In this case Palmer is moving laterally and is attempting to clear the ball. However, that effort is insufficient and Power is prevented from playing the shot from the winning position he was in. Correct decision is Stroke to Power.
he moved into palmer instead of trying to play the ball. He could have got through with no contact. Also his feet aren't set to hit the ball, he is too far away to hit the ball cleanly when asking "let"...
Power moves forward looking for the stroke, I think he should of just played it when he got there, plenty of room would of won the point anyway more than likely. two class players !!
Its a Let. Why? Simple: Power was NOT prevented from playing the ball, there was only interference enroute TO the ball.(this is beacuse Palmer adrquately cleared the ball).
@spookyarn1 a player will lose the point if they are not making every effort to clear the ball, regardless of whether the interference is on the way to the ball. The exception is if the incoming player is still a considerable distance from the ball. For helpful information read not only the rules, but the guidelines issued with them. Also, I recommend purchasing the WSF Calling the Shots DVD.
@SquashReferee And what happens if the ref feels that Power took a pretty unnatural path to the ball in order to bump into Palmer ( thus preventing him from clearing )?
@hashkenhabib in that case: Yes, Let. If an outgoing player is prevented from clearing because of the incoming players quick movement onto the ball, then Yes, Let is the appropriate decision. Here, the line to the ball that Power is taking is not unnatural. He is not required to arc around Power.
power tried to reach the bal with his left leg but palmer is in power's way so power can't hit the ball comfortable, that's why it seems that power runs against palmer, thats why I thinks is let, and power pick the ball up with the racket at its first boot so, he could reach the ball.
let
Personalnil 6 months ago
not even close to a stroke.
fLcGambit 8 months ago
LET ONLY PEOPLE TRUST ME
thetigerbenji 9 months ago
In this case Palmer is moving laterally and is attempting to clear the ball. However, that effort is insufficient and Power is prevented from playing the shot from the winning position he was in. Correct decision is Stroke to Power.
SquashReferee 11 months ago
point Palmer
aandreiiitta 1 year ago
definitely a let
A1B2C3D4E5m 1 year ago
let~
Eric033011 1 year ago
the correct call is let, but power really should have played it cause there was minimal contact and he would have had a shot at hitting a winner
delaliom 1 year ago
its just a let you dumass's
jakalmanman 1 year ago
The correct call should be No Let.
unibrook 1 year ago
Stroke... Palmer hardly moved. Power is in a winning position, Palmer was in his way enough to cause a distraction.
Herbunder 2 years ago
is let .
isso e let, power procura o estrole e palmer sai rapidamente , a bola ainda tava longe para o power faser seu golpe
kevinjiujitsu 2 years ago
that is neither a let nor a stroke. Power could have reached to hit the ball avoiding Palmer.
sahil3 2 years ago
let!
he moved into palmer instead of trying to play the ball. He could have got through with no contact. Also his feet aren't set to hit the ball, he is too far away to hit the ball cleanly when asking "let"...
90JEVANS90 2 years ago
No Let
gkh004 3 years ago
Stroke
basaintl 3 years ago
Power moves forward looking for the stroke, I think he should of just played it when he got there, plenty of room would of won the point anyway more than likely. two class players !!
squashlegend07 3 years ago 2
Stroke, Power was on the ball too quickly.
squashkid6 3 years ago
no let
phil8496 3 years ago
That is a stroke, no question...
Power is definitely fishing for a stroke, but it's such a loose ball from Palmer that the slippery little Canadian has to have the point...
riojajunior 3 years ago
Stroke, Power is on it too quick for Palmer to clear enough.
sap1972 3 years ago
Its a Let. Why? Simple: Power was NOT prevented from playing the ball, there was only interference enroute TO the ball.(this is beacuse Palmer adrquately cleared the ball).
spookyarn1 4 years ago
his feet are set, he's ready to hit the ball, and palmer can't clear. if jonathan plays it, palmer get's a racquet in the face. stroke.
wsmvp22 3 years ago
@spookyarn1 a player will lose the point if they are not making every effort to clear the ball, regardless of whether the interference is on the way to the ball. The exception is if the incoming player is still a considerable distance from the ball. For helpful information read not only the rules, but the guidelines issued with them. Also, I recommend purchasing the WSF Calling the Shots DVD.
SquashReferee 11 months ago
@SquashReferee And what happens if the ref feels that Power took a pretty unnatural path to the ball in order to bump into Palmer ( thus preventing him from clearing )?
hashkenhabib 10 months ago
@hashkenhabib in that case: Yes, Let. If an outgoing player is prevented from clearing because of the incoming players quick movement onto the ball, then Yes, Let is the appropriate decision. Here, the line to the ball that Power is taking is not unnatural. He is not required to arc around Power.
SquashReferee 10 months ago
power tried to reach the bal with his left leg but palmer is in power's way so power can't hit the ball comfortable, that's why it seems that power runs against palmer, thats why I thinks is let, and power pick the ball up with the racket at its first boot so, he could reach the ball.
mgalle1123 4 years ago
easy stroke.
wsmvp22 4 years ago
neither. that's just a good shot from Palmer. Power can't reach that ball, so he runs against Palmer desperately.
pipiherranz 4 years ago
are you serious? Even for my standards thats a very loose drop..Power could have almost volleyed that...
Xavierthegreat666 3 years ago