I've been to one of the places were Cadborosaurus is sighted, Cadboro Bay. I tried to look for it, but I didn't see it. I think it's real, mostly because of the carcass found in the whales stomach. How much more proof do you need? You can't fake a carcass inside of a whale, you would have to feed it to the whale before it was killed, and we all know that's not going to happen, a whale is not going to eat a fake carcass. To see a video about another lake monster, go to my channel.
A while back I thought this could be a prehistoric creature that hasn't been rediscovered yet and one of u went all Bible Humper on me.... however... I think It's a prehistoric shark.... the body is a perfect match to this....
From what I've seen, Ogopogo is a Caddy. The DeMara video of Ogie above water looks exactly like the Caddy video shown on Discovery Channel's Alaska Monster Hunt in July.
Man, the world really wants there to be a sea creature with a horse-like head and a long neck. Nessie started it in 1933- this continues it in 1937. I think it's probably some unidentified variety of fish, eel, whale. Nothing extinct or legendary. It's more reasonable to believe that the variety of our planet is not all documented than that dinosaurs still exist.
@JW41926 nessie didnt start this in 1937,this was seen since the 1400's and was drawn by map makers(here be monsters) recently a trident tailed beast filmed off of florida seems to match a monster drawn on maps from the 1500's.
i understand you are trying to make an entertaining video but that first case with the village and they found whale remnents in the stomach was proved just to be a basking shark it might not look like that but as they mature they change shape rapidly so make sure you get your facts right before you make a video but if you check your facts next time i will look forward to the next video
i believe these creatures exist, the world is full of mysteries you know... giant crabs, mammoths, prehistoric sharks they're all coming out one by one. :D
So that one episode on River Monsters about that guy's dad/friend, i don't remember, where his boat hit something big could be this "Caddy" they speak of? Man would love to see something like that.
1. Giant squid do not have a bony structure. 2. The "tiny" stomach is only tiny in comparison to the body size. It is of several hundred gallon capacity, over 2500 liters, depending on age. 3. My dad caught tiger sharks 10 feet long, and that's not acutally very big, volume-wise or in weight. Probably less than 50 kilos, 110 lbs.
but discovery channel never showed this very important proof to the public!! why?? at first they said to show up soon but never did. two called dates of showing in the channel were removed and quitted.....! why??? many journalists and newspapers asked for this video to show officially to the public and every time discovery channel said:"well, soon...!" but until today they didn't.
maybe there is some really genuine proof and some "powerfull group" permitted discovery channel to show up...!!!?
in the "Nushagak Bay-Alaska" there was a group of some cadborosaur's recorded on video by a fisherman's son and the caddy group had a young one with them. they were hunted by a group of "Beluga-Whales"! two experts examined the video and told the video shows definitive a school of unknown species. once one animal looked into the camera and one animal tried to protect the little young one of the whales attacks. all this is clearly visible and the video was selled to "discovery channel"!
Not saying that the Cadborosaurus exists or not, but I think it's funny that whenever a mystery sample is sent into a science lab, it most of the time "goes missing" or "never got there" or you don't hear back from the lab.
sweet vid man i absolutelelly love your vids, i used to just dismiss all this kinda thing, but i watched a vid of yours after it came up in suggestions the music, the facts and the look and feel had me hooked after one video, now i think their is at least a possibility for them, if not (some of the creatures) could veryu well e here, keep up the awesome work its rilliant!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is total bull shit. Whales, contrary to common belief, have a tiny stomach. A ten foot creature would not even partially fit in a whale's stomach.
@KevinsHope If what you are saying is true, then how is it that sperm whales have been documented diving to the bottom of the sea in order to consume giant squid, which are known to exceed lengths of ten feet?
@KevinsHope I know, dude! I hang out in whale stomachs all the time, and let me tell you, they are craaaaamped! You aren't able to stretch out for a good sleep...
Isn't it strange that tissue samples from possible cryptids that are sent to governmental 'scientific' agencies/laboratories are always lost or 'misplaced'?
I bet they're all filed away in the Smithsonian somewhere, right next to the lost ark.
@RBNightlinger I thought that was strange too. It probably shows that they had something real, but reasons as to why they felt they needed to hide it are in question. Maybe there's something about our planets past they don't want us knowing. Maybe everything we've been taught in schools is propaganda and is all part of some agenda. Knowledge is power, so without knowledge one is without power.
@GilbertSyndrome What if it was another of many facts that fly in the the face of the theory of evolution...? Is that what it was? Who knows, I'm not saying it's true. However that would give them an agenda to hide something. Knowlegde is power, so... How then do you take power away from the people? Deny them true knowledge. Our minds will accept any reality we're taught to accept. That's just a fact. I like to ask questions to and remain skeptical of anyone having any chance of an agenda.
Evolution is all but "officially" proven to anyone with at least half a brain... This cryptid would be no more of a threat to Christians than an ant or a flower, haha. Why ignore every other proof of evolution and hide what is essentially some sort of giant eel?
@GilbertSyndrome I use to think so to but it is correctly called the theory of evolution and not the law of evolution because it has yet to be proven so it remains a theory and takes faith to fill in the gaps. Therefore it's a religion in it of itself. Go ahead and believe it if you want to that's your free choice as a human being. I wouldn't ignore 'proof' of evolution (if there were any), I hope it is true, but the facts remain elusive.
Relativity is a theory, lots of things remain "theories." You have to be semi-retarded to think that evolution has flaws, it doesn't, there's a few missing pieces of the jigsaw but seriously, its all but "proven." If you did a little research into what we now know of evolution you'd be pretty much convinced, unless you're one of those folks who tends to believe in fairy tales...
@GilbertSyndrome You have to be retarded to think evolution doesn't have flaws. Do just a little research (without your preconceptions and already formed certainty on the subject) and you'll know there are big flaws. There is science to some evolution because micro evolution is real and provable. Macro evolution isn't proved with any concrete evidence. Its a blind leap of faith in the wrong direction. Think about it... all Earths life has evolved from a single & common micro organism?
A "theory" in science is something that is well-supported by evidence; it's much more than just conjecture or an educated guess. While it's not proven (not many ideas in science are "proven"), it's very well-supported. Arguing that "evolution is just a theory" demonstrates incredible ignorance and a total lack of common sense.
@GilbertSyndrome I'm just pointing out it isn't a fact and evidence won't ever arrive that proves that and so it will always be a theory, and it got there because it was a good theory that was halfway provable and true with micro evolution. It's just the next step to say we all come from a single organism is an idea that should be taught in a church because it's a belief. A theory really only means it works in our lives to apply this idea. We've been wrong about such certainty before.
Lots of things are not fact, the first thing anyone associated with science will tell you is that a "theory" within science is not the same as a hypothesis. Evolution is not a hypothesis, its a well established theory with literally mountains of evidence to support it, unlike some other "theories" out there such as... *cough cough* "intelligent" design. If you're a creationist or religious in any way then i see no point in debating this with you, sorry.
@GilbertSyndrome There's mountains of evidence for micro evolution not any for macro evolution. How is it so far fetched to think a more intelligent being made us? Use observable science here, doesn't it always take life to make life? Why then could not all life come from One divine life? You want to believe we came from the dumb & you have faith in that belief. I believe we all came from a divine being. If He made the universe He could form us out of the dust from the stars. Both take faith.
Its funny how you find the idea of evolution so far fetched but the idea that some omnipresent being sat in the ether and invented the world seems entirely plausible, haha. Micro and macro evolution is a term used by creationists clutching at straws. Evolution is Evolution. You can deny the reality of it all you like but it won't change the fact that there isn't a single, credible Scientist that uses the terms Macro or Micro in front of the word Evolution.
@GilbertSyndrome I've been on both sides of the argument. I've laughed at 'creationists' (whatever that word means. It just mean whatever preconceived notions you've been taught to feel it). God isn't too far fetched of an idea to believe in. In fact God makes more sense then all life coming from primordial ooze. Both take a leap of faith, 1 more then the other. When we die we'll see who's right. There r many creationist scientist but they don't let others know because of the ridicule.
Surely you know what the word means. If you think the notion of God makes more sense than life evolution then you're not actually seeking truth, as your profile page states. You're seeking something that you like the idea of, thats fair enough but its not based on anything except faith, evolution is based on evidence, not faith. Read up on Elysia chlorotica, the green sea slug. That's one of many examples of endosymbiotic lateral gene transfer that resulted in a new species.
@GilbertSyndrome To believe in macro evolution (and there is a scientific difference between micro and macro evolution) takes faith. It's your free choice to believe whatever you want to believe.
