I own a 2004 L322 Range Rover Vogue 3.0 td6 and i would never change it with another luxury 4x4...you dont notice if you are on a highway or of you are in the middle of the mud (and believe me i went a lot of times in medium offroad tracks, not because of the car but because im a rookie in offroading and the car has never let me down)
Even if you're going through all this rough terrain, as a driver you're like in a oasis of comfort and luxury. I mean, what's more comfortable than being gently massaged while driving through a river?
the range rovers ( acutal range rovers, not the ford ones) already come with 4 wheel differientials, standard.. range rovers are like the drill, and other offroaders are screwdirvers with perks
I used to drive a jeep grand cheroke and there was nothing wrong it them but about 2 years ago i got a Range rover sport and there is no comparison between the two the Range rover is a much better car the only other suv that mixes luxury with off roading is the Toyota land cruiser which i drove though a desert out side of Dubai although id have to say i would have rather had a Range Rover
@forstflieger The Range Rover actually isn't the best Off Roader, the Defender is. The Range Rover is EXTREMELY GOOD but (if you know how to drive it) the the Defender is the best. :)
@DefenderRocks Thanks for Your reply - of course You`re right, in rough terrain the Defender is unbeatable. But in the summary of average Middle European conditions, I would prefer the RR. Of course thats also a question of Your budget...Deeply impressed I have driven both and I`ll do it again at an off-road event next weekend. Anyways I am a big fan of Land-Rover since I was a little boy watching "Daktary".
Land Rovers, G Wagens and Land Cruisers are the best off -roaders built.. Not necessarily in that order.. Its a shame we cant get Defenders new in the USA any longer :(
I agree with unsafeSANDWICH, range rovers are the "ultimate off roading vehicle" for people that can afford it. But, I would not call jeep a cheap ass suv. Sure it doesnt have as many offroad features, or as refined interior as the range rover. But it does cost $45,000 less than the range rover, and it does look pretty nice for the 2011 re-design. Believe me I would kill to own a range rover any day, but, fact is us middle class people just cant!
@scorpio3lion i'm really not trying to be rude. but YES THOSE ARE " TRACKS" ( or roads ), and my is350 could speed down a dirt road and splash through puddles! And the snow video, is that a joke? i mean any car OR suv could drift around in a thin layer of snow, it doesnt take an offroad vehicle. And lastly, the "rocks", really??? more like little stones those X5's were going over. check out "Range Rover off-roading in moab, UT ! " those are rocks...
Best off roaders. Jeep Wrangler, Willy's ww2 Jeep, Land rover defender, Range rover, ( well any land rover, basically ) Jeep grand cherokee , Mercedes g500, Hummer H1 ( kindoff, only because of its size ), and Lamborghini lm002
Interesting to read the 'buy a Toyota' comments. I did. Bought a new '07 FJ Cruiser. Sold it & bought an '04 Land Rover Discovery SE. Land Rover makes a better truck. Period.
@marshalllucky ya buy toyota if you wanna fork out heaps of cash everytime it breaks down not too mention the fact they're horrible offroad compared too a landy
This is car is nice, but I would never take it offroad! Once you waste about 55 grand on a car, than I am pretty sure that you don't want to get any scratches or dents into the car from going offroading on huge rucks, twigs, and a bunch of trees. I don't want to sound like a fanboy but buying a cheap version of a Jeep Wrangler or something can do the trick in offroading and city driving, plus the repairs are cheaper and so are the maintenance. This is all that I have ti say. I am not a fanboy.
these days you are better with a hyundai santa fe or a kia sorento which are more than a match for the big wallowy rangrovers and much better value ;-)
not to mention the range rover doesnt have a snorkel and the LC/RR have low air boxes, it limits you to around 600mm wading max. sexy looking car and great for the city and a bit of offroad, but easily damaged in hardcore 4wding due to lack of protection and ride hight, and alot more expensive to repair.
my brother has a range rover and i have a nissan patrol ti with some serious offroad upgrades. i have a 6" lift, MYE suspension and ARB offroader pack, plus upgraded fuel tank, reinforcements and all the extras you could possible need. it cost me around 100,000 AU, whereas my brother paid 220,000AU for his rover. Mine goes much harder offroad than the range rover and although they are excellent and have the bells and whistles to go offroad, you're petrified of repair bills if you damage it.
The RR will go anywhere the Land Cruiser will go and more. But the LC will keep going there while the RR will sometimes break down along the way. In my experience it might not be a real breakdown, often it's just some spurious warnings or it goes to limp mode over something stupid. Which would I want as a companion 2 years down the line on a journey to the earth's nether regions? Toyota every time. dayhandler7 is right about the practicalities but even at the same price, the LC is more reliable.
go and check the fucking ground clearance of a range rover compared to a landcruiser and thats point 1 and i'm sure there are other things that sucks in RR or LR. i mean ground clearance is the first option for a vehicle when its about OFFROADING stupid. United Nations delivers the most offroading missions in the world and Land Cruiser is the vehicle of their choice cause they know a LC will never let them down. They bought 15000 of LCs last year only.
@jamshedkhan81 yeah cuz why would they buy 15k range rovers, they have no need for the super luxurious amenities the rr delivers. its just practical to buy lc because they are half the price. a rover is easily better.
@dayhandler7 read my post. while i enjoy driving the RR, my patrol dominates offroad. 35k of upgrades on a ti (luxury) patrol smashes the RR offroad, and not to mention i can fit bigger tyres on my patrol compared to the RR. In mud, sand, rock and hard rutty trails a patrol or LC is better, even without ground clearance. while range rover boasts all the nice perks inside and it IS good offroad, the raw capabilities of LC and patrol are better, sorry.
