Ancienne ramasseuse de balle a roland garros en 2006. j'ai fais la haie d'honneur des gars. Très très impressionnant, le centrale bondé. Sa donne des frissons qd tu es sur le terrain ...
Nadal is simply the best tennis player of History at his age. It's stupid to compare on present time Rafa with Roger. The comparison must be between Rafa and Roger at the age of Rafael. Roger only had a Gran Slam by then and Nadal already has 5. And 30 trophies. Nobody has won more than Nadal at his age. If Nadal has proved to be better than Federer at his peak, think about what is going to happen when Nadal reaches his own peak. The Spaniard is at another level.
nadal its the best player, what happens is he's spanish, so you say that, he's only 22 years old, somebody else could win 3 rolland garros for three years? think no, even agazzi, so, he sucks but hes the king!!!
federer won 5 straight wimbledons, and 5 straight us opens. plus he woulda kept winning wimbledon if they didnt slow it down, you cant even serve and volley anymore.
hahahha , shows how little you know about Tennis! when did federer ever serve and volley at wimbledon! haha wimbledon has been slowing down since the 90's and even when sampras won in 2000 was getting slow. Then it slowed down further until hewitt won in 2002 by proably coming to the net twice in the tournement, since then it been pretty consistent. Rafa nadal just outplayed and out battled him last year.
shows how much i know about tennis, good one cocksucker, watch federer sampras in 2001 if you wanna see him serve and volley...instead of insulting me maybe you coulda asked for an example of him serve and volleying first, anyway, there you go.
er,actually that match if you've actually watched it serve and volleying wise was merely average, and with sampras he was always going to serve and volley as it was his natural game. Watch that match and the sampras and wimbledon in the 90's and see the difference then. Anyway thats beside the point. Whats that got to do with your argument. I said a massive change came in 2002 when hewitt won it from the baseline. If you think federer won five wimbeldon's by serve and volleying then thats a joke
yah i have it on my comp, pretty good mix of serve and volley and some baseline play. but ya, in the 90's it was pretty much purely serve and volley. anything after 2002 is pretty much just baseline play, too bad really, theyve got almost no grass left on tourand the grass they have isnt really traditional grass, otherwise roddick, fed and karlovic would probly dominate there, and i think nadal would have quite a bit of trouble making it past the quarters.
OMARMacBETH: He so does NOT suck! He is a powerhouse not to be reckoned with! You're an idiot for making such a comment...but what do you expect from someone named "Omar".
nadal and federer ftw!!!!!
turkville 1 month ago
Djokovic NO 1.!!! :D
dabi58 6 months ago
Thank you Mr. Federer. We, tennis fans, will never see a player like you again, unfortunately...
gags069 1 year ago
Roger Love
federerbestclass 2 years ago
@federerbestclass Gay comment. Please use your brain a bit
gigatron4 1 year ago
Stupid music!!! the tennis is in silence. . . please!!!
lacromozart 2 years ago
this year in wimbledon
the surface was again faster than
2008
so again roger won
so even if nadal had played
he hardly would've reached the final
next year roger will reach 7th wimbledon
championships and also his 2nd
roland garros .. i can bet on that
joesulub 2 years ago
LOL!
martinezaguado 2 years ago
@joesulub Want to bet on 2nd Roland Garros?
mavsfan1000 1 year ago
@joesulub You sure as fuck were wrong kid. Rafa is the best player ever, regardless of Federer's achievements.
sup3rh1k 1 year ago
Ancienne ramasseuse de balle a roland garros en 2006. j'ai fais la haie d'honneur des gars. Très très impressionnant, le centrale bondé. Sa donne des frissons qd tu es sur le terrain ...
laetitenniswoman 2 years ago
ou on peut revoir les finales 06.07 de Fed vs Nad? merci
snappycruise 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nadal is simply the best tennis player of History at his age. It's stupid to compare on present time Rafa with Roger. The comparison must be between Rafa and Roger at the age of Rafael. Roger only had a Gran Slam by then and Nadal already has 5. And 30 trophies. Nobody has won more than Nadal at his age. If Nadal has proved to be better than Federer at his peak, think about what is going to happen when Nadal reaches his own peak. The Spaniard is at another level.
omenow 3 years ago
Et oui nadal monte en puissance technique,l'anné proch,n°1
misscastafior 3 years ago 2
vamos nadal!!!!!!!
lyonnaizz 3 years ago 2
Esta muy bien montado
miaspain93 3 years ago
imagenes son imagenes!!! no son videooos!!
cero07y 3 years ago
nadal its the best player, what happens is he's spanish, so you say that, he's only 22 years old, somebody else could win 3 rolland garros for three years? think no, even agazzi, so, he sucks but hes the king!!!
leiflaguz 3 years ago
Björn borg has won it for 4 times in a row!
CboyNL 3 years ago
Nadal won his fourth straight French Open title this year, dumbass!
clarriona 3 years ago
federer won 5 straight wimbledons, and 5 straight us opens. plus he woulda kept winning wimbledon if they didnt slow it down, you cant even serve and volley anymore.
shawnharris43 3 years ago
hahahha , shows how little you know about Tennis! when did federer ever serve and volley at wimbledon! haha wimbledon has been slowing down since the 90's and even when sampras won in 2000 was getting slow. Then it slowed down further until hewitt won in 2002 by proably coming to the net twice in the tournement, since then it been pretty consistent. Rafa nadal just outplayed and out battled him last year.
Boromir1 2 years ago
shows how much i know about tennis, good one cocksucker, watch federer sampras in 2001 if you wanna see him serve and volley...instead of insulting me maybe you coulda asked for an example of him serve and volleying first, anyway, there you go.
shawnharris43 2 years ago
er,actually that match if you've actually watched it serve and volleying wise was merely average, and with sampras he was always going to serve and volley as it was his natural game. Watch that match and the sampras and wimbledon in the 90's and see the difference then. Anyway thats beside the point. Whats that got to do with your argument. I said a massive change came in 2002 when hewitt won it from the baseline. If you think federer won five wimbeldon's by serve and volleying then thats a joke
Boromir1 2 years ago
yah i have it on my comp, pretty good mix of serve and volley and some baseline play. but ya, in the 90's it was pretty much purely serve and volley. anything after 2002 is pretty much just baseline play, too bad really, theyve got almost no grass left on tourand the grass they have isnt really traditional grass, otherwise roddick, fed and karlovic would probly dominate there, and i think nadal would have quite a bit of trouble making it past the quarters.
shawnharris43 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NADAL SUCKS!
OmarMacbeth 3 years ago
OMARMacBETH: He so does NOT suck! He is a powerhouse not to be reckoned with! You're an idiot for making such a comment...but what do you expect from someone named "Omar".
in2b8ix2b8 3 years ago 3
nadal looks like a mouse lol but he's powerful
bboybase 3 years ago
Nadaaalll bravoo...bravooo Nadal
julsn11 3 years ago 7
youtube is for freking videos
xxxrocksta69rxxx 3 years ago 10
was that between nadal and puerta?
headsupqueer 4 years ago
no, the final against puerta was in roland garros 2005
danuskas 4 years ago
actually i was just responding to funkymonkskiedis' comment. dont know why the response thing didnt work
headsupqueer 4 years ago
i want to watch that to the 2005finale it was very good so plz post it it any one hv that ........
luvkaka22 4 years ago
Does anyone have the entire roland garros 2005 final?
I want that video so bad, if anyone knows where I can get it, please tell me!
thanks!
funkymonkskiedis 4 years ago