Merely presenting the difference in the number of "troubled banks" as compared to '87 is MEANINGLESS without also presenting the difference in the number of total banks (eligible or in exisitence) as compared to '87. Isn't the consolidation of banks into giant too-large-to-fail entities part of the sh**storm we're facing? I have no idea, but judging from this video I imagine you're some kind of expert. If your intent is to help please answer this question. If it's just to get hits, nevermind.
check out this video >> Bob Chapman 2035 Banks ....
JimboJammer1 2 years ago
Bottom line? You could work your butt off & lose it all?
BUMMER!
ytuber28341 2 years ago
Merely presenting the difference in the number of "troubled banks" as compared to '87 is MEANINGLESS without also presenting the difference in the number of total banks (eligible or in exisitence) as compared to '87. Isn't the consolidation of banks into giant too-large-to-fail entities part of the sh**storm we're facing? I have no idea, but judging from this video I imagine you're some kind of expert. If your intent is to help please answer this question. If it's just to get hits, nevermind.
keptyeti 3 years ago