Added: 4 years ago
From: dizzo95
Views: 232,254
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (123)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @tunatunaable what you describe there is known as luck, sorry to break it to you.

  • Watch Immune Response, Toll Like Receptors (TLR) Pathway in an animated format, just type imgenex in youtube search

  • 1:20 "the antibodies destroy antigens" FALSE !! Antibodies by themselves don't destroy antigens.

  • I completely agree with akattaha78. Hypersensitivity is not a immune mechanisms. It is an immune pathology. There are two types of immune systems, the innate and the acquired

  • inforce1.com to help buid your immuine system

  • If you guys really wanna beef up your immune system, you should try this juice I'm drinking!

    It gives your white blood cells a coat of armour & a machine gun!

    Just go to juiceberg's channel & ask them about it!

  • @knightrain1000 No. And white blood cells outside the body are actually just pus, which is gross :)

  • @GirlUnknownDead Pus is a result of dead white blood cells, which have died after fighting with infection, etc.

  • U r wrong.

  • um T cells do not produce antibodies as it said just before the end

  • I would just like to say comments on these videos are more logical, intelligent conversation/debate and less "lol u suck noob" comments. Well done.

  • **** WARNING****

    this video is inaccurate..

    it is describing the four different types hypersensitivity reactions NOT the general immune mechanisms..

    please change the title..

  • What ever happened to sensitisation and isotype switching? not nearly enough detail in this video.

  • this debate here.

    You fail. Waste of time.

  • Medications can help control and/or rid of certain medical illnesses.

    I.e. Ibuprofen--for allergies to keep them under control and Tetracycline (antibiotics) for common illnesses. Keep in mind however, that not all bugs need drugs, so doctors do not always prescribe antibiotics to patients.

  • "This information is probably not allowed in medical journals as it is false and there is no supporting evidence."

    That one statement makes me wonder if I should waste anymore of my time with you. They already got you. The Medical Journal is your Bible, your God, nothing else exists outside of this book for you. That gives me no motivation to show you my findings, these are just things you will have to wait and see as it slowly surfaces in 60yrs or more, or as you slowly become enlightened.

  • It is also quite an assumption to say that MD's are not trained in herbology. Although they do not undergo this training in med school, they may have a background in the field of herbology. So to say they are not trained is not true in it's

    entirety.

  • 98% of MDs & veterinarians spend far too much time just keeping up with their medical practice to study alternative medicine. Most actually do know that there is an industry that threatens theirs yet to keep patients (customers) they must never acknowledge these things. A small % of MDs actually care about people & healing. These MDs switch sides & go into the natural healing because they see it is superior & is truly better for the patient.

  • where did you get these facts from? You are basing your views soley on your assumptions. Here's a tip, don't argue abouta topic if you have nothing to back your argument up with. These facts don't prove anything. They are inaccurate.

  • This is wrong as you stated that doctors are not trained in herbology. Therefore, why would they prescribe what you call natural meedications? And you are forgetting that doctors cannot divert from their medical protocol. So if they prescribe natural or herbal medications than they would be diverting from there protocol as you state that they are not trained in herbal medicine.

  • You made my point. When I originally said nutrition I meant nutritional healing in which I meant to imply herbal/nutritional healing which is my point, MDs are not trained in that by the medical association therefore ignorant of true healing from within. You think drugs are all that heals but the above statement is indisputable

  • No I do not think that. I said they aid in helping patients.

  • alternative solution. These medications can infact help you. Most medications on the Pharmaceutical market out weigh negative risks to patients.

  • Most meds are prescribed as a band aid to a more serious problem. Almost never does the Dr actually get to the root of the problem but they treat symptoms only. Often times they detect problems that will become serious but allow the patient to sit on that problem until it is serious then refer surgery getting a kick back. All we are is walking cash cows for them, they actually dont want anybody to ever get well but to keep that revolving door spinning

  • Again wrong. Doctors use their intellegence, the Pharmaceutical medications and testing/ diagnostic equipmen, such as ultrasounds, CT scanning equipment and X-Rayst to aid them to conclude what is wrong with the patient. Everytime I go to the doctor, I come out with great results.

