Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
the saturday before we taped 2 totally black helis circling the towers...when we went in to go to the sky deck the security guards practically threw us out bodily..they said 'powers off in both towers, come back next week'...we sold the footage in a network and they still have not aired it..
that is interesting...however, i dont know what that could be. It wasnt strong enough explosion to nock people out of the window but yet you clearly see some type of explosion or something. Also, that would be an interesting way to take down a building by explosives. Periodicly set some off? And if they were controlled how were the lines not cut when the plane crashed? Maybe, fire set them off? There are a lot of maybes we can agree on that. So in short, maybe we will never know?
Could've been the reaction between 1000 C molten aluminium (each plane had 30 tonnes) and water from the sprinkler system in the floors below the impact. It reacts very violently and produce hydrogen gas which could have caused the shock waves.
IM NOT AMERIKAN BUT TO SAY THIS IS A HELICOPTER RELECTION, TO ME IS STUPID... PUT YOUR SELF ON THE CAMERAMAN POSITION AND IF THAT PERSON WAS ACTUALLY ON THE HELIPTER IT IS IMPOSIBLE IT TO BE THE RELECTIONS BECAUSE IT GOES UPWARD TOO FAST AND IF THE GUY IS IN ANOTHER BUILDING AND IF THIS WERE AN HELICOPTER GOING AWAY OR TOWARD THE TOWER IT WILL STAY ON SOME OF THE WINDOWS AS IT GOES CLOSE OR AWAY THE TOWER
1. First off I aint no sheeple, and strongly believe that the Govt had adequate knowledge that these attacks were going to take place, and let them, and also did there part to make it so much worse then it would have been. Its just that I dont see any conclusive evidence in THIS video showing a shock wave, or explosions. What I do see is the reflection in a couple of windows of what I'm guessing is a helicopter because you can hear it in the background.
If you look closely, you can see someone waving something out of a window just above and to the left of where the first plume of smoke is coming from the building. seconds before the "explosion"/"reflection" they stop waving whatever it is, you see the "explosion"/"reflection", and the "explosion"/"reflection" stops just under where this person was waving whatever it was... hmmmm....
@ijuststoledurvideo dude, are you serious? you wouldn't be able to make out the obvious reflection of a hellicopter going by on a clear day... because there are too many gaps between the windows, plus the distance from the ground to the building would obstruct it further...ANNNND, if you notice the "reflection" moves in an upward motion...not saying choppers dont have this ability.
some type of high tec explosives were used to bring these buildings down. there are some seriously smart folks behind 9/11. it certainly was NOT A MAN IN A FUCKING CAVE!!!!
present day comparison: if anybody watched the casey anthony trial, the defense repeated over and over, reasonable doubt. question: is there any reasonable doubt that osama bin laden ordered al qaeda to carry out 9/11?
@12Weasel OHH so that's when they installed all the Thermate ! Wow I thought they would have installed it aand used it right away but you are right . It would take much longer to plan this major scam as 911
they had to do tests and make sure it looked good . It still looked pretty fake though ! I remember thinking
"How will they explain all the charges it would take to implode that building ?"
@CClaudio21 stop at 21 seconds and tell me that. look at the far left window ..its virtually the SAME as the window above it.....which i am sure we can agree is blown out. or are you gunna be ignorant enough to dispute that too? not to mention i find it hard to believe that a helicopter reflection moves up one side of a building and not horizontally? or was the helicopter flying straight up - perfectly parallel to the window sequence of the WTC?
@CClaudio21 haha yah apparently numerous videos of detonations and the ONLY 2 scientific studies done on the WTC steel that both turned up nanothermite- which has no other way of showing up other than demolition. wow. you shoulda been on the jury in the Casey Anthony trial- apparently evidence doesnt mean shit to you asshole.
@1buckdawg Hmmm so show me the damn study where it shows nanothermite dipshit. I have seen NIST's report (No traces of chemicals like thermite present) and find them credible because they are a group of chemists and engineers with years of experience. And you probably are not.
@CClaudio21 name calling aside, for you to report NIST as a valid source is pretty bad. Even the most prominent "terrorist theory" supporters admit the NIST report is garbage. Even the NIST employees admit it is largely flawed. Also, the NIST website claims "NIST did not test for the residue of these (Thermite/sulfer) compounds in the steel- because it would have required a very large quantity"....so aside from not testing- the theory that it would take a lot has also been debunked. NIST FAILED
@CClaudio21 and for the nanothermite evidence all you have to do is youtube search "Neils Harrit Nanothermite"- tons of videos about it. The second study was done by "Steven Jones Nanothermite"......so what im telling you is that the only 2 studies done on the the dust/steel both showed up nanothermite. NIST did not due a study because it would have required "too much explosives"....which has also been debunked. Not to mention John Kerry himself admitted they were demolitioned.. ill keep goin
@CClaudio21 yah. all the evidence i put forth and all you can do is call me an idiot. Typical.. great strategy. you should be on a debate team. thanks for your complete absence of evidence! great chat.
@1buckdawg No, all you are doing is pointing at videos that claim to put forth evidence which isn't even there or is misconstrued. That is why you are an idiot.
@CClaudio21 oh yah? how bout those two factual based studies that i talked about with Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies. You do know what "peer reviewed" means, dont you?? And Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen- Department of Chemistry. He is an expert in nano-chemistry.......both these men found nanothermite in their studies. show me a study that analyzed rubble/WTC and didnt find thermite. I'm sure im still an idiot!
@1buckdawg You didn't tell me about those, I have heard about those studies and I also know that NIST had to review it's report as a result and still did not have to change anything because they did not find any nano thermite.
@CClaudio21 yes if you scroll through all my comments below you will see i did mention those. and NIST did not test for thermite/nanothermite.sulfur....so that argument of yours is invalid. FROM NIST WEBSITE "NIST did not test for the residue of these (Thermite/sulfer) compounds in the steel- because it would have required a very large quantity"....so aside from not testing- the theory that it would take a lot has also been debunked. NIST FAILED
@EeJLP Reflection of your stupidity, there's a high quality version of this clip on my channel and it shows clearly that there are non reflective curtains on these windows, these curtains are then blasted by a shockwave that is ripping through the building, you can even seen the different parts of the curtain and their lines. Nice one you idiot, and people wonder why they were able to get away with this. Because idiots like you can't USE YOUR OWN BRAIN when dealing with something you can fathom.
@EeJLP No it is not, the window blinds are being pushed by a blastwave, the very second the flash occurs, white smoke starts to billow out from the windows, and 5 seconds later the smoke disappears. And I have the HQ version of this on my channel, 2 people instantly react to these flashes.
And window blinds are not reflective, they obviously did not reflect the blue sky so why the hell would they reflect a hellicopter and why would would it go straight up. You gota be stupid to believe that.