Last week I got the chance, to drive this car in this manner. I announced by myself, It is the best Offroader worldwide, because it offers a maximum of comfort and security in any terrain you can imagine. You allways feel like in your living-room. I hope, Land-Rover will not join the trend to pure street-vehicles, looking only like Offroaders!
i dont think u will drive this car on the mountain, with this price tag? and going to rocky mountain isnt nice going with car.. better be walking..nice car, but it didnt deserve to call it Sport Utility Vehicle, becoz driving very slow and crawling over the mountain isnt sport for me...
@xMellowDubx you get both with the RR.....don't know any other SUV that has that. And besides, when you buy one, with the offroad tyres installed, you go straight from a fancy restaurant to a muddy place with a simple switch of a button in the car.
alot of u guys are ignorant..range rovers are for people who can actually afford an actual offroading car. im sure its the best of its kind..and will out do any of ur cheap ass jeeps and 4x4s.
@ZeeMetallz mate a real offroading vehicle is a defender it has no luxuries at all, it is purely built for being off road, it has no on road capabilities at ALL! thats y its fckin awesome! not to mention its panels r stuck on with pop rivets! But if i could afford a range rover i would not at all hesitate to get 1.
@unsafeSANWICH first off i do like the RR for being somewhat offroad worthy while on the other hand being a high end luxury SUV. but to say that it would out do a Jeep wrangler is retarted! take a 2dr Rubicon against any any RR and the Rubi will win. Because of its 32" M/T tires, Front & Rear lockers, and D44 solid front and rear axles. IFS dont have enough flex for offroad.
@taekwondoblackbelt1 your jeep has less power, worse transmission, and your jeep is less luxurious also your jeep docent compare with this car you yabo
RR`s are not made for serious offroading, they are now just too heavy and have too many gadgets to go wrong.They are now designed for footballers wives to go to the mall.look how this car struggles on this video :-(
RR, the king! If You really want a high-classed, ultilative comfortable Cross-country car, it is your single choice again. The other luxury 4WDs develope more and more to street station wagons, like the brandnew VW Touareg for example. There´s almost nothing left anymore to cross- ability and the Range will be alone on the market as 40 years ago. Don`t become bigger and havier anymore, but do the opposite! Please look at the origin model of 1970 with size and weight of todays Freelander!
People can hate the Range Rover all they want.The Land Rover company is the grandfather of luxury suv's. Someone tried to compare the audi q7 and said it had more luxury? Look where they got the idea from? WHere was the q7 back in 1970 when the Range Rover was first produced?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
who said that RR is a luxury car? huh it's a cup of shit. as luxury as phantom lol... have u just ever seen phantom? offroad abilities? lol it's impossimble with RR's airsuspension.
if u want a good luxury SUV you should look at GL,G-klasse of Mercedes or BMW's X5,X6 or at least at Audi Q7. if u want good offroad car - again look at G-klasse or Land Rover Defender or UAZ Patriot or Nissan Patrol.
so what is RR? just ordinary car like VW passat or Mitsu Lancer... huh!
RR is a 100% luxury SUV that "no one knows how expensive your SUV is because youre not an arrogant dick that shows off in a BMW Audi or Mercedes," lets you and four other passengers ride around in absolute comfort, and also as an off roader when you really need it.
Don't forget, the MKIII RR was designed by BMW and had a lot of BMW parts to begin with back in 2003.
bmw and mercedes suv's are shithouse, cant offroad for crap.. there only good for how comfortable they are... audi q7 has a very tough engine but it cant compete with a range rover vogue... especially the X5 and X6 they cant offroad for crap
You're right dude, anyway you cant compare the range rover and the hummer, the range rover is a car designed to be the best luxury vehicle on earth, and it is, it's as comfortable as a phantom and it can deal with any terrain with ease. The hummer might be slightly better offroad but it'll never match the refinement obtained by the range rover, these cars aren't playing in the same category. For me it's definitely RR all the way, its an amazing car :D
thers no chance a hummer can get this best lukin range rover sport ,, r u kiding ,,,, we talkin abut range rovers here ,,,, hummer is a hammar lmaoooo thy r shit ,, cant beat range rover sport
Hummers are the shitties so called "suv" ever made... there just made to look cool especially the H3's and the H2's.... H1's are alright.... but none of them have anything on a rangerover or landrovers offroad ability
H1s can go up a vertical wall buddy, look it up... I'm not here to bitch or argue about which ones better, both of em are nice... I prefer the RR, but not everyone can afford one... Much less take one off road..
H1 can go up a vertical wall? no car can do that.. its physically impossible, even for a range rover.. ive seen what your referring too... but its not actually pulling its weight up a vertical wall, its just getting its front wheels up... needs good approach angles to do it which the hummer has... but its still not a great climbing car
@riz44 I hope your kidding about the H1 being 'alright' off road. H2s and H3s are just Ford explorers with makeup but the H1 is a technological masterpiece that cannot be bested. No Range Rover can do what a H1 can do. You know how they used to test H1s? They would crane them up and then drop them to the ground and then analyze the weakness in the chassis....something a RR would never go through during production testing.
@ellisfreedman Besides the h1 you obvously know nothing about hummers.Hummer is gm,not ford.The h3 is basied off the colorado,and the h2 uses parts of the HD suburban and the tahao.
I agree with you that H1's are insane. However, Rovers are nothing to laugh at. It is interesting that you mentioned drop tests on the H1. They actually designed the Bowler Wildcat, which is a modified Rover, to survive a 40 foot drop. Not sure if they tested it or not but it gives you an idea of just what goes into these things.