  • Comment removed

  • Read the inserts on the drugs, in fact watch the US commercials where the drug companies are required to state all side affects, its a riot.

    Migraine medicine may cause headaches.

    Sleep aid may cause bloody stools & kidney damage. It's like right out of a comedy skit, I laugh every time I see them & say "There's no way I am touching that drug" What a wasted commercial but then I suppose there are a few that would say, I'll give my left kidney just to get a good nights sleep.

  • Yes all most every medication has side effects.

  • Also these medications say that these side effects MAY infact occur, it does not say they WILL occur, but they MAY.

  • They may occur yes and I know that percentage is small but do you really want to be in that percentage that just because you wanted a good nights sleep you now require dialysis?

  • There is no proof. of this. It has been reported that patients who use these medications rarely develop symptoms or encounter negative side effects of these medications. Only a small percentage of patients do. And keep in mind that some of these medications advertised on TV are experimental. That's why doctors rarely precribe them.

  • "Only a small percentage of patients do"

    You don't know what you are talking about. Thoudsands of people die as a result of properly prescribed medication in the USA alone, every year. Merck's Vioxx drug reportedly killed some 55'000 people. It urned out that Merck had falsified the safety trial results. I won't even go into the vaccine-holocaust.

  • I do know what I am talking about. Merck's Vioxx drug "reportedly," killed 55;000 people. So when you say reportedly that may mean not sure. Also you have to question this drug. Where was it manufactured? Was it approved by the F.D.A.? This is only an example of one drug. With taking any form of medication there is usually a risk.

  • "So when you say reportedly that may mean not sure"

    Right. It's the estimated number of Vioxx deaths reported.

    My point is that drugs can be dangerous and that drug use should be minimised or eliminated altogether, if possible. many people resort to drugs for headaches, sleeplessness, depression etc which may alleviate the problem, but doesn't address the cause. Also, there are usually more natural alternatives, like herbs, yoga, meditation etc.

  • True. Some drugs can be dangerous and should be used when necessary. I suggest staying away from herbal medications. They can at tims be more harmful than actual drugs. If you eliminated prescribed medicatons all together, the results could be catastrophic.

  • It's not that they are "more harmful" it's that no one has really studied them, and they are unregulated so you pretty much have to use at your own risk.

  • You bring up a good point. However, a lot of doctors suggest to stay away from hebal medications as they usually do not work and are medications to just waste money on. Some forms of these herbal/ homeopathic treatments are suggested as they are proven to work with little or no risk to the patient. Other meds however, are said to not be used as they can potentially be more harmful to a patient rather than making them better. Even with dedicated research, some of these herb meds are not suggested

  • @TRIXSTER03 (First of all, my english is not really good) I agrre with this comment, and in my country (Argentina) the recepy is needed even if you want to buy a herbal medication. A few years ago someone started importing this type of medicaton from United States, but it's not popular yet. I hope it won't get popular (sooo many gramaticals errors, sorry!!!! Hope you understand!!!

  • marijuana made my symtoms worst I HATE STUPID WEED!!!!

  • Medical marijunana can help ease peoples pain. However, on another note, using recreational drugs for long term periods can increase the risk of cancers and diseases.

  • She said all surgery procedures of any kind have these waivers. I swear, the next time I paint a Doctors house my contract will say that he does not hold me liable for damage or poor workmanship, that's exactly what they make their customers sign, I should do the same.

  • That is a poor example. Doctors are not necessarily getting people to sign these waivers because they will screw up, it's more so because it's the law.

  • 15yrs ago I went in and was ready for Lasic until I got to the contract (disclaimer) There was a 3% failure rate & I was signing that I would not hold them liable if they screwed up. My mouth dropped, I said, You could make me blind, I would lose my job, I still owe you $2500 & I can't claim compensation? I said no way am I doing this. The receptionist said 3% is very small, I said, I am not taking that chance with no safety net.