@Xendrius You are officially retarded in my book. The blinds did not reflect the light, The glass did. The helicopter was close and was sucking the air towards it, and pulling the smoke out. The people probably were reacting to the helicopter thinking they could be saved. The helicopter did not go straight up the rest of the windows had the reflection blocked from the heavier smoke coming from the higher windows across to the south.
@MegaYeshua33 Then you need some fricking glasses, look at the damn windowss, they are NOT reflective, the glass is not there, the window blinds are, and you can see the damn lines of the blinds, each small individual section, you are either a liar, or stupid, in any way, it does not matter what you believe, does not change facts.
@Xendrius They are to reflective. They are tinted and on the shaded side of the building, and on a serious angle from the camera. They are also multi pane windows. When I did curtain walls you could tell the outside of the window pane with a lighter. if it reflected multiple flames it was the outside. Thats why it looks distorted.
1. You can hear a, or multiple helicopters. Unless someone is mowing their lawn at 1200ft. Helicopters also have the ability to fly, including upward.
2. "Shock waves form when the speed of a gas changes by more than the speed of sound." The speed of sound is ~1112ft/s at 1000ft. This reflection is moving at maybe 2 floors per second or ~20ft/s.
3. It reflects off of non-broken windows. The flat grey, non-black or smoke-emitting ones and it doesn't reflect off of broken, smokey windows.
you guys need to look up "bob and bri" videos of flashes. The Zionist US government didnt manage to confiscate them before it was uploaded. It shows amazing visual evidence of a controlled demolition and its scary
@crazyknight2008 That's what thought i too. There's definitely other video that shows flashes, and streamers from the super thermite reactions, however.
@ninjasaiden you cannot "debunk" the natural laws of physics so i think my comment destroys your comment.
@rangerbelt ill try again. what part of a plane crash, fire, or gravity will make a building turn to dust? also, what part of a plane crash, fire, or gravity will make that dust be expelled outward? fire burns, it does not expel. gravity has one component, down, so it did not make the dust expel outwardly. i await an answer.
PAGE672--The second tower was hit much lower and had a lot more weight on it and the steel did not have to weaken as much as the first tower because the weight pressing down on the damaged structure helped it fall sooner. Also the building was hit in a different spot--a whole corner was weakened, hence it fell off to the side rather than straight down like the second collapse. Also Mr. Silverstein had mortgages on the buildings and he ended up with a big loss. Try again.
@Rangerbelt Oh buddy buddy...how could the weight of the upper floors collapse the bottom floors if they were already toppling over? If the building collapsed so easily - as if no core column resistance at all, then it would've been a construction error and Silverstein's insurance wouldn't coughed over a single penny. He didn't win as big as some ppl think but he did avoid a huge renovation bill - removing the asbestos. Plus the ability to rebuild.
Good God, you morons that just will not let go of the fact that a plane entered the building and blew away much of the fireproofing and then heated the steel until it weakened(NOT MELTED ) and then it could not hold the weight of the building and it collapsed. Does not take a rocket scientist to understand that . Geesh.
@Rangerbelt How did the second tower to get struck by a plane fall sooner then the first one. The second plane had hotter burnig fuel?! Think for yourself and ask one simple question, Who had benefitted the most from that day? Get that answer and who find who is responsible!!!! Larry Silverstein (owner of towers) made 7 billion dollars that day, our military took over one of the biggest oil countries in the world, Sadam dead, al queda not real, so who benefitted the most?!
@Rangerbelt okay smartie pants . explain to me the pools of molten metal in the basements of 1,2 and 7. explain to me why the fires there couldnt be put out for MONTHS.
@mandeemarie03 Hahaha just because the fires couldnt be put out for months doesnt mean it was explosives. If you knew anything about explosives you would know that they are not fire based they are more of a pressure based reaction. The molten metal could be from a number of things. Airplanes are made of Aluminum and the towers collapsed with the plane inside of them. Aluminum can melt even at low temperatures you can prove this by throwing a soda can into a camp fire and will get the same thing
Have you ever melted aluminum? If you did, you would surely know that molten aluminum doesn't look like molten steel. Anyways, the leading theory is that there was some kind of thermyte used, not just explosives, hence their explanation to the fires and high temperatures. I don't buy that theory, but something is very bad explained in this case.
@Eodweard Have you ACTUALLY melted Aluminum to a suitable heat? If you did and you paid attention during Science 101 you would know that anything heated to a suitable level that does not first evaporate or consume will emit radiation or light. This light or colour will change in the electromagnetic spectrum as the object's heat rises. Due to peculiarities of human colour perception we see heated objects as Red-Orange-Yellow-White-Blue. No object is excempt from this law including Aluminum.
No I didn't, I just saw aluminum melting at home foundries fuelled by propane. Perhaps you're right, because *even* if thermyte was used I guess that's very improbable that it would make iron pour that way from the towers. As I said, I don't buy conspiracy theories, as I don't buy what the official report says. My opinion is that this (the WTC attacks) was a huge event with a very shallow investigation, that's why there's so much doubts and theories.
@Eodweard Thats cool, l can tell your a reasoning person, refreshing after dealing with truther logic. l even have people swearing that the planes were holograms :)
Thanks. I see people nowadays tend to defend theories tooth-and-nail without questioning much, in both sides...and that's a shame, because sticking as close as possible to reality would turn matters less difficult to discuss.
It's light reflecting on the building/windows...a shockwave is not light, and would not be visible inside the building, nor would it be visible on this low quality video
In order to see a shockwave, you need a clear high-speed video
What is funny is all of act like brainwashed commies. You claim all this 9/11 bullshit but you have no proof. Of course things are odd but their is no proof. Every time you lecture someone about your theory on NWO and all that fake bullshit is always different. If we disagree with you. You shove it down our throats or insult us. I sure as fuck know who the real brainwashers are it's you left-winged whacked jobs. Now I can agree being against the govt but the shit people say these days.
It's not actual flashes but the window blinds moving from the shockwaves of the explosives going off between the window joints and the wall from within the corner supporting infrastructure of the building.
Why is it that i cant see the flash when it goes over the broken windows, seems more like a reflection of the Helicopters, really look at it closely, u never see the flash coming from the broken windows
btw, the engineering behind the WTC was ground breaking technology that had never been used before, and i cant recall many/if any instances it has been used since.. find me a building that doesnt have support collumns in the middle of their floor plates, only on the outside edge of the building, and the core.. that is the reason youve never seen a steel building collapse like the WTC before, or since 9/11.
