Added: 5 years ago
From: muzicmaker2001
Views: 26,761
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (151)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Also, you will notice it says "17:37:19" then the next frame is "17:37:21" followed immediately by "17:37:22".

  • Did anybody else notice that the security camera timestamp says "Sept 12, 2001, 17:37:xx" ?

  • Lol, to all those who think it was a missle. If it was a missle the damage to the building would be a lot worse. Missles cause explosions, not fireballs. There were debris from the plane inside and outside the building. How did a landing gear get inside the building if there was no plane? If flight 77 didn't hit the pentagon then what happened to it and all the passengers? Did they just dissappear into thin air?

  • @ssimon64

    See my reponse to jc2455 below. It was all captured on video. Obviously, not a 155 ft long 757...

  • @ssimon64 Take a look to documentary by Jesse Ventura where a women that was Army veteran, that was working in the Pentagon, few feet away from the impact and who escaped with her son through the hole left after the impact, confirm that the hole was so small that it looked to her that it was a missile. An army veteran!

  • Shut the fuck up with your annoying gay voice idiot! The plane is there in frame one but it's very low to the ground. You can see it, you have to look close. Why does it matter how long the plane is? Once again your voice is annoying and gay and you're a big homo! STFU!

  • NO PLANE JUST JEWISH LIES !!!

  • this plane was flying over 500 mph..this security camera takes pictures every 2 seconds..do the math, idiots

  • Comment removed

  • I told my room mate the security footage shows an object resembling a missile hitting the building not a plane. He claims when it happened he saw a news report showing the planes tail sticking out the Pentagon. I saw the whole thing live on TV and there was no news report depicting a plane tail sticking out the Pentagon. Only a trench and a huge hole. What the hell is he talking about?

  • Why does the date say Sep. 12, 2001?

  • Well cording 2 my coclations this camera is lasting 2 tape all of the crash but thats impossibal bcaz a camera usally only has 100 mega pixles and if it could last the crash then well technocil it wouldnt so i prove this is a fake and plz dont make fake vids of this it is serious stuff thnxxx

  • is anyone going to take the position of defending the idea that we made it look like we were attacked AND that we needed to do it? our country must truly be on the verge of failure due to who knows what if we were willing to stoop to this level (a single 1 frame per second shot of an explosion that a walmart webcam would capture better)

  • I see the plane

  • @TheDisturbedCow

    and i can see elvis flying the plane. i'm with u dude.

  • @seeknthetruth mhmmmm

  • @blackjerryboymetal Oh my god what a stupid fucker you are ! THEY DO NOT HAVE EVIDENCE ! IT DOES NOT EXIST ! THEY ONLY SAID THAT THEY HAVE IT SO THAT STUPID INBRED CHRISTIAN FUCKTARDS LIKE YOURSELF WOULD JUST BELIEVE IT EXISTS ! You do not question anything because you are an idiot that believes anything he is told !

    Hey why dont you just sit down in front of fox news and american gladiators , just soak it up like a sponge , dont question anything , go back to sleep.

  • @blackjerryboymetal Have you actually read what you typed ? Can you really think of no reason why they would say evidence exists then refuse to show it ? Is blind faith in George Bush all you have ?

  • Grainy images and bizzare coincidence is one thing but for me the thing that throws real doubt on what the government says is the fact that they hide evidence and make suspect changes to the evidence they do release , if all they say is true then why hide anything ?

  • I am not sure what to believe about this impact. I think you have went into great detail trying to explain your theory but there is one thing you failed to factor into you equation. The length of the plane would have appeared shorter in length as it was coming in at an angle to the Pentagon. Can you refractor this into your theory?

  • This video's explanation is retarded. You can clearly see if you zoom in, the blue and red pixels that identify the color of the plane. You can also see the nose of the plane, and THE TAIL is CLEARLY VISIBLE. Look at the before and afters of the explosion. You can clearly see the dark tail disappear from the frame after the explosion. Due to the distance from the video camera, the plane appears MUCH smaller than we would think. Nothing here but proof the 757 hit the pentagon.

