The current events we are witnessing in the Arab world indicate the rise of the Caliphate.God chose Arabs to lead the muslim world. As you can see that without Arab unity no muslim unity therefore no Caliphate.Egypt will lead this unity.
@Jamila0502 Sister, im Arab and love the Prophets people. But its good to be fair to the other races that helped Islam become great too. The Turks in particular took over from the Arabs and helped Islam achieve greatness...look at the Seljuks and Ottomans...even the berbers helped the Arabs in Al Andalus once the Arabs left the hardiness of the desert.....Saladin was Kurd and he defended the land of the Sham from the crusaders....this is why i love Islam...
@Islam4life2010 Islam was never about race...but faith and unity. But yes, i agree 100 % that it is now the time for the Arabs to rise once again....Islam began in Makkah and according to the hadith will end in bilad al sham and particularly palestine.....the khilafah will return to its original home as the prophet stated and this is bilad al sham in general and Al Aqsa in particular....and God bless our Egyptian brothers...for their contribution to Islam...now and in history
Saladin although they said he was Kurdish yet he never knew the language or spoke kurdish,there is skeptisism about that, he was born in Takrit Iraq not northern Iraq .you said don t talk about race look how these so called muslims commenting bellow how they talked about thier races some of them are proud of thier Mongolian race more than bieng a muslim what im saying is Arab countries have many factors to help them unite such as language,culture and religion
Besides most of the Islamic battles were fought by Arabs on Arab soil.Arabs made many sacrifices fought tough wars while so called muslims set and watched.
Arabs always were at the front fighting for Islam.The Mumluks were trained by Arabs most of the army that defeated the Mongols were Arab fighters from Egypt and Syria and neighbouring Arab countries .God chose them for a reason they are brave,tough,and known for their furouseness in battles.They never give up.Look how they stood up to tyrants and invaders.may God bless them
Mogolian stopped fighting mostly because of their own event: the death of the great khan, Genghis khan's grandson from his 4 sons raced back for their internal power struggle. Western Europe and Egypt were saved. otherwise nothing could stop them at their time. this video only focused one battle, lack of big picture.
u r right.like the semitic migration which ended with the last great arab cnoquest and the rise of islam,similarly thee central asian migration from altai to india,iran and europe was ended with great mongolia conquest allied with tatars and turks.i am pashtuns by birth my forefather also came from here is is the birthplace of many vigorous and noble barbarians
@Jamila0502 It took Mongolians 30+ years to conquer China. From many sources, including Japanese, Chinese and western (I am Chinese live in USA), Mongolians stopped extending their land after the Great Khan (son of Genghis Khan) died because of the power struggle and the United Mongolians were never exist again. They ruled separately and started focusing on the existing land instead. Western Europe and Egypt were saved mostly by these not by one or two failed attempts.
@Jamila0502 More details: Mongke Khan is the grant son of Genghis Khan.
In 1259 Mongke Khan died while attacking the Sung Chinese, terminating the campaign and prompting other Mongol leaders to end their own operations. Thus, Hulegu never made any further conquests. He did, however, quite wisely hold onto what he had already captured. In the years to come, he set up his own separate, personal Mongol realm, or khanate, which, centered in Persia, became known as the Il-khanate.
Mongke Khan, Kublai Khan, Ariq Böke, Hulagu Khan were all sons of Genghis Khan's son Tolui w. his principle wife. Hulagu was sent by Mongke Khan to middle east, after Mongke Khan died, Many Mongolians princes raced back. Kublai and Arig Boke fought for the successor and Kublai won. Persia and China had better relation with more culture exchange and trade since the Hulagu shared same mother with Kublai and officially recognized Kublai as Great Khan, but independent in reality.
In 1260, Hulagu sent envoys to Qutuz in Cairo, demanding his surrender:
From the King of Kings of the East and West, the Great Khan. To Qutuz the Mamluk, who fled to escape our swords. You should think of what happened to other countries and submit to us. You have heard how we have conquered a vast empire and have purified the earth of the disorders that tainted it. We have conquered vast areas, massacring all the people. You cannot escape from the terror of our armies.