@yourockjustintube when the towers were built, they said these buildings could withstand UP TO a Boeing 707 impact.. which was most likely only at cruising speed, as no plane ever goes full speed at that low of an altitude, or that close to possible landing/take off. keep in mind the 707 is a much smaller plane than the 767's, and has much smaller fuel tanks..
buildings were blown up. these government and elite are out of their stupid minds. part of it is our inability to live under this shadow. who wants to do business with these people? they really really blew it in more ways than one.
That's absolutely charges going off from the bottom to the top. Look at the additional smoke afterwards and directly afterwards everyone disapears. White smoke = thermite thermate what ever you want to call it!
@TheBelldiver dumb shit, i get white smoke when I light up a cigarette, and when I burn paper and stuff like that, and no, they were not charges, where were the sounds of the explosions if that's the case, it was just wind you Bellend
Yes, the blinds do look to be down. I can see the ruffling. I also see the arm of the person on the corner retract as it passes be as if he's regathering himself from a jolt.
First off, it being a reflection is ridiculous. Second, the blinds are on the INSIDE of these windows and it would be very very difficult for the chopper's wind-force to be affecting them from inside. And last, but not least, which backs up my second point is.................how can a chopper's wind-force affect these blinds behind the windows to move and NOT affect the smoke that is pouring out? Also, how can the blinds be affected only by a chopper's wind-force and NOT the natrual high winds?
.........Helicopter?...........Are you sure you're seeing what's being pointed out??? How 3 flashes/explosions moving up the corner of the building can be mistaken for a helicopter is beyond me.
Conspiracy theorists and idiots alike its a reflection of helicopter. Just a thought Elvis is dead, we landed on the moon, Oswald killed Kennedy, Hurricane Katrina wasn't a government weapon and terrorists were responsible for 9-11. You guys must think I'm a real nut job, huh?
its kinda iffy, cuz it does look strange , but to me looked like people were closing windows,but im not sure how building was set up..but i also saw ppl still in windows that were not efected....so who can say 4 sure...oh yeah bush knows!
no they are not kidding. the government sheep have lost any ability to think at all.they are mindless zombies with media dictating to them what to think.all believers of the official story need to die right now. to not have the capability to think means you have no reason to live.science curses you all.drop dead you fucking mindless pieces of shit.george bush is guilty of crimes against humanity.
you accuse me of being retarded. well then please explain why you think that? where am i wrong? the u.s. citizens know for a fact the u.s. government lies, and still accepts everything the u.s. government tells them, including that 19 muslims with boxcutters defeated the u.s. military 4 times in the course of an hour and 20 minutes. i await your answer...
@alt132000 Brother Bush was head of security at the Twin Towers where there had been a renovation project underway for months . How do you like that ?
@alt132000 Ok dipshit... answer this. You know how Bush was in power for only about one year at the time... Right?? How the fuck could he possibly plan all of this in less than a year?? Something like this would take years of planing... Second of How the fuck dare you talk like that just because of other peoples opinions. If anything, you should be the one dropping dead now.
I don't think this could look any more like reflections in the windows (especially in slow motion). Do people honestly believe that this video shows flashes from demolition charges? Even if I believed that 9/11 was an inside job I would argue against this one. This is just embarrassing.
The men who did this as an inside job are ruthless *ssholes.
They worship the Talmud which praises them for doing evil for personal profit.
Bush said in a press conference, the plan was to trap people in the upper floors so they could not escape. Who gave Bush that information? He has not revealed that name to us. Someone knew that the plan was to trap people in the upper level. Don't tell me Bin Laden planned to trap people in the upper level.
Yeah, i've never heard of a steel framed building collapse due to fire, but then again, i've never heard of a jumbo jet full of fuel crash into a building either. And btw, if the government wanted to destroy one of our buildings as an excuse to go to war, why would they decide to destroy the buildings that are the center of our economy and the pentagon, which is the center of our defense??? Not to mention, what was the point of crashing the plane in Pennsylvania? Grow up 82thadangerous1.
actually if you pause it at around 20 seconds you can clearly see that it is a reflection of a police helicoptor. And it is obviously extrenal as there is no change in the building structure during the "flashes" open your mind 82th, see the reality of a terrorist attack, not the fantasy of the misnamed truth movement.
ummm nope, since you aren't a very dangerous 1, just took taht off. Please look how you spell your name. Also, you have no sense of physics, please refer to the concpet of potential energy. Outside job, you lunatic
What does my name even have to do with it? And laws of physics would tell that these buildings would've taken much longer to collapse like they did. Instead of nearly freefall speed, around 10 seconds, it should have taken atleast 20-25 seconds with the resistance of each floor, like we were told. ATLEAST. Call me a lunatic all you want, but don't tell me how to spell my name when you just put 'taht' in your response. Idiot.
I'm not claiming, I'm informing. If there was resistance it would've taken significantly longer. It might not have been EXACTLY freefall speed, but there was no resistance.
Dude, seriously. Can you have an open mind? Can you not be held on a leash by our government? Everything you've said to me is false. No steel building before or after 9/11 collapsed due to fire. The fire was not strong, considering people above it's harshest point were able to get below it and escape. WTC 7 fell for absolutely no reason, while buildings that were weaker and closer to the towers maintained their steel frames. Try, just try to realize that 9/11 was way more than it seemed.
So what! The building was on fire. You are going to have explosions!!! HELLO MCFLY, IS THERE ANYONE HOME? Hummmm lets take something much smaller like a CAR! have it burn for a while and BOOM it will explode DUH! Give me a break.
This was an OFFICE building, not a car. A car would go boom because of gasoline. What sort of materials would be in the upper, middle, lower and basement levels of an office building to cause ALL those explosions that were heard by reporters, first responders and civilians? Nano-thermite is real. Look it up. And don't forget to get your flu shot.
OMG, REALLY? This is all you are bringing to the conversation? What about your claim that "so many fucking things could have caused this besides this "Nano-thermite?" Again, please enlighten me as to what could have possibly happened to obliterate three steel framed buildings?
nano thermite is added to a HE..it's never going to act as a high explosive by itself ...and additionally there is no point even using nano thermite. u don't need thermobaric or extremely powerfull he to do this, pbx around the frame will do it.
just thinkin, concrete explodes when it's heated up. The small amount of water in it creates a sort of steam bomb with a HUGE explosion. I'm not sayin it's the cause of the flashes in this video, but it is of course a material in those floors as well as all over the building that could have caused some of the exposions those people heard.
cars are filled with gasoline. the explosion would only happen when the fire came in contact with flammable substances. are you saying that several explosions occurred on different floors, in sequence demo charge pattern, by coincidence?!? LMAO!! coincidence theories are for people that cant grasp simple concepts.
Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center. He is interviewed on danish TV2 News.
