9/11 WTC impossible speeds confirmed

[Chadtheman624]

Flight 175 descended into manhattan at 10000 FT PER/MIN therefore accelerating greatly

[cheerdiver]

@Chadtheman624 U r so FOS!

[anthonyc31]

excellent research ... thanks for posting.

[M4RKETEX]

What if the plane DIVED from 30000ft and then levelled out, what speed would it do then??

In WWII propeller driven planes approached the speed of sound (approx 700mph) when diving.

[horror11]

@M4RKETEX well ask the pilot who is missing a g force suit, like the fighter jet pilots have to wear to do this kind of maneuvers, beside the missing parts of the plane wich would continue to dive till the ground and refuse to fly level :)

[lukealandrummond]

@M4RKETEX Well this plane wasn't diving was it? It just cruised from the Airport 11 minutes away

[s88fifo]

@911letsroll

thats a neg.

what was shown by the networks was airplanes

coming in horisental. apologie for any misspelling.

btw, made a 90 degree turn, befor impact on the 2nd tower.

[911letsroll]

@s88fifo

even tho i cant remember what this comment was refering to no plane made a 90 degree turn into the second tower :) false.

[s88fifo]

God Bless you Jeff!

[Frasure3000]

strapped*

[Frasure3000]

lastly, a passenger on one of the planes said they saw one of the hijackers with bombs trapped on him. NOW, DOESN'T THAT SOUND FAMILIAR? not only were they hijackers, they also were suicide bombers.

[Octopi1]

They're not at sea level? Iunno. How high were the floors that they hit? And I'd like to know how they were figuring those speeds, just off the record. I'm not being a tard here, I just likie mah facts in one shoe.

[Moreofthesamez]

@Octopi1 the pentagon impact was at sea level

[DickChambers69]

They can travel at those speeds at that altitude, its just not advisable.

the planes weren't flying at sea level.

[Frasure3000]

exactly.

[agentzippo]

Did you hear what the guy just said? He said 100% impossible...

[DickChambers69]

He's 100% wrong, agentzippo.

[fakeham]

I have to admit this is interesting but if you look on the last scene of the planes hitting the towers on this video, you can see the wings make contact with the building, so unless it was a very cleverly disguised missle, it had to have been a plane. personally, I think the plane might have had a bomb on it

[Frasure3000]

the terrorists said they had bombs on board. i don't why the conspiracists forget about that.

[fakeham]

no one knows what the terrorists said or didn't say, except maybe from the phone calls from flight 93

[Frasure3000]

your statement is completely false. completely false. yes, there was passengers and flight attendants saying they heard the hijakcers say they have bombs on board. not only that, it is well-documented that on one of the planes, the hijacker accidently, while trying to broadcast it to the passengers on the speaker, said they had bombs on board to the air traffic controllers. not only that, their conversations are recorded on transcripts.

[fakeham]

anyone can record a phone call and don't you find it odd that the terrorists would "accidentally" tell the air traffic control that they had bombs? I think at least that was rigged

[Frasure3000]

so tell me what that passenger saw when he saw bombs strapped on a hijacker. tell what me what he heard when the hijacker said they had bombs on board. tell me.

[fakeham]

he says the structure of the plane can't withsatnd that amount of force, even if the were diving, the wings would have broken

[911letsroll]

the wings wouldnt of broken off. thats a very low statement to make. planes have dived from 35000 feet without any part of the plane breaking off. ofcorse the ones im refering to were intentionally crashed. im just saying.

[Veloce3]

Great Vid. It serves to highlight a number of key points, but for me two in particular. Firstly the ignorance and gullibility of the General public and secondly the irrefutable existence of evidence that discredits the official conspiracy theory. My concern is that we the control that has been imposed throughout the world will ultimately ensure that this atrocity will simply fade into the history books and that the perpetrators will not be held accoutable

[911letsroll]

"oh i got one for u" the gash in pa in 1994 doesnt even match the gash created from fright 93. just because they are near the same area means nothing. which means that whatever u thought ud get by pointing out a hole in the ground u wont. hell even the scars are in 2 different areas and 2 diff directions. "use your brain."

[JCHP4G15]

You got to remember that the second plane took a nose dive...

[spurlicke04]

As a conspiracy theorist I agree completely with the information in this video, but this seems completely staged..

[tonydayna]

hi you call yourself a conspiracy theorist but you've never head of Jeff Hill? this is not staged, please liseten to the jeff hill evan fairbanks phone call, and please look up jeff hill

[spurlicke04]

Ben Eadie doesn't ask him any questions about who he is or why he's asking these questions. The Fairbanks vid is great and is obviously authentic. This vid sounds like he has talked to him before. If I had expert information that the official 911 story was false and someone was asking me questions about it I would want to be absolutely certain I wasn't dealing with a gov agent or something. I've also cold called people before and no one wants to talk about anything not knowing who you are...

[tonydayna]

"The Fairbanks vid is great and is obviously authentic." wow haha i could make a more realistic video than that. I downloaded that video on dvd, i put it in my dvd player, i zoomed in 100X, that plane is obvious CGI, if u zoom in on the plane, the 'air craft' has no nose.

[BoardFlipper5150]

@tonydayna what i have a problem with is if someone calls me asking questions i wanna know who it is, therefore STAGED

[theCRIMSON12]

i, as a truther as well, cannot see why, if these WERE faked with CGI, why no one in all of new york city with the almost 8.3 MILLION people living there, that not ONE person has tried to put up a video and say "Planes didn't fly into the WTC towers." in ALL other cases at least ONE person has said something, anything. i know the pentagon was NOT hit by a plane, more like a missile, and all of those witnesses who said otherwise were probably soldiers or undercover police officers (cont.)

[tonydayna]

view my other uploads'

[theCRIMSON12]

what about them?

[theCRIMSON12]

because there was an esteemed professor at a university talking about the conspiracy to a radio station and they brought up the fact that no one saw anyone planting pieces of plane on the perfectly clean lawn, and he said that when he was a marine officer he could have gotten all 300 of his recruits to sign a sworn affidavit saying that bruce wayne drove the batmobile into the side of the pentagon. That also means that anyone interviewed on the day of the attack is not trustworthy