Added: 2 months ago
From: TheRealNews
Views: 1,959
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (108)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I, personally, doubt it was an inside job.

    However I don't doubt the fact that there are some very shady things about 9/11 and alot of question marks surrounding it, I do think that some segments of the U.S. government either knew about an imminent attack or saw it coming, but decided not to act upon it, either because they saw this as a golden opportunity to curb civil rights and impose a surveillance state, or because of private, profiteering motives.

  • Another vital interview/chat with the conservative Republican Bush-41 insider and learned and fascinating professor. Good job Paul!

  • The book ought to be a damn good one.

  • man i was sure this awesome special would have at least 5000 views. oh well, i hope you guys still got at least a couple of dozen new supporters out of it...

  • What Paul said is right there should be investigations just for the simple fact that millions of people don't completely buy the govts take on everything that happened on 9/11.

  • i'm DONATING !!!!

  • the documentary "911 Missing Links" seems to do a pretty thorough investigation

    watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4

  • arghhh... c'mon Paul, relax about the 9-11 inside job. It is so at odd with the usually clever way you analyse the politic scene that I'm wondering if this is really what you think. If not, then why ? hmm.. maybe an inside job on your own credibility..

    This apart, keep up the good work man

  • Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, (Ret.), Thank you.

  • Very interesting news.

  • I am unsubscribing due to Paul Jay being a truther. Fuck off "Real" News.

  • 9/11 was NOT an inside job.

  • Google (12 masonic signs "eyes looking up")

    At a point where Wilkerson begins to discuss the 9-11 Truth movement at 16:53 he gives "a sign of distress."

    Even an engineer can be tricked by a smarter expert paid to lie who has done their homework better.

    Google (liberal arts Trivium Quadrivium logical fallacies)

    Unless a person in a discussion is master of the art or science of arguing, then they could be tricked into accepting or believing or supposing very unlikely scenarios.

  • Real News stoops quite low here to give some cred to the 911 "truthers". Good luck collecting their contributions.  REAL NEWS ?!?!? I think NOT.

  • @ofpfury

    well, if the only reason you would donate for the real news is for them to say what you want to hear then you should not

  • @ofpfury What is your take on the video (Mohammed Atta and The Venice Flying Circus Daniel Hopsicker) with length 61 minutes on YouTube.

    And I suppose all your friends believe & preach that JFK was killed by a lone nut--unlike the info presented in the (JFK 2 documentary) video on Google videos? Nor like what the Church Committee findings were about the JFK murder found? Or that info of Prof Dr Antony C. Sutton about FDR & Pearl Harbor or of Waco Rules of Engagement?

  • Comment removed

  • @ofpfury What's your take on Google (fog of war gulf of tonkin incident McNamara admits didn't happen).

    Yeah, the government never lies? It's all crazy talk? Everyone who notes these news story & historical idiosyncrasies are just hyping crazy, unprovable conspiracy theories? Yeah & repeating to everyone that they are all crazy--how is that working out for your delusional matrix of virtual reality?

  • @ofpfury I had heard claims that were not very substantiated about Hitler burning down his own parliament buildings of the Reichstag--that is until I saw some documentary film footage recorded at the trial for the accused Polish mentally handicapped guy where someone pointed out that security was so high that only Hitler & his own men would have had opportunity to have set all the fires, then blame the whole thing on their patsy client & his politics. YT video 6c7Wi8ILGcM & others.

  • How about the one where the reporter announced that building 7 fell before it did and there was no reason for it to even come down other than Silverstein saying take it down.

  • @cityguyusa

    "How about the one where the reporter announced that building 7 fell before it did"

    It's just as strange as when the newsman says it's going to rain before it does. It's not a conspiracy, it's science. The FD knew it was going to come down because it had taken more damage than it could handle.

    "Silverstein saying take it down."

    No, Silverstein said that the FDNY made a decision to pull their men out, because it was obvious the building was lost.

