character for them. they are certainly more libertarian and anti government control after all they want freedom for all not government forced.
knowledge should be free copyrights,patents are a hindrance on society. those are government enabled monopolies imo though one should have some ability to profit from them but not to the extreme degree that has been going on.
corps should have to be forced to produce rather than relying on their past forever.
RON PAUL FANS ON YOUTUBE... WEBSITES LIKE YAHOO, FOXNEWS, CNN, AND OTHER SITES ARE NOT FOR RON PAUL LIKE WE ARE HERE ON YOUTUBE! START COMMENTING ON THOSE OTHER SITES!! GET RON PAUL POPULAR THERE TOO! SHUT THE MEDIA UP! AND RESTORE AMERICA!
PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS ALL AROUND YOUTUBE! LIKE SO PEOPLE CAN SEE!
Come on people...the message IS pretty straight forward! Anonymous does NOT endorse one party or one candidate over another.They protect the PEOPLES' right to FREE speech and access to KNOWLEDGE!!! So if you see other videos that are for or against a particular party or candidate that "SAYS" there from Anonymous...guess what....it's BULLSPIT!!!! Live Long and Prosper!!!
If you listened to the man you would realize why he is republican. As a third party candidate he spent all of his money just to get on a ballot. Running as a republican has FORCED the main stream media to cover him. Even now you can see their clear bias in the fact that he gets less exposure than even the lowest polling candidates in the race. He is not a sell out like the rest of the GOP field, he doesn't owe any favors and he doesn't tow the party line. He is our LAST chance.
Wait Anonymous do you realize what you are saying? Ron Paul is a Libertarian first and foremost he is not a real Republican he first ran as a Libertarian and that is what he will always be. Do you even know what a Libertarian stands for? I think you should do your home work on that one. Because I already did.And something else I have told the people for a while now to stop voting for Republicans and Democrats that they are the ones ruining this Country and no one listened.He will stand up for us
@Mrscientificmethod no. anonymous would be pro libertarian because libertarianism believes in protecting what is constitutional and protecting freedoms and rights. anon is anti-government...as are libertarians.
OKAY WTF?? This is NOT Anonymous, this is just a persons opinion BUT we have to start somewhere & FREEDOM is where we have to start. We have to end these senseless wars. So who do you have in mind? OBAMA? ROMNEY? America just look whats going on here, People bitch about the NDAA bill. "WE NEED TO DO MORE THAN MAKE VIDEOS" Tell me do you think RON PAUL would sign the NDAA bill? Do you think he would sign the SOPA/PROTECT IP bill? Get a clue... this douche probable works for FOx or CNN.
@Laughingblades lol quit trollin loser, if your against ron paul, you're against your own freedom...you're against stopping war propaganda....you're against civil liberties...you're for big corrupt corporations...you're basically a sheep that feeds only what the corrupt elites tell you :( so sad that you have been misguided to believe something thats morally wrong and evil
I support Anonymous, and I support Ron Paul. However, support does not have the Transitive Property. Some people support one but not the other, and some people support both. They work towards different ways of going about protecting different freedoms.
What will Anonymous do to stop these assaults on our civil liberties? It is more than just freedom of speech. Every right we have is being challenged. What about NDAA? Thats gives the military the right to make a person like me or you just vanish in thin air never to be seen again? If you won't take a stand the traditional way, what will you do!? Now is not the time for arguing and bickering. Now is the time for UNITY! What will you do? What side are you on? Good or evil!? Choose now!
The fact that you are saying your famous "We do not forgive, we do not forget" statement to the "Paultards" as anons have so blatantly put it, proves that you indeed are against him, therefor affiliating yourself with politics. You would be wise to watch what you say about politics just after you claim to not be involved in politics.
@IcyJ314 again we do not know how much more clear we can make it that we do not support any individual candidate or are opposed to any candidate. Others have also explained, and you would be wise to listen to them, instead of picking every little word we said apart. We never said we were against Ron Paul or for him. How is that not clear? Although we do not appreciate the advert spam for Ron Paul.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r They have several videos against him. Maybe I used the wrong words, but if they speak out against some one, then I am against them.
@madlibsluver anonymous should not play politics. That is for the people to decide. We just help those that are being oppressed and do not have a voice. We are not a political party. This message was broadcast as way to help explain to others that we do not support nor oppose Ron Paul. Apparently it does not work on the fanatics, so we end up having to ban them from spamming the whole channel with adverts. That is not what we are here for.
@AnonymousIntercourse I understand. Also, I know that probably not all of you support Occupy, but to those who do and have been involved in it, thank you.
Some would say the question really is, does Ron Paul endorse Anonymous. The answer will determine if most people see Anonymous as criminals looting credit card info,or selfless visionaries trying to liberate the world from tyranny.
Here is the hypocracy of this whole deal:
2006 - V for Vendetta released, popularizing Guy Fawkes mask.
2007 - Ron Paul supporters begin wearing them to rallies and protests.
Well since Ron Paul has been trying to regain the peoples' liberties and freedoms and create transparent government for over 30 years, it could be said that Anonymous has just imitated Ron Paul.
Ron Paul spoke out on the congressional floor, on debates, and on the campaign trail in support of Wikileaks and the fact that it is a positive and necessary organization.
how could you not admire what Dr. Paul is trying to do? i'm my humble opinion, he is a true patriot. it means nothing to "you" that he holds the number one purveyor of deception and corruption's feet to the fire, the federal reserve? who does Anonymous propose to become the leader of the free world then? our sovereignty and liberty are at stake, and i believe a staunch constitutionalist is exactly what this country needs right now. a man who doesn't use that sacred document to wipe his ass.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r So Ron Paul is completely honest ? Well most crazy people usually are.
Crazy people and kids don't understand the concept of compromise.
Crazy people think 300 million Americans are going to be running around like Pirates with bags of doubloons around their necks. There isn't remotely enough gold or silver in the world. Luddite constitutionalists are crazy.
@SirJesusMonkey who then monkey? please, enlighten me. and don't say that you don't have an opinion, because you're "Anonymous," as if that's some sort of infallible response, because it's a fucking cop-out.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r Hey if people want to vote for Ron Paul that's their business just don't drag the name of Anonymous into it and if they do I'll keep on " taking the piss" which is my right also.
And if I see anyone claiming Anon is endorsing Obama or Mitt Gingrich I'll do likewise.
@SirJesusMonkey that's cool man, i'm not trying to drag anybody in to anything. i mean, i haven't made any video claiming that anon IS in fact endorsing [candidates name here], nor will i. i'm just curious as to why they wouldn't want to sorta of give a wink and a nod to RP, being as he's the only candidate challenging the status quo, and generally trying to jam a thumb in their eye..
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r anonymous is suppose to function as a way to help those that are bullied and oppressed to have a voice, and an increasingly oppressive world. meddling in politics is not why anonymous was created. Our image would suffer if we endorsed any candidate. We endorse the people, and the freedom of their ideas and ideals. Many times most political leaders oppress others, no matter their political affiliation, and that is what we are here for, to defend against that.
@SirJesusMonkey Huntsman perhaps? or is he crazy too? because last time i checked, "Anonymous" was not a ballot option. it's amazing to me how people cannot fathom this experiment. do you really believe Ron Paul will do more damage than yo boy Barry? well how's this for some vinegar in you coffee: .rt.com/usa/news/detention-legislation-torture-senate-891/
head on over there for an entertaining read. maybe you can speak in generalities about that as well.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r like any major organization in history, many are trying to take over anonymous as an allie for their greed, and power. We are not a political party, and we need to stay away from that. That is for the people to decide individually when they vote. We just help to protect that right, and to protect people's right to express their ideas and/or ideals.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r it is not our place to stand behind any candidate. You argue a mote point. We are already beyond that, but you will not see that. "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject". ~Winston Churchill
@AnonymousIntercourse i'm not fanatical about Ron Paul, or politics in general, but i am extremely interested in shaking up the status quo. and you would be hard-pressed to deny that there is any other candidate, other than Dr. Paul, willing to mount such an offensive. i can admire that.
this video makes sense, and i get it, how can "you" be one thing if "you" are everything. but i have a feeling, deep down, in the recesses of your various lairs, you all collectively want the real change that Dr. Paul could POTENTIALLY bring to American politics. Ron Paul has shaken the foundations of my political apathy. in a not-so-distant past, i could give a flying fuck who was running for whatever, and i feel very strongly that there's something to be said for that. we HAVE to try.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r anonymous has no place in politics, we are only here to help to protect people's right to vote, not to appeal to people on who they should vote for. As individuals people in anonymous are of different political affiliations, and they make their choice when they vote.
@AnonymousIntercourse True but Guy Fawkes is political. Why can't the mask be on Ron Paul? Ron Paul is so much like the character V for Vendetta. Why can't the government use your name to steal the election in Iowa. Which they did. Ron Paul won that election and you so called anonymous done nothing to protect the people's right to vote. Dr. Ron Paul 2012 for President.
@anonymousIntercourse Im not upset about anything. Anonymouse does not have a vote in the election so why would they support anyone? But if you are a citizen of the US you have a say and even if you affiliate with anonymous you still should go out and vote. If you are tired of corporate greed in America you vote Ron Paul. If not it will politics as usual.
