OMG!!! I was at this concert!!!! It was all French, starting with The Sorceror's Apprentice and ending with the Fauré Requiem. The same week Michelangeli played a recital of three Beethoven Sonatas and a book of Debussy Preludes. A week to cherish!
what an arrogant ass this celibidache, shooshing the violins like that in a concert. this man was insane. listen to a youtube of him conducting Faure's Libera Me from the Requiem. and he does nothing but bad mouth all other conductors. totally overrated. i have little respect for most conductors, and this is becoming the norm opinion these days.
"Not prepared" might have been part of it, though it all depends on whom you compare Celi with. However, his not being German enough was rather the likely reason.
To me, the danger in this movement is that the piano may start to sound like a sewing machine. Sometimes it's better to slow down a bit at the beginning, to give oneself somewhere to go, so to speak.
Ravel is very interesting in this one, there isn't very much of a main motiff that develops itself or rhythmic devices that build upon themselves, very much of a sentimental kind of satirical joke, a refreshingly optimistic way of not taking things too seriously.
I have owned his recording of this with the Rach No. 4 on the other side since my Conservatory days. Such perfect pianism and musicianship should be a joy to everyone.
Its nice to see so many people like classical music.
Just to let you know, there is a site out there that offers a great variety of classical music:
M O N T E V E R D I dot T V.
They do a lot of other great things. Like THIS SUNDAY, there is a FREE LIVE BROADCAST of a piano concert by famous cuban pianoplayer JORGE LUIS PRATS.
great!... I have this record... lol look at 1:18 the clarinetist is like " Is this thing on?" I play Clarinet and piano.... so its rather shameful from the clarinet side of things but wonderful piano playing!
man, michelangeli makes playing piano look as easy as making a sandwich. just put your hands on the white and black thingys and thats it, but boy, this is so f**** hard to play, it's not even funny
It's still under copyright, so you won't be able to find it online for free (legally, anyway). The only edition I've ever seen is the Durand one edited by Lucien Garban; I got my copy from sheetmusicplus.
But yeah, he's so dead, and he's definitely not watching over us or something insane, but getting his music illegally is stealing in the exact sense of the word. Someone owns the rights to his music and if you love Ravel's music you should WANT to buy it.
Yeah, probably some cigar-chomper owns the rights, since Ravel didn't have any kids. On a more serious note, it's certainly a good thing to have the music for free online. People should figure out how to alter the business and rearrange employments in order to make money again. Just kidding, I don't have the answer to that problem
at least the music IS free, 70 years after composers dead (Ravel died 1937).
Maybe, that pianist (dead as well) conducter (who did nearly no official music productions - dead like the others) or any guy in the orchestra has any rights in the production.
But as well it's really nice, to be able to share this divine music with this divine artist. thanks by the way.
well [starts to become offtopic]- I think, Kurtyoungblood's not so wrong: nobody can pay what's "worth" a composition like this or a performance. So what we pay for a recording helps, to give musicians and artists what they deserve and can go on working great stuff. What's maybe more important for the lots and lots which are not superstars - but even they: shall get paid well, if they do good for us, don't they?
But - it's good as well, that one day stops that necessarity...
possibly but how does someone value 'worth' certainly not the composer or musician,it is probably some financial pen-pusher in his office creaming off the profits and giving the artists a token payment
also if a music-lover has'nt the means to buy a said performance why have'nt they the right as much as a wealthier individula ie dignitaries who get the best seats in the house even though they may not particularly want to be there?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Very different. Michelangeli was a tad too perfect for impressionist rep. I hear EVERY single note. It was a bit painful in the beginning. I like notes geting a bit glossed over.
He does some glissandi with a finger which would be easier than fingering it as a scale. The score says glissando but rest assured he could finger the same notes and we'd be none the wiser.
As I said.....a weak smart-ass joke on my part.
Have you checked out Michelangeli playing Scarlatti ?