  • @newdimensionfilms Building 7 had no reason to come down. It wasn't near anything, it wasn't hit by anything. But whatever lets you sleep through the night.

  • @cityguyusa

    "It wasn't near anything"

    Except tower 1

    "it wasn't hit by anything"

    ...except tower 1.

    Most of the photo and videos of WTC 7 were from the north side, but the towers were on the south side, which is why it looks less damaged than it was.

  • @newdimensionfilms Until then & subsequently, no steel high-rise towers had ever collapsed from fire alone.

    YT Jlxw9TZ_0Cc plus all the comments referring to further evidence videos of count down to demolition & explosions.

    In videos I've seen of experts they say that there was no fuel stored on multiple floors that could account for the multiple explosions.

    In the 70s or 80s I had heard of something "a mini-nuke" that was 14 inches long that could blast a huge amount damage.

  • @newdimensionfilms Google search (Ted Gunderson Oklahoma City bombing barometric "Hercules Manufacturing")

    There are all sorts of explosives available to military level security forces that are not generally known about in the public domain. Whether mini-nukes or barometric bombs, or other little-known devices, any one of which could be used to blow the central columns out of any of the towers involved, thereby accounting for how much pulverized concrete dust was created.

  • @newdimensionfilms Ur NOT accurate because, after 1 & 2 fell, water mains for WTC7 had failed & that is why automatic sprinkler systems did not put out the fires in the first place.

    Afterward no firemen were in building 7 b/c there was no water pressure in the fire hydrant stations on any of the floors--so Silverstein Pull-It does not mean Pull Teams out.

    Google (WTC 7 sprinkler water main).

    YT 0YvrKfWkxdw

    What caused multi witnessed WTC7 multi explosions?

    YT PbbZE7c3a8Q

  • Wow, the whole notion of having Truth and Reconciliation Commissions is something associated with developing nations recovering from despotic regimes and catastrophic wars.

    And yet it's coming to the US.

  • The Congress gave Netanyahu standing ovations because there wasn't enough space to kowtow.

    Netanyahu telling Turkey to fuck off is news to me, but is definitely stupidity of the highest order. He made the Turkish secularists look like idiots! I can already hear the Islamists in Ankara saying that there's no point in cooperating with the lunatics in Tel Aviv.

  • I just can't trust Larry because of his stance on 911. He appear to be a good guy but he could also be lying. The evidence about 911 being a false flag is overwhelming. And then there WTC7 which only makes it too easy to figure out we were duped.

    And it's not the MIC(military industrialized complex) folks. Nethenyu came and showed who's boss. He put it right in our faces & he know we're not gonna do anything about it.

  • @MustacheVerra why don't you read the book Wilkinson talked about ("The 11th day" or something). He said it debunked every conspiracy theory regarding the engineering stuff.

  • @sl2mmer lol... How the hell can you debunk WTC7 being a control demolition? Same for the towers. Just take a look at WTC7 and you should get it right away. Most people do...

  • @MustacheVerra well read the damn book and maybe you'll find out. You obviously spend a lot of your time preaching this stuff on the internet but have you actually put any time into reading the counter-arguments?

  • @sl2mmer I bet he doesn't even address WTC7 collapse like all debunkers do. They just avoid it.

    Yea I've the read counter arguments and they are very weak at best!.

    A control demo is like a piece of music. Every notes need to be place at a precise position on the staff and then be triggered at a specific moment in time at a precise velocity. , Nothing is random. So like music, a demo need to have boom placed at a specific location and triggered at a specific moment in time. WTC7 was a demo

  • @MustacheVerra

    "I bet he doesn't even address WTC7 collapse like all debunkers do. They just avoid it."

    Except that they don't. Every debunker I've ever seen has addressed WTC7. First hit on google for "debunking 911" has an entire section devoted to WTC7. Just because you stick your head in the sand doesn't mean it goes away.