So, in your opinion, it takes "faith" to believe in something which is supported with vast amounts of evidence? haha, alright The fossil record provides countless examples of macroevolution over large amounts of geologic time. Different types of animals dominated different time periods through Earth history. "Macro" evolution is true. We have this ideal record of decent spanning thousands of species over more than a hundred million years, its not faith, its logic and education
@GilbertSyndrome Macro evolution isn't supported by any science buddy. 100 million years huh? So dogs and cats have a common ancestor along with human beings and horses? Is that what you actually believe? And you don't think such a belief takes faith? You need to do some research besides what you've been told in school. 60 yrs ago it was illegal to teach evolution in schools. It's popular because micro evolution is proven science and it helps to take God out of the equation. No God, no sin.
You've clearly been getting your education in some odd little church, haha. EVEYTHING on the earth share's DNA of some kind, we share 90% of DNA with chimpanzee's. Its you who needs faith, not me. Faith is a word that was created to explain the fact that you need hope to believe in something when there's no evidence. Micro evolution IS macro evolution times many many millions of years. Why're you wasting my time? You're not looking for any truth, you're looking for God.
@GilbertSyndrome No I went to public schools in phoenix, no religion involved at all. Actually humans and chimps have a DNA that's 98% similar not 90%, but you go ahead and believe we share a common ancestor without any evidence. Humans and horses have the same number of chromosomes so maybe we're related to them too. Micro evolution isn't macro evolution. Your last comment proves you're the one who is poorly educated. Go ahead and believe what you're told. God is truth.
Actually, modern advances have shown that it is 90% rather than anything more as the cell structure has been found to have diverged through time and the genus has split. But we still share the brunt of our DNA. You basically believe that there is a man in the sky whom you refer to as "He," thats a very medevil way of looking at things. You say "knowledge is power" yet you ignore truth. We didn't evolve from horses. Believe what you like, magic arks or divine beings, haha.
You've basically done what all uneducated religious types do, ignore every piece of fact and evidence that someone offers you and repeat the same tired bullshit over and over again, micro this and macro that. You're too blind to see that evolution is evolution and the evidence is all around you. It takes faith to believe in things for which there is literally no evidence (e.g.) God. Evolution is supported by vast amounts of evidence, its not my fault you're scared of the world
@GilbertSyndrome You're doing the same thing I'm doing, don't be a hypocrite. Easy with all the anger too it's not becoming of you. Evolution isn't evolution and you're too blind to see that, there's a difference between the 2. Just do research on it and you'll see many gaps in your precious theory. Hold fast to whatever you want because I really could care less. There isn't vast amounts of evidence for macro evolution. You can believe us and spiders share a common ancestor.
Why should i be angry? haha, i'm not, i'm just tired of bothering to reason with someone in denial. I've offered you many reasons why evolution is prevailent throughout the geology, geography and biology of the world and all you've done is deny it and offered me nothing to counter my claims except ill informed views. You tell me to do real research but i suspect you've been doing yours on Google while i've been doing mine within the many unniversities of England.
@GilbertSyndrome Well all the insults make you seem like an unhappy person. If you're tired of bothering with me then why do you still? Wow universities or 'unniversites' as you put it, of England... How prestigious. You clearly must know more then me who's never been. I've been on both sides of the argument and have laughed at people (in my more ignorant years) who didn't believe in the "vast" amounts of "proof" there is for evolution. One day I realized I was wrong, maybe you will too.
Nope, i love my life, i've got the love of a good woman, a job which pays well and takes me across the world, i've got my own charity which provides important training and education to young children in disadvantaged areas. I don't need a safety blanket and i love the world inwhich we live, Godless or not. Wow, haha, you're pointing out typo's? Well done, sir. Your comment about us and Spiders/Horses proves how uneducated you really are, we didn't evolve from either, unless you did.... ???
@GilbertSyndrome That's good, I love my life too. I didn't say we evolved from any animal, I said that you believe we share a common ancestor. Do you even read my comments or just wait for your turn to talk? That's good that you help out the needy, but why do it? It makes you feel good about yourself? That's no reason at all. Would you help the needy if you too were in poverty? Probably not. Times change and of whom much is given, much more is required. I hope you're giving them your all.
Nope, we're an entirely different species, our common ancestor is the ape, not the spider, obviously. Its been a long long time since we came out of the ocean. You can believe what you like, but without evidence you're basically hoping. There is 10X more evidence for evolution than there is for God, but you're trying to tell me that "He" is real and he invented the universe. Thats what i call "faith." I give to charity to give back to the community, thats none of your concern.
You seem like the negative one, you seem to be full of anger and doubt, not me. Now you're claiming if i didn't have money i wouldn't give to charity? haha, laughable. I'm not rich by any means, and yes, i did give to charity even when i didn't work. I used to box for charity and i will be boxing for charity again in September at the Adelphi hotel in Liverpool. Don't worry about my life, worry about your own. Times do change, and we no longer live in 1066.
@GilbertSyndrome Why do I seem like I have anger or doubt? You just said you have a job that pays well, I'm just saying if you didn't then you probably wouldn't be as charitable. Boasting that you're as good as your circumstances allow you to be isn't anything to brag about. Why do such charitable deeds if only to feel better about yourself? That is why you do it. Yes it helps others, but you feel better about you and that's the bottom line. I have nothing to worry about my friend. I'm golden.
I was charitable before i had a well paying job, so you're incorrect there. Charity is in the heart, not in the wallet. The fact that you're questioning something as simple as my charity tells me that you're a negative person, haha, you can't get around that. You seem bitter, funny how you claim to be searching for truth and yet you've denied all truth offered. You also said "knowledge is power" but you don't seem at all knowledgable about the facts of life, or my charity.
@GilbertSyndrome It all comes down to making you feel better about yourself. And you should, but that shouldn't be your main reason. You should never brag about doing charitable works, ever! If you do then you already have your reward. You're circumstance are good now but that will change and your kind acts along with it, unless you have a moral foundation founded on something greater then yourself. If you believe in good as an absolute then were does it come from, evolution? Did we evolve good?
My charity to inpoverished children stems from the fact that i was brought into the world with little, and i too, came from a disadvantaged part of the country. My charity to cancer foundations stems from my sadness at the loss of close friends and family to the illness. Not once do i consider giving to simply feel good about myself. You're clutching at straws, both with your assessment of me and with your opinions on "macro" evolution... That sir, is the bottom line.
"Did we evolve good?" That is a silly question, there is no good or bad. One mans "good" is another mans "bad." Our society has deemed what is considered good and what is considered bad. You're resting my case with each post you make, you don't seem to be looking for any truth, you seem to be looking for God, and i have to wonder why you need God so much. Maybe my opinion is right and you aren't as happy as you claim to be. Its not me that you should be questioning.
@GilbertSyndrome Like most people u'll agree that killing a child is evil. The people that do it still knw it's evil but they get a rush from it. 4 there 2b absolute evil 100% of us would have 2 agree on it. The 1's who kill children admit aloud there actions r evil so 100% of ppl would agree that such an act is evil. If there's absolute evil, there's absolute good. There's always a shared need 4 justice if some1 kills a child even if we never knew the child. U dnt believe in absolute good/evil?
Again, thats down to our morals, those morales didn't exist before society. Children are still raped and sometimes killed in many countries that don't share our view of right or wrong. Man wasn't born with the ability to see right from wrong, hence children getting into trouble a lot and having to learn what society deems to be acceptable or not. What is evil really? It changes from century to century.
@GilbertSyndrome Every1 agree's that murdering a child is wrong. Every1, even the people that do it. Everyone loves their own child, every1. Even murders love their own children. Even the people that kill their own children are sad about it because they loved them. Just because there's an absolute good doesn't mean that everyone would obey it. Just because some choose not to adhere to their feelings of good doesn't mean we all don't have them. Do you believe in any absolutes if not good or evil?
Thats not an accurate statement. Every "civilized" person agrees that murdering anyone is wrong. Some peope are not civil. Children have to be taught right from wrong at an early age. Even murderers love their own children? Thats an assumption, not a fact. I don't believe in good or evil, we make our own decisions on whats good and whats bad, we're fed stories as children to help us distinguish the good guy from the bad guy, but they're not always right...
@GilbertSyndrome We can still test out our actions everyday to see what is good or evil. Your emotions are real and let you know when something is good or evil. Intangible but real nonetheless. An idea is intangible but when put into action it produces something real. Good and evil are ideas but just because they're ideas doesn't mean that they're not real. You can believe there is no absolute good but that's a very shallow view to have because it means you're only as good as your circumstances
Good, bad, right and wrong vary from person to person, surely you understand that. Evil is a concept created by humans to attribute to all of the wrong doing in the world. Just like the Devil, its a symbol of all that is wrong with people, he's not a real person, sitting on a throne down in hell. What people consider as being wrong/bad/evil changes from generation to generation, based mostly on rules we've invented to keep order to society.