This is the first time I've ever heard Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and I guess it is unfortunate that I heard him play this after hearing Martha Argerich play it several times. After her, I thought his playing of this concerto is very bland and uninteresting.
She once studied under him. Maybe he taught her too well. Or maybe I've got a tin ear.
Whatever anyone considers best, consider this: Whether Michelangeli was an aristoctrat or not, he played as if he were. He led by example, (He couldn't make it easier for the conductor), didn't show off, was in perfect control of himself, sensitive and didn't show any flaws. All this at a time when the old school were by todays standards a bit rough and ready, this is unique. Who cares who is better? Michelangeli is always worth a listen, you don't get what he gave every day.
Indeed, you won't find more confident playing and posture than this guy; no matter who you prefer, that is a great way to put it: "Michelangeli is always worth a listen, you don't get what he gave every day"
Every recording is of a consistant quality hat is just, magical. And I love that his way of playing reflects that. No extranious movements, just a look of complete control. And those hands... I have never seen hands move the way Mochelangeli's do.
Some people favor the Agerich version, but Michelangeli's original recording for Angel from 1958 with Ettore Gracis conducting is THE reference recording for performers wishing to get inside of this work. The second movement in particular is unparalleled on that recording.
il est clair qu'ici, pour le 1er mvt, Ravel a ete influence par Gershwin, d'ailleurs, ils se sont rencontres mais il est interessant de constater comment Ravel a reussi a integre le jazz dans son propre langage
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bahhh..........he was (fortunately WAS) a complete bluff. The real GREAT here is Benedetti Michelangelli.
Look at the hands of celibedache, all opposite contrary movements in his arms. Not a single amount of independence.. He just was a myth.. he lools as a band conductor.
Though it is a bit showy and sacrifices sincerity for wit, I prefer the tempo and attitude of the '55 version with Michelangeli. This here seems tired and worn.
Even though most American orchestras have used C-trumpets for 30 or so years, British orchestras very rarely use anything but Bb's (even on pieces like this where a C-trumpet makes things much easier!)
I'd like to thank "twotea22" for posting this amazing recording of the Ravel Concerto from arguably the best interpreter of Ravel and Debussy there ever was. Michelangeli's repertoire was limited, and his performances infrequent, compared to others of his time such as Richter, but it is clear that his playing was exquisite (at worst), and there is never a single wrong note. Absolute perfection.
Well put. Although I actually have a recording of him playing the Emperor with Celibidache where he clobbers a wrong note. Worth it just for that. Might be the only one he ever made.
Do check it out, but do so for Celibidache, not the wrong note. Celibidache said something to the effect that when he listens to Michelangeli play, he is glad that he gave up the piano. One genius appreciating another.
Is anybody aware of a recording of Celi with Richter? I read somewhere about their collaborating, but I've never come across any recording.
The Emperor I'd really like to hear is Neuhaus'. Richter felt Neuhaus' interpretation was definitive so he never performed the work.
So Gershwin owes some debt to Ravel? Wasn't there a tale about him visiting Ravel to "learn about something"? And Ravel, with modesty, demurred, "No, I would probably learn more from you." Great performance, great video. Thanks
Yes, I think Gershwin went to Ravel for some lessons in composition or theory or something, and Ravel was like "well how 'bout YOU give ME some lessons..."
Wikipedia tells the story that when Gershwin asked Ravel for advice he, Ravel, asked "Why be a second rate Ravel when you could be a first rate Gershwin?"
Right at 7:00 the RH trills sound like a "thermon" (wrong spelling, the strange "sound effect" often used in sci-fi movies. On the studio recording he made, coupled with the Rachmaninov 4th Piano Concerto, the sound is so smooth there, it is truly spooky!
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved. ...i just dont like to run the risk
believe it or not i was present at this concert in london nearly twenty five years ago- i was deeply moved seeing it again. michelangeli was unique to see live- what a stage presence! absolutely unforgettable
I am used to it, and that is the only reason I except it the way it is. But I think Bernstein's interpretation is far better, and so is Margaret Long's.
