people that have the i5 2500k are just trying to make good points about it to convince themselfes that its worth haveing because they could not afford an i7 come on people i7 2600k is much better oh i7 is only a tiny bit faster lol its alot better if you ask me theres a rank structure so get an i7 and be on top of it
I've got an i5 2500K and yes the i7 2600K is a better CPU, but it's 40% more expensive, and for the vast majority of stuff you do is nowhere near 40% better. Even for stuff that does take advantage of hyper threading you're not going to get anywhere near a 40% increase in performance.
It all boils down to your budget. If you want value for money then get the 2500K, if money isn't an issue get the 2600K, or if you're really nuts go for LGA 2011.
@smallpebble7 Right, an i72600k doesn't make much of a difference on gaming compared to i5 2500k, unless you are editing video and such it does, but otherwise it is't worth 100$ more just to get some 10% or 5% performance.
muscle, sports? Computers don't work that way... weird comparisson. You got fast and faster. Its up to the software if it will actualy make a difference.
It depends. i5 are better at running gaming or other high CPU concentration while i7 are more useful at running multitasking or having alot of windows running at one time
@EliteGhost001 i7 is just a teensy wit better than i5 but that's saying a lot, i mean if you are only using it for gaming then the best option is an i5 2500k
@HighxTech i know but if the bulldozer will be so good like they say Hm then Bulldozer is better but 8 cores nobody need for gaming 8 cores even the 6 cores from the x6 are enough and not totally used.But if games now minimum need 3 cores like black ops i want a CPU who has enough cores for the next years but 8 are still tooo much for gaming.Its more for working i think
bought an i7 860 , went into bios and there was this magical option : Run CPU @ i7 870 settings? Me: hell yes .. so there ya go a cpu of ~280 bucks running the same settings as the one that costs ~500
A MMORPG game called Final Fantasy XIV utilizes hyperthreading and multiple cores and is pretty much fine tuned for the I7 processors. Would i see i big leap in performance using an Intel I7 930 processor over an I5 750 processor?
gonna run 1156 socket, whit a GTX 460 Cyclone or a ATi 5850, only use my computer for gaming and dont really have many programs open at the same time maybe use Photoshop sometimes ;)
@SyntoxStudios IMO, most of the power comes out of GPU so buy yourself a nice GPU (460 and 5850 are both very good, i choose 5850(not a fanboy)) and a AMD CPU, quad core would be nice, and that is all you need for gaming, I bought AMD + ATi and I'm very happy with the rig...
If you are building a game pc you shouldnt buy an i7, i5 and i7 are equal in gaming performance. The difference is the HyperThreading which you dont really need in gaming becouse games dont support that much threats. Sometimes i5 is even better.
So yes, the difference is very small, I personally needed 2 weeks to decide between those 2, and then I went for the i7, the only problem is that you can't run it well with the stock cooler, so I use it with corsair h50 liquid cooler...
@coccoborg I choosed the i5, because it was in my price range. :)
And i'm happy for that, cuz i don't have more than 1 or programs opened at the same time, and mostly i'm using my computer to gaming and doing homeworks. And if u buy an i5, u have more money to get a much better graphics card. For examle a HD5870 Vapor-X, If i choosed i7 860, then I've had take the 5850 to keep it in my budget.
yeah i got a i7. i got a i7 920 with 2.67 ghz i didnt choose it came with the comp plus i have 9gigs of ram 1tb of hard drive space and a Nvidia gtx 260 so is my computer good or am i gonna have to upgrade really soon im used to having a shitty computer and having bad experiances with alienware i always feel like somehting is gonna go wrong so idk main reason is i have gta 4 on the pc and my other games run fine and overall gta runs fun but i always get these flickering textures.
@gondule this is a reply to my last message: from something far away but when i get close it stops. it also sometimes happens to me when im up close on ither billboards and mostally decals like graffiti or blood i just wanna knwo what im doing wrong cause idk if im supposed to download some stuff on my comp to acces its full potential all i did was open it up and install oblivion be nie to hear your point of view since you know so much about PC's.
i5 all the way.... i7 is just for those over enthusiastic ppl. performance wise i5 should be way more than enof, regradless of what u do, make sure in i5, u buy i5-750
@vgvgvg7412 I have an I5 with a MUX 120 black, temps range from 30-40 un clocked and 40-50 to 3.20 ghz with that heatsink. I recommend it for a $70 au price is good money.
i have an i5-750 with MSI H55M-E33 mobo along with ATI HD5770 video card. Its currently running at the normal stock speed but its already performing very nicely. I just bought a Coolermaster Hyper 212 and im overclocking it very soon :D
I have a £600 i5 setup. i7's seem more suited to a £1000 setup with more then 4 GB RAM and a graphics card better than a Radeon 4870.