@GilbertSyndrome They may vary but for the most part everyone will agree on certain things being good or evil, surely you understand that. Evil isn't a concept created by man. When did we all agree that murdering a child is evil? Or have we had such views in us since birth? I believe the concept of good or evil are beyond our simple ideas of them. They've been around since the beginning of all things. Good comes from God and evil from the Devil. Man is capable of both.
Everyone agrees? What're you basing that on? Your neighbour? A friend at work? Do you know everyone? You're making an assumption there. What about children who were burnt or drowned as witches? That was wrong, but at the time it wasn't viewed as evil, infact, it was the church that sent them to death, they thought they were doing good. So you actually believe that there is a God and a Devil? Are you serious?
@GilbertSyndrome Yes I'm basing that claim on everyone I've seen or know. I'm basing that claim on the world I live in. Why do you think people are so mad at child murders? And are the people who are mad just a small percentage of the population or practically everyone if not everyone? We all can agree child murder is wrong, that it is an absolute evil. R u saying child murder isn't an absolute evil? Please if you're saying that be clear about it. Is child murder not an absolute evil?
@GilbertSyndrome Yes I'm basing that claim on everyone I've seen or know. I'm basing that claim on the world I live in. Why do you think people are so mad at child murders? And are the people who are mad just a small percentage of the population or practically everyone if not everyone? We all can agree child murder is wrong, that it is an absolute evil. R u saying child murder isn't an absolute evil? Please if you're saying that be clear about it. Is child murder not an absolute evil?
You're basing that on civilized people who you know, there's a difference. Tell me, what about the murder of many children by the church? Is that not evil? But if the church is good, then how can it do evil? The bible, if you've actually read it in all forms, speaks of many evils commited by God himself, so how does evil come from the Devil?
@GilbertSyndrome I'm sure everyone you know feels the same way. And everyone they know too. If not then you'd hear about someone who didn't feel the same way through the people you know. Same with me. Yes I'm basing that idea off of everyone I've ever known and everyone they've ever known. I've never heard someone tell me about a person who didn't think child murder was evil. No matter who murders children, even a church, it's still seen as an evil act. The catholic church isn't really christian
We both live in countries where people, young and old, are murdered every day. So, what about God, was/is he evil?
"This is what the Lord says: Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass .... And Saul ... utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword." (1 Samuel 15:3,7-8)
@GilbertSyndrome For a man to kill is a sin. If God gives a command to kill it may seem wrong to a man but God doesn't order us to kill for pleasure or gain. If those children who died by God's order were innocent then they're w/ God in heaven & can't even recall their physical deaths. God can give an order to kill because He is justified in all things & can give such an order but man isn't. It may seem wrong that children shld ever die but God gave such an order for a flawless reason.
Thats quite a hypocritical thing to say, so murder is an "absolute evil" unless God does it, inwhich case its fine? You seem to be basing this on things you've just made up to counter my argument, what're you basig this on? You said evil comes from the Devil:
If "God did not create evil" then what of the following?
Isaiah 45:7
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
@GilbertSyndrome It's hypocritical that you don't believe in the bible yet you use it in an attempt to strengthen your argument. If you don't believe in it then there is no God and therefore has ordered no one to kill. God gives commands to kill and tempt but He Himself kills or tempts no one. God's ways cannot be compared to mans. If God has a child put to death that child will be with God in heaven and God has actually done that child a great service. Death is a release from this burden.
@GilbertSyndrome Oh I doubt that. I've read that book many times and continue to do so even to this day. You however think it's just a bunch of fables. For me the bible is alive and personal. I love that book. To be honest I'd like to know how you came to such a false conclusion?
I've read the book for many years, i first read it when i was about 8 years old. Obviously i didn't understand it as much... but now i do. I know a lot about the bible, so you picked the wrong man to debate it with....
@GilbertSyndrome What makes you think I'm worried about debating you on biblical things. I never said you were wrong on any of your references to it. You're implying on the importance of things that don't really matter to me. I'm joyful that you've read the bible a lot and started when you were 8. I didn't start reading until I was 18. Do you still read it to this day? Do you accept it as God's one true doctrine for us to know Him by? That's really what matters, not who read it first.
When did i say you were worried? What do you think of the following?
"And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." -- Numbers 31:15-18
If this is Gods one true doctrine for us to know him by then God is a bit of a sadist, haha.
@GilbertSyndrome I never said that you said I was worried but you certainly implied that I should be because of your history with knowing the bible. I'm glad that you know about the bible and have read it. What do I think about those verses? I think God was rightfully punishing the disobedient. As far as the children go they're probably innocent and therefore are with God in heaven. If God is a sadist then that means He got pleasure from making others suffer but it didn't so He's not.
For me, there's too many inconsistancies and contradictions within the many pages of the bible for it to be based on much truth at all. I see it as more of a book of morals and lessons, not meant to be taken so literally, like... say.. the Grimms Fairytales. There didn't seem to be a whole lot of editing going on back then, haha, or someone might have noticed the contradictory claims and righted them. God is a bit of a sadist, i can name many weird examples.
@GilbertSyndrome I dnt c any inconsistencies in the bible. There r things that I had 2 research in order 2 get a better understanding but the bible is true & full of wisdom. I've found in life that whenever we have a problem w/ something God has done, is doing, or claims, it's b/c of our inability to completely understand God w/ our brains alone. A sadist is some1 who gets 'pleasure' from the pains of others. God doesn't get pleasure from any1's pain. Where in the bible does it say?
God seems to get a lot of pleasure from, shall we say "odd" places? A lot of his decisions seem very questionable aswell. You don't see any inconsistancies or contradictions?
Here's one: GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness. GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.
@GilbertSyndrome The light God made on day1 wasn't the Sun. There aren't inconsistencies in the bible. Anything that seems inconsistent is from our lack of understanding or something that got mixed up in its translation to English. 'God gets pleasure from odd places', like what? The old testament seems harsh at times but those were harsh times. The new testament is what most applies 2 us tday. If u have something against Christ & His teachings then there's something wrong w/ u, not Christ.
@GilbertSyndrome As God made Adam it was b4 all the other life on earth. Then the bible says God made Adam after all these things. I thought this was a contradiction as I 1st read it 2 but it's not. God made Adam pure & sinless, he was a son of God. When God made Adam after other life He was making Adam's body for a being that was no longer sinless & not a son of God but a son of man. It seems like God was making Adam twice & in a way He was. It's not a contradiction just a misunderstanding.
@GilbertSyndrome This is something that was mixed up in the bible's translation to English. Adam wasn't suppose to fall down dead the same day he ate the forbidden fruit but on that day he ate it death had Adam. There was no way (other then eating from the tree of life) for Adam to avoid death from then on. Cain's offering was not blood. God requires blood for a just offering to Him. Also (I know it doesn't mention this in genesis) Cain's heart wasn't focused on God as he made his offering.
The point is, God is supposed to be impartial, but in GE 4:4-5 it tells us that God prefers Abels offering and has no regard for Cains... on what planet is that considered as being impartial? Then again, the next "misunderstanding" may shed some light on Gods forgetfullness...
@GilbertSyndrome God's impartial w/ them who love Him. God's partial w/ men who dnt love Him. Cain seemed mean saying 'Am I my brothers keeper?' Cain's bad attitude is what made his offering unacceptable. Ur saying God shld've accepted Cain's sacrifice? Is that u saying God was wrong & not Cain? God told Cain 'If u do good will u not b accepted?' Cain instead murders his brother. God can b swayed 2 show more mercy on some1 who doesn't deserve it by the prayers of righteous men. It's not wrong.
Did you just decide who God is partial/impartial with? It doesn't say that anywhere, it clearly states that he's more partial to Abels offering and then later it clearly states that he's impartial, inconsistant. I'm saying that its a contradiction, how can you deny that?
Here's another:
EX 20:5, 34:7, NU 14:18, DT 5:9, IS 14:21-22 Children are to suffer for their parent's sins.
DT 24:16, EZ 18:19-20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.
@GilbertSyndrome I didn't decide anything. His characteristics r clear 2 those that love Him. I dnt knw what translation ur bible is but the reason y God didn't accept Cains sacrifice isn't detailed. It shows that after Cain seems 2 b kind of a jerk. Oh & a murder of his younger brother. 1 can assume he's lived his life in such away & therefore made his offering 2 God w/ contempt. The bible also shows that God tried to encourage Cain after He rejected his offering showing it was Cains error.