New york owns this and new jersey finding they bought an insurance policy for 65 billion dollars before these homemade missiles look like planes were hit staged an accident wackos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!in with Florida with brevard county florida so was the Pentagon was told to get out cops howse its their howse
The insurance 1992 their family here in indialantic florida found out about the insurance on the towers not me at all mental health order their family was crazy conspiracy were unaware of any conspiracy until now
This insurance company in florida an new york verififed this was an accident and the owners could collect 65billion dollars for the staged accidents more accidents wackos child molesters and coke heads are having a lot of snort need this when they molest boys need cocaine how much of it in florida
It looks like something is being blasted up that corner column.
xander7ful 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
/watch?v=8DPkBqe-Wfc&list=PLBBA7A3240F8DFD6E&index=98&feature=plpp_video
MegaYeshua33 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
/watch?v=8DPkBqe-Wfc&list=PLBBA7A3240F8DFD6E&index=98&feature=plpp_video
MegaYeshua33 1 week ago
Here is the high quality version uncut, or tampered with by truthers. If you look closely you can see the blinds are up in most of the windows with the reflections. Also if you watch the whole thing you can see that the smacks are bodies hitting the ground.
/watch?v=8DPkBqe-Wfc&list=PLBBA7A3240F8DFD6E&index=98&feature=plpp_video
MegaYeshua33 1 week ago
the saturday before we taped 2 totally black helis circling the towers...when we went in to go to the sky deck the security guards practically threw us out bodily..they said 'powers off in both towers, come back next week'...we sold the footage in a network and they still have not aired it..
repelghosts 3 weeks ago
doesn't look like a reflection. looks like shutters and windows are actually impacted/blasted.
Myaucat 1 month ago
Videos like this make the facts of 9/11 truth seem Crazy conspiracy theories.
velo50 3 months ago
FUCK YOU BUSH
nb45001 4 months ago
Advanced engineering. That shock wave was subtle.
firesong888 4 months ago
That is the reflection of a helicopter flying past. People are still standing in the windows next to the "explosions".
jtkirkfan2002 5 months ago
people the 85 pentagon cameras that were not shown to us are the proof that there is something wrong with 911 official story
zelenko2 5 months ago
That's a reflection, not a flash. People, get a life!
MGR1900 5 months ago
@MGR1900 those poor people had a life before their government murdered them
choclatesaltyballz 5 months ago
that is interesting...however, i dont know what that could be. It wasnt strong enough explosion to nock people out of the window but yet you clearly see some type of explosion or something. Also, that would be an interesting way to take down a building by explosives. Periodicly set some off? And if they were controlled how were the lines not cut when the plane crashed? Maybe, fire set them off? There are a lot of maybes we can agree on that. So in short, maybe we will never know?
ufailpwn 5 months ago
Could've been the reaction between 1000 C molten aluminium (each plane had 30 tonnes) and water from the sprinkler system in the floors below the impact. It reacts very violently and produce hydrogen gas which could have caused the shock waves.
kjaks 5 months ago
IM NOT AMERIKAN BUT TO SAY THIS IS A HELICOPTER RELECTION, TO ME IS STUPID... PUT YOUR SELF ON THE CAMERAMAN POSITION AND IF THAT PERSON WAS ACTUALLY ON THE HELIPTER IT IS IMPOSIBLE IT TO BE THE RELECTIONS BECAUSE IT GOES UPWARD TOO FAST AND IF THE GUY IS IN ANOTHER BUILDING AND IF THIS WERE AN HELICOPTER GOING AWAY OR TOWARD THE TOWER IT WILL STAY ON SOME OF THE WINDOWS AS IT GOES CLOSE OR AWAY THE TOWER
JoseGtassh 5 months ago
@JoseGtassh COMMON SENSE PEOPLE PLAY NO POLITICAL IDIOLOGY
JoseGtassh 5 months ago
the explosions are seen from the bottom to top
CaptCamping 5 months ago
1. First off I aint no sheeple, and strongly believe that the Govt had adequate knowledge that these attacks were going to take place, and let them, and also did there part to make it so much worse then it would have been. Its just that I dont see any conclusive evidence in THIS video showing a shock wave, or explosions. What I do see is the reflection in a couple of windows of what I'm guessing is a helicopter because you can hear it in the background.
ijuststoledurvideo 5 months ago
If you look closely, you can see someone waving something out of a window just above and to the left of where the first plume of smoke is coming from the building. seconds before the "explosion"/"reflection" they stop waving whatever it is, you see the "explosion"/"reflection", and the "explosion"/"reflection" stops just under where this person was waving whatever it was... hmmmm....
NASCARGUY51139 5 months ago
That's some nice evidence
dobberdoss 6 months ago
WTH is this video about? All I see is the reflection in the windows of a helicopter flying by
ijuststoledurvideo 6 months ago
@ijuststoledurvideo agreed. you can even hear it.
craig17121 6 months ago
@ijuststoledurvideo dude, are you serious? you wouldn't be able to make out the obvious reflection of a hellicopter going by on a clear day... because there are too many gaps between the windows, plus the distance from the ground to the building would obstruct it further...ANNNND, if you notice the "reflection" moves in an upward motion...not saying choppers dont have this ability.
NASCARGUY51139 5 months ago
some type of high tec explosives were used to bring these buildings down. there are some seriously smart folks behind 9/11. it certainly was NOT A MAN IN A FUCKING CAVE!!!!
thebluetarp 6 months ago
BTW that white smoke is coming directly from the thermite reaction...
alecboi84 6 months ago
i thought that was like an elevator
jeffpark1118 7 months ago
@jeffpark1118 Cannot to be an elevator. Elevators were inside the tower, at the central structure.
CarlosBcn1989 5 months ago
present day comparison: if anybody watched the casey anthony trial, the defense repeated over and over, reasonable doubt. question: is there any reasonable doubt that osama bin laden ordered al qaeda to carry out 9/11?
alt132000 7 months ago
Do people really think that this is really a shockwave?
DKaijuGomoMan 7 months ago
Most disturbing 9/11 footage ever in my opinion.
JackoWacko4561 8 months ago
it seems too slow to be a shock wave
smokescreenninjato 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 8 months ago
@12Weasel OHH so that's when they installed all the Thermate ! Wow I thought they would have installed it aand used it right away but you are right . It would take much longer to plan this major scam as 911
they had to do tests and make sure it looked good . It still looked pretty fake though ! I remember thinking
"How will they explain all the charges it would take to implode that building ?"
SAYYOURROSARY 8 months ago
@SAYYOURROSARY you are a retard
12weasel100 8 months ago
helicopter reflection.
EeJLP 8 months ago 12
@EeJLP those windows are blown out. there isnt glass to reflect it. those are blinds blowing out from the inside.