  • @newdimensionfilms Now you're just lying. I've read most debunkers and they don't address WTC7. Like popular mechanics. The 911 commission either. What a joke.

    I'm not going to debate this anymore than i will debate the earth is flat theory.

  • @MustacheVerra

    "I've read most debunkers and they don't address WTC7"

    Like I said the first result for "911 debunking" has an explanation of WTC7.

    "Like popular mechanics"

    Popular mechanics has an article on WTC7. Took me 12 seconds to find.

    "The 911 commission either. What a joke."

    The 911 commission was not a technical report of the collapses. It was about the events that lead up to the attacks (ie the actions of the hijackers prior to 9/11).

    Dumbass.

  • @newdimensionfilms Various technical theories as to how exactly collapse initiated, etc, are missing vital evidence. Dressing up technical theories leads away from the facts that the people who collected evidence deliberately did a poor enough job as to be accurately called a cover-up rather than an investigation.

    According to one the designers of the Norad Radar defense network, they can track a very small flock of birds or small boats world wide. None of this was a mistake.

  • @newdimensionfilms The reason that none of this was a mistake is b/c the people making the largest mistakes were rewarded rather than punished for incompetence. That means the government got what they ordered, and rewarded those who took part.

  • @newdimensionfilms Zionist interests virtually controlled the Bush administration. Within weeks of being sworn into office plans to invade Iraq had begun.

    If you are clueless, please investigate "geopolitics." Lots of this planning happened a long time ago.

    YT X63CQ-dXkwU Dancing Israelis: "Our purpose was to document the event."

    Statement is casually dismissed by highly biased Zionist debunkers.

    Israelis call 9-11 & say Palestinians were going to blow up the Holland Tunnel.

  • @newdimensionfilms Google video search (kurt OR lori haskell "underwear bomber" "well dressed" "American accent")

    The bomber tried to get aboard the plane but had no forms of identification so the airline clerk refused his access to board.

    It turns out that security for _ALL_ the airports where terrorist events originated were run by Israeli-based security corporations, 9-11 & the underwear bomber.

    YT FwaABKyVDtM

  • @sl2mmer When looking for that "The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11 & Osama bin Laden," book by Anthony Summers and Robbyn Swan,

    I found a review that said:

    "Summers and Robbyn Swan, acknowledge a debt to all these [other books] and many others. Not subject-matter experts, they've penned past bestsellers on surefire subjects: Frank Sinatra, Richard Nixon, Marilyn Monroe."

    So all "they did" was rehash information & applied whatever bias they wanted.

  • @sl2mmer The trouble is that reliable evidence collection & analysis for explosives just didn't happen, so that any books, reports, analysis written about not having explosives is just theoretical & based on no evidence collection.

    Google video search (bbc al qaeda does not exist)

    Google image search (zbigniew brzezinski osama bin laden)

    Google image search ("tim osman" cia)

    Google ("defense language institute" Hijackers trained by US military)

  • @sl2mmer Google video search for greater than 20 minutes videos of (Mohamed Atta and the venice flying circus)

    Evidence shows that legal papers filed for flight school attendees had many of them living at US military base addresses.

    John Connor: [the Terminator rips open the steering column of a car to hotwire it, John interrupts, jingling a set of keys before him] Are we learning yet?

    If you pay a good engineering expert to lie, you will get lies that can trick "the guy on the street."

  • This is what everybody sounds like once their office term is finished

  • LOL... Come Larry! You don't have to be an expert to understand world trade center 7 was a demo. The video is pretty much self explanatory. Same for the towers.

  • We Are Change needs to confront Wilkerson on his engineering observations about 9/11.

    I would do it myself. I am in NC.

  • This interview has convinced me. Wilkerson has his head up his ass.

  • Wilkerson and Jay are full of it:

    North Tower Exploding

    watch?v=bl6snl-Z7DU

    Their so-call engineers/scientist CAN NOT rebuke this analysis.

    Why can't there be a public debate. It will never be allowed to happen.

