another use is to make copper carbonate to make copper oxide then using that copper oxide to make thermite out of alluminum to blow your fucking self up
@mullymul1 Ya i saw this video on my homepage on the recommended section i was sure she was gonna say its also a cure for cancer but there are also many many other cures.....
Great it really works!! I buy baking soda at iherbs.com, Its the best price and cheap shipping, also if you use the discount code daj756 you will get $5 off on your first order :)
It's what happens when a neodarwinist atheist proficient at slurring about other people's 'ignorance, lack of education & tinfoil hattedness' when they question the rhapsodic assurances about science's utter godliness is requested to provide specific information: suddenly there's nothing but eery science.
So, we'll see if eventually weiming will manage to cite the original paper confirming successful isolation of HIV.
The original paper was all the way in 1983! How am I supposed to get that? Also, even if HIV don't exist, it still doesn't prove that the entire germ theory was wrong. Also, I am not a neodarwinist, and it is usually fundamentalists that calls anyone that.
'The original paper was all the way in 1983! How am I supposed to get that?'
So, it is impossible for you to simply provide the name of the paper first describing successful isolation of HIV, even though apparently, you've tried.
We must conclude that your beliefs are utterly baseless and that you are not in a position to process anything by yourself.
An individual with some actual scientific literacy and basic intellectual standards would never have settled...
HIV not existing does not mean germs don't cause diseases and "toxins, bad guys and witches" do. You call me as a quasi-religious believer of the government, yet all you did was ad hominem on both me and Pasteur, conspiracy theories and demanding evidence on why the germ theory works. You are totally and utterly a troll, an idiot, and an ignorant germ-theory denier. Why don't you stop following the "Big Naturo" and question them instead?
As I said before, provide evidence, or stop the conspiracy theories. Isn't your pointless, ad hominem denial baseless as well? An intellectual individual would have provided evidence long before this. You call my posts on explaining "how medicine works" just following the government, yet I see no different in you; you blindly follow naturopathy, baking soda cures, etc. Deny them and there will be no arguments.
@weiming1998 urgh, another low-IQ moron who has the illusion they are "intellectual"! btw, it seems you don't even know what "conspiracy theory" means!!
Also, it looks like you are the low IQ moron here. Isn't this guy (suddenlyitsobvious) writing
conspiracy theories in his comments? "The government" is hiding this miraculous cure from us! The big pharma is hiding this from us! This is no doubt conspiracy theories. Also, have you noticed that he provided zero evidence for his stance? What he did all that time was ad hominem attacks, conspiracy theories and demanding evidence.
An intelligent individual, would have wondered WHY I asked for the name of the original paper and, after trying to find it unsuccessfully, would ask HIMSELF some questions.
Truly tragic you simply accept you can't even find such a paper and then keep whining about 'evidence' when the only one here who has just PROVED he's a believer who's completely regardless for even the most basic evidence where his own beliefs are concerned is you...
OR you could instantly spray cold water on your burn for two minutes instead of letting the burn hurt like hell while you go and get some ice and baking soda.
Stressed out people dont poop like they should and they start feeling sick from their own feces ,thats when it time for a little soda in a glass of water ,15 minutes later your calling the plumber ,it works every time!
I believe that it would be best to use the products for its purposes not the baking soda. For example, the meat tenderizer - I disagree with. Use the products suitable for the edibles. Do not put it in your mouth or on food.
aluminum free baking soda will raise ur bloods pH to 7.4 pH now ur immune system is working the way God made you. buy pH testing tape online to check ur pH, if u have a disease like cancer ur pH is 4.5 to 5.5 pH very acidic. good health is above 7.0 pH poor health is below 7.0.
make alkaline water 1 gallon of tap water add 3 tablespoons baking soda. if u have pets give them alkaline water it will improve there health as well.
@22y32g9 raising ur pH helps detox ur entire body. adding more oxygen to ur body, disease can not live in an alkaline state. blood has a pos charge inside, and neg charge on the outside that helps blood to flow without sticking together.as ur pH goes below 7.0 blood loses it's neg charge and starts to stick together and cause blood clots. lemons, limes, apple cider vinegar will also raise ur bloods pH 97% of all heart attacks and strokes are preventable. i have u tube videos to back this up
@jsmythib People are stuck in a system of Medical doctors and pharmaceutical drugs!! Its all LIES!!! Heal your body with Plant based living nutrition!! and Natural cures!
You can put a few drops of bicarb-water solution in in your dog's ears when they smell. In fact, it seems you can pretty much use it to solve ANYTHING.
The more you find out about natural means of staying healthy, the more the med profession seems indeed outrageously criminal. The basis of modern medicine is the germ theory of disease, a completely demonic concoction defining all aspects of 'healthcare' today.
@suddenlyitsobvious Thanks for the tip for doggy ears. Also check out "colloidal silver" for infections related to virus, fungus, bacteria. It's awesome and cheap, works so quick. it's not a preventative though, only take it when you have an infection. Lots of vids on youtube showing how to make it etc.
I use bicarb for EVERYTHING now. I put it in my shoes, use it as deodorant, brush my teeth with it, rub it on my body, rub it on my dog when his skin is itchy, put it in his ears, drink it...It's obviously GREAT stuff, and I don't really understand the mechanism but it seems to eliminate all the bad 'germs' without elimating any of the good germs.
I don't know about colloidal silver. There's a guy on youtube who looks healthy enough but actually has a BLUE SKIN, which...
...developed progressively, so progressively that he didn't notice it, because he took perhaps big amounts of colloidal silver.
Intuitively, bicarb to me seems harmless and beneficial. Colloidal silver, I don't know. I've heard it's good, but it's a metal and I'm careful with these things...
@suddenlyitsobvious It's to treat infections like I said. Do you take anitbiotics everyday or just when you have an infection? Anything taken incorrectly can kill you including water okay.
I never take antibiotics and yes, I understand overdoing things is bad. Still, after seeing the entire skin of the guy has turned blue/purple PERMANENTLY, I'm a bit worried about the colloidal silver.
@suddenlyitsobvious you're an idiot, ever heard of alcohol poisoning? too much of anything isn't good. excuse me for trying to help your dumb ass. Colloidal silver has been used for thousands of years. Penicillin didn't come along unitl 1040's.
'you're an idiot. sorry I tried to give you useful info--my fucking bad!'
Listen, I was under the impression I was talking to a young, naive girl, so I took some trouble to stay nice and answer your posts that bored me silly from the start.
Most people here are equipped to use the internet and I doubt many will be interested in your housewife-tips that are limited to your reiterations that you like colloidal silver. WHO FUCKING CARES?
I don't need any help, certainly not from neurotic peanut-size brained housewives. You're blocked because I try to keep my mailbox clean from spam and disturbed trash.
@suddenlyitsobvious i make C S since 2005, i haven't turned blue yet. i use only distilled water and 2 bars of pure .9999 pure silver along with 3-9 volt battery's and i made a set of jumper cables out of alligator clips and speaker wire there about 12'' long, your looking for a light color of amber this is about 5 ppm. if it turns blue or muddy throw it out. I use it in my eyes and spray my sinuses, 2 months ago i had bronchitis i sprayed my lungs 20 or more times a day, 4 days later i was fine
@suddenlyitsobvious They haven't been able to cough up more than 3 or 4 cases of blue-coloring of the skin from Silver, and these are due to too big particles that gets stuck in the tissue like tattoo pigment. It is known from some silver mining, but is rare, and not dangerous.