Where can you flee? What road will you use to escape us? Our horses are swift, our arrows sharp, our swords like thunderbolts, our hearts as hard as the mountains, our soldiers as numerous as the sand. Fortresses will not detain us, nor arms stop us. Your prayers to God will not avail against us. We are not moved by tears nor touched by lamentations. Only those who beg our protection will be safe. Hasten your reply before the fire of war is kindled. Resist and you will sufffer
We will shatter your mosques and reveal the weakness of your God and then will kill your children and your old men together. At present you are the only enemy against whom we have to march.[3]
Qutuz responded, however, by killing the envoys and displaying their heads on Bab Zuweila, one of the gates of Cairo.
@Jamila0502 Again, you missed my point. Mongolian's focus CHANGED After the Monke Khan died since the United Mongolian never exist and they never put enough resource fighting in middle east. The few battles and some treat means not much for the whole picture. Their great Khan Kublai focused on fighting Chinese (they crushed the last army of Chinese around 1279, after 30+ years and the death of Monke Khan in the battle).
@Jamila0502 Kublai kept the death of Mengke Khan for a while since he would like to finished a battle at first then his wife and other advisors sent many emergency messages telling his younger brother were ready to claim the Great Khan.
the muslim leader at "Ayn Jalut " battle was Qotoz " Saef Al -Din Qotoz"- who was the sultan of Egypt- not Baybars .....Baybars was one of the army leaders , and succeeded Qotoz after his death , and also was victorious in many battles
@Jamila0502 the battle of Ayn jalut was very interesting...for the first time Baybars was forced to not only rely on the Mamluks ( Circassians, chechen tribes) but also on Arab Bedouins and Turkmons....it was a united effort which tells us once again....from unity comes power...not from nationalism
@Skyguyfrom501legion Brother...Islam is about mercy...not killing.....when killing is condoned it is only in self defence...not pillage...otherwise how are we different to the mongols and crusaders.
I wonder what had happened if the crusaders of Palestine wouldn't be neutral and would have attacked the Muslims as well. Of course Islam would win but what would have been the situation tactically?
@sipraomer Well with the will of Allah, they decided to remain neutral as they knew that their turn would be next....they thought they would be clever by siding with the winner and were obviously betting on the mongols...however, Baybars smashes the mongols and follows this by taking on the rest of the crusader kingdoms one and by one until they were all kicked out.
I understand that the Mamluks played a large role in pushing back Hulagu's army, but you should have also mentioned Berke Khan who also played a major role in this conflict. For instance, as a recent convert to Islam he re-united the Golden Horde and waged war on Hulagu. Also the last picture is not baybars, its Sultan Mehmet II at the gates of the newly conquered Constantinople.
The Mongols made up for it, they converted to Islam, that is more important than any materialistic entity on this planet. Muslims don't care what destruction they caused, what's important for them is that God led them to the straight path. Mashallah.
I think we can all agree however that the Battle of Ain Jalut was a moment of great pride for Islam and for Muslims. Ain Jalut was a battle almost as pivotal as those at Karbala, and the Badr. Ain Jalut was the Tours of the Islamic world, when Muslims united under a common banner to challenge the Unstoppable Mongol War Machine. Ain Jalut is where we made our stand, and where we held them at bay while the "mighty" Western kingdoms were clambering and kneeling at the feet of Hulagu.
@Killzoneguy117 the "Mighty western kingdoms" were not "kneeling at the feet of Hulegu," unless you count "the west" as "west" of the Mongolian steppes, and thusly Mawarenahr, Khurasan, and the Azerbaijan areas. And as far as Ain Jalut being "the Tours of the Islamic world," you should take into account the fact that the battle was more about the Mongol's small force and lack of tactical command. It had nothing to do with ideology.
@Killzoneguy117 Christians and Muslims to this day like to shape the whole historical narrative to their liking when it comes to the Mongols and religion. Most historians agree that it was not a defining factor in Mongol policy. The Mongols didn't care what your religion was, as long as you submitted to the Khagan. Remember, many Muslims in Iran were happy at the destruction of their Ismai'li coreligionists, and many Muslims volunteered to help them (Rashid al Din?).
@Killzoneguy117 What was at stake was in fact the nascent post-Ayyubid Mameluk dynasty. The stability of the Cairene sultans was tenuous at best, and after the sack of Baghdad, there was a power vacuum that left the early Mameluks in the position of supremacy in the region. They adopted the Abbasid princes as part of their retinue, if only to achieve legitimacy. Ain Jalut paved the way for Baybars, and far from "uniting" Muslims, it helped to reignite the Sunni/Shia schism.
