they are both good. but the 1962 version is much better as everyone says. it was raw and emotional and i cried in most scenes, this one is very good but it just doesnt have that emotion that the original had.
And all that hair swinging around is a distraction from the anger that had to be shown in this portion of the movie, I think that patty duke got Melissa beat.
i like Melissa gilbert a lot but this role wasn't for her.She was too old and not very convincing as helen.Patty duke was in 1962 even if she was a teen.She really had helen under her skin.And was just perfect in this role.Melissa gilbert wasn't.
@vintagefan92 ~ Yes! the anger,as well as the mannerisms of a blind--not to mention deaf!---child, are all missing. Melissa did great as Laura Ingalls, but she just didn't have it where this role was concerned. ..She should have called up Melissa Sue Anderson, who played blind sister Mary on Little House' for some pointers for the part~
@tubeeorrnottubee EXACTLY! One would think that after playing with a "blind" girl for a while on Little House on the Prairie she would have picked up some of her techniques. I was just reading Patty's (or should I say Anna?) autobiography and according to Anna, Melissa was too "elegant" to act really crazy. Anyway, I still like Melissa Gilbert! hehe
@vintagefan92 ~ Elegant??! LOL .. Funny, I never thought of her quite that way.. but being around her, Patty-Anna knows best! ... I wonder if she, Patty-Anna that is, was happy with the movie when all was said and done..=?
It'd be great to see the Ingalls-Wilder clan back again in a reunion for a take on "These Happy Golden Years", the last {i believe} of Laura Ingalls Wilder's memorable books. :)
Melissa Gilbert is a very talented actress, I think she did a wonderful job as Helen Keller. For the idiots who are bad mouthing her, leave her alone she has more talent than you morons could ever hope to have.
I have to say' Patty deff does a hell of a better job playing Helen than Melissa Gilbert. Patty Duke was made for that role. And Anne Bandcroft for playing Annie Sullivan. I dont like this version. The orginal is better. I hate remakes of movies.
@tubeeorrnottubee Yes i agree.Very bad choice.Melissa gilbert is far too old to act helen.She's as tall as annie sullivan.Not credible.Patty duke was thousand times better in the miracle worker version of 1962.Melissa gilbert is a pale imitation.
@tubeeorrnottubee I think it was Melissa Gilbert's company who approached Patty Duke about doing it. (Melissa probably didn't even realized what she had gotten herself into!) :D
Oh, this version shouldn't been made. It is quite cheap imitation compared to the 1962 version (which I find the best) and little Helen is unnaturally big girl, if I'm not mistaken, even little Patty in 1962 was bigger than real Helen and this girl - oh it is a miss not a child! sometimes this scene makes me ashamed, I'm sorry to say this. Cheap, cheap, cheap! But thank you very much for this video, I'm very grateful I could compare the versions!
@demigrl21 ~ So true..but in the old one, Patty Duke knew how to act blind! Melissa didn't have a CLUE! She obviously didn't study well for this part.
if i ever get to play helen in a production of this play, i think it'd be perfect for me. i have almost no hearing in my left ear and have probably 25 percent of no hearing in the right. i was also born early and was diagnosed with minor cerebral palsy, due to my not having enough time for my soft palate and hard palate to develop properly before i was born, i have moderate speech problems. not sure if this qualifies, but i wear glasses too. Can barely see without "em.
melissa gilbert was 15/16 just like patty duke who was 16 when she played helen keller on broadway and the 1962 movie. helen is supposed to be played by a younger girl since her age stars at 7 up to 12 years old. when melissa and patty played her, they looked young enough for the part.
i want to play her if i ever see auditions for it. I am an adult now, but I look young for my age (more without makeup), so I could probably pull it off.
This is muy horrible! You can tell this was a "get a way from the little house role." She's too old and no one can play the role like Patty Duke. (Or Anne Bancroft for that matter.)
sdorry but you cant remake a classic patty duke played the part of helen so much better and anne bancroft the part of miss sullivan was much better to. the original movie was more convincing
I don't think Miss Sullivan's heart was in it, when she signed "good girl". LOL It's quite amazing the way Helen Keller turned out in her life, though!
i'm playing Helen Keller in my school's production of this, and i am nervous beyond belief. doing my best to study realistic mannerisms and such, though; i do not want to overdo it so that people cant take it seriously.
ya a young teenager is but it is still amazing cause the only other thing she was in besides this that i know of was little house on the prarie so this is absolutly amazing for her!!!!