Actually Richter said it about Beethoven's Emperor referring to Gilels(just a correction) :) He did not even like Michelangeli's playing most of the time.
lol, i'm sorry i'm such an ass, but I came here only for the trumpet solo.
MELOVESTHETRUMPET 1 month ago
Superb! TY t for posting
paulostroff99 5 months ago
The same concert in HD: /watch?v=-JAeUjg4zj8&hd=1
stoklund 5 months ago
@stoklund THX!!!
Resonance86 4 months ago
@stoklund Brilliant
spasman 1 month ago
no cabe la menor duda de que es el mejor compositor del piano impresionista
burmecia11 5 months ago
superrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheSnso 6 months ago
Haha at 6:00 minutes, Sergio Celibidache's face was the same as mine. "AAaawweeesommeee."
OlmoLane 6 months ago
Is he trilling on three fingers at about 6:50?
MRDRWWILLIAMS 7 months ago
I have never heard anybody play this piece like that. Was this piece written especially for him? It sounds like it Whow!!!
leebee36296 8 months ago in playlist music favorites 4
There's no such thing as perfect in art, but there is no other way of explaining this but perfection
hannahbyun94 9 months ago 5
OMG!!! I was at this concert!!!! It was all French, starting with The Sorceror's Apprentice and ending with the Fauré Requiem. The same week Michelangeli played a recital of three Beethoven Sonatas and a book of Debussy Preludes. A week to cherish!
beetsee4 11 months ago 5
15 people are totally nuts...
RoyantV 11 months ago 2
Precision, Clarity.
Excellent
Pavlvs34 11 months ago
Celibidache has a wonderfully warm and charismatic face...full of erudition!
thisismymoniker 1 year ago
horrible arrangement!! :(
dandelion902 1 year ago
What a shame about the very poor sound quality...
Kurremkarmerruk1 1 year ago
there can be only 1 explaination, he is using real-life hacks
DJNotNais 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
can u send me the piano sheet please??hehe.happy_line_4@hotmail.com.thx
darknesstrick 1 year ago
Sensational.IMHO it has never been played better on record. TY.
paulostroff99 1 year ago 2
@paulostroff99
Thanks and I feel ABM was special here. Thank you twotea22 for posting.
John
65attila 1 year ago
Which orchestra is this?
ALBIBISBIS 1 year ago
@ALBIBISBIS London Symphony I think, says so at the start of the video
gmhots 1 year ago
Way too cold.
mountainharry 1 year ago
@mountainharry sorry?
theanswer00 1 year ago
Michelangeli sembra danzare sulla tastiera
xstelladanzante 1 year ago
Creepy and great. The Lord Tomboy cut is pretty bad. She needs a massage.
naumandolphin 1 year ago
Ravel non poteva desiderare interpreti migliori...
ViolaS783 1 year ago
Why is the trumpet player playing on a B-flat trumpet. well the trumpet player and of course the pianist sound great
Quezacotl77 1 year ago
the allegramente is the sound of going mad
drongovids 1 year ago
vravissimo!! I love this performance. very enjoy,thank you.
Crodia1755 1 year ago
Yes, but a tradition is now forgotton
SyriaMosque 1 year ago
this concerto is so amazing that can't be expressed with words
umeTree 1 year ago
his icy cool tone is perfect for ravel. The Ultimate Ravel concerto ever!!
klavierflame 1 year ago 2
michelangeli: pianists' pianist.
klavierflame 1 year ago 2
sounds like something copland would have written
cirosuperiore 1 year ago
Three finger trills as always. What a musician.