You did decide it, unless you can point me to the verse in particular which proves what you're saying with regards to impartiality. And again, where did you decide what children will inherit which sins? Show me the part in any verse or testament which states what you've just told me, i can't find it, all i can find are two seperate and contradicting claims, just like with the impartiality. You seem to be bridging these obvious gaps with your own guesswork, haha.
@GilbertSyndrome I'm just showing you what the bible says and how it's commonly accepted by other Christians as implying such messages. You can see it however you want that's your free choice God doesn't interfere with. I didn't decide what children inherit such sins I just said a child will (as we all do) have to confront the sins of the parents, it's biblical. If one has true faith in Christ they will have victory over all things (Exodus 20:5-6). The bible doesn't contradict itself.
But the bible doesn't say that, you're saying that. You even admit that its an implication that you're making here. You said the bible doesn't have any inconsistancies and yet i can name many of them, you're trying really hard to ignore these contradictions which is funny, because you discount proven evidence for evolution and yet you accept a book with literally contradicts itself hundreds of times as some sort of divine truth, is that not odd to you?
the thylocene for instance... the ceolocanth... sharks... crocs they all made it into the "modern day". So whose to say that a pre historic whale couldn't have?
Don't be such a stick in the mud u bible humping dork
Well first off, all those creatures you just mentioned are real and always have been, they were never in dispute, the fucking "Cadbrosaurus" has been made up, haha. I suppose you'll be telling me Bigfoot is alive and well in the backwoods of America next, being a master of stealth and evasion, haha. When they find one of these magical creatures you be sure to let me know...
Also, if you'd have bothered to read any of my comments you'd see i'm not religious at all, dork.
Its interesting watching you have to make implications and assumptions just to account for these obvious contradictions. Answer me this: Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
@GilbertSyndrome Any misinterpreting by u or any1 else on the bible can account 4 ur views of there being contradictions. It's a matter of perspective when it comes 2 what the bible says in vague verses. U have a mind against God so when u read the bible u look for things against it. Look for things that support it. 1 can say the bible says all manner of things, that's its power. 1Chron. 21:1-2 says Satan incited David. In job we c the Devil needs permission from God 2 do things. So indirectly.
So now you're making assumptions about what i see in the bible and about God? haha, i expect no less. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? (a) God did (2 Samuel 24: 1) (b) Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
@GilbertSyndrome I'm saying the bible can b twisted 2 fit many views. It has power that 1 can selfishly manipulate 2 say what they want 2 c. As far as the details go u can try 2 show me verses where the bible is contradicting itself but can u show me where it's wrong abt Christ? Where it's wrong abt His sacrifice 4 our sins? Cause that's all that matters. U won't understand the details until u have faith in Christ. The reverence of God is the beginning of wisdom. Faith in Christ is understanding
My point is that its riddled with hundreds of contradictions and you're telling me that it isn't, i have to wonder whether you know what the word "contradiction" even means. You're basically giving me the generic Christian denial that i'd expect. Its amazing how you claim to be a truth seeker and that you view knowledge as power when you clearly avoid any truth and create your own knowledge.
So who incited the count, God or Satan? In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
@GilbertSyndrome Much has been left out & lost in translation into English w/ the bible. So it's riddled w/ contradictions if u want 2 c them that way. I don't c them, I c 2 perspectives to a common story or something that isn't stated clear enough because of the 2 reasons I mentioned above. However is the bible not mainly for us to hear about Christ. That's what it comes down to is the story of our Messiah. That's the core of what really matters here. The devil tries 2 trip us up always, in us.
Its riddled with contradictions, but if you're so willing to ignore it all because you need the belief then thats what you'll do, you'll make any excuse to deny its problems. Its odd that you tell me how wrong i am about evolution because you think there's no evidence for "macro" evolution when there clearly is, and yet you go to such length to make excuses for why the bible isn't a book of inconsistancies. Its very telling, but there ya go.
Im going to have to agree with both of u dweebs... For one... the bible is a book of stories to be interpenetrated as each individual would intemperate them. there are stories of love, sex, aliens, ghosts, monsters... the devil is not a physical entity... he is a personification given so ppl can decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong... the bible is essentially a book of mythology... and why cant this be a pre historic whale.. its not impossible...
@GilbertSyndrome A child will inherit their parents demons if they repeat their same mistakes. A child won't inherit their fathers demons if they live a life w/ faith in Christ and bearing fruits worthy of repentance. This is the task we all have in our lives. None are immune, some just get victory over their demons & some don't. The Hebrew word used in place of 'child' actually means offspring. A child of a parent who's any age but a child of a parent nonetheless. Doesn't mean young children.
"... Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead with the edge of the sword and; also the women and little ones.... every male and every woman that has lain with a male you shall utterly destroy." (Judges 21:10-12)
when i said bible humper i was referring to ur stupid argument with the other guy...
and when i brought up those Known animals... such as the thylocine and the ceolocanth... they were thought to have been extinct uptil the 1800s... so who's to say that there isnt a prehistoric whale that survived along with all those animals... try and think a little bit
I am thinking a little, which is why i think its absurd. Have you seen prehistoric whale fossils? They look nothing like this, not even remotely. If i was going to say it was an offshoot of anything then it'd be an eel or a sturgon... even then it'd be a reach. There's absolutely no evidence of this whatsoever, pure nonsense.
@KevinsHope sperm whales eat gant squid witch are like 15 to 20 to even 25 feet long why couldnt it eat a 10 foot creature i think its completely possible
I always thought that Caddy was nothin more than a large form of fish, but then when I saw that illustration of that elongated seal, then I saw the similarities. awsome video!!
great vid just as good as your older ones the general presentation is great and the music you choose is always great and builds up to be suspenseful glad to see you'll be making vids again! can't wait!
signs soundtrack <3
mangasleejosh2 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from MichaelSGoldermann
Caddy!
hortulanus94 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from MichaelSGoldermann
I've been to one of the places were Cadborosaurus is sighted, Cadboro Bay. I tried to look for it, but I didn't see it. I think it's real, mostly because of the carcass found in the whales stomach. How much more proof do you need? You can't fake a carcass inside of a whale, you would have to feed it to the whale before it was killed, and we all know that's not going to happen, a whale is not going to eat a fake carcass. To see a video about another lake monster, go to my channel.
TheGardensOfPharoh 4 weeks ago
Gaint eels.
Leowen2 2 months ago
um..... that's a whales tail at 0.33 classic!
wigni227 3 months ago
mantra "om mani padme hum"
kyukenonythegreatest 4 months ago
I think this is a very likely candidate for the Nessie and Champ.
stralbem 5 months ago
music from the movie "Signs"?
watchJO3Y 5 months ago
A while back I thought this could be a prehistoric creature that hasn't been rediscovered yet and one of u went all Bible Humper on me.... however... I think It's a prehistoric shark.... the body is a perfect match to this....
Rare Prehistoric Shark found in Japan...
ChangelingsSiren 5 months ago
Comment removed
ronvnkl232 6 months ago
From what I've seen, Ogopogo is a Caddy. The DeMara video of Ogie above water looks exactly like the Caddy video shown on Discovery Channel's Alaska Monster Hunt in July.
pogsquatch 6 months ago
it reminds me of an oarfish......
snakeEyes4121 7 months ago
ancient sea horse? :p
alberthamidjr 7 months ago
I think i heard the 2 foremost experts on this animal (Paul LeBlond and Ed Bousfield) say it could be a mammal/reptile hybrid type animal.
sonofthedestroyer 7 months ago
i hate this music!!!!!
isabella8857 7 months ago
Man, the world really wants there to be a sea creature with a horse-like head and a long neck. Nessie started it in 1933- this continues it in 1937. I think it's probably some unidentified variety of fish, eel, whale. Nothing extinct or legendary. It's more reasonable to believe that the variety of our planet is not all documented than that dinosaurs still exist.
JW41926 7 months ago
@JW41926 nessie didnt start this in 1937,this was seen since the 1400's and was drawn by map makers(here be monsters) recently a trident tailed beast filmed off of florida seems to match a monster drawn on maps from the 1500's.
bobo007xx 7 months ago
i understand you are trying to make an entertaining video but that first case with the village and they found whale remnents in the stomach was proved just to be a basking shark it might not look like that but as they mature they change shape rapidly so make sure you get your facts right before you make a video but if you check your facts next time i will look forward to the next video
willyg63 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i believe these creatures exist, the world is full of mysteries you know... giant crabs, mammoths, prehistoric sharks they're all coming out one by one. :D
blizzardprince00 7 months ago
So that one episode on River Monsters about that guy's dad/friend, i don't remember, where his boat hit something big could be this "Caddy" they speak of? Man would love to see something like that.