  • @gunslingerroy

    that has got to be the biggest bunch of bs that I have ever heard. people with any real intelligence know that if a plane really crashed at the pentagon, it would be so obvious that we wouldn't even be here debating it.

  • @gunslingerroy you'll be swinging from a rope shill

  • @ctcole77

    In the same respect, if you believe the official version, why aren't demanding the capture of Osama?

    Post a photo or video showing 95% of Flight 93. You can't mean this RKowen's lie where not even 10% of the plane is shown?

    watch?v=xkivdEGph9A

    Enter logic: You shouldn't have to rely on ANY witnesses when an 80 ton plane crashes into a small hole in a building. Good luck on the next TY page you visit...

  • @ctcole77

    even though i believe the official story.....the above evidence is piss poor ...a 5 or 6 frame tape that is really inconcusive.....this argument could be put to bed if they released other security ..which they definitly have

  • @lonewolf2379

    WHAT "OTHER SECURITY [videos]"?

    The ones that look down at the parking lot?

    That's the point. There's nothing to see. No plane on the other videos.

    As for you "piss poor" comment, this video is just one of DOZENS of pieces of evidence that DEBUNK 911 truth.

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @ctcole77

    debunk....this dosent debunk anything

    you want the truthers to finally believe a plane hit then present them with other footage clearly showing a plane hitting.

    even i cant see a goddamn plane here and i believe i plane hit it alright....

    and the parking lot camera's ..or other camera's along the roof....or camera's inside the building....

    i worked at a petrol station when i was 15 that had better qaulity than this.....

  • id have to agree, where are the other tapes? why keep us in confusion? they say it was a terrorist attack then whats there to hide?

    they could have tampered the video and covered the plane and made a switch on the time idk its a wild guess.

  • why do you think the plane is straight on? didn't it come in at an angle? just curious.

  • release this video is the biggest farce the US-GOV has done.when i hear news anchor on CNN saying:"this is proof of flight 77,hitting building",I say to myself:this guy cannot honestly believe what he's saying..!!!NO WAY..!!??knowing that a least 80 cams caught what hit the pentagon,you KNOW it is a lie,and people who believe that crap are just brainless idiot dunkies who believe to be patriots because they swallowed that joke.

  • Comment removed

  • I'm no conspiracy nutbag but um. the 9/12/01 Time on the camera does raise a red flag there. And some eyebrows.

  • Sure you can see the plane, and it`s as PLAIN AS DAY ISN`T!!!!! Why haven`t they released all of the videotapes!!!! Explain this!!!! I can hardly believe that there are people who are still that dumb out there. There`s no plane to be even found!!! And the hole that the plane supposedly created is so small that it is a joke. Steel Titanium parts were a part of the plane, and nothing was found... Anyway, a true independent investigation into 911 is warranted!!!!

  • ISN`T IT!!!!! (is what this should say)

  • conclusion: since papavalium has been posting all day on dozens of videos, you probably shouldn't trust him to think for you.

  • So wait a missle hit the Pentagon, and this camera caught it? LOL A missle travels faster then a speeding bullet.

    Bullet =180 m/s to 1500 m/s

    Missle=from 860 m/s to 1500 m/s to 3000m/s

    Conclusion. If you think this camera caught a speeding bullet you are on crack. LMAO

  • The CCTV captured everything:

    watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6A

  • Great video! yeah...where are all those surveillance videos? Those lying bastards!

  • @jc2455 Passanger planes can travel at supersonic speeds...stupid ppl

  • lol supersonic speed so you saying concord hit the penatgon

  • @jc2455 The plane was going about 540 mph. Supersonic speeds are 768 mph in dry air of 68* F. just saying.

  • @jc2455 ;That's an Idiotic comment.

    The term supersonic is used to define a speed that is over the speed of sound.

    An eyewitness pilot says approx 350 knot(403mph) and the conspirators say approx 450 Knots(517.5mph).

  • @jc2455 PLanes do not travel at supersonic speeds unless they are the concord .

    See this is for 2 reasons:

    1:after you break the speed barrier the plane consumes signifantly more fuel , this is because the wind is no longer going around the front of the plane it is now crashing violently since the wind doesn't have time to move out of the way.

    2:noise , planes traveling over the speed of sound would create sonic booms and would annoy residents .