Even then, 3.8 GHz is just from following an easy to do overclock guide from the Custom PC magazine. It's probably capable of more.
But certainly, if you have the budget for an i7, go for it. Personally, I'd wait for AMD's six and eight core processors before building, since i7s are still quad cores in setup.
I wanted to get a new Motherboard i was looking to LGA sockets and i saw a 11xx type socket, looked up for a processor fitting in there, cheapest one, A FRIKKIN $300 OMG i now have a LGA775 Socked with a Intel Pentium Q8600 Quad Core 2.5GHZ wich is also good, with the same clock rate as the i5... so there is no reason to pay around 3-400 dollars on a i5 or i7 a LGA775 with a Quad Core does just as good
Yes, I5 650 is only $150 but you need to buy new mobo (ASUS EVO H57) for $200 and replace that DDR2 with DDR3 which would cost you additional $200 (for high performance 4Gb) So it will be about $500 out of pocket when going to a new system. I still think it is worh it. Thanks.
i5 does not support hyper-threading, and comes clocked lower than i7'e. unless you are going to be running multiple multithreaded programs or don't know how to overclock, an i5 will do.
like many here I'm planning to build a new PC and wile choosing the components I came across a big question.
I always thought that the intel i5 750 was better and faster than any Core 2 Duo or Core 2 Quad, then how come that a few Core 2 Quad models(Q9400/9550/9650) actually run at a higher clock and can cost much more than the i5?
@ygotcgftw just STFU intel fan boy, you dont know anything about amd, unlocked parts and best prices, better cooler, better and cheaper chipsets, better motherboards, SATA 6 Gbps support, best platform, intel is an stupid company with anticompetitive strategies, intel = monopoly
@freego56 "an stupid"? And by the way.. a monopoly means that they own the market, usually because they are better and people only want them so they will pay higher prices for them.. which seems to be mostly true about Intel.. so yeah..
I'm going to guess that none of you noobs even looked up benchmarks. Although the i5 750 is close the i7 920 the 920 is just so much more. The 920 overlocks much better. Even with the 750 being $80 less i'd still get a 920. I'm getting 4.3 gig stable out of my 920 on water. It's not just the CPU but the whole package like hyperthreading, DDR3 and up to 24 gig of it. I see what you are trying to do but if all you were doing was gaming, MAYBE but we all know that it's not just gaming.
between Core I5 and Core I7 for Gamming, don´t exist diferences!!!!, where if there diferences t´s performances for logic taks, Why? but I5 DON´T USE HYPER-THREADING, but this I5 is Arquitecture most cheaper that I7, even so for gamming the performance is equal.
Are you crazy? GPS the main bottleneck? What GPU are you running, an x1300? Your AMD was underpowered when it was new. 30k vantage, i doubt it bro. All the 9950's ive ever seen were in the 9000-11000 range. Even if you had thed POS overclocked to 5 gig it would never hit 30k.
I'm running dual XFX 9800 GTX+ in SLI on an m3n72d mobo from ASUS. GFX rating is still just 13k.
the Phenom is @ 3.0 Ghz on air (only adjusted the multiplier). I get 46c idle and 56c load on air with the geminii from cooler master. I'd say that's a solid overclock seeing as how the max temp is 65c.
RAM is 4GB Mushkin @ DDR2 1066 Mhz
You don't need a hardcore rig to get decent scores, you just need to set it up right.
Within the whole i5/i7 lineup, which processor stand right in the middle with best price/performance ratio. It's useless go spend a few more $ on something that is faster but not noticeable and actually worth the money.
That would be the i5 750. It is the cheapest, but performs just as well as the other CPUs in the lineup, which are more expensive. The LGA1156 is the choice for everyone, who do not plan to run high-end GPU's in a Crossfire/SLI configuration, like the 5870 or the upcoming DX11 cards from Nvidia.