Yes, I know, but since I keep getting mail about the issue of colloidal silver, that doesn't really interest me at all, here is my conclusive statement about why I wouldn't take it;
CS could very well be beneficial, but I have no way of knowing this other than basing myself on reports from others, meaning I'd have to BELIEVE.
While my own tastebuds inform me about the ingestion of bicarb & my body's use for it, CS is tasteless, it's production an unnatural process, and the fact...
...that it cumulates in the skin cells -which to me suggest that the body could be trying to get rid of it but the particles cannot for some reason be secreted through sweating, all of these things about CS I DON'T like.
I'll grant you that cases of people turning blue are rare and probably require ingesting large amounts.
@suddenlyitsobvious Oh, but if the particles are so big they get stuck - it is not colloidal silver, when colloidal the particles are very very small and passes through.
The process is not that unnatural, electricity is fundamental in everything - it's more that one finds a way to speed up a process.
The body needs silver just as any other trace mineral, it helps regeneration and it kills "bad stuff" - but has not been shown as toxic to the body or it's beneficent "helpers".
Yeah, the body probably needs silver and other trace minerals, but ideally finds these elements through the process of nutrition, which presents these elements in a form we know can be assimilated by the body.
The process of fabricating CS may present the silver in another fashion. Perhaps it does, or perhaps it doesn't. How to know?
I take it from your post you DO agree the body is trying to SECRETE the silver, meaning getting rid of it?
@suddenlyitsobvious "I take it from your post you DO agree the body is trying to SECRETE the silver, meaning getting rid of it?"
If it binds to germs it will perhaps be transported out with the trash, some metals like Mercury tend to be reabsorbed in the guts if it is not bound to something else like Selenium or Sulfur, in colloidal form I would think Silver do the same.
And, yes, around 80% of the soil in USA are now considered depleted, real "organic" food might be better.
Silver is not required by the body. Just use Google and you will find out. Also, why do alt medicine supporters always goes on about "bad stuff" or "toxins"? It's a very unscientific way of looking at diseases.
@weiming1998 What stem cells. What keeping an environment germ free and better able to regenerate.
Do you really have to ask why some are concerned by toxins ("bad stuff")?
If a body is too preoccupied with fighting battles against "ill-doers" it will be less able to do other things, it will affect people mentally, which again affects levels of transmitter substances and hormones and whatever have you - this again leads to a lot of things. You actually have to ask?
Yes, the body fights against bacteria and virus every day. But it does not "fight" toxins, like lead salts or mercury salts. It is partially excreted out of the body. It is the remaining toxins that causes the diseases. Also, the liver oxidizes toxins to harmless substances. When the liver is in the action of oxidizing the toxins, a part of the brain controls the liver, but that part of the brain is not the part that deals with mental fiunctioning, so it doesn't affect you mentally.
@suddenlyitsobvious People are stuck in a system of Medical doctors and pharmaceutical drugs!! Its all LIES!!! Heal your body with Plant based living nutrition!! and Natural cures!
You don't believe germs causes diseases, but "magical spirits" do? Also natural is not healthy. The Botulism toxin, the world's deadliest poison, comes from nature.
No, I'm saying that the promotion of the germ theory of disease was quite noticeably surrounded by fraud and 'bad science', which as always, is particularly evident in the era this dogma was created. This should suffice to reject it or at least reassess it VERY scrupulously, rather than simply opposing it to a substandard hypothetical alternative, or face the uncertainty of not having an alternative at all.
...interesting alternative, namely that cause and effect have been REVERSED, and that bacteria witnessed in diseased tissue are actually the RESULT of disease, bacteria changing form and multiplying to adapt to their new -DISEASED- environment.
I am not too interested in exploring this alternative that I'm merely providing as a bonus, since step number one in the analysis of this issue is debunking Pasteur's fraudulent 'science' -which is easy to anyone willing to...
If this is what you think, then tell me, why do people that has an unclean wound get infections? And why don't you ever get an infection if you put on "Big Pharma's" antibiotics? And why do syringes with traces of HIV virus cause HIV, but if you sterilize the syringe, it doesn't cause HIV? Also, if you think Pasteur is a fraud, you think hundreds of years of medical science is a fraud and a couple of snake oil salesmen were right.
Why don't you tell me if you think this supposed virus exists in what scientific publication its isolation was first described? Why, if the virus was isolated do serological HIV analyses rely on a combination of TWO tests, Western Blot + Elisa, neither of which is actually SPECIFIC to a supposed Hiv-virus, its presence being INFERRED through floating protocols?
'medical science a fraud'
It should be pretty obvious to see that the AMAZING INCIDENCE of...
The HIV virus was actually SEEN through an electron microscope, and you have the nerves to deny its existence? Also, If the HIV virus doesn't cause AIDs, then what does? Homosexual acts?
...disease today in the West -even as we're having access to food and are not undernourished and kept like slaves as in times past- shows the medical establishment has an interest in medicalizing people, NOT keeping them healthy.
Any medical professional simply goes by authority, just like you, they have neither the time nor the means to question authoritative dogma, they have INVESTMENTS of all kinds in not questioning a system they were conditioned & educated into.
I question things, but I don't flatly DENY things in when faced with a mountain of evidence. Also, why don't you learn to question naturopathy/curing of cancer with baking soda? Also, disease rates are falling ever so low. Humans used to live to 40-50 years on average, in the 1800s. But now this is increased to 70-80 because of modern medicine! Diseases like smallpox has practically being wiped out because of vaccines. How do you explain that?
'don't flatly DENY things in when faced with a mountain of evidence.'
The problem here is that while pointing at the mountain, one often overlooks, doesn't even bother to look into the specifics.
'Also, disease rates are falling ever so low. Humans used to live to 40-50 years on average, in the 1800s. But now this is increased to 70-80 because of modern medicine'
I'm surprised that you are actually making this observation when I actually ANTICIPATED you were...
It's easy to procure lists of questions which constantly puts the burden of intellectual activity on MY shoulders, which isn't a tragedy, but if no question is worked up to its ultimate consequences I don't see much point.
I think it would be fair at this stage that you first put up a A SPECIFIC answer to the two SPECIFIC questions about HIV I forwarded TWICE to you...
The burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders because There is aready ample evidence for the germ theory. If you want it refuted, you have to provide evidence. Also, this theory's up for hundreds of years, and you're not even a scientist, so the burden of proof is certainly on you.
...going to say this (neodarwinist atheists always use this line when exalting the wonders of modern medicine) with the following words in my last post that apparently, you skimmed through in a rush:
'Science isn't curing people and those who claim it does always need to compare to centuries past when people were starving to death in a feudal system or worked to death in toxic factories....
Bashing me "cause" I'm an atheist, huh? Also, how do you explain the eradication of small pox? What about Polio, which only resurged when idiot fundamentalists like you refused to vaccinate. What about the eradication of countless diseases, all thanks to vaccine?
'THAT's the 'golden standard' allowing the claim -heard ALL the time- that 'we live so much longer now'.
I find it abnormal that you would compare our lifespans to those of people living 200 years ago, when kids were worked to death in factories, people were stashed together like cattle in insalubrious, hygienically unsound conditions without sufficient nourishment and then claim:
As I said before, not everyone were like that. There were rich merchants, nobles, people that lived in relative comfort and healthiness. But still they had very short lifespan. Why?