    Passenger planes can only travel 80% of said.

  • @jc2455 a 757 cant go supersonic it would brake apart deu to g-force

  • @jc2455

    the plane aint going that fast you dimwit....

  • @jc2455 Boeing 747 can NOT fly at a supersonic speed specially that low!

  • @jc2455 A huge momentum and mass as you pretend, should leave far greater trail of damages

  • yes the time and date stamp is a real

    puzzler

  • WTF WHY WHY are people even watching this read the sercurity camera tiltie its september 12TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not eleventh

  • nothing should have hit the pentagon. this implies that a stand down order existed. as appears to be confirmed ny minetas testimony at the 9/11 hearings. the authorities could easily show us what hit the pentagon, but they do not. this implies that the provision of contradictory information is deliberate and has purpose. these provide prima facie evidence that the official story of the pentagon is false and a coverup exists. no matter what hit the pentagon. a new investigation is justified

  • wtf? the plane is right there, only is not bright white, it looks darker, maybe coz of camera/poition. If u look when his painted plane disapears, you can see the plane.

  • there is only 2 videos released from the feds.. and now you wonder why

  • wow why does it say september 12........... FAKE

  • again

  • the date on the security camera is september 12 this is fucking retarded

  • That's the whole point. The time stamp on the Pentagon security camera says Sep 12 at 5:37 pm. It should say Sep 11. Yes, it's fake. A fake plane crash. Research it....

  • Hey dumb fuck, you poor misguided brainwashed idiot!

    Many parts of the Government are a Corporate fascist state and under International Bank control.

    Are you Naive enough to trust your Government on every thing they ever say?!??!

  • one simple question, why would the american government kill thousands of their own innocent people

  • Iraq, Afghanistan, NWO... to them they are collective damage.

  • Why would the American government kill thousands of their own people? To go to war and further their agenda of having the whole world run by one government that's why. What do you think the wars are all about out there in Afghan and Iraq?

    "War on Terror" come on don't take what these people tell you seriously.

  • @parker9669 Because the only way american people will support "war on terror" is making them believe that they have been attacked. And with the people on their side, the government (or whoever is in charge) can do what they want: create wars and conflicts (to sell weapons, test new ones, reconstruct areas... business), change laws, etc... Killing those thousands of americans is nothing compared to the amount of benefits they will obtain, for them the end justifies the means.

  • get an education,learn how to spell,and research the topic before mouthing off and making a fool of yourself.

  • well sorry for not being an american an spelling in english corectly...I would like to see you spell in Croatian or German...and by the way there is not a specific class in my history college that teaches about 9/11 conspiracy's so wich education do you mean??? Don't you see how these theory's are effecting the people who lost their loved ones on 9/11??? How would you feel like if you loose you'r father and some internet dick says that it's a hoax ???

  • i meant an education in general,you have posted comments saying people who want to find out the trut are assholes and jerk off to this,thats not very smart is it,whats your problem?where you mobbed by 9/11 truthers?yes the theorys are effecting people who lost family and freinds on 9/11 because they are begining to see what their own country did to them.

  • conspiracy theorysts are saying that it were not actualy airplaines that hit the towers and the pentagon...they are saying that the airplanes safely landed somewere else...try to tell that to a kid that lost it's mother that was in that plane that her mother is safe some where else, but she just dosent want to come home...do you realise how dumb that sounds???the only thing that those theory's are doing to those people is harming them and it's dissrespecting their loved ones

  • well i have never seen interviews with of any family members of the supposed people who where on the "plane" that hit the pentagon,have you?what about flight 93? a crater only about 20 feet long and 10 feet wide was left with a few bits of debris,every other plane crash leaves massive amounts of debris.they obviously had a bomb and some plane parts buried in advance of 9/11

  • those people who MAKE UP those theory's are the same kind of people that think that man never landed on the moon...that theory was just as popular in the 70's as the 9/11 theory's are today...

  • watch 'loose change the fina'l cut on google video.america have done this trick 3 times before1)world war 1,they sailed a merchant ship into german waters knowing they would be attacked 2)WW2,fdr knew of japanese planes approaching pearl harbour and did his upmost to create tension with the japanese,freezing assets in the U.S. etc 3)the gulf of tonkin incident is now known to have been a setup.