1buckdawg 8 months ago
@1buckdawg Nooope those windows were intact
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@CClaudio21 stop at 21 seconds and tell me that. look at the far left window ..its virtually the SAME as the window above it.....which i am sure we can agree is blown out. or are you gunna be ignorant enough to dispute that too? not to mention i find it hard to believe that a helicopter reflection moves up one side of a building and not horizontally? or was the helicopter flying straight up - perfectly parallel to the window sequence of the WTC?
1buckdawg 8 months ago
@1buckdawg Ok soooo when a helicopter travels towards something the reflection will travel "up" on the reflective surface...........
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@CClaudio21 okay dickbag...check ur inbox....ur telling me those flashes are a helicopter too?
1buckdawg 8 months ago
@1buckdawg And you're telling me that they are detonations? Go back to your bunker and put your tinfoil hat on
CClaudio21 8 months ago
Comment removed
1buckdawg 8 months ago
@1buckdawg There is the AF Academy and NORAD. But I'm quite sure you could not show me any credible evidence that they were detonations
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@CClaudio21 haha yah apparently numerous videos of detonations and the ONLY 2 scientific studies done on the WTC steel that both turned up nanothermite- which has no other way of showing up other than demolition. wow. you shoulda been on the jury in the Casey Anthony trial- apparently evidence doesnt mean shit to you asshole.
1buckdawg 8 months ago
@1buckdawg Hmmm so show me the damn study where it shows nanothermite dipshit. I have seen NIST's report (No traces of chemicals like thermite present) and find them credible because they are a group of chemists and engineers with years of experience. And you probably are not.
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@CClaudio21 name calling aside, for you to report NIST as a valid source is pretty bad. Even the most prominent "terrorist theory" supporters admit the NIST report is garbage. Even the NIST employees admit it is largely flawed. Also, the NIST website claims "NIST did not test for the residue of these (Thermite/sulfer) compounds in the steel- because it would have required a very large quantity"....so aside from not testing- the theory that it would take a lot has also been debunked. NIST FAILED
1buckdawg 7 months ago
@CClaudio21 and for the nanothermite evidence all you have to do is youtube search "Neils Harrit Nanothermite"- tons of videos about it. The second study was done by "Steven Jones Nanothermite"......so what im telling you is that the only 2 studies done on the the dust/steel both showed up nanothermite. NIST did not due a study because it would have required "too much explosives"....which has also been debunked. Not to mention John Kerry himself admitted they were demolitioned.. ill keep goin
1buckdawg 7 months ago
@CClaudio21 "Bob & Bri WTC 1 flashes and other anomalies part 2"..........search that....more helicopter reflections?
1buckdawg 7 months ago
@1buckdawg You're an idiot, and those "explosions" are most definitely not demolition charges going off.
CClaudio21 7 months ago
@CClaudio21 yah. all the evidence i put forth and all you can do is call me an idiot. Typical.. great strategy. you should be on a debate team. thanks for your complete absence of evidence! great chat.
1buckdawg 7 months ago
@1buckdawg No, all you are doing is pointing at videos that claim to put forth evidence which isn't even there or is misconstrued. That is why you are an idiot.
CClaudio21 7 months ago
@CClaudio21 oh yah? how bout those two factual based studies that i talked about with Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, Ph.D., co-editor of the peer-reviewed Journal of 9/11 Studies. You do know what "peer reviewed" means, dont you?? And Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen- Department of Chemistry. He is an expert in nano-chemistry.......both these men found nanothermite in their studies. show me a study that analyzed rubble/WTC and didnt find thermite. I'm sure im still an idiot!
1buckdawg 7 months ago
@1buckdawg You didn't tell me about those, I have heard about those studies and I also know that NIST had to review it's report as a result and still did not have to change anything because they did not find any nano thermite.
CClaudio21 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CClaudio21 yes if you scroll through all my comments below you will see i did mention those. and NIST did not test for thermite/nanothermite.sulfur....so that argument of yours is invalid. FROM NIST WEBSITE "NIST did not test for the residue of these (Thermite/sulfer) compounds in the steel- because it would have required a very large quantity"....so aside from not testing- the theory that it would take a lot has also been debunked. NIST FAILED
1buckdawg 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CClaudio21 The smoke was not influenced at all. If a charge of any size would have detonated you could see the shockwave pushing the smoke.
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
@EeJLP Awesome another sane person :) It was a helicopters reflection
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@EeJLP Reflection of your stupidity, there's a high quality version of this clip on my channel and it shows clearly that there are non reflective curtains on these windows, these curtains are then blasted by a shockwave that is ripping through the building, you can even seen the different parts of the curtain and their lines. Nice one you idiot, and people wonder why they were able to get away with this. Because idiots like you can't USE YOUR OWN BRAIN when dealing with something you can fathom.
Xendrius 4 months ago
@EeJLP No it is not, the window blinds are being pushed by a blastwave, the very second the flash occurs, white smoke starts to billow out from the windows, and 5 seconds later the smoke disappears. And I have the HQ version of this on my channel, 2 people instantly react to these flashes.
And window blinds are not reflective, they obviously did not reflect the blue sky so why the hell would they reflect a hellicopter and why would would it go straight up. You gota be stupid to believe that.
Xendrius 3 weeks ago
@Xendrius You are officially retarded in my book. The blinds did not reflect the light, The glass did. The helicopter was close and was sucking the air towards it, and pulling the smoke out. The people probably were reacting to the helicopter thinking they could be saved. The helicopter did not go straight up the rest of the windows had the reflection blocked from the heavier smoke coming from the higher windows across to the south.
MegaYeshua33 1 week ago
@MegaYeshua33 Idiotboy, I got the HQ version and zooms, watch the video and see how stupid you are.
Xendrius 1 week ago
@Xendrius I've had the 1080p version since its been out. Its a helicopter reflection. I've watched on a 47 inch led screen.
MegaYeshua33 1 week ago
@MegaYeshua33 Then you need some fricking glasses, look at the damn windowss, they are NOT reflective, the glass is not there, the window blinds are, and you can see the damn lines of the blinds, each small individual section, you are either a liar, or stupid, in any way, it does not matter what you believe, does not change facts.
Xendrius 1 week ago
@Xendrius They are to reflective. They are tinted and on the shaded side of the building, and on a serious angle from the camera. They are also multi pane windows. When I did curtain walls you could tell the outside of the window pane with a lighter. if it reflected multiple flames it was the outside. Thats why it looks distorted.
MegaYeshua33 4 days ago
1. You can hear a, or multiple helicopters. Unless someone is mowing their lawn at 1200ft. Helicopters also have the ability to fly, including upward.
2. "Shock waves form when the speed of a gas changes by more than the speed of sound." The speed of sound is ~1112ft/s at 1000ft. This reflection is moving at maybe 2 floors per second or ~20ft/s.
3. It reflects off of non-broken windows. The flat grey, non-black or smoke-emitting ones and it doesn't reflect off of broken, smokey windows.