Subsw00fers 7 months ago
Not really much actual evidence in this, and some of those pictures at around 4:45 are just lines of waves.
frostek 7 months ago
1. Giant squid do not have a bony structure. 2. The "tiny" stomach is only tiny in comparison to the body size. It is of several hundred gallon capacity, over 2500 liters, depending on age. 3. My dad caught tiger sharks 10 feet long, and that's not acutally very big, volume-wise or in weight. Probably less than 50 kilos, 110 lbs.
JRSchmuke 7 months ago
but discovery channel never showed this very important proof to the public!! why?? at first they said to show up soon but never did. two called dates of showing in the channel were removed and quitted.....! why??? many journalists and newspapers asked for this video to show officially to the public and every time discovery channel said:"well, soon...!" but until today they didn't.
maybe there is some really genuine proof and some "powerfull group" permitted discovery channel to show up...!!!?
seko24041973 9 months ago
in the "Nushagak Bay-Alaska" there was a group of some cadborosaur's recorded on video by a fisherman's son and the caddy group had a young one with them. they were hunted by a group of "Beluga-Whales"! two experts examined the video and told the video shows definitive a school of unknown species. once one animal looked into the camera and one animal tried to protect the little young one of the whales attacks. all this is clearly visible and the video was selled to "discovery channel"!
seko24041973 9 months ago
My video Cryptozoological Seals (Mammilan Sea Monsters) has a similar idea about the pinnipeds.
IndianaJ25 9 months ago
Cryptozoology novel about two boys who find something strange on the beach one night see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
I believe it might be an undiscovered large pinniped.
chaingangcommander41 11 months ago
Not saying that the Cadborosaurus exists or not, but I think it's funny that whenever a mystery sample is sent into a science lab, it most of the time "goes missing" or "never got there" or you don't hear back from the lab.
drumboy827 11 months ago
love ya videos, to hell with the disbelievers.....did you see the whole thing about the catching the so called chupacabra?
slappinyaface 1 year ago
where have you been
spartanhaloboy112 1 year ago
cool videos. you should do one on the wendigo( if I spelled it right) or the lizard man
vampireprincess648 1 year ago
I love that music!!! It keeps me in my seat and makes my heart beating faster. Thanks for sharing your excellente videos.
guillelazquez79 1 year ago
where do you get ur music?
videomaster098 1 year ago
are u gonna do one on the reopen and the thunderbird
raigekiman 1 year ago
sweet vid man i absolutelelly love your vids, i used to just dismiss all this kinda thing, but i watched a vid of yours after it came up in suggestions the music, the facts and the look and feel had me hooked after one video, now i think their is at least a possibility for them, if not (some of the creatures) could veryu well e here, keep up the awesome work its rilliant!
aysonator 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is total bull shit. Whales, contrary to common belief, have a tiny stomach. A ten foot creature would not even partially fit in a whale's stomach.
KevinsHope 1 year ago
@KevinsHope If what you are saying is true, then how is it that sperm whales have been documented diving to the bottom of the sea in order to consume giant squid, which are known to exceed lengths of ten feet?
MichaelSGoldermann 1 year ago 21
@MichaelSGoldermann Yeah, one giant squid was reported to be more than 80 feet long!
Peanutbutter585 7 months ago
@KevinsHope owned!
rcr1025 1 year ago 3
@KevinsHope I know, dude! I hang out in whale stomachs all the time, and let me tell you, they are craaaaamped! You aren't able to stretch out for a good sleep...
fishharp 9 months ago
@fishharp lmao @ ya comment.
kaeb27 8 months ago
@KevinsHope Umm.... wrong. Most whales have tiny throats, not tiny stomachs.
RBNightlinger 7 months ago
Isn't it strange that tissue samples from possible cryptids that are sent to governmental 'scientific' agencies/laboratories are always lost or 'misplaced'?
I bet they're all filed away in the Smithsonian somewhere, right next to the lost ark.
RBNightlinger 7 months ago
@RBNightlinger I thought that was strange too. It probably shows that they had something real, but reasons as to why they felt they needed to hide it are in question. Maybe there's something about our planets past they don't want us knowing. Maybe everything we've been taught in schools is propaganda and is all part of some agenda. Knowledge is power, so without knowledge one is without power.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
I would hardly believe that this supposed creature is some top secret part of an agenda, haha.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome What if it was another of many facts that fly in the the face of the theory of evolution...? Is that what it was? Who knows, I'm not saying it's true. However that would give them an agenda to hide something. Knowlegde is power, so... How then do you take power away from the people? Deny them true knowledge. Our minds will accept any reality we're taught to accept. That's just a fact. I like to ask questions to and remain skeptical of anyone having any chance of an agenda.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Evolution is all but "officially" proven to anyone with at least half a brain... This cryptid would be no more of a threat to Christians than an ant or a flower, haha. Why ignore every other proof of evolution and hide what is essentially some sort of giant eel?
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I use to think so to but it is correctly called the theory of evolution and not the law of evolution because it has yet to be proven so it remains a theory and takes faith to fill in the gaps. Therefore it's a religion in it of itself. Go ahead and believe it if you want to that's your free choice as a human being. I wouldn't ignore 'proof' of evolution (if there were any), I hope it is true, but the facts remain elusive.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Relativity is a theory, lots of things remain "theories." You have to be semi-retarded to think that evolution has flaws, it doesn't, there's a few missing pieces of the jigsaw but seriously, its all but "proven." If you did a little research into what we now know of evolution you'd be pretty much convinced, unless you're one of those folks who tends to believe in fairy tales...
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome You have to be retarded to think evolution doesn't have flaws. Do just a little research (without your preconceptions and already formed certainty on the subject) and you'll know there are big flaws. There is science to some evolution because micro evolution is real and provable. Macro evolution isn't proved with any concrete evidence. Its a blind leap of faith in the wrong direction. Think about it... all Earths life has evolved from a single & common micro organism?