I'm not so sure about that. AMD is coming out with their "Fusion" CPU in 2011 and also an server CPU, the 8-core Bulldozer. But Intel's Sandy Bridge, which has an similar architecture to the AMD Fusion, releases already in Q4 2010.
i7 is available for both of intels new sockets. basically an i5 is a slower processor and it doesn't have hyperthreading. that's the only difference, other than cost, that i could find
people that have the i5 2500k are just trying to make good points about it to convince themselfes that its worth haveing because they could not afford an i7 come on people i7 2600k is much better oh i7 is only a tiny bit faster lol its alot better if you ask me theres a rank structure so get an i7 and be on top of it
rmayho 1 month ago
I've got an i5 2500K and yes the i7 2600K is a better CPU, but it's 40% more expensive, and for the vast majority of stuff you do is nowhere near 40% better. Even for stuff that does take advantage of hyper threading you're not going to get anywhere near a 40% increase in performance.
It all boils down to your budget. If you want value for money then get the 2500K, if money isn't an issue get the 2600K, or if you're really nuts go for LGA 2011.
smallpebble7 4 months ago
@smallpebble7 Right, an i72600k doesn't make much of a difference on gaming compared to i5 2500k, unless you are editing video and such it does, but otherwise it is't worth 100$ more just to get some 10% or 5% performance.
Ryosuke1208 3 months ago
I have an i7 920 @ 4.3Ghz is that good. not a botleneck for a 5970?
MindSeeR666 4 months ago
3dgame man sucks COCK.
MrPassivemenis 4 months ago
Intel i5 2500K can just overclock it at the same speeds as an i7 .. i7 has 2 tiny small features which don't have anything to deal with gaming.
FEENPC 7 months ago
i5 - muscle car - stronger
i7 - sports car - faster
gamer3386 7 months ago 20
@gamer3386 So true!
Amboxer100 6 months ago
@gamer3386
muscle, sports? Computers don't work that way... weird comparisson. You got fast and faster. Its up to the software if it will actualy make a difference.
EliteGhost001 4 months ago
@gamer3386 Bull. I have an i7 2600k, I think the i7 works better
TRAUMAeagle 4 months ago
Nice straight to the point not like that other dude with the stupid voices.
lazarra101 7 months ago
Nyday i7....
abhishekmukherjee41 7 months ago
It depends. i5 are better at running gaming or other high CPU concentration while i7 are more useful at running multitasking or having alot of windows running at one time
icrywheniweewee 8 months ago
@icrywheniweewee
i5 better at gaming? Not realy...
EliteGhost001 4 months ago
@EliteGhost001 i7 is just a teensy wit better than i5 but that's saying a lot, i mean if you are only using it for gaming then the best option is an i5 2500k
Ryosuke1208 3 months ago
larger number = Better
DXXDgame 9 months ago
AMD Bulldozer KICKASS!
GermanReconHD 10 months ago
@GermanReconHD AMD Bulldozer....STILL NOT OUT! plus no games even used that many cores.
HighxTech 10 months ago
@HighxTech i know but if the bulldozer will be so good like they say Hm then Bulldozer is better but 8 cores nobody need for gaming 8 cores even the 6 cores from the x6 are enough and not totally used.But if games now minimum need 3 cores like black ops i want a CPU who has enough cores for the next years but 8 are still tooo much for gaming.Its more for working i think
GermanReconHD 10 months ago
well answered!
feliesa91 10 months ago
Intel sucks!
CoreFuse 1 year ago
@CoreFuse Why is that? Do you have an rational reasons or just gonna yell about how things suck without giving reason like a troll?
DemonAMVs 1 year ago
bought an i7 860 , went into bios and there was this magical option : Run CPU @ i7 870 settings? Me: hell yes .. so there ya go a cpu of ~280 bucks running the same settings as the one that costs ~500
LegionShade 1 year ago
@LegionShade what? an 870 costs about £5 more than a 860
Jcob91 1 year ago
@Jcob91 when it first came out here in my country the i7 870 was around ~500
LegionShade 1 year ago
i got core i7 930.
cost me about 500$ .
AMD SuX.
Herower 1 year ago
AMD x6 all the way.
Roflcopter4b 1 year ago
SO i5 760 is better that i7?!
Eragon86micky 1 year ago 8
@Eragon86micky No. But i7 is for heavy usage only. If you want games or webbrowsing or use small programs, i5 is what you need.
fixolas396 1 year ago
This is not true. It depends on RAM. And amount of core's/threads/etc.
I5 is weaker than i7. i7 is definitly the way to go.