...with basic historical FACTS, or you simply don't care at all because the only priority is adoring the idol and staying in line with authority, whatever distortion is necessary to accomplish this. It's WILLFUL thinking, exactly like science promotes.
You state:
'Now, it is you that is totally ignorant of biochemistry, which is how medicine works. The pain-killers are not poison, they inhibit nerves that sends electrochemical signals of pain to the brain.'
I am not staying in line with authority, it is you that is rambling, purely from ignorance, when you don't even understand a bit of biology or chemistry.
Admit you've never checked the list of adverse affects of paracetamol.
'Antibiotics are not toxins'
You do realize that the very word is a composite of 'anti and 'bio'.
I don't care about 'naturopathy' and repeat that I'm not an adept of some cult or fringe subculture. What is certain is that naturopathy's products and procedures can by no stretch of the imagination be conceived to be as crudely toxic and invasive as allopathic practice.
Every medicine has a side effect. Even natural ones. The side effects are not always very harmful though. All your ridiculous claims about medicine without side effects are false. If medicines don't have side effects, then it has no effect at all.
...toxicity is translated into actual, demonstrable pathogenesis but isn't it obvious that its hepatotoxicity and association with blood cancer are SIGNIFICANT.
Furthermore, the very supposedly beneficial mechanism of ingesting active synthetic substances to relieve pains merely leads to countless other damaging chain-effects.
Have you ever looked at the statistics of people addicted to painkillers and taken a good look at their vibe, their energy levels? They're...
Your line of reasoning completely relies on the 'argument from authority'. What you have failed to consider, is whether authority really does have your best interests at heart.
Have you never considered how significant it is that medical science is PROFIT-BASED, owned and commissioned by multinationals? Why don't you google up entire lists of medications revoked from the markets because insanely toxic?
Mind you, these are only the ones that didn't make it: ALL PILLS..
Now, it is you that is totally ignorant of biochemistry, which is how medicine works. The pain-killers are not poison, they inhibit nerves that sends electrochemical signals of pain to the brain. Antibiotics are not toxins, they are agents that are extremely harmful to bacteria because of their metabolism, but are harmless to humans. Also, did you know that naturopathy and other assorted snake oil makes a THIRD of what the "big pharma" makes a year? Question that...
...are basically poison, and its hallucinating to simply read an inclosed leaflet from any medication and check the 'side-effects' section.
WHERE ARE RESULTS?
Science isn't curing people and those who claim it does always need to compare to centuries past when people were starving to death in a feudal system or worked to death in toxic factories. THAT's the 'golden standard' allowing the claim -heard ALL the time- that 'we live so much longer now'.
@suddenlyitsobvious Sure, there were slaves, but even the ROYALTY didn't live as long as a today's poorest beggar. You claim that medicine is a poison, well, what medical theories do you believe in then?
'even the ROYALTY didn't live as long as a today's poorest beggar'
There are reasons and circumstances for that involving a broader spectrum of issues we need not get into here, but suffice it so say that royalty since for centuries been DEGENERATE -physically and morally- and rampant incest and cross-breeding contributed to poor health.
If you think royalties are unhealthy, what about nobles? What about rich merchants? They lived WAY shorter lives than almost everyone in the 21st century. Explain that.
@suddenlyitsobvious What is a bit strange with the Pasteur process (as so many others) is that there are secondary effects not "admitted".
It's like, people believe that when Chlorine is used the "bad stuff" magically disappears; but it does not, new compounds are made and they are harmful.
With Pasteurisation you get a lot of fragments and organic solutions (DNA etc.) floating around in the liquid from the "blown up" germs.
You obviously don't know the make up of bacteria, do you? a bacteria is mainly made of proteins and DNA. The proteins gets broken down by the body into amino acids, which breaks down into glucose and other harmless compounds. The DNA is broken down similarly also. The bacteria is dead, so it cannot protect itself against decomposition. Also, if chlorine can form compounds with proteins, DNA, etc, then it would be carcinogenic, but it's not, especially not in such low concentration.
The basis of this medicalizing dynamic that has today become quite insane is of course Pasteur's germ theory of disease. We need poison pills to protect us from evil bacteria and viruses that are constantly seeking to ATTACK us!! We need to DESTROY the pathogens with poison and never mind if our healthy cells are destroyed in the process.
In fact, it shows how utterly primitive and psychotic our medical culture is...
I have never seen a person as ignorant of science as you. The pills are not poison, they affect the entire human system on a MOLECULAR level. It is biochemistry, and even if I posted complex details on how medicine works, you won't understand and will continue to deny. Forget it, humans HAS NO SOULS! NO VITAL FORCES ARE AT WORK! we are all just a giant complex machine, and medicine inhibits or fixes certain signals givcen out by the body for pain relief.
Other medicines kills bacteria, which is excreting the real toxins, and gobbling up cells at the same time. They are not evil; they do that for survival. Still others repairs inhibited, malfunctioning or broken parts of the body.The inhibition of the body's immune system is sometimes essential for human survival, as it can sometimes kill you. Vaccines lets the body develop an immunity to a certain type of virus. Don't deny this, deny your questionable, naturopathic snake oil
The reason most people don't know Pasteur was a complete fraud, plagiarist, liar is that they're typically way too busy tipping their hats at all the big names while emptying themselves of all thought. They're too lazy to actually CHECK Pasteur's career and theories that only made it because PROMOTED by the establishment who realized -unlike you- what money, power, control would be derived from this awful theory that you obviously simply BELIEVE like any..
Yes, I BELIEVE, but not because I'm brainwashed by "big pharma", but there is simply, too much evidence for germ theory of diseases. Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur is a plagiarist, the only thing that matters is that his theory on how bacteria/virus causes diseases were right, and hundreds of years of medical science confirms it. No snake oil is going to overturn the hundreds of years of research by hundreds and thousands of scientists.
Regardless of other available options and even when none can be procured at the flip of a hat, a sound scientific approach to all things involves the willingness to ALWAYS privelege truth, to analyze critically and honestly, and to only accept a theory as fact when the most rigid formal standards have been complied with.
The germ theory of disease does not meet the basic standards, nor does the hiv/aids dogma, regardless of alternatives.
...christian bigot accepts the immaculate conception. This is quite understandable, mind you, it is a dogma in society. Some people are willing to actually do some homework and CHECK such dogma's, while the mass conformist simply isn't interested,, so I won't try to 'convince' you.
Pästeur's name today is held in very high regard, sort of like Freud's or any other influential prominent of the past. Yet the amazing scientific misconduct of both is perfectly well...
It is not I that conform. it is you that denies and denies just because you listened to some naturopathic patients rambling about their dubious anecdotes. Also, I am not a Christian; I have no religion. Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur's prototype of the germ theory is flawed; medical science has since fixed it up, just like psychology has fixed up Freud's theories.
'because you listened to some naturopathic patients '
It is quite logical that you should 'think' this because you are a believer, meaning INDEED a religious person, whose religion is scientism, a religion you can only defend by CONSTANTLY appealing to authority and the majority and the OVERWHELMING evidence of it all, without ever being able to move beyond such rhapsodic slogans and actually explore any issue by YOURSELF -as I do, because contrary to what you...
...are constantly intimating, I am NOT a believer, nor a religious individual.
