please dont be an ignorant, dont be part of the capitalist/imperialistic shit calling USA America, America is a continent.. and calling USA America its like stole the name from the other countries... because all of the countries in North America and South America are America
Democracy is an operative system. The Republic is the hardware. They don't oppose each other in anyway. Republicanism has taken many forms throughout History. It's only a foundation for an alternative system to monarchy. It can be many things it depends of what you do with it. I don't quite understand the terms in which you present this whole thing.
This is a great video! But I have one problem with it at the 10:00 mark - He uses the conversion of the Roman republic as an example of how 'democracy itself is not a stable form of government'. That makes no sense. He would have to say 'republic itself is not stable' for the statement to be logical.
Sadly, both statements appear to be true. did you know that already in America, 1 in 10 depends on the government for food (via food stamps)?
A republic can have any laws it decides that it wants. Look at the wonderful government called The Democratic People's Republic of Korea. That's not an oligarchy? Even republics can be oligarchies. So the only system of government that exists is oligarchies?
great video! i wish there was a mention of the oligarchy of the corporations. america is being ruled by corporations. corporations put men in power. corporations force feed what's good for their companies onto the people. we need a new system to control the power of corporations, something the world hadn't seen the full power of until the last 200 years. at the very least, the last 100 years.
@Aarontc2009 , you are absolutely correct and the conservative supreme court consolidated corporate power by giving them individual rights. Republicans hardly stand for a Republic or even close to being constitutional moderates. Slavery existed in the south in the 1970's. Vagrancy laws forced blacks to work off jail time in the mills and factories that refused to hire them legally. The Southern States are the reason the federal government needed to expand their role, to enforce the constitution.
totally insightful and thanx man i was really clueless...
BUT the thing about the jury... if i am not mistaken it has to be unanimous as you said, but if its not the man does not go free... he only goes free if there is a unanimous decision for him to go free. if there is not, the verdict is postponed until there is a unanimous decision
.....and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under god.... pledge of allegiance is under fire supposedly for the word god but the word republic is the real reason its under fire.
The description of oligarchy America appears to fit it pretty well already. And the group of people is composed of bankers, big corporations and the elected government(do i forget some?).
A good analysis and I agree with it. Most can recognize our country is going downhill and fast. The distribution of our nation's wealth is skewered and a few percentage receive most of the GDP. Our infrastructure is failing, our educational system is on the decline, unemployment is increasing, the dollar is decreasing in value and we are in a depression. I want a republic that represents the people, not a select few.
Except for free-enterprise capitalism, all political systems including democracy (tyranny by the majority) require deception and force to exist. thus are immoral and harmful to human beings. Only free-enterprise capitalism is entirely voluntary, free-choice, consistent with the nature of conscious beings, and thus is beneficial, moral and just: offering freedom to everyone.
An honest, legitimate government would by necessity be both a competitive, profit-oriented service and an individual-rights protection business. In some areas, possibly several competing businesses, organizations, or companies might offer the same services in competing for citizens as customers.
For example, national defense and police protection would immediately strengthen toward total effectiveness [i.e., prevention] as purpose and efficiency soared. Moreover, a non-force [moral] government would mean no taxes, no irrational controls or destructive regulations, no government corruption, no neocheaters, no wars, and a spectacularly prosperous, healthy, happy society.
How can you, in the context of bailouts, bankruptcies and other financial nightmares, still assert that "purpose and efficiency" as well as "total effectiveness" are hallmarks of free-enterprise capitalism (which is an economic and not a political system)? The waste, corruption and ineptitude of these have been exposed yet again. The best protection for any society is an informed, active and involved populace, because no system is free from corruption in practice, and theories are only that.
Pt. 4: competing for citizens as customers subject to the same competitive influences and disciplines as business to lift life & improve quality and value. The ordered purpose of [competitive] business would reign; the arbitrary disorder of mystical/neocheating, force,-backed [monopolistic, death-oriented] governments would vanish.
~ Wallace, Dr. Frank R., Phd., Neo-Tech Cosmic Power Now!
We still have the freedom to vote for who we want. Although "they" give us the choice between Pepsi or Coke, we don't have to vote for either. I voted for Nader. I don't believe in the fear tactic of "wasting" my vote by not voting for either choice "they" chose for us -- whether it really counted or not, I made a statement of self expression.
You should have mentioned that to the right is corporatism; privatization. At least when government controls something the people can have control by controlling their government (whether they do or don't is up to the people.) With everything is privatized, only the elite control everything. That's what some people mean when they call the right "Fascist" as well.
He does forget free-enterprise, but what you say about it is not so. I placed some comments on p. 1 that may be useful.
Competition is the only form of order that exudes free choice, growth, honesty, happiness, prosperity, consciousness, and value production. All other forms of "rule" are destructive, subject to dishonesty, violence, & "tribal" irrationality.
Please see mises (dot) org for a deeper primer on all this.
Good vid. But seems to me like Oligarchy since day one. Which is another way of saying rule of elite. The system of the day during the crafting of the constitution was slavery remember. Also, women had No say either. So in a broad sense the Oligarchy was the white male in general. But even the poor white male was at the bottom, but specfically we all know even among the white males -there were those who always were calling the shots behind the scenes. Oligarchy since day one people...
One question though does Nazism actually represent 100% total government ... this is a question I've been asking myself in light of all the misrepresented history of Germany thats been taught today
Anyways Germany is fast developing into a research topic for me.
Ps: this takes nothing away from your clip ... hopefully everybody will turn off their TV's and start researching a wide variety of topics.
Hmmm. I wonder how life in America would be today if women never got the right to 'voice out' or vote. Or the English never brought slavery here... maybe we need to tell the blacks to go scream at England for slavery reparations... maybe the English can pay for all the welfare and the costs of housing the poor innocent black people in our prisons. Maybe our entire 'system of the day' wouldn't be so SCREWED up if we didn't have these factors MUCKING it up all the time. Just a thought...
@lelandshane , then what part of the constitution allowed any slavery? No matter what percentage of the population is enslaved. Post Civil War the constitution was amended to more clearly prohibit slavery. The Civil War was over slavery, states rights was always used to defend slavery and is a southern view. The victor writes history not the loser.
Taxation is hardly equal to slavery. What you seem to forget is that taxation under Obama is lower than the Reagan or Bush administration.
It can be argued that the Civil War was REALLY over industrializing ALL of the U.S. and slavery had to be eliminated to eliminate the agriculture society of the South. In other words, for initiating "corporate control" of America. Slavery was not eliminated, it just took another form. I was initially taught that Lincoln was such a "good" man but later believe that he was just another paid-off politician to support the corporations.
@abraham1934 the beginning of the republic was not perfect but it was so much better than what the papal states in europe had. a conspiracy to take away our republic has been occuring since this country was born.