XcelentTom 1 year ago
@haiti1800 exactly which game r u talking about, coz i run all my games at maxd out settings wit 60 fps(coz my monitor is og 60hz)
vgvgvg7412 1 year ago
Hi! can i do 5870 + GTS450 for physx? plz reply...
Drzewo97 1 year ago
@Drzewo97 should be fine, depends on the motherboard I guess, what do you have?
grimy89098 1 year ago
@grimy89098 RIIIE :E
Drzewo97 1 year ago
What PSU would you recommend for this setup;
Sabertooth X58
i7 950
6gb 1,600mb tri channel mushkin
sli gtx 465 + gts 450 physx
thanks
iggie200 1 year ago
A MMORPG game called Final Fantasy XIV utilizes hyperthreading and multiple cores and is pretty much fine tuned for the I7 processors. Would i see i big leap in performance using an Intel I7 930 processor over an I5 750 processor?
Scott97169 1 year ago
@Scott97169 u will see 0 diffrence..
Xantis2006 1 year ago
gonna run 1156 socket, whit a GTX 460 Cyclone or a ATi 5850, only use my computer for gaming and dont really have many programs open at the same time maybe use Photoshop sometimes ;)
So question is, what prosessor should i use? :/
SyntoxStudios 1 year ago
@SyntoxStudios
Core i5-750 or Core i5-760 would probably both be great.
Depending on what games a Core i3-530 might be fine too.
Usul573 1 year ago
@SyntoxStudios IMO, most of the power comes out of GPU so buy yourself a nice GPU (460 and 5850 are both very good, i choose 5850(not a fanboy)) and a AMD CPU, quad core would be nice, and that is all you need for gaming, I bought AMD + ATi and I'm very happy with the rig...
Will save you a couple of bucks 2 :)
MakingYouSad 1 year ago
@SyntoxStudios A quad core is always good, so, an I5 760. also, the gtx's have cuda, so thats great for photoshop.
k1llgor3 1 year ago
@k1llgor3
Isn't photoshop mostly affected by CPU?
GPU can help it sometimes, probably not much.
Usul573 1 year ago
@Usul573 It runs smoother with any newer Nvidea cards, they have CUDA, which makes photoshop run smoother.
k1llgor3 1 year ago
@k1llgor3
Ah, yeah a demo did show it previewing and saving faster with CUDA, but I don't remember it being that slow.
I guess it does help with bigger images and stuff, good to have I guess.
Usul573 1 year ago
AMD for ever!!!! kick intel ass and bring us best prices!!! black editon!! and unlocked cores!! and GPUs!!! "the future is kick intel ass"
freego56 1 year ago
i3 preforms way better than a i5. i would never buy i5. either i3 or i7.
ygotcgftw 1 year ago
@ygotcgftw
Core i5-750 quad core is really good.
Usul573 1 year ago
@Usul573 Nu, 760, its like 4 dollars more.
k1llgor3 1 year ago
@ygotcgftw You can't even get an i3 with quad cores can you? i5's are awesome, I have a 750 and it's great.
SilverJigProductions 1 year ago
If you are building a game pc you shouldnt buy an i7, i5 and i7 are equal in gaming performance. The difference is the HyperThreading which you dont really need in gaming becouse games dont support that much threats. Sometimes i5 is even better.
HeyItsMeDaniel 1 year ago
im saying get an i3 with a good cooler and overclock it to 4.2-4.4Ghz
IgorKizejev 1 year ago
i have an i5 laptop, and let me tell you its amazing. get an i5. great performance.
motosportjunkie 1 year ago
The only difference between i5 750 and i7 860 is that the i7 got HT 4 cores and 8 threads.
WILDSTYLE1000 1 year ago
@WILDSTYLE1000 core i5 750: 2.66Ghz, 8Mb, 4T core i7 860: 2.80Ghz, 8Mb, 8T
So yes, the difference is very small, I personally needed 2 weeks to decide between those 2, and then I went for the i7, the only problem is that you can't run it well with the stock cooler, so I use it with corsair h50 liquid cooler...
anyway also price difference is really small!
coccoborg 1 year ago
@coccoborg I choosed the i5, because it was in my price range. :)
And i'm happy for that, cuz i don't have more than 1 or programs opened at the same time, and mostly i'm using my computer to gaming and doing homeworks. And if u buy an i5, u have more money to get a much better graphics card. For examle a HD5870 Vapor-X, If i choosed i7 860, then I've had take the 5850 to keep it in my budget.