EeJLP 2 weeks ago
wow blinds congratulation the windows that weren't broken you retards.
NinjaSaiden 9 months ago
anyone here buying all this osama bin laden is dead bullshit?
chaosad09 9 months ago
you guys need to look up "bob and bri" videos of flashes. The Zionist US government didnt manage to confiscate them before it was uploaded. It shows amazing visual evidence of a controlled demolition and its scary
JoanBeatrington001 9 months ago
if anything its a reflection damn helicopter, remember, it was a sunny day and the towers had white helicopters around them???
davisotj1 9 months ago
reflection of a helicopter
crazyknight2008 10 months ago
@crazyknight2008 That's what thought i too. There's definitely other video that shows flashes, and streamers from the super thermite reactions, however.
supportdisclosure 10 months ago
It's just a shadow from a chopper. But i think it was TV fakery.
KaLaka16 10 months ago
@ninjasaiden you cannot "debunk" the natural laws of physics so i think my comment destroys your comment.
@rangerbelt ill try again. what part of a plane crash, fire, or gravity will make a building turn to dust? also, what part of a plane crash, fire, or gravity will make that dust be expelled outward? fire burns, it does not expel. gravity has one component, down, so it did not make the dust expel outwardly. i await an answer.
alt132000 10 months ago
PAGE672--The second tower was hit much lower and had a lot more weight on it and the steel did not have to weaken as much as the first tower because the weight pressing down on the damaged structure helped it fall sooner. Also the building was hit in a different spot--a whole corner was weakened, hence it fell off to the side rather than straight down like the second collapse. Also Mr. Silverstein had mortgages on the buildings and he ended up with a big loss. Try again.
Rangerbelt 10 months ago
@Rangerbelt Oh buddy buddy...how could the weight of the upper floors collapse the bottom floors if they were already toppling over? If the building collapsed so easily - as if no core column resistance at all, then it would've been a construction error and Silverstein's insurance wouldn't coughed over a single penny. He didn't win as big as some ppl think but he did avoid a huge renovation bill - removing the asbestos. Plus the ability to rebuild.
15PhenomenoN 10 months ago 2
Good God, you morons that just will not let go of the fact that a plane entered the building and blew away much of the fireproofing and then heated the steel until it weakened(NOT MELTED ) and then it could not hold the weight of the building and it collapsed. Does not take a rocket scientist to understand that . Geesh.
Rangerbelt 11 months ago
@Rangerbelt Get a brain will you.
Xendrius 10 months ago
@Rangerbelt How did the second tower to get struck by a plane fall sooner then the first one. The second plane had hotter burnig fuel?! Think for yourself and ask one simple question, Who had benefitted the most from that day? Get that answer and who find who is responsible!!!! Larry Silverstein (owner of towers) made 7 billion dollars that day, our military took over one of the biggest oil countries in the world, Sadam dead, al queda not real, so who benefitted the most?!
PAGE672 10 months ago
@Rangerbelt okay smartie pants . explain to me the pools of molten metal in the basements of 1,2 and 7. explain to me why the fires there couldnt be put out for MONTHS.
mandeemarie03 10 months ago 2
@mandeemarie03 Hahaha just because the fires couldnt be put out for months doesnt mean it was explosives. If you knew anything about explosives you would know that they are not fire based they are more of a pressure based reaction. The molten metal could be from a number of things. Airplanes are made of Aluminum and the towers collapsed with the plane inside of them. Aluminum can melt even at low temperatures you can prove this by throwing a soda can into a camp fire and will get the same thing
HalfEatenCookie1793 5 months ago
@HalfEatenCookie1793
Have you ever melted aluminum? If you did, you would surely know that molten aluminum doesn't look like molten steel. Anyways, the leading theory is that there was some kind of thermyte used, not just explosives, hence their explanation to the fires and high temperatures. I don't buy that theory, but something is very bad explained in this case.
Eodweard 5 months ago
@Eodweard Have you ACTUALLY melted Aluminum to a suitable heat? If you did and you paid attention during Science 101 you would know that anything heated to a suitable level that does not first evaporate or consume will emit radiation or light. This light or colour will change in the electromagnetic spectrum as the object's heat rises. Due to peculiarities of human colour perception we see heated objects as Red-Orange-Yellow-White-Blue. No object is excempt from this law including Aluminum.
Spindry96 4 months ago
@Spindry96
No I didn't, I just saw aluminum melting at home foundries fuelled by propane. Perhaps you're right, because *even* if thermyte was used I guess that's very improbable that it would make iron pour that way from the towers. As I said, I don't buy conspiracy theories, as I don't buy what the official report says. My opinion is that this (the WTC attacks) was a huge event with a very shallow investigation, that's why there's so much doubts and theories.
Eodweard 4 months ago
@Eodweard Thats cool, l can tell your a reasoning person, refreshing after dealing with truther logic. l even have people swearing that the planes were holograms :)
Spindry96 4 months ago
@Spindry96
Thanks. I see people nowadays tend to defend theories tooth-and-nail without questioning much, in both sides...and that's a shame, because sticking as close as possible to reality would turn matters less difficult to discuss.
Eodweard 4 months ago
it is a reflection of a helicopter flying by,not a shockwave!
atmosspheres321 11 months ago
It's light reflecting on the building/windows...a shockwave is not light, and would not be visible inside the building, nor would it be visible on this low quality video
In order to see a shockwave, you need a clear high-speed video
CrazyRay7979 11 months ago
What is funny is all of act like brainwashed commies. You claim all this 9/11 bullshit but you have no proof. Of course things are odd but their is no proof. Every time you lecture someone about your theory on NWO and all that fake bullshit is always different. If we disagree with you. You shove it down our throats or insult us. I sure as fuck know who the real brainwashers are it's you left-winged whacked jobs. Now I can agree being against the govt but the shit people say these days.
shadowhunter388 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shadowhunter388 there is proof. look up architects and engineers for 911 truth.
mandeemarie03 10 months ago
Reflection on the windows
orenofhowick 1 year ago
That's not a flash, it's the shutters of the windows flipping. Now why that happens is a mystery that's yet to be solved.....
kantk2008 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's not actual flashes but the window blinds moving from the shockwaves of the explosives going off between the window joints and the wall from within the corner supporting infrastructure of the building.
This video below is much clearer.
youtube.com/watch?v=7IXNBO8GdyM
haeresy 1 year ago
Comment removed
haeresy 1 year ago
So Wikileaks comes at the correct time?