@CoryThe411 How do you expect to do the same thing you have always done(voting) and get a different result?Do you understand that every candidate since WWII, winner and loser, has been a member of the CFR? The Illuminati always owns both candidates. Ron Paul is a complete psyop. The same way that Barry was, and the rabid, close minded rhetoric of his supporters eerily mirrors Barrys' of four years ago.The SYSTEM is the problem and will not be fixed by the election of one man.
@CoryThe411The system is not controlled by the people or the politicians. Its controlled by the banking cartels that make up the Fed. I think talking about an election is a moot point anyway because with the passage of the NDAA, we are moving toward martial law and a suspension of the election anyway. The powers that be are getting scared because the masses are waking up. They are going to move to suppress the rebellion they feel coming from the people so they can keep their power.
@JADEDRAVER43 i was thinking the exact same thing. no miranda rights, no trial, indefinite detention upon suspicion of malicious or dissenting conduct. it's crazy. it's really scary legislation, passed under the cover of darkness, with a 93% senate approval rating. has anything in the senate ever been so unanimous? my god, what the fuck.
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r Its already starting. I had a friend yesterday who got a visit from DHS questioning her and her spouse over things she has posted and said on Facebook regarding the government. Events are going to start taking place that people of this country think only happen in foreign countries. The financial collapse in Europe and the riots they are having are going to be here soon and that's when we are really going to see things get really oppressive over here.
@JADEDRAVER43 i'll let you know if the same thing happens to me, as i have been quite vocal on FB about our government as well. none of it good. on that note, regarding dissenting views on politics and government, it's the ultimate in frustration when you pour your heart out to people, bleeding red, white, and blue, and you get shit in response. i simply cannot get enough people excited about doing their part to help change Washington. apathy will ruin our nation.
@CoryThe411 yes people should vote! We are trying to protect that right, but should not or will not appeal to people to vote for one person over another. We only try to protect people's right to express their ideas and ideals in safety. The reason on why this video was made, was due to the fanaticism with some candidates specifically Ron Paul. This is not to say we are specifically against Ron Paul, only against fanaticism in a way that takes rights away from others.
@Constitutionallysane it is not always easy to have constructive conversations on the internet. many choose to use their anonymity to pester and put down others also known as trolling, which is not what anonymous is about. We have a greater purpose and use our anonymity for that purpose.
@HappilyCyn as we have said before, you are welcome to contribute to the the discussion as long as it is constructive, which this isn't. This is considered advert for Ron Paul spam and will be removed. If you post like this again you will be banned.
5 ways to tell this is fake. #1 he doesn't use 1 of 5 songs we created for his video, #2 He doesn't have the much hidden design of paneling back and fourth between certain videos on certain seconds to show who the real ones are. #3 The robotic voice doesn't even come close to the pitch we use. #4 He doesn't have the 100 subscribers from the real group hell he only has seven. #5 he has absolutely no idea what mIRC is...
@sk8erpro10 we really only have one comment for you, that we are all are anonymous, and if it is your intention to be exclusive, that is obviously not anonymous. We are all anonymous, and there are no specific exclusive members or groups of anonymous. We think that would defeat the whole purpose.Your ego gets in the way, and for that can destroy anonymous.
So if you heard the news today Herman Cain is all done which leaves 2 Republican insiders for the nomination.
I admire your guys pluck but there's NO WAY the RNC would ever give Ron Paul the nomination. The Republicans co-opted the Tea Party and gutted it. Any candidate remotely associated with the Tea Party is now TOAST.
See that's how they play it in the real world kids. Sorry.
@Etrajbe So if you heard the news today Herman Cain is all done which leaves 2 Republican insiders for the nomination.
I admire your guys pluck but there's NO WAY the ruling class would ever give Ron Paul the nomination. The Republicans co-opted the Tea Party and gutted it. Any candidate remotely associated with the Tea Party is now TOAST.
See that's how they play it in the real world kids. Sorry.
@jOkErNdEgRaDeR you are welcome to contribue to the conversation, but we ask that you do not spam the whole channel with the same message over and over again, or you will be banned.
The uploader speak about Ron Paul, and not supporting parties? Since when has Ron Paul ever been loyal to a party rather than the Constitution of the United States of Americam, and liberty? Also just because Constitutionalists/Libertarians/etc, have a spokesperson doesn't mean that their aren't fringe "supporters" that stray from the message they proport to support. As someone who endorses Ron Paul, I also would be gratefull if people stopped associating him with Anonymous, similar cause or not.
Anonymous does not endorse political candidates using the name of Anonymous especially candidates who are Social Darwinists who if elected would leave the weakest among us to fend for themselves.
if you want to endorse L Ron Paul or any other candidate FINE just don't drag the name of Anonymous into it.
Paultards stop using the name of Anonymous because...
@TheBornAnnoying Lol the only reason we make this message is because anon cant. Unless its a unanimous vote anon cant claim anything. Ron Paul just has some of the same Ideas as the majority.
@PolPotSticker HAHAHAHA First things first, age is perception my dear noob. You know nothing about what goes on in this organization or who the real players are. If i'm a frog that's because i'm frogger in the game we call life. I have to jump across the rode and make it so the other side of humanity. After that I have to concur the alligator's that represent our government to land to safety which is our freedom.
anonymous is a fraud, i know i look at the cia files an the european union, it al part of the plan to fund both sides.END THE FEDS, RON PAUL 2012!, END THE NEW WORLD ORDER, FREEDOM, END THE POLICE STATES, FREEDOM IS TRUTH, AN TRUTH IS POWER
@CoryThe411 what are you upset about. We have respectfully said we do not endorse any candidate no matter who they are. That is not our purpose. We are not a political party, nor endorse any political party. We are made up of everyone, so it would be unfair to us if we endorse one candidate over another.
To Anonymous: Do you think you have a monopoly on the Guy Fawkes mask? Did you know that for every one of those masks bought, FOX gets royalties? Does this mean you support FOX? What do you endorse? Freedom? Truth? Knowledge? These are the things Ron Paul endorses. Seems like you are endorsing the status quo and failure more than anything else. After all, your "operations" have all failed. Scientology, still around. The Federal Reserve, still around. FaceBook, still around. Anonymous=FAIL!
@sbeutler ...Yes, I'm sure all this is a ploy to make money from Guy Fawks masks and DvD sales... Your ignorance astounds, and your willingness to put down anonymous, for whatever illogical or biggoted reasons you may have, disgusts me. Try doing something with your life, serving a greater purpose, and perhaps I will listen to you. Until then, keep licking the hand that feeds you. "May your chains sit lightly upon you and posterity forget ye were ever our countrymen."
@AvatarOfStrife Look @ 0:26. The maker of the video points out that an image of Ron Paul wearing a Guy Fawkes mask and a revolution shirt as if Anonymous has the trademark on the image. Some of the Anon group do support Ron Paul. He has been fighting for our freedom before you even knew what freedom was. He wrote a best selling book called END THE FED, have you read it? He is educating people on the very same things that Anon is about, that's what disgusts me.
Furthermore, if you think that there will be a revolution without infiltrating and changing the system from within, then it's going to get ugly. The system will treat you like the OWS movement by using force to be rid of you. At a time like this, it is very important to know your allies in the fight for freedom, by writing them off, you have already lost. United we will win, divided we will all bear the chains of slavery. Do you understand?
@sbeutler Real Anons don't buy their masks and if they do they get them cheap from China in bulk. Anon is a hive a collective you know like the Borg. Resistance is futile ..you will be ASS-stimulated. We don't give a fuck about L Ron Paul or his cult or your fucking country. Let it Burn.
>Do you think you have a monopoly on the Guy Fawkes mask?
Do you know when and why some groups of Anon started wearing masks?
>After all, your "operations" have all failed. Scientology, still around.
Co$ is a shell of its former self, hemorrhaging members, cash and orgs since Project Chanology. Of course when we say "orgs" we really mean empty fields with Scilon office addresses lol.
The Collective does not endorse Ron Paul, nor do many if any in the collective see him as the savior his followers make him out to be. Stop looking to politicians to save you, stop following political leaders and accepting everything they say as true.
@DrTronPaul The reason people like Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Boehner are getting away with insider trading is because they are Jesuits, or friends of the Jesuits, or under the protection of the Society of Jesus.
@DrTronPaul How could you possibly speak for the "collective"? How arrogant you must be. We must use ALL forms of change available to us, not depend on one avenue for change (I agree with you here). Vote Ron Paul in the republican primary, for he serves, and has served, we the people. Since there is no central leadership in Anonymous, and you have no way of knowing the opinion of others (including mine), your claims are as void of meaning as you perceive the democratic process to be. <--4free
@AvatarOfStrife No one can speak for the collective themselves, ideas must prove themselves in the democracy of ideas, and the Ron Paul cult is a fringe in the collective that gets ripped to shreds and torn down, and is probably just the same people posting over and over again. Instead of asking me how I can speak for the collective, ask the guy who made this video.