The following reasoning of yours:
'Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur's prototype of the germ theory is flawed; medical science has since fixed it up, just like psychology has fixed up Freud's theories.'
is extremely typical of your faith, and invalidates from the start any hope of a reasonable exchange for the following reason:
you are NOT willing to explore the basis of ANY scientific..
...dogma EVEN when it can be shown that it was pushed onto the collective in a 'VERY UNSCIENTIFIC' fashion.
This is of course very sloppy thinking, and you subsequently reassure yourself that since everybody else has basically done the same thing you are doing and the flawed dogma has as a result been MADE TO COME true using ANY means, ANY kind of useful evidence while ignoring all evidence to the contrary, that there can be no doubt today that it was true all along.
After all this time, I have never seen you present ONE evidence of why the germ theory don't work, only flaming Pasteur's theories and Pasteur himself and going on about some stupid conspiracy theory that medicine is evil and "Big Pharma" is behind this.
So, we cannot explore the basis of the theory, all subsequent 'evidence' needs not be explored either because we already know it's true.
To willfully ignore a flawed basis and hope that what's been edified on it is solid anyway is indeed a religious mindframe that would be completely unworkable in the less faith-based sciences and area's, such as engineering. No architect could go by such a blind faith and hope to sell a house with a rotten foundation while keeping a..
Exploring the basis of a flawed theory, which has been fixed up long since, and using the flawed version of the theory as evidence that the entire theory don't work is akin to thinking "Newton didn't consider the bending of spacetime and quantum gravity, so the theory of gravity is obviously untrue."
Easy, just google "HIV virus isolated and read the first few articles. If you don't cherry-pick alt-medicine sites claiming garbage, then it should be pretty easy.
'Easy, just google "HIV virus isolated and read the first few articles. If you don't cherry-pick alt-medicine sites claiming garbage, then it should be pretty easy.'
This is no answer to my utterly straightforward question that I now send you for a THIRD time:
please cite the publication first confirming the successful isolation of HIV.
...to answer, since in your mind there can be no doubt about the existence of this virus and surely there must exist a paper that first published the isolation of it? Hmm?
My other question is also worth repeating:
' Why, if the virus was isolated do serological HIV analyses rely on a combination of TWO tests, Western Blot + Elisa, neither of which is actually SPECIFIC to a supposed Hiv-virus, its presence being INFERRED through floating protocols?'
Because making a SPECIFIC test to detect a type of virus might look easy to you, but actually it is extremely difficult. The two tests are probably like this; one covers a potential metabolism product / a gene, the other covers exceptions; different metabolism products and sometimes a variation in the gene.
'The two tests are probably like this; one covers a potential metabolism product / a gene, the other covers exceptions; different metabolism products & sometimes a variation in the gene.'
Who cares about 'probably'?
'It is extremely difficult'
Oh my, sorry for being so frivolously naive, professor!
Are you really suggesting it's logical that a virus-specific test has NOT been developed?
Wouldn't you say ANYTHING & EVERYTHING is logical provided it's the way authority does things?
OF COURSE NOT! The government/authority has banned glassware and chemicals. Of course I don't agree with that. Also, Stop using ad hominem and just provide some EVIDENCE, ok? And as I said before, specific tests are very difficult to develop because even the same virus has gene variations, but it wouldn't matter to you; you are totally ignorant of medical science and biochemistry.
...documented and accessible for anyone willing to base their assessments on REALITY, on FACTS, rather than on paradigmatical mantra's that are well-known to be blatant deceptions by insiders and those with a minimum of curiosity and literacy...
Baking Soda is also the BEST & most efficaious (effective) facial scrub / exfoliate.
Simply moisten face with water, lather with a little facial wash & then VERY, VERY gently apply about 1 teaspoon of BAKING SODA & massage in very gentle circular movements. Your face will feel like a baby's smooth bottom!
Soak smelly feet in a strong Bicarb & warm water solution regularly to kill the smell-causing bacterial / fungal culprits too.
Heartburn/acid reflux? Drink a glass of water + 1tsp Bicarb!
You can also use baking soda mixed with a little water on your hair to get rid of the build up of styling products. Pour it on your hair and massage for about a minute, rinse and shampoo. Your hair will feel very clean and soft.
is Natrium Bicarbonate same as sodium bicarbonate?
887969656 5 days ago
CANCER CURE.It will change your PH just like that there plants tooooo!
moomman89 1 week ago
another use is to make copper carbonate to make copper oxide then using that copper oxide to make thermite out of alluminum to blow your fucking self up
diegonikki 1 week ago
how about cancer cure, google it
mullymul1 1 week ago
@mullymul1 Ya i saw this video on my homepage on the recommended section i was sure she was gonna say its also a cure for cancer but there are also many many other cures.....
TECpeds94 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great it really works!! I buy baking soda at iherbs.com, Its the best price and cheap shipping, also if you use the discount code daj756 you will get $5 off on your first order :)
dajamo39 3 weeks ago
annoying music
MadSmokerBBQ 1 month ago
DISLIKE - AT 1:00, she clearly drinks normal water!
rlmorgan95 1 month ago
*Oops, a 'Freudian slip'? EERY SILENCE of course, NOT eery science...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
Tick tock...
Guess I'd better not hold my breath.
It's what happens when a neodarwinist atheist proficient at slurring about other people's 'ignorance, lack of education & tinfoil hattedness' when they question the rhapsodic assurances about science's utter godliness is requested to provide specific information: suddenly there's nothing but eery science.
So, we'll see if eventually weiming will manage to cite the original paper confirming successful isolation of HIV.
Tick..tick...
He he he...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
The original paper was all the way in 1983! How am I supposed to get that? Also, even if HIV don't exist, it still doesn't prove that the entire germ theory was wrong. Also, I am not a neodarwinist, and it is usually fundamentalists that calls anyone that.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'The original paper was all the way in 1983! How am I supposed to get that?'
So, it is impossible for you to simply provide the name of the paper first describing successful isolation of HIV, even though apparently, you've tried.
We must conclude that your beliefs are utterly baseless and that you are not in a position to process anything by yourself.
An individual with some actual scientific literacy and basic intellectual standards would never have settled...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
HIV not existing does not mean germs don't cause diseases and "toxins, bad guys and witches" do. You call me as a quasi-religious believer of the government, yet all you did was ad hominem on both me and Pasteur, conspiracy theories and demanding evidence on why the germ theory works. You are totally and utterly a troll, an idiot, and an ignorant germ-theory denier. Why don't you stop following the "Big Naturo" and question them instead?
weiming1998 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
As I said before, provide evidence, or stop the conspiracy theories. Isn't your pointless, ad hominem denial baseless as well? An intellectual individual would have provided evidence long before this. You call my posts on explaining "how medicine works" just following the government, yet I see no different in you; you blindly follow naturopathy, baking soda cures, etc. Deny them and there will be no arguments.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998 urgh, another low-IQ moron who has the illusion they are "intellectual"! btw, it seems you don't even know what "conspiracy theory" means!!
tosan1 2 weeks ago
@tosan1
[citation needed}
weiming1998 2 weeks ago
@tosan1
Also, it looks like you are the low IQ moron here. Isn't this guy (suddenlyitsobvious) writing
conspiracy theories in his comments? "The government" is hiding this miraculous cure from us! The big pharma is hiding this from us! This is no doubt conspiracy theories. Also, have you noticed that he provided zero evidence for his stance? What he did all that time was ad hominem attacks, conspiracy theories and demanding evidence.
weiming1998 2 weeks ago
@weiming1998
...for such a cop out answer.