I guess the Republic dosn't exist either. Meaning Republic is ruled by law and the law is established by few to many. So really it's another type of Democracy.
yes its another type of Democracy and they call it a Republic if that will make you feeeel good . but your wrong a trial by jury has to be unanimous and if you can't understand that then Oh well maybe try and layoff the Flouride.
It seems that Democracy and Republic should be switched on the chart since in Democracy there is essentially "mob" rule and thus is more closely associated with an anarchy. While the established government of a republic has more power and is representative in nature. These representatives are fewer than the people and thus are closer to an oligarchy.
I think we're on #7/#8. Our country, with this stimulus package (and the one last year), just signed their blood on the dotted line of dependency, which is a fast track to bondage.
I love this vid. It's very well done, and kept simple enough that you'd have to be totally daft not to understand.
Apply these facts to our current political landscape. Not just in your country but on a global scale. Pay attention to what treaties are signed and what countries are going to war. Look at who benifits from it. Go beyond the veil of the media, don't believe everything they tell us, read between the lines.
The best place to hide something is right out in the open.
haha well thats inciteful, I guess the only question that remains is; Who brought around the sign-up sheet for our oligarchy and why did he/she skip my house. lol
Is gavinson a complete idiot. I think so. In a Republic you are FREE..to make of life what you will. The poor will always be with you. Quite honestly, the eradication of religous charities who were truly motivated by commitment to God has contributed to more poverty. Welfare has really helped to create wealth and stability. What an idiot...you can't see we are on our way to becoming CUBA!!
Excellent video. Thanks for taking the time and energy to allow the rest of us to share the real meaning of a republic to our friends and loved ones so that we don't so quickly lose our personal freedom.
The promotion of economy does the opposite in helping economy, it makes people feel responsible, the reality is that economy now is based upon managing our dysfunction due to the loss of again instinctive intuitions the formula to addiction...I know this to be true having once been consumed by economy, I am now extracted and simply learning what I can so when IT comes down I will be prepared to help others recover..Depressions are contrived by doctrines through our media...
Indoctrination in the inevitibility of gradualness is a marxist tool in affecting chnage through contagious thinking and doctrines, like seatbelt laws, war on drugs, is actually against the people, not drugs, just like war on terrorism, these are symbolism like the American dream, people loose instinctive intuition through adaptation in economy as we loose natural ability we fall to sleep through the addiction processes of economic technology
Actually, what it comes down to is: if you are poor you need to be on the democratic side but if you have plenty of money and don't care about the lives of others, please, by all means, go republican.......
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why not take the good parts of capitalism and socialism and use some of both?Who came up with this video?They must not have been around for the last 8 years to see what has happened to our country under the republican rule. We have lost jobs, our homes, our cars and some of us have lost our families because of the lack of leadership.Republicans care only for themselves and their families.
you are stuck in the left right paradime maybe you havent been around for last 6 thousand years! but sorry to tell you they all work for the global Banking Cartel Obama Bush Clinton it dosn;t matter. Investor is just another way to SUCKER!
So i get it anyone who doesnt understand it. you just lable brainwashed. Thats not too far off from jews, who will lable anyone who disagree with them antisemite.
there is only 2 things i hate with americans!! i really hate them because of these:
1. they dont understand that ashkenazim control USA and not the people
2. they dont understand that the forefathers in 1776 were SATANIC MASONIC MEMBERS that wanted a state built on masonic rules, meaning of satanic rules.. just watch statue of liberty! plz sheeple american dont reply, i have seen the evidence
what does the statue of liberty have to do w/ Satan or our founding fathers, dip shit. The statue of liberty was not built until much later, LOL. you don't want anyone to respond to your comment because you simply dont have an argument. Go crawl back in the hole you came from, please.
if you study masonic symbols you the braindead retard chickenbrain rathead zombie fool will understand that the liberty stands for satan!
let me give u another example you brainwashed fool. of all the NAMES in the word the ATEIST people call the first human to be a WOMAN and her name is LUCY comes from LUCIFER! now i hope from my heart that you will never know the truth, let a curse be upon people like urself.
WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HAHAHAHAHA! The first known, researchable human was named Lucy after a female research team member. The gender of this specimen was FEMALE. as for liberty standing for satan...WTFFFFF? Realize that is merely your dumbfounded opinion, where is the fact? In no language does LIBERTY = SATAN. I did expect your pathetic name calling though, only someone so childish would spit such nonsense. You sir, FAIL. Try again.
...I wish I could consider you brainwashed, but i honestly don't know ANY other individual that holds your ridiculous views. Meaning, you are alone in your insanity. You belong in an asylum.
my last comment! i didnt insult u, it was u! i blocked u because of the way you are. you are braindead and its impossible to talk to you. you are braindead because u believe that airplane wings can cut STEEL, steel wires, concrete walls, concrete floors and yes 911 was the greatest tv fakery but u wouldnt understand it because:
y o u a r e b r a i n w a s h e d
and go back to sleep and ur bushi gonna take good care of your filty life. stay far far away from me.
you are braindead because u believe that airplane wings can cut STEEL, steel wires, concrete walls, concrete floors and yes 911 was the greatest tv fakery but u wouldnt understand it because:
I did say this video sounds almost like republican supporter playing word games, did i not? and i stated that i dont believe in trickle down theory of economy...? are we hearing achoes?
I thought this was a great video also. but i still dont believe in trickle down theory of economy. this almost sounds like republican supporter playing word games.
Great Video!!!! Thank You. I homeschool my daughter and have been looking for a really simple effective way to teach her government. Your video is a great start.
To suggest that Lenin and Hitler road on the backs of Anarchist revolutions is abhorrently false, and I think anyone who understands history knows that these two - during Red Terror under Lenin and throughout Hitler's entire rule - went at length to put down Anarchists.
And Nazism/Fascism are far from "far-left". Governmental systems do not make a system "right" or "left"; it makes it "libertarian" or "authoritarian".
August Pinochet was on the far-right; was he an Anarchist? Didn't think so.
You seem to contradict yourself in your first paragraph, FailJustPwnd. Lenin conspired in, and benefited from acts of terror, and so did Hitler.
As to the question of "right" or "left", the film maker is correct, and you are mistaken. The left has always represented the love of big government, and the right a disdain for it. That doesn't change simply because you think so.
Okay, so what about left-wing, Collectivist-Anarchists? Surely they don't love big government? And, as I mentioned, what about Augusto Pinochet? He was pro-free market, but was fiercely authoritarian.
I'm not suggesting that neither of them didn't implement terror; but that doesn't change the fact that both were anti-Anarchist, despite how this video depicted them.
PM me on why I contradict myself - I think that 500 characters is too short to have a legitimate discussion on this type of thing.
Elucidate. I know you think you're being clever, but you're not.