I didn't think that Helen Keller couldn't make any noise. I thought she could scream. She was just deaf and blind, so she was unable to learn to speak. Throughout this scene she doesn't utter a single cry... so I gues she couldn't, or wouldn't.
What is this??? When Patty was Helen and Anne Bancroft Annie Sullivan, it was much better- this hasn't even a half of the action of the first movie! That scene form the one from 1962 was quick,shocking, you were tired with them but this...I'm very sorry to say this,but I am really NOT satisfied with this.
You're right, but from what I've heard, the playwright changed Helen's age to twelve so a teenager could portray her, as the role would be difficult for an actual six-year-old to pull off. The same kind thing was done for the characters Alex Kinter (who's supposed to be six) in "Jaws" and Claudia (who's supposed to be five) in "Interview with the Vampire".
yes, but she is close to 11 or 12 years old by the end of the play. patty was 14 or 15 when she played her on Broadway and 16 when she played helen in the 1962 version. melissa was 15 in this. a young teenager is capable of pulling it off.
Helen Keller was not mute. She could speak but she didn't know how. She went blind and death when she was one and a half doe to a high fever. She was barely old enough to speak.
Never for a minute does Gilbert make you believe she's blind. Duke seems to be just going through the motions of how she remembers the part being played.
Annie Sullivan (the teacher) had been blind as a child, and after several surgeries, her sight was restored. Helen Keller, on the other hand, was completely blind and deaf.
I think the teacher had use of only one eye. Or just enough sight in each to get around without help like this friend of mine but she didn't have fully restored sight.
They should have had Melissa Gilbert play this when she was younger, but it's still good acting.
Magic9053 1 week ago
lol...she was having the time of her life banging on the table!!
stuntgirl14 2 weeks ago
who does patty duke play? does she play annie? because it's odd....she played helen in the 1962 version
stuntgirl14 2 weeks ago
Patty Duke was way more better Helen Keller Than Melissa Gilbert.
JulzMapua 3 weeks ago
lmfao i died laughing when they both smacked each other lol pretty funny
miceinmypants123 4 months ago
they are both good. but the 1962 version is much better as everyone says. it was raw and emotional and i cried in most scenes, this one is very good but it just doesnt have that emotion that the original had.
koryosiveness 4 months ago
patty plays annie good...but she's not as tough and stern as anne bancroft was
youtuuberoxx 6 months ago
What an awesome scene! Great movie.
runly1 6 months ago
I love how her hair flies around!! Really adds to the wildness of Helen's character.
AllysonFournier 8 months ago
And all that hair swinging around is a distraction from the anger that had to be shown in this portion of the movie, I think that patty duke got Melissa beat.
Strchld2 11 months ago
i like Melissa gilbert a lot but this role wasn't for her.She was too old and not very convincing as helen.Patty duke was in 1962 even if she was a teen.She really had helen under her skin.And was just perfect in this role.Melissa gilbert wasn't.
fisteberg 11 months ago
The anger is missing. Melissa is playing a blind girl. Patty played an angry blind girl.
vintagefan92 1 year ago
@vintagefan92 ~ Yes! the anger,as well as the mannerisms of a blind--not to mention deaf!---child, are all missing. Melissa did great as Laura Ingalls, but she just didn't have it where this role was concerned. ..She should have called up Melissa Sue Anderson, who played blind sister Mary on Little House' for some pointers for the part~
tubeeorrnottubee 1 year ago
@tubeeorrnottubee EXACTLY! One would think that after playing with a "blind" girl for a while on Little House on the Prairie she would have picked up some of her techniques. I was just reading Patty's (or should I say Anna?) autobiography and according to Anna, Melissa was too "elegant" to act really crazy. Anyway, I still like Melissa Gilbert! hehe
vintagefan92 1 year ago
@vintagefan92 ~ Elegant??! LOL .. Funny, I never thought of her quite that way.. but being around her, Patty-Anna knows best! ... I wonder if she, Patty-Anna that is, was happy with the movie when all was said and done..=?
