Climate Code Green Campaign - the impact of Climate Change on health (amsa.org.au/climate)

[robreiken]

Heres some facts Carbon today 387 Parts Per Million Crustacious Period it was 10,000 PPM , it don't become a prob to us till around 8,000 PPM , ideal level is 2,000 PPM so therefore we need 6 times more carbon not less. It is plant food & any volcanoes going of can spew out more carbon in a day than all countries in a year so think about that. Why is this lie pushed, cause the gov want to tax it to Con U steal your money make you broke ,economic collapse for a Global World Government Takeover.

[AFCrory]

@robreiken I feel sorry for you. You're so uninformed about the serious subject of Climate Change. In the Cretaceous (That is the correct spelling) Period, the Carbon PPM rate was at around 1700 PPM and at the most 2,000 PPM. The ideal PPM rate is around 350, not 2,000.

Please try and find the correct facts, rather than facts that just seem correct.

[robreiken]

@AFCrory I do admit i took some info on face value without looking into it that you appear right bout most of what your sayin'. That 10thou ppm is more like 7,000 PPM Cambrian Period, so which has now got me looking into it more thoroughly. But the main thing i will never accept is the agenda of lies the gov push for man made climate change being real while they poison this world in so many ways. ETS Credits is for Globalists not us peasants, all lies to con us into their Genocide 4 NWO.

[robreiken]

@AFCrory Also i do understand man can't stop climate change , we are carbon based life forms & would die without it.Bees which Gov refuses to remove 2 poisons killing them. They Chemtrail us with Barium put GMO poison in our foods, Fluoride in Water,Squalene & Mercury in Vaccines,deny many cures to cancer, deny us cold fusion free zero energy & cars running on water, they selling of our land n business to foreigners, privatising water n power, these r the things what i mostly look into.

[robreiken]

Be more fooking direct about it will ya people are a filthy cancer upon the earth, so must murder most of the people under the plan called Agenda 21 Sustainable Development Depopulation Genocide, 90% to be killed as it is states on The American Stonehenge (Georgia Guidstones) Maintain Humanity under 500 million, go & google it , it's a real monument . THis is what you really are saying. So any volunteers then, who is willing to die for it, come on anyone, suicide for the greenies.

[mtukaki]

MostlyAutomotive - let me be clear as someone who has led Australia's oldest and largest employment corporation. The first reality is, business is responding because it makes business sense to be more sustainable and manage our footprint on the environment. This has nothing to do with the science debate or discussion - it has to do with commonsense business practice. Secondly, read the recently published NOAA report, a collaboration of more than 400 scientists around the world. They agree.

[mtukaki]

Second reality: have you been outside of the place or area you live? Travel to the islands of the Pacific and the Indian Ocean, the islands of the Torres Strait between Australia and PNG - witness first hand the impact of rising sea levels. Look at the increasing numbers of droughts (long term) - look at the increasing ferocity of changing weather patterns. This is not about the science anymore - it is about what is happening.

[MostlyAutomotive48]

Also, you must remember that numbers will not win an argument, facts will, and as far as I'm concerned, you've yet to prove this. (answer my question you ignored in my first post)

[MsFinn81]

MostlyAutomotive48: If 9 out of 10 doctors told you you had cancer that could be cured if immediate action was taken, would you believe them and take action? Or would you sit back and let the cancer destroy you?

[MostlyAutomotive48]

@MsFinn81 Your analogy leaves out many key factors in determining an answer. The "scientists" who tell you AGW is happening are paid by the government in order to forward their agenda and continue carbon taxing. Also, the media is the meat in the sandwich as they broadcast the scientists reports through dead journalism. In the end, we get a story, and that's about it. Your gullibility toward it is exactly what they want as it drives their agenda and keeps the money rolling in. $ > truth.

[MostlyAutomotive48]

I feel bad for all the people who were actually gullible enough to swallow all this media propaganda. The simple fact of the matter is, climate change is has yet be proven our fault. Why?

Answer this question for me: When was proven (or shown fact) that our contribution was having an impact whilst distinguishing it from all other contributing factors? Your whole theory lies on this question alone, and so far, no one who I've asked (that believes in AGW) has been able to answer it.

[frejawho]

fantastic video, already totally viral on facebook but WHAT IS THAT PIECE OF MUSIC? It's doing my head in!

[RoundupResistance]

When it comes to climate change, EVERYONE is a potential victim!

That would include emergency services, farmers, the elderly and so on.

Many of us are ill-informed and ill-prepared (and being kept that way) for climate change too...

The only place climate refugees should go to is Russia, the largest country in the world.

[fatalmystic]

@bens0035 in fact ... EVERYBODY go for it! ... things you might find interesting are ecoheroes and maplight ... we'll win ;)

[ice224]

This is awesome! Thumbs up for u! =)

[JamesChanUK]

@gotovo - stop denying, and get a grip. The evidence is real, and there's stronger evidence for man-made climate change than much of the evidence that doctors use for deciding which treatment to prescribe to patients. It was people like you who wanted to appease the Nazis in the 30s and thought that we'd have to go to war.

Shame on you.

[gotovo]

google climategate

[YoungSam992]

@gotovo You'll notice that the scientists were in fact acquitted, and that their findings were found to be 'correct' insofar as to say that there was no falsifying or hiding of the data...

wiki (sure, not 100% reliable, but it references) says "Reports by the House of Commons' Science and Technology Select Committee and an independent Science Assessment Panel commissioned by the UEA concluded that there was no evidence of malpractice on the part of the CRU and Phil Jones"

[YouthUnemployed]

wow that is one amazing video.

[JakekamaCake]

Excellent video, a really useful tool to help spread the word!

[safeclimatesa]

Brilliant! thanks for putting this together. Should be shown in Dr's surgeries across the country

[rossrt]

Amazing video!