Haeronthegreat 1 year ago 3
Those glissandos at the beginning of the piece are done with such ease... Michelangeli had amazing control.
chickenmonger 1 year ago 3
I saw these guys play at the gay parade in san francisco in 2004. they were ok, but erasure stole the show - theyre the best!
flyingape11 1 year ago
@flyingape11 You saw the London Symphony play a parade? Wow. That must have been exhausting.
bassman30000 1 year ago
@bassman30000
Wish i was there!
brassmonkeyjew 1 year ago
May be one of the best concerto for piano and orchestra. Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and Sergiu Celibidache are among the best
of all time
123must 1 year ago 3
no feelings, no emotions...
misspeckpeck 1 year ago
Comment removed
asta62 1 year ago
Wonderful performance by Michelangeli!!!!!
196327005 1 year ago
Michelangeli la lleva!
javierespinos 1 year ago
best Cadenza ever @ 6:30
tachyon17011701 2 years ago 4
When he looked at the camera at 5:20 I could have sworn that was Vito Corleone.
34f2u1to 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhaha yes don vito :)
1LUPENZO 2 years ago
No pianist has ever performed this work as splendidly as Michelangeli!
rumpwrestler 2 years ago 54
Marta Argerich. Look it up.
Dread098 1 year ago
@Dread098 Marta Argerich? She's excellent, one of the best... She was a pupil of Michelangeli, you know...
Muzicole 1 year ago 3
@rumpwrestler You'r totally right, mate!
bloodymary61 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the english english-horn player looks like a water born creature
davisbone 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He looks like Snoopy.
bassman30000 2 years ago
@davisbone I was going to say swamp monster!!!
jmarquar 2 years ago
Michelangeli is the best pianist in this work !
Bobby3960 2 years ago 41
@Bobby3960
I think he is the best in all works! :)
ilpianista89 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
yes, is german! he was born in Neuenschweigenhoenzoellernsteinburgstadt
2octavian 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol xD
MetGriller 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Abbado is German?
cicerone63 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what an arrogant ass this celibidache, shooshing the violins like that in a concert. this man was insane. listen to a youtube of him conducting Faure's Libera Me from the Requiem. and he does nothing but bad mouth all other conductors. totally overrated. i have little respect for most conductors, and this is becoming the norm opinion these days.
organboi 2 years ago
yuck yuck yuck. that trumpet player just RUSHED like a bat of hell. i'm outta here.
organboi 2 years ago
LOL! You just said it as if you were literally stepping out of the concert hall
mrpossibilities 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
why the period of Celibidache to the direction of Berliner was so short? He was considered not enough prepared?
cicerone63 2 years ago
why the period of Celibidache to the direction of Berliner was so short? He was considered not enough prepared?
cicerone63 2 years ago
"Not prepared" might have been part of it, though it all depends on whom you compare Celi with. However, his not being German enough was rather the likely reason.
peromaneste 2 years ago
OMG! Michelangeli and Celi TOGETHER! Thank you for posting!
ludowicovan 2 years ago
It's interesting to hear how Ravel incorporated jazz into his already unique style. This is, without a doubt, a milestone in 20th century music.
davidjb100 2 years ago 2
To me, the danger in this movement is that the piano may start to sound like a sewing machine. Sometimes it's better to slow down a bit at the beginning, to give oneself somewhere to go, so to speak.
daniel15671 2 years ago
J'adore l'acoustique du Royal Festival Hall.
Bobby3960 2 years ago
moi non il ya beaucoup trop de réverb
et en plus l'enregistrement sur bande rend le son "acide".
nonogilb 2 years ago
N.1
frederickfrederikfre 2 years ago
A bit jazzy 3:43... I like it.
Bobby3960 2 years ago
No, the tempo is the tempo wanted by Ravel.
Bobby3960 2 years ago
A true legend...his perfection is almost fictionary
martinakias 2 years ago
exceptional performance
he needs a du-rag to go along with that mullet
mdoub 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Indeed! Just GET ON WITH IT. A most irritating performance, missing the spirit by miles. No Gershwin cakewalks here...
chamade16 2 years ago
gli ho inseganto tutto io...
minovlad 2 years ago
what precision technique
mcnardo 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Michelangelli one of greatest pianists of all times.