It'd be great to see the Ingalls-Wilder clan back again in a reunion for a take on "These Happy Golden Years", the last {i believe} of Laura Ingalls Wilder's memorable books. :)
tubeeorrnottubee 1 year ago
Melissa Gilbert is a very talented actress, I think she did a wonderful job as Helen Keller. For the idiots who are bad mouthing her, leave her alone she has more talent than you morons could ever hope to have.
DanteLacey21 1 year ago
I have to say' Patty deff does a hell of a better job playing Helen than Melissa Gilbert. Patty Duke was made for that role. And Anne Bandcroft for playing Annie Sullivan. I dont like this version. The orginal is better. I hate remakes of movies.
spike84able 1 year ago 2
@spike84able ~ You and me, both! Leave perfection alone~ :)
tubeeorrnottubee 1 year ago
This is not even patty duke
suqarstarx3 1 year ago
I think this shows that Patty Duke was BORN to play the role of Helen. Melissa is good, but compared to the flawless original.......
vintagefan92 1 year ago
I heard Patty Duke wannted Melissa Gilbert to play the part.. but whyyyy! I don't understand it.. ~ Bad chOice, Patty! BAD-BAD CHOICE!
tubeeorrnottubee 1 year ago
@tubeeorrnottubee Yes i agree.Very bad choice.Melissa gilbert is far too old to act helen.She's as tall as annie sullivan.Not credible.Patty duke was thousand times better in the miracle worker version of 1962.Melissa gilbert is a pale imitation.
fisteberg 1 year ago
@tubeeorrnottubee I think it was Melissa Gilbert's company who approached Patty Duke about doing it. (Melissa probably didn't even realized what she had gotten herself into!) :D
vintagefan92 1 year ago
it was funny when helen pahtooieyed the eggs in annie's face
sheepwolf2004 1 year ago
The original is so much better
tomkat0000 1 year ago 2
Oh, this version shouldn't been made. It is quite cheap imitation compared to the 1962 version (which I find the best) and little Helen is unnaturally big girl, if I'm not mistaken, even little Patty in 1962 was bigger than real Helen and this girl - oh it is a miss not a child! sometimes this scene makes me ashamed, I'm sorry to say this. Cheap, cheap, cheap! But thank you very much for this video, I'm very grateful I could compare the versions!
Etheline 1 year ago
i notice how Melissa blinks alot n in da old 1 she barely blinks
demigrl21 1 year ago
@demigrl21 ~ So true..but in the old one, Patty Duke knew how to act blind! Melissa didn't have a CLUE! She obviously didn't study well for this part.
Nansbbgrand 1 year ago
@Nansbbgrand yea like everytime i c a blind person in shows or movings they neevr rly blink but yea shes not good in the film
demigrl21 1 year ago
if i ever get to play helen in a production of this play, i think it'd be perfect for me. i have almost no hearing in my left ear and have probably 25 percent of no hearing in the right. i was also born early and was diagnosed with minor cerebral palsy, due to my not having enough time for my soft palate and hard palate to develop properly before i was born, i have moderate speech problems. not sure if this qualifies, but i wear glasses too. Can barely see without "em.
starrbeatlesqueen 1 year ago
melissa gilbert was 15/16 just like patty duke who was 16 when she played helen keller on broadway and the 1962 movie. helen is supposed to be played by a younger girl since her age stars at 7 up to 12 years old. when melissa and patty played her, they looked young enough for the part.
i want to play her if i ever see auditions for it. I am an adult now, but I look young for my age (more without makeup), so I could probably pull it off.
starrbeatlesqueen 1 year ago
No offense but this Helen sucks.
Theclowcard 1 year ago
it's a pity that they got a girl who was so old already for the part of hellen. this scene is not believable. hellen is taller than miss anne.
jenifferuchka 1 year ago
is this the one where PAtty Duke plays as Annie instead of Helen???
KayakoRox 1 year ago
love the parth where they slap eachother LOL
1kingconan 1 year ago 2
Melissa's hair is beautiful! :) It sure gets flung around in this part :D
Melisbeth86 1 year ago 2
@Melisbeth86 true
1kingconan 1 year ago
at 7:10 I LMAO
mindangel18 2 years ago
i agree with people..Its not for her. She should have stuck with Little House and kissing almazo.
