DEBS DOES ADDENDUM

[elsushidelamancha]

that analysis is so weak and biased. good luck to debunk September Clues, I bet you carefully which parts you though would be apparently easier to debunk...but even with those so-called well carefully chosen parts of yours, you simply fail to bring any counter evidence to the now very well documented and established fact that 9/11 was major TV fakery. period.

[checkThrice]

Shack did an amazing job with the planes.

but lost his marbles and is trying to prove now his mom and dad are fake additions too.

[ChristianHolloway7]

I posted this on the video. The res is to crap to capture pat, He removed comment and blocked me. Thanks Eugene for this and FK you Shack you clown.

[losability]

shill

[xxxNiceLifexxx]

maybe some braindead americans will buy that crap

[claudiocastellini]

Explain this: Pat is clearly in FRONT of tower 1 (3:17, 3:56) at the time of COLLAPSE. At 4:01 and 4:21 it should be right where Shack POINTS. And yet you say we can't see Pat because of the smoke ?? That position is almost BEHIND tower 2. You 've placed Pat at two different places at the time of collapse !!

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini Thank you for watching. I am not sure what you are saying when you say that I have placed Pat at two different places. I don't start my rebuttal until the 6th minute. Could you please watch again? If I have made a mistake, I would like to know. Thanks.

[claudiocastellini]

I was perfectly clear. At the time of collapse Pat should be in front of tower 1 as we see in the 3:17 map. You 've shown that at the time of collapse at 6:06 Pat was BEHIND the smoke. Only problem is that this is NOT in front of tower 1 but way back. You 've proved Shack correct.

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini Please watch the sequence from 5:34 and forward thru 6:06. We see that Pat is right where it should be prior to collapse, but as the camera zooms out, Pat becomes *smaller* and seems to disappear. Simon snipped out the early part to mislead people.

[claudiocastellini]

Unbelievable how you twist your own video. Pat doesn't "become smaller" but it's hidden by the SMOKE as it flies to the LEFT. (The camera zooms out AFTER that). This is only possible if Pat is way back and not in front of tower 1 as we see in other shots. It seems the one who debunked his own claim is you. Better luck next time.

[YougeneDebs]

@claudiocastellini If you want to believe that Pat gets hidden by the smoke, then please post a video showing what you believe to be true. Thank you for your interest in my work.

[JZJYRWO]

"God speed" ?? what a way to close, you might have said just be faithful and trust in war mongering politics and propaganda. Why not just say volunteer to have yourself butchered in the Middle East for the value of the dollar is the only thing truly at stake.

[YougeneDebs]

@JZJYRWO So; I debunk another Shack vid, and all you can do is pick on my *sign-off* line?

How's your investigation going? Have you got any proof yet that the Navy grounded all helicopters prior to the attacks on 9/11 ?? No? Didn't think so.

Keep at it; you might find something. Then, you'll get to make a video, and I'll pick on YOUR *sign-off* line.

Sound fair?

kthxbye

[JZJYRWO]

@YougeneDebs To investigate the events properly, we need to ascertain at least one piece of definitive physical evidence, from which we build upon this a theory. The most definite evidence from all of the official broadcasts are the laughable silhouettes in the side of each WTC building. Perhaps the biggest mistake they made was showing us the silhouette shaped hole, they say was left by an aluminum plane in the side of a steel and concrete tower. Have you any inclination of physics?

[YougeneDebs]

@MrKoenig1985 Thanks for your participation!

In Rick's Hoboken footage, "Pat" is Chopper #4.

Or, did I miss-understand your question?

[YougeneDebs]

@MrKoenig1985 What's wrong? Try this: Do you see that red triangle in Rick's footage? It's NOT a helicopter. It's just a marker. Rick *flew* the marker behind the antenna; but watch the helicopter itself. Does that help?

There is an old saying: Do not mistake the finger for the moon.

[YougeneDebs]

@MrKoenig1985 I’m sorry; please forgive me; I didn’t mean to insult you.