  • Hey Screw Ball. Make sense on what subject you discuss. WHY? So other normal people can read your stupidity and have an easier time putting your foot in your mouth.

  • I'm confused...are you now taking a jerk at the video or at my comments????go fuck your sister or something...I'f people like you hate your goverment so fucking mutch then move to Nicaragua, but don't give me your bullshit just cause I don't share the same opinion...

  • then i don't get it why did they still say it happen by a plane it clearly looks like a missel and not a plane what happen to the seats tires and metal form the plane.

  • I noticed the date straight away... staged.. and not very well I might add, Im sure Universal studios could have done a lot better!

  • look @ the date on the bottom of the vid..

    Sept. 12 2001? oooooo I see a conspiracy

  • Since you have good eyesight, maybe you can point out where this big azz plane is in the video????

  • there is none!!! what the fuck!!!! omg but the govt. doesnt lie to us...... oh right, IT DOES

  • Really interesting, I live in in Europe but when itt happend, this video have been in news and the moderator told "take a look on the date, there is 12th" !!!

  • CONSPIRACY SOMEBODY CALL 911

  • OMG CONSPIRICY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • why does the video say sept 12?????

  • yeah wtf is with that?

  • am i the only 1 that notices how it says september 12????

  • how come the wheels recovered were not from a 757 ?

  • because you've been totally misinformed, misled, and you're ingesting nonsense from paranoia pimps.

  • Can you provide any links about this?

  • 911myths. c o m /images/d/d9/Pentagon_Wheel_Ae­rospaceweb.pdf

  • So, you're telling me that they can release every known picture, document, exhibit relating to the Moussaoui trial here...

    rcfp*org/moussaoui/

    But they can't show a plane on a security tape? And this is to protect national security? What are you smoking?

  • what are YOU smoking?

    it doesn't matter whether or not the plane was in the video

    if the tapes were made public, EVERYONE would know exactly where those cameras are positioned. hence, security reasons

    common sense, really.

  • I really don't think the locations of the security cameras that suppoedly captured Flight 77 are a threat to national security considering that we "normally" should have a good idea when a plane or intruder comes anywhere near the building. And how about the surveillance tapes that were confiscated from neighboring buildings by the FBI? Everything smells like cover up to me...

  • Do you even have any clue why the FBI confiscated the tapes?

    CRIME SCENE EVIDENCE

    Why do you think the FBI confiscates evidence at other crime scenes? They don't have to release jack shit.

    And the locations of the security cameras are a threat to the PENTAGON.

    People can study the videotapes, get an idea of where they are, figure out the angle at which to try to take them out or sneak past or whatever.

    No coverup. Just smart security measures.

    Again, common sense.

  • Just so you know, some of the confiscated tapes and another camera view of the Pentagon security cam was forced to be released through the Freedom of Information Act and Judicial Watch.

    judicialwatch*org/September_11­_2006_Videos*shtml

  • i smoke the weed that grows on your mommas ass

  • Where is the plane?

    Are you blind? You can see its tail rising above the pillar. In the next frames the tail isn't there! Drawing a straight line to the right from half of the height of the Pentagon makes it abundantly obvious that the fuselage is behind that small pillar. Get a brain.

  • I think I'm blind also. A 757 is approx 155 ft long. The Pentagon's height is approx 77 ft. Does the length of the object that you call the plane seem more than double the height of the Pentagon where it impacted?

    youtube*com/watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6­A

  • So what triangular shape do you think it is that's disappearing from one frame to the next if it's not the tail of the plane? If your answer is "could be anything" than I offer that same response to "where's the front of the plane?" Simply not enough resolution to tell what's going on in these frames. Check out watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8. Maybe you've seen it before. It's a computer "reenactment" showing evidences of the size of the plane and physical debris left behind. I repeat. Get a brain.

  • That little trangular spot is a 100 ton, 155 ft long plane? Ok. Yes, I have seen the case study before. Computer animation is great, but a true reenactment?? The security cam has been obviously tampered with. The shadows look weird, the date and time are stamped incorrectly. The debris/wreckage doesn't match up. The impact hole doesn't match up. The witnesses statement's don't match up. Please wake up soon.