This is complete propaganda. The fact is, the Crusaders kicked the shit out of the muslims the vast majority of the time even though the crusaders were vastly outnumbered. Saladin himself was beaten first by the 16 year old king Baldwin and then on 3 separate occasions by King Richard the Lion heart.
The battles of Ayn Jalut September 1260 against Mongols AD,Hattin July 1187 against crusaders both are recoreded and mentioned in history.No fiction here
Baibars or Baybarsal-Malik al-Zahir Rukn al-Din Baibars, nicknamed Abu l-Futuh[1] (Arabic: أبو الفتوح) (1223 July 1, 1277, Damascus), was a Mamluk Sultan of Egypt. He was one of the commanders of the forces which inflicted a devastating defeat on the Seventh Crusade of King Louis IX of France and he led the vanguard of the Egyptian army at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260,[2] which marked the first substantial defeat of the Mongol army and is considered a turning point in history.
There is a big historical inaccuracy in this video. The Mongols were led by Kitbuqa (a Nestorian christian), a general of Hulagu since Hulagu had left the Levant with most of his forces in order to attend the Khuriltai.
@Janmejaya9 and which history are you reading?? The Islamic, western or oriental one? My sources are Islamic....any perspective other than that does not interest me in the slightest,
@Islam4life2010 Can you cite your Islamic sources? My sources are both the Mongol and Islamic writings which themselves have been confirmed by Western scholars. The accounts of Fatimid Egypt themselves say that it was Kitbuqa Noyan who led the Mongol armies and not Hulagu. Hulagu did try to attack egypt post ain-jalut but was always occupied by pre-emptive attacks from the Golden Horde.
@Islam4life2010 Sorry I don't know Arabic but different historical accounts do confirm that there never was a direct confrontation between Baybars and Hulagu.And yes Baybars did defeat the Mongol army at Ain-Jalut but the Mongol commander was Kitbuqa and not Hulagu. That is full stop for all the avid followers of history.
@Janmejaya9 there are several accounts of the muslim-mongol clash...irrespective of the angle we take...history does support the view that the mameluks were victorious over the mongols after the victory of Ayn Jalut......yes..the mongols did become divided after this period...but thats history for you...no particular dynasty can remain united forever and eventually the victorious becomes defeated and the defeated in turn becomes victorious....
@Janmejaya9 Besides,I do not take the Fatmid account as historical in anyway...besides, the fatmids were not around during the mongol invasion since we know that Saladin rid Egypt of them heretics!
soon islam will rise up again and we will do the same to america and its allies what we did to mongols and its allies...defeat is on its way america...
You forgot something important: 3 out of 4 Mongol Empires after Chinggis Khan became Muslim mainly through the Muslim Sufis.
kazakhseven 3 weeks ago
The current events we are witnessing in the Arab world indicate the rise of the Caliphate.God chose Arabs to lead the muslim world. As you can see that without Arab unity no muslim unity therefore no Caliphate.Egypt will lead this unity.
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
@Jamila0502 Sister, im Arab and love the Prophets people. But its good to be fair to the other races that helped Islam become great too. The Turks in particular took over from the Arabs and helped Islam achieve greatness...look at the Seljuks and Ottomans...even the berbers helped the Arabs in Al Andalus once the Arabs left the hardiness of the desert.....Saladin was Kurd and he defended the land of the Sham from the crusaders....this is why i love Islam...
Islam4life2010 3 weeks ago
@Islam4life2010 Islam was never about race...but faith and unity. But yes, i agree 100 % that it is now the time for the Arabs to rise once again....Islam began in Makkah and according to the hadith will end in bilad al sham and particularly palestine.....the khilafah will return to its original home as the prophet stated and this is bilad al sham in general and Al Aqsa in particular....and God bless our Egyptian brothers...for their contribution to Islam...now and in history
Islam4life2010 3 weeks ago
@Islam4life2010
Saladin although they said he was Kurdish yet he never knew the language or spoke kurdish,there is skeptisism about that, he was born in Takrit Iraq not northern Iraq .you said don t talk about race look how these so called muslims commenting bellow how they talked about thier races some of them are proud of thier Mongolian race more than bieng a muslim what im saying is Arab countries have many factors to help them unite such as language,culture and religion
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
@Islam4life2010
Besides most of the Islamic battles were fought by Arabs on Arab soil.Arabs made many sacrifices fought tough wars while so called muslims set and watched.
