole, and let me name a few more assholes in Indian cricket team: Sreesanth who loves to cry on the field in front of an audience, also gestures at batsmen with provocative symbols; Harbhajan Singh - need not say much about him; Gautam Gambhir - who likes to bump into bowlers shoulders and then cuss at them; the writing is on the wall for your Indian team, I am Indian origin by the way, and find Indians to be the biggest backstabbers in the world, so fuck off India!!!
IronManu77 11 months ago
@IronManu77 son of a bitch,bastard,.retarded racists on what basis you can call indians as backstabbers.Does an indian raped your mother and then refused to own you as your child.Is that the reason asshole?
nj12qwaszx 11 months ago
@nj12qwaszx ha ha nice reply dude...
36pratham 11 months ago
@36pratham thanx
nj12qwaszx 11 months ago
@IronManu77 ha ha lols that punter till 2007 i rate him as the one of the best batsmen in league of sachin and lara but now he is now just good like those of ganguly... he always played with the great infact best team in the world look at his avg after retirement of great players in 2007 his avg 38 , in 2008 47 , 2009 36 , 2010 38 he is just an avg player now when the situation really demanded from him, while sachin was the lone warrior during 90s for india... punter is a looser..
36pratham 11 months ago
@36pratham lolz to you too, that Sachin, lolz, he plays only for records, and it is funny how he gets out he believes that there is an agenda against him, lolz again. Also, 0 world cup victories for Sachin, I am not sure what you mean by lone warrior. The only innings i remember him playing well was Sharjah back in late 90s, but Punter has always raised his game on the big tournaments,...e.g. 2003 World Cup final where he hammered 140* against India. Ponting is the best, Sachin a loser!! :)
IronManu77 11 months ago
Om Shri Ganeshay Namaha. If you are going throgh troubles, chant sankata nashan Ganesha stotra 3 times a day. The power of lord Ganesha will wipe away your sorrows.
keanerocks78 11 months ago
everywhere sachin stands ahead of bradman but still both are best of there own eras....
36pratham 11 months ago
@36pratham Everywhere? Oh except for the stats, the bowler friendly pitches back then and the lackluster competition Sachin competes against. It's harder to be a hero these days because the top teams are evenly matched, that's why I can appreciate a standout like Sachin. But you can't compare him with Don. Don was twice as good in terms of stats. 3 times as good in terms of centuries made and twice the hero in a nation that was floundering in depression as opposed to a fledgling economic monster
Pigroota 11 months ago
@Pigroota wt stats below i prooved many things about stats but u cant understand anything lols... and u mean to say sachin didnt played in tough conditions..thats funny did bradman played on tough conditions he just played in 2 countries aus and eng... he never played great spinners great asian turning tracks i hope u know punters avg in india its in 20s lols... and why u say of these days y u forgot period of 1990s when sachin was the lone warrior for india..
36pratham 11 months ago
@36pratham "he never played great spinners"
WRONG!
Two examples off the top of my head, he faced Verity (ENG) in Tests & Grimmet (AUS) in First Class matches.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
Comment removed
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@36pratham No, Ponting beats all of them.
IronManu77 11 months ago
@36pratham "everywhere sachin stands ahead of bradman"
WRONG!
Bradman has a greater batting average in Tests and First Class.
Bradman has 5 scores greater than Tendulkar's highest Test score.
Bradman is the ICC highest rated batsman ever.
Just go look at ESPNcricinfo all time records and you'll find Bradman virtually everywhere.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@BlueKiaser u mom is a good house wife??
WRONG.. SHE IS A PORN ARTIST... GO WATCH IT ON TUBE 8...U WANT THE LINK FRECKELED BOY ??? :-D
rohan64bit 10 months ago
rookieash13 1 year ago
@rookieash13 rookieash13 "30000 first class runs"
WRONG! Tendulkar as at 25/3/2011 has 23,585 First Class Runs from 280 matches with a batting average of 59.86 runs.
Bradman finished his career with 28,067 First Class Runs from 234 matches average of 95.14.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
One of the best moments....
jai100000 1 year ago
is sachin the shortest cricketer ever in international cricket?
or is it Gautum ghambir?
I
skysportscricket 1 year ago
Is sachin the shortest cricketer in international cricket ever?
or is it Ian Bell?