  • Never said the triangle was a 155 foot long plane. I said it was the tail of the plane, which is a triangle. I've said that three times now. And my question remains, what do you think the triangle is?

  • The obvious question is, if that's the tail, where's the rest of the 155 ft plane in front of the tail? A 155 ft 757 can't just hide behind that pillar. The video is correct. A simple dimension comparison shows the obvious. No plane..Considering that the video has been tampered with, who knows what that triangle is???

  • Not sure why I even bothered trying. Good luck to ya.  I'm sure you wish the same to me.

  • Yes, good luck 2 u.

  • "Witness statements don't match up" That's really not that uncommon.

  • "it didn't appear to crash into the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings fly forward. I saw the airplane just disintegrate"-Tim Timmerman

    Yes, small inconsistencies are normal, but it never even hit the building? It hit the ground? Where's the lawn damage? The wings flew forward? Where? Into the building? Wake up!!!

  • whao whao whao whao why do the vid say sep. 12,2001 instead of sep. 11,2001?

  • because they dont wanna get blamed for killing thousands of people

  • I crap myself watching this... man what the hell is going on in this world? are they reading these comments, do they know who we are? Where we live?

  • fucking crazy Muslims!!!

  • wow, mcdonalds has better survailance systems than the pentagon

  • Oh and another thing, look at the smoke trail and tell me where the fucking plane is?

  • Who ever believes this rot on how a plane hit the Pentagon is the fool. People are country is falling apart at the seams and while you sit back and watch your American Idol our freedoms are going down the shitter. Wake the fuck up and protect your freedoms before BOSH and his special interests sell this country off to the highest bidding!

  • Bosh? "Are country?" Get the fuck out!

  • Flight 77 is in this video. The person who made this video is a fool.

  • Your just ignorant and brainwashed by the news

    9/11 was staged

  • all i can think of is that some jet fighters were in the process of diabling this jet. yeah one of there missles may have missed it target and hit the building too.

  • So I take it that airplane just disappeared right? They took it back to Pakistan?

    Come on now. Use your head.

  • More on the Pentagon CCTV:

    youtube[dot]com/watch?v=0Om9_L­bco6A

  • Its the most high security building in the world, and no video footage????

  • who said its the "most high security building in the world"? There is no missile defense on property. No automated gun defense. For crying out load its right next to a fucking run way. And why the hell would they post cameras filming a field of grass?

  • This conspiracy bullshit sucks! Do you guys know the speed a plane travels, do you know that a security camera records somewhat 1 or 2 frames a second? Do you think the camera is gonna catch the plane in detail? I don't believe so.

  • Where's the plane? Why isn't there video of even the plane approaching the Pentagon? surveillance cameras, Camera phones, anything?

    watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6A&mode=relat­ed&search=

  • "Camera phones, anything?" you mean a camera phone of a witness? One of the dozens of witnesses you discredit and don't believe. So are they liers? Or shills? If they are shills why didn't they just fake a camera phone image? And if there was a camera phone image are you telling me you would actually believe it to be real? Of course not!!!

  • " And if there was a camera phone image" Compare the amount of footage of the WTC planes to the lack of with Flight 77. This is highly congested area. A 757 flying that low to the ground shouldn't been a surprise to anyone. And yes, the Pentagon is (was?) one of the most secure buildings in the world. Even Walmart has more cameras.

  • "you mean a camera phone of a witness" Nope. There were many inconsistencies with the witness statements. There's way too many to post here. If you like, I can email you.

  • Inconsistent Witness Accounts:

    here's a sample:

    "it didn't appear to crash into the building; most of the energy was dissipated in hitting the ground, but I saw the nose break up, I saw the wings fly forward. I saw the airplane just disintegrate"-Tim Timmerman

    (It didn't hit the buiding? Hit the ground? Lawn damage?)

    "the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring into A-E Drive."-Every Walker Lee

    (what really happened to the nose?)

  • fuck yea it would catch the plane in detail! if itis that long, and it didnt go through teh whole building therefore about half of the plane would still be sticking out.