I honestly don’t see anything wrong with the flight path of ‘PAT’ the helicopter.

OTOH, you could be on to something.

Therefore, where is the better venue for you to lay out your case?

On youtube? where spaces are needed for a jpeg url?

Or a research forum where you can post your calculations?

I encourage you to start a thread at Pumpitout.

[pzmtuthcvpvl]

jpeg compression artifacts due to DCT coefficient matrix issues when taking the inverse DCT (type-III DCT) results in an image where the heli could so some shape-shifing, not unlike the shifty sales pitch of the Omission Retort.

[AlYassou3Rabbi]

A million people worldwide looking for some reason to impeach George Dubbya, if any of this conspiracy crap was real, old George would be in Levonworth cranking out license plates.

Give me a break, lets put it to rest.

Have you seen Elvis lately, I hear hes still in hiding.

[YougeneDebs]

Put what to rest?

[AlYassou3Rabbi]

Like I said, have you seen Elvis recently? Lets put the 911 conspiracy crap to rest. It wasnt an inside job.

[YougeneDebs]

@AlYassou3Rabbi~

Thanks for clarifying your position!

The terrorist actions on 9/11 looks like a *Reichstag Fire* to me. So I'll keep investigating.

Thanks for stopping by!

[kjvonly01]

Excellent job.

[bastienjack]

a"helicopter" or a"bird"? You have good eyes. What about the "tall man". Reasonable explaination? Tampered footage. Period.

[YougeneDebs]

So, what about the tall man!

Which footage is "tampered"?

Why is Simon Shack lying to you (and everybody else)?

[i5z7]

I have never seen the galileo one before today. Am I a liar ? (It explains a lots about you....)

[YougeneDebs]

Thank you for answering your own question!

I'm here to help!

[stbays]

This proves what I've always known about cameras. An object like a helicopter wouldn't have enough mass to be visiable as the camera pulls back.

Great work!

(btw, someone or some people appear to be going through and thumbing down everyone's comments.)

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for your kind words!

About the 'thumbing down': I've thought about dis-allowing 'thumbs'; what do you think?

[stbays]

Considering how after a person gets -6 thumbs, their comment can no longer be seen by the average viewer, I'd probably turn them off. I do this on my videos, though I also police my comment sections carefully to make sure people are treating each other with some respect and staying relatively on topic (giving ley way where needed).

I don't think turning them off will effect the quality of the video itself and people can still insult each other all they want (or better, comment on the video).

[YougeneDebs]

Thank you for your careful, considered, and prompt reply. That part about having a comment hidden because of too many downthumbs eluded me.

Thanks for your input!

[stbays]

Np, I'm always happy to help out a fellow Youtube video maker. Your videos are far above my own, but I'd like to think I do my part to help.

Sadly, I've had my videos attacked and the comments section ruined by certain people. I can't say for sure, but I'm guessing they're AJ supporters cause I tend to counter what Alex has to say a lot.

I use the no thumbs and I some times force all comments to be approved when the troublemakers come out in full force.

[Weirdo10o4]

Mass?

[stbays]

I'm not sure what your message means. If you can clearify, I'll be more then happy to answer you in a timely and polite manner.

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for watching and the stars!

And your kind words.

[GenghisVault]

You are doing a great work Debs...

[YougeneDebs]

I'm glad you are watching!

Thanks for your kind words.

[webfairy2]

Thank you for all the proof Simon Shack is FAKE.

[YougeneDebs]

Thank you for watching. Your opinion is very important to me.

Debs

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

As always, great video, Debs!

5 *****

You da' man, brother!

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for the rating!

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

Surely.

And thank you for your exceptional work, Debs!

[terrymanning1]

Excellent video. Simonshack is lying scum.

[YougeneDebs]

Thank you very much!

[s8rl]

hey do you have a longer version of the galileo one ?

thanks!

[YougeneDebs]

Sorry, but no; not really. You'll have to Google Galileo Mystery 911 and have a look.

Thanks for watching!