  • With everything their is a negative. 3% is a small percentage. The liability forms are to cover their ass. Not only to cover their screw ups, but things that may occur with medications, etc. This comment really has no relevance to anything we are discussing.

  • "3% is a small percentage"

    Yes, but if you are one of the 3 % then obviously the risk obviously wasn't worth taking.

    If you are foolish enough to run the risk, up to you; FreeGlobalEnergy is obviously not prepared to take the risk. Up to him.

  • That's right, the risk is up to him. However you are missing the key point of what we were discussing. We were discussing insurance waivers that protect medical staff. With any surgery there is risks. However, with that being said, the positive impacts outweigh the negative ones. However there is still risks. It is up to the individual to decide whether or not they want to take a risk. That's what these waivers cover.

  • Sorry, I may have jumped in without referring to the original point made. Yes, I do agree with you. It's up to the individual and waivers, which must/should go along with informed consent, are quite in order. That's why I don't really agree with vaccine injury compensation. When parents sign the consent form, they agree that they accept any consequences of the vaccination, be it illness, incapacitation, brain-damage or death.

  • Well, when anyone signs a consent form you obviously have to be of legal age, and these waivers are to cover the health-care workers, the hospital or clinics ass and finally, they are required by law. With taking almost any prescribed medication and almost any form of a vaccine, there may be risk to the patient. However, although there may be distinct risks that could potentially be harmful, the postive risks usually outweigh the negative risks.

  • Lol, i'm naive. No I am not. You are. NOT EVERY DISEASE TODAY IS CURABLE. that is the most abhorrent thing I have ever heard. For example, is HIV/AIDS curable, Is CANCER curable? no. You are completely wrong. I do infact know how things function as play a role in the medical field. What you are stating is basically just an idiotic theory, with no solid evidence.

    You really need to study up on modern medicine.

  • Yes aids and cancer are curable but you got your head stuck in the drug controlled medical journal & brainwashed by the industry. I deal with people like you on so many topics. Very few are actually interested in exploring what goes on outside of the little bubble worlds they create for themselves & love to argue tirelessly their limited knowledge. If I refer you to some things will you watch the videos?

  • No, THEY ARE NOT CURABLE. YOU ARE CONFUSING TREATABLE WITH CURABLE. For example, you can get cancer treated by using radiation to kill cancer cells. However that does not mean that the inital cancer or other cancers will not re-appear or start. You are confusing treatable with curable. AIDS AND CANCER ARE NOT CURABLE. And sure I will watch the videos. I would like to see what information in presented.

  • Ok, finally I get to the post where you asked to see the information I have. I need time to compile it & I will email it to you if your email is set to allow me to. I can't insert web addresses here. This information is not allowed in any medical journals therefore one needs to decide if they trust the source.

    When I was young MDs called chiropractors quacks. Mds shunned nutrition, you are right on some fronts, I have been surprised some of the things medical facilities do now indulge in

  • This information is probably not allowed in medical journals as it is false and there is no supporting evidence.

  • Watch my youtube series 'Vaccination: Miracle or Mayhem? Parts 1 - 5'. Vaccines have never protected anyone, let alone saved anyone's life. It's all a despicable and very dangerous racket.

  • if you have kids and believe this should be put and jail and kids put with someone more resposible

  • 1.

    Actually vaccines are a proven method to build immunity in case you encounter the actual virus that might normally kill you but there is a vast cover up on the effects they do have on a certain % of the population. Some batches are bad but still distributed, some children are sensitive to the mercury, actually all of us are effected but some severely.

  • NOT ALL VIRUSES KILL

  • That does not need to be said, I said viruses that MIGHT kill you, hence some that might not

  • 2.

    There is a lie that pets require tri-yearly vaccines, wrong T-cell memory remembers the very first vaccine, it does not need boosters, one vaccine for life, lots of lies for profit.

  • Really? Can you prove that vaccines do not protect against disease? Vaccines do infact work and aid in preventing disease and illnesses from occuring.