Serganer 1 year ago
Why is it that i cant see the flash when it goes over the broken windows, seems more like a reflection of the Helicopters, really look at it closely, u never see the flash coming from the broken windows
fidelamaya26 1 year ago
btw, the engineering behind the WTC was ground breaking technology that had never been used before, and i cant recall many/if any instances it has been used since.. find me a building that doesnt have support collumns in the middle of their floor plates, only on the outside edge of the building, and the core.. that is the reason youve never seen a steel building collapse like the WTC before, or since 9/11.
yourockjustintube 1 year ago
@yourockjustintube when the towers were built, they said these buildings could withstand UP TO a Boeing 707 impact.. which was most likely only at cruising speed, as no plane ever goes full speed at that low of an altitude, or that close to possible landing/take off. keep in mind the 707 is a much smaller plane than the 767's, and has much smaller fuel tanks..
yourockjustintube 1 year ago
buildings were blown up. these government and elite are out of their stupid minds. part of it is our inability to live under this shadow. who wants to do business with these people? they really really blew it in more ways than one.
DINGLEtheBERRY 1 year ago
For Deeds it was just wind and people smoking.
TheBelldiver 1 year ago
Well, just for you Mr. Deeds, you are absolutely correct.
TheBelldiver 1 year ago
That's absolutely charges going off from the bottom to the top. Look at the additional smoke afterwards and directly afterwards everyone disapears. White smoke = thermite thermate what ever you want to call it!
TheBelldiver 1 year ago
@TheBelldiver dumb shit, i get white smoke when I light up a cigarette, and when I burn paper and stuff like that, and no, they were not charges, where were the sounds of the explosions if that's the case, it was just wind you Bellend
Deed1992 1 year ago
Yes, the blinds do look to be down. I can see the ruffling. I also see the arm of the person on the corner retract as it passes be as if he's regathering himself from a jolt.
JSSTyger 1 year ago
the helicopter is not in the correct position to be reflected where the flashes were, definitly NOT the helicopter reflection,
gmmjfan1 1 year ago
THIS IS NOT HELICOPTER REFLECTION.. IF YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE BEYOND HELP
MrZENKAIpower 1 year ago
That is called a reflection of a helicopter (which can be heard) on the windows. It is obvious. Conspiracy theorists need not apply.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
@Clarrisani
LMFAO @ a Helicopter....Now I done heard it all.
budtoken 1 year ago
@budtoken If you wish to deny the obvious for something improbable, then that is your decision.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
First off, it being a reflection is ridiculous. Second, the blinds are on the INSIDE of these windows and it would be very very difficult for the chopper's wind-force to be affecting them from inside. And last, but not least, which backs up my second point is.................how can a chopper's wind-force affect these blinds behind the windows to move and NOT affect the smoke that is pouring out? Also, how can the blinds be affected only by a chopper's wind-force and NOT the natrual high winds?
seabeejg 1 year ago
I'm believe 9/11 was an inside job. However, this clip was of a helicopter.
Anight7mareX 1 year ago
@Anight7mareX
.........Helicopter?...........Are you sure you're seeing what's being pointed out??? How 3 flashes/explosions moving up the corner of the building can be mistaken for a helicopter is beyond me.
budtoken 1 year ago
@budtoken
Agreed...if they were explosions don't you think those people would have been royally fucked?
Sorry guy, but this clip is of a helicopter.
Anight7mareX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Conspiracy theorists and idiots alike its a reflection of helicopter. Just a thought Elvis is dead, we landed on the moon, Oswald killed Kennedy, Hurricane Katrina wasn't a government weapon and terrorists were responsible for 9-11. You guys must think I'm a real nut job, huh?
sternumkick 1 year ago
Helicopter reflection in the wdw. Always was
You can hear the fucking thing if you ever bothered to LISTEN.
Figures!
This vid is STUPID.
LHOdidntdoit 1 year ago
It's reflection of hellicopter
Retrosicko 1 year ago
its kinda iffy, cuz it does look strange , but to me looked like people were closing windows,but im not sure how building was set up..but i also saw ppl still in windows that were not efected....so who can say 4 sure...oh yeah bush knows!
arlichar11 1 year ago
am i being censored again
alt132000 1 year ago
no they are not kidding. the government sheep have lost any ability to think at all.they are mindless zombies with media dictating to them what to think.all believers of the official story need to die right now. to not have the capability to think means you have no reason to live.science curses you all.drop dead you fucking mindless pieces of shit.george bush is guilty of crimes against humanity.
alt132000 1 year ago 24
@alt132000 your retarded
MrGogo4Gaga 1 year ago
@MrGogo4Gaga
you accuse me of being retarded. well then please explain why you think that? where am i wrong? the u.s. citizens know for a fact the u.s. government lies, and still accepts everything the u.s. government tells them, including that 19 muslims with boxcutters defeated the u.s. military 4 times in the course of an hour and 20 minutes. i await your answer...
alt132000 1 year ago
@alt132000 No, you deserve to die.Retard
NinjaSaiden 10 months ago
@alt132000 Brother Bush was head of security at the Twin Towers where there had been a renovation project underway for months . How do you like that ?
SAYYOURROSARY 9 months ago
@alt132000 Hahahahahahahaha you are fucking hilarious! Seriously I have never laughed so hard at a youtube comment in my life.
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@alt132000 Ok dipshit... answer this. You know how Bush was in power for only about one year at the time... Right?? How the fuck could he possibly plan all of this in less than a year?? Something like this would take years of planing... Second of How the fuck dare you talk like that just because of other peoples opinions. If anything, you should be the one dropping dead now.
DKaijuGomoMan 7 months ago
Comment removed
1buckdawg 7 months ago
Ya I can see the blinds smash against the window. Maybe it's fuel exploding still inside?
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
its a reflection from the helicopter.....
iluvCDO 2 years ago
Reflections?! You have got to be kidding! You can clearly see the blinds slam against each window from the sequential concussions!!!
gs12xu 2 years ago 9
I don't think this could look any more like reflections in the windows (especially in slow motion). Do people honestly believe that this video shows flashes from demolition charges? Even if I believed that 9/11 was an inside job I would argue against this one. This is just embarrassing.
chipleader64 2 years ago
The men who did this as an inside job are ruthless *ssholes.
They worship the Talmud which praises them for doing evil for personal profit.
Bush said in a press conference, the plan was to trap people in the upper floors so they could not escape. Who gave Bush that information? He has not revealed that name to us. Someone knew that the plan was to trap people in the upper level. Don't tell me Bin Laden planned to trap people in the upper level.
Illuminati torture people for fun.
ExoticGawdess 2 years ago 2
I just don't see it . Maybe some red arrows lighting up at the right time ? i know they were popping off cutter charges up there
and people were in terror I'm sure
on many videos you can see what
google Captian Karin Desore EMS
was talking about . belts of explosions
going up and down and then all aroud exploding . Why woulds a EMS CAPTAIN
lie ?
SAYYOURROSARY 2 years ago
light reflection of a chopper...