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
Arabs always were at the front fighting for Islam.The Mumluks were trained by Arabs most of the army that defeated the Mongols were Arab fighters from Egypt and Syria and neighbouring Arab countries .God chose them for a reason they are brave,tough,and known for their furouseness in battles.They never give up.Look how they stood up to tyrants and invaders.may God bless them
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
Mogolian stopped fighting mostly because of their own event: the death of the great khan, Genghis khan's grandson from his 4 sons raced back for their internal power struggle. Western Europe and Egypt were saved. otherwise nothing could stop them at their time. this video only focused one battle, lack of big picture.
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
@oneofssn
u r right.like the semitic migration which ended with the last great arab cnoquest and the rise of islam,similarly thee central asian migration from altai to india,iran and europe was ended with great mongolia conquest allied with tatars and turks.i am pashtuns by birth my forefather also came from here is is the birthplace of many vigorous and noble barbarians
kandahar0 3 weeks ago
@oneofssn
what big picture are you talking about? Mongols and crusaders were defeated on Arab land fair and square.They messed with the wrong people
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
@Jamila0502 It took Mongolians 30+ years to conquer China. From many sources, including Japanese, Chinese and western (I am Chinese live in USA), Mongolians stopped extending their land after the Great Khan (son of Genghis Khan) died because of the power struggle and the United Mongolians were never exist again. They ruled separately and started focusing on the existing land instead. Western Europe and Egypt were saved mostly by these not by one or two failed attempts.
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
@Jamila0502 More details: Mongke Khan is the grant son of Genghis Khan.
In 1259 Mongke Khan died while attacking the Sung Chinese, terminating the campaign and prompting other Mongol leaders to end their own operations. Thus, Hulegu never made any further conquests. He did, however, quite wisely hold onto what he had already captured. In the years to come, he set up his own separate, personal Mongol realm, or khanate, which, centered in Persia, became known as the Il-khanate.
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
Mongke Khan, Kublai Khan, Ariq Böke, Hulagu Khan were all sons of Genghis Khan's son Tolui w. his principle wife. Hulagu was sent by Mongke Khan to middle east, after Mongke Khan died, Many Mongolians princes raced back. Kublai and Arig Boke fought for the successor and Kublai won. Persia and China had better relation with more culture exchange and trade since the Hulagu shared same mother with Kublai and officially recognized Kublai as Great Khan, but independent in reality.
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
@oneofssn
In 1260, Hulagu sent envoys to Qutuz in Cairo, demanding his surrender:
From the King of Kings of the East and West, the Great Khan. To Qutuz the Mamluk, who fled to escape our swords. You should think of what happened to other countries and submit to us. You have heard how we have conquered a vast empire and have purified the earth of the disorders that tainted it. We have conquered vast areas, massacring all the people. You cannot escape from the terror of our armies.
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
Where can you flee? What road will you use to escape us? Our horses are swift, our arrows sharp, our swords like thunderbolts, our hearts as hard as the mountains, our soldiers as numerous as the sand. Fortresses will not detain us, nor arms stop us. Your prayers to God will not avail against us. We are not moved by tears nor touched by lamentations. Only those who beg our protection will be safe. Hasten your reply before the fire of war is kindled. Resist and you will sufffer
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
We will shatter your mosques and reveal the weakness of your God and then will kill your children and your old men together. At present you are the only enemy against whom we have to march.[3]
Qutuz responded, however, by killing the envoys and displaying their heads on Bab Zuweila, one of the gates of Cairo.
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
This was the message from Hulagu Khan to the ruler of Egypt. and it is documented and prove that hulagu khan was in fact leading the battle.
Jamila0502 3 weeks ago
@Jamila0502 Again, you missed my point. Mongolian's focus CHANGED After the Monke Khan died since the United Mongolian never exist and they never put enough resource fighting in middle east. The few battles and some treat means not much for the whole picture. Their great Khan Kublai focused on fighting Chinese (they crushed the last army of Chinese around 1279, after 30+ years and the death of Monke Khan in the battle).