  • Wilkerson is a left gate keeper on 911. How sad.

  • I don't like the idea of large private donors. Who are these donors Real News?

    How do we know you aren't being funded by groups like the Ford Foundation that funds Democracy Now?

    Funding influences agenda, and I've noticed a specific agenda that ignores certain realities on the Real News. I am a donor to Real News, but it's becoming more and more cloudy what the agenda is. The coverage of Libya was atrocious, taking the side of the NATO, who massacred expnentially more people than Gaddafi.

  • @youngbuck189

    I don't remember TRNN taking the side of NATO.

    Evidences please.

  • @kazearaki You can go back and watch their videos. They supported the rebels from the start, and did not expose the massive casualties caused by NATO. NATO destroyed the country with bombs, and killed more people than Gaddafi could dream of.

    If you don't expose that fact, you are effectivly giving support to the NATO group.

  • @youngbuck189

    That's a rather lame excuse. I remember TRNN even went on great length to seek legal expert opinion in regard to what should be done to Libya which ultimately led to denouncing NATO air attack as way beyond the mandate. So, sorry, unless you can give me specific video evidence, I can't take your accusation and wild conclusion as valid.

  • @kazearaki It doesn't matter if there was a UN mandate, they murdered innocent people with their bombs. Many more people than Gaddafi killed, that should have been the focus of their coverage. Not a ragtag group of loyalists and a bunch of Islamic extremist rebels supported by groups like the National Endowement for Democracy which is a CIA front. Im not interested in polite coverage, Im interested in reality. Maybe you should stop posing with your anarcho-communist flag and get real.

  • @youngbuck189

    Do you even know what the UN mandate was? If my memory serve me right, TRNN did cover the war casualties, including the massive bombings by allied forces over Tripoli. It also did pointed out the CIA connection with the rebels.

    So once again, your original claim that TRNN taking the side of NATO to which you failed to provide any video evidences is simply false. Islamic extremist rebels? The majority are moderate! Are you happens to be one of those Alex Jones viewers?

  • @kazearaki I can see you are illiterate in geo-politics and the history of the region. I'm a real news doner is what I am. Go off and fancy yourself some more.

  • @youngbuck189

    Sure thing kid, anything that float your boat.

  • you know the movie the last mohican! this is the last american patriot. im generally not into patriotism but this guy is fucking smart! and this is what american politicians should look like.

  • Powerful stuff! Thank you.

  • I love listening to Larry Wilkerson. Man, what a guy. I wish our talking-head politicians were even half as intelligent, experienced and honest as this guy.

  • Just love listening to Larry. It's refreshing.

  • The reasons why we need a proper investigation of 911:

    1. 2 Wars for 10 years.

    2. TSA

    3. Homeland security

    4.  Rampant construction corruption in NY which may have been behind the collapse and loss of thousands of lives.

    5. Habeas Corpus.

    6. Wire Tapping

    7. Torture

  • @oolong2 Jesus Christ you fucking truthtards are obtuse.

  • @TheHerpaderpderp

    Not a single thing about my post was "truther"....

    You post without actually bothering to think. Somehow in your mind anyone who mentions "911 and investigation" somehow gets lumped together with "inside job" like a fucking Pavlovian dog,

    People in this world need to actually THINK instead of categorizing every GOD DAMN THING into truth vs conspiracy, conservative vs liberal, athiest vs thiest and all the other false dualities in this society.

  • @oolong2 You're a truther. Shut the fuck up. You are just now beginning to realize that the inside job theory is an embarrassingly stupid position to take so you are extra sensitive to anyone calling you out. And do not give me this bullshit about how you are just asking questions; all truthtards say that. The fact of the matter is that 9/11 was not an inside job. You are the one that needs to think if you hold the position that 9/11 was committed by the Bush administration.

  • @TheHerpaderpderp

    Nope you're just willfully ignorant.... Completely unable to comprehend anything outside of your little "categories".