[brokenstyx]

great video!

"auto-debunkery"! LOL  excellent!

[fresniak]

Good! You completely debunked the shill Simon. I always knew he was pushing some agenda..

There was tv fakery, there were fake tv witnesses but not everything was tv fakery.

The pictures of the demolition are true!

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks for watching!

But, just to be clear, my presentation was only about the helicopter; not about the collapse.

In other words, the fotage could still be fraudulant, just for other, as yet unspecified, reasons.

See what I mean?

[fresniak]

"In other words, the fotage could still be fraudulant, just for other, as yet unspecified, reasons."

yes but till then (till these unspecified reasons will eventually come out) I don't have any logical reason to doubt about the fact that the demolition happened the way we have seen it in the footage.

Tv Fakery does not mean that you have to create a 100% virtual reality, like Simon is trying to imply at all cost.

[YougeneDebs]

fresniak~

Well said!

[youroom101]

Thanks for your work on this! Simon's making things up again for some agenda. I have always said that if they fake it they would not remove an elements from one shot to the next. This would make it obviously fake, so why would they do that? You would expect consistency in the videos, because it would be easy to fake it correctly in the first place. We are back to the demolition again, the real footage proves without a question that the tower was blown to bits by explosives.

[KimmoKuopio]

Michael,

ss-man says that nobody died on 9/11.

Do you think/know that he's mentally ill?

Or do you know why he says something like that?

btw there is no evidence of explosives in the towers.

[youroom101]

lol really!!

Next he'll be saying the towers are still there!

'Do you think/know that he's mentally ill?' No! I think he's running with an idea, for fun or for pure disinformation. I get the feeling he doesn't believe a word of it.

'btw there is no evidence of explosives in the towers. ' Do you believe two aeroplanes can totally demolish three buildings that where designed to take multiple impacts. We all know they never looked for explosive residue on the steel, I wonder why?

[KimmoKuopio]

If he does that for fun, then he's a very sick man.

simonshack's Channel

Channel Comments (389)

2 Next

simonshack (1 month ago)

There were no planes - and most likely no victims at all on September11, 2001.

I don't believe, I know that the towers collapsed.

Again, there is no evidence of explosives in the towers.

[youroom101]

'I know that the towers collapsed' That's a bold statement! If you are correct then they should evacuate all tall towers straight away and never build another one. The aeroplane had little effect on the massive structure we are told, and most of the planes fuel was burnt off. So you are left with fire. Fire alone you say can demolish into dust a skyscraper in an unbelievably short time. I tell you if you told anyone before 2001 they wouldn't believe you, for good reason.

[KimmoKuopio]

yr1

The huge jumbo jet had a massive effect on the tower, as any skyscraper on the planet.

Hey, why building codes ruquire fireproofing the steal?

1 hour fire is a BIG problem in any building, ~6-7 hours fire means the building is doomed.

[Weirdo10o4]

Look at the deformations before the collapse, don't tell me the fire didn't do anything. Fire initiated the collapse, as we see from footage, the collapse starts where the columns are buckling inwards, after a full collapse begins it couldn't have stopped, as the designer knew such a collapse wouldn't stop.

[youroom101]

The towers where like three buildings built on top of each other. Reinforced section can be seen in pictures of each tower. The so called pancake collapse travelled just as fast past these sections. How would the mechanics of collapse be explained. Until someone comes up with a reasonable explanation I'll keep asking questions.

[YougeneDebs]

youroom101~

Thanks for watching!

Yes, I agree that Psyman has an agenda; I think it's to discredit the Truth Movement in general and the Concept of Fakery in particular.

[The911REGIMENT]

mmm  I thought that was your agenda YougeneDebs.. ;-)

[The911REGIMENT]

discrediting the Truth movement in general and TV Fakery in particular...

[YougeneDebs]

Do you know anything about 'parallax'?

[911conspiracyTV]

Well DONE.

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks you, too!

[pumpitout]

Excellent work as always Debs!

[YougeneDebs]

Thanks!