This role hurt her I think
prostockgirl 2 years ago
yea it totally hurt her...
that's why she got an emmy nom. for it...?
liberty9333 2 years ago 2
shes a pretty good actress but i like patty duke
TheJujulittle 2 years ago
Patty Duke played Helen in the older version. I like that one better. :)
Gabyf555 2 years ago
This is muy horrible! You can tell this was a "get a way from the little house role." She's too old and no one can play the role like Patty Duke. (Or Anne Bancroft for that matter.)
001kmrice 2 years ago
Melissa Gilbert was a few years too old for this role. On "Little House" during this time he was already dating Almanzo.
store275 2 years ago
i love this play :D im reading it for school
lalamccallum91 2 years ago
The actress playing Helen looks a bit old. But hey...
mrshackztor 2 years ago
sdorry but you cant remake a classic patty duke played the part of helen so much better and anne bancroft the part of miss sullivan was much better to. the original movie was more convincing
78chore 2 years ago 3
Melissa Gilbert doing good act like blind.
She is cute...Little Laura is doing acting good blind Helen Keller.
Melissa Sue Anderson (Mary) and Linwood Boomer (Adam) are doing great blind couples.
lhotpgirl 2 years ago
Go Annie! Though she be but little, she be fierce--and perfectly willing to SIT on her obstreperous student if that proves necessary.
Love Melissa's hair, it works very well for the character.
Erisinia 2 years ago
Nyce :b But i like the first movie
ItsAlyssaBianca 2 years ago
i like when patty duke was helen
MissDuhWatever 2 years ago 2
man b-slap lol
luvbrianna1 2 years ago
amo a melissa
karekano12 2 years ago
which one is patty duke and which one is melissa gilbert?
goldie637 2 years ago
Patty duke played helen in the original, and she grew up to play annie in this one.
fattrannymess92 2 years ago 4
Extraodinaria pelicula
karekano12 2 years ago
melissa gilbet es una mamasita
karekano12 2 years ago
I like the first one way better. Bancroft and Duke were completely their characters. No holds bared.
Also in the first one this scene was one long ass scene and they went at it for 9 min. straight.
ACTINGDRAMA 2 years ago
i didn't know mellisa was in th
gsgsgstdsss 2 years ago
I envy Patty Duke for getting to slap Melissa Gilbert. I wanted to do the same every time I saw Little House on the Prairie.
yieldyieldyield 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
why is it no one talks to or about the black maid there in the movie? She is in the movie and is never mentioned, pissed me off!
kimmarie801 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Was mellisa blind in the show?
harvestmoon10 3 years ago
I like the 1963 version much better (who doesn't) but Patty Duke and Melissa Gilbert really are rather good in the roles!
I guess the original just seemed more barbaric and dark. This one just seems too tame but is still good nonetheless.
estupido7490 3 years ago 16
@estupido7490 I think the first one was more realistic and Patty Duke did a much better job grasping the role than Melissa Gilbert did.
ccmeu 1 year ago
I remember the breakfast scene and the water pump scene at the end most vividly...
Man, it makes me tired just watching it, LOL! Can't imagine how exhausting it was to actually act it out!
DarlingNikki2 3 years ago 4
i liked the first movie better
lexmarkpavilion 3 years ago 3
I don't think Miss Sullivan's heart was in it, when she signed "good girl". LOL It's quite amazing the way Helen Keller turned out in her life, though!
littlelily613 3 years ago
i'm playing Helen Keller in my school's production of this, and i am nervous beyond belief. doing my best to study realistic mannerisms and such, though; i do not want to overdo it so that people cant take it seriously.
betweenthebarsxo 3 years ago
ya a young teenager is but it is still amazing cause the only other thing she was in besides this that i know of was little house on the prarie so this is absolutly amazing for her!!!!
RockStarxxx7 3 years ago
On 6:25, she like, " bitch, I don't want to eat with no damn spoon. I want to eat with my hands dammit. That's what she's saying right there.
reeree10488 3 years ago 3
is hellen keller the girl?
poshislove 3 years ago
yup.
suceyourselfbatch 3 years ago
I didn't think that Helen Keller couldn't make any noise. I thought she could scream. She was just deaf and blind, so she was unable to learn to speak. Throughout this scene she doesn't utter a single cry... so I gues she couldn't, or wouldn't.