An intelligent individual, would have wondered WHY I asked for the name of the original paper and, after trying to find it unsuccessfully, would ask HIMSELF some questions.
Truly tragic you simply accept you can't even find such a paper and then keep whining about 'evidence' when the only one here who has just PROVED he's a believer who's completely regardless for even the most basic evidence where his own beliefs are concerned is you...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Damn it, I already PROVIDED some evidence for germ theory. Look at the posts that I've posted before.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
So, it's quite clear this is going nowhere so I now have to say goodbye!
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Ok, troll.
weiming1998 1 month ago
OR you could instantly spray cold water on your burn for two minutes instead of letting the burn hurt like hell while you go and get some ice and baking soda.
lisstina90 1 month ago
Stressed out people dont poop like they should and they start feeling sick from their own feces ,thats when it time for a little soda in a glass of water ,15 minutes later your calling the plumber ,it works every time!
FrankaDith 1 month ago
I believe that it would be best to use the products for its purposes not the baking soda. For example, the meat tenderizer - I disagree with. Use the products suitable for the edibles. Do not put it in your mouth or on food.
eddyvideostar 1 month ago
@eddyvideostar why not? There are many recipes that use baking soda as an ingredient
AbuBishir 1 month ago
plus CURES the CANCER 100%
lgogo4 2 months ago 2
My meat will be so tender, it will melt in your mouth
hangover71 2 months ago
you can also make a tomato glow....check out the video on utube,well i am not promoting the video...just information
usefortouch 2 months ago
At first I thought #2 said bum treatment, and was like is there anything baking soda cant do...
royalblowno 2 months ago
aluminum free baking soda will raise ur bloods pH to 7.4 pH now ur immune system is working the way God made you. buy pH testing tape online to check ur pH, if u have a disease like cancer ur pH is 4.5 to 5.5 pH very acidic. good health is above 7.0 pH poor health is below 7.0.
make alkaline water 1 gallon of tap water add 3 tablespoons baking soda. if u have pets give them alkaline water it will improve there health as well.
22y32g9 2 months ago
@22y32g9 raising ur pH helps detox ur entire body. adding more oxygen to ur body, disease can not live in an alkaline state. blood has a pos charge inside, and neg charge on the outside that helps blood to flow without sticking together.as ur pH goes below 7.0 blood loses it's neg charge and starts to stick together and cause blood clots. lemons, limes, apple cider vinegar will also raise ur bloods pH 97% of all heart attacks and strokes are preventable. i have u tube videos to back this up
22y32g9 2 months ago 3
wow awesome
yazafara 2 months ago
lol i first read "2.burn treatment" as "bum treatment" xD !!
XcrazytomboychickX 2 months ago
if it could get rid of gang stalkers, life would be perfect.
SimplyAsunder 3 months ago
haha i thought it said 'bum treatment' not burn treatment when the words came up oops :)
daniellehalsall 3 months ago
im sure the fda will try and ban this to because its helpful and people have a clue about its benefits
FloridianAsshole22 3 months ago
"your meet will be so tender, it will melt in your mouth"
ZennLa13 4 months ago
I use baking soda to wash my hair so I no longer have to buy shampoo with all the crap in it and it is so much cheaper.
Cher987 4 months ago
If you where hotter you would get more views LoL................Still she's not bad:-)
420delisle 4 months ago
Baking soda should be stored right next to ductape.
jsmythib 4 months ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
@jsmythib People are stuck in a system of Medical doctors and pharmaceutical drugs!! Its all LIES!!! Heal your body with Plant based living nutrition!! and Natural cures!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
milf
XeEnjoi 4 months ago
wow , pretty lady.
tomcat624u 6 months ago
You can put a few drops of bicarb-water solution in in your dog's ears when they smell. In fact, it seems you can pretty much use it to solve ANYTHING.
The more you find out about natural means of staying healthy, the more the med profession seems indeed outrageously criminal. The basis of modern medicine is the germ theory of disease, a completely demonic concoction defining all aspects of 'healthcare' today.
suddenlyitsobvious 6 months ago 16
@suddenlyitsobvious Thanks for the tip for doggy ears. Also check out "colloidal silver" for infections related to virus, fungus, bacteria. It's awesome and cheap, works so quick. it's not a preventative though, only take it when you have an infection. Lots of vids on youtube showing how to make it etc.
goldengyrl2010 3 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
I use bicarb for EVERYTHING now. I put it in my shoes, use it as deodorant, brush my teeth with it, rub it on my body, rub it on my dog when his skin is itchy, put it in his ears, drink it...It's obviously GREAT stuff, and I don't really understand the mechanism but it seems to eliminate all the bad 'germs' without elimating any of the good germs.
I don't know about colloidal silver. There's a guy on youtube who looks healthy enough but actually has a BLUE SKIN, which...
suddenlyitsobvious 3 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
...developed progressively, so progressively that he didn't notice it, because he took perhaps big amounts of colloidal silver.
Intuitively, bicarb to me seems harmless and beneficial. Colloidal silver, I don't know. I've heard it's good, but it's a metal and I'm careful with these things...
suddenlyitsobvious 3 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious It's to treat infections like I said. Do you take anitbiotics everyday or just when you have an infection? Anything taken incorrectly can kill you including water okay.
goldengyrl2010 3 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
I never take antibiotics and yes, I understand overdoing things is bad. Still, after seeing the entire skin of the guy has turned blue/purple PERMANENTLY, I'm a bit worried about the colloidal silver.
suddenlyitsobvious 3 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious you're an idiot, ever heard of alcohol poisoning? too much of anything isn't good. excuse me for trying to help your dumb ass. Colloidal silver has been used for thousands of years. Penicillin didn't come along unitl 1040's.
goldengyrl2010 3 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
AND, you actually PMed this to me:
'you're an idiot. sorry I tried to give you useful info--my fucking bad!'
Listen, I was under the impression I was talking to a young, naive girl, so I took some trouble to stay nice and answer your posts that bored me silly from the start.
Most people here are equipped to use the internet and I doubt many will be interested in your housewife-tips that are limited to your reiterations that you like colloidal silver. WHO FUCKING CARES?
suddenlyitsobvious 3 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
So you've heard of penicillin and you can almost type in '1940's'...
Please don't try to 'help' me, you dullwitted, boring little housewife, especially since it turns out you're quite unbalanced.
suddenlyitsobvious 3 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious You can't be helped you stupid bitch!
goldengyrl2010 2 months ago
@goldengyrl2010
Helped by YOU? Bwa ha ha.
I don't need any help, certainly not from neurotic peanut-size brained housewives. You're blocked because I try to keep my mailbox clean from spam and disturbed trash.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious i make C S since 2005, i haven't turned blue yet. i use only distilled water and 2 bars of pure .9999 pure silver along with 3-9 volt battery's and i made a set of jumper cables out of alligator clips and speaker wire there about 12'' long, your looking for a light color of amber this is about 5 ppm. if it turns blue or muddy throw it out. I use it in my eyes and spray my sinuses, 2 months ago i had bronchitis i sprayed my lungs 20 or more times a day, 4 days later i was fine
22y32g9 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious They haven't been able to cough up more than 3 or 4 cases of blue-coloring of the skin from Silver, and these are due to too big particles that gets stuck in the tissue like tattoo pigment. It is known from some silver mining, but is rare, and not dangerous.
