CHARLES DARWIN (Great Scientists) - Part 1of3

[ItsOneInAMillion]

A great man well ahead of his time.

[TheBlackhawkSniper]

People think they know everything about Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution without having read the actual theory. I suggest EVERYONE, no matter what you believe, go pick up "The Origin of Species" to better understand this beautiful work of art. Until people do this, the arguments on here will continue to be laughed at by those who have. I understand that those who disagree are strong willed, but please quit posting ignorant, uneducated comments trying to argue the theory until you've read it.

[darkfur35]

evolution is a bad fairy tale.

[mrshank78]

@darkfur35 and anybody who thinks god created man out of dust and women out of a mans ribs is a fucking moron

[darkfur35]

@mrshank78 You just proved that evolution is a big farce/. Insults are a result of lack of knowledge.

[mrshank78]

@darkfur35 ergo my point how the church hopes people dont realize that it makes no sense and your comment was also an insult you dumbshit bible jockey

[DBO165]

@darkfur35 really? at least evolution has evidence what does god have hmmm?

[darkfur35]

@DBO165 there isnt any evidence for evolution, just misinterpreted data. If you understood God, you would be shaking in your boots.

[DBO165]

@darkfur35 you god believers are really quite blind to science you just dont understand things so you make up things if god excists how did he magicly come into the universe aliens sare real bunch of evidence proving god dosent excist adam and eve could not have repopulated the earth they would have died of infections in their bodies from having too much babies misinteroreted data? evolution has been studied for centuries and christians are stumped when asked the question

[TheMeteorStrike]

Darwin made love to his own cousin and gave life to inbred filth which died shortly afterwards (most likely because Brits and Irishmen have done inbreeding for a long time), “keep the bloodline pure” my ass, being human is filth in itself, but outdoing most animals by inbreeding for a long period of time is ridiculous, I don’t respect inbred people or people who do inbreeding without a good reason, Darwin wasn’t a genius, he was a retard, he was dumb enough to marry and fuck his own cousin.

[TulleExplosion]

@TheMeteorStrike Darwin doesn't need the respect of someone nobody knows or cares about. He's got a world full of people who respect him and have taught and debated his theories for more than a hundred years. The "inbred" filth you're talking about was someones child, who was sorely missed after she died. Grow up.

[daogdaog]

darwin evolution is wrong based on scientific evidence. fossils dated 250 million years ago  clearly showed that species never evolved at all.

[DrZenith]

'Even today, some people find his (Darwin's) ideas difficult to accept..' says the presenter. I say that no-one of intelligence who studies the evidence with an open mind can fail to accept evolution as the reason for how and why life is as it is today.

[Mr88playmaker]

Darwin was a poor nut who lived Centuries ago and thought that monkeys turn into folks slowly over time.

DNA code is empirical proof that biological life forms are a creative product of information and language. i.e.: Nous / Logos (Einstein called this: "The MIND of GOD").

Because of this, atheists are busy trying to replace their theory of origins of life and are attempting to reinvent Darwin via propaganda while allowing his nonsense to still be taught in the schools.

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker Information is dependent on observation. Without an observer there is no information. Your creationist nonsense has failed miserably on all fronts. Meanwhile, evolution is an observed fact and the processes of variation and natural selection have become the new foundation for great progess in every known field of engineering. As for "atheists" ..."busy tying to replace their theory of origins" ...etc. You've been brainwashed and you're delusional. Go get help.

[Mr88playmaker]

@MrMZaccone (QUOTE) "Information is dependent on observation. Without an observer there is no information." )END QUOTE)

Wrong. You are confusing data with information. Tow different things.

Information is the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.

What that means is that knowledge or intelligence (which are two things that arises from a mind) when communicated or received equal INFORMATION.

You made a mistake and spoke too soon. You equated information with data.

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker Communication or reception by whom? LOL! You're still brainwashed and delusional. Go see a shrink. You have a severe apophenia problem. And don't start quoting me "Dumbsky" or other similar morons, their math and logic are specious at best.

[Mr88playmaker]

@MrMZaccone (QUOTE): "Communication or reception by whom?" (END QUOTE)

That's the big question facing science today.

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker No, it's the biggest circular argument used by creationists and you'd have to be an idiot not to see it ... It's information because it's made by a mind and it's made by a mind because it's information ... please!

[Mr88playmaker]

@MrMZaccone (QUOTE):"No, it's the biggest circular argument used by creationists " (END QUOTE)

Information is the communication or reception of knowledge or intelligence.

Knowledge and intelligence arise only from a MIND.

DNA is encoded with information.

That's not "circular" anything. It's plain scientific facts. The reason it sounds "circular" to you is because it makes you chase your tail trying to figure out how to get out of it. DNA killed Darwin.

DNA is encoded with information.

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker Your argument is entirely semantic and still circular. Your apophenia is showing. "communication or reception" ... "or reception" implies that reception can occur without transmission. Would you like to adress that? or would you like to change that part of the definition to "and reception"? Obviously from that definition, information can exist without a creator. The T. O. E. will be the foundational, binding theory of biology long after you and I are dead and gone.

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker You will never see the end of it and it's doubtful anyone else will either. It will "evolve" as all "theories" do as we get more "information" (LMAO) but it's factual nature will remain even as your "creator" fades into obscurity, redefined by new "information" until its nature is clear. Anthony Flew's conversion to DEISM is at best an indication of his declining mental powers matching his declining years. The use of it as evidence is at best erroneous and at worst shameful.