I already addressed how there could be anti-government leftists, and how there could be pro-government rightists. You have yet to defend your point that being a leftist and a Statist is mutually exclusive. The same applies with the position that you must hold by extension of this that being a rightist means that you must be an Anarchist - or, to be moderate, a Libertarian, which, in U.S. politics, has lost its meaning.
I could elucidate for days, and you would still continue to call things what they are not, just as you do here, as you totally mischaracterize the "point" you say I have made, and the "position" you say that I hold.
You simply do not, "get it", FailJustPwnd . . . or you are merely a troll. Either way, conversation with you is futile. You're on your own, Pookie. :)
There has been functioning anarchic societies throughout history, look up pre-conquered Ireland. To dismiss it as a tool used to create a vacuum of power, just to be taken over by another kind of Government is ignorant and prejudiced.
The video strongly suggests that a Republic is only the RIGHTEOUS type of Government to have. Again this is a very lowbrow view, people have diffrent priorities. You can't classify a government type as good or bad.
Anarchy is the law of the jungle, Pandamanrr. That means if I'm bigger or stronger than my neighbor, and I were disposed to rape his wife, murder his children, steal all of his possessions, and leave him buried up to his neck in shit, and then do the same, or anything else that pleased me to any of my other neighbors, until I either run out of neighbors, or run into a bigger or stronger neighbor, then there is nothing preventing me from doing as I please. You call that a "righteous" government?
what is your source for this 1000 years Anarchy in Ireland! and were you there and how old is stone hinge are you just making stuff up to sound cool are you still Sponging off mom and Dad! A Republic is ruled by Laws that are written by the People for the people what is Anarchy ? your emaginary Friend! that sounds rebel and cool like Trinkets And Bobbels
Which era of Ireland do you refer? Most countries are dynamic, not one dimensional, and show a couple forms of government but are based on the principle of one. Here in the U.S, we are a Constitutional Republic, or at least we are supposed to be. I think this video does a good job showing how the U.S and some other republic based countries are moving toward an oligarchy in a subtle manner to fool the people. The author does a well job of using Rome as an example of this transformation.
You are right as far as the government preference but oligarchy has, throughout history, been tyrannical and dependent on the public for servitude to exist. I don't know anyone here in the U.S. that desires that other than maybe the oligarchy itself. Our constitution gives us something to go back to once we have strayed too far from it. Cheers!
A democracy is still a democracy even if it has laws that protects the rights of the people. Please look up the correct definitions. The countries of Scandinavia are not republics, but democracies, and they are functioning just as well, if not better, than USA.
In conclusion, this video is a lowbrow falsification. If you really want to know about the diffrent types of governments, don't watch youtube videos, read books about it. I can recommend some to get you started.
Democracy is mob rule, Pandamanrr. That means if I raised a bigger mob than my neighbor, and we all voted to rape his wife, murder his children, steal all of his possessions, and leave him buried up to his neck in shit, and then do the same, or anything else that pleased us to any of his other neighbors, until we either run out of neighbors, or run into a bigger or stronger mob of voters, then there is nothing preventing us from doing as we please. You call that a "righteous" government?
You are wrong again, really I won't bother argueing with you. It's not my job to make sure you know the right definitions of certain words. If you want to debate you should atleast be well-informed, and I can tell that you're not.
You claim I am wrong, yet you offer not one single valid refutation of the obvious point of the argument. That is what we call a fundamental definition of the word, "cop-out" Pandamanrr.
A Democracy is A Democracy A Republic is A Republic! If you can't under stand the dictionary! Check to see how much Flouride is in your water supply you maybe having trubble with comprehending
Great vid. Definitely a great starter to discussions!
I'm amazed at the people pissed off and equating anarchy with democracy. Democracy is a form of government. Anarchy is the absence of government. They cannot exist simultaneously. The difference is that in a pure democracy there are no rights for individuals - all rights reside with the whole. In an anarchy individuals are not given any rights - you have whatever rights you take - because there is no government to bestow those rights.
In a democracy if the majority wants something I have they can take it and there is not a damn thing I can do about it. In an anarchy I can shoot every last one that comes on my land until I run out of ammo because I don't want you to have it!
If I like your hat, I take it. If you complain and piss me off, I kill you. What is anyone going to do about it when there is no law to hold me accountable?
That's where the bloodshed comes in. With no law and no government people can, and historically will, do whatever they please with no regard for anyone else.
Pure democracy is a beautiful thing when everyone agrees. The fact is that doesn't happen much.
See? That state of no law is chaos, disorder, but not necessarily anarchy. Anarchy means no rule, not no law. Law is a set of principles and/or mores for a society. Rule is the goon squad that would post those laws, and kill you if you don't follow them.
Who makes the rules is something else entirely.
Please understand, I think that even the most well intentioned, happy community of poets type anarchy is as possible as balancing a pencil upright on a ball in the wind.
Our nation's founders made it clear that the government does not bestow rights, though. They are inalienable, bestowed by life itself. "Anarchy" means no rule, but there are two kinds. Chaotic-anarchy is really just chaos, and instantly becomes despotism, aka gang rule (/watch?v=-d9wmqO2Khw). Anarcho-communism is an ideal society of self rule with no government or leaders, but with willful cooperation and understanding of harmony. It's an unachievable society, a fantasy of pacifist genii.
history will repeat itself, no doubt, people will rise up to defend their rights and millions will die that is history, this thing its one way or the other is the problem, universal thinking is the solution where all of the planet will rule together, no more money equally spread the housing, food, health, this is the only way for all to live together, no money means no greed, no greed all needs met, we could then enter space and colonize other planets to bring in resources to earth.
I really don't think you'll get too far convincing the world that Einstein was an idiot, though. However, a better argument against him would be that he refused to accept an expanding universe, even though it's now been taken as the state of things, and his own research was itself revealing such. He was still a most incredible person.
An evil Oligarchy afraid of the masses and needing living 'batteries' to power their 'matrix' simply creates the illusion of a democracy or republic to pacify the masses.
"Anarchy" is not fairly represented here. He's using chaos as anarchy as many have and do, but chaos is simply a state immediately before despotism. Anarchy as Noam Chomsky and Albert Einstein profess is also called anarcho-communism. It is a society of laws, morals, and integrated social life and peace. It is also known as Utopia, true anarchy, true communism, and due to human nature it is absolutely impossible. It requires that everyone in the society be fully enlightened and highly educatted.
nice comment nobody is perfect thats the best part of human nature inperfection like my spelling that u can still under stand even if its spelled wrong LOL
A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers; serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates; and directing distribution.
And just for the record, the people wanted Washington as a king and he declined. He didn't even want to be president. I guess being a slave owner was enough power for him.
As John Zerzan points out, Humanity has existed on this earth for around 100,000 years. It's has Civilization for only 10,000 years. So for 90,000 years, people got by perfectly ok without civilization.
And we didn't have all these fuck-awful commercials everywhere either...