Kenzofeis 2 months ago
@Kenzofeis
Yes, I know, but since I keep getting mail about the issue of colloidal silver, that doesn't really interest me at all, here is my conclusive statement about why I wouldn't take it;
CS could very well be beneficial, but I have no way of knowing this other than basing myself on reports from others, meaning I'd have to BELIEVE.
While my own tastebuds inform me about the ingestion of bicarb & my body's use for it, CS is tasteless, it's production an unnatural process, and the fact...
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@Kenzofeis
...that it cumulates in the skin cells -which to me suggest that the body could be trying to get rid of it but the particles cannot for some reason be secreted through sweating, all of these things about CS I DON'T like.
I'll grant you that cases of people turning blue are rare and probably require ingesting large amounts.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious Oh, but if the particles are so big they get stuck - it is not colloidal silver, when colloidal the particles are very very small and passes through.
The process is not that unnatural, electricity is fundamental in everything - it's more that one finds a way to speed up a process.
The body needs silver just as any other trace mineral, it helps regeneration and it kills "bad stuff" - but has not been shown as toxic to the body or it's beneficent "helpers".
Kenzofeis 2 months ago
@Kenzofeis
Yeah, the body probably needs silver and other trace minerals, but ideally finds these elements through the process of nutrition, which presents these elements in a form we know can be assimilated by the body.
The process of fabricating CS may present the silver in another fashion. Perhaps it does, or perhaps it doesn't. How to know?
I take it from your post you DO agree the body is trying to SECRETE the silver, meaning getting rid of it?
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious "I take it from your post you DO agree the body is trying to SECRETE the silver, meaning getting rid of it?"
If it binds to germs it will perhaps be transported out with the trash, some metals like Mercury tend to be reabsorbed in the guts if it is not bound to something else like Selenium or Sulfur, in colloidal form I would think Silver do the same.
And, yes, around 80% of the soil in USA are now considered depleted, real "organic" food might be better.
Kenzofeis 2 months ago
@Kenzofeis
And yes, I know, food is nutrient depleted today, I'm aware of that and eat organic.
suddenlyitsobvious 2 months ago
@Kenzofeis
Silver is not required by the body. Just use Google and you will find out. Also, why do alt medicine supporters always goes on about "bad stuff" or "toxins"? It's a very unscientific way of looking at diseases.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998 What stem cells. What keeping an environment germ free and better able to regenerate.
Do you really have to ask why some are concerned by toxins ("bad stuff")?
If a body is too preoccupied with fighting battles against "ill-doers" it will be less able to do other things, it will affect people mentally, which again affects levels of transmitter substances and hormones and whatever have you - this again leads to a lot of things. You actually have to ask?
Kenzofeis 1 month ago
@Kenzofeis
Yes, the body fights against bacteria and virus every day. But it does not "fight" toxins, like lead salts or mercury salts. It is partially excreted out of the body. It is the remaining toxins that causes the diseases. Also, the liver oxidizes toxins to harmless substances. When the liver is in the action of oxidizing the toxins, a part of the brain controls the liver, but that part of the brain is not the part that deals with mental fiunctioning, so it doesn't affect you mentally.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
So, let's start at the basis:
are you denying that Pasteur's blatant scientific misconduct and corrupt scientific practice are demonstrable FACT?
If you want to exchange on this, let's get to specifics, rather than generalized claims and reassurances about science's achievements.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@suddenlyitsobvious People are stuck in a system of Medical doctors and pharmaceutical drugs!! Its all LIES!!! Heal your body with Plant based living nutrition!! and Natural cures!
5tonyvvvv 2 months ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
You don't believe germs causes diseases, but "magical spirits" do? Also natural is not healthy. The Botulism toxin, the world's deadliest poison, comes from nature.
weiming1998 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weiming1998
'but "magical spirits" do'
No, I'm saying that the promotion of the germ theory of disease was quite noticeably surrounded by fraud and 'bad science', which as always, is particularly evident in the era this dogma was created. This should suffice to reject it or at least reassess it VERY scrupulously, rather than simply opposing it to a substandard hypothetical alternative, or face the uncertainty of not having an alternative at all.
However, there actually IS an...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...interesting alternative, namely that cause and effect have been REVERSED, and that bacteria witnessed in diseased tissue are actually the RESULT of disease, bacteria changing form and multiplying to adapt to their new -DISEASED- environment.
I am not too interested in exploring this alternative that I'm merely providing as a bonus, since step number one in the analysis of this issue is debunking Pasteur's fraudulent 'science' -which is easy to anyone willing to...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
If this is what you think, then tell me, why do people that has an unclean wound get infections? And why don't you ever get an infection if you put on "Big Pharma's" antibiotics? And why do syringes with traces of HIV virus cause HIV, but if you sterilize the syringe, it doesn't cause HIV? Also, if you think Pasteur is a fraud, you think hundreds of years of medical science is a fraud and a couple of snake oil salesmen were right.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'Hiv virus'
Why don't you tell me if you think this supposed virus exists in what scientific publication its isolation was first described? Why, if the virus was isolated do serological HIV analyses rely on a combination of TWO tests, Western Blot + Elisa, neither of which is actually SPECIFIC to a supposed Hiv-virus, its presence being INFERRED through floating protocols?
'medical science a fraud'
It should be pretty obvious to see that the AMAZING INCIDENCE of...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
The HIV virus was actually SEEN through an electron microscope, and you have the nerves to deny its existence? Also, If the HIV virus doesn't cause AIDs, then what does? Homosexual acts?
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...disease today in the West -even as we're having access to food and are not undernourished and kept like slaves as in times past- shows the medical establishment has an interest in medicalizing people, NOT keeping them healthy.
Any medical professional simply goes by authority, just like you, they have neither the time nor the means to question authoritative dogma, they have INVESTMENTS of all kinds in not questioning a system they were conditioned & educated into.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
I question things, but I don't flatly DENY things in when faced with a mountain of evidence. Also, why don't you learn to question naturopathy/curing of cancer with baking soda? Also, disease rates are falling ever so low. Humans used to live to 40-50 years on average, in the 1800s. But now this is increased to 70-80 because of modern medicine! Diseases like smallpox has practically being wiped out because of vaccines. How do you explain that?
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'don't flatly DENY things in when faced with a mountain of evidence.'
The problem here is that while pointing at the mountain, one often overlooks, doesn't even bother to look into the specifics.
'Also, disease rates are falling ever so low. Humans used to live to 40-50 years on average, in the 1800s. But now this is increased to 70-80 because of modern medicine'
I'm surprised that you are actually making this observation when I actually ANTICIPATED you were...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
I'll actually list the evidence here:
1, Why don't people ever get infections if they used antibiotics on a wound?
2, Why do modern medicine almost always relieve a symtom or cure a disease?
3, Why do people get food poisoning?
4,Why is there epidemics of diseases in ultra-religious communities that refuse to vaccinate?
5,If medicine don't work, how come they are compatible with biochemical theories? Are those made-up as well.
There are more evidence, if you use Google.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
It's easy to procure lists of questions which constantly puts the burden of intellectual activity on MY shoulders, which isn't a tragedy, but if no question is worked up to its ultimate consequences I don't see much point.