@riz44 actually no, true hummers (and I mean original hummers) smoke any Land/ Range Rovers offroading... Most people just can't drive them. And a lil piece of info... Land/ Range Rovers have really shitty wiring to begin with... Getting them wet really doesn't help.
I will agree, H3's are made for ppl who can't drive a hummer cuz they are too big but still wanna feel manly. Honda civics handle better in snow than an H3
@NewCoordinator Any properly spec'd 4x4 with decent articulation, good weight distribution, good tyres and a decent drivetrain is going to do well offroad - Pajero, Hilux, Hummer, Defender, Jimny - they're all *GOOD* offroaders and they'll all do well in the mud. The Hummer will climb better than any of the others because of its wheelbase, and the Jimny will crest better for the same reason.
You can't say that a Hummer "smokes" a Defender, they're both good for different reasons.
My 2010 Range Rover is amazing truly great suv's took it off road 2wice just 4 the fun of it but mostly highway runs. haters will always hate....... :- {
stand shit to all suv trucks in the world. could you guess why the military uses h1s. o yeah cause they would not use a rr piece of shit. it would get nowhere except stuck in a grass field
5) if the USA used Land Rover, they would use a Defender which is far better than any Hummer. That Range Rover not only can go off road, but also is extremely luxurious, and can do 140mph. Hummers top out at what? 80? Going downhill? Getting 8 mpg while the Land Rovers get over 20mpg?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yes yes yes !!!!! finally some 1 with sense! rnge rovers are so unrelieable whereas the landcruiser is fuckin bulletproof literally! the range rover is for business people that drive round london with a backberry phone in there hand thats all there good for... the landcruiser is amazing
I have to intervene there, i think you have a very good point, but a lot of people are still referring to Land Rover in the 80's back then they were very unreliable so were Jaguar, but now they have improved vastly and being a Range Rover for over 14 years now and had 2 Rangies i can assure you that i not once had a single problem with it and they are an extremely reliable care today!
I agree. The range rover is the flagship car and should dictate design.. The front end looks downgraded. Not commanding like before.. It looks like a Ford Explorer.. sad
I really don't like the changes they made to the front end. Now it just looks more like a larger RR Sport, rather than the other way around. This car should be the design leader because it's more expensive. Make those headlamps bigger like they were before!
I Agree with you all, the Range Rover is more spacious, more meaty, more buisness like, Land/Range Rover have the most strongest 4x4s in the world and you always hear about the Range rover. Stuff the Land Cruiser if you ask me!
I think its the way the light just shines on it, I have seen this car in the UK and its wheels have not been changed, the new design has a little square section that sits proud on the bottom of the spoke as it meets the rim, this looks like it catches the light here perhaps presenting the thought of damage, one for the style team to consider in future that! But a brief jet wash soon brings them back to life, the present MY09 4.2SC look a mess with mud on them, but soon revive with some cleaning
land cruiser 200 is buul sheet the old new jeep grand cherokee and the range rover are the best cars best 4wd sistems and this cars grand cherokee and range rover have more artciculation then the land cruiseer 200 and more style and a important thing air suspencion for offfroad and on road
I wouldn't dare ever say that a Land Cruiser can do more than a Range Rover. Land Rover's not only look better than Land Cruiser's but they are better off road, I would know I go wheeling all the time with Toyota's and guess who they have lead the trips, ME because they knwo my Range will get to the other side and be able to help them up if need be:)
The Range Rover is a fabulous car. The best, which is why the British Royal Family drive them.
The LandCruiser is a good car but too expensive in the UK, almost Range Rover money. But sells for about 25k in Japan. The UN buys loads of Landcruisers because Toyota gives them a good price. and are probably a touch more reliable.
But Id prefer a Range Rover to an Landcruiser anyday. More style, better to drive and better off road with an interior of a Rolls Royce! the Best off roader
and what more? Don't get me wrong, I admire Land Cruisers for what they are but the current Land Rover models are far more superior in every aspect than the Toyotas.
That's true, you can't compare Land Crusier Prado or FJ Crusier with the land rover's, but you can compare, the Land Crusier HZJ series with the Land Rover, and in that case, Land Crusier can win.
The HZJ series fight with the LR Defender, but not with the Range or the LR4, only with the Defender
Im NOT SURPRISED range rover can do this, I am however SURPRISED it didnt break down on its way to that offroad track
polzowatel 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rang Rover in Saudi Desert big Zero , may be it looks good but its sloppy , heats up fast the electronic failure is horrendous
sound2354 2 months ago
I own a 2004 L322 Range Rover Vogue 3.0 td6 and i would never change it with another luxury 4x4...you dont notice if you are on a highway or of you are in the middle of the mud (and believe me i went a lot of times in medium offroad tracks, not because of the car but because im a rookie in offroading and the car has never let me down)
LupiMCMLXXXIV 3 months ago
The school run sure is getting tougher, I must invest in one of these for my 2.4 children
cupmike 7 months ago
great for offroad and looks good for on the road ;D
brodabeat 7 months ago
Even if you're going through all this rough terrain, as a driver you're like in a oasis of comfort and luxury. I mean, what's more comfortable than being gently massaged while driving through a river?
n0hhh 8 months ago
Huh my Mitsubishi Galant car could do that run, show us some real of roading
Cattachmore22 9 months ago
@afghanmanyeah
"jeep died in 2001 as far as I'm concerned!!"