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
@Jamila0502 Kublai kept the death of Mengke Khan for a while since he would like to finished a battle at first then his wife and other advisors sent many emergency messages telling his younger brother were ready to claim the Great Khan.
oneofssn 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the muslim leader at "Ayn Jalut " battle was Qotoz " Saef Al -Din Qotoz"- who was the sultan of Egypt- not Baybars .....Baybars was one of the army leaders , and succeeded Qotoz after his death , and also was victorious in many battles
strike742 1 month ago
Baibars was great general but he wouldn t have defeated the Mongols by hiself without Arab mujahideen.Baibars ruled Syria and Egypt
Jamila0502 1 month ago
@Jamila0502 the battle of Ayn jalut was very interesting...for the first time Baybars was forced to not only rely on the Mamluks ( Circassians, chechen tribes) but also on Arab Bedouins and Turkmons....it was a united effort which tells us once again....from unity comes power...not from nationalism
Islam4life2010 1 month ago
Mongols didnt became muslim anyway dont show mercy to kaffirs comrades
Skyguyfrom501legion 1 month ago
Muslim need to create united ummah and islamic army , our new war toys will be tested on mongols we are gonna rape and kill these evil kaffir bitches
Skyguyfrom501legion 1 month ago
@Skyguyfrom501legion Brother...Islam is about mercy...not killing.....when killing is condoned it is only in self defence...not pillage...otherwise how are we different to the mongols and crusaders.
Islam4life2010 1 month ago
I wonder what had happened if the crusaders of Palestine wouldn't be neutral and would have attacked the Muslims as well. Of course Islam would win but what would have been the situation tactically?
sipraomer 1 month ago
@sipraomer Well with the will of Allah, they decided to remain neutral as they knew that their turn would be next....they thought they would be clever by siding with the winner and were obviously betting on the mongols...however, Baybars smashes the mongols and follows this by taking on the rest of the crusader kingdoms one and by one until they were all kicked out.
Islam4life2010 4 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Islam4life2010 Jazak Allah
sipraomer 4 weeks ago
Sultan Baybars was a ADIGA(Circassian)!!ADIGA FOR EVER!!!
shhwalla 1 month ago
I understand that the Mamluks played a large role in pushing back Hulagu's army, but you should have also mentioned Berke Khan who also played a major role in this conflict. For instance, as a recent convert to Islam he re-united the Golden Horde and waged war on Hulagu. Also the last picture is not baybars, its Sultan Mehmet II at the gates of the newly conquered Constantinople.
tigerrc221 1 month ago
@tigerrc221 unfortunately i dont have a collection of pictures....but i will be re-doing the clip....thankyou
Islam4life2010 1 month ago
The Mongols made up for it, they converted to Islam, that is more important than any materialistic entity on this planet. Muslims don't care what destruction they caused, what's important for them is that God led them to the straight path. Mashallah.
tigerrc221 1 month ago
knights Templar bastards the mongols rebuilt all the mosques they damaged and became Muslim in the end Berke khan
KASHMIRI7864LYFE 1 month ago
Indeed God always beside us.No matter how powerful,ruthless and invincibale our enemies we always prevail it s his promise to his nation
Jamila0502 1 month ago
I think we can all agree however that the Battle of Ain Jalut was a moment of great pride for Islam and for Muslims. Ain Jalut was a battle almost as pivotal as those at Karbala, and the Badr. Ain Jalut was the Tours of the Islamic world, when Muslims united under a common banner to challenge the Unstoppable Mongol War Machine. Ain Jalut is where we made our stand, and where we held them at bay while the "mighty" Western kingdoms were clambering and kneeling at the feet of Hulagu.
Killzoneguy117 1 month ago
@Killzoneguy117 the "Mighty western kingdoms" were not "kneeling at the feet of Hulegu," unless you count "the west" as "west" of the Mongolian steppes, and thusly Mawarenahr, Khurasan, and the Azerbaijan areas. And as far as Ain Jalut being "the Tours of the Islamic world," you should take into account the fact that the battle was more about the Mongol's small force and lack of tactical command. It had nothing to do with ideology.
prinznevsky 1 month ago
@Killzoneguy117 Christians and Muslims to this day like to shape the whole historical narrative to their liking when it comes to the Mongols and religion. Most historians agree that it was not a defining factor in Mongol policy. The Mongols didn't care what your religion was, as long as you submitted to the Khagan. Remember, many Muslims in Iran were happy at the destruction of their Ismai'li coreligionists, and many Muslims volunteered to help them (Rashid al Din?).