Sure, why not? It is an 'ism' after all. Maybe even Americanism is an Americanism - like John Connor gave birth to the Terminator gave birth to John Connor.... a circlism.
Well done video, though the conclusion is drastically outdated since the tyranny of the elite has arrived long ago.
gr8vibes2 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
please dont be an ignorant, dont be part of the capitalist/imperialistic shit calling USA America, America is a continent.. and calling USA America its like stole the name from the other countries... because all of the countries in North America and South America are America
Franco13SC 4 weeks ago
every child should see this once a year at school where they should have a constitutional education month!!! like black history month
sicsempertyrannis187 1 year ago
oli rox!!:D
Kurufasulye06 1 year ago
Democracy is an operative system. The Republic is the hardware. They don't oppose each other in anyway. Republicanism has taken many forms throughout History. It's only a foundation for an alternative system to monarchy. It can be many things it depends of what you do with it. I don't quite understand the terms in which you present this whole thing.
stevewseven 1 year ago
Love IT!!!!!!!
MORE MORE MORE please
tuttar3 1 year ago
This is a great video! But I have one problem with it at the 10:00 mark - He uses the conversion of the Roman republic as an example of how 'democracy itself is not a stable form of government'. That makes no sense. He would have to say 'republic itself is not stable' for the statement to be logical.
Sadly, both statements appear to be true. did you know that already in America, 1 in 10 depends on the government for food (via food stamps)?
blogegog 1 year ago
has there been any anarchic countries? for a long period of time?
lilwayneisgarbage09 1 year ago
@lilwayneisgarbage09 Somalia for the last few years
blogegog 1 year ago
this was a great vidio
yoyomatthews 1 year ago
A republic can have any laws it decides that it wants. Look at the wonderful government called The Democratic People's Republic of Korea. That's not an oligarchy? Even republics can be oligarchies. So the only system of government that exists is oligarchies?
p12psicop 1 year ago
great video! i wish there was a mention of the oligarchy of the corporations. america is being ruled by corporations. corporations put men in power. corporations force feed what's good for their companies onto the people. we need a new system to control the power of corporations, something the world hadn't seen the full power of until the last 200 years. at the very least, the last 100 years.
Aarontc2009 1 year ago
@Aarontc2009 , you are absolutely correct and the conservative supreme court consolidated corporate power by giving them individual rights. Republicans hardly stand for a Republic or even close to being constitutional moderates. Slavery existed in the south in the 1970's. Vagrancy laws forced blacks to work off jail time in the mills and factories that refused to hire them legally. The Southern States are the reason the federal government needed to expand their role, to enforce the constitution.
zaurakdigis 1 year ago
totally insightful and thanx man i was really clueless...
BUT the thing about the jury... if i am not mistaken it has to be unanimous as you said, but if its not the man does not go free... he only goes free if there is a unanimous decision for him to go free. if there is not, the verdict is postponed until there is a unanimous decision
yosiberman 1 year ago
.....and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under god.... pledge of allegiance is under fire supposedly for the word god but the word republic is the real reason its under fire.
deletemepleez 1 year ago
Beautiful.
tuttar3 1 year ago
Proud Constitutional Moderate.
Goodspittin 2 years ago
Great information! Thank you for sharing this truth that we do not learn in school anymore.
ayemaya75 2 years ago 3
This is the stuff that isn't in the textbooks anymore! Well done!
JuniperSage1 2 years ago 5
The description of oligarchy America appears to fit it pretty well already. And the group of people is composed of bankers, big corporations and the elected government(do i forget some?).
Mendelevium146 2 years ago
I would like to point out however that it is natural for government to grow, their fore all government leads to an Oligarchy
trunkSapien23 2 years ago
such an insightful observation, thank you for your contribution
CSCredle 2 years ago
that was an amazing video.
bflanagan57 2 years ago 3
A good analysis and I agree with it. Most can recognize our country is going downhill and fast. The distribution of our nation's wealth is skewered and a few percentage receive most of the GDP. Our infrastructure is failing, our educational system is on the decline, unemployment is increasing, the dollar is decreasing in value and we are in a depression. I want a republic that represents the people, not a select few.
wmurray8 2 years ago 2
don't let them keep you in fear, love is what u need and it will set you free.
sdara357 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck you,fuck bejaman frankland,most of all fuck you.
themrnazi 2 years ago
thats the spirit
iceas12 2 years ago
Wake up Dorothy, you are back in Kansas
AlpenIT 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is so stupid
annatar3 2 years ago
Polowski is pushing us to a oligarchy. we are foobar
shartne 2 years ago
Pt. 1:
Except for free-enterprise capitalism, all political systems including democracy (tyranny by the majority) require deception and force to exist. thus are immoral and harmful to human beings. Only free-enterprise capitalism is entirely voluntary, free-choice, consistent with the nature of conscious beings, and thus is beneficial, moral and just: offering freedom to everyone.
Bestmountjoy 2 years ago
Pt. 2,
An honest, legitimate government would by necessity be both a competitive, profit-oriented service and an individual-rights protection business. In some areas, possibly several competing businesses, organizations, or companies might offer the same services in competing for citizens as customers.
Bestmountjoy 2 years ago
Pt. 3:
For example, national defense and police protection would immediately strengthen toward total effectiveness [i.e., prevention] as purpose and efficiency soared. Moreover, a non-force [moral] government would mean no taxes, no irrational controls or destructive regulations, no government corruption, no neocheaters, no wars, and a spectacularly prosperous, healthy, happy society.
Bestmountjoy 2 years ago
How can you, in the context of bailouts, bankruptcies and other financial nightmares, still assert that "purpose and efficiency" as well as "total effectiveness" are hallmarks of free-enterprise capitalism (which is an economic and not a political system)? The waste, corruption and ineptitude of these have been exposed yet again. The best protection for any society is an informed, active and involved populace, because no system is free from corruption in practice, and theories are only that.
gayelfmageezer 2 years ago
Pt. 4: competing for citizens as customers subject to the same competitive influences and disciplines as business to lift life & improve quality and value. The ordered purpose of [competitive] business would reign; the arbitrary disorder of mystical/neocheating, force,-backed [monopolistic, death-oriented] governments would vanish.
~ Wallace, Dr. Frank R., Phd., Neo-Tech Cosmic Power Now!
Thanks, & Study up at mises (dot) org
Bestmountjoy 2 years ago
good video
Dreadkid08 2 years ago 4
fav
ninjacup 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You fucking moron
nilbud 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this movie supports fascism and corporate oligarchies
oldhacks 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fucking retard
acidbath667 2 years ago
This information does not only apply to America - Very interesting and many thanks for posting
StopUnumNow 2 years ago 2
Why?
SavageArms357 2 years ago
Explaining a Government's proper and limited role in any society. America has (had?) an admirable Republic with a Constitution and Bill of Rights.