Here h`played like GOD.
And the Celibedache BLUFF conducted as always did. He looks like if he is doing first sight reading.
Why Michelangelli accept to be conducted by that pig?.
lokopiano
lokopiano 2 years ago
Look at that incredible effortless technique.
It belongs to any different world.......
Amazing..........¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
lokopiano
lokopiano 2 years ago 3
Ravel is very interesting in this one, there isn't very much of a main motiff that develops itself or rhythmic devices that build upon themselves, very much of a sentimental kind of satirical joke, a refreshingly optimistic way of not taking things too seriously.
Lukecash12 2 years ago
I have owned his recording of this with the Rach No. 4 on the other side since my Conservatory days. Such perfect pianism and musicianship should be a joy to everyone.
oktalp 3 years ago 3
The Ravel on CD you mentioned is another recording difference from this, but fatanstic as well.
johnson02010 2 years ago
man this shit blows my mind
hodgins 3 years ago
...do you have one,mind i mean, or do you have only shit in your brain.and so shit comes to shit,that´s pretty nice;)))
kajohada 3 years ago 3
It's interesting how such a boring visual spectacle can yield one of the best recordings of this piece.
coasterman16 3 years ago 3
What a superb performance, truly one of my favourites. The Cadenza is absolutely sublime, and possibly the smoothest trills I've ever heard. :)
MattHartTuks 3 years ago 2
i never saw and heard any pianist playing this concerto as divinely as arturo benedetti michelangeli,it´s really wonderful! :-)
kajohada 3 years ago 4
BRAVO !!! The way Celibidache conduct it's like drawing many butterflies in the air XD
4evaFanFuruba 3 years ago 4
Its nice to see so many people like classical music.
Just to let you know, there is a site out there that offers a great variety of classical music:
M O N T E V E R D I dot T V.
They do a lot of other great things. Like THIS SUNDAY, there is a FREE LIVE BROADCAST of a piano concert by famous cuban pianoplayer JORGE LUIS PRATS.
Just go check it out ;)
Thansferium 3 years ago 2
Lo mejor
RODRIMAZ1847 3 years ago
This is one of the best performances of this concerto!
Bravissimo Michelangeli!!
natsu423 3 years ago 4
great!... I have this record... lol look at 1:18 the clarinetist is like " Is this thing on?" I play Clarinet and piano.... so its rather shameful from the clarinet side of things but wonderful piano playing!
parkourjordz 3 years ago
Great performance!
veseli601 3 years ago
This is great! GO RAVEL!
Disasterpiece03 3 years ago 2
u dun get any better than michelangeli when it comes to this concerto
vietxTonny 3 years ago 2
he's so amazing...and big hands ! this concerto is truly beautiful..
4evaFanFuruba 3 years ago
Perfect ending, thank you Celibidache.
Svaple 3 years ago
Osservate le mani del maestro Michelangeli!!!
Mascagnano 3 years ago
man, michelangeli makes playing piano look as easy as making a sandwich. just put your hands on the white and black thingys and thats it, but boy, this is so f**** hard to play, it's not even funny
neme5151 3 years ago
does anyone knows where can i find this full piano concerto score in internet??? with a good edition??? pleaaseeeee help!!
honeypianist 3 years ago
It's still under copyright, so you won't be able to find it online for free (legally, anyway). The only edition I've ever seen is the Durand one edited by Lucien Garban; I got my copy from sheetmusicplus.
pianoista 3 years ago
If you like the music than you should do Ravel a service by BUYING it.
Kurtyoungblood 3 years ago
He's dead.
GreggaryPeccary 3 years ago
:) No he isn't - I can hear him right now.
But yeah, he's so dead, and he's definitely not watching over us or something insane, but getting his music illegally is stealing in the exact sense of the word. Someone owns the rights to his music and if you love Ravel's music you should WANT to buy it.