Rowan07001484 3 years ago
in italiano no?
valentinartoa 3 years ago
in the original movie, annie didn't let helen eat from the plate with her hands at first.
starrbeatlesqueen 3 years ago
i love melissa's long hair in this. so pretty.
starrbeatlesqueen 3 years ago 3
This is total crap compared to the original B&W version.
BillyL96 3 years ago
This scene plays more like comedy compared to the black and white version, which was more powerful and believable.
FunWithStuttering 3 years ago 3
Democrats would call this "child abuse"
ryebosco 3 years ago
your face is child abuse
Couragegirl76 3 years ago 8
haha. :?
starrbeatlesqueen 3 years ago
What is this??? When Patty was Helen and Anne Bancroft Annie Sullivan, it was much better- this hasn't even a half of the action of the first movie! That scene form the one from 1962 was quick,shocking, you were tired with them but this...I'm very sorry to say this,but I am really NOT satisfied with this.
Etheline 3 years ago 4
Everyone on my uni course has had to film this scene as a project... It's so repetetive on paper!
Mine was set in the 70s with 'Henry' having had his eyes drilled out
simonjeffery13 3 years ago
wow...i just finished watching this same scene from the older version of this movie....patty duke played helen keller then, this time she plays annie
loveandhate93 3 years ago
helen is supposeb be 6 years old
angelgirl8888 3 years ago
You're right, but from what I've heard, the playwright changed Helen's age to twelve so a teenager could portray her, as the role would be difficult for an actual six-year-old to pull off. The same kind thing was done for the characters Alex Kinter (who's supposed to be six) in "Jaws" and Claudia (who's supposed to be five) in "Interview with the Vampire".
Jal8919536 3 years ago
OK i understand thanks for your answer : )
angelgirl8888 3 years ago
yes, but she is close to 11 or 12 years old by the end of the play. patty was 14 or 15 when she played her on Broadway and 16 when she played helen in the 1962 version. melissa was 15 in this. a young teenager is capable of pulling it off.
starrbeatlesqueen 3 years ago
OMG! the actress of Little House on the Prairie is acting as Helen Keller!
goodcartoons4u 3 years ago
of course.. if it wasnt for Anne Sullivan she couldnt do it alone!
jixtuRko1905 3 years ago
Helen Keller is a life story for me I think she really broke down the walls of darkness with the help of Anne Sullivan
Royal070974 3 years ago 4
i love melissas hair!
jecka1982 4 years ago 3
she looks too old and not eve nblind i like hte black and white version better
briahna93 4 years ago 5
helen in this movie looks too old and does not look blind
hhaawwttaayy 4 years ago 5
when patty played helen, she didn't pull that hard.
starrbeatlesqueen 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Gay
dyonker 4 years ago
I love when they slap each other!! I also love Melissa's beautifel long hair.
DeathEaterSelena 4 years ago 2
Beautiful hair dance !
spatulenbois 4 years ago
Helen Keller was not mute. She could speak but she didn't know how. She went blind and death when she was one and a half doe to a high fever. She was barely old enough to speak.
Shuarru 4 years ago
I remember seeing this and I didn't understand what was this girl's problem until I found that was helen keller who is blind, deaf and mute.
Gothiczartan 4 years ago
This was my first introduction to the Helen Keller story (years ago)- and it made a deep, lasting impression... Thank you for posting these clips..
(And "merci" Caroline, for reminding me of Helen Keller's beautiful story)
ymihere222 4 years ago
Never for a minute does Gilbert make you believe she's blind. Duke seems to be just going through the motions of how she remembers the part being played.
CliffordCarson 4 years ago
well she was only parcialy (?) blind not fully only light hurt her eyes she could see fine besides that
pershnickety 4 years ago
Annie Sullivan (the teacher) had been blind as a child, and after several surgeries, her sight was restored. Helen Keller, on the other hand, was completely blind and deaf.
musicaltheatergeek79 4 years ago
yea, i watched the older movie in school, cause we were reading the book about it, i liked the movie beter cause there was popcorn and soda.
wwePITBULLwwe 3 years ago
Don't we all. ; )
Jal8919536 3 years ago
I think the teacher had use of only one eye. Or just enough sight in each to get around without help like this friend of mine but she didn't have fully restored sight.
ToeIn2194 2 years ago