Too right. What have they done to the cherokee!?
brightlights456X 9 months ago
Для премиум внедорожника 5+
Goolchek 10 months ago
the range rovers ( acutal range rovers, not the ford ones) already come with 4 wheel differientials, standard.. range rovers are like the drill, and other offroaders are screwdirvers with perks
TheStruggle66 10 months ago
I used to drive a jeep grand cheroke and there was nothing wrong it them but about 2 years ago i got a Range rover sport and there is no comparison between the two the Range rover is a much better car the only other suv that mixes luxury with off roading is the Toyota land cruiser which i drove though a desert out side of Dubai although id have to say i would have rather had a Range Rover
theelectronicalman 10 months ago
this is the only proper suv in the world
silvershadow169 11 months ago
Range Rover - the king! It will never be beaten - forever...
forstflieger 11 months ago 10
@forstflieger The Range Rover actually isn't the best Off Roader, the Defender is. The Range Rover is EXTREMELY GOOD but (if you know how to drive it) the the Defender is the best. :)
DefenderRocks 6 months ago
@DefenderRocks Thanks for Your reply - of course You`re right, in rough terrain the Defender is unbeatable. But in the summary of average Middle European conditions, I would prefer the RR. Of course thats also a question of Your budget...Deeply impressed I have driven both and I`ll do it again at an off-road event next weekend. Anyways I am a big fan of Land-Rover since I was a little boy watching "Daktary".
forstflieger 6 months ago
@forstflieger The Range Rover is definitely more comfortable
DefenderRocks 6 months ago
Land Rovers, G Wagens and Land Cruisers are the best off -roaders built.. Not necessarily in that order.. Its a shame we cant get Defenders new in the USA any longer :(
twstrchasr 11 months ago
I agree with unsafeSANDWICH, range rovers are the "ultimate off roading vehicle" for people that can afford it. But, I would not call jeep a cheap ass suv. Sure it doesnt have as many offroad features, or as refined interior as the range rover. But it does cost $45,000 less than the range rover, and it does look pretty nice for the 2011 re-design. Believe me I would kill to own a range rover any day, but, fact is us middle class people just cant!
boatfreak009 1 year ago
@scorpio3lion i'm really not trying to be rude. but YES THOSE ARE " TRACKS" ( or roads ), and my is350 could speed down a dirt road and splash through puddles! And the snow video, is that a joke? i mean any car OR suv could drift around in a thin layer of snow, it doesnt take an offroad vehicle. And lastly, the "rocks", really??? more like little stones those X5's were going over. check out "Range Rover off-roading in moab, UT ! " those are rocks...
fdhuff2006 1 year ago
@scorpio3lion that is laughable. i would love for you to share a video of an x5 REALLY offroad. not a "offroad track"
fdhuff2006 1 year ago
the rin 19'' or 20'' of the range rover is not good condition off road ways -and this ways depen the highess tyres...
roveredsv 1 year ago
Best off roaders. Jeep Wrangler, Willy's ww2 Jeep, Land rover defender, Range rover, ( well any land rover, basically ) Jeep grand cherokee , Mercedes g500, Hummer H1 ( kindoff, only because of its size ), and Lamborghini lm002
OceanPotato 1 year ago
look at the video "who said range rovers are good 4x4 s"
auzie420 1 year ago
@auzie420 he had yhe wrong tyre`s is all!!
nate12345671 1 year ago
Interesting to read the 'buy a Toyota' comments. I did. Bought a new '07 FJ Cruiser. Sold it & bought an '04 Land Rover Discovery SE. Land Rover makes a better truck. Period.
07FJC 1 year ago
I don't like the new refreshed model as much. It looks too busy
nickitheninja5 1 year ago
Such a Noble car..
riky95oo 1 year ago
RR used to be good off road but these days they are strictly for the shopping mall ;-)
marshalllucky 1 year ago
i fucking love this suv
kandastrike 1 year ago
@kandastrike these are not good car, they are too heavy and they break down, a LOT
you should buy a toyota, remember the name TOYOTA ;-)
marshalllucky 1 year ago
@marshalllucky ya buy toyota if you wanna fork out heaps of cash everytime it breaks down not too mention the fact they're horrible offroad compared too a landy
NotARandomName 1 year ago
@NotARandomName and toyota's will accelerate for you as well. how convenient. but the reliability thing is true though.
AGVancouver 1 year ago
the range rover is the best suv in the world.he his a excellent off road car and a excellent road car is.
eddymicrocar95 1 year ago
This is car is nice, but I would never take it offroad! Once you waste about 55 grand on a car, than I am pretty sure that you don't want to get any scratches or dents into the car from going offroading on huge rucks, twigs, and a bunch of trees. I don't want to sound like a fanboy but buying a cheap version of a Jeep Wrangler or something can do the trick in offroading and city driving, plus the repairs are cheaper and so are the maintenance. This is all that I have ti say. I am not a fanboy.
TheGamerPlus 1 year ago
though i would not buy one to off road in i hate hollywood bitches who buy these to lug around shopping bags. Rich bitches.
JAYDIZZLE100 1 year ago
these days you are better with a hyundai santa fe or a kia sorento which are more than a match for the big wallowy rangrovers and much better value ;-)
marshalllucky 1 year ago 2
not to mention the range rover doesnt have a snorkel and the LC/RR have low air boxes, it limits you to around 600mm wading max. sexy looking car and great for the city and a bit of offroad, but easily damaged in hardcore 4wding due to lack of protection and ride hight, and alot more expensive to repair.
ItsMRMONEY 1 year ago
my brother has a range rover and i have a nissan patrol ti with some serious offroad upgrades. i have a 6" lift, MYE suspension and ARB offroader pack, plus upgraded fuel tank, reinforcements and all the extras you could possible need. it cost me around 100,000 AU, whereas my brother paid 220,000AU for his rover. Mine goes much harder offroad than the range rover and although they are excellent and have the bells and whistles to go offroad, you're petrified of repair bills if you damage it.