Now thats a hard one.........
skysportscricket 1 year ago
He is not only a great batsman but a great man as well. I really pray for his health nad wealth from GOD.
6349396 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@6349396 all you indians are cheap and always will be
stop being cheap u fools and learn to lhelp eht poor that ive outside ur home
stop being cheap u bitches from my asshole
u cheap pieces of shit
name one time u've actually helped someone in ur life
its what i thought u cheap fuck that migrates to foreign countries to suck our blood
we should never have opened our borders to immigrant scum llike u
Indiansarecheap2 1 year ago
friends Donald Bradman is best ever batsman we know that but at that time cricket matches are only between australia and west indies and all runs of bradman are scored against west indies only but sachin scored runs against all the world teams that the fact
goruitft 1 year ago 2
@goruitft yaa friend this is right bradman only played against west indies and sachin play against all the world team
vikas1986ful 1 year ago
@goruitft you are incorrect. bradman played against england , sth africa , new zealand ect. who do you think the bodyline series was against? im sorry but do some research!
gpartrt 1 year ago
@goruitft Tendulkar against the world - especially against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh! Look it up. He's played more against these 2 worst teams than anyone else. Besides, Don scored most of his runs against England, not Windies! England was the best team in the world at the time, not to mention the fact that pitches were more conducive to bowling, not batting. There was no heavy roller, lots of grass. Batsmen have luxuries these days. Oh and did I mention Bodyline? Don is god compared to Sachin.
Pigroota 1 year ago
@goruitft Wanna compare stats? If Don played the same number of tests as Sachin he would have 150 centuries to his name. How many does Sachin have? 50? hahaha, Sachin is nothing compared to Don. Oh, and averages? Don is 40, yes FORTY ahead of the next best player. Sachin is another 10 behind that. Puts things in perspective no? I like Sachin, he is good for the game, but you parochial Don critics don't know what you are talking about, so just shut up and don't even bother comparing them
Pigroota 1 year ago
@Pigroota dude its not sachin its don who played against minnows through out his carrier... 1st of all zimbabwe was not a minnow other then aus they were tough for all teams specially at there home just like NZ they are worst now thats why india had not played against them from long time.. he has just played 7 matches against Bang, about bradman ind , SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh , they were just like ireland or nambia of today..
36pratham 11 months ago
@36pratham "1st of all zimbabwe was not a minnow"
WRONG! Zimbabwe definitely was a minnow;
All time Test record, 83 matches, 8 wins, 49 losses, 26 Draws = MINNOWS!
It took Zimbabwe 11 matches ('92-95) before they won a Test (4 losses).
It took them 31 matches ('92-98) before they won 2 tests (15 losses).
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@36pratham "SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh" ...
WRONG!
SA began International Test cricket in 1889.
By 1931, when Bradman first played against SA, their record was, 68 matches, 12 wins, 37 losses, 19 draws.
SA's record from '28-31 was 12 matches vs England, 3 wins, 2 losses, 7 draws.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@36pratham "its don who played against minnows"
& "with such teams bradman made his avg that much high"
& "just like don has 150+ against minnows like SA"
& "only against 1 established team eng against whome his avg is 61"
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
England and SA were definately NOT minnows. Bradman averaged 89.78 vs Eng and 201.50 vs SA.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@BlueKiaser SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh" ...
lols when did i said that SA was new i said ind and wi were new to cricket lols.. i hope ur eyesr are go to doc and have a check.....
yeh SA use to play in 1880s but after 1920 they play very less cricket... thats y they became minnow during that period.....
36pratham 10 months ago
@36pratham WRONG! & BINGO!
You either have a poor memory, or forget the lies you tell.
Read your comment @Pigroota (1 month ago). Use Find "he has just played 7 matches against Bang, about bradman ind , SA and WI were new to international cricket even less then minnows like bangladesh"
Your excuses for Bradman's dominance are pathetic. SA beat England in previous 2 serious during the time you declare them as minnows. W R O N G !!!
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
@BlueK dude i will again say the same thing india and WI were new to international who debuted even after bradman debut... and SA was minnow who did not play much during bradman period as u know there was gap 1914-20 after that play ver less cricket infact in between years they use to skip also... they were just like bangladesh of todays period... even bangladesh has also beaten west indies 2-0, and they are regularly beating teams in odis also...