I agree. The purpose of Anonymous is to defend freedom of speech and free information on the Internet (Knowledge is Free), NOT to promote any candidate/political party/[enter pet political group here]. Even as a Ron Paul supporter, I support Anon's refusal to dirty themselves with such political games. To all my fellow RP supporters trying to use the Anon meme to promote RP, I say STOP. To quote an awesome character from the Babylon 5 tv series: "The truth points to itself."
@steelbrushtattoo A good response would be "SOME anonymous support Ron Paul, and some don't." Considering Ron Paul has been the most vocal politician calling out the banksters, and the federal reserve banking system, I can see why SOME anonymous support him. But not all. Could it ever be ALL in any regards?
"and for those who say you can't say you are Anonymous and be Anonymous"
I don't recall saying that, but it does defeat the point. Who we are doesn't matter. It's the information and the message that matters.
BTW your attitude is what we call raging newfaggotry. If you are going to claim participation as Anon, do the research so you don't embarrass yourself. Or trolled. Or doxed. Or all three!
@Daytripn Anonymous doesn't care if you like Ron Raul .Just don't drag our name into it or there will be a problem.
We didn't spend 4 years fighting the Church of $cientology and the OSA just to let a bunch of born again konspiracy kooks and uber patriot newfags steal our brand.
@theplaniscancer I didn't need to make a video, thier are plenty already. This one is from 2007 , I can't get the url to post, but go to v for vendetta Ron Paul here on youtube. notice the date.
If a group of people who are supposed to be smart like anon cant see that ron paul is our last hope, then anon consists of fools of the highest caliber.
@Aquariuscomfort Like I said before, there are alot of things that are spread that aren't true. Ther are videos and documents etc. about any given candidate claiming they are racist, anti-christian, anti- this or that. If he is a homophobe, or a racist, it hasn't been demonstrated by his actions or his voting record in the last 40 years he's been in politics. You sure paint with a broad brush when you assume what he thinks and will do. You are wrong.
@aquariuscomfort Also it never fails to amaze me how people who rail against media and accuse others of character assasination, mis-information, etc. Will beleive and repeat anything published that suits their personal beleifs and prejudices. The issues you brought against Dr. Paul are not secrets they have been broadcast far and wide hundreds of times. What hasn't, is his VOTING record, which always follows the Constution, and is in the spirit of independence and limited govt interferance.
@Daytripn Ron Paul is the wrong person to be in charge of anything. If it was up to him we would revert back to having slaves I am sure. He is not about liberty at all, only about oppression against those that do not look like him, act like him, or believe in his ideals. Government does need to interfere in many circumstance, and we the people had decided that and asked them too, for real liberty and equality for everyone, not just the rich and white, and straight. He is NOT for OWS.
@aquariuscomfort You make many assumptions about Ron Paul, and I fail to see where in his voting record you see him attempting to use the force of government to enslave anyone.
@aquariuscomfort Ron Paul was using the Anon logo and it's message in 2007 long before they began calling for world change, or before anyone had even heard of Anon. Ron Paul supporters began the tea party, then abandoned it when corporate repubs orverran it. Dr. Paul supports OWS because they are calling for complete restructuring of our gov't and supports the Constitution. Anon DOES support Ron Paul. Maybe not you, maybe not alot of them, but I am Anonymous and I support Dr. Ron Paul.
@Daytripn how can you be Anonymous by saying you are Anonymous. LOL Ron Paul claimed to have started ther Tea party from his own mouth even though the majority of the Tea Party said otherwise. He is now trying to take over OWS, not just be a part of it. it will never happen for it is a real grassroots movement. How about his racist and homophobic past as well?
@theplaniscancer His campaign staff used Nov 5th and the guy fawkes image as a fundraising technique in 2007. He raised a record 4 mill in 24 hours. (scroogle guy Fawkes, Ron Paul 2007) Ron Paul himself admitted that he was unaware of why his staff thought it would be a good reference, but he thanked them for it afterwards. Glenn Beck used this as a reason to demonize Ron Paul supporters as potential terrorists. I imagine you would like that. ;)
@theplaniscancer No confusion regarding Glenn Beck. This happened in 2007. Long before Anon's were getting the mainstreams attention. Many anons DO support Ron Paul's limited government message. It was the message in V for vendetta, which is why the staff chose to go with it. Considering your disdain for Ron Paul's supposed racist remarks, I am quite alarmed to see you use homophobic comments for the 2nd time. Let's try to be good representatives of anon and avoid terms like "faggotry" shall we?
"No confusion regarding Glenn Beck. This happened in 2007. Long before Anon's were getting the mainstreams attention." Not that long. We got attacked by FOX in early 2008. But the point was Daytripn was implying RP has something to do with starting Anon, at least is public and that's bs. Be nice to hear what Daytripn meant.
"Let's try to be good representatives of anon and avoid terms like "faggotry" shall we?"
@theplaniscancer Daytripn is referring to exactly what I pointed out, except he forgot to clarify that it was anonymous supporters of Ron Paul who used the imagery and symbolism of our movement, not Ron Paul himself. Adam Kokesh (a rabid fan of Ron Paul) has also used his show as a vehicle to promote anonymous Op's. He did, until RT canceled it. You can dismiss the homophobic comments as a "meme", but they are as mean spirited as the newsletters.
"except he forgot to clarify" Exactly. BTW Fawkes is not the 1st symbol of Anon
"You can dismiss the homophobic comments as a "meme", but they are as mean spirited as the newsletters." You have now removed all doubt that you are a Newfag. Thanks for playing. ;)
It's not a bad thing...we were all newfags once. I facepalm thinking about the shit I got wrong back in the day, lol. "Fag", "faggotry", "-fag" have nothing to do with homophobia(or homosexuality) in the Anon collective.
@theplaniscancer Fawkes wasn't the 1st, just the best and most memorable. When I call your comments homophobic. I am referring to the impression left on those who might not be aware of your inside joke. The ones that we want to encourage to join but that might be turned off (so to speak) by your lame attempt at meme humor. Do as you like, but I'm in this for more than lulz.
"When I call your comments homophobic. I am referring to the impression left on those who might not be aware of your inside joke. The ones that we want to encourage to join but that might be turned off by your lame attempt at meme humor. "
You have no idea how out of touch u sound. It's cute. *tousles head*
It's not a habit made up to annoy you personally. It's part of the culture you are so ignorant about. No amount of bawing will change that. Who are these "others" and why care?
""Who are these "others" and why care?" No comment on my part is even needed here. "
Actually it is needed. Your comment sounded like you were concerned that "others" might be turned off from joining Anonymous just b/c of 4chan slang. Clearly YOU weren't turned off from identifying with the collective; so why would you expect "others" would be? It sounds like you have a very good idea who these "others" are. I've never heard of Anon "worried" about getting "membership"...
@theplaniscancer My lack of response was due to your shortsighted lack of interest in growing the ranks of Anonymous. When you use "slang" words like FAG, or NIGGER, even if your intention is for lulz...those not in the know will be offended. You know what they say about first impressions and all...Instead of inspiring people to want to work for freedom with us, you will inspire people to dislike the very idea of anonymous. Cleverness is good, compassion is better.
@theplaniscancer "Actually it is needed." you said this in regards to my lack of response. Not so much complaining as it was telling me it was needed, but whatever. You never said "Nigger," I did. Hence the lack of quotation marks. To me a prejudiced slur about sexual orientation is the same as one based upon race. Both disgusting and worth our scorn. I agree, when anonymous (members) openly support candidates it hurts our image. Almost as much as when our (members) call people "fags" for lulz.
"Almost as much as when our (members) call people "fags" for lulz."
It's not for lulz...it's just slang, 8yerbraintrust. You're not being taken you seriously b/c I'm the only Anon you single out for criticizim for using "fag", in spite of at least 2 others posting in threads you participated in, one u were going back and forth with. So um yeah, that was a thing. U argue dishonestly. U claim authority from a place of ignorance. U sound like u have an agenda. Have fun with that.
@theplaniscancer Agenda? lol. I singled you out because U made a video going after someone for being racist. I was only having a little fun at your expense pointing out the outsiders perspective on your homophobic "slang" words. No offense, but I really don't care about what your thoughts are regarding my intentions or arguing style. But please, do as you like. You are free! :D One question though...why did 4chan allow lolicon on their site for so long? ;)
"I singled you out because U made a video going after Ron Paul for being racist."
Fixed that for you. So "New Anonymous" as your friends call it has a problem with freedom of information? That video would never have been made if Paultards newfags weren't spamming lies that Anonymous as a collective supported RP. Those of us who fought the other Con by Ron..with the same BS denials of documented racist material...object to this.
@theplaniscancer Now who's putting words in who's mouth? bro...you mad? Seriously, I don't mind what you put out, I applaud your efforts at keeping a close watch on politicians, even Ron Paul. I was just curious how you reconciled your hatred of racism with your blatant use of homophobic memes. And then there is that whole lolicon issue...but hey, whatever floats your boat. Peace to you and your loved one's. :D
"Do as you like, but I'm in this for more than lulz."
It's obvious from my videos that I'm in it for moar than just lulz. That's why I identify as a moralfag. And if you are not aware of this "inside joke" as you call it, you are not part of the established Anon community. Rule 48, which you have yet to ask about, was proposed at WWP:
Rule 48: Anyone who then comes to the community demanding an end to the vulgarity is told to GTFO and nothing of value is lost.
