Added: 4 years ago
From: ralphg63
Views: 4,731
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Brings back memories.

  • Yeah, I think both Lincoln and Packard had the better models in 1956

  • A gorgeous car. The engine sounds beautiful as well. Sorry Cadillac, but the 1956 Coupe de Ville could only dream of looking as pretty as the 1956 Packard 400.

  • I love my 56 Patrician! Thanks for a nice video of a nice car. Mine is in the early stages of restoration, but is registered and road worthy. It is a huge hit at local cruise nights and car shows!

  • Great looking car. I wonder if Packard wouldn't have been better off if they had stayed independent and hadn't been merging with Studebaker just as they were getting the 55's ready to introduce.

  • Ask The Man Who Owns One -

  • ......gorgeous....simply gorgeous. They (55/56's) are rounded, but straight. Not a dowdy early 50's look, but not a rocketship on wheels like most cars looked by 58. The 56 is also a better car mechanically.I have a 55, same color as this one, but I like the full length stainless strip on yours (I considered locating the 56 trim and applying it to mine at one point, but did not.)

  • The 1956 Packard was one of the best looking cars of the Fifties. It has the best blend of flashiness and reserve. Outstanding innovations, too.

  • Comment removed

  • Wow, there will never be a brand Like Packard again! Great car you got there ....

  • Still and elegant car. Delorean was at packard and moved to pontiac after 56 look at the early grand prix.

    55-56 packard suspension was the best still is. motor trend did a retrospective on linc, cad pack and imperial.packard got handling cudos over all of them.

  • Ralphg63--congrats on a beautiful Carribbean HT. I have a '56 400 HT. See my videos here on youtube--I service the electronic pushbuttons

  • ralph took the video of me driving the caribbean.I'm the owner

  • Oh baby...

  • so you liked the car huh ?

    she's a beauty

  • Yes,she is...I was noticing at other Packard videos(this one too)that 56 Packards look a lot like the "redesigned" 57 Mercurys(being Fords with style and class was Mercurys original mission)And that other Packards looked a lot like 57/58 Buicks.

  • Well... I think they stand alone, and 56 was the last true Packard, the 57 Packard was a merge with Studebaker, and was disasterous in design. This is a Caribbean hardtop, rare, most were convertibles.

  • Yes,they do stand alone.Didn't know 56/57 were their last years.Did they become the Packard in PackardBell?

  • Taranau-look at a 1955 Lincoln vs. a '55 Packard, then look at a '56 Lincoln vs. '56 Packard and see who looks like who. It's easy to say a Packard "looks like X", but in the case of your example here the Packard is compared to a car that came out a full calender year later, in which case that car looks like a Packard. But, it's a GM-Ford-Chrysler world out there and no one can fathom an independant actually doing something well, or being unique

  • Have long been cognizant of car companies and their tendencies to feed off each other.And the activity of similar situations/similar results.How about that Packard Predictor?It took Pontiacs a while to get that look.Having never owned one,and not knowing how well or not they were made,Sudebaker Avantis possess a uniqueness.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more