Added: 3 years ago
From: Lpositive
Views: 56,564
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ja kuinka monta näitä lähtee nyt saudi arabiaan? :D

  • Comment removed

  • nice

  • And this is where it shows that Finnland has better politicians than we do in Sweden... ours pulled out of the AMOS system

  • @suetra84 WHAT! BUT IT'S SUCH AN AMAZING SYSTEM! THE BEST THING FINNS AND SWEDES HAVE DONE TOGETHER!

    We at least kept AMOS here in Finland O.o In fact, the mass-production of these vehicles for FDF has begun and there should be 18 of them in service by 2013.

  • Today in Libya we see how the french Rafale and paneuropean EF Typhoon are handling a multirole assignments.

    They can do everything. Hit aircraft, ground targets, surface vessels.

  • @Jyrki1964

    ... provided that Americans provide fuel, precise munitions, C4SRI and Lybia never had anything remotely capable of threating any combat aircraft younger than their own Mirage IIIs :D They have free run like on proving ground, and still fail to accomplish anything meningful.

  • Jos minä olisin teollisuusneuvos, niin vaatisin Suomea aloittamaan yhteistyön SAAB:n kanssa ja kehittämään meille paitsi erinomaisen ilma-aseen kuin myös myyntivaltin maailman valtioille, jotka haluavat huipputeknogisia hävittäjiä/taistelijoita...(ni­inhän niiden sanotaan olevan. Hävittävät vihollisen ilmataistelukoneet)

    F-15 Eagle oli lajissaan ensimmäinen ja erittäin menestyksekäs. 104 pudotusta. Yksikään F-15 ei koskaan hävinnyt. Track record 104-0.

  • @Jyrki1964 Samaa mieltä, minä aloittaisin aktiivisen puolustusyhteistyön pohjoismaiden kanssa (ei tarvitsisi enään hapattaa siitä NATO:sta) ja samalla pohjoismaat voisivat lyödä yhteen sen osaamisen, teknologian ja kilpailukyvyn ja tehdä yhdessä vaikka jotain moderneja hävittäjiä ja ojuspuolustussysteemejä ja yleensäkkin aseita, ja myydä niitä.

  • @Jyrki1964 Koneen track record taitaa kyllä kertoa enemmän käyttäjien organisaatioista, tiedonkäsittelykyvystä ja resursseista, kuin koneen kyvyistä. Veikkaanpa, että niissä konflikteissa, joissa F-15 on ollut mukana, samoja tuloksia olisi käytännössä voitu saada melkeinpä F-4:llä.

  • 3 ryssää ei tykänny tästä

  • Finding Nemo

  • I was looking for nemo a long time ago, now I found it

  • Oh how I wish

    For soothing rain

    Oh how I wish to dream again

    Once and for all

    And all for once

    Nemo my name for evermore

    Nemo sailing home

    Nemo letting go

    - Nightwish

  • Hope they put that on CV90 and exporte some of them to sweden! :D Looks Epic! 

  • tolla ois komee ampuu neekereitä

  • @matwambe niinpä :D

  • Pöh. On mulla tili säästöpankissakin :)

  • 1:03 o.O

  • Pohjoismaiden kannattaisi kyl liittoutua ihan valtiollisestikin, kun meillä on kuitenkin niin paljon yhteistä ja varsinkin yhteisiä tavoitteita. Yhdessä olisimme maailman 10. suurin talousmahti. (edellä mm. Kanadaa, jonka asukasluku on 35 miljoonaa ja meitin vain 25 miljoonaa).

    Meiän pankit ja talous muutenkin alkaa olla kovasti sidoksissa toisiinsa. Mulla on tili sammossa, joka on osa Danske Bankia. Nordea on yhteispohjoismainen ollut jo aikoja. Meillä on paljon yhteisiä yhtiöitä/yhteistyötä.

  • This AMV is so hard to kill, that when it is equipped with NEMO, you could consider it as a fucking light tank rather than AMV XD

  • Naff music, someone should set an artillery advert to Dimmu Borgir.

  • Aw, it's like a simple version of the XM1204. I guess the barrel's triangular so that we know it's more advanced.

  • @AreThereNoMoreNames With the exception that NEMO and AMOS systems are in service unlike your XM1204.

  • @SuperFinnish Yeah. Funny how that works. A few years ago, the U.S. was getting ready fo field some of the most advanced equipment anyone had seen, then all of a sudden, it's all relegated to being prototypes that we'll never see in service. I wonder why that is. (Sarcasm, of course. I know exactly why that is)

  • this and Vena are one of the best mortar systems around the world today

  • Wolverine :D Polish army roxx

  • watch... finish army is going to start manufacturing better weapons and vihicles then the U.S.

  • @DjCroatia1993 Russia have already better manufacturing=)

  • @Qlasettaja Russia has the best aircraft in the world no doubt about it. However; there is a reason why when a LAV or a Bradley gets blown up in Baghdad and a PATRIA doesn't. Taliban simply cancel their missions. I read all about these monsters. But you are correct. Russia has couple things they make that are made very well and no country could beat. We should not forget Russia's greatest legacy: The Ak-47.

  • @DjCroatia1993 The Taliban are not in Bagdad, they are in Afganistan. Don't know of but a few examples where a LAV or Bradley were destroyed. Russia makes some good stuff without a doubt, but the best equipment on the ground or in the air is US made.

  • @Qlasettaja Russia lost its military manufacturing base during the 1990's. They have never regained it. Their military is only a shadow of what it once was. Most of its equipment is getting very old and needs replacement yet the country can only afford a few high profile projects while trying to maintain the little it has. Russias military has serious military problems.