@theplaniscancer In regards to rule 48, I don't remember "demanding" anything of you or anyone else. I just wanted to point one of the results of using charged words like "fag", along with attempting to label people into various categories of any sort. Division and hurt feelings inevitably follow. But I am no censor, I will say it again..."Do as you like..." and enjoy your lulz.
Anonymous MUST abstain from supporting any candidate, even one as good as Ron Paul. Principles not personalities. Politicians are individuals, and easy to discredit, thus hurting those who have aligned with them. But ideas...are bulletproof.
@8yerbrain I agree, but some of these idiots say otherwise, even saying they are anonymous which obviously defeats the whole purpose of being Anonymous duh. LOL
The truth about Ron Paul and how he uses other organizations for his own purposes, and pretends he invented them and he is aligned with them. There is a 15 minute new Anonymous video about the BS surrounding Ron Paul and his habit of trying to take over other organizations like Anonymous. Any video showing Anonymous supports Ron Paul is not true.
What organization has he not tried to take over as his own?OWS, Anonymous, Liberalism, the Tea Party? Think about it. He is very bad news.
@karinkdf unless of course it is obama. Go on believing the demogoguery instead of doing some real research into the economic and liberty reasoning of why ron paul says those things. By blindly stating he just wants to end those things, you are showing your ignorance. Good day.
With all due respect to Anonymous, I don't think that a shadowy org that hides their face from the people to be a source worth trusting. I'm a proud supporter of Ron Paul for too many reasons to list here. That being said if America is going to have a chance to recover, we need to be on the same page. Anonymous is known by people as either a hacker group or a bunch of CIA operatives. It's time to come out of the shadows and face the reality we all face in 2011.
@shadowedge69 the reason we remain anonymous is for the protection of everyone including you. It gives people a voice, and freedom for the truth without repercussions. When even one person admits to being part of anonymous, it defeats the whole purpose, and instead we become individuals.
Many in Anonymous are activists as well I am sure, but that is different business. In some countries the only way to protect us is by being Anonymous.
@karinkdf The purpose of this video was to let people know that the purpose of Anonymous is not to support ANY particular candidate. We were not clear enough?
The propagandists are hard at work attempting to hijack the Occupy movement for the purpose of electing more corrupt tea party politicians.
Ron Paul has video up wherein he proposes ending public programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security... ending government student loans... repealing the Civil rights act... and dismantling government. He also has an anti-choice ad up online AND declares disbelief in evolution. He's a theocrat.
@karinkdf Not really, most theocrats want to use the force of government to make you believe and do as they want you to. Ron Paul wants to reduce government to a level where it no longer intrudes into our private lives, fucks with our internet, bombs innocents overseas and imprisons people in a failed war on drugs. Yes he want's to end federal programs, but stealing from one person to pay for another is still theft. No way around that.
Don't support Ron Paul or the Tea Party but support the violence from Occupy Wall Street, and the socialist rhetoric that many down there are calling for? I know that at least in Syracuse that the "General Assembly" is made up of Marxists. I was verbally attacked and threatened by union a union thug and a Green Party candidate who IS admittedly a socialist. Apparently my anti-marxist message was not welcome there. So much for free speech, guess it's only free speech you agree with right Anonymou
@EFBauer21 was it free speech or were you purposely trying to antagonize them and start a fight? Many think in the US, you may say anything you want, for that is Freedom of Speech. This is a gross wrongful interruption. Obscenity is NOT protected according to the US Supreme Court. What is the Freedom to Express different Ideals or Ideas. Freedom of information and expression of ideals, is what we in Anonymous are really trying to protect.
@AnonymousIntercourse Do marxists automatically have the benefit of not being threatening or abusive? your response makes no sense, although it does sound very biased. I do not think you are a member of anon. and if you are, you guys need to come up with some way to separate you out from all the individuals using your style etc.
OMG you know how many kids have an Anonymous account?
Everyone and their grandma pretends to be Anonymous, will the real Anonymous please stand up?
necroexmortis 1 week ago
Anonymous is just a stupid film idea contrained by clishes and theoretical ideas.
Ron Paul is a real threat against the establishment.
Anonymous just seems more and more like some people who have watched V for vendeda and are fooling around.
turbofritz2 1 week ago
character for them. they are certainly more libertarian and anti government control after all they want freedom for all not government forced.
knowledge should be free copyrights,patents are a hindrance on society. those are government enabled monopolies imo though one should have some ability to profit from them but not to the extreme degree that has been going on.
corps should have to be forced to produce rather than relying on their past forever.
Koushi82 2 weeks ago
look if you guys know how to hack a slight bit you would already know that there are fake anon posing as the real ones.
the real ones are better at it with their website while the FAKE ones are copy cat them trying to use their name to win support.
if you know anything about hacking you can easily see if they are newbies or not. and see if they are the real deal.
but if you must watch their past and present actions and not blindly follow. Knowledge is power. anti ron paul for anon is out of
Koushi82 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL FANS ON YOUTUBE... WEBSITES LIKE YAHOO, FOXNEWS, CNN, AND OTHER SITES ARE NOT FOR RON PAUL LIKE WE ARE HERE ON YOUTUBE! START COMMENTING ON THOSE OTHER SITES!! GET RON PAUL POPULAR THERE TOO! SHUT THE MEDIA UP! AND RESTORE AMERICA!
PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS ALL AROUND YOUTUBE! LIKE SO PEOPLE CAN SEE!
machomamajr 4 weeks ago
Come on people...the message IS pretty straight forward! Anonymous does NOT endorse one party or one candidate over another.They protect the PEOPLES' right to FREE speech and access to KNOWLEDGE!!! So if you see other videos that are for or against a particular party or candidate that "SAYS" there from Anonymous...guess what....it's BULLSPIT!!!! Live Long and Prosper!!!
hybeerian 1 month ago
If you listened to the man you would realize why he is republican. As a third party candidate he spent all of his money just to get on a ballot. Running as a republican has FORCED the main stream media to cover him. Even now you can see their clear bias in the fact that he gets less exposure than even the lowest polling candidates in the race. He is not a sell out like the rest of the GOP field, he doesn't owe any favors and he doesn't tow the party line. He is our LAST chance.
fantomdave 1 month ago 6
Wait Anonymous do you realize what you are saying? Ron Paul is a Libertarian first and foremost he is not a real Republican he first ran as a Libertarian and that is what he will always be. Do you even know what a Libertarian stands for? I think you should do your home work on that one. Because I already did.And something else I have told the people for a while now to stop voting for Republicans and Democrats that they are the ones ruining this Country and no one listened.He will stand up for us
jacval60 1 month ago
@jacval60 Anonymous are anti Ron Paul. Anonymous are anti libertarian.
Mrscientificmethod 1 month ago
@Mrscientificmethod no. anonymous would be pro libertarian because libertarianism believes in protecting what is constitutional and protecting freedoms and rights. anon is anti-government...as are libertarians.
Brookiecrisps 1 month ago
would be sweet if Anonymous was a self party xD
Clownfefe 1 month ago
OKAY WTF?? This is NOT Anonymous, this is just a persons opinion BUT we have to start somewhere & FREEDOM is where we have to start. We have to end these senseless wars. So who do you have in mind? OBAMA? ROMNEY? America just look whats going on here, People bitch about the NDAA bill. "WE NEED TO DO MORE THAN MAKE VIDEOS" Tell me do you think RON PAUL would sign the NDAA bill? Do you think he would sign the SOPA/PROTECT IP bill? Get a clue... this douche probable works for FOx or CNN.
JimmerGstring 1 month ago 8
@Flash02021990 please explain how?
kerry31088 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BREAKING NEWS: " Rick Santorum surges as Paul's numbers fade in Iowa "
Oh so sorry my little Ronulans
Better luck next time when your boy will be 83 if he's still alive ROLF !
enolapayback 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am NOT ANONYMOUS
I have AN IDENTITY, I will NOT BE IGNORED
I do NOT FEAR, anonymity is succumbing to fear
I AM CLEAN AND TRUTHFUL
If youre afraid, support someone who is unafraid and make vids for him. You spook us, because JFK said the very word secrecy is repugnant . . .
my anonymity not, my identity is under threat
ashwadhwani 2 months ago
anon is somehow the human overmind, or the true living essence of the internet, talking to me
hejjagheterpal 2 months ago
27 Paulbots are mad that Anonymous doesn't support Ron Paul
Laughingblades 2 months ago
@Laughingblades lol quit trollin loser, if your against ron paul, you're against your own freedom...you're against stopping war propaganda....you're against civil liberties...you're for big corrupt corporations...you're basically a sheep that feeds only what the corrupt elites tell you :( so sad that you have been misguided to believe something thats morally wrong and evil
chunkylover817 2 months ago
@chunkylover817 #Tryharder.
None of what you say logically follows, if you mean any of it, you're part of the problem.
