my teacher told us that your are not supposed to subtract or divide when solving these, but you can multiply by fractions. Why can we not divide and why did you divide by five?
@TheExtinctSpecie well but you can multiply them. So if you multiply a matrix with a fraction then you have divided it. There's nothing wrong with that.What you cannot divide is a matrix with a matrix (sorry my math english is not very good,I hope you understood)
The Gauss-Elimination is certainly a captivating and definately an effective of means of matrix calculations, once you get the dynamic of it down it really is a cool tool to have.
@metalman134 gauss elimination is actually simpler. The only difference is you only have to make zeros on the lower left part. In the end though, youve to do a back substitution since you can only obtain x3 directly from the matrix. Does that help?
@patrickJMT s it just a case of manipulating the rows by adding and subtracting the rows from each other to try and get the identity matrix? or is there a set method to how to get to the identity method. I guess what im really asking is it just a case of trial and improvement or is there a logical method to doing this?
Patrick....you're really awesome. I was stuck on a problem for the longest time after doing calculus for two years and I totally forgot that you could switch rows. That literally saved my life when it came to solving the problem. Thank you very much!
How come you didn't just solve the equation using Gaussian elimination? When you got it in upper triangular form you immediately know that z = 3, and can deduce the rest of the variables using back substitution.
Thank you for a great video. They still take me a long time to do though, although I assume that's normal because in the past paper we got there was a GJ question worth 12 marks when everything else was worth at most 4.
god bless you for this work you do. you bring peace of mind and confidence to so many. you shall be rewarded for it i know it. right this moment i am cramming for a test and maybe i won't fail my college algebra. my prof was taught by a nobel prize winner for his doctorate in math and he drives me crazy. they should give people like you the prize you are better. keep making vids!!!
thnx for these simple yet very helpful tutorial...
295laanne 1 week ago
I'm live in Austin, too! I might just drop by ACC to for tutoring in the flesh! ;D your videos are splendid
theredgear12 1 week ago
@theredgear12 good luck with acc, i have not been there for years now :) only a brief stop at that place for me!
patrickJMT 1 week ago
@patrickJMT I actually go to UT :) but thanks anyway! so you do YouTube math videos for a living now...?
theredgear12 1 week ago
@patrickJMT and please excuse my dear aunt sally, jk, my grammar -_-
theredgear12 1 week ago
thank you!
you got nice hand btw :))))
TheIcrumble 3 weeks ago 3
can I use this gauss jordan system with other matrix than 3x3 dimensions but still square?
trez32 3 weeks ago
@patrickJMT so this is LU decomposition?
persiantube1990 1 month ago
ughh this subject is legitimetly more difficult than calc 2, much more tedious imo
tRGodzApostle 1 month ago
@tRGodzApostle
No doubt man. I just finished calc 2, and it was ten times easier than this horse shit
McChickenn 3 weeks ago
SALAMAT
ilovecandy161 1 month ago
wow that's just kinda simple, thanks. i dont know why in books they use all these complicated annotations that confuse the heck out of you!
cantcount0 1 month ago
Thanks for making my 2 grueling weeks of matrices easier =)
Republic1ders 2 months ago
I see I'm not the only one who messes up with the clip of a sharpie! Haha!
MicNarcolepsy 2 months ago
my teacher told us that your are not supposed to subtract or divide when solving these, but you can multiply by fractions. Why can we not divide and why did you divide by five?
macoglesby 2 months ago
@macoglesby dunno, you would have to ask your teacher. you can 100% divide a row by any non zero number, no problem.
patrickJMT 2 months ago
@macoglesby it could be the desire to avoid fractions, which kill many people
patrickJMT 2 months ago
@patrickJMT I think he is thinking you shouldn't divide matrices.
TheExtinctSpecie 2 months ago
@TheExtinctSpecie well, but you can subtract matrices, so i am not sure what he means.
patrickJMT 2 months ago
@TheExtinctSpecie well but you can multiply them. So if you multiply a matrix with a fraction then you have divided it. There's nothing wrong with that.What you cannot divide is a matrix with a matrix (sorry my math english is not very good,I hope you understood)
girlfromipanema972 2 weeks ago
@macoglesby well, since x/5 = x * 1/5, it should be ok.
weoyondo 1 month ago
wow.. i learn almost nothing in my class this 7 min vid.taught me so much :) woooooooooooow these r actuallly interesting haha :D
ComputerNerd666 3 months ago
The Gauss-Elimination is certainly a captivating and definately an effective of means of matrix calculations, once you get the dynamic of it down it really is a cool tool to have.
VIR092 3 months ago
Your Vids are WAY better than Khan's .. no offence .. but YOU ARE AWESOME
mnthol 3 months ago 2
@mnthol that does not offend me : )
patrickJMT 3 months ago
@patrickJMT No offence to the guy at Khan .. he saves my ass too :D ..
mnthol 3 months ago
@mnthol he gets $2,000,000 grants so he is doing something right : )
patrickJMT 3 months ago
thanx sooo much... this helped a bunch.. i have a midterm tomorow n our math teacher dint taught us s***
rabia0011 3 months ago
i wish mine looked this neat:/ haa
EdithGuOropeza 3 months ago
These are easy, its just that its a lot of little steps and one wrong step means that everything is wrong
yinyengz515 3 months ago 7
@yinyengz515 wow didnt ask..
swisscheeseMAFIA 3 months ago
so what is the difference between row reduction method / gaussian elimination / gaussjordan elimination ???!!!!
dtm876 3 months ago 2
i hate having to choose rows to change. i always get these wrong! :P
bman54950 4 months ago
@bman54950 they do take some practice to get the hang of
patrickJMT 4 months ago
I didnt have sound and still found this better than my maths teacher!!