Kurtyoungblood 3 years ago
Yeah, probably some cigar-chomper owns the rights, since Ravel didn't have any kids. On a more serious note, it's certainly a good thing to have the music for free online. People should figure out how to alter the business and rearrange employments in order to make money again. Just kidding, I don't have the answer to that problem
GreggaryPeccary 3 years ago 2
at least the music IS free, 70 years after composers dead (Ravel died 1937).
Maybe, that pianist (dead as well) conducter (who did nearly no official music productions - dead like the others) or any guy in the orchestra has any rights in the production.
But as well it's really nice, to be able to share this divine music with this divine artist. thanks by the way.
musiplusi 3 years ago 5
yup, whilst i am watching this the electric on my pc costs me money,michelangeli got paid,ravel got paid,this is only a RECORDING not real
afertyus1000 3 years ago
well [starts to become offtopic]- I think, Kurtyoungblood's not so wrong: nobody can pay what's "worth" a composition like this or a performance. So what we pay for a recording helps, to give musicians and artists what they deserve and can go on working great stuff. What's maybe more important for the lots and lots which are not superstars - but even they: shall get paid well, if they do good for us, don't they?
But - it's good as well, that one day stops that necessarity...
musiplusi 3 years ago
possibly but how does someone value 'worth' certainly not the composer or musician,it is probably some financial pen-pusher in his office creaming off the profits and giving the artists a token payment
also if a music-lover has'nt the means to buy a said performance why have'nt they the right as much as a wealthier individula ie dignitaries who get the best seats in the house even though they may not particularly want to be there?
afertyus1000 3 years ago
Well, I think he cares about us appreciating it more than money because he's in heaven. :)
Sinfoniette 3 years ago
Beautiful. This first movement is so amusing ! (Five stars)
Isidroprada 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Very different. Michelangeli was a tad too perfect for impressionist rep. I hear EVERY single note. It was a bit painful in the beginning. I like notes geting a bit glossed over.
aldebussy 3 years ago
I don't think this is really impressionist. Michelangeli was a technical wiz- perfect for this, imho. :)
sakonhon 3 years ago
I know what you mean. Its almost like he's mocking impressionistic rep by even performing it.
ashleyohtori 3 years ago
the hell is michelangeli doin' with that heinous hair???
but very nice playing though!
DaKrazedKyubizt 3 years ago
That is a piano.
boomzxz 3 years ago
Best performance of the Ravel I have ever heard!
Saxopwnerer 3 years ago
Deux génies ensemble!!!!!!
clymnestre 3 years ago
Unbelievable.
At thirty seconds there is the most blatant cheating I've ever seen on a concert platform.
Didn't it occur to him that the cameras might pick it up?
JohnnyKapsberger 3 years ago
Cheating??? Can you explain?
jakegauthier 3 years ago
Hi Jake......I was making a lame joke.
He does some glissandi with a finger which would be easier than fingering it as a scale. The score says glissando but rest assured he could finger the same notes and we'd be none the wiser.
As I said.....a weak smart-ass joke on my part.
Have you checked out Michelangeli playing Scarlatti ?
Johnny.
FredDrindowicz 3 years ago
Trust me, glissando sounds much different to a scale, even from Michaelangeli...
Haeronthegreat 3 years ago
This is the first time I've ever heard Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and I guess it is unfortunate that I heard him play this after hearing Martha Argerich play it several times. After her, I thought his playing of this concerto is very bland and uninteresting.
She once studied under him. Maybe he taught her too well. Or maybe I've got a tin ear.
phoxee 3 years ago
I don't think this is a good enough recording to capture Michelangeli properly; the sound is a bit harsh here and even sounds clipped in some areas.
That being said, it could just be your musical taste.