    Then the rest of your comment goes on to make a complete fool of yourself. Who the fuck said anything about "asking questions"? Can you even hold a conversation outside of this imaginary "script" you've fabricated?

    But by all means, keep embarassing yourself. I'll bet you'll start talking about aliens and Elvis next.

  • @oolong2 That's ironic, given the fact that you believe 9/11 was an inside job. You probably believe Elvis is still alive, aliens visit earth, JFK not assassinated by LHO and the moon landing is a hoax. You are the one that should be embarrassed, but then again, you are stupid, and stupid people don't know they are stupid.

  • @TheHerpaderpderp

    lol you sure are predictable. Keep embarrassing yourself troll. The only person here believing your fairy tails is you.

    "stupid people don't know they are stupid."

    Exactly why most Trolls have no clue of what they are talking about.

  • Larry Wilkerson is a prime example of why I trust the military far more than our civilian intelligence agencies

  • Larry's hired, he can be my Chief of Staff. We need an independent prosecutor to investigate Wall St, another one to deal with the torturing trio, and finally one to punish Tenet and the others for their perfidy. Only by punishing the guilty can we hope for change in the future. I'm thinking Grayson for the Justice Department. He has the right temperment. Now, I just need another 50 million votes & we can fix Washington. Anybody have some spare votes they can pass my way? mikeballantine2012 org

  • Despite several attempts, I am disappointed that TRNN has YET to put Eric Janszen from iTulip on the air...

  • Very good. I don't think that Larry Wilkerson (LW) is sufficiently knowledgeable to be able to answer all of the questions posed with great expertise, but he evidently answers as best as he can.

    Re. 9/11 and the 9/11 Commission, we might find that the commissioners did a better job than we presently know of, but the final report remains very bogus, even if not completely. Several of the commissioners, and former CIA, ... and Congress people denounced the final report, the Bush admin and NORAD.

  • i don't trust larry wilkerson.

  • Larry...run for office!!

    

  • His voice trembles while talking about 9/11.... says a lot about it.

  • Oh, we had forgotten about Havana Bay in the Spanish American War, the Tonkin Gulf scenario and we must not discount the dirty tricks that Israel likes to play.

  • Comment removed

  • Who in hell worries about veterans once they return home from the dirty work that have been asked to do on behalf of the warm mongers in DC and in Zionville?

  • How many jews are serving in the US army?

  • Reason? Logic? That sounds unamerican to me. Lol

  • Comment removed

  • @claytunes How can I use the playlist that you mention in my address bar to get something other than a server error?

    Please post the link starting at /watch... so that I just have to copy/paste. The playlist usually specifies the starting video's ID code.

    If the steps are simple, then please give me a step by step of how to get it to play?

  • @oldspammer Thanks for pointing that out to me. I'll fix that.

    I wanted to send the link to my playlist and was not sure how that would work.

    Would something this be the correct way to do this?

    /user/claytunes#p/c/52E3191545­7F4B1F

    Thanks

    Clayton

  • @claytunes I've already commented on one of the videos in your playlist that I guessed was one of your own concerning this guy being interviewed.

    I don't think that this Wilkerson is reliable because he talks about known staged false flag attacks as though they were true: Pearl Harbor, OKC bombing, Waco, Ruby Ridge, WTC 1995 bombing, Gulf of Tonkin incident, etc. There is local news coverage of some of these & YT videos that differ from that of corporate controlled network news.

  • @oldspammer I do like some of the stuff Larry says He knows there is corruption in government and he says it, which is more than most.. But, do you notice that these guys always seem to speak the truth when they are not in office. They are all afraid to say this stuff when they have a job at the risk of losing that job by speaking their minds when they are in some power position. And yes, it's really hard to think anything these people say is true.

  • @claytunes The Waco Siege was about some religious group who thought & taught their children that the owners of the Babylonian monetary system was the New World Order who were in the process of bringing about the end of the world. The Branch Davidians of the 7th Day Adventists were small time dealers in gun shows to earn a living. Eventually Bill Clinton ordered the secretive Delta Force in to kill all of them. FLIR footage from the FBI shows full-auto machine guns killing survivors.