ItsMRMONEY 1 year ago
The RR will go anywhere the Land Cruiser will go and more. But the LC will keep going there while the RR will sometimes break down along the way. In my experience it might not be a real breakdown, often it's just some spurious warnings or it goes to limp mode over something stupid. Which would I want as a companion 2 years down the line on a journey to the earth's nether regions? Toyota every time. dayhandler7 is right about the practicalities but even at the same price, the LC is more reliable.
Too2Deep 1 year ago
go and check the fucking ground clearance of a range rover compared to a landcruiser and thats point 1 and i'm sure there are other things that sucks in RR or LR. i mean ground clearance is the first option for a vehicle when its about OFFROADING stupid. United Nations delivers the most offroading missions in the world and Land Cruiser is the vehicle of their choice cause they know a LC will never let them down. They bought 15000 of LCs last year only.
jamshedkhan81 1 year ago
@jamshedkhan81 yeah cuz why would they buy 15k range rovers, they have no need for the super luxurious amenities the rr delivers. its just practical to buy lc because they are half the price. a rover is easily better.
dayhandler7 1 year ago
@dayhandler7 read my post. while i enjoy driving the RR, my patrol dominates offroad. 35k of upgrades on a ti (luxury) patrol smashes the RR offroad, and not to mention i can fit bigger tyres on my patrol compared to the RR. In mud, sand, rock and hard rutty trails a patrol or LC is better, even without ground clearance. while range rover boasts all the nice perks inside and it IS good offroad, the raw capabilities of LC and patrol are better, sorry.
ItsMRMONEY 1 year ago
Last week I got the chance, to drive this car in this manner. I announced by myself, It is the best Offroader worldwide, because it offers a maximum of comfort and security in any terrain you can imagine. You allways feel like in your living-room. I hope, Land-Rover will not join the trend to pure street-vehicles, looking only like Offroaders!
forstflieger 1 year ago
i was hear in the land rover event in new jersy its mad scary a range can do eny thing i had my 2009 strut now i have a 2011 strut
bighitta13 1 year ago
i dont think u will drive this car on the mountain, with this price tag? and going to rocky mountain isnt nice going with car.. better be walking..nice car, but it didnt deserve to call it Sport Utility Vehicle, becoz driving very slow and crawling over the mountain isnt sport for me...
aenimoxxx 1 year ago
@aenimoxxx Haha.. You really don't know what you are talking about, do you?
The Range Rover isn't a SUV. It's a Range Rover.
And there aren't many people that can keep up with a 4x4 in the mountains.
A Porsche Cayenne, that's a fine SUV.
RadioPark 1 year ago
no comparison to a land cruiser no matter what any one can say.
faziljaved 1 year ago
id rather buy the svt raptor and have a way more badass truck
xMellowDubx 1 year ago
silly niggers trying to go off road LOL get a man truck
xMellowDubx 1 year ago
@xMellowDubx this suv is the best ever!!! dont diss it just because your too poor to afford one
jamie12126 1 year ago
@jamie12126 im sorry but i prefer function over fashion
xMellowDubx 1 year ago
@xMellowDubx you get both with the RR.....don't know any other SUV that has that. And besides, when you buy one, with the offroad tyres installed, you go straight from a fancy restaurant to a muddy place with a simple switch of a button in the car.
jamie12126 1 year ago
after that u have 2 bay 100000000 4 mintenance
mswak 1 year ago
alot of u guys are ignorant..range rovers are for people who can actually afford an actual offroading car. im sure its the best of its kind..and will out do any of ur cheap ass jeeps and 4x4s.
unsafeSANWICH 1 year ago 60
@unsafeSANWICH I agree but I think offroad the Defender beats it
SuperRudy94 1 year ago
@unsafeSANWICH i have 2008 HSE sport and this machine is a monster ....monster
PKTN88 1 year ago
@unsafeSANWICH hate to be a snob.
adam3916grant 1 year ago
@unsafeSANWICH Wow a real offroading vehicle? A Real offroading vehicle is a landcruiser hands down.
ZeeMetallz 11 months ago
@ZeeMetallz mate a real offroading vehicle is a defender it has no luxuries at all, it is purely built for being off road, it has no on road capabilities at ALL! thats y its fckin awesome! not to mention its panels r stuck on with pop rivets! But if i could afford a range rover i would not at all hesitate to get 1.
legend563 11 months ago 2
@legend563 Have to disagree i'd have an old fj40 or 80 series landy before one of these European things.
ZeeMetallz 11 months ago
@unsafeSANWICH well you know what normal people wouldent et an 80,000 truck just for offroading MORON!
redneck4runneroutlaw 8 months ago
@unsafeSANWICH first off i do like the RR for being somewhat offroad worthy while on the other hand being a high end luxury SUV. but to say that it would out do a Jeep wrangler is retarted! take a 2dr Rubicon against any any RR and the Rubi will win. Because of its 32" M/T tires, Front & Rear lockers, and D44 solid front and rear axles. IFS dont have enough flex for offroad.
kddcc 7 months ago
my jeep would kick your 4x4`s ass and this rover
taekwondoblackbelt1 5 months ago
@taekwondoblackbelt1
haha..i bet you're an american..haha...u american pussy
hafiezali 4 months ago
@taekwondoblackbelt1 your jeep has less power, worse transmission, and your jeep is less luxurious also your jeep docent compare with this car you yabo
junnman1 2 months ago
@unsafeSANWICH my jeep went through war..multiple times
SK8FILM09 2 months ago
RR`s are not made for serious offroading, they are now just too heavy and have too many gadgets to go wrong.They are now designed for footballers wives to go to the mall.look how this car struggles on this video :-(
marshalllucky 1 year ago
i think 2010 Grand Cherokee is the best !!