Nicklacruz 2 years ago
sorry friend , but how stupid can you bee
NWOisOWN 2 years ago
@NWOisOWN You're not my friend you fag! inside job hippie!
Nicklacruz 2 years ago
@Nicklacruz and you beleive in conspiracy theories such as the offical US govt 9/11 story hahahahaha
ODAL123 2 years ago
looks like a shock wave blowing blinds around
cjellwood 2 years ago 15
@cjellwood And pigs can fly.
CClaudio21 8 months ago
@CClaudio21 Well your little theories sure as hell make sense..... at least to you. So I guess pigs can fly.
CClaudio21 8 months ago
Pirla, è semplicemente il riflesso dell'elicottero ! ! !
iTubeSoon 2 years ago
Yeah, i've never heard of a steel framed building collapse due to fire, but then again, i've never heard of a jumbo jet full of fuel crash into a building either. And btw, if the government wanted to destroy one of our buildings as an excuse to go to war, why would they decide to destroy the buildings that are the center of our economy and the pentagon, which is the center of our defense??? Not to mention, what was the point of crashing the plane in Pennsylvania? Grow up 82thadangerous1.
RockiesFan712 2 years ago
Whoa, a reflection of a helicoptor in the windows.....o u t s i d e j o b
guitarspeare 2 years ago
A reflection..of helicopters..in the windows...? That is the worst explination I've ever heard. INSIDE JOB.
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
actually if you pause it at around 20 seconds you can clearly see that it is a reflection of a police helicoptor. And it is obviously extrenal as there is no change in the building structure during the "flashes" open your mind 82th, see the reality of a terrorist attack, not the fantasy of the misnamed truth movement.
guitarspeare 2 years ago
This conversation ended quickly considering 82th doesnt even make sense....idiot
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
ummm 82th is a shortening of your name
guitarspeare 2 years ago
then you mean 82nd....genius
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
ummm nope, since you aren't a very dangerous 1, just took taht off. Please look how you spell your name. Also, you have no sense of physics, please refer to the concpet of potential energy. Outside job, you lunatic
guitarspeare 2 years ago
What does my name even have to do with it? And laws of physics would tell that these buildings would've taken much longer to collapse like they did. Instead of nearly freefall speed, around 10 seconds, it should have taken atleast 20-25 seconds with the resistance of each floor, like we were told. ATLEAST. Call me a lunatic all you want, but don't tell me how to spell my name when you just put 'taht' in your response. Idiot.
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
WHoa, you are claiming near freefall speed for WTC 1 and 2...watch this video, if you are really interested in finding out the truth v=qLShZOvxVe4
guitarspeare 2 years ago
I'm not claiming, I'm informing. If there was resistance it would've taken significantly longer. It might not have been EXACTLY freefall speed, but there was no resistance.
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
There was plenty of resistance and once again I ask you to watch this video v=qLShZOvxVe4 . let me kow what you think.
guitarspeare 2 years ago
Dude, seriously. Can you have an open mind? Can you not be held on a leash by our government? Everything you've said to me is false. No steel building before or after 9/11 collapsed due to fire. The fire was not strong, considering people above it's harshest point were able to get below it and escape. WTC 7 fell for absolutely no reason, while buildings that were weaker and closer to the towers maintained their steel frames. Try, just try to realize that 9/11 was way more than it seemed.
82thadangerous1 2 years ago 2
Oh, and by the way, I watched your prized video, and it was crap. You can look at the comment I left on there too.
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
So what! The building was on fire. You are going to have explosions!!! HELLO MCFLY, IS THERE ANYONE HOME? Hummmm lets take something much smaller like a CAR! have it burn for a while and BOOM it will explode DUH! Give me a break.
viper2808 2 years ago 4
This was an OFFICE building, not a car. A car would go boom because of gasoline. What sort of materials would be in the upper, middle, lower and basement levels of an office building to cause ALL those explosions that were heard by reporters, first responders and civilians? Nano-thermite is real. Look it up. And don't forget to get your flu shot.
lmfecher 2 years ago
Looks to me like the reflection of a helicopter. Also thermite doesn't detonate, it deflagrates.
Cyf531 2 years ago 2
OMG, REALLY? This is all you are bringing to the conversation? What about your claim that "so many fucking things could have caused this besides this "Nano-thermite?" Again, please enlighten me as to what could have possibly happened to obliterate three steel framed buildings?
lmfecher 2 years ago
nano thermite is added to a HE..it's never going to act as a high explosive by itself ...and additionally there is no point even using nano thermite. u don't need thermobaric or extremely powerfull he to do this, pbx around the frame will do it.
nixrate 2 years ago
just thinkin, concrete explodes when it's heated up. The small amount of water in it creates a sort of steam bomb with a HUGE explosion. I'm not sayin it's the cause of the flashes in this video, but it is of course a material in those floors as well as all over the building that could have caused some of the exposions those people heard.
deeders05 2 years ago
viper2808,
cars are filled with gasoline. the explosion would only happen when the fire came in contact with flammable substances. are you saying that several explosions occurred on different floors, in sequence demo charge pattern, by coincidence?!? LMAO!! coincidence theories are for people that cant grasp simple concepts.
Niels Harrit and 8 other scientists found nano-thermite in the dust from the World Trade Center. He is interviewed on danish TV2 News.
watch?v=8_tf25lx_3o
The4LA2Baker0 2 years ago
Yeah, let 'em know...
82thadangerous1 2 years ago
I do think that this video is a reflection and wind of a helicopter.
azvideoguy 2 years ago 4
New york owns this and new jersey finding they bought an insurance policy for 65 billion dollars before these homemade missiles look like planes were hit staged an accident wackos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!in with Florida with brevard county florida so was the Pentagon was told to get out cops howse its their howse
richmondpalmbay62 2 years ago
The insurance 1992 their family here in indialantic florida found out about the insurance on the towers not me at all mental health order their family was crazy conspiracy were unaware of any conspiracy until now
richmondpalmbay62 2 years ago
This insurance company in florida an new york verififed this was an accident and the owners could collect 65billion dollars for the staged accidents more accidents wackos child molesters and coke heads are having a lot of snort need this when they molest boys need cocaine how much of it in florida
richmondpalmbay62 2 years ago
Very little wind? Yeah... that's why the smoke is blowing sideways.
FishOn0408 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BREAKING NEWS
TheAlexJonesChannel and THElNFOWARRlOR- official Alex Jones channel on youtube are both closed!!!
STOP CENSORSHIP YOUTUBE!!
please stop censor Alex Jones!!!!
it proves 9/11 was an inside job
Government and youtube is attacking free speech!!please contact youtube and google- and say to stop attack free speech!!
(650) 343-2960
1-650-623-4000
911insidejob81 2 years ago