uppercutter21 7 months ago
Comment removed
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
A "theory" in science is something that is well-supported by evidence; it's much more than just conjecture or an educated guess. While it's not proven (not many ideas in science are "proven"), it's very well-supported. Arguing that "evolution is just a theory" demonstrates incredible ignorance and a total lack of common sense.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I'm just pointing out it isn't a fact and evidence won't ever arrive that proves that and so it will always be a theory, and it got there because it was a good theory that was halfway provable and true with micro evolution. It's just the next step to say we all come from a single organism is an idea that should be taught in a church because it's a belief. A theory really only means it works in our lives to apply this idea. We've been wrong about such certainty before.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Lots of things are not fact, the first thing anyone associated with science will tell you is that a "theory" within science is not the same as a hypothesis. Evolution is not a hypothesis, its a well established theory with literally mountains of evidence to support it, unlike some other "theories" out there such as... *cough cough* "intelligent" design. If you're a creationist or religious in any way then i see no point in debating this with you, sorry.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome There's mountains of evidence for micro evolution not any for macro evolution. How is it so far fetched to think a more intelligent being made us? Use observable science here, doesn't it always take life to make life? Why then could not all life come from One divine life? You want to believe we came from the dumb & you have faith in that belief. I believe we all came from a divine being. If He made the universe He could form us out of the dust from the stars. Both take faith.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Its funny how you find the idea of evolution so far fetched but the idea that some omnipresent being sat in the ether and invented the world seems entirely plausible, haha. Micro and macro evolution is a term used by creationists clutching at straws. Evolution is Evolution. You can deny the reality of it all you like but it won't change the fact that there isn't a single, credible Scientist that uses the terms Macro or Micro in front of the word Evolution.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I've been on both sides of the argument. I've laughed at 'creationists' (whatever that word means. It just mean whatever preconceived notions you've been taught to feel it). God isn't too far fetched of an idea to believe in. In fact God makes more sense then all life coming from primordial ooze. Both take a leap of faith, 1 more then the other. When we die we'll see who's right. There r many creationist scientist but they don't let others know because of the ridicule.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Surely you know what the word means. If you think the notion of God makes more sense than life evolution then you're not actually seeking truth, as your profile page states. You're seeking something that you like the idea of, thats fair enough but its not based on anything except faith, evolution is based on evidence, not faith. Read up on Elysia chlorotica, the green sea slug. That's one of many examples of endosymbiotic lateral gene transfer that resulted in a new species.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome To believe in macro evolution (and there is a scientific difference between micro and macro evolution) takes faith. It's your free choice to believe whatever you want to believe.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
So, in your opinion, it takes "faith" to believe in something which is supported with vast amounts of evidence? haha, alright The fossil record provides countless examples of macroevolution over large amounts of geologic time. Different types of animals dominated different time periods through Earth history. "Macro" evolution is true. We have this ideal record of decent spanning thousands of species over more than a hundred million years, its not faith, its logic and education
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Macro evolution isn't supported by any science buddy. 100 million years huh? So dogs and cats have a common ancestor along with human beings and horses? Is that what you actually believe? And you don't think such a belief takes faith? You need to do some research besides what you've been told in school. 60 yrs ago it was illegal to teach evolution in schools. It's popular because micro evolution is proven science and it helps to take God out of the equation. No God, no sin.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
You've clearly been getting your education in some odd little church, haha. EVEYTHING on the earth share's DNA of some kind, we share 90% of DNA with chimpanzee's. Its you who needs faith, not me. Faith is a word that was created to explain the fact that you need hope to believe in something when there's no evidence. Micro evolution IS macro evolution times many many millions of years. Why're you wasting my time? You're not looking for any truth, you're looking for God.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome No I went to public schools in phoenix, no religion involved at all. Actually humans and chimps have a DNA that's 98% similar not 90%, but you go ahead and believe we share a common ancestor without any evidence. Humans and horses have the same number of chromosomes so maybe we're related to them too. Micro evolution isn't macro evolution. Your last comment proves you're the one who is poorly educated. Go ahead and believe what you're told. God is truth.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Actually, modern advances have shown that it is 90% rather than anything more as the cell structure has been found to have diverged through time and the genus has split. But we still share the brunt of our DNA. You basically believe that there is a man in the sky whom you refer to as "He," thats a very medevil way of looking at things. You say "knowledge is power" yet you ignore truth. We didn't evolve from horses. Believe what you like, magic arks or divine beings, haha.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
You've basically done what all uneducated religious types do, ignore every piece of fact and evidence that someone offers you and repeat the same tired bullshit over and over again, micro this and macro that. You're too blind to see that evolution is evolution and the evidence is all around you. It takes faith to believe in things for which there is literally no evidence (e.g.) God. Evolution is supported by vast amounts of evidence, its not my fault you're scared of the world
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome You're doing the same thing I'm doing, don't be a hypocrite. Easy with all the anger too it's not becoming of you. Evolution isn't evolution and you're too blind to see that, there's a difference between the 2. Just do research on it and you'll see many gaps in your precious theory. Hold fast to whatever you want because I really could care less. There isn't vast amounts of evidence for macro evolution. You can believe us and spiders share a common ancestor.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Why should i be angry? haha, i'm not, i'm just tired of bothering to reason with someone in denial. I've offered you many reasons why evolution is prevailent throughout the geology, geography and biology of the world and all you've done is deny it and offered me nothing to counter my claims except ill informed views. You tell me to do real research but i suspect you've been doing yours on Google while i've been doing mine within the many unniversities of England.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Well all the insults make you seem like an unhappy person. If you're tired of bothering with me then why do you still? Wow universities or 'unniversites' as you put it, of England... How prestigious. You clearly must know more then me who's never been. I've been on both sides of the argument and have laughed at people (in my more ignorant years) who didn't believe in the "vast" amounts of "proof" there is for evolution. One day I realized I was wrong, maybe you will too.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
Comment removed
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
Nope, i love my life, i've got the love of a good woman, a job which pays well and takes me across the world, i've got my own charity which provides important training and education to young children in disadvantaged areas. I don't need a safety blanket and i love the world inwhich we live, Godless or not. Wow, haha, you're pointing out typo's? Well done, sir. Your comment about us and Spiders/Horses proves how uneducated you really are, we didn't evolve from either, unless you did.... ???
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome That's good, I love my life too. I didn't say we evolved from any animal, I said that you believe we share a common ancestor. Do you even read my comments or just wait for your turn to talk? That's good that you help out the needy, but why do it? It makes you feel good about yourself? That's no reason at all. Would you help the needy if you too were in poverty? Probably not. Times change and of whom much is given, much more is required. I hope you're giving them your all.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
Nope, we're an entirely different species, our common ancestor is the ape, not the spider, obviously. Its been a long long time since we came out of the ocean. You can believe what you like, but without evidence you're basically hoping. There is 10X more evidence for evolution than there is for God, but you're trying to tell me that "He" is real and he invented the universe. Thats what i call "faith." I give to charity to give back to the community, thats none of your concern.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
You seem like the negative one, you seem to be full of anger and doubt, not me. Now you're claiming if i didn't have money i wouldn't give to charity? haha, laughable. I'm not rich by any means, and yes, i did give to charity even when i didn't work. I used to box for charity and i will be boxing for charity again in September at the Adelphi hotel in Liverpool. Don't worry about my life, worry about your own. Times do change, and we no longer live in 1066.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Why do I seem like I have anger or doubt? You just said you have a job that pays well, I'm just saying if you didn't then you probably wouldn't be as charitable. Boasting that you're as good as your circumstances allow you to be isn't anything to brag about. Why do such charitable deeds if only to feel better about yourself? That is why you do it. Yes it helps others, but you feel better about you and that's the bottom line. I have nothing to worry about my friend. I'm golden.
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
I was charitable before i had a well paying job, so you're incorrect there. Charity is in the heart, not in the wallet. The fact that you're questioning something as simple as my charity tells me that you're a negative person, haha, you can't get around that. You seem bitter, funny how you claim to be searching for truth and yet you've denied all truth offered. You also said "knowledge is power" but you don't seem at all knowledgable about the facts of life, or my charity.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
Comment removed
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome It all comes down to making you feel better about yourself. And you should, but that shouldn't be your main reason. You should never brag about doing charitable works, ever! If you do then you already have your reward. You're circumstance are good now but that will change and your kind acts along with it, unless you have a moral foundation founded on something greater then yourself. If you believe in good as an absolute then were does it come from, evolution? Did we evolve good?
uppercutter21 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
My charity to inpoverished children stems from the fact that i was brought into the world with little, and i too, came from a disadvantaged part of the country. My charity to cancer foundations stems from my sadness at the loss of close friends and family to the illness. Not once do i consider giving to simply feel good about myself. You're clutching at straws, both with your assessment of me and with your opinions on "macro" evolution... That sir, is the bottom line.
GilbertSyndrome 7 months ago
@uppercutter21
"Did we evolve good?" That is a silly question, there is no good or bad. One mans "good" is another mans "bad." Our society has deemed what is considered good and what is considered bad. You're resting my case with each post you make, you don't seem to be looking for any truth, you seem to be looking for God, and i have to wonder why you need God so much. Maybe my opinion is right and you aren't as happy as you claim to be. Its not me that you should be questioning.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Like most people u'll agree that killing a child is evil. The people that do it still knw it's evil but they get a rush from it. 4 there 2b absolute evil 100% of us would have 2 agree on it. The 1's who kill children admit aloud there actions r evil so 100% of ppl would agree that such an act is evil. If there's absolute evil, there's absolute good. There's always a shared need 4 justice if some1 kills a child even if we never knew the child. U dnt believe in absolute good/evil?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Again, thats down to our morals, those morales didn't exist before society. Children are still raped and sometimes killed in many countries that don't share our view of right or wrong. Man wasn't born with the ability to see right from wrong, hence children getting into trouble a lot and having to learn what society deems to be acceptable or not. What is evil really? It changes from century to century.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Every1 agree's that murdering a child is wrong. Every1, even the people that do it. Everyone loves their own child, every1. Even murders love their own children. Even the people that kill their own children are sad about it because they loved them. Just because there's an absolute good doesn't mean that everyone would obey it. Just because some choose not to adhere to their feelings of good doesn't mean we all don't have them. Do you believe in any absolutes if not good or evil?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Thats not an accurate statement. Every "civilized" person agrees that murdering anyone is wrong. Some peope are not civil. Children have to be taught right from wrong at an early age. Even murderers love their own children? Thats an assumption, not a fact. I don't believe in good or evil, we make our own decisions on whats good and whats bad, we're fed stories as children to help us distinguish the good guy from the bad guy, but they're not always right...