2020nigz 4 months ago 3
I always just don't know what to do to eliminate the y again during the second equation.
nocome2 4 months ago
I really like your videos patrick :D
JLchevz 4 months ago
@JLchevz thanks : )
patrickJMT 4 months ago
@patrickJMT aaawwwkwaaard.....
chrismerk420 3 months ago
huh a lot fo math proffs are left handed.. weird..
FattieAcidProduction 4 months ago
i thought dividing was illegal when dealing with matrices
brxscooby 4 months ago
@brxscooby thats wat thru me off
mibbzx1493 4 months ago
@mibbzx1493 it looked like it worked though
brxscooby 4 months ago
@brxscooby you can not divide two matrices, but you can divide elements inside of a matrix.
patrickJMT 4 months ago
THX for the help
hunterxhunter007kane 5 months ago
wow it helped thanks :)
nidabilli 5 months ago
can you make a vid on solving system equations using gaussian elimination? thankyou :)
metalman134 5 months ago
@metalman134 is that not what this is? isnt it the same thing
patrickJMT 5 months ago
@patrickJMT no, those are two separate things..
metalman134 5 months ago
@metalman134 gauss elimination is actually simpler. The only difference is you only have to make zeros on the lower left part. In the end though, youve to do a back substitution since you can only obtain x3 directly from the matrix. Does that help?
tonywoy 4 months ago
@metalman134 gaussian elimination is simpler, only you only have to have zeros below the diagonal (not below and above like in gauss jordan)
JLchevz 4 months ago
Is this actually faster than solving it the old way? like making x,y,z disappear...
vd853 5 months ago
@vd853 for large systems of equations, this is the method to use. easier to teach with 3 equations of course
patrickJMT 5 months ago
why did you enterchange the Y and Z? pls repost ASAP..... because when I was not reinterchange I got fractions..... why? tnx a lot in advance
MegaBangiz 5 months ago
how is this easier than substitution or the elimination method? I hate using a matrix! :(
lollerskates101LOL 7 months ago
Ahh too fast for me.
Tinzert 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@patrickJMT s it just a case of manipulating the rows by adding and subtracting the rows from each other to try and get the identity matrix? or is there a set method to how to get to the identity method. I guess what im really asking is it just a case of trial and improvement or is there a logical method to doing this?
ABCMathematics 7 months ago
Comment removed
ABCMathematics 8 months ago
emm, is there any advantage of using the gauss jordan method instead of just using the conventional method ie. eliminating some terms?
froet213kil 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FYI, this method was first appeared on a Chinese math textbook 150BC, and they name it after an European who wasn't born until 1700 years later.
021311 9 months ago
Comment removed
021311 9 months ago
I struggled two hours on a question, and solve it in 10 minutes after watching this video.
021311 9 months ago
Patrick....you're really awesome. I was stuck on a problem for the longest time after doing calculus for two years and I totally forgot that you could switch rows. That literally saved my life when it came to solving the problem. Thank you very much!
DaDumFriek 10 months ago
How come you didn't just solve the equation using Gaussian elimination? When you got it in upper triangular form you immediately know that z = 3, and can deduce the rest of the variables using back substitution.
Canouver 10 months ago
You sir just save my life and I thank thee!
redpatito 10 months ago
Thanks Patrick!!!
Just letting you know, My name is patrick, I like maths AND i'm left handed too.
We have so much in common!
philbot01 11 months ago
@philbot01 ha, my long lost twin
patrickJMT 11 months ago 17
@patrickJMT im left handed and i hate math :D
blackfuse27 10 months ago
@philbot01 ive had four math teachers in my life and all of them are left handed
6cheesy6 10 months ago
Patrick, im a lil confused abt how u noe which row to update afta doin an operation.
like-> -3*R2 + R1 = R1.... how do u know its supposed to be R1? and not R2?
pls reply soon!
23youwatch 11 months ago
@23youwatch whatever is on the right side of the equal sign is what gets updated
patrickJMT 11 months ago
do I have to get identity matrix ? or reduced row echelon form is enough? it makes me confused.
ruslangelaev 11 months ago
So I want to make sure, are there multiple correct ways of arriving at the same answer?
paydog23 1 year ago
@paydog23 yep
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT thanks man
paydog23 1 year ago
Wow. This is going to take awhile to get good at. Thanks for the video Patrick.
justdnk777 1 year ago
@justdnk777 it is tedious!!!! and you are welcome.
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Thank you for a great video. They still take me a long time to do though, although I assume that's normal because in the past paper we got there was a GJ question worth 12 marks when everything else was worth at most 4.
birdsofafeather1990 1 year ago
god bless you for this work you do. you bring peace of mind and confidence to so many. you shall be rewarded for it i know it. right this moment i am cramming for a test and maybe i won't fail my college algebra. my prof was taught by a nobel prize winner for his doctorate in math and he drives me crazy. they should give people like you the prize you are better. keep making vids!!!
xcompa77x 1 year ago
Too Good You Are
But show your face i wanna see you:-)
OxMATHEMATICS 1 year ago
@OxMATHEMATICS profile page is me!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
you are my idol.
tiongbo 1 year ago
Thank you!
lilmaqi 1 year ago
@lilmaqi no problem!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Thank you Patrick :)
Waranle 1 year ago
@Waranle you are very welcome waranle. hope all is well for you!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT everything is ok, thank you
Waranle 1 year ago
Isn't it easier and fast to get the matrix into upper echelon form? Then use back substitution to solve?
schlynn 1 year ago
@schlynn well, lots of ways to do lots of things. i think it would probably take me about the same amount of time either way.
patrickJMT 1 year ago