WILDSTYLE1000 1 year ago
yeah i got a i7. i got a i7 920 with 2.67 ghz i didnt choose it came with the comp plus i have 9gigs of ram 1tb of hard drive space and a Nvidia gtx 260 so is my computer good or am i gonna have to upgrade really soon im used to having a shitty computer and having bad experiances with alienware i always feel like somehting is gonna go wrong so idk main reason is i have gta 4 on the pc and my other games run fine and overall gta runs fun but i always get these flickering textures.
gondule 1 year ago
@gondule this is a reply to my last message: from something far away but when i get close it stops. it also sometimes happens to me when im up close on ither billboards and mostally decals like graffiti or blood i just wanna knwo what im doing wrong cause idk if im supposed to download some stuff on my comp to acces its full potential all i did was open it up and install oblivion be nie to hear your point of view since you know so much about PC's.
gondule 1 year ago
Id check all the power connections check the power supply make sure there is no dirt in the case also check the gpu temp ect.
thereddog223 1 year ago
i5 all the way.... i7 is just for those over enthusiastic ppl. performance wise i5 should be way more than enof, regradless of what u do, make sure in i5, u buy i5-750
vgvgvg7412 1 year ago 31
@vgvgvg7412 That's what I have! =] It's awesome.
SilverJigProductions 1 year ago
@vgvgvg7412 760!
funnyfootballs 1 year ago
@vgvgvg7412 I have an I5 with a MUX 120 black, temps range from 30-40 un clocked and 40-50 to 3.20 ghz with that heatsink. I recommend it for a $70 au price is good money.
DemonAMVs 1 year ago
@vgvgvg7412 FAGGOT!
RoboticusMusic 4 months ago
@TheMadOrc Thats because dual core is old an shit ^^
UnrealGlider 1 year ago
@TheMadOrc Uhh.. have you actually seen any of the 965 vs i5 benches? They are pretty similar...
Besides, quad core is old hack now. when you can get an AMD 6 core for under £200 ^^
UnrealGlider 1 year ago
And it does not perform that well in games.
thereddog223 1 year ago
i5! best price/performance ratio!
300 bucks for hyperthreading pluss 200 more dollars for mobo and ram? fuck that!
captainclayman 1 year ago
i 3 ftw
Kevinmaxtor 1 year ago
This is the exact information I wanted.
Thanks.
jcii2 1 year ago
Why are gmaers waiting for 6/8 core cpu's?
Games won't be using them properly for a long time.
Ninjamonkeypirates 2 years ago
agreed. i run games on my dul core 18ghz just fine lmao. whats the fuss
TandTProject 1 year ago
i have an i5-750 with MSI H55M-E33 mobo along with ATI HD5770 video card. Its currently running at the normal stock speed but its already performing very nicely. I just bought a Coolermaster Hyper 212 and im overclocking it very soon :D
renekenshin6573 2 years ago
My recommendation, get an i5 750 2.66GHz, and overclock it. It's capable of doing 3.8GHz which is pretty darn good
RYjet911 2 years ago
The i7 has more threads though and I believe it can over clock to 4.0GHZ
michel8764 2 years ago
Oh yeah, certainly.
Just depends on your budget.
I have a £600 i5 setup. i7's seem more suited to a £1000 setup with more then 4 GB RAM and a graphics card better than a Radeon 4870.
Even then, 3.8 GHz is just from following an easy to do overclock guide from the Custom PC magazine. It's probably capable of more.
But certainly, if you have the budget for an i7, go for it. Personally, I'd wait for AMD's six and eight core processors before building, since i7s are still quad cores in setup.
RYjet911 2 years ago
Then the next question is, I7 on 1156 or 1366?
chakiller36 2 years ago
when he says i7 he is referring to 1366, it was stupid marketing to name some of the 1156 models i7
demps709 2 years ago
From what Ive read in many other sites I got the impression that the i7 1156 is actually overall better than the i7 1366.