MrZozoee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Land Rover flagship showroom in Bangkok, near the US embassy opened recently. Go Landy - Go. GO BEYOND!
Dr John
CarSanook
carsanookdotcom 1 year ago
Jeep Wrangler
Jepp commander
Range rover/ Land rover 4 / Land rover defender
Mercedes "G" wagon
Nissan Xterra
That other nissan 4x4
hummers.
.... List of offroad cars from best to worst.
OceanPotato 1 year ago
Lame. Not worth 98 grand
ZigzagHag 1 year ago
Stunning!
lordsnooty01 1 year ago
Stunning!
lordsnooty01 1 year ago
Love these specially prepared and contrived off road courses.
In reality these cars would get stuck in the nearest ditch.
BillDFC 1 year ago
even a VW can do that get a Hummer H1 this RR is luxury not 4 x 4 even a panda is better
OrryBoy 1 year ago
The drivetrain is perminant awd....
And watch the fifth gear vid with the range rover and panda 4x4.
The range kicks it ass.
MrBeastandtheharlot 1 year ago
@MrBeastandtheharlot
Boruc987 1 year ago
@MrBeastandtheharlot actually its perminant 4wd,or at least they are now,the difference is that you have the ablity to lock the center differencial.
rangerover06sc 1 year ago
RR, the king! If You really want a high-classed, ultilative comfortable Cross-country car, it is your single choice again. The other luxury 4WDs develope more and more to street station wagons, like the brandnew VW Touareg for example. There´s almost nothing left anymore to cross- ability and the Range will be alone on the market as 40 years ago. Don`t become bigger and havier anymore, but do the opposite! Please look at the origin model of 1970 with size and weight of todays Freelander!
forstflieger 1 year ago
pure class
lrdisco4x4 2 years ago 3
131 euro with no extras in portugal... what abough in your countries?
pipinho114 2 years ago
In Mexico It Cost $124,000 dollars And $107,000
memepowers 2 years ago
the same in greece...130000 basic price...and i athens you cannot buy the diesel but only the stupid supercharged...
keftes1989 1 year ago
People can hate the Range Rover all they want.The Land Rover company is the grandfather of luxury suv's. Someone tried to compare the audi q7 and said it had more luxury? Look where they got the idea from? WHere was the q7 back in 1970 when the Range Rover was first produced?
datkoolbrutha 2 years ago
@datkoolbrutha G-Wagon
ellisfreedman 1 year ago
looks like land rover test track, in real off road those panels would be dinged and cost a fortune to fix.
sexybritgent 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who said that RR is a luxury car? huh it's a cup of shit. as luxury as phantom lol... have u just ever seen phantom? offroad abilities? lol it's impossimble with RR's airsuspension.
if u want a good luxury SUV you should look at GL,G-klasse of Mercedes or BMW's X5,X6 or at least at Audi Q7. if u want good offroad car - again look at G-klasse or Land Rover Defender or UAZ Patriot or Nissan Patrol.
so what is RR? just ordinary car like VW passat or Mitsu Lancer... huh!
zaaaooozzzaa 2 years ago
@zaaaooozzzaa
RR is a 100% luxury SUV that "no one knows how expensive your SUV is because youre not an arrogant dick that shows off in a BMW Audi or Mercedes," lets you and four other passengers ride around in absolute comfort, and also as an off roader when you really need it.
Don't forget, the MKIII RR was designed by BMW and had a lot of BMW parts to begin with back in 2003.
defcon888 2 years ago
bmw and mercedes suv's are shithouse, cant offroad for crap.. there only good for how comfortable they are... audi q7 has a very tough engine but it cant compete with a range rover vogue... especially the X5 and X6 they cant offroad for crap
riz44 2 years ago
I hate to agree with you but yes, BMW,AUDi and Meredes are overcharging compared to RR
Firminator128 1 year ago
which one is better, Range Rover 2010 or Ford Escape 2010? I can't decide which one to buy for winter driving...
gugulimagooli 2 years ago
your kidding,right?
rangerover06sc 2 years ago
stupid question. RR of course
Firminator128 1 year ago
i woudnt take it offroad.
alexkostenyuk 2 years ago
hummer is a piece oj shit, i have RR and i swear, that i wont buy any car execpt RR
nariukas 2 years ago 2
You're right dude, anyway you cant compare the range rover and the hummer, the range rover is a car designed to be the best luxury vehicle on earth, and it is, it's as comfortable as a phantom and it can deal with any terrain with ease. The hummer might be slightly better offroad but it'll never match the refinement obtained by the range rover, these cars aren't playing in the same category. For me it's definitely RR all the way, its an amazing car :D
Paddiwak87 2 years ago
mcgiggins
thers no chance a hummer can get this best lukin range rover sport ,, r u kiding ,,,, we talkin abut range rovers here ,,,, hummer is a hammar lmaoooo thy r shit ,, cant beat range rover sport
4R4B4LYF 2 years ago
Yeah but a Hummer would pull this shit apart
mcgiggins 2 years ago
Hummers are the shitties so called "suv" ever made... there just made to look cool especially the H3's and the H2's.... H1's are alright.... but none of them have anything on a rangerover or landrovers offroad ability
riz44 2 years ago 31
H1s can go up a vertical wall buddy, look it up... I'm not here to bitch or argue about which ones better, both of em are nice... I prefer the RR, but not everyone can afford one... Much less take one off road..