Laughingblades 2 months ago
@Laughingblades lol ok, who are you voting for?
wtf are you talking about? are you that stupid?!
chunkylover817 2 months ago
PLEASE ANYONE WHATS THE NAME OF THE SONG??
laylow7582 2 months ago
A political party is a machine... just because you are affiliated with one does not mean you stand for what they do.
slumberingsam 2 months ago
WHATS THIS SONG CALLED?????????????
laylow7582 2 months ago
I support Anonymous, and I support Ron Paul. However, support does not have the Transitive Property. Some people support one but not the other, and some people support both. They work towards different ways of going about protecting different freedoms.
EnsisDraconis 2 months ago
What will Anonymous do to stop these assaults on our civil liberties? It is more than just freedom of speech. Every right we have is being challenged. What about NDAA? Thats gives the military the right to make a person like me or you just vanish in thin air never to be seen again? If you won't take a stand the traditional way, what will you do!? Now is not the time for arguing and bickering. Now is the time for UNITY! What will you do? What side are you on? Good or evil!? Choose now!
CoryThe411 2 months ago
@CoryThe411 anonymous is working on that as we speak.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@KhoulStoryBro I get it bro. Anonymous isn't a person it can't vote. But the people that make up Anon can. Power to the People!
CoryThe411 2 months ago
The fact that you are saying your famous "We do not forgive, we do not forget" statement to the "Paultards" as anons have so blatantly put it, proves that you indeed are against him, therefor affiliating yourself with politics. You would be wise to watch what you say about politics just after you claim to not be involved in politics.
IcyJ314 2 months ago
@IcyJ314 again we do not know how much more clear we can make it that we do not support any individual candidate or are opposed to any candidate. Others have also explained, and you would be wise to listen to them, instead of picking every little word we said apart. We never said we were against Ron Paul or for him. How is that not clear? Although we do not appreciate the advert spam for Ron Paul.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
Legit, the only reason why I won't vote for Ron Paul is because Anon doesn't like him.
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@madlibsluver then you are an idiot. "they" didn't say whether or not they liked, or disliked ANYONE. moron.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r They have several videos against him. Maybe I used the wrong words, but if they speak out against some one, then I am against them.
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@madlibsluver i came off a bit harsh, i don't know you...sorry.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r thank you for your apology, Live Long and Prosper.
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@madlibsluver anonymous should not play politics. That is for the people to decide. We just help those that are being oppressed and do not have a voice. We are not a political party. This message was broadcast as way to help explain to others that we do not support nor oppose Ron Paul. Apparently it does not work on the fanatics, so we end up having to ban them from spamming the whole channel with adverts. That is not what we are here for.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
Comment removed
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse I understand. Also, I know that probably not all of you support Occupy, but to those who do and have been involved in it, thank you.
From
An Occupier.
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse But Anonymous are playing politics. See the Anonymous vids that are specifically anti Ron Paul.
Mrscientificmethod 1 month ago
Some would say the question really is, does Ron Paul endorse Anonymous. The answer will determine if most people see Anonymous as criminals looting credit card info,or selfless visionaries trying to liberate the world from tyranny.
Here is the hypocracy of this whole deal:
2006 - V for Vendetta released, popularizing Guy Fawkes mask.
2007 - Ron Paul supporters begin wearing them to rallies and protests.
2008 - Anon begins wearing them to protests.
Actually, Anon is copying Ron Paul supporters
brendanmcwilliams 2 months ago
Well since Ron Paul has been trying to regain the peoples' liberties and freedoms and create transparent government for over 30 years, it could be said that Anonymous has just imitated Ron Paul.
Ron Paul spoke out on the congressional floor, on debates, and on the campaign trail in support of Wikileaks and the fact that it is a positive and necessary organization.
brendanmcwilliams 2 months ago
@brendanmcwilliams ""A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject"." ~Winston Churchill
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse
How cryptic. Especially in regards to comments about Annonymous and Ron Paul posted on a video called "Annonymous Ron Paul".
Maybe I am just not understanding the meaning, but I believe everyone would be with me on this one.
brendanmcwilliams 2 months ago
how could you not admire what Dr. Paul is trying to do? i'm my humble opinion, he is a true patriot. it means nothing to "you" that he holds the number one purveyor of deception and corruption's feet to the fire, the federal reserve? who does Anonymous propose to become the leader of the free world then? our sovereignty and liberty are at stake, and i believe a staunch constitutionalist is exactly what this country needs right now. a man who doesn't use that sacred document to wipe his ass.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r So Ron Paul is completely honest ? Well most crazy people usually are.
Crazy people and kids don't understand the concept of compromise.
Crazy people think 300 million Americans are going to be running around like Pirates with bags of doubloons around their necks. There isn't remotely enough gold or silver in the world. Luddite constitutionalists are crazy.
Nothing is sacred to Anonymous.
SirJesusMonkey 2 months ago
@SirJesusMonkey who then monkey? please, enlighten me. and don't say that you don't have an opinion, because you're "Anonymous," as if that's some sort of infallible response, because it's a fucking cop-out.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r Hey if people want to vote for Ron Paul that's their business just don't drag the name of Anonymous into it and if they do I'll keep on " taking the piss" which is my right also.
And if I see anyone claiming Anon is endorsing Obama or Mitt Gingrich I'll do likewise.
SirJesusMonkey 2 months ago
@SirJesusMonkey that's cool man, i'm not trying to drag anybody in to anything. i mean, i haven't made any video claiming that anon IS in fact endorsing [candidates name here], nor will i. i'm just curious as to why they wouldn't want to sorta of give a wink and a nod to RP, being as he's the only candidate challenging the status quo, and generally trying to jam a thumb in their eye..
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r anonymous is suppose to function as a way to help those that are bullied and oppressed to have a voice, and an increasingly oppressive world. meddling in politics is not why anonymous was created. Our image would suffer if we endorsed any candidate. We endorse the people, and the freedom of their ideas and ideals. Many times most political leaders oppress others, no matter their political affiliation, and that is what we are here for, to defend against that.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@SirJesusMonkey Huntsman perhaps? or is he crazy too? because last time i checked, "Anonymous" was not a ballot option. it's amazing to me how people cannot fathom this experiment. do you really believe Ron Paul will do more damage than yo boy Barry? well how's this for some vinegar in you coffee: .rt.com/usa/news/detention-legislation-torture-senate-891/
head on over there for an entertaining read. maybe you can speak in generalities about that as well.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r like any major organization in history, many are trying to take over anonymous as an allie for their greed, and power. We are not a political party, and we need to stay away from that. That is for the people to decide individually when they vote. We just help to protect that right, and to protect people's right to express their ideas and/or ideals.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r it is not our place to stand behind any candidate. You argue a mote point. We are already beyond that, but you will not see that. "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject". ~Winston Churchill
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse i'm not fanatical about Ron Paul, or politics in general, but i am extremely interested in shaking up the status quo. and you would be hard-pressed to deny that there is any other candidate, other than Dr. Paul, willing to mount such an offensive. i can admire that.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
this video makes sense, and i get it, how can "you" be one thing if "you" are everything. but i have a feeling, deep down, in the recesses of your various lairs, you all collectively want the real change that Dr. Paul could POTENTIALLY bring to American politics. Ron Paul has shaken the foundations of my political apathy. in a not-so-distant past, i could give a flying fuck who was running for whatever, and i feel very strongly that there's something to be said for that. we HAVE to try.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago 4
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r anonymous has no place in politics, we are only here to help to protect people's right to vote, not to appeal to people on who they should vote for. As individuals people in anonymous are of different political affiliations, and they make their choice when they vote.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
Cool. But Mitt Romney is a pretty obvious and important target for you guys, so snap to it.
:D
deathofsmokey 1 month ago
@AnonymousIntercourse True but Guy Fawkes is political. Why can't the mask be on Ron Paul? Ron Paul is so much like the character V for Vendetta. Why can't the government use your name to steal the election in Iowa. Which they did. Ron Paul won that election and you so called anonymous done nothing to protect the people's right to vote. Dr. Ron Paul 2012 for President.
1upmydog 2 weeks ago
@anonymousIntercourse Im not upset about anything. Anonymouse does not have a vote in the election so why would they support anyone? But if you are a citizen of the US you have a say and even if you affiliate with anonymous you still should go out and vote. If you are tired of corporate greed in America you vote Ron Paul. If not it will politics as usual.
CoryThe411 2 months ago
@CoryThe411 How do you expect to do the same thing you have always done(voting) and get a different result?Do you understand that every candidate since WWII, winner and loser, has been a member of the CFR? The Illuminati always owns both candidates. Ron Paul is a complete psyop. The same way that Barry was, and the rabid, close minded rhetoric of his supporters eerily mirrors Barrys' of four years ago.The SYSTEM is the problem and will not be fixed by the election of one man.
JADEDRAVER43 2 months ago
@JADEDRAVER43 If the voters don't vote for the right candidate how can you expect the system to work?
CoryThe411 2 months ago
@CoryThe411The system is not controlled by the people or the politicians. Its controlled by the banking cartels that make up the Fed. I think talking about an election is a moot point anyway because with the passage of the NDAA, we are moving toward martial law and a suspension of the election anyway. The powers that be are getting scared because the masses are waking up. They are going to move to suppress the rebellion they feel coming from the people so they can keep their power.
