Added: 2 years ago
From: freedomschool
Views: 3,448
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Look if you want protection of your capital, need to look at the married put as the best option or not get in at all, unless your a risk taker..own the stock, insure with the put and then write call options. If you get called away, sell the balance of the put options,,,the farther out the better the remaining value...wish i had when the housing bubble popped

  • Thanks Golden Bear... are you a RadioActive Trader? That describes the selling calls side of RT pretty well. Of course, now we are using ten Income Methods and call-selling is only one "option".

    Thanks for the post!

    K

  • I had thought that the critics were commenting that the "risk graphs" for the long call were the same(identical) as the married put as opposed to them actually being identical. For example, one owns stock and an ITM put and the other is a long call.

  • No, they're saying that a long call is "more efficient" than a married put because it requires less capital.

    I'll go along with that... as you'll see in the next video, "What about the Martingale Effect" the long call in a "requires less capital" scenario is MUCH more efficient at losing you money. ;-)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more