  • @claytunes In the Waco Siege, the key FBI sniper of the Ruby Ridge incident, Lon Horiuchi, may have been the main instigator to further escalated hostilities by killing his own forces as they tried to breach the upper window overlooking the lower roof area. I saw or read somewhere that the caliber of bullets in head shots of his own people did not match those of the weapons available to the opposing forces of the Branch Davidians. Several great videos on Waco exist--all horrific.

  • @claytunes The main Waco controversy was that the military grade tear gas was mistakenly used just happened to be flammable. But I later learned that CS tear gas (used in the Rainbow Six-3 video game series), when in flames, produces cyanide gas as a combustion product. When a person is killed via cyanide, it is very painful, their muscles spasm so hard that they can snap their own back bones.

  • @claytunes Remains of charred Waco children show their backs bent backwards in a u-shape indicating cyanide deaths prior to being incinerated by the intense fire storms.

  • @oldspammer I know, Waco incident was such a sin, I remember watching it on TV back then and thinking it was just wrong, even though I don't think any religious people are or ever could be right about anything, it was just wrong to kill them.

  • @oldspammer just fyi; in a regular fire, the smoke will also have some ´cyanide content. Whether that would be enough to bend someones back idk.

  • @claytunes I have a very good long term memory. When I see these revisionist historians pointing out the flaws in history that is routinely still taught in elementary & high schools, I eventually see truth in their arguments. I realize now that most of the deaths in the concentration camps were from overworking, starvation, cold, & disease. Even after British troops liberated some camps the disease death rates were 500+ per day for weeks until the spread of disease was eliminated.

  • @oldspammer Check out this guy

    user/Rys2sense?feature=g-user

    I've also read and seen some video on the holocaust that made me do some research. Hey, we are the kind of people that you have to prove facts to, we are not the norm...

  • @claytunes Most of all of the photos of death camps I've seen, the dead bodies are not contorted from extreme muscle spasms from cyanide gas poisoning--they are all thin, boney looking with no clothing on & shaved heads.

    Google video search (David Irving)

    Most camps were so poorly constructed, & overpopulated that freezing to death was very likely, so when a sick person died, the living would steal their clothes & dump the body outside the barracks. Lice eggs on clothes would spread.

  • Symmetrical damage is required for a symmetrical collapse. A commercial airliner, without its engines, is a big aluminum can.

  • Maybe the USA should get into a good old fashion nuclear war, and fry lots of Americans. Will that satisfy American's need to kill? What will it take to have peace?

  • This guy seems to be a true American patriot. A rare specimen in a scenario full of Israel-firsters.

  • I wish the Republicans were like this guy....I guess once upon a time they were...

  • @Zakdayak Yes and it was only about 50 years ago! The days of the Eisenhower republicans was destroyed by Reagan and his supply side baffoonery.

  • @DoctrinaBytes Well said...

  • @Zakdayak Keep the Republicans at bay. If you have to chose one, chose Ron Paul. If not, you don't have too many alternatives do you? But still, you do have one.

  • @Zakdayak At one time a long while ago, the two parties were one.

    Google ("democratic-republican party" 1790 Thomas Jefferson wiki)

    At the top today, behind the scenes the financiers, & industrialist tycoons who direct what legislation gets written are the same for Democrats & Republicans. There's a video that shows after the split up of the original party that lots of candidates freely switched from Democrats to Republican parties & vise versa at the drop of a hat.

  • @Zakdayak GOPs were hijacked by zionists neocons [they own the DEMs too] ..look everywere from the finance industry to the militry industrial complx down to the pimping politicians who bows down to Israel..We will not see allies but enemies at the helm... lots of them... and they have the codes to the nukes. These people loves the monopoly... even owning nukes.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more