  • "and it didnt go through teh whole building"

    What the hell are you talking about???? go back to sleep.

  • bitch im talking about a hole in the pentagon. in other videos u can clearly see how far in the hole is. there for some of the plane would be sticking out. BECAUSE THE HOLE ISNT AS LONG AS THE PLANE

  • you guys are all crack heads.. leave America and move to canada or mexico. Get out of my country.

  • i dont want that shit in my country...go to mexico!

  • Just answer this question "why the secrecy" I believe that it was a plane... but why the secrecy?

    How about a picture from the camera without a plane in it, for comparison?

  • "Just answer this question "why the secrecy""

    You seem to not realize the premise of a secret. You can't answer the "why" with out breaking the "secret". They are kinda tied together you know. UFO conspiracist used to say the same thing about the rosswell crash. "if its nothing why keep it a secret?" Well they had a good fucking reason. They where spying on the russians.

  • my uncle was working there that day send me a message to know what he said

  • what did he say?

  • They did release photos of the crash into the pentagon and yes it is infact a boeing 757, also there is confirmed evidence from airtraffic control logs and transponder data; not to mention the black box that was recovered. Why does this retard in the video sound like Kermit the frog..must be from the world of SATAN's children aka Allah. You will crumble as Hilter did.

  • "They did release photos of the crash into the pentagon and yes it is infact a boeing 757" Where?

  • "not to mention the black box that was recovered" The data from the black boxes was unrecoverable (with all 4 planes on 911). hmm? That's convenient.

  • very nice video...although your voice bugs the shit out of me, lmao

  • i will tell you why. because it was a cruise missle that hit the building.

  • It bothers me that a lot of people only look at one piece of the pie and make a comment decision based on one part of the information that's availiable.

  • Excuse me but, Forensic Analysis is not a popularity contest. The Chain-Of-Evidence is called a chain for a reason. If one link in the COE is broken then the rest is impossiable. For exampile, If a airplane dosen't take off then it most certaintly could not land, or in this case crash. What bothers me is people think more or less evidence and do not consider the sequencal order of the event.

  • The CCTV is obviously tampered with. The date shown is Sept 12??? Also, if you match the "vapor trail" with the real size of a Boeing 757, the plane would've had to have been dragging on the ground.

  • the plane flys directly into a radar deadzone was off rader for a while then a blip appears assumumed to be flight 77 a extra link in chain maybe

  • (continued) and the lenth is scaled down how? how r u sure ur measurment r correct? plus if the plane was on a slight angle that changes things 2. n this is a large open area where lots of ppl are. dont u think SOME1 would have cn this missle? i cant believe all this conspiracy stuff is all over youtube

  • This conspiracy stuff is all over youtube because of this: Logically, don't you think a boeing 757 (Flight 77) with a length of 155 ft, wingspan of 125 ft and weight of nearly 100 tons would be VERY easy to spot in a security camera? This shouldn't be a guessing game to spot the tail. Also, nearly 100 tons of plane and its passengers just disintegrated upon impact?

  • i do c the tail. n its NOT in the other frames. hold the slider on the player, move it threw the sequence n its only in the 1st frame. n i do c what appears 2 b the nose of the plane. its such a bad res so of course if u hold a bright pic of a plane over this pic its gonna stand out. if u notice u cant make out much of the senery. so giving the angle of the shadows coming towards the lens, the planes view is on the shadow side, blending it in with evrythng else.

  • My first comment meant, Frame 20 would have shown the plane or object that it was really, that's why 20 was taken out because it wasn't what they claimed it was, the clip was altered because they had to show people something.

  • There was a video on Google videos that showed the frames separate and I see almost the same here also, everyones trying to see the plane, but the key is the frames there's a frame missing, Frame 20!

  • I don't think that's a tail.Pause the video at frames 00:13, 00:14. You can still see what you say is a tail even after the plane has made impact. And, after the explosion, then it looks like that "tail" is now overexposed and light colored.

  • tru tru

  • behined the stone, you see the tail sticking up.

  • you do see the tail

  • Where? So, a Boeing 757 tail hit the Pentagon??

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more