RabidCh 3 years ago
Bravo! One of the greatest pianists of all time! TY.
paulostroff99 3 years ago
Whatever anyone considers best, consider this: Whether Michelangeli was an aristoctrat or not, he played as if he were. He led by example, (He couldn't make it easier for the conductor), didn't show off, was in perfect control of himself, sensitive and didn't show any flaws. All this at a time when the old school were by todays standards a bit rough and ready, this is unique. Who cares who is better? Michelangeli is always worth a listen, you don't get what he gave every day.
nostromissimo 3 years ago 2
Indeed, you won't find more confident playing and posture than this guy; no matter who you prefer, that is a great way to put it: "Michelangeli is always worth a listen, you don't get what he gave every day"
Every recording is of a consistant quality hat is just, magical. And I love that his way of playing reflects that. No extranious movements, just a look of complete control. And those hands... I have never seen hands move the way Mochelangeli's do.
pianodan10 3 years ago 2
Some people favor the Agerich version, but Michelangeli's original recording for Angel from 1958 with Ettore Gracis conducting is THE reference recording for performers wishing to get inside of this work. The second movement in particular is unparalleled on that recording.
dstol62 3 years ago
the best recording and interpretation of this work by far!
jmealonso 3 years ago
Gänsehaut!!
simsa21 3 years ago
I always wondered what they do the 'tsch' sound at the very beginning. Anyone knows?
reonat 3 years ago
They've got two planks of wood hinged together and they smack them together. The technical term is "orchestral whip."
golgicomplex 3 years ago
IMO is the best version i've heard of this concert. Do you know another?
dedal141 3 years ago
I've only heard Michelangeli on disc - it is great to SEE him play. Thanks.
rawjade07 4 years ago
Thanks for this!
exalipoor 4 years ago
Celibidache & Michelangeli together... What a team!
cipciripcirip 4 years ago 2
il est clair qu'ici, pour le 1er mvt, Ravel a ete influence par Gershwin, d'ailleurs, ils se sont rencontres mais il est interessant de constater comment Ravel a reussi a integre le jazz dans son propre langage
minetto2 4 years ago
Here is the world greatest conducter in our time!
HenrikHolck 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bahhh..........he was (fortunately WAS) a complete bluff. The real GREAT here is Benedetti Michelangelli.
Look at the hands of celibedache, all opposite contrary movements in his arms. Not a single amount of independence.. He just was a myth.. he lools as a band conductor.
ytpiano7
ytpiano7 4 years ago
Dude looks just like Chopin... crazy.
MisfitFromReno 4 years ago
Yes - Maybe He is Chopin reincarnate, its sure a possibility, I think!
HenrikHolck 4 years ago
wonderful!!!
mrbuncher 4 years ago
lol, the great cecil licad! Please shut up, it's better ;)
phemt666 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Tempo is rather slow; lacks energy and fire.
It almost put me to sleep. Listen to Cecile Licad play this concerto and you'll feel alive and invigorated.
KevinFromSD 4 years ago
Though it is a bit showy and sacrifices sincerity for wit, I prefer the tempo and attitude of the '55 version with Michelangeli. This here seems tired and worn.
cesar314 4 years ago
this is a perfect performance but i find the tempo a little reserved
matanuskan 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Excellent piece, I found free sheet music for it on SheetMusicFox DOT com and absolutely love it!
thelmaandlouse 4 years ago
Does anyone interested in playing piano?
I practiced "Flight of the bumble bee" for 6 monthes and I am now tired of it, so I just recorded it for fun, lol.
watch?v=Yi3fsLas2gc
tanekim09 4 years ago
Does anyone know why the trumpet player is on a Bb trumpet? I always thought that this was played on a C trumpet.
joe123abc09 4 years ago
Even though most American orchestras have used C-trumpets for 30 or so years, British orchestras very rarely use anything but Bb's (even on pieces like this where a C-trumpet makes things much easier!)
scbaseball214 4 years ago
Fabolous!i wish i could play the piano just like him...
it was the Best Eva...
lauraabaigar 4 years ago
I'd like to thank "twotea22" for posting this amazing recording of the Ravel Concerto from arguably the best interpreter of Ravel and Debussy there ever was. Michelangeli's repertoire was limited, and his performances infrequent, compared to others of his time such as Richter, but it is clear that his playing was exquisite (at worst), and there is never a single wrong note. Absolute perfection.