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome We can still test out our actions everyday to see what is good or evil. Your emotions are real and let you know when something is good or evil. Intangible but real nonetheless. An idea is intangible but when put into action it produces something real. Good and evil are ideas but just because they're ideas doesn't mean that they're not real. You can believe there is no absolute good but that's a very shallow view to have because it means you're only as good as your circumstances
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Good, bad, right and wrong vary from person to person, surely you understand that. Evil is a concept created by humans to attribute to all of the wrong doing in the world. Just like the Devil, its a symbol of all that is wrong with people, he's not a real person, sitting on a throne down in hell. What people consider as being wrong/bad/evil changes from generation to generation, based mostly on rules we've invented to keep order to society.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome They may vary but for the most part everyone will agree on certain things being good or evil, surely you understand that. Evil isn't a concept created by man. When did we all agree that murdering a child is evil? Or have we had such views in us since birth? I believe the concept of good or evil are beyond our simple ideas of them. They've been around since the beginning of all things. Good comes from God and evil from the Devil. Man is capable of both.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Everyone agrees? What're you basing that on? Your neighbour? A friend at work? Do you know everyone? You're making an assumption there. What about children who were burnt or drowned as witches? That was wrong, but at the time it wasn't viewed as evil, infact, it was the church that sent them to death, they thought they were doing good. So you actually believe that there is a God and a Devil? Are you serious?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Yes I'm basing that claim on everyone I've seen or know. I'm basing that claim on the world I live in. Why do you think people are so mad at child murders? And are the people who are mad just a small percentage of the population or practically everyone if not everyone? We all can agree child murder is wrong, that it is an absolute evil. R u saying child murder isn't an absolute evil? Please if you're saying that be clear about it. Is child murder not an absolute evil?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Yes I'm basing that claim on everyone I've seen or know. I'm basing that claim on the world I live in. Why do you think people are so mad at child murders? And are the people who are mad just a small percentage of the population or practically everyone if not everyone? We all can agree child murder is wrong, that it is an absolute evil. R u saying child murder isn't an absolute evil? Please if you're saying that be clear about it. Is child murder not an absolute evil?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
You're basing that on civilized people who you know, there's a difference. Tell me, what about the murder of many children by the church? Is that not evil? But if the church is good, then how can it do evil? The bible, if you've actually read it in all forms, speaks of many evils commited by God himself, so how does evil come from the Devil?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I'm sure everyone you know feels the same way. And everyone they know too. If not then you'd hear about someone who didn't feel the same way through the people you know. Same with me. Yes I'm basing that idea off of everyone I've ever known and everyone they've ever known. I've never heard someone tell me about a person who didn't think child murder was evil. No matter who murders children, even a church, it's still seen as an evil act. The catholic church isn't really christian
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
We both live in countries where people, young and old, are murdered every day. So, what about God, was/is he evil?
"This is what the Lord says: Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass .... And Saul ... utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword." (1 Samuel 15:3,7-8)
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome For a man to kill is a sin. If God gives a command to kill it may seem wrong to a man but God doesn't order us to kill for pleasure or gain. If those children who died by God's order were innocent then they're w/ God in heaven & can't even recall their physical deaths. God can give an order to kill because He is justified in all things & can give such an order but man isn't. It may seem wrong that children shld ever die but God gave such an order for a flawless reason.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Thats quite a hypocritical thing to say, so murder is an "absolute evil" unless God does it, inwhich case its fine? You seem to be basing this on things you've just made up to counter my argument, what're you basig this on? You said evil comes from the Devil:
If "God did not create evil" then what of the following?
Isaiah 45:7
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
So, evil does come from God.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome It's hypocritical that you don't believe in the bible yet you use it in an attempt to strengthen your argument. If you don't believe in it then there is no God and therefore has ordered no one to kill. God gives commands to kill and tempt but He Himself kills or tempts no one. God's ways cannot be compared to mans. If God has a child put to death that child will be with God in heaven and God has actually done that child a great service. Death is a release from this burden.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
To be honest, i probably know more about the bible than you do. Thats what i call "ironic."
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Oh I doubt that. I've read that book many times and continue to do so even to this day. You however think it's just a bunch of fables. For me the bible is alive and personal. I love that book. To be honest I'd like to know how you came to such a false conclusion?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
So, can you tell me about God condoning rape? Its in the bible, if you've read it then tell me what verse i'm talking about.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
I've read the book for many years, i first read it when i was about 8 years old. Obviously i didn't understand it as much... but now i do. I know a lot about the bible, so you picked the wrong man to debate it with....
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome What makes you think I'm worried about debating you on biblical things. I never said you were wrong on any of your references to it. You're implying on the importance of things that don't really matter to me. I'm joyful that you've read the bible a lot and started when you were 8. I didn't start reading until I was 18. Do you still read it to this day? Do you accept it as God's one true doctrine for us to know Him by? That's really what matters, not who read it first.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
When did i say you were worried? What do you think of the following?
"And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves." -- Numbers 31:15-18
If this is Gods one true doctrine for us to know him by then God is a bit of a sadist, haha.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I never said that you said I was worried but you certainly implied that I should be because of your history with knowing the bible. I'm glad that you know about the bible and have read it. What do I think about those verses? I think God was rightfully punishing the disobedient. As far as the children go they're probably innocent and therefore are with God in heaven. If God is a sadist then that means He got pleasure from making others suffer but it didn't so He's not.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
For me, there's too many inconsistancies and contradictions within the many pages of the bible for it to be based on much truth at all. I see it as more of a book of morals and lessons, not meant to be taken so literally, like... say.. the Grimms Fairytales. There didn't seem to be a whole lot of editing going on back then, haha, or someone might have noticed the contradictory claims and righted them. God is a bit of a sadist, i can name many weird examples.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I dnt c any inconsistencies in the bible. There r things that I had 2 research in order 2 get a better understanding but the bible is true & full of wisdom. I've found in life that whenever we have a problem w/ something God has done, is doing, or claims, it's b/c of our inability to completely understand God w/ our brains alone. A sadist is some1 who gets 'pleasure' from the pains of others. God doesn't get pleasure from any1's pain. Where in the bible does it say?
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
God seems to get a lot of pleasure from, shall we say "odd" places? A lot of his decisions seem very questionable aswell. You don't see any inconsistancies or contradictions?
Here's one: GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness. GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome The light God made on day1 wasn't the Sun. There aren't inconsistencies in the bible. Anything that seems inconsistent is from our lack of understanding or something that got mixed up in its translation to English. 'God gets pleasure from odd places', like what? The old testament seems harsh at times but those were harsh times. The new testament is what most applies 2 us tday. If u have something against Christ & His teachings then there's something wrong w/ u, not Christ.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
GE 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
GE 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.
GE 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created.
GE 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created.
GE 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created.
If these aren't inconsistancies then i have to wonder what they are... mistranslations? Really? Thats a bit of a struggling excuse...
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome As God made Adam it was b4 all the other life on earth. Then the bible says God made Adam after all these things. I thought this was a contradiction as I 1st read it 2 but it's not. God made Adam pure & sinless, he was a son of God. When God made Adam after other life He was making Adam's body for a being that was no longer sinless & not a son of God but a son of man. It seems like God was making Adam twice & in a way He was. It's not a contradiction just a misunderstanding.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
On the subject of Adam:
GE 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit.
GE 5:5 Adam lived 930 years.
What about this one:
GE 4:4-5 God prefers Abel's offering and has no regard for Cain's.
2CH 19:7, AC 10:34, RO 2:11 God shows no partiality. He treats all alike
Is this a misunderstanding, how so?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome This is something that was mixed up in the bible's translation to English. Adam wasn't suppose to fall down dead the same day he ate the forbidden fruit but on that day he ate it death had Adam. There was no way (other then eating from the tree of life) for Adam to avoid death from then on. Cain's offering was not blood. God requires blood for a just offering to Him. Also (I know it doesn't mention this in genesis) Cain's heart wasn't focused on God as he made his offering.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
The point is, God is supposed to be impartial, but in GE 4:4-5 it tells us that God prefers Abels offering and has no regard for Cains... on what planet is that considered as being impartial? Then again, the next "misunderstanding" may shed some light on Gods forgetfullness...
GE 6:6. EX 32:14, NU 14:20, 1SA 15:35, 2SA 24:16 God does change his mind.
NU 23:19-20, 1SA 15:29, JA 1:17 God does not change his mind.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome God's impartial w/ them who love Him. God's partial w/ men who dnt love Him. Cain seemed mean saying 'Am I my brothers keeper?' Cain's bad attitude is what made his offering unacceptable. Ur saying God shld've accepted Cain's sacrifice? Is that u saying God was wrong & not Cain? God told Cain 'If u do good will u not b accepted?' Cain instead murders his brother. God can b swayed 2 show more mercy on some1 who doesn't deserve it by the prayers of righteous men. It's not wrong.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
Did you just decide who God is partial/impartial with? It doesn't say that anywhere, it clearly states that he's more partial to Abels offering and then later it clearly states that he's impartial, inconsistant. I'm saying that its a contradiction, how can you deny that?