JADEDRAVER43 2 months ago
@JADEDRAVER43 i was thinking the exact same thing. no miranda rights, no trial, indefinite detention upon suspicion of malicious or dissenting conduct. it's crazy. it's really scary legislation, passed under the cover of darkness, with a 93% senate approval rating. has anything in the senate ever been so unanimous? my god, what the fuck.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r Its already starting. I had a friend yesterday who got a visit from DHS questioning her and her spouse over things she has posted and said on Facebook regarding the government. Events are going to start taking place that people of this country think only happen in foreign countries. The financial collapse in Europe and the riots they are having are going to be here soon and that's when we are really going to see things get really oppressive over here.
JADEDRAVER43 2 months ago
@JADEDRAVER43 i'll let you know if the same thing happens to me, as i have been quite vocal on FB about our government as well. none of it good. on that note, regarding dissenting views on politics and government, it's the ultimate in frustration when you pour your heart out to people, bleeding red, white, and blue, and you get shit in response. i simply cannot get enough people excited about doing their part to help change Washington. apathy will ruin our nation.
0neB4dM0th3rFuck3r 2 months ago
@JADEDRAVER43 Only time will tell
CoryThe411 2 months ago
@CoryThe411 yes people should vote! We are trying to protect that right, but should not or will not appeal to people to vote for one person over another. We only try to protect people's right to express their ideas and ideals in safety. The reason on why this video was made, was due to the fanaticism with some candidates specifically Ron Paul. This is not to say we are specifically against Ron Paul, only against fanaticism in a way that takes rights away from others.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse I am seeing Anonymous vids that say Ron Paul is a scientologist. WTF?
Mrscientificmethod 1 month ago
@Constitutionallysane it is not always easy to have constructive conversations on the internet. many choose to use their anonymity to pester and put down others also known as trolling, which is not what anonymous is about. We have a greater purpose and use our anonymity for that purpose.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse Thank you Anon. You have done so much for us.
madlibsluver 2 months ago
@Desnoxvu we consider this to be spam and will be removed. If you post spam again you will be banned.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@HappilyCyn as we have said before, you are welcome to contribute to the the discussion as long as it is constructive, which this isn't. This is considered advert for Ron Paul spam and will be removed. If you post like this again you will be banned.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
5 ways to tell this is fake. #1 he doesn't use 1 of 5 songs we created for his video, #2 He doesn't have the much hidden design of paneling back and fourth between certain videos on certain seconds to show who the real ones are. #3 The robotic voice doesn't even come close to the pitch we use. #4 He doesn't have the 100 subscribers from the real group hell he only has seven. #5 he has absolutely no idea what mIRC is...
sk8erpro10 2 months ago
@sk8erpro10 we really only have one comment for you, that we are all are anonymous, and if it is your intention to be exclusive, that is obviously not anonymous. We are all anonymous, and there are no specific exclusive members or groups of anonymous. We think that would defeat the whole purpose.Your ego gets in the way, and for that can destroy anonymous.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
Anonymous and his stupid masks are juvenile. Period.
themaclady 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WERK IS FER JERKS
WE B PYRATES
LIVING ON PERCS
ARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGH !
PolPotSticker 2 months ago
So if you heard the news today Herman Cain is all done which leaves 2 Republican insiders for the nomination.
I admire your guys pluck but there's NO WAY the RNC would ever give Ron Paul the nomination. The Republicans co-opted the Tea Party and gutted it. Any candidate remotely associated with the Tea Party is now TOAST.
See that's how they play it in the real world kids. Sorry.
jOkErNdEgRaDeR 2 months ago 2
wooooo scary
stillrob420 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Etrajbe So if you heard the news today Herman Cain is all done which leaves 2 Republican insiders for the nomination.
I admire your guys pluck but there's NO WAY the ruling class would ever give Ron Paul the nomination. The Republicans co-opted the Tea Party and gutted it. Any candidate remotely associated with the Tea Party is now TOAST.
See that's how they play it in the real world kids. Sorry.
jOkErNdEgRaDeR 3 months ago
@jOkErNdEgRaDeR you are welcome to contribue to the conversation, but we ask that you do not spam the whole channel with the same message over and over again, or you will be banned.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
The uploader speak about Ron Paul, and not supporting parties? Since when has Ron Paul ever been loyal to a party rather than the Constitution of the United States of Americam, and liberty? Also just because Constitutionalists/Libertarians/etc, have a spokesperson doesn't mean that their aren't fringe "supporters" that stray from the message they proport to support. As someone who endorses Ron Paul, I also would be gratefull if people stopped associating him with Anonymous, similar cause or not.
defftony 3 months ago
TL:DR Furthermore my ass...
Anonymous does not endorse political candidates using the name of Anonymous especially candidates who are Social Darwinists who if elected would leave the weakest among us to fend for themselves.
if you want to endorse L Ron Paul or any other candidate FINE just don't drag the name of Anonymous into it.
Paultards stop using the name of Anonymous because...
We never forgive
We never forget
Expect Us
TheBornAnnoying 3 months ago 10
@TheBornAnnoying Lol the only reason we make this message is because anon cant. Unless its a unanimous vote anon cant claim anything. Ron Paul just has some of the same Ideas as the majority.
sk8erpro10 2 months ago
@sk8erpro10 You're a frog what the fuck do you care about some american that's old enough to be your grandfather ?
PolPotSticker 2 months ago
@PolPotSticker HAHAHAHA First things first, age is perception my dear noob. You know nothing about what goes on in this organization or who the real players are. If i'm a frog that's because i'm frogger in the game we call life. I have to jump across the rode and make it so the other side of humanity. After that I have to concur the alligator's that represent our government to land to safety which is our freedom.
sk8erpro10 2 months ago
coward
downwithignorance19 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anonymous is a fraud, i know i look at the cia files an the european union, it al part of the plan to fund both sides.END THE FEDS, RON PAUL 2012!, END THE NEW WORLD ORDER, FREEDOM, END THE POLICE STATES, FREEDOM IS TRUTH, AN TRUTH IS POWER
d0ct0rd3ath 3 months ago
Ron Paul represents the people just like Anonymous. Maybe Anon needs to wake up!!
CoryThe411 3 months ago 13
@CoryThe411 what are you upset about. We have respectfully said we do not endorse any candidate no matter who they are. That is not our purpose. We are not a political party, nor endorse any political party. We are made up of everyone, so it would be unfair to us if we endorse one candidate over another.
AnonymousIntercourse 2 months ago
@CoryThe411 such as banning abortion and giving more power to states notorious for putting their own religious values on the forefront of lawmaking?
mashersmasher 2 months ago
To Anonymous: Do you think you have a monopoly on the Guy Fawkes mask? Did you know that for every one of those masks bought, FOX gets royalties? Does this mean you support FOX? What do you endorse? Freedom? Truth? Knowledge? These are the things Ron Paul endorses. Seems like you are endorsing the status quo and failure more than anything else. After all, your "operations" have all failed. Scientology, still around. The Federal Reserve, still around. FaceBook, still around. Anonymous=FAIL!
sbeutler 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sbeutler ...Yes, I'm sure all this is a ploy to make money from Guy Fawks masks and DvD sales... Your ignorance astounds, and your willingness to put down anonymous, for whatever illogical or biggoted reasons you may have, disgusts me. Try doing something with your life, serving a greater purpose, and perhaps I will listen to you. Until then, keep licking the hand that feeds you. "May your chains sit lightly upon you and posterity forget ye were ever our countrymen."
AvatarOfStrife 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AvatarOfStrife Look @ 0:26. The maker of the video points out that an image of Ron Paul wearing a Guy Fawkes mask and a revolution shirt as if Anonymous has the trademark on the image. Some of the Anon group do support Ron Paul. He has been fighting for our freedom before you even knew what freedom was. He wrote a best selling book called END THE FED, have you read it? He is educating people on the very same things that Anon is about, that's what disgusts me.
sbeutler 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Furthermore, if you think that there will be a revolution without infiltrating and changing the system from within, then it's going to get ugly. The system will treat you like the OWS movement by using force to be rid of you. At a time like this, it is very important to know your allies in the fight for freedom, by writing them off, you have already lost. United we will win, divided we will all bear the chains of slavery. Do you understand?
sbeutler 3 months ago
@sbeutler Real Anons don't buy their masks and if they do they get them cheap from China in bulk. Anon is a hive a collective you know like the Borg. Resistance is futile ..you will be ASS-stimulated. We don't give a fuck about L Ron Paul or his cult or your fucking country. Let it Burn.
TehPornAnnoyedIsWack 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TehPornAnnoyedIsWack Then you lose, game, set and match.
sbeutler 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sbeutler
>Do you think you have a monopoly on the Guy Fawkes mask?
Do you know when and why some groups of Anon started wearing masks?
>After all, your "operations" have all failed. Scientology, still around.
Co$ is a shell of its former self, hemorrhaging members, cash and orgs since Project Chanology. Of course when we say "orgs" we really mean empty fields with Scilon office addresses lol.
You were saying something?
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
Holy shit guys (AnonymousIntercourse)
Doing this will only sully Anonymous and RP's images. Better to let each other go their own paths and let the magic happen.
dreamingWisdom 3 months ago
The Collective does not endorse Ron Paul, nor do many if any in the collective see him as the savior his followers make him out to be. Stop looking to politicians to save you, stop following political leaders and accepting everything they say as true.