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Don't be stupid. Prior to Bradman's Test career, South Africa had played 58 Tests and won 11 of those. During Bradman's Test career of 52 matches, South Africa played 37 international test matches.
Bradman played against SA in '31/32. SA's series prior to this they won against England and they also won their next series after Bradman's against NZ.
Comparing SA vs Bangladesh is just as pathetic as Bradman vs Tendulkar.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser lols i didnt asked u about few bad inngs its about 2 , 3 years after the retirement of all these players ponting never reached 50 again.... lols u talking about sachin 1st 4 years... lols u talking about 16 , 17 yrs old kid how many get chance even to play in test cricket at this age... but still his avg was 41 in 1990 and 1992.... and 1993 it was 91..... ponting debuted at age of 21 , even ur great bradman debuted at age of 20...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser u talk about sachin worst years were from 2003 to 2007 but sachin avg in 2004 was 91and 2007 55.... so u cant say its worst... if same would had happened to ponting i woudnt had said the same..like in 1 year his avg was just in 30s if it would had climbed to 50 or 60 + atleast , but 3 times avg in 30s and not even once touched 50....
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser ohk u told me to accept andy flower greater than sachin i would have surely accepted if his avg would be better than sachin in odis and if he his avg vs aus would be atleast 50+ not 14.... andy flower avg against.. england just 33 .. his avg against sri lanka... is just 38... while sachin avg is not less than 40 against any country....
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham My reference to Andy Flower was in relation to your argument about how hard it is for batsmen to score in weak teams. If your theory is correct, then Andy Flower is a better batsmen than Tendulkar. You can't have it both ways. If you are going to defend Tendulkar and say his average would be better if he played in a better team, then surely Andy Flower's would be far far better than Tendulkar's. Your argument, not mine.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser sachin best came in india poor era....
ohk... sachin best came 1997 to 2002... well u comparing a 24- 30 year person who is 8, 9 years experianced in cricket... and this is the period when any criciketer reaches his peak according to all greats and experts... u comparing it to a 37-38 year old cricketer who is playing from last 21 years..
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham One minute you tell me that Ponting only performed well when Australia was a strong team, next minute you defend Tendulkar and say Tendulkar performed well due to his age and experience. Well sunshine, using your argument, Ponting's peak form between '02-'06 was due to his age and experience and nothing to do with the team he played in.
You just continue to make up pathetic excuses for Tendulkar that have absolutely no statistical evidence or correlation. Admit it, Bradman is best.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser quite simply, sachin is the best batsmen in the history of the game. Bradman played during the World War 2 Period. seriously? the game has changed almost completely since then. the type of bowlers that sachin has faced and the type of games sachin has been involved in is totally different to what Bradman faced. c'mon mate, just face it. Sachin has been playing right throughout the greatest era of cricket and has dominated parts of it. Bradman trained with cavemen for goodness sake.
Moeine93 9 months ago
@Moeine93 Tell me these "dominated parts" of cricket by Tendulkar? Tendulkar has been rated the ICC Best Test Batsmen for < 13% of his batting career. Is that what you mean by "dominated parts". He "dominated" Test cricket for <13% of his career. That's a pretty poor statistic for the "best batsmen in the history of the game".
As usual, just another Bradman Denier suffering Tendulkar Brain.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser sometimes statistics don't tell the whole story. Yes, Bradman may have an average of 99 or whatever it is. he played in an era where the ODI game wasn't even invented nor was the T20 format. and my goodness the type of bowlers back then were not good enough to clean the shoes of bowlers in this 90's and 00's generation. Tendulkar is the best batsmen of all time, this is from a neutral point of view. As a Pakistan fan, it's not easy to admit it. but dude he really is the greatest ever
Moeine93 9 months ago
@Moeine93
1. Statistics are almost everything in cricket & Bradman's statistics are overwhelming.
2. No ODI or T20 format is no fault of Bradman and has no place in this argument.
3. Bradman faced many great bowlers during his era.
4. Dale Steyn is the only great bowler currently playing. Batting has NEVER been better than right now.
5. You can not have a neutral view when you know so little of Bradman's era. It simply displays your lack of respect for cricket's history.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser you aussies just do not give up lol. fact: the bowlers Bradman faced were nothing compared to even average bowlers of Tendulkars era, nevermind the best bowlers. the only thing Bradman has to hold with his name is his average. nothing else. when will you realise that Cricket advanced and has changed almost totally since when he played. if you love statistics so much, Bradman played 20 years of cricket and couldn't gain half of what Tendulkar gained. in a terrible era of cricket.