Here's another:
EX 20:5, 34:7, NU 14:18, DT 5:9, IS 14:21-22 Children are to suffer for their parent's sins.
DT 24:16, EZ 18:19-20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I didn't decide anything. His characteristics r clear 2 those that love Him. I dnt knw what translation ur bible is but the reason y God didn't accept Cains sacrifice isn't detailed. It shows that after Cain seems 2 b kind of a jerk. Oh & a murder of his younger brother. 1 can assume he's lived his life in such away & therefore made his offering 2 God w/ contempt. The bible also shows that God tried to encourage Cain after He rejected his offering showing it was Cains error.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
You did decide it, unless you can point me to the verse in particular which proves what you're saying with regards to impartiality. And again, where did you decide what children will inherit which sins? Show me the part in any verse or testament which states what you've just told me, i can't find it, all i can find are two seperate and contradicting claims, just like with the impartiality. You seem to be bridging these obvious gaps with your own guesswork, haha.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I'm just showing you what the bible says and how it's commonly accepted by other Christians as implying such messages. You can see it however you want that's your free choice God doesn't interfere with. I didn't decide what children inherit such sins I just said a child will (as we all do) have to confront the sins of the parents, it's biblical. If one has true faith in Christ they will have victory over all things (Exodus 20:5-6). The bible doesn't contradict itself.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
But the bible doesn't say that, you're saying that. You even admit that its an implication that you're making here. You said the bible doesn't have any inconsistancies and yet i can name many of them, you're trying really hard to ignore these contradictions which is funny, because you discount proven evidence for evolution and yet you accept a book with literally contradicts itself hundreds of times as some sort of divine truth, is that not odd to you?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome
the thylocene for instance... the ceolocanth... sharks... crocs they all made it into the "modern day". So whose to say that a pre historic whale couldn't have?
Don't be such a stick in the mud u bible humping dork
ChangelingsSiren 6 months ago
@ChangelingsSiren
Well first off, all those creatures you just mentioned are real and always have been, they were never in dispute, the fucking "Cadbrosaurus" has been made up, haha. I suppose you'll be telling me Bigfoot is alive and well in the backwoods of America next, being a master of stealth and evasion, haha. When they find one of these magical creatures you be sure to let me know...
Also, if you'd have bothered to read any of my comments you'd see i'm not religious at all, dork.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
Its interesting watching you have to make implications and assumptions just to account for these obvious contradictions. Answer me this: Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Any misinterpreting by u or any1 else on the bible can account 4 ur views of there being contradictions. It's a matter of perspective when it comes 2 what the bible says in vague verses. U have a mind against God so when u read the bible u look for things against it. Look for things that support it. 1 can say the bible says all manner of things, that's its power. 1Chron. 21:1-2 says Satan incited David. In job we c the Devil needs permission from God 2 do things. So indirectly.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
So now you're making assumptions about what i see in the bible and about God? haha, i expect no less. Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel? (a) God did (2 Samuel 24: 1) (b) Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome I'm saying the bible can b twisted 2 fit many views. It has power that 1 can selfishly manipulate 2 say what they want 2 c. As far as the details go u can try 2 show me verses where the bible is contradicting itself but can u show me where it's wrong abt Christ? Where it's wrong abt His sacrifice 4 our sins? Cause that's all that matters. U won't understand the details until u have faith in Christ. The reverence of God is the beginning of wisdom. Faith in Christ is understanding
uppercutter21 6 months ago
My point is that its riddled with hundreds of contradictions and you're telling me that it isn't, i have to wonder whether you know what the word "contradiction" even means. You're basically giving me the generic Christian denial that i'd expect. Its amazing how you claim to be a truth seeker and that you view knowledge as power when you clearly avoid any truth and create your own knowledge.
So who incited the count, God or Satan? In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Much has been left out & lost in translation into English w/ the bible. So it's riddled w/ contradictions if u want 2 c them that way. I don't c them, I c 2 perspectives to a common story or something that isn't stated clear enough because of the 2 reasons I mentioned above. However is the bible not mainly for us to hear about Christ. That's what it comes down to is the story of our Messiah. That's the core of what really matters here. The devil tries 2 trip us up always, in us.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Its riddled with contradictions, but if you're so willing to ignore it all because you need the belief then thats what you'll do, you'll make any excuse to deny its problems. Its odd that you tell me how wrong i am about evolution because you think there's no evidence for "macro" evolution when there clearly is, and yet you go to such length to make excuses for why the bible isn't a book of inconsistancies. Its very telling, but there ya go.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome Wow you said it all. What more needs to be said? To each his own my friend.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@uppercutter21
Im going to have to agree with both of u dweebs... For one... the bible is a book of stories to be interpenetrated as each individual would intemperate them. there are stories of love, sex, aliens, ghosts, monsters... the devil is not a physical entity... he is a personification given so ppl can decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong... the bible is essentially a book of mythology... and why cant this be a pre historic whale.. its not impossible...
ChangelingsSiren 6 months ago
@ChangelingsSiren I can assure you that Christ is very much alive and the story of Him coming and dying for all mankind's sins is very much real.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome A child will inherit their parents demons if they repeat their same mistakes. A child won't inherit their fathers demons if they live a life w/ faith in Christ and bearing fruits worthy of repentance. This is the task we all have in our lives. None are immune, some just get victory over their demons & some don't. The Hebrew word used in place of 'child' actually means offspring. A child of a parent who's any age but a child of a parent nonetheless. Doesn't mean young children.
uppercutter21 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, what about when God asks for the blood of the young? Is he evil?
"The Lord commands: "... slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women" (Ezechial 9:4-6)
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"... Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead with the edge of the sword and; also the women and little ones.... every male and every woman that has lain with a male you shall utterly destroy." (Judges 21:10-12)
So, is God evil or not?
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@GilbertSyndrome
when i said bible humper i was referring to ur stupid argument with the other guy...
and when i brought up those Known animals... such as the thylocine and the ceolocanth... they were thought to have been extinct uptil the 1800s... so who's to say that there isnt a prehistoric whale that survived along with all those animals... try and think a little bit
ChangelingsSiren 6 months ago
@ChangelingsSiren
I am thinking a little, which is why i think its absurd. Have you seen prehistoric whale fossils? They look nothing like this, not even remotely. If i was going to say it was an offshoot of anything then it'd be an eel or a sturgon... even then it'd be a reach. There's absolutely no evidence of this whatsoever, pure nonsense.
GilbertSyndrome 6 months ago
@KevinsHope sperm whales eat gant squid witch are like 15 to 20 to even 25 feet long why couldnt it eat a 10 foot creature i think its completely possible
Rasta19856 7 months ago
@KevinsHope you are an idiot.theres no hope for the tard known as kevins hope.;P
bobo007xx 7 months ago
I think it a Zeuglodon (Basilosaurus) descendant.What pinnapids(seals,sea lions,etc ) are totally aquatic?
yorubablk3 1 year ago
Woah...
bigfootisreal100 1 year ago
Seahorse!
N00bcrunch3r 1 year ago
i study cryptozooligy and i have to say your stuff is very impresive
Dvel28 1 year ago
you are the man u should be a cryptologist
aeromanT1 1 year ago
looks more of a camel head to me lol
Lauzon12 1 year ago
@Lauzon12 funnier if it was a camel's toe
banshee107 1 year ago
I always thought that Caddy was nothin more than a large form of fish, but then when I saw that illustration of that elongated seal, then I saw the similarities. awsome video!!
professordino1994 1 year ago
Finally, another video.
Great as always bro.
tributetolost 1 year ago
great vid just as good as your older ones the general presentation is great and the music you choose is always great and builds up to be suspenseful glad to see you'll be making vids again! can't wait!
Theweird0intheback 1 year ago
Finally a new one, interesting video
Eithiar192837465 1 year ago
Awesome!!!
EyeLikeMieVids 1 year ago
Love it!!!!
c0linaf 1 year ago
Sorry for the long wait. I'll be posting videos weekly so next Tuesday I will be uploading the newest episode. Enjoy!
MichaelSGoldermann 1 year ago 7
@MichaelSGolderman Yeah! Dude i love you're videos!
MightyZumba23 1 year ago
OMG! You have a new video thank you :)
ThornoftheRose1993 1 year ago
YESSS!! ANOTHER ONE OF THESE VIDEOS!!! thx man!
fafey1983 1 year ago