DrTronPaul 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrTronPaul The reason people like Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Boehner are getting away with insider trading is because they are Jesuits, or friends of the Jesuits, or under the protection of the Society of Jesus.
Mannapages 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DrTronPaul How could you possibly speak for the "collective"? How arrogant you must be. We must use ALL forms of change available to us, not depend on one avenue for change (I agree with you here). Vote Ron Paul in the republican primary, for he serves, and has served, we the people. Since there is no central leadership in Anonymous, and you have no way of knowing the opinion of others (including mine), your claims are as void of meaning as you perceive the democratic process to be. <--4free
AvatarOfStrife 3 months ago
@AvatarOfStrife No one can speak for the collective themselves, ideas must prove themselves in the democracy of ideas, and the Ron Paul cult is a fringe in the collective that gets ripped to shreds and torn down, and is probably just the same people posting over and over again. Instead of asking me how I can speak for the collective, ask the guy who made this video.
DrTronPaul 3 months ago
I agree. The purpose of Anonymous is to defend freedom of speech and free information on the Internet (Knowledge is Free), NOT to promote any candidate/political party/[enter pet political group here]. Even as a Ron Paul supporter, I support Anon's refusal to dirty themselves with such political games. To all my fellow RP supporters trying to use the Anon meme to promote RP, I say STOP. To quote an awesome character from the Babylon 5 tv series: "The truth points to itself."
basletum 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@notjam3
"search for : Lucis trust behind OWS
search for : pope calls for world bank and supports OWS
search for : Gorbachev supports OWS and a NWO
Anonymous IS a JESUIT CIA - FBI "Controlled Opposition" group..."
COOL STORY BRO
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@notjam3 Interesting. But I still like him as a mascot. He died attempting to stop government. I can't help but like that on principle alone.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All you people claiming there's NO PROOF of Ron Paul's racism must not be looking very hard.
All you have to do is google " ron paul racist" and the first two pages that come up provide all the PROOF necessary.
Paul even admitted writing some of the articles in question to the Dallas Morning News.
blogcritics org/politics/article/a-quick-investigation-into-ron-pauls/
tnr com/blog/jonathan-chait/88421/ron-pauls-racism
sharkattacksteve 3 months ago
@sharkattacksteve
Don't point them to facts...it'll make them cry...
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@steelbrushtattoo A good response would be "SOME anonymous support Ron Paul, and some don't." Considering Ron Paul has been the most vocal politician calling out the banksters, and the federal reserve banking system, I can see why SOME anonymous support him. But not all. Could it ever be ALL in any regards?
8yerbrain 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and for those who say you can't say you are Anonymous and be Anonymous, remember We are everyone, we are no one, we are legion.
Daytripn 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Daytripn
"and for those who say you can't say you are Anonymous and be Anonymous"
I don't recall saying that, but it does defeat the point. Who we are doesn't matter. It's the information and the message that matters.
BTW your attitude is what we call raging newfaggotry. If you are going to claim participation as Anon, do the research so you don't embarrass yourself. Or trolled. Or doxed. Or all three!
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Daytripn They are flagging your comments as spam? so much for freedom of information.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer also search v for Ron Paul parts 1 through 3 also published in 2007 on youtube
Daytripn 3 months ago
@Daytripn Anonymous doesn't care if you like Ron Raul .Just don't drag our name into it or there will be a problem.
We didn't spend 4 years fighting the Church of $cientology and the OSA just to let a bunch of born again konspiracy kooks and uber patriot newfags steal our brand.
sharkattacksteve 3 months ago
@sharkattacksteve
OH NOES! You said newFAGS! *covers monitor*
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer I didn't need to make a video, thier are plenty already. This one is from 2007 , I can't get the url to post, but go to v for vendetta Ron Paul here on youtube. notice the date.
Daytripn 3 months ago
If a group of people who are supposed to be smart like anon cant see that ron paul is our last hope, then anon consists of fools of the highest caliber.
TheLivingfreekshow 3 months ago
@Aquariuscomfort Like I said before, there are alot of things that are spread that aren't true. Ther are videos and documents etc. about any given candidate claiming they are racist, anti-christian, anti- this or that. If he is a homophobe, or a racist, it hasn't been demonstrated by his actions or his voting record in the last 40 years he's been in politics. You sure paint with a broad brush when you assume what he thinks and will do. You are wrong.
Daytripn 3 months ago
@aquariuscomfort Also it never fails to amaze me how people who rail against media and accuse others of character assasination, mis-information, etc. Will beleive and repeat anything published that suits their personal beleifs and prejudices. The issues you brought against Dr. Paul are not secrets they have been broadcast far and wide hundreds of times. What hasn't, is his VOTING record, which always follows the Constution, and is in the spirit of independence and limited govt interferance.
Daytripn 3 months ago
@Daytripn Ron Paul is the wrong person to be in charge of anything. If it was up to him we would revert back to having slaves I am sure. He is not about liberty at all, only about oppression against those that do not look like him, act like him, or believe in his ideals. Government does need to interfere in many circumstance, and we the people had decided that and asked them too, for real liberty and equality for everyone, not just the rich and white, and straight. He is NOT for OWS.
aquariuscomfort 3 months ago
@aquariuscomfort You make many assumptions about Ron Paul, and I fail to see where in his voting record you see him attempting to use the force of government to enslave anyone.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Daytripn
"Will beleive and repeat anything published that suits their personal beleifs and prejudices. "
Reread this while you look in a mirror.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@aquariuscomfort Ron Paul was using the Anon logo and it's message in 2007 long before they began calling for world change, or before anyone had even heard of Anon. Ron Paul supporters began the tea party, then abandoned it when corporate repubs orverran it. Dr. Paul supports OWS because they are calling for complete restructuring of our gov't and supports the Constitution. Anon DOES support Ron Paul. Maybe not you, maybe not alot of them, but I am Anonymous and I support Dr. Ron Paul.
Daytripn 3 months ago
@Daytripn how can you be Anonymous by saying you are Anonymous. LOL Ron Paul claimed to have started ther Tea party from his own mouth even though the majority of the Tea Party said otherwise. He is now trying to take over OWS, not just be a part of it. it will never happen for it is a real grassroots movement. How about his racist and homophobic past as well?
aquariuscomfort 3 months ago
@Daytripn
"Ron Paul was using the Anon logo and it's message in 2007 long before they began calling for world change, or before anyone had even heard of Anon."
Which logo are you talking about? Dox please. Message image links. OR tiny url. Whichever.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer His campaign staff used Nov 5th and the guy fawkes image as a fundraising technique in 2007. He raised a record 4 mill in 24 hours. (scroogle guy Fawkes, Ron Paul 2007) Ron Paul himself admitted that he was unaware of why his staff thought it would be a good reference, but he thanked them for it afterwards. Glenn Beck used this as a reason to demonize Ron Paul supporters as potential terrorists. I imagine you would like that. ;)
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"Ron Paul himself admitted that he was unaware of why his staff thought it would be a good reference, but he thanked them for it afterwards."
Thank you. He had no idea, ruling out any V for Vendetta faggotry tie in.
"Glenn Beck used this as a reason to demonize Ron Paul supporters as potential terrorists. "
When did this happen[mo/yr]? FOX news ran several hit pieces about Anon being terrorists/hate group around this time. You might be confusing them.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer No confusion regarding Glenn Beck. This happened in 2007. Long before Anon's were getting the mainstreams attention. Many anons DO support Ron Paul's limited government message. It was the message in V for vendetta, which is why the staff chose to go with it. Considering your disdain for Ron Paul's supposed racist remarks, I am quite alarmed to see you use homophobic comments for the 2nd time. Let's try to be good representatives of anon and avoid terms like "faggotry" shall we?
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"No confusion regarding Glenn Beck. This happened in 2007. Long before Anon's were getting the mainstreams attention." Not that long. We got attacked by FOX in early 2008. But the point was Daytripn was implying RP has something to do with starting Anon, at least is public and that's bs. Be nice to hear what Daytripn meant.
"Let's try to be good representatives of anon and avoid terms like "faggotry" shall we?"
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Sorry, rule 48 brah! :D
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer Daytripn is referring to exactly what I pointed out, except he forgot to clarify that it was anonymous supporters of Ron Paul who used the imagery and symbolism of our movement, not Ron Paul himself. Adam Kokesh (a rabid fan of Ron Paul) has also used his show as a vehicle to promote anonymous Op's. He did, until RT canceled it. You can dismiss the homophobic comments as a "meme", but they are as mean spirited as the newsletters.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"except he forgot to clarify" Exactly. BTW Fawkes is not the 1st symbol of Anon
"You can dismiss the homophobic comments as a "meme", but they are as mean spirited as the newsletters." You have now removed all doubt that you are a Newfag. Thanks for playing. ;)
It's not a bad thing...we were all newfags once. I facepalm thinking about the shit I got wrong back in the day, lol. "Fag", "faggotry", "-fag" have nothing to do with homophobia(or homosexuality) in the Anon collective.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer Fawkes wasn't the 1st, just the best and most memorable. When I call your comments homophobic. I am referring to the impression left on those who might not be aware of your inside joke. The ones that we want to encourage to join but that might be turned off (so to speak) by your lame attempt at meme humor. Do as you like, but I'm in this for more than lulz.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"When I call your comments homophobic. I am referring to the impression left on those who might not be aware of your inside joke. The ones that we want to encourage to join but that might be turned off by your lame attempt at meme humor. "
You have no idea how out of touch u sound. It's cute. *tousles head*
It's not a habit made up to annoy you personally. It's part of the culture you are so ignorant about. No amount of bawing will change that. Who are these "others" and why care?