Kairingo 2 years ago
H1 can go up a vertical wall? no car can do that.. its physically impossible, even for a range rover.. ive seen what your referring too... but its not actually pulling its weight up a vertical wall, its just getting its front wheels up... needs good approach angles to do it which the hummer has... but its still not a great climbing car
riz44 2 years ago
yeah, not fully.. you've seen the video most likely, I was real tired when I wrote that my bad :)
Kairingo 2 years ago
You cant compare H1 to Range Rover. H1 is a military vehicle, while Range Rover is a LUXURY SUV.
derbigpr500 2 years ago
@riz44 I hope your kidding about the H1 being 'alright' off road. H2s and H3s are just Ford explorers with makeup but the H1 is a technological masterpiece that cannot be bested. No Range Rover can do what a H1 can do. You know how they used to test H1s? They would crane them up and then drop them to the ground and then analyze the weakness in the chassis....something a RR would never go through during production testing.
ellisfreedman 1 year ago
@ellisfreedman Besides the h1 you obvously know nothing about hummers.Hummer is gm,not ford.The h3 is basied off the colorado,and the h2 uses parts of the HD suburban and the tahao.
rangerover06sc 1 year ago
@rangerover06sc Then I guess I'm an idiot. Not that I want to waste my time acquiring knowledge about stupid vehicles like H2s and H3s.
ellisfreedman 1 year ago
@ellisfreedman
I agree with you that H1's are insane. However, Rovers are nothing to laugh at. It is interesting that you mentioned drop tests on the H1. They actually designed the Bowler Wildcat, which is a modified Rover, to survive a 40 foot drop. Not sure if they tested it or not but it gives you an idea of just what goes into these things.
CorvetteRacingFan 1 year ago
@riz44 actually no, true hummers (and I mean original hummers) smoke any Land/ Range Rovers offroading... Most people just can't drive them. And a lil piece of info... Land/ Range Rovers have really shitty wiring to begin with... Getting them wet really doesn't help.
I will agree, H3's are made for ppl who can't drive a hummer cuz they are too big but still wanna feel manly. Honda civics handle better in snow than an H3
NewCoordinator 8 months ago
@NewCoordinator Any properly spec'd 4x4 with decent articulation, good weight distribution, good tyres and a decent drivetrain is going to do well offroad - Pajero, Hilux, Hummer, Defender, Jimny - they're all *GOOD* offroaders and they'll all do well in the mud. The Hummer will climb better than any of the others because of its wheelbase, and the Jimny will crest better for the same reason.
You can't say that a Hummer "smokes" a Defender, they're both good for different reasons.
MudBarf 8 months ago
is it just me or does that car just sound a little bit to quit?
eivindandreashiew 2 years ago
lol at 1:02 poor car
originofmight 2 years ago
Ah 'tis but a flesh wound! Wait till you see one getting 6 feet of air over a dune...
2pintsplease 2 years ago
true
Bosnian808 2 years ago
My 2010 Range Rover is amazing truly great suv's took it off road 2wice just 4 the fun of it but mostly highway runs. haters will always hate....... :- {
cheatedeath86 2 years ago
You don't have one, howevefr every one claims they do.
Bosnian808 2 years ago 2
Sure you have one
Bosnian808 2 years ago
I love rangies.
Bosnian808 2 years ago
nice suv but it probably should just stay on the road. no good offroad. this trail is nothing
soddyshnarf 2 years ago
The front looks way too much like a Range Rover Sport! Why would they do that?
mikestein5000 2 years ago
like tham, like that it is all squred and they still doing tham like that. to spendy
MrNuga88 2 years ago
I'm on my 2nd rangie and love them, no more niggles than with any other vehicle - if you dont service them - then what would you expect?
Mine is used on the farm, to work on the highway, recreational 4wd'ing and towing almost daily.
I've have another one in heart beat.
Wouldn't touch Jap stuff.
saulman1010 2 years ago
why you did not write 2020 year generation???/ I see old 2001 year
exceilence 2 years ago
i just bought a new x5 but my wife wants me to replace it for this, so i will.
PoveyLod 2 years ago
Where's the chirping bird?
phidelt08 2 years ago 3
Check this out :
Sabahan Ranau Kaamatan 4x4 Challenge 2009 By; K'NetH De CrockeR
mk6677 2 years ago
The only time these things go "off road" is when they mount the pavement outside the skool gates dropping little Sophie off!!
standandyliver07 2 years ago
You're an idiot, people take them off the road all of the time.
derse1031 2 years ago
Best car in the World!
n1ckotene 2 years ago 3
well I seen movies that vs other trucks like land crusier, hummer, escalade ande jeep but RR STAND SUPERIOR TO ALL SUV Trucks in the world
MrMercyboy 2 years ago 5
stand shit to all suv trucks in the world. could you guess why the military uses h1s. o yeah cause they would not use a rr piece of shit. it would get nowhere except stuck in a grass field
soddyshnarf 2 years ago
RR is amazng.
Bosnian808 2 years ago
Yeah... that's the reason why.
Couldn't possibly be:
1) RR are very expensive
2) The don't hold as much cargo
3) it's a luxury vehicle
4) it's British
5) if the USA used Land Rover, they would use a Defender which is far better than any Hummer. That Range Rover not only can go off road, but also is extremely luxurious, and can do 140mph. Hummers top out at what? 80? Going downhill? Getting 8 mpg while the Land Rovers get over 20mpg?
I have two Land Rovers and I love them.