I think it would be fair at this stage that you first put up a A SPECIFIC answer to the two SPECIFIC questions about HIV I forwarded TWICE to you...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
The burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders because There is aready ample evidence for the germ theory. If you want it refuted, you have to provide evidence. Also, this theory's up for hundreds of years, and you're not even a scientist, so the burden of proof is certainly on you.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...going to say this (neodarwinist atheists always use this line when exalting the wonders of modern medicine) with the following words in my last post that apparently, you skimmed through in a rush:
'Science isn't curing people and those who claim it does always need to compare to centuries past when people were starving to death in a feudal system or worked to death in toxic factories....
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Bashing me "cause" I'm an atheist, huh? Also, how do you explain the eradication of small pox? What about Polio, which only resurged when idiot fundamentalists like you refused to vaccinate. What about the eradication of countless diseases, all thanks to vaccine?
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...continued quote:
'THAT's the 'golden standard' allowing the claim -heard ALL the time- that 'we live so much longer now'.
I find it abnormal that you would compare our lifespans to those of people living 200 years ago, when kids were worked to death in factories, people were stashed together like cattle in insalubrious, hygienically unsound conditions without sufficient nourishment and then claim:
IT'S ALL THANKS TO SCIENCE!
Either you are not familiar...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
As I said before, not everyone were like that. There were rich merchants, nobles, people that lived in relative comfort and healthiness. But still they had very short lifespan. Why?
weiming1998 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weiming1998
...with basic historical FACTS, or you simply don't care at all because the only priority is adoring the idol and staying in line with authority, whatever distortion is necessary to accomplish this. It's WILLFUL thinking, exactly like science promotes.
You state:
'Now, it is you that is totally ignorant of biochemistry, which is how medicine works. The pain-killers are not poison, they inhibit nerves that sends electrochemical signals of pain to the brain.'
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
I am not staying in line with authority, it is you that is rambling, purely from ignorance, when you don't even understand a bit of biology or chemistry.
weiming1998 1 month ago
Comment removed
weiming1998 1 month ago
Comment removed
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
Admit you've never checked the list of adverse affects of paracetamol.
'Antibiotics are not toxins'
You do realize that the very word is a composite of 'anti and 'bio'.
I don't care about 'naturopathy' and repeat that I'm not an adept of some cult or fringe subculture. What is certain is that naturopathy's products and procedures can by no stretch of the imagination be conceived to be as crudely toxic and invasive as allopathic practice.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Every medicine has a side effect. Even natural ones. The side effects are not always very harmful though. All your ridiculous claims about medicine without side effects are false. If medicines don't have side effects, then it has no effect at all.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'Every medicine has a side effect. Even natural ones'
Why are you constantly opposing allopathy to naturopathy?
YOU STATED:
'The pain-killers are not poison, they inhibit nerves that sends electrochemical signals of pain to the brain'
I told you to check the list of adverse affects of paracetamol, a major active ingredient in painkillers. It IS toxic.
Of course, we can then have a debate about what 'toxicity' really means, that a certain dosis is required before...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...toxicity is translated into actual, demonstrable pathogenesis but isn't it obvious that its hepatotoxicity and association with blood cancer are SIGNIFICANT.
Furthermore, the very supposedly beneficial mechanism of ingesting active synthetic substances to relieve pains merely leads to countless other damaging chain-effects.
Have you ever looked at the statistics of people addicted to painkillers and taken a good look at their vibe, their energy levels? They're...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...completely messed up, it interferes with the entire organism in a manner that is ZOMBIFYING.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'All your ridiculous claims about medicine without side effects are false.'
I have no idea what you're talking about. I didn't make such claims. You must be confusing me with someone else.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
Your line of reasoning completely relies on the 'argument from authority'. What you have failed to consider, is whether authority really does have your best interests at heart.
Have you never considered how significant it is that medical science is PROFIT-BASED, owned and commissioned by multinationals? Why don't you google up entire lists of medications revoked from the markets because insanely toxic?
Mind you, these are only the ones that didn't make it: ALL PILLS..
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Now, it is you that is totally ignorant of biochemistry, which is how medicine works. The pain-killers are not poison, they inhibit nerves that sends electrochemical signals of pain to the brain. Antibiotics are not toxins, they are agents that are extremely harmful to bacteria because of their metabolism, but are harmless to humans. Also, did you know that naturopathy and other assorted snake oil makes a THIRD of what the "big pharma" makes a year? Question that...
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...are basically poison, and its hallucinating to simply read an inclosed leaflet from any medication and check the 'side-effects' section.
WHERE ARE RESULTS?
Science isn't curing people and those who claim it does always need to compare to centuries past when people were starving to death in a feudal system or worked to death in toxic factories. THAT's the 'golden standard' allowing the claim -heard ALL the time- that 'we live so much longer now'.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious Sure, there were slaves, but even the ROYALTY didn't live as long as a today's poorest beggar. You claim that medicine is a poison, well, what medical theories do you believe in then?
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'even the ROYALTY didn't live as long as a today's poorest beggar'
There are reasons and circumstances for that involving a broader spectrum of issues we need not get into here, but suffice it so say that royalty since for centuries been DEGENERATE -physically and morally- and rampant incest and cross-breeding contributed to poor health.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
If you think royalties are unhealthy, what about nobles? What about rich merchants? They lived WAY shorter lives than almost everyone in the 21st century. Explain that.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...do the basic homework and explore how Pasteur's theory really came about...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious What is a bit strange with the Pasteur process (as so many others) is that there are secondary effects not "admitted".
It's like, people believe that when Chlorine is used the "bad stuff" magically disappears; but it does not, new compounds are made and they are harmful.
With Pasteurisation you get a lot of fragments and organic solutions (DNA etc.) floating around in the liquid from the "blown up" germs.
Kenzofeis 1 month ago
@Kenzofeis
You obviously don't know the make up of bacteria, do you? a bacteria is mainly made of proteins and DNA. The proteins gets broken down by the body into amino acids, which breaks down into glucose and other harmless compounds. The DNA is broken down similarly also. The bacteria is dead, so it cannot protect itself against decomposition. Also, if chlorine can form compounds with proteins, DNA, etc, then it would be carcinogenic, but it's not, especially not in such low concentration.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
The basis of this medicalizing dynamic that has today become quite insane is of course Pasteur's germ theory of disease. We need poison pills to protect us from evil bacteria and viruses that are constantly seeking to ATTACK us!! We need to DESTROY the pathogens with poison and never mind if our healthy cells are destroyed in the process.
In fact, it shows how utterly primitive and psychotic our medical culture is...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
I have never seen a person as ignorant of science as you. The pills are not poison, they affect the entire human system on a MOLECULAR level. It is biochemistry, and even if I posted complex details on how medicine works, you won't understand and will continue to deny. Forget it, humans HAS NO SOULS! NO VITAL FORCES ARE AT WORK! we are all just a giant complex machine, and medicine inhibits or fixes certain signals givcen out by the body for pain relief.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Other medicines kills bacteria, which is excreting the real toxins, and gobbling up cells at the same time. They are not evil; they do that for survival. Still others repairs inhibited, malfunctioning or broken parts of the body.The inhibition of the body's immune system is sometimes essential for human survival, as it can sometimes kill you. Vaccines lets the body develop an immunity to a certain type of virus. Don't deny this, deny your questionable, naturopathic snake oil
weiming1998 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
He researched with a microscope and injected weakened bacteria into chickens, and did actual experiments instead of just accepting anecdotes.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'anecdotes'
The reason most people don't know Pasteur was a complete fraud, plagiarist, liar is that they're typically way too busy tipping their hats at all the big names while emptying themselves of all thought. They're too lazy to actually CHECK Pasteur's career and theories that only made it because PROMOTED by the establishment who realized -unlike you- what money, power, control would be derived from this awful theory that you obviously simply BELIEVE like any..