StopUnumNow 2 years ago 2
Oops, I read your comment wrong. I thought you said that this information does NOT apply to America.
Sorry.
SavageArms357 2 years ago
america is a shithole populated by retards and owned by corporations run by morons, oops this just in they sold you all to China.
nilbud 2 years ago
Retards - have to agree... 2/3 of all who voted for our 'cool' pres - good example of 'retards'. Absolutely.
AlpenIT 2 years ago 3
cause McCain would have been better? I think we were fucked both ways
Mendelevium146 2 years ago 3
@Mendelevium146
We still have the freedom to vote for who we want. Although "they" give us the choice between Pepsi or Coke, we don't have to vote for either. I voted for Nader. I don't believe in the fear tactic of "wasting" my vote by not voting for either choice "they" chose for us -- whether it really counted or not, I made a statement of self expression.
ayemaya75 2 years ago
5*'s and Fav'd...awesome video!!! =] THX
ifxman 2 years ago 7
9:05
norevelation 2 years ago 2
You should have mentioned that to the right is corporatism; privatization. At least when government controls something the people can have control by controlling their government (whether they do or don't is up to the people.) With everything is privatized, only the elite control everything. That's what some people mean when they call the right "Fascist" as well.
Neurolanis 2 years ago
He does forget free-enterprise, but what you say about it is not so. I placed some comments on p. 1 that may be useful.
Competition is the only form of order that exudes free choice, growth, honesty, happiness, prosperity, consciousness, and value production. All other forms of "rule" are destructive, subject to dishonesty, violence, & "tribal" irrationality.
Please see mises (dot) org for a deeper primer on all this.
Bestmountjoy 2 years ago
Good vid. But seems to me like Oligarchy since day one. Which is another way of saying rule of elite. The system of the day during the crafting of the constitution was slavery remember. Also, women had No say either. So in a broad sense the Oligarchy was the white male in general. But even the poor white male was at the bottom, but specfically we all know even among the white males -there were those who always were calling the shots behind the scenes. Oligarchy since day one people...
abraham1934 2 years ago
Sorry but slavery was not the sys of the day . Only 4% of southerner's owned slave's and none of them were Ever brought to the USA On Board
A US Flag Ship! Remember that's what they didn't Teach you in School the Fact's but you are correct
with the woman's right to vote The English were the slavers Not the Americans thats why we revolted ! Tax = slavery
lelandshane 2 years ago
I think you got the basics spot on ... you don't need anything else in there.
fav & 5*s.
TodMcInerney 2 years ago 6
thanks God bless
lelandshane 2 years ago
One question though does Nazism actually represent 100% total government ... this is a question I've been asking myself in light of all the misrepresented history of Germany thats been taught today
Anyways Germany is fast developing into a research topic for me.
Ps: this takes nothing away from your clip ... hopefully everybody will turn off their TV's and start researching a wide variety of topics.
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
Hmmm. I wonder how life in America would be today if women never got the right to 'voice out' or vote. Or the English never brought slavery here... maybe we need to tell the blacks to go scream at England for slavery reparations... maybe the English can pay for all the welfare and the costs of housing the poor innocent black people in our prisons. Maybe our entire 'system of the day' wouldn't be so SCREWED up if we didn't have these factors MUCKING it up all the time. Just a thought...
AlpenIT 2 years ago 3
@lelandshane , then what part of the constitution allowed any slavery? No matter what percentage of the population is enslaved. Post Civil War the constitution was amended to more clearly prohibit slavery. The Civil War was over slavery, states rights was always used to defend slavery and is a southern view. The victor writes history not the loser.
Taxation is hardly equal to slavery. What you seem to forget is that taxation under Obama is lower than the Reagan or Bush administration.
zaurakdigis 1 year ago
@zaurakdigis "The Civil War was over slavery".
It can be argued that the Civil War was REALLY over industrializing ALL of the U.S. and slavery had to be eliminated to eliminate the agriculture society of the South. In other words, for initiating "corporate control" of America. Slavery was not eliminated, it just took another form. I was initially taught that Lincoln was such a "good" man but later believe that he was just another paid-off politician to support the corporations.
ayemaya75 1 year ago
@abraham1934 the beginning of the republic was not perfect but it was so much better than what the papal states in europe had. a conspiracy to take away our republic has been occuring since this country was born.
deletemepleez 1 year ago
awesome vid. every American should see this and brush up on the basics. Then maybe we could see that we are repeating the mistakes of the past.
CardsDefense 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
you Satanist?
How many people have you seen that have been sacrificed to Satan?
Of these victims, what did you eat?
God has promised me that what you did to others: "It is already ready for you", at last!
Now you can finally see what is really a hell.
A large death entered in the midst of the people of Satan.
Prepare to die with dignity, at last!!!
Search for humanumgenus Playlists: "musica celeste"
The Blood of Jesus on the Cross is upon you for your immediate trial!
I am lorenzo scarola
lorenzojhwh 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 INSIDE JOB
akparker1 2 years ago
I guess the Republic dosn't exist either. Meaning Republic is ruled by law and the law is established by few to many. So really it's another type of Democracy.
Dejavu12321 2 years ago
yes its another type of Democracy and they call it a Republic if that will make you feeeel good . but your wrong a trial by jury has to be unanimous and if you can't understand that then Oh well maybe try and layoff the Flouride.
lelandshane 2 years ago
Thank you so much for this video.
mercen144 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is bologna and in reality almost the opposite. It is the left that seeks more government and has socialist leaning.
mossrun 2 years ago
It seems that Democracy and Republic should be switched on the chart since in Democracy there is essentially "mob" rule and thus is more closely associated with an anarchy. While the established government of a republic has more power and is representative in nature. These representatives are fewer than the people and thus are closer to an oligarchy.
urnman89 3 years ago
A Democracy collapses followed by a dictatorship."
1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
3. From courage to liberty;
4. From liberty to abundance;
5. From abundance to complacency;
6. From complacency to apathy;
7. From apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage"
What number are we on?
july6771 3 years ago
I think we're on #7/#8. Our country, with this stimulus package (and the one last year), just signed their blood on the dotted line of dependency, which is a fast track to bondage.
tbbuchanan 2 years ago 2
#8 seems to be the most obvious choice, but I hope at least 1/2 of us are moving from apathy to courage.
angelbe88 2 years ago
It sounds real similar to what is going on right now. Do they not say History repeats itself. It is time to take a stand and take our Republic back.
brder4ev 3 years ago 2
I love this vid. It's very well done, and kept simple enough that you'd have to be totally daft not to understand.
Apply these facts to our current political landscape. Not just in your country but on a global scale. Pay attention to what treaties are signed and what countries are going to war. Look at who benifits from it. Go beyond the veil of the media, don't believe everything they tell us, read between the lines.
The best place to hide something is right out in the open.