    You fail

  • if you donate blood will your body rebuild the lost antibodies if you no longer suffer from those antigens?

  • T-cells don't make antibodies you fucking prat. What kind of cunt makes an incorrect science vid??

  • B lymphocytes make anti-bodies. T cells more towards killing virus,tumor cells and subtype Helper T cells enhances the production of Antibodies by B cells.

  • T-Cells remember how a previous virus battle was fought FOR LIFE.The T-cells will stimulate anti-bodies so fast for a re-introduction to a virus you may never know you re-encountered it,Which is why the whole Titers & Booster shots are a total drug company sham. You do not need detectable anti-bodies floating in the blood non stop. They disappear. Doesn't matter. T-cells do not need boosters but they will instantly trigger reproduction of anti-bodies. Those pet boosters. A Big Lie,Dont need it

  • goog

  • This is the basis of immunisation against tuberculosis??!! The BCG vaccina against TB was found to be not only completely useless decades ago, in a huge WHO field trial in India, causing (most) countries to abandon its use, but was also found to be CAUSING TB, rather than preventing it. Mind you, otherr vaccines are just as useless it's just that medical science refuses to pull its head out of the sand (or its arse).

  • This video makes it sound as if scientists know how the immune system works, when in fact they know very little. Let's face it, most of them are even stupid enough to believe the lie that vaccines prevent diseases.

  • You have no significant medical evidence to prove this. As a matter of fact, you present no evidence at all.

  • WAIT!!!

    I know that voice!!!

    Ofcourse, It's Hal!!!

    Dave... Dave... Don't do it Dave.

    You know, the movie Space Odesy 2000

  • whoever made that video is a space monkey

  • When you eat cooked foods the body responds as if an antigen is attacking the body. The enzyme free foods stressed the bodies digestion and wears our enzyme production. Eating foods that are living like raw vegetables does not cause this reaction. Doctors do not learn about nutrition and fail to treat illness because they only sell drugs. Take charge of our own health and stop eating foods that only cause inflammation and diesease.

  • what are you talking about? please talk to your doctor and he'll clear up all your confusion.

  • You didnt read the statement:

    ¨Doctors do not learn about nutrition and fail to treat illness because they only sell drugs¨.

    Why would you suggest he talk to his doctor when Doctors are drug pushers & medical schools teach lies that avoid healing but promote disease to boost industry sales?

  • this is not true you loon

    as a nurse i had 8 hours of nutrition in 2 years doctors have more

  • Did that training teach you that to cure cancer you need mass doses of vit c discovered in the 70s? now discovered that an alkaline solution of 8.0 reverses cancerous tumors? Perhaps I needed to rephrase my statement but No doctor ever prescribes natural supplements to dissolve plaque in the arteries it is always a drug to treat symptoms never a cure for what caused the problem in the first place but symptomatic treatment and surgeries.

  • Not every illness/ disease can be cured. That's why we have something called, "MEDICAL RESEARCH."

  • Every disease today is curable but there is massive industry created for the treatment. You have no idea just how massive this industry is. Billions of dollars are generated for research. The people involved in research want job security so most involved at the bottom waste time & may even sweep the "cure" under the rug to squeeze out a few more years of employment. You are very naive to what really takes place & how things actually function.

  • Comment removed

  • Currently there is no cure for cancer. However it can be treated.

  • Wrong. Cancer can and has been cured, and when I say cured I mean killed, remission, never to come back, naturally not with radiation. Like I said you live in a bubble world of false realities.

  • Lol that is the most ridculous comment I have ever heard. CANCER HAS BEEN TREATED NOT CURED THAT'S WHY YOU HEAR CANCER AGENCIES SAYING FIND A CURE FOR CANCER. ALTHOUGH CANCER HAS BEEN TREATED WITH SUCH THINGS AS RADIATION, IT CAN COME BACK IN THE SAME FORM OR IN OTHER FORMS.

    Did you know every human has cancer cells in his or her body. It just takes things such as smoking to activate these cells.