Moeine93 9 months ago
@Moeine93 I can tell you know virtually nothing about Bradman and his era. This is why you generalise with opinions like only Bradman's average and poor bowlers of Bradman's era.
In Bradman's 20 years of cricket, he missed 8 international Test Matches. Tendulkar has missed 14. Bradman has scored more first class runs than Tendulkar.
Bradman dominated his era like no other batsmen in cricket history. Tendulkar has not dominated his era. Tendulkar is one of many with a 50+ test avg ATM.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser How has Tendulkar NOT dominated? The only 200 in an ODI, Ranked best ODI and Test Batsman, 50 centuries....you saying that he knows nothing about Bradman, well you obviously know nothing about the little master. And what you said about Dale Steyn being the only good bowler is bullshit. Cricket has come on so much since Bradmans day.
CiTyOfGoD96 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 Dale Steyn is currently the only great test bowler playing. My definition of a great bowler is one who has taken at least 50 wickets and has a bowling average < 25runs per wicket. Go to cricinfo and look at best bowling averages and you'll find this (except they use min 2000 deliveries instead of my 50 wickets criteria). They list 72 bowlers. Dale Steyn the only current one on the list.
Please quantify your ranked best ODI and Test batsmen. Not according to ICC.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 Tendulkar supporters have stated that Tendulkar has dominated and I have questioned this and asked for evidence and examples. Bradman dominated. If Bradman's the benchmark, then Tendulkar has NOT dominated. My comments are comparative to Bradman, given that's my argument. It is Tendulkar supporters stating Tendulkar is the greatest ever and better than Bradman. So do you honesty believe that Tendulkar has dominated more than Bradman. Of course he hasn't. Unless you're delusional.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 dude leave him he is psycho... he is in every sachin video trying to proove his overrated bradman best....
according to him those larwood and all are great bowlers who just played 10, 15, 20 matches in there carrier lols.....
i had a long arguments with him and i found him just phsyco trying to proove his bradman best...
for that he even smetimes said that there are many players in today era also better than sachin.....
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham Really? Haha, he obviously cannot face the truth. It is funny how all Australians think Bradman is the best, but the rest of the world can accept that Tendulkar is the true master...
CiTyOfGoD96 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 Why does the very first sentence of ESPNcricinfo's profile for Bradman say "Unquestionably the greatest batsman in the game"???
& Tendulkar's says "Perhaps the most complete batsman and the most worshipped cricketer in the world".
I would say they are both accurate statements.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser Tendulkar is not going to say that he is the greatest player of all time? Which he is..
CiTyOfGoD96 9 months ago
@36pratham You won't debate me because I keep proving you WRONG with your crappy LIES.
Kallis has a better batting Test average and more man of the match performances than Tendulkar, so don't be so arrogant about Tendulkar.
Some of the English bowlers First Class statistics from Bradman's era;
Tate wkts 2784 & avg 18.16,
Verity 1956 & 14.90,
Bedser 1924 & 20.41,
Bowes 1639 & 16.76,
Voce 1558 & 23.08
& Again, MORE LIES BY 36pratham. Bowes played 15 all others listed played at least 27 test.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser i didnt continue debate with u because u are psycho who dont have any other work just surfing where can bash sachin nothing else......
other than variety there no other good bowler he faced veirty was ohk good but not at all great.... his avg became less than 25 just becuase of his avg against minnows india....
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser only left is bedser he was good but it debuted in 1946 so he played very less match against bradman...... so in all he just played against only 1 good bowler verity thats it.... lols....
36pratham 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlueKiaser Australia and South Africa had both had about 10 months since their last series.
That's the way it was with international test cricket in that era. They did not have jets
what ever the reason is the thing is aus and england were regular into cricket while SA use to play very less sometimes gap of more than 1 year sometimes gap of 2 years and sometimes even 3.......
SA was definate minnow...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
and about kallis... 1st of all sachin is far better than him in odis.... and about test matches....
whats his avg against australia the top team just 41.... he never played against the great bowler of SA ....
just see the support he get from his fellow players most of the the in 100s there is centurion with him....