BK0125 2 years ago
just add in like 50 dollars and get yourself an i7. i5 is almost the same shit as quad core because it doesnt have thread like the i7.
qbthething 2 years ago
I wanted to get a new Motherboard i was looking to LGA sockets and i saw a 11xx type socket, looked up for a processor fitting in there, cheapest one, A FRIKKIN $300 OMG i now have a LGA775 Socked with a Intel Pentium Q8600 Quad Core 2.5GHZ wich is also good, with the same clock rate as the i5... so there is no reason to pay around 3-400 dollars on a i5 or i7 a LGA775 with a Quad Core does just as good
pikathomas 2 years ago
@pikathomas i5 or i7 don't have FSB therefore are much better in performance.. no matter the clock speed.
the i5 is only 200$ so its not much at all
erad1cates 2 years ago
@erad1cates
Yes, I5 650 is only $150 but you need to buy new mobo (ASUS EVO H57) for $200 and replace that DDR2 with DDR3 which would cost you additional $200 (for high performance 4Gb) So it will be about $500 out of pocket when going to a new system. I still think it is worh it. Thanks.
zkrakowa 2 years ago
@pikathomas
Well the I5 with 2,66 GHz si faster than Intel Q xxxx whit same speed . This processor is even fasetr than a 3 Ghz Qxxxx -series processor
al2216ww 2 years ago
most LGA1156 mobos come with forms of OC GENE built in, dont they?
MegaRandomGamer 2 years ago
Does he say i5 or i7, sorry the volume on my laptop like...screwed up.
OMGitsSHAHN 2 years ago
i5 does not support hyper-threading, and comes clocked lower than i7'e. unless you are going to be running multiple multithreaded programs or don't know how to overclock, an i5 will do.
mikitymike 2 years ago
I recently bought an i7 system because I dont get a new pc often (5-8 years), and the LGA1366 socket will have more life to it.
jsparkss 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i know what cpu is faster then the i5 and i7....the icpu from apple will beat it...coming december 2019 10cores
50mb cache and a drink holder!!!!!
qbthething 2 years ago
intel has already announced a 6 core cpu for next year with HT, that makes 12 cores, virtually.
ya64 2 years ago
Hi everyone,
like many here I'm planning to build a new PC and wile choosing the components I came across a big question.
I always thought that the intel i5 750 was better and faster than any Core 2 Duo or Core 2 Quad, then how come that a few Core 2 Quad models(Q9400/9550/9650) actually run at a higher clock and can cost much more than the i5?
Please Help me out with thisone guys, thanx.
DrSAM69 2 years ago
Im going with AMD soon they a cheaper for me and deliver in performance. Same reason i buy Ati graphic cards.
PCgame4life 2 years ago 15
im with you on that, intel performs a little bit better, the i5 being the best
suckseggs 2 years ago
Price wise not really and the 750 is about equal to all of amds 4 core cpus.
thereddog223 1 year ago
@PCgame4life the thing is that Intel performs better. I have an i5 and it is a great CPU.
groberti 1 year ago
@PCgame4life amd?? performance?? dont make me laugh. amd is garbage.
ygotcgftw 1 year ago
@ygotcgftw Well im still maxing my games so i dont give a fuck what you think.
PCgame4life 1 year ago
@ygotcgftw just STFU intel fan boy, you dont know anything about amd, unlocked parts and best prices, better cooler, better and cheaper chipsets, better motherboards, SATA 6 Gbps support, best platform, intel is an stupid company with anticompetitive strategies, intel = monopoly
freego56 1 year ago
@freego56 Guite the list you have there.
k1llgor3 1 year ago
@freego56 "an stupid"? And by the way.. a monopoly means that they own the market, usually because they are better and people only want them so they will pay higher prices for them.. which seems to be mostly true about Intel.. so yeah..
SilverJigProductions 1 year ago
@ygotcgftw kinda, the top of the line amd processor is only about as powerful as an i5.
k1llgor3 1 year ago
@PCgame4life I was gonna AMD x6 now because priced dropped but choose intel instead because they simply are better in performance.
hunterto99 1 year ago
@PCgame4life ati cards are more expensive, but they are better
spezow1234 1 year ago
@spezow1234 ATi is now no more. It's now AMD. And nVidia are more expensive.
wwyk1993 1 year ago
@wwyk1993 really?
spezow1234 1 year ago
@spezow1234 Compare the most expensive that nVidia has to offer and the highest end from AMD.
wwyk1993 1 year ago
Yeah I never buy the latest and greatest, you just pay so much more for a small increase in performance :\
PCMichiana 2 years ago
if you were going with an i7 with 3 graphics cards... 1156 based or 1366 based?
nathan42100 2 years ago
1366 will be phased soon, so definitely go for the 1156.