  • You don't know what I know, you are basing that on your limited knowledge

  • My limited knowledge? Ya okay. I actually have quite extensive and true knowledge of the topis I am debating about. I am quite well informed.

  • And your statement is really hilarious.

    8 hours of nutritional training out of all your training is nothing to brag about.

    There is a mass amount of knowledge to be obtained in alternative nutritional healing and 8 hours is a complete and utter joke, and yes alternative healing is just that, a cure for what is actually causing the symptoms, an MD is only good for a massive band aid and he will blame problems on genetics because he lacks sufficient training found in nutritional healing.

  • I do want to commend doctors on their emergency skills after they mislead people throughout their lives until conditions come to the point of requiring emergency care or transplants. But hey, it's business like any other and everybody needs repeat business and between MDs and the drug companies they insure a constant revolving door that is highly profitable... 8 hrs nutritional training, LOL, LOL, LOL, ROL.

  • No you are wrong. Doctors actually have oaths to care for the sick and wounded and they are sworn to uphold that oath for what it represents. Doctors do treat patients and they also mainly focous on diagnosing patients. Doctors use MEDICATIONS to help treat, control or cure, illnesses or disease.

    Finally, doctors do learn about nutrition. For example, when you have a particular vitamin deficiency doctors will tell you what food is best to eat in order to bring the level back up to normal.

  • Doctors take oaths, Do you mean like when someone takes an oath in a court of law? Yeah, that sure has stopped all people from lying in court hasnt it? Oaths mean absolutely nothing. The things that matter most to a doctor is peer reviews or peer pressure & following protocol

  • Comment removed

  • An oath in the court of law and a medical oath (hippocratic oath) are entirely different.

  • A

    some doctors see oath-taking as little more than a pro-forma ritual with little value beyond that of upholding tradition. "The original oath is redolent of a covenant, a solemn and binding treaty," writes Dr. David Graham in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association (12/13/00). "By contrast, many modern oaths have a bland, generalized air of 'best wishes' about them, being near-meaningless formalities devoid of any influence on how medicine is truly practiced."

  • B

    Some physicians claim what they call the "Hippocratic Oath" should be radically modified or abandoned altogether.

  • "Doctors use MEDICATIONS to help treat, control or cure, illnesses or disease. "

    Sometimes but more often the synthetic drugs cause more harm & more disease. Synthetic drugs are possibly all derived from herbs. Herbs are the true original healers that are balanced by nature, deriving a synthetic form is not balanced & causes severe stress on other organs requiring an endless array of drugs to balance out the effects of the other at times causing organ failure, MDs are licensed drug pushers.

  • nope. Altoguh certain medications may have an effect on people, (i.e., Vomiting, increased risk for heart problems, etc, thue use of these medications can out weigh the negative risks.

  • You are correct, but you are only correct in a world where only drugs exist on the planet & not herbs & roots. You are not trained, nor is any MD trained in herbology simply because it does not benefit the drug controlled medical industry. Then there is the peer review if you do anything to destroy the drug industry

  • That's quite an assumption to tell me that I am not trained in herbology.

    You didn't ask.

    However I am not trained in herbology, and that is simply because these "HERBAL DOCTORS," really do not undergo any form of medical training. The minimal training they undergo if any, does not compare to that of a licensed doctor. A doctors training is much more extensive thatn that of a herbal doctor. Anyone can basically call themselves a herbal doctor.

  • The assumption is extremely easy to Pin Point. Anybody with sufficient knowledge in herbology & natural healing is fully aware that these methods are superior to any drug treatment. The things I have seen makes modern medicine pure quackery & that is how I view my Dr is a quack, that's why I only use him for the simple stuff like drawing blood to send it to the lab but you don't want to learn these things as it would collapse your industry that the elite fight to keep in place

  • What? You are strange. You keep implying that I am brainwashed by the industry, and doctors. No, that's wrong like everything else you have stated. Finally, you said you would refer me tosome videos and yet you haven't. This shows that you do not have any evidence or knowledge to back up your argument/ theory.