Think ahead.
faithfullyblind 3 years ago 6
haha well thats inciteful, I guess the only question that remains is; Who brought around the sign-up sheet for our oligarchy and why did he/she skip my house. lol
goryeyedbeast 3 years ago 3
This is a wonderful summation of current day events.
The question is are we as a people going to tolerate the tyranny that our last election set the stage for?
guitarman28208 3 years ago 3
great work!
the political compass is complete BULL, so called 'left' and 'right' always end up meeting at the North, your model is far better.
noisecape 3 years ago
Is gavinson a complete idiot. I think so. In a Republic you are FREE..to make of life what you will. The poor will always be with you. Quite honestly, the eradication of religous charities who were truly motivated by commitment to God has contributed to more poverty. Welfare has really helped to create wealth and stability. What an idiot...you can't see we are on our way to becoming CUBA!!
BrandNewOrange0914 3 years ago
thank you
supak0ma 3 years ago 4
Excellent video. Thanks for taking the time and energy to allow the rest of us to share the real meaning of a republic to our friends and loved ones so that we don't so quickly lose our personal freedom.
DeerAgeGuy 3 years ago 3
"i was picked to leeeeadddd not to readdddd!"
LOL
whispers83 3 years ago
The promotion of economy does the opposite in helping economy, it makes people feel responsible, the reality is that economy now is based upon managing our dysfunction due to the loss of again instinctive intuitions the formula to addiction...I know this to be true having once been consumed by economy, I am now extracted and simply learning what I can so when IT comes down I will be prepared to help others recover..Depressions are contrived by doctrines through our media...
NeoOneOrg 3 years ago
Indoctrination in the inevitibility of gradualness is a marxist tool in affecting chnage through contagious thinking and doctrines, like seatbelt laws, war on drugs, is actually against the people, not drugs, just like war on terrorism, these are symbolism like the American dream, people loose instinctive intuition through adaptation in economy as we loose natural ability we fall to sleep through the addiction processes of economic technology
NeoOneOrg 3 years ago
the government lover doesn't even understand that the system of anarchy would have laws. what an idiot!
jockdoubleday 3 years ago
Actually, what it comes down to is: if you are poor you need to be on the democratic side but if you have plenty of money and don't care about the lives of others, please, by all means, go republican.......
gavinson2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why not take the good parts of capitalism and socialism and use some of both?Who came up with this video?They must not have been around for the last 8 years to see what has happened to our country under the republican rule. We have lost jobs, our homes, our cars and some of us have lost our families because of the lack of leadership.Republicans care only for themselves and their families.
gavinson2 3 years ago
you are stuck in the left right paradime maybe you havent been around for last 6 thousand years! but sorry to tell you they all work for the global Banking Cartel Obama Bush Clinton it dosn;t matter. Investor is just another way to SUCKER!
lelandshane 3 years ago
So i get it anyone who doesnt understand it. you just lable brainwashed. Thats not too far off from jews, who will lable anyone who disagree with them antisemite.
dokkiro 3 years ago
Someone said Christianity is recycled paganism. a lot of people agree that christianity is good for economy.
dokkiro 3 years ago
there is only 2 things i hate with americans!! i really hate them because of these:
1. they dont understand that ashkenazim control USA and not the people
2. they dont understand that the forefathers in 1776 were SATANIC MASONIC MEMBERS that wanted a state built on masonic rules, meaning of satanic rules.. just watch statue of liberty! plz sheeple american dont reply, i have seen the evidence
Mahdiarmy 3 years ago
what does the statue of liberty have to do w/ Satan or our founding fathers, dip shit. The statue of liberty was not built until much later, LOL. you don't want anyone to respond to your comment because you simply dont have an argument. Go crawl back in the hole you came from, please.
esosj 3 years ago
if you study masonic symbols you the braindead retard chickenbrain rathead zombie fool will understand that the liberty stands for satan!
let me give u another example you brainwashed fool. of all the NAMES in the word the ATEIST people call the first human to be a WOMAN and her name is LUCY comes from LUCIFER! now i hope from my heart that you will never know the truth, let a curse be upon people like urself.
Mahdiarmy 3 years ago
WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HAHAHAHAHA! The first known, researchable human was named Lucy after a female research team member. The gender of this specimen was FEMALE. as for liberty standing for satan...WTFFFFF? Realize that is merely your dumbfounded opinion, where is the fact? In no language does LIBERTY = SATAN. I did expect your pathetic name calling though, only someone so childish would spit such nonsense. You sir, FAIL. Try again.
esosj 3 years ago
...I wish I could consider you brainwashed, but i honestly don't know ANY other individual that holds your ridiculous views. Meaning, you are alone in your insanity. You belong in an asylum.
esosj 3 years ago
Bet you thought you could "insult and block" like most other cowards, didnt you =)?
esosj 3 years ago
my last comment! i didnt insult u, it was u! i blocked u because of the way you are. you are braindead and its impossible to talk to you. you are braindead because u believe that airplane wings can cut STEEL, steel wires, concrete walls, concrete floors and yes 911 was the greatest tv fakery but u wouldnt understand it because:
y o u a r e b r a i n w a s h e d
and go back to sleep and ur bushi gonna take good care of your filty life. stay far far away from me.
Mahdiarmy 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i hate bush and his cronies, try again. The only difference between me and you is I am realistic, you are not.
esosj 3 years ago
you are braindead because u believe that airplane wings can cut STEEL, steel wires, concrete walls, concrete floors and yes 911 was the greatest tv fakery but u wouldnt understand it because:
y o u a r e b r a i n w a s h e d
Mahdiarmy 3 years ago 4
anyone else find the humor in conspiracists and extremists?
esosj 3 years ago
I did say this video sounds almost like republican supporter playing word games, did i not? and i stated that i dont believe in trickle down theory of economy...? are we hearing achoes?
dokkiro 3 years ago
I thought this was a great video also. but i still dont believe in trickle down theory of economy. this almost sounds like republican supporter playing word games.
dokkiro 3 years ago
what does trickle down have to do with this?
toaster005 3 years ago 2
"None Dare Call It Conspiracy", Gary Allen, 1971, ISBN: 0899666612
The primer for understanding the subversion of our nation. If you are lucky enough to find a copy at garage sale, thrift shop, grab it.
If not, portions are available online. Search the name (in quotes), then look for the entry of a website called "captaincanadacrusades".
nameofthepen 3 years ago 2
EXCELLENT video I learned a lot.
HighlandFreePress 3 years ago 2
Great Video!!!! Thank You. I homeschool my daughter and have been looking for a really simple effective way to teach her government. Your video is a great start.
CabbieJake 3 years ago 2
Great info and a fresh perspective though it would be better if it were more bipartisan.
TheGoldenRule4All 3 years ago
why not omnipartisan!!!! wOOOOO GOOOO PARTIES!!!