prinznevsky 1 month ago
@Killzoneguy117 What was at stake was in fact the nascent post-Ayyubid Mameluk dynasty. The stability of the Cairene sultans was tenuous at best, and after the sack of Baghdad, there was a power vacuum that left the early Mameluks in the position of supremacy in the region. They adopted the Abbasid princes as part of their retinue, if only to achieve legitimacy. Ain Jalut paved the way for Baybars, and far from "uniting" Muslims, it helped to reignite the Sunni/Shia schism.
prinznevsky 1 month ago
This is complete propaganda. The fact is, the Crusaders kicked the shit out of the muslims the vast majority of the time even though the crusaders were vastly outnumbered. Saladin himself was beaten first by the 16 year old king Baldwin and then on 3 separate occasions by King Richard the Lion heart.
AegeanKing 2 months ago
@AegeanKing
Quit watching Hollywood fictions and go read some history .Baybars the great general kicked the shit out of both the Mongols and Crusaders.
Jamila0502 2 months ago
The battles of Ayn Jalut September 1260 against Mongols AD,Hattin July 1187 against crusaders both are recoreded and mentioned in history.No fiction here
Jamila0502 2 months ago
@AegeanKing
Baibars or Baybarsal-Malik al-Zahir Rukn al-Din Baibars, nicknamed Abu l-Futuh[1] (Arabic: أبو الفتوح) (1223 July 1, 1277, Damascus), was a Mamluk Sultan of Egypt. He was one of the commanders of the forces which inflicted a devastating defeat on the Seventh Crusade of King Louis IX of France and he led the vanguard of the Egyptian army at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260,[2] which marked the first substantial defeat of the Mongol army and is considered a turning point in history.
Jamila0502 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
according to google .
Jamila0502 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
ibn el alkami was killed by Kublai.He told him before killing him you betrayed your people you are going to betray me
Jamila0502 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@Jamila0502 thats exactly right....but in 3 minutes I wasnt able to include all details :-)
Islam4life2010 2 months ago
There is a big historical inaccuracy in this video. The Mongols were led by Kitbuqa (a Nestorian christian), a general of Hulagu since Hulagu had left the Levant with most of his forces in order to attend the Khuriltai.
Janmejaya9 3 months ago
@Janmejaya9 and which history are you reading?? The Islamic, western or oriental one? My sources are Islamic....any perspective other than that does not interest me in the slightest,
Islam4life2010 3 months ago
@Islam4life2010 Can you cite your Islamic sources? My sources are both the Mongol and Islamic writings which themselves have been confirmed by Western scholars. The accounts of Fatimid Egypt themselves say that it was Kitbuqa Noyan who led the Mongol armies and not Hulagu. Hulagu did try to attack egypt post ain-jalut but was always occupied by pre-emptive attacks from the Golden Horde.
Janmejaya9 3 months ago
@Janmejaya9 can you read Arabic? Hulagu was defeated fair and square by Baybars post Ayn Jalut....full stop!
Islam4life2010 3 months ago
@Islam4life2010 Sorry I don't know Arabic but different historical accounts do confirm that there never was a direct confrontation between Baybars and Hulagu.And yes Baybars did defeat the Mongol army at Ain-Jalut but the Mongol commander was Kitbuqa and not Hulagu. That is full stop for all the avid followers of history.
Janmejaya9 3 months ago
@Janmejaya9 there are several accounts of the muslim-mongol clash...irrespective of the angle we take...history does support the view that the mameluks were victorious over the mongols after the victory of Ayn Jalut......yes..the mongols did become divided after this period...but thats history for you...no particular dynasty can remain united forever and eventually the victorious becomes defeated and the defeated in turn becomes victorious....
Islam4life2010 3 months ago
@Janmejaya9 Besides,I do not take the Fatmid account as historical in anyway...besides, the fatmids were not around during the mongol invasion since we know that Saladin rid Egypt of them heretics!
Islam4life2010 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
soon islam will rise up again and we will do the same to america and its allies what we did to mongols and its allies...defeat is on its way america...
gstreetboi 4 months ago
"Sultan Baybars refuses and sends their heads back to Kublai" - What a moment.
Those were the days, Subhanallah, when people trully did live Islam.
Perseveranze 7 months ago