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
yeh his avg is slightly better thanks to his team who supported him very well and great bowlers because of which he has so many nout outs and he has great avg.....
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser and u talk about match winning.... of kallis... tell me why he has just 1 match winning knock against australia.... and that too in 2009 when now australia is most weak team compare to there previous 20 years team......
SA is a top team get great players and bowlers...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
see this kack kallis is SA 4th or 5th bowler and his avg is 32.... while indian main strike bowler bowling avg zaheer khan is 31.94.... lols i hope ur brain will get something now.....
its bowlers that win test matches now batsman dumbo....
thats why in 1 match brian lara scored 351 and still WI lost.....
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser s
see this jack kallis is SA 4th or 5th bowler and his avg is 32.... while indian main strike bowler bowling avg zaheer khan is 31.94.... lols i hope ur brain will get something now.....
its bowlers that win test matches now batsman dumbo....
thats why in 1 match brian lara scored 351 and still WI lost.....
36pratham 9 months ago
@CiTyOfGoD96 Tell me where Tendulkar is ranked best ODI & Test Batsmen?
ICC Test batting ranked EQUAL #1 with Kallis.
ICC ODI batting ranked 10th.
I do hope that you are not going to be another 36pratham and present nothing more than LIES, unrelated stats and personal attacks?
Name me one bowler other than Dale Steyn who you consider a current Great bowler?
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
if he would had get the kind of team india is now or if he would had get the kind of team ponting or bradman got his avg would be atleast 10 + to his current avg.....
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham I don't believe that, but even if Tendulkar's average was at least 10+ better than his current average, it would still be over 30runs less than Bradman's.
Bradman is the Greatest batsmen ever and you continue to show your delusional ignorance and lack of respect to cricket's history.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
and about SA of bradman period... yeh offcourse they were minnow of that period just like bangladesh... even bangladesh.. has beaten west indies zimbabwe...
and dont talk about how much SA played during bradman era and all that just say how much SA played when bradman 1st time played against SA because bradman just played in 1 series against SA in 1931.....
cricket again started in 1920 , while SA played after gap of 2 years in end of 1921
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser
than almost after 1 year at the end of 1922,
than gap of more than 1 year... in 1924 in june...
than after a gap of more than 3 years in 1927 dec... lols who wont call tham minnow.... now...
than against gap of almost 2 years in 1929....
than against after gap of almost 2 years in 1930 dec... and finally then won 1 match lols... i am sure if bangladesh plays like that against 1 team continously they will surely won atleast 1 match... but dont forget thay had beaten wi and zim
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueK only murli lols.. what u talking about man what about akram , ambrose, walsh, mcdormot, mcgrath, warne, pollock, donald etc.... lols... u can say anyting just to proove ur bradman greats lols.... what a fanatic u are....
dude even gough, caddick,lee, akhtar, anderson vetori are better bowlers than those club lever bowlers that bradman faced.... u can rate him best but not me who never played any team stronger than his own team.. and who hit just 6 sixes in his whole carrier..
36pratham 9 months ago
@36pratham You don't even know what bowlers Bradman faced. If you had read some history or made any effort to look at Bradman's records and playing era you would be naming those bowlers.
It is much easier to live in denial.
You chose not to read and learn about Bradman's era because you would have to face up to the reality of Bradman being a greater batsman than your pin-up boy.
Using Bradman's 6 sixes ... your arguments are seriously getting shamefully pathetic now.
BlueKiaser 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlueKiaser arwood played 21 avg 28..
bowes played 15 and just 6 against australia.....
ken farnes played just 15 ...
lols now where did i lie u can just say anyhing to proove ur overhyped bradman above...
36pratham 9 months ago
@BlueKiaser and if zim is minnow to u then eng is also minnow of bradman period, yes now zim is minnow but from last 8 or 10 yes india had not played against zim and suring 2000 yeh zim was weak but not minnow thats why india use to loose series to zimbabwe... head to head just like australia i quite strong to eng simmilarly india was strong to zim but still they were not minnow....
36pratham 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlueKiaser just like don has 150+ against minnows like SA"
& "only against 1 established team eng against whome his avg is 61"
lols when did i said that i think ur eyes are weak go to a doctor...
bradman avg against england is 82 and it was only establish team of that period as weak to aus so offcourse not a a strong team.... so no one can say did bradman ever scored against any good strong team....