333SICKofANT 3 years ago
Excellent video. One of the rare videos that integrates and builds upon the lessons of History. 5 *s!
WhatIsNotSeen 3 years ago 2
This demonstration of what governments are seem to cast a grim reality of what is in store for us under an Obama regime!
dezurtdude 3 years ago
It really makes no difference, theguyfromthatstate. It's still unfair to the minority either way, isn't it?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
To suggest that Lenin and Hitler road on the backs of Anarchist revolutions is abhorrently false, and I think anyone who understands history knows that these two - during Red Terror under Lenin and throughout Hitler's entire rule - went at length to put down Anarchists.
And Nazism/Fascism are far from "far-left". Governmental systems do not make a system "right" or "left"; it makes it "libertarian" or "authoritarian".
August Pinochet was on the far-right; was he an Anarchist? Didn't think so.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
You seem to contradict yourself in your first paragraph, FailJustPwnd. Lenin conspired in, and benefited from acts of terror, and so did Hitler.
As to the question of "right" or "left", the film maker is correct, and you are mistaken. The left has always represented the love of big government, and the right a disdain for it. That doesn't change simply because you think so.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Okay, so what about left-wing, Collectivist-Anarchists? Surely they don't love big government? And, as I mentioned, what about Augusto Pinochet? He was pro-free market, but was fiercely authoritarian.
I'm not suggesting that neither of them didn't implement terror; but that doesn't change the fact that both were anti-Anarchist, despite how this video depicted them.
PM me on why I contradict myself - I think that 500 characters is too short to have a legitimate discussion on this type of thing.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
If you call a dog's tail a leg, FailJustPwnd, how many legs does a dog have?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Okay, that's a dodge.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
Is it really? Or is it really your reply?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Elucidate. I know you think you're being clever, but you're not.
I already addressed how there could be anti-government leftists, and how there could be pro-government rightists. You have yet to defend your point that being a leftist and a Statist is mutually exclusive. The same applies with the position that you must hold by extension of this that being a rightist means that you must be an Anarchist - or, to be moderate, a Libertarian, which, in U.S. politics, has lost its meaning.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
I could elucidate for days, and you would still continue to call things what they are not, just as you do here, as you totally mischaracterize the "point" you say I have made, and the "position" you say that I hold.
You simply do not, "get it", FailJustPwnd . . . or you are merely a troll. Either way, conversation with you is futile. You're on your own, Pookie. :)
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure that you're the troll here, not me.
Whatever man, live in your strange world where right-wing politics means being an Anarchist and left-wing politics means always being Authoritarian.
I'll live in the real world.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
can i come?
333SICKofANT 3 years ago
Sure, but it can get pretty boring around here.
FailJustPwnd 3 years ago
but i thought you were going to the real world.... that would never bore me... too many things to KILL!!!!!!!
333SICKofANT 3 years ago
So advocate that big business should dictate /govern everything? Where's the democracy in that?
FellingPX 3 years ago
Excellent vid! And spot on about the left (total government) vs. the right (anarchy).
bump1bump2 3 years ago
Oh, it didn't post the first part of my comment.
There has been functioning anarchic societies throughout history, look up pre-conquered Ireland. To dismiss it as a tool used to create a vacuum of power, just to be taken over by another kind of Government is ignorant and prejudiced.
The video strongly suggests that a Republic is only the RIGHTEOUS type of Government to have. Again this is a very lowbrow view, people have diffrent priorities. You can't classify a government type as good or bad.
Pandamanrr 3 years ago
thanks for sharing your perspective
xxwalkamongusxx 3 years ago
Anarchy is the law of the jungle, Pandamanrr. That means if I'm bigger or stronger than my neighbor, and I were disposed to rape his wife, murder his children, steal all of his possessions, and leave him buried up to his neck in shit, and then do the same, or anything else that pleased me to any of my other neighbors, until I either run out of neighbors, or run into a bigger or stronger neighbor, then there is nothing preventing me from doing as I please. You call that a "righteous" government?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
thats why the Irish are a Republic!Big thanks to Anarchy! for founding another Republic! if there never was any Anarchy we would never need Gov.
lelandshane 3 years ago
Ireland existed a 1000 years as an anarchist society, I really can't see what the point of your comment is, lelandshane.
Pandamanrr 3 years ago
what is your source for this 1000 years Anarchy in Ireland! and were you there and how old is stone hinge are you just making stuff up to sound cool are you still Sponging off mom and Dad! A Republic is ruled by Laws that are written by the People for the people what is Anarchy ? your emaginary Friend! that sounds rebel and cool like Trinkets And Bobbels
lelandshane 3 years ago
what does "stone hinge" (sic) have to do with Ireland? what exactly informs your knowledge of Ireland? why not stop discussing it?
spotbelly 3 years ago
Which era of Ireland do you refer? Most countries are dynamic, not one dimensional, and show a couple forms of government but are based on the principle of one. Here in the U.S, we are a Constitutional Republic, or at least we are supposed to be. I think this video does a good job showing how the U.S and some other republic based countries are moving toward an oligarchy in a subtle manner to fool the people. The author does a well job of using Rome as an example of this transformation.
furburglar 3 years ago
You are right as far as the government preference but oligarchy has, throughout history, been tyrannical and dependent on the public for servitude to exist. I don't know anyone here in the U.S. that desires that other than maybe the oligarchy itself. Our constitution gives us something to go back to once we have strayed too far from it. Cheers!
furburglar 3 years ago 2
A democracy is still a democracy even if it has laws that protects the rights of the people. Please look up the correct definitions. The countries of Scandinavia are not republics, but democracies, and they are functioning just as well, if not better, than USA.
In conclusion, this video is a lowbrow falsification. If you really want to know about the diffrent types of governments, don't watch youtube videos, read books about it. I can recommend some to get you started.
Pandamanrr 3 years ago
Democracy is mob rule, Pandamanrr. That means if I raised a bigger mob than my neighbor, and we all voted to rape his wife, murder his children, steal all of his possessions, and leave him buried up to his neck in shit, and then do the same, or anything else that pleased us to any of his other neighbors, until we either run out of neighbors, or run into a bigger or stronger mob of voters, then there is nothing preventing us from doing as we please. You call that a "righteous" government?
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
You are wrong again, really I won't bother argueing with you. It's not my job to make sure you know the right definitions of certain words. If you want to debate you should atleast be well-informed, and I can tell that you're not.
Pandamanrr 3 years ago
You claim I am wrong, yet you offer not one single valid refutation of the obvious point of the argument. That is what we call a fundamental definition of the word, "cop-out" Pandamanrr.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
Okay I'll tell you why you're wrong. Which you would have known IF YOU HAD READ MY ORIGINAL POST.
"A democracy is still a democracy even if it has laws that protects the rights of the people"
Open a dictionary, look up the correct definitions.