94gtvert 2 years ago 2
neaver heard so much bullshit.
base spec rr=$80,000 and hummer= well, alot less.
If any goverment is going use a rugged 4x4 to ferry troops and equipment around its going to something simple like a hummer or a defender.
MrBeastandtheharlot 2 years ago
actually when you could still buy the h1 new they costed close to 200 grand
rangerover06sc 2 years ago
hell yeah. or a g wagon. yeah these are fancy but would get destroyed if it was used for rugged military use
soddyshnarf 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the best suv is the land cruser
cblock5555 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yes yes yes !!!!! finally some 1 with sense! rnge rovers are so unrelieable whereas the landcruiser is fuckin bulletproof literally! the range rover is for business people that drive round london with a backberry phone in there hand thats all there good for... the landcruiser is amazing
dec8ry19con7 2 years ago
Fucking idiot. Range Rovers can out wheel a Land Cruiser any day of the week.
love2skiutah 2 years ago 19
yeah bull shit. good luck with that
soddyshnarf 2 years ago
you can have a bulletproof range rover well cool!
dddddddgggggggggg 2 years ago
i agree about the sucky reliability but range rovers are superior cars and i would choose to lease one over a landcruiser anyday...
Ishkabibl7 2 years ago
I have to intervene there, i think you have a very good point, but a lot of people are still referring to Land Rover in the 80's back then they were very unreliable so were Jaguar, but now they have improved vastly and being a Range Rover for over 14 years now and had 2 Rangies i can assure you that i not once had a single problem with it and they are an extremely reliable care today!
nickobellic123 2 years ago
100% agree with u=]
MrBeastandtheharlot 2 years ago
Have u read autocars revieiw on the 2010 land cruiser?
I highly reconmend you do, ul be suprised.
MrBeastandtheharlot 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
come on any fucking suv can do that, i could do that with my stock 1991 Jeep YJ
tinicnic 2 years ago
your jeep would fall apart. within seconds. dont ever compare a rr with a fucking jeep.
nemoisthename67 2 years ago 18
Make money at scopaysystem point com!!! :) Buy this car!
MrBruceWain 2 years ago
I agree. The range rover is the flagship car and should dictate design.. The front end looks downgraded. Not commanding like before.. It looks like a Ford Explorer.. sad
Mackenzie1485 2 years ago
I dont see you at a desk designing cars?
MrBeastandtheharlot 2 years ago
I really don't like the changes they made to the front end. Now it just looks more like a larger RR Sport, rather than the other way around. This car should be the design leader because it's more expensive. Make those headlamps bigger like they were before!
coreydl2008 2 years ago
great vid
blueoval707 2 years ago
dont like the new headlamps.. they look kinda sissy
oldirtybastard213 2 years ago
I Agree with you all, the Range Rover is more spacious, more meaty, more buisness like, Land/Range Rover have the most strongest 4x4s in the world and you always hear about the Range rover. Stuff the Land Cruiser if you ask me!
tillourobbie 2 years ago 4
cool video :)
alexdouse2 2 years ago 2
I like how at 1:16 you notice that the wheels are completely thrashed. Don't try this with the stockers. Same goes for the RR Sport
sizquik 2 years ago
I think its the way the light just shines on it, I have seen this car in the UK and its wheels have not been changed, the new design has a little square section that sits proud on the bottom of the spoke as it meets the rim, this looks like it catches the light here perhaps presenting the thought of damage, one for the style team to consider in future that! But a brief jet wash soon brings them back to life, the present MY09 4.2SC look a mess with mud on them, but soon revive with some cleaning
BlesamaSoul 2 years ago
land cruiser 200 is buul sheet the old new jeep grand cherokee and the range rover are the best cars best 4wd sistems and this cars grand cherokee and range rover have more artciculation then the land cruiseer 200 and more style and a important thing air suspencion for offfroad and on road
nclg8 2 years ago
the land cruiser does have air suspension,and more articulation then a range rover!!
rangerover06sc 2 years ago
I wouldn't dare ever say that a Land Cruiser can do more than a Range Rover. Land Rover's not only look better than Land Cruiser's but they are better off road, I would know I go wheeling all the time with Toyota's and guess who they have lead the trips, ME because they knwo my Range will get to the other side and be able to help them up if need be:)
That new Range Rover is awesome!
LROFFROADdotCOM 2 years ago 2
The Range Rover is a fabulous car. The best, which is why the British Royal Family drive them.
The LandCruiser is a good car but too expensive in the UK, almost Range Rover money. But sells for about 25k in Japan. The UN buys loads of Landcruisers because Toyota gives them a good price. and are probably a touch more reliable.
But Id prefer a Range Rover to an Landcruiser anyday. More style, better to drive and better off road with an interior of a Rolls Royce! the Best off roader
NSKOlover 2 years ago 2
All hail the King!!!
hkyktms 2 years ago 2
Very, very nice!!!
Could someone imagine 40 years ago into what the "new" Land Rover will transform?
The Range Rover is just amazing!!!!
LRTICO 2 years ago
Land Crusier can do that and more...
mduran17 2 years ago
and what more? Don't get me wrong, I admire Land Cruisers for what they are but the current Land Rover models are far more superior in every aspect than the Toyotas.
LordWesamuni 2 years ago 2
That's true, you can't compare Land Crusier Prado or FJ Crusier with the land rover's, but you can compare, the Land Crusier HZJ series with the Land Rover, and in that case, Land Crusier can win.
The HZJ series fight with the LR Defender, but not with the Range or the LR4, only with the Defender
mduran17 2 years ago
find me a NON-BIASED review comparing both of them.
MrBeastandtheharlot 2 years ago