  • I haven't referred you yet because you never told me that you would take the time to view them with an open mind... and I wonder if that is possible for you or if it is too late. There is a point where people are open to learning but that closes at some point when they feel they have obtained ultimate knowledge in one arena of life. Will you patiently sit, watch the vids & consider the legitimacy?

  • I did infact say I would take a look at the videos to see what information is present. Read the comment.

  • Ok give me time to compile them, I am turning in soon and hopefully by tomorrow evening I'll get the info to you. I hope that you patiently watch each one them, reference them with additional study as if you really care to learn more about the kind of studies that have taken place and events that took place in early 1900s as well. If I hear from you the same evening I will know you glanced quickly at them & did not even consider the information wasting my time, I hope you don't do that

  • I will look at them if you have them. If I get back to you the same evening it means that your research is not relevant and is false. Which based on your current arguments, the information you have provided is all false.

  • I just realized you are in Canada. These are American Drs I am talking about. I use my Dr to take blood tests and if he wants me to take a drug I refuse, I then go to a nutritionist for advice who suggests various herbs. My Dr never talks to me about nutrition he is more concerned about pushing drugs. Maybe its different in Canada because the whole of America is corrupt to the core.

  • Well, I do totally disagree with parts of the American medical system, however, American Medicine and Canadian Medicine are quite similar. For example, we follow the same Heart and Stroke regulations, etc. This is your choice, but I highly advise you not to believe everything your nutritionist tells you. It is proven that some of these organic herbs can make initial medical problems worse. When you go to your doctor, if he/she wants to prescribe drugs, and you don't want them, then ask for an

  • And yet, when you get severely sick, YOU go and see the doctor anyways.

  • Like I said above, I commend doctors or paramedics on their emergency skills, They can start a heart & and have a whole array of drugs they use in an emergency. They are useful for correcting birth abnormalities carried on into adulthood or emergency care when an ignorant public fills their arteries with plaque & needs emergency bypass but other than deformities all these ailments are curable if treated before it is serious

  • Yes, but paramedics and doctors do not use drugs in every situation. Drugs do not neccesarily correct birth abnormalities. However they can help. Again, not everything is curable. You are confusing treatable with curable.

  • I figured you would read into what I was saying, When I say doctors that also includes surgeons & what I was referring to is perhaps a heart that has a problem that was a birth defect. No alternative medicine will cure that & sometimes will require surgery.

  • Do research on food, not drugs and you will know what I am talking about.

  • Truly awful, i'm a teacher and there's no way i'm going to be using this on Monday!

    FYI helper T cells stimulate B cells to divide, then the B cells secrete antibodies. Killer T cells 'search out' cells that have been invaded by pathogens and then destroy those infected cells.

    Also, your voice is super-boring.

  • if u r going to make a video about inmunology u should read and prepare better the video... >_> and the other idiots who dont know anything about inmune response plz dont write anything stupid... shame on you!

  • the only message you can take from this video: they are different types responses.

  • You helped me so much with this video:D I had a Biology project on this and I did so well I got like a 94% yay Thanks :D

  • u got 94% with this shitty information? ... where do u study ... ur teaker should be an asshole xD

  • u got 94% with this shitty information? ... where do u study ... ur teaker should be an asshole xD

  • Why on earth would someone create an incorrect science vid? T-cells making antibodies :( oh deary me

  • What an ignorant has created this...!?! This is a bunch of misconceptions and shortcuts in whitch the truth is completely mixed with some beliefs, but not knowledge... worthless! and what is more - very harmful to the state of public knowledge, if anyone treats it seriously...(

  • can you list some of the flaws in this video please?

  • It is a terrible video, but not wholly incorrect either. As a basic primer in immunology it fails to describe innate and acquired immune responses, which is central to understanding the types of immune responses. The worst part, I think, is that it fails to detail the response of dendritic cells and macrophages to antigens and antigen presentation to T-cells and the role of T-cells in initiating B-cell responses.

  • thanks for the reply!

  • o dear god kill me now!! lol we watched that in bio the other day!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more