Pandamanrr 3 years ago
Oh yes, Pandamanrr. ~I responded to your post without reading it first.~
Don't be absurd.
Here is a simple definition for you:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb, voting on what's for dinner.
mylongcylinder 3 years ago
A Democracy is A Democracy A Republic is A Republic! If you can't under stand the dictionary! Check to see how much Flouride is in your water supply you maybe having trubble with comprehending
lelandshane 3 years ago
Sorry grammar mistake!
juanCarlosvp7 3 years ago
Very Interesting. Does the president of USA knows this?
juanCarlosvp7 3 years ago
What?
ELoCo187um 3 years ago
great video...this is one to share with EVERYONE! five stars.
comixdiscomix 3 years ago
thank you for this vid, so true..
BSisFREEtruthCOSTS 3 years ago
we are heading for a theocracy.there is no left right just up down!!!
muckstar23 3 years ago
good words of wisdom
lelandshane 3 years ago
Great vid. Definitely a great starter to discussions!
I'm amazed at the people pissed off and equating anarchy with democracy. Democracy is a form of government. Anarchy is the absence of government. They cannot exist simultaneously. The difference is that in a pure democracy there are no rights for individuals - all rights reside with the whole. In an anarchy individuals are not given any rights - you have whatever rights you take - because there is no government to bestow those rights.
elioron 3 years ago
Example:
In a democracy if the majority wants something I have they can take it and there is not a damn thing I can do about it. In an anarchy I can shoot every last one that comes on my land until I run out of ammo because I don't want you to have it!
If I like your hat, I take it. If you complain and piss me off, I kill you. What is anyone going to do about it when there is no law to hold me accountable?
elioron 3 years ago
That's where the bloodshed comes in. With no law and no government people can, and historically will, do whatever they please with no regard for anyone else.
Pure democracy is a beautiful thing when everyone agrees. The fact is that doesn't happen much.
elioron 3 years ago
See? That state of no law is chaos, disorder, but not necessarily anarchy. Anarchy means no rule, not no law. Law is a set of principles and/or mores for a society. Rule is the goon squad that would post those laws, and kill you if you don't follow them.
Who makes the rules is something else entirely.
Please understand, I think that even the most well intentioned, happy community of poets type anarchy is as possible as balancing a pencil upright on a ball in the wind.
tobiasaurusrex 3 years ago
Our nation's founders made it clear that the government does not bestow rights, though. They are inalienable, bestowed by life itself. "Anarchy" means no rule, but there are two kinds. Chaotic-anarchy is really just chaos, and instantly becomes despotism, aka gang rule (/watch?v=-d9wmqO2Khw). Anarcho-communism is an ideal society of self rule with no government or leaders, but with willful cooperation and understanding of harmony. It's an unachievable society, a fantasy of pacifist genii.
tobiasaurusrex 3 years ago 3
history will repeat itself, no doubt, people will rise up to defend their rights and millions will die that is history, this thing its one way or the other is the problem, universal thinking is the solution where all of the planet will rule together, no more money equally spread the housing, food, health, this is the only way for all to live together, no money means no greed, no greed all needs met, we could then enter space and colonize other planets to bring in resources to earth.
freepress666 3 years ago
Generally, it's a great snip of film.
I really don't think you'll get too far convincing the world that Einstein was an idiot, though. However, a better argument against him would be that he refused to accept an expanding universe, even though it's now been taken as the state of things, and his own research was itself revealing such. He was still a most incredible person.
tobiasaurusrex 3 years ago
every school and every grade should be tought theese things.
my fourth grader is having moc elections and hearing propaganda mostly against mccain and for obama.
she is smart enough to understand this video for the most part.
we must teach our kids theese things or we will have no one else to blame.
HARMANHOUSE1 3 years ago
yes that was the Idea the founders had to. limit Big GOV. so the people would be free from dictatorship!
lelandshane 3 years ago
Having democrats and republicans splits the nation
silversobe 3 years ago
An evil Oligarchy afraid of the masses and needing living 'batteries' to power their 'matrix' simply creates the illusion of a democracy or republic to pacify the masses.
Psy0pAgent 3 years ago 4
Very good video.
chapmando2007 3 years ago
"Anarchy" is not fairly represented here. He's using chaos as anarchy as many have and do, but chaos is simply a state immediately before despotism. Anarchy as Noam Chomsky and Albert Einstein profess is also called anarcho-communism. It is a society of laws, morals, and integrated social life and peace. It is also known as Utopia, true anarchy, true communism, and due to human nature it is absolutely impossible. It requires that everyone in the society be fully enlightened and highly educatted.
tobiasaurusrex 3 years ago
nice comment nobody is perfect thats the best part of human nature inperfection like my spelling that u can still under stand even if its spelled wrong LOL
lelandshane 3 years ago
USA is already an oligarchy...people just don't want to admit it.
dnHooligan 3 years ago 6
I just learned a couple weeks ago about a Republic..
Thanks for the video...sharing it!
kellylynn9999 3 years ago
OKLAHOMA has JUST DECLARED its SOVEREIGNTY from present Federal Govt!
YEAHH!
To be in effect IMMEDIATELY!
At LAST!
Part of USA has stood up to their INTERFERING DAMAGING GOV who overstep ALL lines of the Constitution.
idasputem 3 years ago 4
Yahoo! oklahoma rocks! So much respect to them!Peace♥
imafishgod 3 years ago 2
that does it im moving back to Oklahoma
lelandshane 3 years ago
Truth! Nice find, Ida.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 51st Legislature (2008)
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 1089
By: Key
AS INTRODUCED
A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers; serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates; and directing distribution.
[and lots of legal technical stuff follows]
tobiasaurusrex 3 years ago
Thanks, there is HOPE! Plus there are MILLIONS more people than Govt goons!
idasputem 3 years ago
figures they rip anarchy. like we can't possibly behave on our own. govern-ment. to reign or rule over the mind.
mungcray 3 years ago
Anarchy is the only true form of democracy....
people can have anarchy and safety.
The brainwashed many don't see it that way...
Fear can persuade many at one stroke.
And just for the record, the people wanted Washington as a king and he declined. He didn't even want to be president. I guess being a slave owner was enough power for him.
tamelarry 3 years ago 3
As John Zerzan points out, Humanity has existed on this earth for around 100,000 years. It's has Civilization for only 10,000 years. So for 90,000 years, people got by perfectly ok without civilization.
And we didn't have all these fuck-awful commercials everywhere either...
Kiddolinfen 3 years ago 4
Excellent, good on you! Is Amercanism a word?
thegirl44 3 years ago
Sure, why not? It is an 'ism' after all. Maybe even Americanism is an Americanism - like John Connor gave birth to the Terminator gave birth to John Connor.... a circlism.
(cycle)
Kiddolinfen 3 years ago