tedstar 2 years ago
1366 will remain the enthusiast chipset
expect 1156 to take over the 775 as mainstream
godwar99 2 years ago
Where are you getting that info?
ryotaryuu 2 years ago
It was an old rumor. My mistake.
tedstar 2 years ago
thanks
ryotaryuu 2 years ago
1366 as they support full tri sli
godwar99 2 years ago
for how many years do you think my setup will be able to play the top games, as long as I keep on upgrading the GPU?
i7 920 @3.6ghz
6gb ddr3 (can add more later if needed)
4870x2 (may change soon)
Asus p6t deluxe v2
jin37uk 2 years ago
at least 2 years... games haven't caught up to our computer's specs yet
trousien 2 years ago
Wasn't this pretty much self-explanatory?
kintaman2 2 years ago
I'm going to guess that none of you noobs even looked up benchmarks. Although the i5 750 is close the i7 920 the 920 is just so much more. The 920 overlocks much better. Even with the 750 being $80 less i'd still get a 920. I'm getting 4.3 gig stable out of my 920 on water. It's not just the CPU but the whole package like hyperthreading, DDR3 and up to 24 gig of it. I see what you are trying to do but if all you were doing was gaming, MAYBE but we all know that it's not just gaming.
ryotaryuu 2 years ago
just $80? remember you still have to buy another stick of ram, and a new mobo which costs way more for the same features as an 1156 mobo.
tyuo9980 2 years ago
Really?
between Core I5 and Core I7 for Gamming, don´t exist diferences!!!!, where if there diferences t´s performances for logic taks, Why? but I5 DON´T USE HYPER-THREADING, but this I5 is Arquitecture most cheaper that I7, even so for gamming the performance is equal.
Xloko12 2 years ago
i7 you stupid faggot
KatsumiCoin 2 years ago
The title should be 1366 or 1156.
As there are 1156 i7's.
iNfx1 2 years ago 3
My AMD Phenom 9950 BE just turned one year old this month but I still routinely get CPU scores of 30-31k on 3dmark Vantage...
Video cards are STILL the main bottleneck guys...
radicalgarbage02 2 years ago
Are you crazy? GPS the main bottleneck? What GPU are you running, an x1300? Your AMD was underpowered when it was new. 30k vantage, i doubt it bro. All the 9950's ive ever seen were in the 9000-11000 range. Even if you had thed POS overclocked to 5 gig it would never hit 30k.
ryotaryuu 2 years ago
I'm running Vantage on performance setting.
I'm running dual XFX 9800 GTX+ in SLI on an m3n72d mobo from ASUS. GFX rating is still just 13k.
the Phenom is @ 3.0 Ghz on air (only adjusted the multiplier). I get 46c idle and 56c load on air with the geminii from cooler master. I'd say that's a solid overclock seeing as how the max temp is 65c.
RAM is 4GB Mushkin @ DDR2 1066 Mhz
You don't need a hardcore rig to get decent scores, you just need to set it up right.
radicalgarbage02 2 years ago
Vantage accounts for PhysX by adding it to the CPU score. He's got two NVIDIA cards.
PianoGermz 2 years ago
30-31k in Vantage doesn't say much.
Almost as if I'd say I get 60 FPS in Crysis without mentioning the graphics settings. ;)
And, well, yeah... GPU speed most of the time more important than CPU. But it varies of course.
Gw2Archon 2 years ago 2
tool.
tombmxcrowley 2 years ago
how about P4 build :)???
r2stik 2 years ago
i say neither, no one really needs an i7 or i5 unless your doing benchmarks all day. get a 955 and get ur self a 400 dollar hair cut.
xKILLZONAx 2 years ago 9
No one needs a 955, you can check your mail and surf on your grandmothers PC.
JudeBenke 2 years ago
the i5 750 is only 200 the 965 is almost 200 and the 955 is not far behind might as well go intel.
thereddog223 1 year ago
@xKILLZONAx i5 and i7 are not for benchmark.. idiot
AndreaFranchitti 1 year ago
Even a Q9XXX from the LGA 775 series would be good to last. It's mostly a software issue now in terms of performance.
Snapscape 2 years ago
I would go with socket 1366 since the new i9 will have this socket and would be easy to just upgrade your CPU to the new 6 core
spartalis 2 years ago 4
That's exactly what I was thinking :D
GamblerBE 2 years ago
yeah and they will also cost big times and make you poor for the rest of your life.