  • @DjCroatia1993 they are. atleast our weapons are not made in china

  • @barfumer Yes. I do find it a shame that most of the worlds AK-47's are made in China. It amazes me, a good weapon should be made in its own country. The Chinese no offence to them but they really have no idea how to produce things. They are too cheap. They may have a good military; I mean they got one of the best tanks in the world. But over-all they're really not about quality.

  • @DjCroatia1993 no wonder "american" products break down so easily

  • @barfumer Yes. Their Abrams may be a "beast" but its got a major disadvantage. The reason they get destroyed is because the Taliban know those tanks need to refuel every two hours. By the time the chopper comes to refuel the tank takes 30-40 minutes. By then the tank is already destroyed if its not protected by a convoy of at least 2 Humvee's and 10-12 foot soldiers. Americans don't really know much about tactical warfare, especially in urbanized combat.

  • @DjCroatia1993 and thats why theyre getting their asses ripped to shreds

  • @DjCroatia1993

    Sounds like you're the one who doesn't know anything about tactical warfare :(

  • @DjCroatia1993 Abrams needs to ber refueled every 2 hours? Where do you get your information? Suggest you do a little research before making such statements. Also don't know of any Abrams being "destroyed" in Afganistan.

  • @DjCroatia1993

    :) lol patria-finish army?????

  • @DUMPPERI Yes they invented it.

  • @DjCroatia1993 What do you mean "Going to"? It does already.

  • @DjCroatia1993 What do you mean "going to"? They already do.

  • @DjCroatia1993 dude, they already have.

  • @DjCroatia1993 Already been doing that ;)

  • @DjCroatia1993 you right

  • Shit, a Jurmo with a NEMO-system! I love those boats, done quite a few trips around the Finnish archipelago on one of those...

  • videon ser fan ball ut xD

  • Your mother does.

  • tack antar jag :S

  • In this package, nothing is swedish!

  • swedish engine maybe? scania

  • @kronan11

    Could be.

  • @kronan11 Depends the version.

    But the Finnish one is better.

  • @iivaris And you consider that important? Sure, it sounds fun, but also childish.

  • @OnlyLifeMatters Many people seems to like that comment! Don't take everything so seriously. ;)

  • @iivaris Ahaa, olitkin suomalainen niin lopetetaans Lontoon kieli sitten. Juu, onhan se kivaa saada näitä suomen omia tekeleitä kehiin, mutta niitä on niin vähän että ihan hirvittää. Siinä ei kande rehennellä kauheesti :D. Suomen kannattaisi aloittaa massiivinen asetuotanto, ja varustella armeijansa kotimaisella tuotannolla, sitten myydä niitä ulkomaille. Selviäsi semmoisella useammankin laman - sillä on vain kolme alaa joihin lama ei vaikuta: huoraus, huumediilaus ja rehti asekauppa.

  • @OnlyLifeMatters On niitä vähän, mutta Patrian AMV on kyllä todellinen saavutus. Monen mielestä jopa maailman paras! Ja ei siinäkään tietenkään mitään pahaa ole, että ruotsin kanssa tehdään paljon näiden kanssa yhteistyötä, mutta on se ihan kiva, että saadaan jotain aivan itse aikaiseksi. Tosin AMV:ssa on Scanian kone. :D

    Ei meidän tarvitse siitä kantaa huolta ettei kaikkea saada itse tehtyä. Ruotsi on niin läheinen liittolainen ja sieltä löytyy PALJON omasta takaa.

  • @iivaris There was one picture here, with the turret mounted on a Swedish vehicle, CV90.

  • You are comparing NEMO to system what does not see service for a long time.

  • Do you suppose metal storm has a range comparable to NEMO?

  • Fully electornic means usually that is it very easy to destroy. For instance in modern tanks the biggest problems are the electronic shooting mechanisms. Even if the tank seems fine on the outside the shocks caused by the enemy or just moving can easily break some of the electronic parts.

  • Not to mention EMPs ...

  • The problem with EMP is that it is not something you shoot at every tank that comes to pass by.

    It requires a quite big explosion to generate electromagnetic field (usually generated by nuclear explosions)

    It is used more at stuff like airports and powerplants etc big objects to bring them down.

    Using such would be a huge waste at tanks in the middle of thick forest in which you can't see from air.

  • and EMP's tend to make huge collaterale damage, as it likes to erase credit cards, and makes airplanes crash.

  • good point crews too can be knocked unconscious by hits and the tank still look fine and drive

  • @masan3llo

    First of all, how do you shoot 10 000 grenades out of one weapon in a minute? maybe with 50 weapons or a hundred that could be possible. And even if it can shoot that fast, loading would be impossible for that kind of amount of ammunitions.

    I also watched some sort of document about that weapon. Designers said that it isn´t designed to be offensive weapon and the best scenario for that gun is for example defending a base. I rest my fucking case!!

  • how? metal storm, check it out.

  • @presbarkeep

    Metal storm has still long way to go before we see it in landwarfare.

  • don't mistake raw power with being technologically superior.

  • Now tell me a system that can actually mount that thing. 48 barrel firing mechanism with full autoloader, takes a while to design. Doesn't take much to think of it.

  • not...

  • There is nothing better in metal storm compared to NEMO. And you have to realize that metal storm shoots 40mm grenades, not the full 120mm combat grenade.

  • @Trekker84 The effect of 10 000 40mm metal storm can easily be achieved with the use of cluster munitions, but if they are banned then metal storm might have to be the way to go :P

  • @Hairysteed ...at least until they ban that as well

  • That crew protection is quite good actually.

  • lol haha

  • What idiotic comments...

  • these look really cool! And effective!

  • Croatia european asshole!!

  • Your mom must be shit since Slovenia bought it.

  • yeea

  • Awsome!

    Proud to be the first country ordering these :D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more