36pratham 10 months ago
@Pigroota can u give such teams even test status offcourse not with such teams bradman made his avg that much high... eng and aus were only establshed teams that time among 2 eng were already at 2nd lols.. how can that team be strong or even if it was strong lets say then bradman just scored only against 1 strong team... lols.. then how can that batsmen be all time great... he throughtout his life played mostly in eng and aus never in played turning asian wickets , never played odis...
36pratham 11 months ago
@Pigroota now use ur brain and think urself without being bias erase strong teams like aus,pak, SA,sl and think if sachin had played against teams like bangladesh ,nambia, ireland mind u he has avg of 136 against bang just like don has 150+ against minnows like SA ,ind offcourse more then 150 and only against 1 established team eng against whome his avg is 61 but playing with all advantages like without any pressure , no hectic schdule, less cricket (no odis).....
36pratham 11 months ago
@goruitft It's bad enough for one Tendulkar Brain fanatic to make a false statement, but to then have 2 more give him a thumbs up just highlights how uneducated these Tendulkar supporters are.
Don Bradman scored over 28,000 first class runs at an average of 95. Almost 7,000 of those were international test runs against England, South Africa, India & West Indies. 447 of those runs were against West Indies.
Learn your history before embarrassing yourselves.
BlueKiaser 10 months ago
1 reason why India gets very few golds in the Olympics is bcoz Indians concentrate too much in cricket. I don't think its even in the Olympics & when you compare with China, which isn't much more developed, it just makes you think is there any use of India being too good in cricket. After all its just 1 game. Debate on this.
giriisindahouse 1 year ago
Full Desert storm match available at my channel...playlist soon
imemadhu 1 year ago
oh ba.. jo ni inney! visit my channel n sub..
MegaTruecolours 1 year ago
@zk7975 ur bullshit
rsfan12341 1 year ago
@zk7975 dude ur fucked
rsfan12341 1 year ago
To achieve so much and be so humble, and always bringing out the kid in himself, it's amazing. If there's one sports star that young kids should look up to, it's him. Ponting, Tiger Woods, David Beckham? No Sachin Tendulkar is perfection.
kantk2008 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrMahajana 1 year ago
super
srdhrns17 1 year ago
super
srdhrns17 1 year ago
super
srdhrns17 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hindu national song
kaam hamara thoolan thakri ,
nangi kardi kabo na pakri ,
chiri oray to mai dar jaaun,
mughlo se kese lar paaon
said by hindus in the battlefield at pani pat and said till they got freedom in 1947
Benchod mother fucker cow piss cola shit eater hindu tum log bohut jald dobara musalmano ke gholam banadiye jaogay
gay hind gay karam chand gaand di
zk7975 1 year ago
Super Master...
sunnyforeyou 1 year ago
ponting has played 100 matches less in odis than sachin and scored 4k runs less.He will surely hit those 4k in 100 matches.he has scored at the same rate as sachin.
sachin in 171 tests hits 14k runs and ponting in 145 tests hits 12 k runs
so whats so much of a diff between em i dont understand,moreover ponting won 3 world cups,captains the team and is a regular member of the aussie team which kicks out players if they dont perform.Ponting debut 95,sachin debut 89...
Does anyone have an answer?
KINGMJ1990 1 year ago
@KINGMJ1990 statistics are not the only yardstick by which u shud measure any player...see them play and u will get ur answers...
peacewithmyanger 1 year ago
@KINGMJ1990
sachin mts 171 inn 280 runs 14240 100s 49
ponting mts 148 inn 251 runs 12250 100s 39
you ar rigt he played 23 matches than sachin but look at the innings
only 29. he have to score 1990 at the avg of 68.
can't say about the year of debut. six yeaqr gap but only 23 match differ.
can you image a 16 year onld boy facing wolds best baller like arkram & wakar.
jaduu1735 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KINGMJ1990 sachin mts 171 inn 280 runs 14240 100s 49
ponting mts 148 inn 251 runs 12250 100s 39
you ar rigt he played 23 matches than sachin but look at the innings
only 29. he have to score 1990 at the avg of 68.
can't say about the year of debut. six yeaqr gap but only 23 match differ.
can you image a 16 year onld boy facing wolds best baller like arkram & wakar.
jaduu1735 1 year ago