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Yes, I BELIEVE, but not because I'm brainwashed by "big pharma", but there is simply, too much evidence for germ theory of diseases. Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur is a plagiarist, the only thing that matters is that his theory on how bacteria/virus causes diseases were right, and hundreds of years of medical science confirms it. No snake oil is going to overturn the hundreds of years of research by hundreds and thousands of scientists.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'alternatives'
Regardless of other available options and even when none can be procured at the flip of a hat, a sound scientific approach to all things involves the willingness to ALWAYS privelege truth, to analyze critically and honestly, and to only accept a theory as fact when the most rigid formal standards have been complied with.
The germ theory of disease does not meet the basic standards, nor does the hiv/aids dogma, regardless of alternatives.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
On a closing note, alternatives CAN BE procured, but only if the flawed basis is acknowledged first, and everything built on it reinterpreted...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...christian bigot accepts the immaculate conception. This is quite understandable, mind you, it is a dogma in society. Some people are willing to actually do some homework and CHECK such dogma's, while the mass conformist simply isn't interested,, so I won't try to 'convince' you.
Pästeur's name today is held in very high regard, sort of like Freud's or any other influential prominent of the past. Yet the amazing scientific misconduct of both is perfectly well...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
It is not I that conform. it is you that denies and denies just because you listened to some naturopathic patients rambling about their dubious anecdotes. Also, I am not a Christian; I have no religion. Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur's prototype of the germ theory is flawed; medical science has since fixed it up, just like psychology has fixed up Freud's theories.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'because you listened to some naturopathic patients '
It is quite logical that you should 'think' this because you are a believer, meaning INDEED a religious person, whose religion is scientism, a religion you can only defend by CONSTANTLY appealing to authority and the majority and the OVERWHELMING evidence of it all, without ever being able to move beyond such rhapsodic slogans and actually explore any issue by YOURSELF -as I do, because contrary to what you...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weiming1998
...are constantly intimating, I am NOT a believer, nor a religious individual.
The following reasoning of yours:
'Also, it doesn't matter if Pasteur's prototype of the germ theory is flawed; medical science has since fixed it up, just like psychology has fixed up Freud's theories.'
is extremely typical of your faith, and invalidates from the start any hope of a reasonable exchange for the following reason:
you are NOT willing to explore the basis of ANY scientific..
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...dogma EVEN when it can be shown that it was pushed onto the collective in a 'VERY UNSCIENTIFIC' fashion.
This is of course very sloppy thinking, and you subsequently reassure yourself that since everybody else has basically done the same thing you are doing and the flawed dogma has as a result been MADE TO COME true using ANY means, ANY kind of useful evidence while ignoring all evidence to the contrary, that there can be no doubt today that it was true all along.
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
After all this time, I have never seen you present ONE evidence of why the germ theory don't work, only flaming Pasteur's theories and Pasteur himself and going on about some stupid conspiracy theory that medicine is evil and "Big Pharma" is behind this.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
So, we cannot explore the basis of the theory, all subsequent 'evidence' needs not be explored either because we already know it's true.
To willfully ignore a flawed basis and hope that what's been edified on it is solid anyway is indeed a religious mindframe that would be completely unworkable in the less faith-based sciences and area's, such as engineering. No architect could go by such a blind faith and hope to sell a house with a rotten foundation while keeping a..
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Exploring the basis of a flawed theory, which has been fixed up long since, and using the flawed version of the theory as evidence that the entire theory don't work is akin to thinking "Newton didn't consider the bending of spacetime and quantum gravity, so the theory of gravity is obviously untrue."
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...clear conscience.
Neodarwinist atheists do it routinely.
'The HIV virus was actually SEEN through an electron microscope, and you have the nerves to deny its existence'
The question I asked you was:
'Why don't you tell me if you think this supposed virus exists in what scientific publication its isolation was first described?'
Surely you can put up a bit more than outrage and incredulity since this is a very straightforward question that should be easy...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Easy, just google "HIV virus isolated and read the first few articles. If you don't cherry-pick alt-medicine sites claiming garbage, then it should be pretty easy.
weiming1998 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@weiming1998
'Easy, just google "HIV virus isolated and read the first few articles. If you don't cherry-pick alt-medicine sites claiming garbage, then it should be pretty easy.'
This is no answer to my utterly straightforward question that I now send you for a THIRD time:
please cite the publication first confirming the successful isolation of HIV.
What's the problem?
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...to answer, since in your mind there can be no doubt about the existence of this virus and surely there must exist a paper that first published the isolation of it? Hmm?
My other question is also worth repeating:
' Why, if the virus was isolated do serological HIV analyses rely on a combination of TWO tests, Western Blot + Elisa, neither of which is actually SPECIFIC to a supposed Hiv-virus, its presence being INFERRED through floating protocols?'
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
Because making a SPECIFIC test to detect a type of virus might look easy to you, but actually it is extremely difficult. The two tests are probably like this; one covers a potential metabolism product / a gene, the other covers exceptions; different metabolism products and sometimes a variation in the gene.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
'The two tests are probably like this; one covers a potential metabolism product / a gene, the other covers exceptions; different metabolism products & sometimes a variation in the gene.'
Who cares about 'probably'?
'It is extremely difficult'
Oh my, sorry for being so frivolously naive, professor!
Are you really suggesting it's logical that a virus-specific test has NOT been developed?
Wouldn't you say ANYTHING & EVERYTHING is logical provided it's the way authority does things?
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
@suddenlyitsobvious
OF COURSE NOT! The government/authority has banned glassware and chemicals. Of course I don't agree with that. Also, Stop using ad hominem and just provide some EVIDENCE, ok? And as I said before, specific tests are very difficult to develop because even the same virus has gene variations, but it wouldn't matter to you; you are totally ignorant of medical science and biochemistry.
weiming1998 1 month ago
@weiming1998
...documented and accessible for anyone willing to base their assessments on REALITY, on FACTS, rather than on paradigmatical mantra's that are well-known to be blatant deceptions by insiders and those with a minimum of curiosity and literacy...
suddenlyitsobvious 1 month ago
Baking Soda is also the BEST & most efficaious (effective) facial scrub / exfoliate.
Simply moisten face with water, lather with a little facial wash & then VERY, VERY gently apply about 1 teaspoon of BAKING SODA & massage in very gentle circular movements. Your face will feel like a baby's smooth bottom!
Soak smelly feet in a strong Bicarb & warm water solution regularly to kill the smell-causing bacterial / fungal culprits too.
Heartburn/acid reflux? Drink a glass of water + 1tsp Bicarb!
annie46664 7 months ago 4
You can also use baking soda mixed with a little water on your hair to get rid of the build up of styling products. Pour it on your hair and massage for about a minute, rinse and shampoo. Your hair will feel very clean and soft.
laceandcurls 10 months ago 4
@laceandcurls And don't forget to rinse with an tablespoon of apply vinegar diluted in two cups of warm water-:)
peperudi 4 months ago
Doctoring is from Germany, Japan and some countries in the bad period.
The medical science is losing people who really trust it.
Doctors these days are nearly like criminals.
Folky knowledges would be better to read.
ynkkim 1 year ago