For extreme users=corei7 9xx (socket 1366)
For mainstream/gaming=corei7/corei5 (socket 1156)
I can guarantee that socket 1156 is a bigger hit and will live more than socket 1366.
hussainmushahid 2 years ago
i would still go with the i7 920 tooo other than the i5. But of course i5 is the best bang for your buck in the intel familly.
cisco760ca 2 years ago
Yeah of course the i7 920 is good too. But for an single-GPU rig, it would be quite a waste, since the CPU, mobo and RAM will cost more.
videosurfer69 2 years ago 2
Within the whole i5/i7 lineup, which processor stand right in the middle with best price/performance ratio. It's useless go spend a few more $ on something that is faster but not noticeable and actually worth the money.
jjamendoza 2 years ago
That would be the i5 750. It is the cheapest, but performs just as well as the other CPUs in the lineup, which are more expensive. The LGA1156 is the choice for everyone, who do not plan to run high-end GPU's in a Crossfire/SLI configuration, like the 5870 or the upcoming DX11 cards from Nvidia.
videosurfer69 2 years ago
4 cores but 8 threds
bloodduty 2 years ago
I think a better question would've been .... 'socket 1156 or 1366 ' ,as both can caryy i7 variants.
NoGufff 2 years ago 3
blocking people for no reason is not nice.
styrubaor 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
screw both, ill stick with AMD
dacasman 2 years ago
And be a year behind the rest of the world? No thanks.
xXSinsearXx 2 years ago 4
they are more reliable and run cooler though
dacasman 2 years ago
Burn and die, fowl demon!
JavaCrammer 2 years ago
Or extremely fast. Not necessarily "fastest".
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
its like a simulated 8 cpu's
but its actually 4.i think they are hyperthreads..
jayrockkz 2 years ago
no.... just one cpu with 4 cores with hyper threading
salsa2good 2 years ago
Comment removed
charray 2 years ago
cant wait for the Core i9 (6 core) CPU :D
ClantonNetwork 2 years ago
And hyperthreading, but AMD will probably be releasing their 6core CPU's before Intel.
Myztik7 2 years ago
AMD has already had out a 6-core processor for months. It's called the "Istanbul" AMD Opteron.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
Yeah but that's a server processor aint it? I'm talking about those intended for desktops
Myztik7 2 years ago
Well, yeah, I guess you're right. But still, it's a six-core processor. AMD is coming out with a Phenom II X6 too, though.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
I'm not so sure about that. AMD is coming out with their "Fusion" CPU in 2011 and also an server CPU, the 8-core Bulldozer. But Intel's Sandy Bridge, which has an similar architecture to the AMD Fusion, releases already in Q4 2010.
videosurfer69 2 years ago
of course you went with an i7 rodney, your rich and evil.
thornygravy 2 years ago 5
and you could go with the i7 but the 800 series
grayfox106 2 years ago
what the? there's an i9? wow... cool.
rollcanja 2 years ago
dont get a core i7 or a core i5 wait for the core i9
6 cores + hyper threading =12 cores! can you say "overkill"?
ch40t1cM0DdEr 2 years ago
the cheapest I9 CPU start with USD999...
yyyyyyexe963 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Shut up faggot like fuck you know the actual price.
crissglitch666 2 years ago
Are you serious?
n8tedog2002 2 years ago
the price will be overkill at launch too, knowing Intel.
TheGreatStash1994 2 years ago 2
A) overkill for 90% of people and B) will cost far far more then a i7.
DarkCraft41 2 years ago
Anyone give me some advice?
Should I get an i7 920 with a 4770
OR
i5 750 with a 4850?
Thanks for your feedback.
MasterSighlis555 2 years ago
go with the i5. These days Gaming is more GPU demanding than CPU. And try to get a 4870 instead ?
maples78 2 years ago
this.
:P but GTA IV is more CPU T_T sob...
kevaughanshiu 2 years ago
i5 should suffice
siedpe13 2 years ago
Core i5 750 is faster in games than the i7 920. Go with the i5 and HD 4850 since both are better for games.
Atheismrulez 2 years ago
i5 what is that
i herd about i7 but not i5
thenewsun56 2 years ago
i7 is available for both of intels new sockets. basically an i5 is a slower processor and it doesn't have hyperthreading. that's the only difference, other than cost, that i could find
InternetSandman 2 years ago