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer "Who are these "others" and why care?" No comment on my part is even needed here. Good luck with that! ;)
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
""Who are these "others" and why care?" No comment on my part is even needed here. "
Actually it is needed. Your comment sounded like you were concerned that "others" might be turned off from joining Anonymous just b/c of 4chan slang. Clearly YOU weren't turned off from identifying with the collective; so why would you expect "others" would be? It sounds like you have a very good idea who these "others" are. I've never heard of Anon "worried" about getting "membership"...
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer My lack of response was due to your shortsighted lack of interest in growing the ranks of Anonymous. When you use "slang" words like FAG, or NIGGER, even if your intention is for lulz...those not in the know will be offended. You know what they say about first impressions and all...Instead of inspiring people to want to work for freedom with us, you will inspire people to dislike the very idea of anonymous. Cleverness is good, compassion is better.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"My lack of response"
Who said I was complaining about u not responding lol?
"When you use "slang" words like FAG, or NIGGER,"
Nice attempt at putting words in my mouth. Quote where I said "nigger".
"Instead of inspiring people to want to work for freedom with us, you will inspire people to dislike the very idea of anonymous."
Actually the Paultards pretending to be Anon are doing that all by themselves.
Enjoy your Cappuchino Occupatio.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer "Actually it is needed." you said this in regards to my lack of response. Not so much complaining as it was telling me it was needed, but whatever. You never said "Nigger," I did. Hence the lack of quotation marks. To me a prejudiced slur about sexual orientation is the same as one based upon race. Both disgusting and worth our scorn. I agree, when anonymous (members) openly support candidates it hurts our image. Almost as much as when our (members) call people "fags" for lulz.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
Another cappichino occupatio, I see. Hmmm tasty!
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"Almost as much as when our (members) call people "fags" for lulz."
It's not for lulz...it's just slang, 8yerbraintrust. You're not being taken you seriously b/c I'm the only Anon you single out for criticizim for using "fag", in spite of at least 2 others posting in threads you participated in, one u were going back and forth with. So um yeah, that was a thing. U argue dishonestly. U claim authority from a place of ignorance. U sound like u have an agenda. Have fun with that.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer Agenda? lol. I singled you out because U made a video going after someone for being racist. I was only having a little fun at your expense pointing out the outsiders perspective on your homophobic "slang" words. No offense, but I really don't care about what your thoughts are regarding my intentions or arguing style. But please, do as you like. You are free! :D One question though...why did 4chan allow lolicon on their site for so long? ;)
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"I singled you out because U made a video going after Ron Paul for being racist."
Fixed that for you. So "New Anonymous" as your friends call it has a problem with freedom of information? That video would never have been made if Paultards newfags weren't spamming lies that Anonymous as a collective supported RP. Those of us who fought the other Con by Ron..with the same BS denials of documented racist material...object to this.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer Now who's putting words in who's mouth? bro...you mad? Seriously, I don't mind what you put out, I applaud your efforts at keeping a close watch on politicians, even Ron Paul. I was just curious how you reconciled your hatred of racism with your blatant use of homophobic memes. And then there is that whole lolicon issue...but hey, whatever floats your boat. Peace to you and your loved one's. :D
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
COOL STORY BRO
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@8yerbrain
"Do as you like, but I'm in this for more than lulz."
It's obvious from my videos that I'm in it for moar than just lulz. That's why I identify as a moralfag. And if you are not aware of this "inside joke" as you call it, you are not part of the established Anon community. Rule 48, which you have yet to ask about, was proposed at WWP:
Rule 48: Anyone who then comes to the community demanding an end to the vulgarity is told to GTFO and nothing of value is lost.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@theplaniscancer In regards to rule 48, I don't remember "demanding" anything of you or anyone else. I just wanted to point one of the results of using charged words like "fag", along with attempting to label people into various categories of any sort. Division and hurt feelings inevitably follow. But I am no censor, I will say it again..."Do as you like..." and enjoy your lulz.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
Anonymous MUST abstain from supporting any candidate, even one as good as Ron Paul. Principles not personalities. Politicians are individuals, and easy to discredit, thus hurting those who have aligned with them. But ideas...are bulletproof.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@8yerbrain I agree, but some of these idiots say otherwise, even saying they are anonymous which obviously defeats the whole purpose of being Anonymous duh. LOL
aquariuscomfort 3 months ago
The truth about Ron Paul and how he uses other organizations for his own purposes, and pretends he invented them and he is aligned with them. There is a 15 minute new Anonymous video about the BS surrounding Ron Paul and his habit of trying to take over other organizations like Anonymous. Any video showing Anonymous supports Ron Paul is not true.
What organization has he not tried to take over as his own?OWS, Anonymous, Liberalism, the Tea Party? Think about it. He is very bad news.
aquariuscomfort 3 months ago
Amazed at how few down-votes you have. The Paultards hit my last two videos like locust, lol. It's been a Paulocaust! :D
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
@karinkdf unless of course it is obama. Go on believing the demogoguery instead of doing some real research into the economic and liberty reasoning of why ron paul says those things. By blindly stating he just wants to end those things, you are showing your ignorance. Good day.
deadpieface 3 months ago
With all due respect to Anonymous, I don't think that a shadowy org that hides their face from the people to be a source worth trusting. I'm a proud supporter of Ron Paul for too many reasons to list here. That being said if America is going to have a chance to recover, we need to be on the same page. Anonymous is known by people as either a hacker group or a bunch of CIA operatives. It's time to come out of the shadows and face the reality we all face in 2011.
shadowedge69 3 months ago
@shadowedge69 the reason we remain anonymous is for the protection of everyone including you. It gives people a voice, and freedom for the truth without repercussions. When even one person admits to being part of anonymous, it defeats the whole purpose, and instead we become individuals.
Many in Anonymous are activists as well I am sure, but that is different business. In some countries the only way to protect us is by being Anonymous.
aquariuscomfort 3 months ago
@gutzs trolling is not accepted here, and neither is petty instigating of spelling mistakes that is completely nonconstructive to the conversation.
AnonymousIntercourse 3 months ago
FAKE.
Neither Anonymous nor the Occupy movement are in the habit of shilling for politicians.
karinkdf 3 months ago
@karinkdf The purpose of this video was to let people know that the purpose of Anonymous is not to support ANY particular candidate. We were not clear enough?
AnonymousIntercourse 3 months ago
Hilarious!! Anonymous supports Ron Paul?!?
The propagandists are hard at work attempting to hijack the Occupy movement for the purpose of electing more corrupt tea party politicians.
Ron Paul has video up wherein he proposes ending public programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security... ending government student loans... repealing the Civil rights act... and dismantling government. He also has an anti-choice ad up online AND declares disbelief in evolution. He's a theocrat.
karinkdf 3 months ago
@karinkdf Not really, most theocrats want to use the force of government to make you believe and do as they want you to. Ron Paul wants to reduce government to a level where it no longer intrudes into our private lives, fucks with our internet, bombs innocents overseas and imprisons people in a failed war on drugs. Yes he want's to end federal programs, but stealing from one person to pay for another is still theft. No way around that.
8yerbrain 3 months ago
@steelbrushtattoo
"Anonymous DOE'S NOT support Ron Paul. This is a Republican ploy to harness the momentum that Anonymous has tapped into."
THIS. Well said, brah.
theplaniscancer 3 months ago
So by judging by this video, Anoymous is Marxist?
Where they sell the idea of "freedom" but then you just wind up as a Global-Zionist-Slave?...
ZionistJewFedReserve dottcomm
Freedom3777 3 months ago
Don't support Ron Paul or the Tea Party but support the violence from Occupy Wall Street, and the socialist rhetoric that many down there are calling for? I know that at least in Syracuse that the "General Assembly" is made up of Marxists. I was verbally attacked and threatened by union a union thug and a Green Party candidate who IS admittedly a socialist. Apparently my anti-marxist message was not welcome there. So much for free speech, guess it's only free speech you agree with right Anonymou
EFBauer21 4 months ago
@EFBauer21 was it free speech or were you purposely trying to antagonize them and start a fight? Many think in the US, you may say anything you want, for that is Freedom of Speech. This is a gross wrongful interruption. Obscenity is NOT protected according to the US Supreme Court. What is the Freedom to Express different Ideals or Ideas. Freedom of information and expression of ideals, is what we in Anonymous are really trying to protect.
AnonymousIntercourse 3 months ago
@AnonymousIntercourse Do marxists automatically have the benefit of not being threatening or abusive? your response makes no sense, although it does sound very biased. I do not think you are a member of anon. and if you are, you guys need to come up with some way to separate you out from all the individuals using your style etc.
preparadox 3 months ago