GreatPianists 4 years ago
Well put. Although I actually have a recording of him playing the Emperor with Celibidache where he clobbers a wrong note. Worth it just for that. Might be the only one he ever made.
44gz 4 years ago
Hmm...the Emperor I have is perfect. I'll have to check that recording out.
It's a pity that whenever pianists miss a note is a "clobbered" note.
GreatPianists 4 years ago
Do check it out, but do so for Celibidache, not the wrong note. Celibidache said something to the effect that when he listens to Michelangeli play, he is glad that he gave up the piano. One genius appreciating another.
Is anybody aware of a recording of Celi with Richter? I read somewhere about their collaborating, but I've never come across any recording.
The Emperor I'd really like to hear is Neuhaus'. Richter felt Neuhaus' interpretation was definitive so he never performed the work.
44gz 4 years ago
watch Patricio Molina
chilean100 4 years ago
Pity the sound wasn't so good! Why?
therealong 4 years ago
So Gershwin owes some debt to Ravel? Wasn't there a tale about him visiting Ravel to "learn about something"? And Ravel, with modesty, demurred, "No, I would probably learn more from you." Great performance, great video. Thanks
sagalat 4 years ago
Yes, I think Gershwin went to Ravel for some lessons in composition or theory or something, and Ravel was like "well how 'bout YOU give ME some lessons..."
GreatPianists 4 years ago
Wikipedia tells the story that when Gershwin asked Ravel for advice he, Ravel, asked "Why be a second rate Ravel when you could be a first rate Gershwin?"
superlativehorse9 4 years ago
Right at 7:00 the RH trills sound like a "thermon" (wrong spelling, the strange "sound effect" often used in sci-fi movies. On the studio recording he made, coupled with the Rachmaninov 4th Piano Concerto, the sound is so smooth there, it is truly spooky!
gaerduane 4 years ago
i love the impressionism:D
uwebassu 4 years ago
wow this is an amazing performance of an amazing piece
matanuskan 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
shawnyskoo 4 years ago
The best concert i've ever seen....Michelangeli has no comparison....
ciga86 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved. ...i just dont like to run the risk
shangtia 5 years ago
Please stop spreading these nonsenses!
BrunoDeBordeaux 4 years ago
My first comment goes to shangtia and all people who keep spreading this stupid message in YouTube. I have long read this and I AM STILL ALIVE.
BrunoDeBordeaux 4 years ago
believe it or not i was present at this concert in london nearly twenty five years ago- i was deeply moved seeing it again. michelangeli was unique to see live- what a stage presence! absolutely unforgettable
adlere 5 years ago
Great conductor Sergiu Celibidache, great Pianist A.Benedetti Michelangeli. Tanks!
otilia46 5 years ago
can you tell me why he waves his hand around 3 minutes. He is nice to watch but what does he mean? was someone coughing?
ramsmenon 5 years ago
I'm used to hear a pretty different version of this piece. That's perhaps why I disagree with all you... Sorry. I'm hure he's good.
LousyPianist 5 years ago
I am used to it, and that is the only reason I except it the way it is. But I think Bernstein's interpretation is far better, and so is Margaret Long's.
PianoProductions 5 years ago
When a journalist ask Ricther why he never play a ravel's concert he said that Michelangeli already do it. Simply the best. bye
tafy1973 5 years ago
Actually Richter said it about Beethoven's Emperor referring to Gilels(just a correction) :) He did not even like Michelangeli's playing most of the time.
edwardkuz 5 years ago