[Mr88playmaker]

@MrMZaccone (QUOTE): "You're still brainwashed and delusional." (END QUOTE)

Don't embarrass yourself. Richard Dawkins chose the word "Delusion" for his ridiculous book when he realized that he had built his academic career on a LIE called Evolution. When his mentor Antony Flew of Oxford concluded that DNA destroyed Evolutionary theory, Dawkins remembered a verse in the Bible that speaks about evolutionists: "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"

[MrMZaccone]

@Mr88playmaker I see no reason in any of your recent bullshit to argue with you any further. You're a waste of my time.

[TheBaldmeister]

@Mr88playmaker Anthony Flew was a philosopher who as far as I can see never studied biology. If he had, he would have realised that DNA supports evolution absolutely.

[animefreaks456]

What was the captain's name on the ship?

[Geochron]

The name of the captain of the HMS Beagle was Robert FitzRoy.

[samgee2007]

theory of gravity is still factual right? so does theory of evolution.

[hiawathabanias]

but even though others dont believe his theory. i MYSELF still believes.... even if it is just a theroy. cause i see a facts in his discoveries.

[hiawathabanias]

charles darwin took 23 years to complete his book the origin of species. it is just his theory and some scientist would accepts his idea. some rejects. charles darwin is a genius! now we need to use our logic to understand things. we people have a freedom.

[resistanceunion]

Too bad debunkers got debunked .. watch thunderf00t .. But if it was wrong witch other theory would you agreed with hmm ??

[gregrutz]

Darwin didn't invent evolution, he came up with a mechanism for it. He explained how it happened.

He didn't publish his book right away because it would upset his religious wife.

[spacey5ify]

Most people say that is it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character... - Albert Einstein

[relaxpeace]

Nature passes in a continuous gradation from soulless to animals, through the living beings that are not animals (p.ex. leaves and microorganisms as food), with the result the akin (living beings) are so close to each other that their difference seems infinitesimal (Α-Ι, On the Parts of Animals 681, α31).

Humans do not deserve fearmongering! :)

[relaxpeace]

The HISTORY of evolution was just re-introduced by Darwin, who knew Greek and that the first to describe the HISTORY of evolution were Ancient Greek Anaximander and the cautious democratic Aristotle with his books 'On the Parts of Animals' (681, a31) and 'The History of Animals'.

[Importantspectator]

Maby it was.. but Darwin didnt know about the greeks and that they also knew about the laws of nature.. he might have re introduced it but he didnt steal the idea :P

And frankly i dont care who came up with the idea first.. the evidence is still exsisting :P

[relaxpeace]

It couldn't be important who came up first, if corrupted socratics, pelleans, romans and other genociders hadn't stop progress for 2400 years, and their successors do it now through lies and (curable) 'superiority' complex.

So, as Darwin accepted guilty (1872) of hushing up his Greek (non-oligarchic) readings, why some still hush up all other people who had described warless human evolution with no use of scarecrows?

Fear of fearlessness?

Humans do not deserve fear addiction! :)

[ogirv101]

"The HISTORY of evolution was just re-introduced by Darwin"

NO NO NO, Darwin did 5 years of research on organisms and observed and postulated Evolution, the greeks had 'ideas' that weren't supported by evidence, and most of the ideas by people like Aristotle and Anaximander were wrong, in fact even Lamarck was wrong. Do research correctly.

[relaxpeace]

So Anaximanders' "humans EVOLVED from fishes" and Aristoltles' Life EVOLUTION CLIMAX were not supported by bones and brain evidence? Is it beneficial to kill Archimedes again?

Humans do not deserve fear addiction! :)

[ogirv101]

fear addiction? What does this have anything to do with it, I just prove your unintellectual and pseudo-scientific claims wrong. I hate liars, that is all.

[peacearchanthropuses]

Aristotle for natural selection:When the teeth grow in this suitable way,then the animal survives.When they do not,then the animal dies.More explicitly,the way the teeth grow is not for the sake of the animal&its survival or its death is just a coincidence(Phys198b29-32).AsD­arwin named egoist aggression(thatDESTROYED faraos,Myceneans,Romans,Mayans­,crusaders,Aztecs,Incas etc)as'natural''selection',ins­tead of mutual-aid,he confused more people.Aren't cool-headed+luckiest GROUPSthe usual survivers?

[eplfootiefan]

I live in a place called Lichfield in England,a couple of houses away is where Erasmus Darwin,Grandfather and philosopher,who inspired his grandsons beliefs lived.

Also Erasmus Darwin was one of the people behind the Industrial revolution.

His Grandson followed his work.

[FuzzyDuck]

I really want to go to the natural history museum in London someday.

[bonangusacdc]

I agree with Richard Dawkins when he said 'Charles Darwin had the greatest idea ever to occur to a human mind'.

[GsliMaIiy]

@bonangusacdc

1. Jesus Christ fulfills over 2-0-0 Old Testament Messianic Prophecies ( Isaiah 9:6-7; etc.) Google Messianic Prophecies fulfilled by Jesus

2. Jesus Christ makes 30 “I AM” statements in the Gospel of John.

a. “… for unless you believe that I am, you shall die in your sins.” (John 8:24)

Check the Gospel of John in the New Testament.

3. 17 Secular sources confirm that Jesus Christ walked the earth (Celsus, Tacitus, Lucian, etc.) Google Secular sources for Jesus.

[gregrutz]

@GsliMaIiy Yes, Jesus walked the earth, so did dinosaurs for 160 Million years, changing over time.

[viva1992]

is this from the discovery channel?

[creationismisstupid]

"Darwin a failed student" he obtained a masters degree in theology after quitting his medical studies in Scotland, he didn't fail. During his studies at Cambridge he continued studying biology and geology. So I don't know what you mean by "failed". He didn't discover natural selection since it was already known in his time to exist but he gave us a logical explanation of how natural selection and evolution fit together. What he did introduce however was sexual selection.